Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neocolagenogenesis en La Estetica
Neocolagenogenesis en La Estetica
QUASI-PHYSIOLOGICAL NEO-
COLLAGENOGENESIS
The net amount of procollagen I protein in the dermis of photo-aged
skin, which demonstrated a higher synthesis of procollagen I mRNA, is
much lower. This apparently paradoxical result, which is mainly
connected with the different expression of MMPs, allows some
authors24 the opportunity to write about the potentially different
pathophysiologies of chronological and photo-induced skin ageing 23.
The significant migration and production of new fibroblasts does not
normally take place under quasi-physiological conditions, such as RF,
lasers and chemical substances, as well as topical (TCA) or injectables
(PLLA) procedures. These phenomena can, however, be of significant
importance in moderate to severe tissue damage, for example, in
wound healing or in skin resurfacing procedures, where quick and
strong repair is required. What becomes apparent is the significant
difference between the processes involved in skin rejuvenation and in
wound healing, which are often considered to be very similar. Under
quasi-physiological conditions, the connective tissue remodelling is in
a dynamic balance between the production and destruction of its
matrix components. Each instance of overproduction of collagen or
other ECM components will, in the short-term, initiate the feedback
mechanism, causing the stimulation of their enzymatic degradation
and thus undoing a large part of the stimulatory effect. For example,
the 532 nm KPT and the 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at
intensities of 1.5 J/cm2 can increase the expression of pro-collagens I
and III mRNAs and simultaneously decrease the expression of MMP-1
and MMP-210, consequently suppressing the cleavage of collagen. At
the same time, the ablative application of Er-Yag or CO2 laser could
significantly increase the induction of procollagen I (by up to 7.5
times the original value, 21 days after the procedure) and III mRNAs
and MMP-1 mRNA (by up to 40,000 times, seven days after the
procedure), which also correlates with the dynamical change of MMP-
1 protein levels. Whereas the net amount of procollagen I protein was
also increased, up to six months after CO2 laser treatment, its
increase was much lower than that of procollagen I mRNA, clearly
demonstrating the balancing effect. The qualitative difference
between the dynamic processes in the dermis after the application of
these two treatment modalities may be connected with much
stronger amplitudes of dynamic changes after applying the CO 2 laser.
It has even been assumed that different laser applications can cause
different mechanisms of collagen destruction.
Let us estimate how realistic the changes actually are to the skin’s
appearance through the quasi-physiological remodelling of the
mature collagen network. We will assume the physiological half-life
time of the mature collagen in the dermis to be 15 years. The
increase of the procollagen I protein in the dermis will be taken to be
2.4, as, for example, the maximum value measured after one skin
rejuvenation treatment with photodynamic therapy recorded seven
days after the procedure. Assuming the whole procollagen I protein
will be utilised to replace the mature protein and that the procollagen
upregulation is constant during the whole time after the treatment
(which is surely wrong and will cause us to significantly overestimate
the results), the proportion of the mature collagen network that will
be replaced during the first seven days after the treatment can be
calculated to be approximately 0.15% (the upper limit of the
estimation). Realistically, this value has to be reduced at least twice.
It is absolutely unrealistic that such a modification can significantly
improve the skin appearance and explains why mentioned
procedures need to be repeated to maintain the visible results 23, 29–31.
PHYSIOLOGICAL NEO-COLLAGENOGENESIS VIA
A2A RECEPTORS STIMULATION AND CAV-1
REGULATION
Chronic inflammation and inflammatory cells and cytokine networks
play a pivotal role in one of the leading theories of ageing –
inflammaging. Several cytokines are significantly elevated, including
early proinflammatory factors (tumour necrosis factor-a (TNFa),
interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-6), late proinflammatory factors (e.g., anti-
inflammatory molecules (e.g., IL-10, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and
transforming growth factor b). Also, one of the key facts is the role of
adenosine— a purine nucleoside that is released from a variety of
cells in response to several types of stress32. It has been suggested
that adenosine regulates inflammation via interaction with one or
more of its four known receptors (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3)33. Stimulation
of adenosine A2 and A3 receptors has been shown to alter the
cytokine network by decreasing inflammatory cytokine secretion by
macrophages in vitro34–36. In animal models of acute and chronic
inflammation, non-selective adenosine receptor antagonists reverse
the anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate (MTX), a ‘gold
standard’ of therapy in acute inflammation37–39.
It has been shown by many authors40 that a particular extract of DNA
from the gonadic tissue of wild male sturgeons possesses cell renewal
effects with possible anti-ageing benefits for skin moisture, thickness,
elasticity and a reduction in skin wrinkles. In addition to inhibiting the
early and late inflammatory cytokine cascade, PDRN increased
circulating levels of IL-10 and IL-10 expression in the tissues. Taking
into account all mentioned before and the fact, that the majority of
injectables in aesthetic dermatology should be injected in the
superficial fat pads (sWAT) we propose another model for the possible
interactions (Figure 3) to explain how and why collagen can be
stimulated; moreover, why some methods induce physiological, while
others quasi-physiological or even pathological collagenogenesis.
We want to appeal to all our practitioner colleagues with the following
message: not all of the rejuvenation methods currently offered on the
market have a sufficient evidence base, especially regarding their
safety. This does not mean that they are certainly dangerous, but it
does mean they should be further studied. Again, we urge colleagues
to understand the fact that any self-made changes to the officially
recommended way of administering of the substances (HA, PLA,
CaHa) — for example, mixing with other products or dissolving— is the
responsibility of the doctor, who in this situation, knowingly or
unconsciously, violates the official recommendations and, therefore,
in cases of complications, can find themselves isolated in terms of
legislation and patient safety. And last, but not least, beauty and
youth also have a price, and it is our job to ensure it is not too high.