Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGA Guia 6 PDF
AGA Guia 6 PDF
2003 EDITON
The changes in this addendum are marked by wide vertical lines inserted to the left of modified text or by
overwriting the left border of most tables. The Federal Regulations were changed by 1 amendment that
affected 30 sections of the guide. Nine transactions affected 12 sections of the guide.
Editorial updates include application of the Editorial Guidelines, updating reference titles, adjustments to
page numbering, and adjustment of text on pages. While only significant editorial updates are marked, all
affected pages carry the current addendum footnote. Editorial updates affected 24 sections of the guide
(plus other sections impacted by page adjustments).
The following table shows the affected sections, the pages to be removed, and their replacement pages.
1
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Guide Section Reason For Change Pages to be Removed Replacement Pages
192.913 Amdt. 192-103
192.915 TR04-39
192.917 Amdt. 192-103
192.921 Amdt. 192-103
192.923 Amdt. 192-103
192.925 Amdt. 192-103
192.927 Amdt. 192-103
192.929 Amdt. 192-103
192.931 Amdt. 192-103
192.933 Amdt. 192-103
192.935 Amdt. 192-103
192.937 Amdt. 192-103
192.939 Amdt. 192-103
192.945 Amdt. 192-103
192.947 EU
Appendix B EU, Amdt. 192-103 265/266 and 265/266 and
266(a)/266(b) 266(a)/266(b)
GMA G-191-3 EU PHMSA instructions for PHSMA instructions for
Gas Distribution Annual Gas Distribution Annual
Report 2004 Report 2005
GMA G-191-5 EU PHMSA form (dated PHMSA form (dated
12/03) and instructions 12/05) and instructions
for Transmission and for Transmission and
Gathering Systems Gathering Systems
Annual Report 2004 Annual Report 2005
GMA G-192-1 EU, TR04-13, TR04-30, 315/316 thru 315/316 thru
TR04-39, TR05-04, 326(c)/326(d) 326(c)/326(d)
GMA G-192-1A EU 327/328 and 329/330 327/328 and 329/330
GMA G-192-15 TR05-04 397/398 and 399/400 397/398 and 399/400
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Blank Sheet
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Gas Transmission
and
Distribution Piping
Systems
Author: Secretariat:
Gas Piping Technology Committee (GPTC) Z380 American Gas Association
Accredited by ANSI
PLEASE NOTE
Addenda to this Guide will also be issued in loose-leaf format so that users will be able to keep the
Guide up-to-date by replacing the pages that have been revised with the new pages. It is advisable,
however, that pages which have been revised be retained so that the chronological development of
the Federal Regulations and the Guide is maintained.
CAUTION
As part of subscription service, GPTC (using AGA as Secretariat) will try to keep subscribers
informed on the current Federal Regulations as released by the Department of Transportation (DOT)
This is done by periodically issuing addenda to update both the Federal Regulations and the guide
material. However, the GPTC assumes no responsibility in the event the material that is
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
automatically mailed to subscribers never reaches its destination, or is delivered late. Otherwise, the
subscriber is reminded that the changes to the Regulations can be timely noted on the Federal
Register's web site.
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the American Gas Association.
Participation by state and federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be
interpreted as government or industry endorsement of the guide material in this Guide.
Copyright 2003
THE AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION
400 N. Capitol St., NW
Washington, DC 20001
All Rights Reserved
Printed in U.S.A.
CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE ...........................................................................................................................................xi
HISTORY.............................................................................................................................................xi
SUBPART H -- CUSTOMER METERS, SERVICE REGULATORS, AND SERVICE LINES ....... 125
192.351 Scope ....................................................................................................................... 125
192.353 Customer meters and regulators: Location ............................................................ 125
192.355 Customer meters and regulators: Protection from damage................................... 127
192.357 Customer meters and regulators: Installation......................................................... 129
192.359 Customer meter installations: Operating pressure ................................................. 130
192.361 Service lines: Installation ......................................................................................... 130
192.363 Service lines: Valve requirements........................................................................... 132
192.365 Service lines: Location of valves ............................................................................. 132
192.367 Service lines: General requirements for connections
to main piping ................................................................................................. 133
192.369 Service lines: Connections to cast iron or ductile iron mains................................. 134
192.371 Service lines: Steel ..............................................................................................134(a)
192.373 Service lines: Cast iron and ductile iron..............................................................134(b)
192.375 Service lines: Plastic............................................................................................134(b)
192.377 Service lines: Copper ............................................................................................. 135
192.379 New service lines not in use.................................................................................... 135
192.381 Service lines: Excess flow valve performance standards ...................................... 136
192.383 Excess flow valve customer notification ................................................................. 139
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
of 30 percent or more of SMYS in steel pipelines ......................................... 179
192.557 Uprating: Steel pipelines to a pressure that will produce a hoop stress less
than 30 percent of SMYS: plastic, cast iron, and ductile iron pipelines........ 181
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Guide Material Appendix G-192-1 Summary of references and related sources............. 313
Guide Material Appendix G-192-1A Editions of material specifications, codes and
standards previously incorporated by reference
in the Regulations ....................................................... 327
Guide Material Appendix G-192-2 Specified minimum yield strengths............................. 331
Guide Material Appendix G-192-3 Flexibility factor k and stress
intensification factor i ......................................... 333
Guide Material Appendix G-192-4 Rules for reinforcement of welded branch
connections ........................................................ 337
Guide Material Appendix G-192-5 Pipe end preparation................................................... 347
Guide Material Appendix G-192-6 Substructure damage prevention guidelines for
directional drilling and other trenchless
technologies ....................................................... 353
Guide Material Appendix G-192-7 [Reserved]................................................................... 355
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
INDEX............................................................................................................................................... 429
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
SUBPART B – 192.51
MATERIALS 192.53
192.55 192-3, 192-12, 192-51, 192-68,
192-85
192.57 192-62 (removed and reserved)
192.59 192-19, 192-58
192.61 192-62 (removed and reserved)
192.63 192-3, 192-31, 192-31A, 192-61,
192-61A, 192-62, 192-68, 192-76
192.65 192-12, 192-17, 192-68
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
SUBPART E – 192.221
WELDING OF STEEL [192.223] 192-52 (removed)
IN PIPELINES 192.225 192-18, 192-22, 192-37, 192-52,
192-94, 192-103
192.227 192-18, 192-18A, 192-22, 192-37,
192-43, 192-52, 192-75, 192-78,
192-94, 192-103
192.229 192-18, 192-18A, 192-37, 192-78,
192-85, 192-94, 192-103
192.231
192.233
192.235
[192.237] 192-37, 192-52 (removed)
[192.239] 192-37, 192-52 (removed)
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
192.241 192-18, 192-18A, 192-37, 192-78,
192-85, 192-94, 192-103
192.243 192-27, 192-50, 192-78
192.245 192-27, 192-46
SUBPART F – 192.271
JOINING OF 192.273
MATERIALS OTHER 192.275 192-62
THAN BY WELDING 192.277 192-62
192.279 192-62, 192-68
192.281 192-34, 192-58, 192-61, 192-68,
192-78
192.283 07/01/80 192-34 + Ext., 192-34A, 192-34B,
192-68, 192-78, 192-85, 192-94
192-103
192.285 07/01/80 192-34 + Ext., 192-34A, 192-34B
192-93, 192-94
192.287 07/01/80 192-34 + Ext., 192-94
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
SUBPART K - 192.551
UPRATING 192.553 192-78, 192-93
192.555
192.557 192-37, 192-62, 192-85
SUBPART L - 192.601
OPERATIONS 192.603 192-27A Ext., 192-66, 192-71,
192-75
192.605 192-27A Ext., 192-59, 192-71,
192-71A, 192-93
192.607 192-5, 192-78 (removed and
reserved)
192.609
192.611 192-5, 192-53, 192-63, 192-78,
192-94
192.612 01/06/92 192-67, 192-85, 192-98
192.613
192.614 04/01/83 192-40, 192-57, 192-73, 192-78,
192-82, 192-84 + DFR Removal
192.615 192-24, 192-71
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
192.616 02/11/95 192-71, 192-99, 192-103
192.617
192.619 192-3, 192-27, 192-27A, 192-30,
192-78, 192-85, 192-102, 192-103
192.621 192-85
192.623 192-75
192.625 192-2, 192-6, 192-7, 192-14,
192-15, 192-16, 192-21, 192-58
192-76, 192-78, 192-93
192.627
192.629
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
SUBPART M - 192.701
MAINTENANCE 192.703
102.705 192-21, 192-43, 192-78
192.706 06/04/75 192-21, 192-43, 192-71
192.707 192-20, 192-20A, 192-27, 192-40,
192-44, 192-73, 192-85
192.709 192-78
192.711 192-27B, 192-88
192.713 192-27, 192-88
192.715 192-85
192.717 192-11, 192-27, 192-85, 192-88
192.719 192-54
192.721 192-43, 192-78
192.723 192-43, 192-70, 192-71, 192-94
192.725
192.727 192-8, 192-27, 192-71, 192-89,
RIN 2137-AD77
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
Effective
Date of
Part 192 Part 192 Original Amendments (if any)
Subpart Section Version if
other than
11/12/70
102 Gas Gathering Line 71 FR 13289 03/15/06 RIN 2137- 04/14/06 1, 7, 8, 9, 13, 452,
Definition AB15 619
103 Update of Regulatory 71 FR 33402 06/09/06 RIN 2138- 07/10/06 7, 121, 123, 145,
References to AD68 225, 227, 229, 241,
Technical Standards 283, 616, 619,
Header before 761,
Subpart O Header,
903, 907, 911, 913,
917, 921, 923, 925,
927, 929, 931, 933,
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
App. B
* Issued as a Direct Final Rule (DFR).
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Abraham, Richard A. X X X X
New England Gas Co., Providence, RI
Affonso, Joaquin J. X X X X
Consumers Energy Co., Jackson, MI
Alexander, Thomas D. X X X
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Abbreviations:
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Blaney, Steven D. X X X X X
NY State Dept. of Public Service, Albany, NY
Blanton, Glynn X X X
TN Regulatory Authority, Nashville, TN
Booth, Lloyd E. X X X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
Provided by IHS under license with AGA
Copyright American Gas Association
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Hotinger, James M. X X X
VA State Corp. Comm., Richmond, VA
Humes, Dennis W. X X X
Mueller Co.- Gas Products Div., Decatur, IL
Hurbanek, Stephen F. X X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Lively, Karen S. X X X
Performance Pipe, Plano, TX
Loker, Jon O. X X Chair X
Pipeline Safety Consultant, Saint Albans, WV
Lomax, George S. X X X X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Naper, Robert C. X X
KeySpan Corp., Waltham, MA
Oleksa, Paul E. X X X X X
Oleksa & Assoc., Akron, OH
Palermo, Eugene F. X X X X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Scott, Edward W. X X X
AmerenIP, Pawnee, IL
Seamands, Patrick A. X X X X
Laclede Gas Co., Saint Louis, MO
Sher, Philip 2nd V X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
(Continued)
Manufacturers
IMP/Corrosion
Transmission
Chairperson: Chair
Regulations
Distribution
Plastic Pipe
Main Body
Executive
st
O&M/OQ
First Vice Chairperson: 1 V Chair
Editorial
Liaison
Design
DP/ER
nd
Second Vice Chairperson: 2 V Chair
Secretary: Sec
Damage Prevention - Emergency Response: DP/ER
Operation and Maintenance: O&M
Troch, Steven J. X X
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., Baltimore, MD
Ulanday, Alfredo S. X X X
Peoples Energy Corp., Chicago, IL
Veerapaneni, Ram X X X X
Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
Licensee=BP International/5928366101
Reserved
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Tensile strength is the highest unit tensile stress (referred to the original cross section) that a material can
sustain before failure (psi)
Thermoplastic is a plastic, which is capable of being repeatedly softened by increase of temperature, and
hardened by decreases of temperature.
Thermosetting plastic is a plastic that is capable of being changed into a substantially infusible or insoluble
product when cured under the application of heat or by chemical means.
Thickness. See Nominal wall thickness.
Valve. See Curb valve and Service line valve.
Vault is an underground structure which may be entered, and which is designed to contain piping and piping
components (such as valves or pressure regulators).
Yield strength is the strength at which a material exhibits a specified limiting permanent set, or produces a
specified total elongation under load. The specified limiting set or elongation is usually expressed as a
percentage of gage length, and its values are specified in the various material specifications acceptable
under this Guide.
Abbreviation Meaning
ABS acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene
ASV automatic shut-off valve
BAP baseline assessment plan
CAB cellulose acetate butyrate
CDA confirmatory direct assessment
CGI combustible gas indicator
DA direct assessment
ECDA external corrosion direct assessment
EFV excess flow valve
EFVB excess flow valve – bypass (automatic reset)
EFVNB excess flow valve – non-bypass (manual reset)
ERW electric resistance welded
ESD emergency shutdown
FAQ frequently asked question
HCA high consequence area
HDB hydrostatic design basis
HFI hydrogen flame ionization
IC internal corrosion
ICDA internal corrosion direct assessment
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Abbreviation Meaning
PA Polyamide
P&M measures preventive and mitigative measures
PDB pressure design basis
PE polyethylene
PVC poly (vinyl chloride), also written as polyvinyl chloride
RCV remote control valve
SCADA supervisory control and data acquisition
SCC stress corrosion cracking
SCCDA stress corrosion cracking direct assessment
SDB strength design basis
SDR standard dimension ratio
SMYS specified minimum yield strength
§192.5
Class locations.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
(a) This section classifies pipeline locations for purposes of this part. The following criteria
apply to classifications under this section.
(1) A "class location unit" is an onshore area that extends 220 yards (200 meters) on either
side of the centerline of any continuous 1- mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline.
(2) Each separate dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling unit building is counted as a separate
building intended for human occupancy.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, pipeline locations are classified as
follows:
(1) A Class 1 location is:
(i) An offshore area; or
(ii) Any class location unit that has 10 or fewer buildings intended for human
occupancy.
(2) A Class 2 location is any class location unit that has more than 10 but fewer than 46
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
buildings intended for human occupancy.
(3) A Class 3 location is:
(i) Any class location unit that has 46 or more buildings intended for human
occupancy; or
(ii) An area where the pipeline lies within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or
a small, well-defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other
place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10
weeks in any 12-month period. (The days and weeks need not be consecutive.)
(4) A Class 4 location is any class location unit where buildings with four or more stories
above ground are prevalent.
(c) The length of Class locations 2, 3, and 4 may be adjusted as follows:
(1) A Class 4 location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building with four or
more stories above ground.
(2) When a cluster of buildings intended for human occupancy requires a Class 2 or 3
location, the class location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building in the cluster.
[Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-56, 52 FR 32924, Sept. 1, 1987; Amdt. 192-78,
61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996 and Amdt. 192-
78 Correction, 61 FR 35139, July 5, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.7
What documents are incorporated by reference partly or wholly in this part?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Any documents or portions thereof incorporated by reference in this part are included in
this part as though set out in full. When only a portion of a document is referenced, the remainder is
not incorporated in this part.
