Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • General Intra Moot Court Competition, 2020 Chanakya National Law University, Patna

    Uploaded by

    Sakshi Priya
    46 views9 pages
    The document outlines a memorandum for a petitioner, Save Blue, which has filed a public interest litigation before the Supreme Court of Sindia challenging a project under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ). It raises four questions for the court's consideration: (1) whether the PIL is maintainable, (2) whether the project will harm the environment and endanger the ecosystem, (3) whether the CRZ violates native tribes' right to livelihood, and (4) whether the CRZ gives excessive discretion to the Union of Sindia contrary to the constitution. The memorandum argues that the PIL is maintainable, the project will damage the environment, the CRZ harms tribes' livelihoods, and the

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    MEMORIAL.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines a memorandum for a petitioner, Save Blue, which has filed a public interest litigation before the Supreme Court of Sindia challenging a project under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ). It raises four questions for the court's consideration: (1) whether the PIL is maintainable, (2) whether the project will harm the environment and endanger the ecosystem, (3) whether the CRZ violates native tribes' right to livelihood, and (4) whether the CRZ gives excessive discretion to the Union of Sindia contrary to the constitution. The memorandum argues that the PIL is maintainable, the project will damage the environment, the CRZ harms tribes' livelihoods, and the

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    46 views9 pages

    General Intra Moot Court Competition, 2020 Chanakya National Law University, Patna

    Uploaded by

    Sakshi Priya
    The document outlines a memorandum for a petitioner, Save Blue, which has filed a public interest litigation before the Supreme Court of Sindia challenging a project under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ). It raises four questions for the court's consideration: (1) whether the PIL is maintainable, (2) whether the project will harm the environment and endanger the ecosystem, (3) whether the CRZ violates native tribes' right to livelihood, and (4) whether the CRZ gives excessive discretion to the Union of Sindia contrary to the constitution. The memorandum argues that the PIL is maintainable, the project will damage the environment, the CRZ harms tribes' livelihoods, and the

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 9

    P-03

    GENERAL INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2020


    CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, PATNA

    ON SUBMISSION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF


    SINDIA

    ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
    WRIT PETITION
    UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SINDIA

    IN THE MATTER OF
    SAVE BLUE………………….…………………………PETITIONER
    V.
    UNION OF INDIA………….…...……....……………..DEFENDANT

    MEMORIAL FOR THE PETITIONER


    I

    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    LIST OF ABBREVIA

    TIONS
    LIST OF AUTHORITIES/ SOURCES

     CONSTITUTION:
     LIST OF ACTS/ STATUTES:
     LIST OF CASES:
     LIST OF BOOKS/BARE ACTS:
     WEBSITES REFERRED:
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

    The laws of Union of Sindia are in pari materia with laws of India.
    The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has the jurisdiction in this matter under Article 32
    of the Constitution of India.
    QUESTIONS PRESENTED

    I. Whether the PIL filed by “Save Blue” seeking interference of Supreme Court is
    maintainable?

    II. Whether the project under CRZ affects the environment endangering ecosystem?

    III. Whether the CRZ is contrary to the native tribal people’s right to livelihood?

    IV. Whether the CRZ giving excessive discretion to the Union of Sindia is ultravires
    of the parent law and the Constitution?
    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

    Whether the PIL filed by “Save Blue” seeking interference of Supreme Court
    is maintainable?

    Yes, the PIL filed by “Save Blue” seeking interference of Supreme Court is maintainable under
    Article 21 and Article 32 of the Indian Constitution.

    Whether the project under CRZ affects the environment endangering


    ecosystem?

    Yes, the project under CRZ affects the environment thus, endangering the ecosystem. It violates
    the regulations under the CRZ-I

    Whether the CRZ is contrary to the native tribal people’s right to livelihood?

    The CRZ is contrary to the native tribal


    Whether the CRZ giving excessive discretion to the Union of Sindia is
    ultravires of the parent law and the Constitution?

    You might also like