(b) All incorporated materials are available for inspection in the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202–741–6030 or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. These
materials have been approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. In addition, the incorporated materials are
available from the respective organizations listed in paragraph (c) (1) of this section.
(c) The full titles of documents incorporated by reference, in whole or in part, are provided
herein. The numbers in parentheses indicate applicable editions. For each incorporated document,
citations of all affected sections are provided. Earlier editions of currently listed documents or
editions of documents listed in previous editions of 49 CFR part 192 may be used for materials and
components designed, manufactured, or installed in accordance with these earlier documents at the
time they were listed. The user must refer to the appropriate previous edition of 49 CFR part 192 for
a listing of the earlier listed editions or documents.
(1) Incorporated by reference (IBR). List of Organizations and Addresses:
A. Pipeline Research Council International, Inc. (PRCI), c/o Technical Toolboxes, 3801
Kirby Drive, Suite 520, Houston, TX 77098.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Source and name of referenced material 49 CFR (Continued) 49 CFR reference (Continued)
(8) ASTM A691-98 (Reapproved 2002) ‘‘Standard §§192.113; Item I, Appendix B.
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-
Welded for High-Pressure Service at High Temperatures.’’
(9) ASTM D638-03 ‘‘Standard Test Method for Tensile §§192.283(a)(3); 192.283(b)(1).
Properties of Plastics.’’
(10) ASTM D2513-87 ‘‘Standard Specification for §192.63(a)(1).
Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.”
(11) ASTM D2513-99 ‘‘Standard Specification for §§192.191(b); 192.281(b)(2);
Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.” 192.283(a)(1)(i); Item I, Appendix
B.
(12) ASTM D2517-00 ‘‘Standard Specification for Reinforced §§192.191(a); 192.281(d)(1);
Epoxy Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings.’’ 192.283(a)(1)(ii); Item I, Appendix
B.
(13) ASTM F1055-1998 ‘‘Standard Specification for §192.283(a)(1)(iii).
Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter
Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing.’’
D. ASME International (ASME):
(1) ASME B16.1-1998 ‘‘Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged §192.147(c).
Fittings.’’
(2) ASME B16.5-2003 (October 2004) ‘‘Pipe Flanges and §§192.147(a); 192.279.
Flanged Fittings.’’
(3) ASME B31G-1991 (Reaffirmed; 2004) ‘‘Manual for §§192.485(c); 192.933(a).
Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines.’’
(4) ASME B31.8-2003 (February 2004) ‘‘Gas Transmission and §192.619(a)(1)(i).
Distribution Piping Systems.’’
(5) ASME B31.8S-2004 ‘‘Supplement to B31.8 on Managing §§192.903(c); 192.907(b); 192.911,
System Integrity of Gas Pipelines.’’ Introductory text; 192.911(i);
192.911(k); 192.911(l); 192.911(m);
192.913(a) Introductory text;
192.913(b)(1); 192.917(a)
Introductory text; 192.917(b);
192.917(c); 192.917(e)(1);
192.917(e)(4); 192.921(a)(1);
192.923(b)(2); 192.923(b)(3);
192.925(b) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(1); 192.925(b)(2);
192.925(b)(3); 192.925(b)(4);
192.927(b); 192.927(c)(1)(i);
192.929(b)(1); 192.929(b)(2);
192.933(a); 192.933(d)(1);
192.933(d)(1)(i); 192.935(a);
192.935(b)(1)(iv); 192.937(c)(1);
192.939(a)(1)(i); 192.939(a)(1)(ii);
192.939(a)(3); 192.945(a).
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, 1986; Amdt. 192-68, 58
FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61
FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004 with Amdt. 192-94 Correction, 69
FR 54591, Sept. 9, 2004; RIN 2137-AD77, 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005; Amdt. 192-99, 70 FR 28833, May
19, 2005 with Amdt. 192-99 Correction, 70 FR 35041, June 16, 2005; Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar.
15, 2006; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
Additional standards and specifications recommended for use under this Guide, and the names and
addresses of the sponsoring organizations, are shown in Guide Material Appendix G-192-1. See Guide
Material Appendix G-192-1A for documents previously incorporated by reference in the Regulations.
§192.8
How are onshore gathering lines and regulated onshore gathering
lines determined?
[Effective Date: 4-14-06]
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(a) An operator must use API RP 80 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), to determine if
an onshore pipeline (or part of a connected series of pipelines) is an onshore gathering line. The
determination is subject to the limitations listed below. After making this determination, an
operator must determine if the onshore gathering line is a regulated onshore gathering line under
paragraph (b) of this section.
(1) The beginning of gathering, under section 2.2(a)(1) of API RP 80, may not extend
beyond the furthermost downstream point in a production operation as defined in section 2.3 of
API RP 80. This furthermost downstream point does not include equipment that can be used in
either production or transportation, such as separators or dehydrators, unless that equipment is
involved in the processes of ‘‘production and preparation for transportation or delivery of
hydrocarbon gas’’ within the meaning of ‘‘production operation.’’
(2) The endpoint of gathering, under section 2.2(a)(1)(A) of API RP 80, may not extend
beyond the first downstream natural gas processing plant, unless the operator can demonstrate,
using sound engineering principles, that gathering extends to a further downstream plant.
(3) If the endpoint of gathering, under section 2.2(a)(1)(C) of API RP 80, is determined by
the commingling of gas from separate production fields, the fields may not be more than 50 miles
from each other, unless the Administrator finds a longer separation distance is justified in a
particular case (see 49 CFR §190.9).
(4) The endpoint of gathering, under section 2.2(a)(1)(D) of API RP 80, may not extend
beyond the furthermost downstream compressor used to increase gathering line pressure for
delivery to another pipeline.
(b) For purposes of §192.9, ‘‘regulated onshore gathering line’’ means:
(1) Each onshore gathering line (or segment of onshore gathering line) with a feature
described in the second column that lies in an area described in the third column; and
(2) As applicable, additional lengths of line described in the fourth column to provide a
safety buffer:
GUIDE MATERIAL
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 USE OF DESIGN FACTOR (F) FOR STEEL PIPE IN §§192.111(b), (c), and (d)
1 2 3 4
The rights-of-way of hard surfaced roads, highways, public streets, .60 .50 .50 .40
railroads
The rights-of-way of hard surfaced roads, highways, public streets, .72 .60 .50 .40
railroads
The rights-of-way of hard surfaced roads, highways, public streets, .60 .60 .50 .40
railroads
1 2 3 4
Pipe, including pipe risers, on platforms located offshore .50 N/A N/A N/A
Pipe, including risers, on platforms located in inland navigable waters .50 .50 .50 .40
Notes:
1. "Private roads" are roads that are not intended for use by the general public and over which travel
and transportation are restricted.
2. Section 192.165(b)(3) requires that liquid separators located in compressor stations and
constructed of pipe and fittings without internal welding must be fabricated with a design factor (F)
of 0.40, or less.
TABLE 192.111i
§192.113
Longitudinal joint factor (E) for steel pipe.
[Effective Date: 7-14-04]
The longitudinal joint factor to be used in the design formula in §192.105 is determined in
accordance with the following table:
Longitudinal
Specification Pipe Class Joint Factor
(E)
ASTM A 53/A53M Seamless 1.00
Electric resistance welded 1.00
Furnace butt welded 0.60
ASTM A 106 Seamless 1.00
ASTM A 333/A 333M Seamless 1.00
Electric resistance welded 1.00
ASTM A 381 Double submerged arc welded 1.00
ASTM A 671 Electric-fusion-welded 1.00
Longitudinal
Specification (Continued) Pipe Class Joint Factor
(E)
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
If the type of longitudinal joint cannot be determined, the joint factor to be used must not exceed
that designated for "Other".
[Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, 1986; Amdt. 192-62, 54
FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
Manufacture of furnace lap-welded pipe was discontinued and process deleted from API Spec 5L in 1962.
§192.115
Temperature derating factor (T) for steel pipe.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
The temperature derating factor to be used in the design formula in §192.105 is determined as
follows:
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.117
(Removed and reserved.)
[Effective Date: 3-8-89]
§192.119
(Removed and reserved.)
[Effective Date: 3-8-89]
§192.121
Design of plastic pipe.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
Subject to the limitations of §192.123, the design pressure for plastic pipe is determined in
accordance with either of the following formulas:
P = 2S t 0.32
(D-t)
P = 2S 0.32
(SDR-1)
Where:
P = Design pressure, gauge, kPa (psig).
S = For thermoplastic pipe, the HDB is determined in accordance with the listed
specification at a temperature equal to 73 oF (23 oC), 100 oF (38 oC), 120 oF (49 oC), or 140
o
F (60 oC). In the absence an HDB established at the specified temperature, the HDB of a
higher temperature may be used in determining a design pressure rating at the specified
temperature by arithmetic interpolation using the procedure in Part D.2. of PPI TR–
3/2004, HDB/PDB/SDB/MRS Policies (incorporated by reference, see §192.7). For
reinforced thermosetting plastic pipe, 11,000 psig (75,842 kPa).
t = Specified wall thickness, mm (in.).
D = Specified outside diameter, mm (in.).
SDR = Standard dimension ratio, the ratio of the average specified outside diameter to the
minimum specified wall thickness, corresponding to a value from a common numbering
system that was derived from the American National Standards Institute preferred
number series 10.
[Amdt. 192-31, 43 FR 13880, Apr. 3, 1978 with Amdt. 192-31 Correction, 43 FR 43308, Sept. 25, 1978;
Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996;
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004; Amdt. 192-
103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 NATURAL GAS
(a) Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB) values are awarded by the Hydrostatic Stress Board (HSB) of the
Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI) and are listed in PPI TR-4, which can be accessed at
www.plasticpipe.org.
(b) ASTM D 2513 requires elevated temperature HDB listings for plastic piping materials used at
temperatures above 73 °F. PPI publishes elevated temperature HDB values for PE and PA
materials in TR-4.
(c) Magnetically-filled PE (reference ASTM D 2513, Annex A.6) is considered as either PE 2406 or PE
3408 material.
(d) Long-term hydrostatic strength (LTHS) for reinforced thermosetting plastic covered by ASTM D
2517 is 11,000 psi.
(e) HDB values apply only to materials meeting all the requirements of ASTM D 2513 and are based
on engineering test data analyzed in accordance with ASTM D 2837, "Standard Test Method for
Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials or Pressure Design Basis for
Thermoplastic Pipe Products."
(f) HDB values at 73 °F for thermoplastic materials covered by ASTM D 2513 are listed in Table
192.121i. The values used in the design formula for thermoplastic materials are actually HDB
values that are a categorized value of the long-term hydrostatic strength.
PE 2406 1250
PE 3408 1600
TABLE 192.121i
2 PETROLEUM GASES
PE and PA materials listed in ASTM D 2513 may be used for liquid petroleum gas (LPG) piping
applications. NFPA 58 (referenced by §192.7) prescribes the following:
(a) PA may be used in liquid or vapor LPG systems up to the design pressure of the piping material.
PPI recommends a chemical derating factor of 1.0 (no derating) for PA 11 piping.
(b) PE, when recommended by the manufacturer, may be used in vapor-only LPG systems up to 30
psig pressure. PPI recommends a 0.5 chemical derating factor for the use of PE piping.
(c) PVC is not permitted.
Some information on the strengths of polyethylenes with propane is given in PPI TR-22, “Polyethylene
Piping Distribution Systems for Components of Liquid Petroleum Gases.” See guide material under
§192.123.
The minimum wall thickness (tm) for a given design pressure is determined from the formula below.
Also, see §§192.123 (c) and (d) plus 3 of the guide material under §192.123.
tm = PD
(P + 0.64 S)
Where:
P = Design pressure, gauge, kPa (psi)
D = Specified outside diameter, mm (in.)
S = The long-term hydrostatic strength, for thermoplastic pipe, kPa (psi) determined at 23 oC
(73 oF), 38 oC (100 oF), 49 oC (120 oF), or 60 oC (140 oF); for reinforced thermosetting
pipe, 75,800 kPa (11,000 psi)
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(a) For thermoplastic pipe that is to be installed at a service temperature greater than 73 ºF and less
than that at which the next HDB has been established, the HDB at the anticipated service
temperature can be determined by interpolation. The pipe manufacturer should be consulted for
assistance in determining an interpolated HDB.
(b) The interpolation formula as prescribed in §192.121 is published in PPI TR-3 as follows.
1 1
( SL − SH )( − )
S T = SL − TL TT
1 1
( − )
TL TH
Where:
ST = Interpolated LTHS for the anticipated service temperature (psi)
SL = LTHS established at a temperature below the anticipated service temperature (psi)
SH = LTHS established at a temperature above the anticipated service temperature (psi)
TL = Temperature at which the lower LTHS (SL) was established (K)
TT = Anticipated service temperature (K)
TH = Temperature at which the higher LTHS (SH) was established (K)
(c) Section 192.121 requires that the interpolation be made between the LTHS values at the lower and
higher temperatures. The resulting interpolated LTHS is categorized into an HDB. This interpolated
HDB is then used to determine the design pressure under §192.121.
(d) Example:
An operator is installing SDR 11 PE pipe where the anticipated service temperature is 78 ºF. HDB
values are established and published in PPI TR-4 at 73 ºF (296 K) and 140 ºF (333 K). Thus, the
operator has the option of establishing an interpolated HDB at the anticipated service temperature,
78 °F (299 K), or using the 140 °F HDB of 800 psi.
(1) In order to calculate the HDB for the anticipated service temperature, the operator must obtain
the actual LTHS values established for the material at the nearest temperature above and
below the temperature for which the interpolated value is to be determined. These values are
typically available from the pipe supplier. If these LTHS values are not available, the lowest
LTHS for the HDB category in Table 192.121ii may be used as a conservative estimate.
(2) Once the LTHS values are obtained, the interpolation calculation input is as follows.
SL(73 °F) = 1567 psi
SH(140 °F) = 845 psi
TL = 73 ºF (295.93 K)
TT = 78 ºF (298.71 K)
TH = 140 ºF (333.15 K)
Hence, the interpolation calculation determines that ST = 1506.86 psi or 1507 psi.
(3) To determine the HDB at 78 ºF, the interpolated LTHS value is categorized using Table 1 from
ASTM Standard D 2837-04, a selection of which is shown in Table 192.121ii.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Psi (MPa) psi (MPa)
600 to <760 (4.14 to <5.24) 630 (4.34)
760 to <960 (5.24 to <6.62) 800 (5.52)
960 to <1200 (6.62 to <8.27) 1000 (6.89)
1200 to <1530 (8.27 to <10.55) 1250 (8.62)
1530 to <1920 (10.55 to <13.24) 1600 (11.03)
TABLE 192.121ii
(4) Based upon an interpolated LTHS value of 1510 psi, the HDB to be used in the design formula
for this example is 1250 psi.
For this SDR 11 PE pipe with an anticipated service temperature of 78 °F, the design pressure
is calculated in accordance with §192.121 using the interpolated HDB of 1250 psi as follows.
2S 2(1250 psi)
P= (.32) = (.32) = 80 psig
(SDR − 1) (11 − 1)
5 REFERENCES
(a) PPI TR-4, "PPI Listing of Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB), Pressure
Design Basis (PDB) and Minimum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping
Materials or Pipe."
(b) PPI TR-22, "Polyethylene Piping Distribution Systems for Components of Liquid Petroleum Gases."
§192.123
Design limitations for plastic pipe.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the design pressure may not exceed a
gauge pressure of 100 psig (689 kPa) for plastic pipe used in:
(1) Distribution systems; or
(2) Classes 3 and 4 locations.
(b) Plastic pipe may not be used where operating temperatures of the pipe will be:
(1) Below –20 oF (–29 oC), or –40 oF (–40 oC) if all pipe and pipeline components whose
operating temperature will be below –20 oF (–29 oC) have a temperature rating by the manufacturer
consistent with that operating temperature; or
(2) Above the following applicable temperatures:
(i) For thermoplastic pipe, the temperature at which the HDB used in the design
formula under §192.121 is determined.
(ii) For reinforced thermosetting plastic pipe, 150 oF (66 oC).
(c) The wall thickness for thermoplastic pipe may not be less than 0.062 inches (1.57
millimeters).
(d) The wall thickness for reinforced thermosetting plastic pipe may not be less than that listed
in the following table:
(e) The design pressure for thermoplastic pipe produced after July 14, 2004 may exceed a
gauge pressure of 100 psig (689 kPa) provided that:
(1) The design pressure does not exceed 125 psig (862 kPa);
(2) The material is a PE2406 or a PE3408 as specified within ASTM D2513 (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7);
(3) The pipe size is nominal pipe size (IPS) 12 or less; and
(4) The design pressure is determined in accordance with the design equation defined in
§192.121.
[Amdt. 192-31, 43 FR 13880, Apr. 3, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78
Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68
FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004 with Amdt. 192-94 Correction,
69 FR 54591, Sept. 9, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
The impact and ductility properties of plastics should be evaluated when the material is intended for use
in facilities subjected to low temperatures.
2 PETROLEUM GASES
The pressure-temperature relationship with petroleum gases should be such that condensation will not
occur when using PE piping.
3 HOT TAPS
(a) To minimize the probability of a blowout when making a hot-plate saddle fusion on polyethylene
(PE) pipe with a wall thickness of 0.216 inches or less, operating at pressures up to and including
100 psig, it may be necessary to require heavier wall thickness than determined by the pressure
design formula. The manufacturer of the PE pipe should be contacted for recommendations.
(b) For those PE pipelines operated at pressures greater than 100 psig, the probability of blowouts
when making hot-plate saddle fusions increases due to the increased pressure. The pipeline
pressure may need to be reduced during such fusions.
(c) Electrofusion tapping tees may be used as an alternate to hot-plate fusion tapping tees to reduce
the probability of blowouts when hot tapping PE pipes. The manufacturer of the electrofusion fitting
should be contacted for recommendations.
(d) Mechanical tapping tees may be used as an alternative to heat-fusion tapping tees to avoid the
possibility of blowouts when tapping PE pipes.
Amendment No. 6, September 2006 46
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND 192.123
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition SUBPART C
4.1 General.
Liquid hydrocarbons such as gasoline, diesel fuel, and condensates, either inside the pipe or in the
surrounding soil, are known to have a detrimental effect on PE and PVC plastic piping materials. PA 11
piping is not affected by liquid hydrocarbons. Contact the piping manufacturer for specific
recommendations.
Where:
Pde-rated = De-rated design pressure, gauge, psig (kPa).
P§192.121 = Design pressure, gauge, psig (kPa) determined under §192.121.
DFC = Chemical Design Factor determined in accordance with Table 192.123i.
TABLE 192.123i
(b) If PE or PVC pipe is to be exposed intermittently to liquid hydrocarbons, the pipe manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the appropriate DFC.
4.3 References.
(a) PA pipe.
(1) “An Evaluation of Polyamide 11 for Use in High Pressure/High Temperature Gas Piping
Systems,” T.J. Pitzi et al., 15th Plastic Fuel Gas Pipe Symposium Proceedings - 1997, p. 107.
(2) “Polyamide 11 Liners Withstand Hydrocarbons, High Temperature,” A. Berry, Pipeline & Gas
Journal, December 1998, p. 81.
(b) PE pipe.
(1) PPI TR-9, “Recommended Design Factors and Design Coefficients for Thermoplastic Pressure
Pipe.”
(2) PPI TR-22, “Polyethylene Piping Distribution Systems for Components of Liquid Petroleum
Gases.”
(3) “Mechanical Integrity of Fusion Joints Made from Polyethylene Pipe Exposed to Heavy
Hydrocarbons,” S.M. Pimputkar, 14th Plastic Fuel Gas Pipe Symposium Proceedings - 1995, p.
141.
(4) “Strength of Fusion Joints Made from Polyethylene Pipe Exposed to Heavy Hydrocarbons,”
S.M. Pimputkar, 15th Plastic Fuel Gas Pipe Symposium Proceedings - 1997, p. 309.
(5) GRI 96/0194, “Service Effects of Hydrocarbons on Fusion and Mechanical Performance of
Polyethylene Gas Distribution Piping.”
(c) PVC pipe.
“Prediction of Organic Chemical Permeation through PVC Pipe,” A.R. Berens, Research
Technology, November 1985, p. 57.
§192.125
Design of copper pipe.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
(a) Copper pipe used in mains must have a minimum wall thickness of 0.065 inches (1.65
millimeters) and must be hard drawn.
(b) Copper pipe used in service lines must have wall thickness not less than that indicated in
the following table:
(c) Copper pipe used in mains and service lines may not be used at pressures in excess of 100
p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage.
(d) Copper pipe that does not have an internal corrosion resistant lining may not be used to
carry gas that has an average hydrogen sulfide content of more than 0.3 grains/100 ft3 (6.9/m3) under
standard conditions. Standard conditions refers to 60 oF and 14.7 psia (15.6 oC and one atmosphere)
of gas.
[Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
GUIDE MATERIAL
SUBPART D
DESIGN OF PIPELINE COMPONENTS
§192.141
Scope.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for the design and installation of pipeline
components and facilities. In addition, it prescribes requirements relating to protection against
accidental overpressuring.
GUIDE MATERIAL
Useful industry references for design and construction of auxiliary piping for compressor stations or other
similar installations (other than gas piping) are listed in Table 192.141i. Federal, state and local requirements
may also apply.
TABLE 192.141i
§192.143
General requirements.
[Effective Date: 6-11-84]
Each component of a pipeline must be able to withstand operating pressures and other
anticipated loadings without impairment of its serviceability with unit stresses equivalent to those
allowed for comparable material in pipe in the same location and kind of service. However, if design
based upon unit stresses is impractical for a particular component, design may be based upon a
pressure rating established by the manufacturer by pressure testing that component or a prototype
of the component.
GUIDE MATERIAL
The designer should select components that will withstand the field test pressure to which they will be
subjected without failure or leakage and without impairment to their serviceability. Consideration should also
be given to pulsation-induced vibrations that could produce excessive cyclic stresses.
See Guide Material Appendix G-192-9 and Guide Material Appendix G-192-10.
§192.144
Qualifying Metallic Components.
[Effective Date: 7-14-04]
[Issued by Amdt. 192-45, 48 FR 30637, July 5, 1983; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
See Guide Material Appendix G-192-1A for documents previously incorporated by reference in the
Regulations. Current documents incorporated by reference that were listed in Appendix A prior to
Amendment 192-94, published June 14, 2004, are now found in §192.7.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
If the edition of the document under which the component was manufactured was neither previously listed
nor currently listed in §192.7, and was not previously listed in Appendix A, then requirements under
§192.144(b) should be reviewed to determine if the metallic component is qualified for use under Part 192.
§192.145
Valves.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Except for cast iron and plastic valves, each valve must meet the minimum requirements of
API 6D (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), or to a national or international standard that
provides an equivalent
performance level. A valve may not be used under operating conditions that exceed the applicable
pressure-temperature ratings contained in those requirements.
(b) Each cast iron and plastic valve must comply with the following:
(1) The valve must have a maximum service pressure rating for temperatures that equal or
exceed the maximum service temperature.
(2) The valve must be tested as part of the manufacturing, as follows:
(i) With the valve in the fully open position, the shell must be tested with no leakage
to a pressure at least 1.5 times the maximum service rating.
(ii) After the shell test, the seat must be tested to a pressure not less than 1.5 times
the maximum service pressure rating. Except for swing check valves, test pressure during the seat
test must be applied successively on each side of the closed valve with the opposite side open. No
visible leakage is permitted.
(iii) After the last pressure test is completed, the valve must be operated through its
full travel to demonstrate freedom from interference.
(c) Each valve must be able to meet the anticipated operating conditions.
(d) No valve having shell components made of ductile iron may be used at pressures exceeding
80 percent of the pressure ratings for comparable steel valves at their listed temperature. However, a
valve having shell components made of ductile iron may be used at pressures up to 80 percent of
the pressure ratings for comparable steel valves at their listed temperature, if --
(1) The temperature-adjusted service pressure does not exceed 1,000 p.s.i (7MPa) gage;
and
(2) Welding is not used on any ductile iron component in the fabrication of the valve shells
or their assembly.
(e) No valve having pressure-containing parts made of ductile iron may be used in the gas pipe
components of compressor stations.
[Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17659, Nov. 17, 1970; Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31, 1976; Amdt. 192-37, 46
FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
Consideration should be given to the effect of secondary stresses (e.g., resulting from earth movement,
expansion and contraction or other external forces) which could affect the structural integrity of flanged
cast iron valves in steel pipelines. Adequate support, compression couplings, or other means may be
used.
2 EQUIVALENCY
3 PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE RATING
Any valve which cannot comply to the API Spec 6D standard pressure-temperature rating because of
material(s) which require a reduced maximum temperature limit should be provided with markings on
the nameplate showing the maximum pressure rating at that temperature and with the pressure rating
at 100 oF.
§192.147
Flanges and flange accessories.
[Effective Date: 4-19-93]
(a) Each flange or flange accessory (other than cast iron) must meet the minimum re-
quirements of ASME/ANSI B16.5, MSS SP-44, or the equivalent.
(b) Each flange assembly must be able to withstand the maximum pressure at which the
pipeline is to be operated and to maintain its physical and chemical properties at any temperature to
which it is anticipated that it might be subjected in service.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(c) Each flange on a flanged joint in cast iron pipe must conform in dimensions, drilling, face
and gasket design to ASME/ANSI B16.1 and be cast integrally with the pipe, valve, or fitting.
[Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 FLANGES
SUBPART E
WELDING OF STEEL IN PIPELINES
§192.221
Scope.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
(a) This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for welding steel materials in pipelines.
(b) This subpart does not apply to welding that occurs during the manufacture of steel pipe or
steel pipeline components.
GUIDE MATERIAL
Welding terms used in this Guide generally conform to the standard definitions established by the American
Welding Society and contained in AWS Publication A3.0 "Standard Welding Terms and Definitions." See
definition of "Pipe Manufacturing Processes" in the guide material under §192.3 for exceptions.
§192.223
(Removed.)
[Effective Date: 7-7-86]
§192.225
Welding procedures.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Welding must be performed by a qualified welder in accordance with welding procedures
qualified under section 5 of API 1104 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7) or section IX of the
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code ‘‘Welding and Brazing Qualifications’’ (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7) to produce welds meeting the requirements of this subpart. The quality of the
test welds used to qualify welding procedures shall be determined by destructive testing in
accordance with the applicable welding standard(s).
(b) Each welding procedure must be recorded in detail, including the results of the qualifying
tests. This record must be retained and followed whenever the procedure is used.
[Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975; Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31, 1976; Amdt. 192-37, 46
FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20294, June 4, 1986; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June
14, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
(b) API Std 1104, "Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities," Appendix B, "In-Service Welding.”
Information on preheating and stress relieving of welded connections can be found in the above references.
Preheating and stress relieving should be performed in accordance with the qualified welding procedure
being used.
§192.227
Qualification of welders.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each welder must be qualified in
accordance with section 6 of API 1104 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7) or section IX of the
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (incorporated by reference, see §192.7). However, a welder
qualified under an earlier edition than listed in appendix A of this part may weld but may not
requalify under that earlier edition.
(b) A welder may qualify to perform welding on pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces
a hoop stress of less than 20 percent of SMYS by performing an acceptable test weld, for the
process to be used, under the test set forth in section I of Appendix C of this part. Each welder who
is to make a welded service line connection to a main must first perform an acceptable test weld
under section II of Appendix C of this part as a requirement of the qualifying test.
[Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975 with Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975; Amdt. 192-
22, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31, 1976; Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850,
Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20294, June 4, 1986; Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996
with Amdt. 192-75 Correction, 61 FR 38403, July 24, 1996; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996
with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
It is the operator's responsibility to ensure that all welding is performed by qualified welders. The ability of
welders to make sound welds should be determined by test welds using previously qualified welding
procedures. The evaluation of test welds may be conducted by qualified operator personnel or testing
laboratories.
§192.229
Limitations on welders.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) No welder whose qualification is based on nondestructive testing may weld compressor
station pipe and components.
(b) No welder may weld with a particular welding process unless, within the preceding 6
calendar months, he has engaged in welding with that process.
(c) A welder qualified under §192.227(a) --
(1) May not weld on pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20
percent or more of SMYS unless within the preceding 6 calendar months the welder has had one
weld tested and found acceptable under the sections 6 or 9 of API Standard 1104 (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7). Alternatively, welders may maintain an ongoing qualification status by
performing welds tested and found acceptable under the above acceptance criteria at least twice
each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 7½ months. A welder qualified under an earlier
edition of a standard listed in §192.7 of this part may weld but may not requalify under that earlier
edition; and
(2) May not weld on pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of less
than 20 percent of SMYS unless the welder is tested in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this
section or requalifies under paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section.
(d) A welder qualified under §192.227(b) may not weld unless --
(1) Within the preceding 15 calendar months, but at least once each calendar year, the
welder has requalified under §192.227(b); or
(2) Within the preceding 7½ calendar months, but at least twice each calendar year, the
welder has had --
(i) A production weld cut out, tested, and found acceptable in accordance with the
qualifying test; or
(ii) For welders who work only on service lines 2 inches (51 millimeters) or smaller in
diameter, two sample welds tested and found acceptable in accordance with the test in section III of
Appendix C of this part.
[Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975 with Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975; Amdt. 192-
37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction,
61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886,
June 14, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
A welding "process" is one element of a welding "procedure." Processes commonly used in pipeline welding
procedures include the following:
(a) Shielded metal-arc.
(b) Submerged arc.
(c) Gas tungsten-arc.
(d) Gas metal-arc.
(e) Flux-cored arc.
(f) Oxyacetylene.
(g) Flash.
§192.231
Protection from weather.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
The welding operation must be protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality
of the completed weld.
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.233
Miter joints.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
(a) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 30
percent or more of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 3 degrees.
(b) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of less
than 30 percent, but more than 10 percent, of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 12½ degrees
and must be a distance equal to one pipe diameter or more away from any other miter joint, as
measured from the crotch of each joint.
(c) A miter joint on steel pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 10
percent or less of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more than 90 degrees.
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.235
Preparation for welding.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
Before beginning any welding, the welding surfaces must be clean and free of any material that
may be detrimental to the weld, and the pipe or component must be aligned to provide the most
favorable condition for depositing the root bead. This alignment must be preserved while the root
bead is being deposited.
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 BUTT WELDS
Some acceptable end preparations are shown in Figures 192.235A and 192.235B of Guide Material
Appendix G-192-5.
2 FILLET WELDS
Minimum dimensions for fillet welds used in the attachment of slip-on flanges and for socket-welded
joints are shown in Figure 192.235C of Guide Material Appendix G-192-5. Similar minimum dimensions
for fillet welds used in branch connections are shown in Figures 192.155B and 192.155C of Guide
Material Appendix G-192-4.
3 SEAL WELDS
When threaded joints are seal-welded, the weld should not be considered as contributing to the
strength of the joint.
4 MITER WELDS
In making mitered joints, care should be taken to ensure proper groove spacing, alignment, and full
penetration. In cutting miter joints, the cutting torch should be held so that the entire cut surface is in the
same plane. The miter cut should be followed by a beveling cut, leaving 1/32 inch to 1/16 inch of
shoulder at the inner wall. The included angle of the resultant welding groove should be at least 60
degrees.
§192.237
(Removed.)
[Effective Date: 7-7-86]
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
§192.239
(Removed.)
[Effective Date: 7-7-86]
§192.241
Inspection and test of welds.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
[Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, 1975 with Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June 27, 1975; Amdt. 192-
37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction,
61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886,
June 14, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 VISUAL INSPECTION
The measures listed below should be performed at sufficient intervals to ensure good quality
workmanship. Consideration should be given to nondestructively testing, repairing, or cutting out any
weld with questionable acceptability under Section 9 of API Std 1104.
(a) Inspect the fit-up of a joint before the weld is made.
(b) Visually inspect the stringer bead before subsequent beads are applied. Each bead inspected
should be examined for defects that may make the weld unacceptable, such as:
(1) Incomplete fusion.
(2) Slag inclusion.
(3) Porosity.
(4) Cracks.
(c) Inspect the completed weld before coating.
2 INSPECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
(a) Inspection should be performed by qualified individuals with consideration given to the following.
(1) Experience.
(2) Training.
(3) Results of qualification examinations, if any.
(b) The documentation of inspector qualifications should be retained.
§192.243
Nondestructive testing.
[Effective Date: 7-8-96]
(a) Nondestructive testing of welds must be performed by any process, other than trepanning,
that will clearly indicate defects that may affect the integrity of the weld.
(b) Nondestructive testing of welds must be performed --
(1) In accordance with written procedures; and
(2) By persons who have been trained and qualified in the established procedures and with
the equipment employed in testing.
(c) Procedures must be established for the proper interpretation of each nondestructive test of
a weld to ensure the acceptability of the weld under §192.241(c).
(d) When nondestructive testing is required under §192.241(b), the following percentages of
each day's field butt welds, selected at random by the operator, must be nondestructively tested
over their entire circumference:
(1) In Class 1 locations, except offshore, at least 10 percent.
(2) In Class 2 locations, at least 15 percent.
(3) In Class 3 and Class 4 locations, at crossing of major or navigable rivers, offshore, and
§192.279
Copper pipe.
[Effective Date: 4-19-93]
Copper pipe may not be threaded except that copper pipe used for joining screw fittings or
valves may be threaded if the wall thickness is equivalent to the comparable size of Schedule 40 or
heavier wall pipe listed in Table C1 of ASME/ANSI B16.5.
[Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993]
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) Copper pipe may be joined by a mechanical joint or a brazed or soldered lap joint. The filler material
used for brazing should be a copper-phosphorous or a silver base alloy.
(b) Butt welds should not be used for joining copper pipe or copper tubing.
§192.281
Plastic pipe.
[Effective Date: 7-8-96]
(a) General. A plastic pipe joint that is joined by solvent cement, adhesive, or heat fusion may
not be disturbed until it has properly set. Plastic pipe may not be joined by a threaded joint or miter
joint.
(b) Solvent cement joints. Each solvent cement joint on plastic pipe must comply with the
following:
(1) The mating surfaces of the joint must be clean, dry, and free of material which might be
detrimental to the joint.
(2) The solvent cement must conform to ASTM Designation D 2513.
(3) The joint may not be heated to accelerate the setting of the cement.
(c) Heat-fusion joints. Each heat-fusion joint on plastic pipe must comply with the following:
(1) A butt heat-fusion joint must be joined by a device that holds the heater element square
to the ends of the piping, compresses the heated ends together, and holds the pipe in proper
alignment while the plastic hardens.
(2) A socket heat-fusion joint must be joined by a device that heats the mating surfaces of
the joint uniformly and simultaneously to essentially the same temperature.
(3) An electrofusion joint must be joined utilizing the equipment and techniques of the
fittings manufacturer or equipment and techniques shown, by testing joints to the requirements of
§192.283(a)(1)(iii), to be at least equivalent to those of the fittings manufacturer.
(4) Heat may not be applied with a torch or other open flame.
(d) Adhesive joints. Each adhesive joint on plastic pipe must comply with the following:
(1) The adhesive must conform to ASTM Designation D 2517.
(2) The materials and adhesive must be compatible with each other.
(e) Mechanical joints. Each compression type mechanical joint on plastic pipe must comply
with the following:
(1) The gasket material in the coupling must be compatible with the plastic.
(2) A rigid internal tubular stiffener, other than a split tubular stiffener, must be used in
conjunction with the coupling.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
99
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND §192.281
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition SUBPART F
[Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979 with Amdt. 192-34 Correction, 44 FR 50841, Aug. 30, 1979
and Amdt. 192-34 Correction, 44 FR 57100, Oct. 4, 1979; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21, 1988;
Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22, 1988; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192-78,
61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996]
GUIDE MATERIAL
To achieve sound joints in plastic piping requires skillful application of qualified procedures and the use
of proper materials and equipment in good condition. Joints should be made by personnel qualified by
training or experience in the written procedures required for the type of joint involved.
2 GENERAL (Plastic-to-plastic)
Plastic piping is joined by several material-specific joining methods including solvent cement, heat
fusion, and adhesives as described below. All plastic piping materials may be joined by mechanical
methods. The Regulations require that the joining procedures be qualified and that joining personnel
and inspectors be trained and qualified. (See §§192.281, 192.283, 192.285, and 192.287.)
For diameters greater than 2 inches, additional measures may be necessary to bottom the pipe.
The completed joint should be held together for sufficient time to prevent the pipe from backing out
of the fitting. After the joint is made, excess cement should be removed from the outside of the joint.
(e) The joint should not be subject to a pressure test until it has developed a high percentage of its
ultimate strength. The time required for this to occur varies with the type of cement, humidity, and
temperature.
(f) Other recommendations for making joints may be found in ASTM D 2855 (for PVC), the Appendix
of ASTM D 2235 (for ABS), and the Appendix of ASTM D 2560 (for CAB).
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3.2 Heat fusion for PA-to-PA and PE-to-PE only by externally applied heat. (Plastic-to-plastic)
(a) PA and PE cannot be fused to each other.
(b) General training programs that include both printed material and slides are available from the
Plastics Pipe Institute (see Guide Material Appendix G-192-1) and many manufacturers of plastic
pipe.
(c) Care should be used in the heating operation. The material should be sufficiently heated to
produce a sound joint but not overheated to the extent that the material is damaged.
(d) Square cut ends, free of burrs, are required for a proper joint.
(e) The mating surfaces should be clean, dry, and free of material which might be detrimental to the
joint.
(f) Other recommendations for making heat-fusion joints may be found in ASTM D 2657.
(g) PE piping of different compounds or grades can be heat fused to each other. Such joining should
not be undertaken indiscriminately, and should be undertaken only when qualified procedures for
joining the specific compounds are used. Suggested references are as follows.
(1) PPI TN-13, "General Guidelines for Butt, Saddle and Socket Fusion of Unlike Polyethylene
Pipes and Fittings."
(2) PPI TR-33, “Generic Butt Fusion Joining Procedure for Polyethylene Gas Pipe.”
(3) PPI TR-41, “Generic Saddle Fusion Joining Procedure for Polyethylene Gas Piping.”
(h) Rain, cold, and windy weather conditions can influence fusion quality. Modification of the
recommended heating time in the procedure should be given consideration during such conditions.
(i) For hot taps on PE, see the guide material under §192.123.
(j) The condition of equipment for heat fusing PE must conform to the equipment manufacturer's
recommended tolerances for acceptable wear of critical components. The use of damaged or worn
equipment may result in fusion joints that are weak or out of alignment. The frequency of inspection
should be determined by the operator based on equipment usage, equipment age and condition,
and manufacturer's recommendation. See Guide Material Appendix G-192-20 for a sample
inspection form.
(b) The following are references for joining plastic pipe by electrofusion.
(1) ASTM F 1055, "Standard Specification for Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside
Diameter Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing."
(2) ASTM F 1290, "Standard Practice for Electrofusion Joining Polyolefin Pipe and Fittings."
(3) PPI Technical Committee Project 141, "Standard Practice for Electrofusion Joining Polyolefin
Pipe and Fittings."
3.5 Mechanical joints for all plastic piping. (Plastic-to-plastic and plastic-to-metal)
(a) When compression type mechanical joints are used, the elastomeric gasket material in the fitting
should be compatible with the plastic; that is, neither the plastic nor the elastomer should cause
deterioration in chemical or mechanical properties to the other over a long period.
(b) A stiffener is required for thermoplastic piping. The tubular stiffener required to reinforce the end of
the pipe or tubing should extend at least under that section of the pipe compressed by the gasket or
gripping material. The stiffener should be free of rough or sharp edges that could damage the
piping. Stiffeners that fit the pipe or tube too tightly or too loosely may cause defective joining. The
operator should check with the manufacturer for recommendations.
(c) The pull-out resistance of compression-type fittings varies with the type and size of the fitting and
the wall thickness of the pipe being joined. ASTM D 2513 describes requirements for three
categories of mechanical fittings.
(1) Category 1 – full seal, full restraint. These types of mechanical fittings, when properly installed,
are designed to provide a joint that is stronger than the piping being connected.
(2) Category 2 – full seal, no restraint.
(3) Category 3 – full seal, partial restraint.
(d) All mechanical joints should be designed and installed to effectively sustain the longitudinal pull-out
forces caused by contraction of the piping and by maximum anticipated external loading. To
minimize these forces, practices such as the following should be used.
(1) With direct burial, snaking the pipe in the ditch when the pipe is sufficiently flexible.
(2) With insertion in a casing, pushing the pipe into place so that it is in compression rather than
tension.
(3) Allowing for the effect of thermal expansion and contraction of installed pipe due to seasonal
changes in the temperature. The importance of this allowance increases with the length of the
installation. This allowance may be accomplished by the following:
(i) Offsets.
(ii) Anchoring.
(iii) Strapping the joint.
(iv) Placing the pipe in slight axial compression.
(v) Expansion-contraction devices.
(vi) Fittings designed to prevent pull-out (ASTM D 2513, Categories 1 and 3).
(vii) Combinations of the above.
This allowance is of paramount importance when the plastic pipe is used for insertion inside
another pipe because it is not restrained. Coefficients of thermal expansion for thermoplastic
materials determined using ASTM D 696 are listed in Table 192.281i.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
PE 2406 9.0 0.108
PE 3408 9.0 0.108
PVC 1120 3.0 0.036
PVC 2116 4.0 0.048
1
Individual compounds may differ from the values in this table by as much as ±10 percent. More exact
values for specific commercial products may be obtained from the manufacturer.
PA = polyamide
PE = polyethylene
PVC = poly (vinyl chloride)
TABLE 192.281i
§192.283
Plastic pipe: Qualifying joining procedures.
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Heat fusion, solvent cement, and adhesive joints. Before any written procedure established
under §192.273(b) is used for making plastic pipe joints by a heat fusion, solvent cement, or
adhesive method, the procedure must be qualified by subjecting specimen joints made according to
the procedure to the following tests:
(1) The burst test requirements of --
(i) In the case of thermoplastic pipe, paragraph 6.6 (sustained pressure test) or
paragraph 6.7 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst Test) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained Static pressure Test) of
ASTM D2513 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7);
(ii) In the case of thermosetting plastic pipe, paragraph 8.5 (Minimum Hydrostatic
Burst Pressure) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained Static Pressure Test) of ASTM D2517 (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7);
or
(iii) In the case of electrofusion fittings for polyethylene pipe and tubing, paragraph 9.1
(Minimum Hydraulic Burst Pressure Test), paragraph 9.2 (Sustained Pressure Test), paragraph 9.3
(Tensile Strength Test), or paragraph 9.4 (Joint Integrity Tests) of ASTM Designation F1055
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7).
(2) For procedures intended for lateral pipe connections, subject a specimen joint made
from pipe sections joined at right angles according to the procedure to a force on the lateral pipe
until failure occurs in the specimen. If failure initiates outside the joint area, the procedure qualifies
for use; and
(3) For procedures intended for nonlateral pipe connections, follow the tensile test
requirements of ASTM D638 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), except that the test may be
conducted at ambient temperature and humidity. If the specimen elongates no less than 25 percent
or failure initiates outside the joint area, the procedure qualifies for use.
(b) Mechanical joints. Before any written procedure established under §192.273(b) is used for
making mechanical plastic pipe joints that are designed to withstand tensile forces, the procedure
must be qualified by subjecting 5 specimen joints made according to the procedure to the following
tensile test:
(1) Use an apparatus for the test as specified in ASTM D 638 (except for conditioning),
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7).
(2) The specimen must be of such length that the distance between the grips of the
apparatus and the end of the stiffener does not affect the joint strength.
(3) The speed of testing is 0.20 in (5.0 mm) per minute, plus or minus 25 percent.
(4) Pipe specimens less than 4 inches (102 mm) in diameter are qualified if the pipe yields to
an elongation of no less than 25 percent or failure initiates outside the joint area.
(5) Pipe specimens 4 inches (102 mm) and larger in diameter shall be pulled until the pipe is
subjected to a tensile stress equal to or greater than the maximum thermal stress that would be
produced by a temperature change of 100 oF (38 oC) or until the pipe is pulled from the fitting. If the
pipe pulls from the fitting, the lowest value of the five test results or the manufacturer's rating,
whichever is lower must be used in the design calculations for stress.
(6) Each specimen that fails at the grips must be retested using new pipe.
(7) Results obtained pertain only to the specific outside diameter, and material of the pipe
tested, except that testing of a heavier wall pipe may be used to qualify pipe of the same material but
with a lesser wall thickness.
(c) A copy of each written procedure being used for joining plastic pipe must be available to the
persons making and inspecting joints.
(d) Pipe or fittings manufactured before July 1, 1980, may be used in accordance with
procedures that the manufacturer certifies will produce a joint as strong as the pipe.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979 with Amdt. 192-34 Time Ext., 44 FR 50841, Aug.
30, 1979, Amdt. 192-34 Time Ext., 44 FR 57100, Oct. 4, 1979, Amdt. 192-34A, 45 FR 9931, Feb. 14,
1980, Amdt. 192-34B, 46 FR 39, Jan. 2, 1981, Amdt. 192-34 Correction, 47 FR 32720, July 29, 1982 and
Amdt. 192-34 Correction, 47 FR 49973, Nov. 4, 1982; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt.
192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt.
192-85,63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004 with Amdt. 192-94
Correction, 69 FR 54591, Sept. 9, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 WRITTEN PROCEDURES
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(a) An operator may elect to develop and qualify joining procedures or may follow the joining
procedures qualified by piping or fitting manufacturers. In either instance, the operator is
responsible for ensuring that the joining procedure used is qualified in accordance with the
requirements of §192.283.
(b) When a manufacturer's qualified joining procedure is used, the manufacturer should supply written
procedures, including pictures, demonstrating the appearance of satisfactory joints. Written
procedures for fitting installation are often packaged with each fitting.
(c) Qualified procedures should be in the operator’s installation manuals and may be printed on wallet
or shirt pocket cards, or made available by other means.
SUBPART G
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
FOR TRANSMISSION LINES AND MAINS
§192.301
Scope.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for constructing transmission lines and mains.
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.303
Compliance with specifications or standards.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
Each transmission line or main must be constructed in accordance with comprehensive written
specifications or standards that are consistent with this part.
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.305
Inspection: General.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
Each transmission line or main must be inspected to ensure that it is constructed in accordance
with this part.
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) Each operator should provide inspection by persons qualified by either experience or training. Inspection
should ensure that all work conforms to the operator’s specifications and to applicable federal, state,
and local requirements. The inspector should have the authority to order the repair or the removal and
replacement of any component that fails to meet the above requirements.
(b) The operator should assemble and retain all necessary records.
§192.307
Inspection of materials.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
Each length of pipe and each other component must be visually inspected at the site of
installation to ensure that it has not sustained any visually determinable damage that could impair
its serviceability.
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) Pipe and other components used in the construction of transmission lines and mains may be exposed
to possible damage during the handling and transportation required to reach the installation location.
Those performing the visual inspection at the installation site should be alert for such damage. Also,
care should be exercised to prevent handling damage during installation.
(b) Field inspections for gouged or grooved pipe should be performed just ahead of the coating operation
and during the lowering-in and backfill operations.
(c) Inspection should be made to determine that the coating machine does not cause harmful gouges or
grooves.
(d) Lacerations of the protective coating should be carefully examined prior to the repair of the coating to
see if the pipe surface has been damaged.
(e) All repairs, replacements, or changes should be inspected before they are covered.
(f) Since plastic piping and other components are susceptible to mishandling damage, special attention
should be given during the installation site inspection to detect cuts, gouges, scratches, kinks, and
similar imperfections.
§192.309
Repair of steel pipe.
[Effective Date: 1-13-00]
(a) Each imperfection or damage that impairs the serviceability of a length of steel pipe must be
repaired or removed. If a repair is made by grinding, the remaining wall thickness must at least be
equal to either:
(1) The minimum thickness required by the tolerances in the specification to which the pipe
was manufactured; or
(2) The nominal wall thickness required for the design pressure of the pipeline.
(b) Each of the following dents must be removed from steel pipe to be operated at a pressure
that produces a hoop stress of 20 percent, or more, of SMYS, unless the dent is repaired by a
method that reliable engineering tests and analyses show can permanently restore the serviceability
of the pipe:
(1) A dent that contains a stress concentrator such as a scratch, gouge, groove, or arc
burn.
(2) A dent that affects the longitudinal weld or a circumferential weld.
(3) In pipe to be operated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 40 percent or more
of SMYS, a dent that has a depth of --
110
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND §192.319
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition SUBPART G
3.4 Consolidation.
If trench flooding is used to consolidate the backfill, care should be taken to see that the pipe is not
floated from its firm bearing on the trench bottom. Where mains are installed in existing or proposed
roadways or in unstable soil, flooding should be augmented by wheel rolling or mechanical compaction.
Multi-lift mechanical compaction can be used in lieu of flooding.
§192.321
Installation of plastic pipe.
[Effective Date: 7-14-04]
(a) Plastic pipe must be installed below ground level except as provided by paragraphs (g) and
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996;
Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003; Amdt. 192-94,
69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL PRECAUTIONS
1.1 Handling.
Care should be taken to avoid rough handling of plastic pipe. It should not be dropped or have other
objects dropped upon it, nor should it be pushed or pulled over sharp projections. Caution should be
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
taken to prevent kinking or buckling. Any kinks or buckles that occur should be cut out as a cylinder.
1.3 Other.
(a) Plastic materials vary in their ability to resist damage from fire, heat, and chemicals. Care should be
exercised at all times to protect the pipe from these hazards.
(b) Plastic pipe should be adequately supported during storage. Thermoplastic pipe and fittings should
be protected from long-term exposure to direct sunlight. (See 2 of the guide material under
§192.59.)
2.1 Contraction.
The piping should be installed with sufficient slack to provide for possible contraction. Under high
temperature conditions, cooling may be necessary before the last connection is made. See 3.5(c)(3) of
the guide material under §192.281.
2.3 Backfilling.
(a) General. Blocking should not be used to support plastic pipe. Plastic pipe should be laid on
undisturbed soil, well-compacted soil, well-tamped soil, or other continuous support. If plastic pipe
is to be laid in soils that may damage it, the pipe should be protected by suitable rock-free
materials.
(b) Backfill material. Backfilling should be performed in a manner to provide firm support around the
piping. The material used for backfilling should be free of large rocks, pieces of pavement, or any
other materials that might damage the pipe.
(c) Consolidation. If trench flooding is used to consolidate the backfill, care should be taken to see that
the piping is not floated from its firm bearing on the trench bottom. Where mains and service lines
are installed in existing or proposed roadways or in unstable soil, flooding should be augmented by
wheel rolling or mechanical compaction. Multi-lift mechanical compaction can be used in lieu of
flooding. Care should be taken when using mechanical compaction not to cause excessive ovality
of the plastic pipe.
(3) Tracer wire should not be wrapped around plastic pipe. It may be taped to the outside of the
plastic pipe, especially for installation by boring or plowing-in, or placed loosely in the trench
directly adjacent to the pipe.
(4) A separation of 2" to 6" between plastic pipe and tracer wire is commonly used where current
surges, such as from lightning, have been experienced or can be expected.
(5) Leads from tracer wire into curb boxes and valve boxes and on outside service risers can be
used for direct connection of locating instruments. Consideration should be given to ensuring
that no bare tracer wire is exposed such that a lightning strike could cause a current surge
through the wire.
(6) Splicing of tracer wire, if necessary, should be done in a manner to produce an electrically and
mechanically sound joint that will not loosen or separate under conditions to which it may be
subjected such as backfilling operations and freeze-thaw cycles.
(7) Where the tracer wire is electrically connected to metallic structures (e.g., steel or cast iron
pipe) for reasons such as expanded locating capabilities or cathodic protection, consideration
should be given to the effects of electrical current surges on the ability to locate the plastic pipe
or the increased potential for damage.
(8) Additional information may be obtained from AGA XR0104, ”Plastic Pipe Manual for Gas
Service.”
(b) Metallic tape. A metallic coated or corrosion-resistant metallic tape may be installed along with the
plastic pipe. Care should be taken so that the tape is not torn or separated during backfilling
operations. Metallic locating tape normally has no accessible leads for connecting locating
equipment, making it necessary to use a passive or induced current locating device.
(c) Mapping. Accurate mapping of plastic pipe with dimensions referenced to permanent landmarks
such as lot lines or street centerlines is an acceptable method of locating plastic pipe.
(d) Passive devices. Tuned coils or other passive devices may be buried at strategic points along a
plastic pipeline. These devices can be located from above ground by means of an associated
locating instrument.
3.1 General.
(a) The casing or abandoned pipeline should be prepared to the extent necessary to remove any
sharp edges, projections, dust, welding slag, or abrasive material which could damage the plastic
during or after insertion.
(b) A support sleeve or plug should be used to prevent the plastic pipe from bearing on the end of the
casing or abandoned pipeline.
(c) Maps or other records should indicate plastic pipe that is inserted in a casing or an abandoned
pipeline.
(d) Cased plastic pipe can contract due to cold gas or low ambient temperature. See 3.5(c)(3) of the
guide material under §192.281.
(e) Where a gas leak migrating through the annular space between the plastic pipe and the casing or
abandoned pipeline could result in a hazardous condition, consideration should be given to
plugging the annular space at one or both ends. Plugs may also be provided at intermediate points
such as where the casing or abandoned pipeline is cut to permit the installation of a service tee or a
lateral main. Care should be used in the selection of the plugging material to avoid damage to the
plastic pipe. Both urethane foam and grout have been found to be effective for this purpose.
(f) If water that has accumulated between the casing or abandoned pipeline and the carrier pipe
freezes, the carrier pipe can be constricted (affecting the capacity) or damaged causing a leak. One
or more of the following steps can be taken to minimize this possibility.
(1) Sizing the pipe so that the formation of ice between the carrier and the casing or abandoned
pipeline will not constrict the carrier pipe to the extent that service is affected.
(2) Providing for drainage at the lower points in the casing or abandoned pipeline.
(3) Inserting a filler such as a closed cell foam material in the annular space.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4.1 General considerations.
The bends should be free of buckles, cracks, or other evidence of damage.
See Guide Material Appendix G-192-6 for damage prevention considerations while performing
directional drilling or using other trenchless technologies.
7.4 Valves.
Valves installed in aboveground plastic pipe should be braced or anchored, or the adjacent pipe
stiffened or reinforced, to decrease torque forces being transferred to the pipe during operation of the
valve.
§192.323
Casing.
[Effective Date: 11-12-70]
Each casing used on a transmission line or main under a railroad or highway must comply with
the following:
(a) The casing must be designed to withstand the superimposed loads.
(b) If there is a possibility of water entering the casing, the ends must be sealed.
(c) If the ends of an unvented casing are sealed and the sealing is strong enough to retain the
maximum allowable operating pressure of the pipe, the casing must be designed to hold this
pressure at a stress level of not more than 72 percent of SMYS.
(d) If vents are installed on a casing, the vents must be protected from the weather to prevent
water from entering the casing.
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) Where plastic piping must be cased or bridged, suitable precautions should be taken to prevent
crushing or shearing the piping. See guide material under §192.321.
(b) A reference for the design, installation, maintenance, repair, and monitoring of steel-cased pipelines is
NACE RP0200, “Steel-Cased Pipeline Practices.”
§192.325
Underground clearance.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
(a) Each transmission line must be installed with at least 12 inches (305 millimeters) of
clearance from any other underground structure not associated with the transmission line. If this
clearance cannot be attained, the transmission line must be protected from damage that might result
from the proximity of the other structure.
(b) Each main must be installed with enough clearance from any other underground structure
to allow proper maintenance and to protect against damage that might result from proximity to other
structures.
(c) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, each plastic
transmission line or main must be installed with sufficient clearance, or must be insulated from any
source of heat so as to prevent the heat from impairing the serviceability of the pipe.
(d) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder must be installed with a minimum clearance from any
other holder as prescribed in §192.175(b).
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 CLEARANCE
1.2 Mains.
Sufficient clearance should be maintained between mains and other underground structures to:
(a) Permit installation and operation of maintenance and emergency control devices, such as leak
clamps, pressure control fittings and pinching equipment.
(b) Permit installation of service laterals to both the mains and to other underground structures as
might be required.
(c) Provide heat damage protection from other underground facilities such as steam or electric power
lines, particularly where plastic piping is installed in common trenches with sources of heat.
(d) For additional methods of protection to ensure sufficient clearance, refer to 1.1(a) above.
SUBPART I
REQUIREMENTS FOR CORROSION CONTROL
§192.451
Scope.
[Effective Date: 9-5-78]
This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for the protection of metallic pipelines from
external, internal, and atmospheric corrosion.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt.
192-33, 43 FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.452
How does this subpart apply to converted pipelines and
regulated onshore gathering lines?
[Effective Date: 4-14-06]
(a) Converted pipelines. Notwithstanding the date the pipeline was installed or any earlier
deadlines for compliance, each pipeline which qualifies for use under this part in accordance with
§192.14 must meet the requirements of the subpart specifically applicable to pipelines installed
before August 1, 1971, and all other applicable requirements within 1 year after the pipeline is
readied for service. However, the requirements of this subpart specifically applicable to pipelines
installed after July 31, 1971, apply if the pipeline substantially meets those requirements before it is
readied for service or it is a segment that is replaced, relocated or substantially altered.
(b) Regulated onshore gathering lines. For any regulated onshore gathering line under §192.9
existing on April 14, 2006, that was not previously subject to this part, and for any onshore gathering
line that becomes a regulated onshore gathering line under §192.9 after April 14, 2006, because of a
change in class location or increase in dwelling density:
(1) The requirements of this subpart specifically applicable to pipelines installed before
August 1, 1971, apply to the gathering line regardless of the date the pipeline was actually installed;
and
(2) The requirements of this subpart specifically applicable to pipelines installed after July
31, 1971, apply only if the pipeline substantially meets those requirements.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25, 1977; Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15,2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
The operator should review the corrosion control records or perform field tests and surveys for the pipeline
to be converted to ensure that cathodic protection can be applied to the pipeline to meet the requirements of
Subpart I within 12 months of the conversion. The tests and surveys may include electrical surveys, pipe
examination, coating examination and soil tests. A record of the review or tests and surveys should be
maintained.
§192.453
General.
[Effective Date: 2-11-95]
The corrosion control procedures required by §192.605(b)(2), including those for the design,
installation, operation and maintenance of cathodic protection systems, must be carried out by, or
under the direction of, a person qualified in pipeline corrosion control methods.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6579, Feb. 11, 1994]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
Personnel responsible for directing the design, installation, operation, or maintenance of an operator’s
corrosion control systems should have knowledge of and practical experience in the following.
(a) Pipeline coatings.
(b) Cathodic protection systems (galvanic and impressed current).
(c) Stray current interference.
(d) Electrical isolation.
(e) Survey methods and evaluation techniques.
(f) Instruments used.
2 REFERENCE
A reference for the design and installation of cathodic protection systems is NACE RP0169, Sections 7
and 8.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
§192.455
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (f) of this section, each buried or submerged
pipeline installed after July 31, 1971, must be protected against external corrosion, including the
following:
(1) It must have an external protective coating meeting the requirements of §192.461.
(2) It must have a cathodic protection system designed to protect the pipeline in
accordance with this subpart, installed and placed in operation within 1 year after completion of
construction.
(b) An operator need not comply with paragraph (a) of this section, if the operator can
demonstrate by tests, investigation, or experience in the area of application, including, as a
minimum, soil resistivity measurements and tests for corrosion accelerating bacteria, that a
corrosive environment does not exist. However, within six months after an installation made
pursuant to the preceding sentence, the operator shall conduct tests, including pipe-to-soil potential
measurements with respect to either a continuous reference electrode or an electrode using close
spacing, not to exceed 20 feet (6 meters), and soil resistivity measurements at potential profile peak
locations, to adequately evaluate the potential profile along the entire pipeline. If the tests made
indicate that a corrosive condition exists, the pipeline must be cathodically protected in accordance
with subparagraph (a) (2) of this section.
(c) An operator need not comply with paragraph (a) of this section, if the operator can
demonstrate by tests, investigation, or experience that --
(1) For a copper pipeline, a corrosive environment does not exist; or
(2) For a temporary pipeline with an operating period of service not to exceed five years
beyond installation, corrosion during the five-year period of service of the pipeline will not be
detrimental to public safety.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, if a pipeline is
externally coated, it must be cathodically protected in accordance with subparagraph (a) (2) of this
section.
(e) Aluminum may not be installed in a buried or submerged pipeline if that aluminum is
4 REMEDIAL ACTION
(a) Common corrosion control methods include coating, cathodic protection, and electrical isolation.
Cathodic protection systems typically use galvanic anodes or impressed current (rectifiers). Other
corrosion control devices may include electrical isolators, interference bonds, diodes, and reverse
current switches.
(b) Remedial action is required whenever it is determined that the cathodic protection or other installed
corrosion control methods are not operating effectively.
(c) The specific remedial action to be taken depends on the type of corrosion control method installed
and the problem encountered. In certain situations, the deficiency can be corrected by modifying
existing corrosion control methods (e.g., increasing output from adjacent rectifiers).
(d) Operators are required to take prompt remedial action to correct deficiencies indicated by
monitoring. Remedial action should correct the deficiency before the next monitoring cycle required
by §192.465. However, for monitoring cycles greater than one year, remedial action should be
completed within 15 months of discovery.
Example: It is discovered that pipe coating has deteriorated and that the existing corrosion control
system is unable to achieve the desired cathodic protection level. The operator should initiate and
document action taken to achieve the acceptable cathodic protection level before the next
monitoring cycle. Remedial action might include the following.
(1) Installing additional cathodic protection,
(2) Recoating the pipe to meet the requirements of §192.461, or
(3) Replacing the pipe.
(e) If remedial action cannot be completed prior to the next scheduled monitoring cycle, the operator
should document the actions taken to correct the deficiency and the expected timeframe for
completion.
Noncathodically protected pipelines are required to be reevaluated at intervals not exceeding three
years to identify areas of "active" corrosion in accordance with §192.465(e). Electrical surveys must be
utilized, except as follows:
(a) Where electrical survey is impractical, the study of failures, leakage history, corrosion, class
location hazard to the public and unusual operating/maintenance conditions may be utilized to
evaluate the need for protection.
(b) Where the pipeline is remotely located or otherwise determined that corrosion caused leaks would
not be a detriment to public safety.
(1) "Active" corrosion areas. See guide material under §192.457.
Non-cathodically protected pipelines in which "active" corrosion is found are required to be
cathodically protected and monitored in accordance with §§192.463 and 192.465(a). See 3
above.
(2) "Non-active" corrosion areas. See guide material under §192.457.
Non-cathodically protected pipelines containing "non-active" corrosion need to be reevaluated
at intervals not exceeding three years in accordance with §192.465(e).
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
§192.467
External corrosion control: Electrical isolation.
[Effective Date: 9-5-78]
(a) Each buried or submerged pipeline must be electrically isolated from other underground
metallic structures, unless the pipeline and the other structures are electrically interconnected and
cathodically protected as a single unit.
(b) One or more insulating devices must be installed where electrical isolation of a portion of a
pipeline is necessary to facilitate the application of corrosion control.
(c) Except for unprotected copper inserted in ferrous pipe, each pipeline must be electrically
isolated from metallic casings that are a part of the underground system. However, if isolation is not
achieved because it is impractical, other measures must be taken to minimize corrosion of the
pipeline inside the casing.
(d) Inspection and electrical tests must be made to assure that electrical isolation is adequate.
(e) An insulating device may not be installed in an area where a combustible atmosphere is
anticipated unless precautions are taken to prevent arcing.
(f) Where a pipeline is located in close proximity to electrical transmission tower footings,
ground cables or counterpoise, or in other areas where fault currents or unusual risk of lightning
may be anticipated, it must be provided with protection against damage due to fault currents or
lightning, and protective measures must also be taken at insulating devices.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971; Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978]
GUIDE MATERIAL
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) Devices that can be used to monitor internal corrosion or the effectiveness of corrosion mitigation
measures include hydrogen probes, corrosion probes, corrosion coupons, test spools, and
nondestructive testing equipment capable of indicating loss in wall thickness.
(b) Consideration should be given to the site selection and the type of access station used to expose the
device to on-stream monitoring. It is desirable to incorporate a retractable feature in the monitoring
station to avoid facility shutdowns during periodic inspections, such as weight loss measurements, and
for on-stream pigging of the facility.
(c) A written procedure should be established to determine that the monitoring device is operating properly.
(d) See guide material under §192.475 if internal corrosion is discovered or is not under mitigation.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
§192.479
Atmospheric corrosion control: General.
[Effective Date: 10-15-03]
(a) Each operator must clean and coat each pipeline or portion of pipeline that is exposed to
the atmosphere, except pipelines under paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Coating material must be suitable for the prevention of atmospheric corrosion.
(c) Except portions of pipelines in offshore splash zones or soil-to-air interfaces, the operator
need not protect from atmospheric corrosion any pipeline for which the operator demonstrates by
test, investigation, or experience appropriate to the environment of the pipeline that corrosion will--
(1) Only be a light surface oxide; or
(2) Not affect the safe operation of the pipeline before the next scheduled inspection.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971; Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt.
192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL
(a) The need for coating can be determined by experience in the same or essentially identical
environment.
(b) The degree of surface preparation, the selection of the coating materials, and the application
procedures must be selected to achieve the desired coating system life span. A reference is the
SSPC Painting Manual ("Good Painting Practice" - Volume 1; and "Systems and Specifications" -
Volume 2), which is published by the Steel Structures Painting Council.
(c) See guide material under §192.481 for determining areas of atmospheric corrosion.
The following methods should be considered for exposed piping and related facilities.
(a) Use of coating. See 1 above.
(b) Selection of corrosion resistant materials.
(c) Avoidance of areas where prevailing winds or other conditions will deposit corrosive materials
(such as salt, moisture, or industrial effluent). Protection in these areas can be provided by
selecting a more appropriate meter and regulator location or by using a protective housing.
(d) Use of materials or coatings or both suitable for the environment may be required for facilities
installed in pits, vaults, or casings and that may be periodically submerged or exposed to excessive
condensation.
(e) Protection of regulator vent lines from plugging by corrosion products. Where practical, the vent line
should be installed in a self-drain position and, where necessary, extended above possible flood
level.
(f) Use of material for vent tubing that is compatible with the environment encountered. For example,
some kinds of plastic tubing should not be exposed to direct sunlight, and certain aluminum alloys
should not be submerged or placed in contact with concrete.
§192.481
Atmospheric corrosion control: Monitoring.
[Effective Date: 10-15-03]
(a) Each operator must inspect each pipeline or portion of pipeline that is exposed to the
atmosphere for evidence of atmospheric corrosion, as follows:
(b) During inspections the operator must give particular attention to pipe at soil-to-air
interfaces, under thermal insulation, under disbonded coatings, at pipe supports, in splash zones, at
deck penetrations, and in spans over water.
(c) If atmospheric corrosion is found during an inspection, the operator must provide
protection against the corrosion as required by §192.479.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt.
192-33, 43 FR 39389, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) The presence of atmospheric corrosion can be detected best by visual inspection.
(1) This may require ladders, scaffolds, hoists, or other suitable means of permitting inspector
access to the structure being inspected. In addition to the locations listed in §192.481(b),
attention should be given to locations such as clamps, rest plates, and sleeved openings.
(2) Piping that is thermally or acoustically insulated (jacketed) should be inspected wherever
practical. To minimize damage to the insulation, a visual inspection of the pipe may be
performed by cutting windows into the insulation.
(a) During the filling and dewatering processes, significant and sudden variations in pressure may
occur within the pipeline and the temporary filling and dewatering piping. These variations can be
caused by changes in velocity of the pig passing through bends in the pipeline or of the pig and
water due to changes in pipeline elevation. Compressed air escaping around a pig can also create
a source for stored energy within the pipeline. The release of this stored energy, as well as surges
transferred from the pipeline to the temporary filling and dewatering piping, can result in pipe
movement.
(b) When conducting a hydrostatic test, the following should be considered when filling and dewatering
pipelines.
(1) Prepare a detailed test plan that includes the required equipment, test duration, and test
pressure.
(2) Conduct training for the individuals involved with the test that includes a review of the test and
dewatering plan, instructions on the filling/dewatering system installation and techniques, and
proper coupling and anchoring methods.
(3) Perform an engineering analysis of the existing and temporary piping systems to identify the
forces that could adversely affect the integrity of the pipeline or the stability of the drainage
components, such as excessive or variable pressures caused by a stuck pig or leaks.
(4) Develop installation techniques, including effective anchoring systems, that address expected
forces to be experienced during the test, and ensure that they are implemented during filling
and dewatering operations.
(5) Inspect temporary pipe, couplings, and fittings to ensure they are in good condition and rated
for the pressure and temperature conditions specified for the test.
(6) Ensure that anchoring and support systems are installed in accordance with the plan.
(7) Control access to the area around the test site by establishing a limited-access zone to keep
out persons not involved with the test.
(c) See OPS Advisory Bulletin ADB-04-01 (69 FR 58225, Sept. 29, 2004) for additional background
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Each operator, in fulfilling the local, state, and federal environmental regulations with respect to the
disposal of the test medium, should, among other things, give consideration to the following.
(a) Selecting water from satisfactory sources.
(b) Mitigating erosion and flooding of the area where the water is being discharged.
(c) Using filters, impoundment facilities or other appropriate methods to ensure that the atmosphere
and the surface waters are not unnecessarily contaminated by the products being discharged.
(d) Using silencers, during the blowdown operation, where sound might be generated which is
objectionable to area residents.
(e) Scheduling and locating the blowdown to minimize public objection to the noise generated.
§192.517
Records.
[Effective Date: 10-15-03]
(a) Each operator shall make, and retain for the useful life of the pipeline, a record of each test
performed under §§192.505 and 192.507. The record must contain at least the following information:
(1) The operator's name, the name of the operator's employee responsible for making the
test, and the name of any test company used.
(2) Test medium used.
(3) Test pressure.
(4) Test duration.
(5) Pressure recording charts, or other record of pressure readings.
(6) Elevation variations, whenever significant for the particular test.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GUIDE MATERIAL
(a) For tests conducted under §§192.509, 192.511, or 192.513, records are required to show that the
tests have been conducted. The date, location of the test, and the test pressure applied may be
sufficient documentation. Additional information may be included at the discretion of the operator.
(b) For segments of steel service line stressed to 20 percent or more of SMYS (§192.511(c)), records
are required to document testing in accordance with §192.507.
(B) Ductile iron fittings were cast from grade (70-50-05) ductile iron and conform to the
requirements of ANSI A21.14-1989.
(2) Useful references for performing the analysis include the following.
(i) For cast iron pipe, the design formulas in AWWA C101-67 (withdrawn 1982) and for
ductile iron pipe, AWWA C150/A21.50-81 (R86).
(ii) For wall thickness determination of cast iron pipe, the standard thickness listed in tables
1-3 and 1-7 of AWWA C101-67.
(iii) For wall thickness determination of ductile iron pipe, the standard thickness listed in table
50.5 of AWWA C150/A21.50-81.
(c) A review of leakage, corrosion, operating pressure and maintenance history to ascertain the
present condition of facilities.
(d) An analysis of the effect of the ultimate separation and uprating on adjoining facilities.
2.3 Monitoring.
Provision should be made for monitoring field pressures prior to and during uprating to ensure the
integrity of both the system to be uprated and the adjacent systems that might be affected by the
uprating.
2.4 Interface.
The necessary field work should be performed to provide positive control to avoid overpressuring the
sections of the systems that are not being uprated. Control procedures may involve actual physical
separation of sections, installation of regulator equipment that is properly operated and set to control at
the proper pressure, or other effective means of separation.
3 INCREASING PRESSURE
3.1 Communications.
Lines of communication should be established between all control points.
183
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND §192.557
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition SUBPART K
3.2 Isolation.
The system should be isolated from all lower pressure systems.
3.7 Monitoring.
The pressure in adjacent facilities should be monitored during the uprating procedure to establish:
(a) That no connection is acting as a source of unregulated gas from the higher pressure segment to
the lower pressure system; and
(b) The adequacy of the remaining lower pressure system at points of separation and other locations.
4 RECORDS
The records of investigations, the work, and the testing should be forwarded to the proper department
for retention for the life of the facility.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Actions that may be initiated by the first employee arriving at the scene in order to protect people and
property should be described. These actions may include the following.
(a) Determining the scope of the emergency.
(b) Evacuating and preventing access to premises that are or may be affected.
(c) Preventing accidental ignition.
(d) Reporting to the appropriate supervisor on the situation, and requesting further instructions or
assistance if needed.
should also be given to other methods of stopping gas flow (such as injecting viscous materials or
polyurethane foam through drip risers or any other available connections to the main, or through
the use of squeezing or bagging-off techniques).
(6) Emergency supply connections with other gas companies and procedures for making use of
such connections.
(7) List of contractors, other utilities, and municipalities that have agreed to provide equipment
and workmen to assist with repair and service restoration. Procedures for securing and
utilizing this manpower and equipment should be described.
3.4 Plan with public officials and operators of facilities in the vicinity of the pipeline for mutual assistance.
(a) Operator personnel should establish and maintain liaison with appropriate fire, police, and other
public officials and operators of facilities in the vicinity of the pipeline to plan how to engage in
mutual assistance to minimize hazards to life and property. This planning should include how to
work together effectively in an Incident Command System. Consideration should be given to
various situations including the following.
(1) Situations where the operator has reason to believe a hazard may exist and where other
emergency personnel, such as fire and police, may be able to respond more quickly than
operator personnel. Police and fire department personnel should take action toward protecting
the public by means of evacuation and building ventilation where needed, pending the arrival
of operator personnel.
(2) Situations that involve the evacuation of buildings and properties.
(i) Advise police and fire departments that operator personnel may need to conduct leak
investigations inside buildings and on properties within the area of the emergency.
(ii) The operator, police department, and fire department should plan for access to
evacuated buildings and properties. The plan should include provisions to instruct
personnel in charge of evacuated buildings and properties to provide a means of access
when required.
(3) Situations where the operation of electric or other utilities located in the vicinity of the pipeline
may provide sources of ignition for the gas released, may increase burning time or intensity of
fires that have already started, or may delay responders who are attempting to make the
situation safe.
(4) Means of ensuring that communication is ongoing during the emergency response so that
pertinent information is shared in a timely manner.
(b) The gas characteristics and properties, such as pressure, specific gravity, gas odor, and
flammability limits, should be provided to emergency response officials. The implications of these
characteristics and properties on emergency response decisions should be thoroughly discussed.
In discussions with emergency response officials, the operator should emphasize the following.
(1) The importance of this information to outside emergency response personnel arriving before
the operator's personnel.
(2) The use of this information in making decisions, such as areas to be evacuated, traffic
rerouting, and control of ignition sources.
(3) The importance of gas detectors in properly responding to an incident.
§192.616
Public awareness.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(a) Each pipeline operator must develop and implement a written continuing public education
program that follows the guidance provided in the American Petroleum Institute’s (API)
Recommended Practice (RP) 1162 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7).
(b) The operator’s program must follow the general program recommendations of API RP 1162
and assess the unique attributes and characteristics of the operator’s pipeline and facilities.
(c) The operator must follow the general program recommendations, including baseline and
supplemental requirements of API RP 1162, unless the operator provides justification in its program
or procedural manual as to why compliance with all or certain provisions of the recommended
practice is not practicable and not necessary for safety.
(d) The operator’s program must specifically include provisions to educate the public,
appropriate government organizations, and persons engaged in excavation related activities on:
(1) Use of a one-call notification system prior to excavation and other damage prevention
activities;
(2) Possible hazards associated with unintended releases from a gas pipeline facility;
(3) Physical indications that such a release may have occurred;
(4) Steps that should be taken for public safety in the event of a gas pipeline release; and
(5) Procedures for reporting such an event.
(e) The program must include activities to advise affected municipalities, school districts,
businesses, and residents of pipeline facility locations.
(f) The program and the media used must be as comprehensive as necessary to reach all areas
in which the operator transports gas.
(g) The program must be conducted in English and in other languages commonly understood
by a significant number and concentration of the non-English speaking population in the operator’s
area.
(h) Operators in existence on June 20, 2005, must have completed their written programs no
later than June 20, 2006. As an exception, operators of small propane distribution systems having
less than 25 customers and master meter operators having less than 25 customers must have
completed development and documentation of their programs no later than June 20, 2007. Upon
request, operators must submit their completed programs to PHMSA or, in the case of an intrastate
pipeline facility operator, the appropriate State agency.
(i) The operator’s program documentation and evaluation results must be available for periodic
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6579, Feb. 11, 1994; Amdt. 192-99, 70 FR 28833, May 19, 2005 with
Amdt. 192-99 Correction, 70 FR 35041, June 16, 2005; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL
The educational program called for under this section should be tailored to the type of pipeline
operation and the environment traversed by the pipeline and should be conducted in each language
that is significant in the community or area. Operators should communicate their programs to
consumers, the general public including non-consumers, appropriate government officials, operators of
facilities in the vicinity of the pipeline (e.g., telephone, electric, gas, cable, water, sewer and
railroads), and excavators in their area. See 2.3 and 2.4 of the guide material under §192.614 for other
related information.
Operators of transmission systems should communicate their programs to residences and businesses
along their pipeline rights-of-way, with a request that landlords and employers provide the information to
their tenants and employees. The extent of program coverage may vary depending on the location of
the transmission pipeline with respect to occupants of residences and businesses. In determining the
scope of the operator’s communication, the likelihood that the occupant would be able to recognize a
pipeline emergency on the rights-of-way should be considered. Distance, terrain, other homes, or
buildings between the occupant and the pipeline are factors that influence the ability to recognize a
pipeline emergency. The programs and media used should be as comprehensive as necessary to
reach all areas through which the operator transports gas. The programs of operators in the same area
should be coordinated to properly direct reports of emergencies and to avoid inconsistencies.
When a detailed analysis is to be made, a person at the scene of the incident should be designated to
coordinate the investigation. That person's responsibilities should include the following.
(a) Acting as a coordinator for all field investigative personnel.
(b) Maintaining a log of the personnel, equipment, and witnesses.
(c) Recording in chronological order the events as they take place.
(d) Ensuring that photographs are taken of the incident and surrounding areas. These photographs
may be of great value in the investigation.
(e) Ensuring the notification of all appropriate governmental authorities.
(f) Ensuring the preservation of evidence.
4 INVESTIGATION TEAM
When a detailed analysis is to be made, a fully qualified investigation team should be designated. The
investigation team should be qualified either by training or experience in the proper procedures for
investigation of an incident. The investigation should include the following.
(a) Determination of the probable cause of the incident.
(b) Evaluation of the initial response to the incident.
(c) The need for system improvements if necessary.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(d) The need for improvements in response, management and investigation of incidents.
5 SPECIMENS
A procedure should be prepared for selecting, collecting, preserving, labeling, and handling of
specimens. Procedures for collecting plastic or metallurgical specimens should include precautions
against changing the granular structure in the areas of investigatory interest (e.g., avoid heat effects
from cutting and outside forces due to tools and equipment). When corrosion may be involved,
procedures may be necessary for proper sampling and handling of soil and ground water specimens.
Procedures controlling the cutting, cleaning, lifting, identifying, and shipping of pipe specimens should
be considered for preservation of valuable evidence on the pipe surface, and on any tear surface or
fracture face, including making cuts far enough from the failure to avoid damaging critical areas of the
specimen.
The number of specimens needed to be collected at the failure site may vary depending on the type
and number of tests anticipated. A series of independent or destructive tests may require multiple
specimens. If there is a need to confirm the pipe materials specifications, then additional pipe
specimens should be obtained near the failure, but in an area of the piping where the physical
properties and characteristics are unaffected by the failure itself. Other investigatory procedures may be
utilized to confirm pipe material specifications.
Recognized standard destructive and non-destructive techniques are the preferred means to examine
test specimens. The testing methods used should be suited to the particular material being tested, and
be pertinent to the failure investigation.
Analysis and data on failures should be compiled and reviewed. The need for continuing surveillance of
pipeline facilities should be determined. See the guide material under §192.613.
7 REFERENCES
(a) "First at the Scene" by J.M. Lennon, Director of Claims, Philadelphia Electric Company; AGA
Operating Section Proceedings - 1983.
(b) "How to Protect the Company at the Scene of an Incident" by Robert E. Kennedy, Director of
Claims, Claim & Security Department, The Brooklyn Union Gas Company; AGA Operating Section
Proceedings - 1983.
(c) NFPA 921, "Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations."
(d) NACE RP0173, "Collection and Identification of Corrosion Products" (Discontinued).
§192.619
What is the maximum allowable operating pressure for
steel or plastic pipelines?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate a segment of
steel or plastic pipeline at a pressure that exceeds the lowest of the following:
(1) The design pressure of the weakest element in the segment, determined in accordance
with subparts C and D of this part. However, for steel pipe in pipelines being converted under
§192.14 or uprated under subpart K of this part, if any variable necessary to determine the design
pressure under the design formula (§192.105) is unknown, one of the following pressures is to be
used as design pressure:
(i) Eighty percent of the first test pressure that produces yield under section N5 of
Appendix N of ASME B31.8 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), reduced by the appropriate
factor in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section; or
(ii) If the pipe is 12¾ inches (324 mm) or less in outside diameter and is not tested to
yield under this paragraph, 200 p.s.i. (1379 kPa).
(2) The pressure obtained by dividing the pressure to which the segment was tested after
construction as follows:
(i) For plastic pipe in all locations, the test pressure is divided by a factor of 1.5.
(ii) For steel pipe operated at 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage or more, the test pressure is
divided by a factor determined in accordance with the following table:
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
location
Installed before Installed after Converted
(Nov. 12, 1970) (Nov. 11, 1970) under §192.14
1 1.1 1.1 1.25
2 1.25 1.25 1.25
3 1.4 1.5 1.5
4 1.4 1.5 1.5
1
For offshore segments installed, uprated or converted after July 31, 1977, that are not
located on an offshore platform, the factor is 1.25. For segments installed, uprated or
converted after July 31, 1977, that are located on an offshore platform or on a platform in
inland navigable waters, including a pipe riser, the factor is 1.5.
(3) The highest actual operating pressure to which the segment was subjected during the
5 years preceding the applicable date in the second column. This pressure restriction applies
unless the segment was tested according to the requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this section
after the applicable date in the third column or the segment was uprated according to the
requirements in subpart K of this part:
(4) The pressure determined by the operator to be the maximum safe pressure after
considering the history of the segment, particularly known corrosion and the actual operating
pressure.
(b) No person may operate a segment to which paragraph (a)(4) of this section is applicable,
unless over-pressure protective devices are installed on the segment in a manner that will prevent
the maximum allowable operating pressure from being exceeded, in accordance with §192.195.
(c) The requirements on pressure restrictions in this section do not apply in the following
instance. An operator may operate a segment of pipeline found to be in satisfactory condition,
considering its operating and maintenance history, at the highest actual operating pressure to
which the segment was subjected during the 5 years preceding the applicable date in the second
column of the table in paragraph (a)(3) of this section. An operator must still comply with
§192.611.
[Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17659, Nov. 17, 1970; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976 with Amdt.
192-27A, 41 FR 47252, Oct. 28, 1976; Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25, 1977; Amdt. 192-78, 61
FR 28770, June 6, 1996 with Amdt. 192-78 Correction, 61 FR 30824, June 18, 1996; Amdt. 192-85,
63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-102, 71 FR 13289, Mar. 15, 2006; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR
33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.621
Maximum allowable operating pressure: High-pressure distribution systems.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
(a) No person may operate a segment of a high pressure distribution system at a pressure that
exceeds the lowest of the following pressures, as applicable:
(1) The design pressure of the weakest element in the segment, determined in accordance
with Subparts C and D of this part.
(2) 60 p.s.i. (414 kPa) gage, for a segment of a distribution system otherwise designed to
operate at over 60 p.s.i.g., unless the service lines in the segment are equipped with service
regulators or other pressure limiting devices in series that meet the requirements of §192.197(c).
(3) 25 p.s.i. (172 kPa) gage in segments of cast iron pipe in which there are unreinforced
bell and spigot joints.
(4) The pressure limits to which a joint could be subjected without the possibility of its
parting.
(5) The pressure determined by the operator to be the maximum safe pressure after
considering the history of the segment, particularly known corrosion and the actual operating
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
pressures.
(b) No person may operate a segment of pipeline to which paragraph (a) (5) of this section
applies, unless overpressure protective devices are installed on the segment in a manner that will
prevent the maximum allowable operating pressure from being exceeded, in accordance with
§192.195.
GUIDE MATERIAL
For high pressure distribution systems containing steel or plastic pipelines, see §192.619.
§192.623
Maximum and minimum allowable operating pressure:
Low-pressure distribution systems.
[Effective Date: 4-26-96]
(a) No person may operate a low-pressure distribution system at a pressure high enough to
make unsafe the operation of any connected and properly adjusted low-pressure gas burning
equipment.
(b) No person may operate a low pressure distribution system at a pressure lower than the
minimum pressure at which the safe and continuing operation of any connected and properly
adjusted low-pressure gas burning equipment can be assured.
[Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996 with Amdt. 192-75 Correction, 61 FR 38403, July 24, 1996]
(b) Valves should be operated to the extent necessary to establish operability during an emergency.
When operating the valve, precautions should be taken to avoid a service outage or
overpressurization of the system.
(c) When maintenance is completed, the operator should verify that the valves are in the proper
position.
(d) When inspecting or maintaining valves, the location reference data contained in the operator's
records should be compared with field conditions. Changes, such as referenced landmarks, street
alignment, and topography, should be noted and incorporated in the records.
2 INOPERABLE VALVES
§192.747
Valve maintenance: Distribution systems.
[Effective Date: 10-15-03]
(a) Each valve, the use of which may be necessary for the safe operation of a distribution
system, must be checked and serviced at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each
calendar year.
(b) Each operator must take prompt remedial action to correct any valve found inoperable,
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
GUIDE MATERIAL
Valves should be checked for adequate lubrication and proper alignment to permit the use of a key,
wrench, handle, or other operating device. Where applicable, the valve box or vault should be cleared
of any debris that would interfere with or delay the operation of the valve.
2 PRECAUTIONS
3 INOPERABLE VALVES
(a) See §192.181 for additional information on identifying valves necessary for the safe operation of a
distribution system.
(b) See the guide material under §192.745 regarding verification of records with current field data.
§192.749
Vault maintenance.
[Effective Date: 7-13-98]
(a) Each vault housing pressure regulating and pressure limiting equipment, and having a
volumetric internal content of 200 cubic feet (5.66 cubic meters) or more, must be inspected at
intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year, to determine that it is in
good physical condition and adequately ventilated.
(b) If gas is found in the vault, the equipment in the vault must be inspected for leaks, and any
leaks found must be repaired.
(c) The ventilating equipment must also be inspected to determine that it is functioning
properly.
(d) Each vault cover must be inspected to assure that it does not present a hazard to public
safety.
[Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 APPLICABILITY
The following procedures apply primarily to vaults that have restricted openings (e.g., manholes) or are
more than four feet deep. However, an operator should review the following procedures and select
those that, for its particular situation, are applicable to vaults that have full opening covers and are less
than four feet deep.
(ii)
The impact of water displacement on liquid hydrocarbons in those instances where water
may enter into the pipeline segment.
(c) Monitoring isolated segments.
(1) Monitoring procedures should be established based on the pressure, volumes, closures, and
other pertinent factors.
(2) Personnel assigned to operate isolation equipment should have a means to determine
pressure build-ups, such as gauges and vents.
(3) Personnel monitoring at remote locations should have communication with the work site and
the individual in charge of the operation.
5 REFERENCE
A reference is AGA XR0104, ”Plastic Pipe Manual for Gas Service," Chapter VI – Maintenance,
Operation and Emergency Control Procedures.
§192.753
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Caulked bell and spigot joints.
\ [Effective Date: 10-15-03]
(a) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot joint that is subject to pressures of more than 25 psi
(172 kPa) gage must be sealed with:
(1) A mechanical leak clamp; or
(2) A material or device which:
(i) Does not reduce the flexibility of the joint;
(ii) Permanently bonds, either chemically or mechanically, or both, with the bell and
spigot metal surfaces or adjacent pipe metal surfaces; and
(iii) Seals and bonds in a manner that meets the strength, environmental, and chemical
compatibility requirements of §§192.53(a) and (b) and 192.143.
(b) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot joint that is subject to pressures 25 psi (172 kPa)
gage or less and is exposed for any reason must be sealed by a means other than caulking.
[Amdt. 192-25, 41 FR 23679, June 11, 1976; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93,
68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.755
Protecting cast-iron pipelines.
[Effective Date: 6-1-76]
When an operator has knowledge that the support for a segment of a buried cast-iron pipeline is
disturbed:
(a) That segment of the pipeline must be protected, as necessary, against damage during the
disturbance by:
(1) Vibrations from heavy construction equipment, trains, trucks, buses, or blasting;
(2) Impact forces by vehicles;
(3) Earth movement;
(4) Apparent future excavations near the pipeline; or
(5) Other foreseeable outside forces that may subject that segment of the pipeline to
bending stress.
(b) As soon as feasible, appropriate steps must be taken to provide permanent protection for
the disturbed segment from damage that might result from external loads, including compliance
with applicable requirements of §§192.317(a), 192.319, and 192.361(b) -- (d).
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.761
(Removed.)
[Effective Date: 2-14-04]
SUBPART O
GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
§192.901
What do the regulations in this subpart cover?
[Effective Date: 2-14-04]
This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for an integrity management program on any
gas transmission pipeline covered under this part. For gas transmission pipelines constructed of
plastic, only the requirements in §§192.917, 192.921, 192.935 and 192.937 apply.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL
The requirements of Subpart O apply to all transmission pipelines including compressor stations,
metering stations, regulator stations, valve sets, and other fabricated assemblies. The requirements of
Subpart O do not apply to distribution lines or to gathering lines.
Table 192.901i identifies the applicability of each section of Subpart O to plastic line pipe, steel line pipe
and pipeline components. In the table, “Components” refers to gas-carrying components other than line
pipe that are typically above ground, such as compressor stations, meter stations, and regulator
stations.
APPLICABILITY OF SUBPART O
TABLE 192.901i
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
TABLE 192.901i
§192.903
What definitions apply to this subpart?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
Direct assessment is an integrity assessment method that utilizes a process to evaluate certain
threats (i.e., external corrosion, internal corrosion and stress corrosion cracking) to a covered
pipeline segment’s integrity. The process includes the gathering and integration of risk factor data,
indirect examination or analysis to identify areas of suspected corrosion, direct examination of the
pipeline in these areas, and post assessment evaluation.
High consequence area means an area established by one of the methods described in
paragraphs (1) or (2) as follows:
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(1) An area defined as —
(i) A Class 3 location under §192.5; or
(ii) A Class 4 location under §192.5; or
(iii) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 location where the potential impact radius is
greater than 660 feet (200 meters), and the area within a potential impact circle contains 20 or more
buildings intended for human occupancy; or
(iv) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 location where the potential impact circle contains
an identified site.
(2) The area within a potential impact circle containing —
(i) 20 or more buildings intended for human occupancy, unless the exception in
paragraph (4) applies; or
(ii) An identified site.
(3) Where a potential impact circle is calculated under either method (1) or (2) to establish a
high consequence area, the length of the high consequence area extends axially along the length of
the pipeline from the outermost edge of the first potential impact circle that contains either an
identified site or 20 or more buildings intended for human occupancy to the outermost edge of the
last contiguous potential impact circle that contains either an identified site or 20 or more buildings
intended for human occupancy. (See Figure E.I.A. in Appendix E.)
(4) If in identifying a high consequence area under paragraph (1)(iii) of this definition or
paragraph (2)(i) of this definition, the radius of the potential impact circle is greater than 660 feet (200
meters), the operator may identify a high consequence area based on a prorated number of
buildings intended for human occupancy within a distance 660 feet (200 meters) from the centerline
of the pipeline until December17, 2006. If an operator chooses this approach, the operator must
prorate the number of buildings intended for human occupancy based on the ratio of an area with a
radius of 660 feet (200 meters) to the area of the potential impact circle (i.e., the prorated number of
buildings intended for human occupancy is equal to [20 x (660 feet [or 200 meters]/ potential impact
radius in feet [or meters]) 2]).
Identified site means each of the following areas:
(a) An outside area or open structure that is occupied by twenty (20) or more persons on at
least 50 days in any twelve (12)-month period. (The days need not be consecutive). Examples
include but are not limited to, beaches, playgrounds, recreational facilities, camping grounds,
outdoor theaters, stadiums, recreational areas near a body of water, or areas outside a rural building
such as a religious facility); or
(b) A building that is occupied by twenty (20) or more persons on at least five (5) days a
week for ten (10) weeks in any twelve (12)-month period. (The days and weeks need not be
consecutive). Examples include, but are not limited to, religious facilities, office buildings,
community centers, general stores, 4-H facilities, or roller skating rinks); or
(c) A facility occupied by persons who are confined, are of impaired mobility, or would be
difficult to evacuate. Examples include but are not limited to hospitals, prisons, schools, day-care
facilities, retirement facilities or assisted-living facilities.
Potential impact circle is a circle of radius equal to the potential impact radius (PIR).
Potential impact radius (PIR) means the radius of a circle within which the potential failure of a
pipeline could have significant impact on people or property. PIR is determined by the formula r =
0.69 * (square root of (p*d2)), where ‘r’ is the radius of a circular area in feet surrounding the point of
failure, ‘p’ is the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) in the pipeline segment in pounds
per square inch and ‘d’ is the nominal diameter of the pipeline in inches.
Note: 0.69 is the factor for natural gas. This number will vary for other gases depending upon
their heat of combustion. An operator transporting gas other than natural gas must use section 3.2
of ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2001 (Supplement to ASME B31.8; incorporated by reference, see §192.7) to
calculate the impact radius formula.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004, Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004 and
Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Glossary of Commonly Used Terms and Abbreviations Used in Subpart O
Note: For other terms and abbreviations, see Glossary of Commonly Used Terms and Glossary of
Commonly Used Abbreviations of the guide material under §192.3.
§192.905
How does an operator identify a high consequence area?
[Effective Date: 2-14-04]
(a) General. To determine which segments of an operator’s transmission pipeline system are
covered by this subpart, an operator must identify the high consequence areas. An operator must
use method (1) or (2) from the definition in §192.903 to identify a high consequence area. An
operator
may apply one method to its entire pipeline system, or an operator may apply one method to
individual portions of the pipeline system. An operator must describe in its integrity management
program which method it is applying to each portion of the operator’s pipeline system. The
description must include the potential impact radius when utilized to establish a high consequence
area. (See Appendix E.I. for guidance on identifying high consequence areas.)
(b) (1) Identified sites. An operator must identify an identified site, for purposes of this subpart,
from information the operator has obtained from routine operation and maintenance activities and
from public officials with safety or emergency response or planning responsibilities who indicate to
the operator that they know of locations that meet the identified site criteria. These public officials
could include officials on a local emergency planning commission or relevant Native American tribal
officials.
(2) If a public official with safety or emergency response or planning responsibilities
informs an operator that it does not have the information to identify an identified site, the operator
must use one of the following sources, as appropriate, to identify these sites.
(i) Visible marking (e.g., a sign); or
(ii) The site is licensed or registered by a Federal, State, or local government agency;
or
(iii) The site is on a list (including a list on an internet web site) or map maintained by
or available from a Federal, State, or local government agency and available to the general public.
(c) Newly-identified areas. When an operator has information that the area around a pipeline
segment not previously identified as a high consequence area could satisfy any of the definitions in
§192.903, the operator must complete the evaluation using method (1) or (2). If the segment is
determined to meet the definition as a high consequence area, it must be incorporated into the
operator’s baseline assessment plan as a high consequence area within one year from the date the
area is identified.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.907
What must an operator do to implement this subpart?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General. No later than December 17, 2004, an operator of a covered pipeline segment must
develop and follow a written integrity management program that contains all the elements described
in §192.911 and that addresses the risks on each covered transmission pipeline segment. The initial
integrity management program must consist, at a minimum, of a framework that describes the
process for implementing each program element, how relevant decisions will be made and by
whom, a time line for completing the work to implement the program element, and how information
gained from experience will be continuously incorporated into the program. The framework will
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
evolve into a more detailed and comprehensive program. An operator must make continual
improvements to the program.
(b) Implementation Standards. In carrying out this subpart, an operator must follow the
requirements of this subpart and of ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see §192.7) and
its appendices, where specified. An operator may follow an equivalent standard or practice only
when the operator demonstrates the alternative standard or practice provides an equivalent level of
safety to the public and property. In the event of a conflict between this subpart and ASME/ANSI
B31.8S, the requirements in this subpart control.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 WRITTEN PROGRAM
1.1 General.
A written program provides a road map for assessment, integration and analysis of data, and
courses of action available in managing pipeline integrity. The program can incorporate or reference
existing policies and procedures that may address the elements listed in §192.911. The operator
should consider conducting a gap analysis between current policies and procedures and the
requirements of Subpart O to determine if additional plans, processes, or procedures may be
required.
1.2 Development.
The operator should consider the following when developing its Integrity Management Program
(IMP).
(a) Existing operations and maintenance procedures.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(b) Existing management systems (e.g., quality assurance and management of change).
(c) Existing environmental and safety programs.
(d) The “FAQs” from the OPS website at http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/gasimp/faqlist.gim.
(e) The “Inspection Protocols” from the OPS website at
http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/gasimp/prolist.gim.
(f) The process “Flowcharts” from the OPS website at http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/gasimp/.
1.3 References.
(a) “Pipeline Risk Management Manual,” W. Kent Muhlbauer, Gulf Professional Publishing,
ISBN: 0-7506-7579-9.
(b) GPTC-Z380-TR-1, “Review of Integrity Management for Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines,” an
ANSI Technical Report by GPTC (AGA Catalog Number X69806).
Operators that have determined that there are no HCAs should document how that determination
was made. The operator must develop a written process for identifying new HCAs. See guide
material under §192.905. If HCAs are subsequently discovered, the operator is required to develop
an IMP.
3 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
3.1 General.
Subpart O requires use of the following documents, which are incorporated by reference in §192.7.
(a) ASME B31.8S, “Supplement to B31.8 on Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines.”
(b) NACE RP0502, “Pipeline External Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology.”
An operator must meet the requirements of Subpart O and the referenced sections of these
documents. In the event of a conflict between ASME B31.8S and NACE RP0502, the more stringent
requirement should be followed.
TABLE 192.907i
§192.909
How can an operator change its integrity management program?
[Effective Date: 4-6-04]
(a) General. An operator must document any change to its program and the reasons for the
change before implementing the change.
(b) Notification. An operator must notify OPS, in accordance with §192.949, of any change to
the program that may substantially affect the program’s implementation or may significantly modify
the program or schedule for carrying out the program elements. An operator must also notify a State
or local pipeline safety authority when either a covered segment is located in a State where OPS has
an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate covered segment is regulated by that State. An
operator must provide the notification within 30 days after adopting this type of change into its
program.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 CHANGES TO BE DOCUMENTED
It is anticipated that there will be a number of changes over time to an operator’s Integrity Management
Program (IMP). Documentation of changes and the reasons for them should include decisions,
analyses, and processes used to change elements of the IMP. The operator should maintain previous
versions of the IMP for the life of the pipeline. See guide material under §192.947. This documentation
can be in electronic format. Factors that might cause a change to the IMP include the following.
(a) Information obtained from the integrity assessments.
(b) Operating experience.
(c) The operator’s understanding about the specific integrity threats and the relative importance of
those threats may change.
(d) The operator’s understanding about a specific integrity assessment tool changes, and the operator
chooses to use another type.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(e) Risks are different than previously understood and an operator needs to reprioritize assessments.
(f) Identification of a new HCA, which adjusts the baseline assessment plan.
(g) Development of additional program elements.
2 NOTIFICATION
When applicable, notification of program changes is required to OPS (and typically providing an
informational copy to the state). Where OPS has an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate
covered segment is regulated by that state, the operator must also notify the state pipeline safety
authority. A reference for state contacts is available at http://www.napsr.org.
(d) Circumstances that would keep an operator from achieving the 2007 or 2012 assessment
deadlines (e.g., weather or permit delays).
Notification should include the changes to the program and reasons for such changes. See guide
material under §192.949.
§192.911
What are the elements of an integrity management program?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
An operator’s initial integrity management program begins with a framework (see § 192.907) and
evolves into a more detailed and comprehensive integrity management program, as information is
gained and incorporated into the program. An operator must make continual improvements to its
program. The initial program framework and subsequent program must, at minimum, contain the
following elements. (When indicated, refer to ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7) for more detailed information on the listed element.)
(a) An identification of all high consequence areas, in accordance with §192.905.
(b) A baseline assessment plan meeting the requirements of §192.919 and §192.921.
(c) An identification of threats to each covered pipeline segment, which must include data
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
integration and a risk assessment. An operator must use the threat identification and risk
assessment to prioritize covered segments for assessment (§192.917) and to evaluate the merits of
additional preventive and mitigative measures (§192.935) for each covered segment.
(d) A direct assessment plan, if applicable, meeting the requirements of §192.923, and
depending on the threat assessed, of §§192.925, 192.927, or 192.929.
(e) Provisions meeting the requirements of §192.933 for remediating conditions found during
an integrity assessment.
(f) A process for continual evaluation and assessment meeting the requirements of §192.937.
(g) If applicable, a plan for confirmatory direct assessment meeting the requirements of
§192.931.
(h) Provisions meeting the requirements of §192.935 for adding preventive and mitigative
measures to protect the high consequence area.
(i) A performance plan as outlined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 9 that includes performance
measures meeting the requirements of §192.945.
(j) Record keeping provisions meeting the requirements of §192.947.
(k) A management of change process as outlined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 11.
(l) A quality assurance process as outlined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 12.
(m) A communication plan that includes the elements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 10, and
that includes procedures for addressing safety concerns raised by —
(1) OPS; and
(2) A State or local pipeline safety authority when a covered segment is located in a State
where OPS has an interstate agent agreement.
(n) Procedures for providing (when requested), by electronic or other means, a copy of the
operator’s risk analysis or integrity management program to —
(1) OPS; and
(2) A State or local pipeline safety authority when a covered segment is located in a State
where OPS has an interstate agent agreement.
(o) Procedures for ensuring that each integrity assessment is being conducted in a manner that
minimizes environmental and safety risks.
(p) A process for identification and assessment of newly-identified high consequence areas.
(See §§192.905 and 192.921.)
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.913
When may an operator deviate its program from
certain requirements of this subpart?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General. ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see §192.7) provides the essential
features of a performance-based or a prescriptive integrity management program. An operator that
uses a performance-based approach that satisfies the requirements for exceptional performance in
paragraph (b) of this section may deviate from certain requirements in this subpart, as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Exceptional performance. An operator must be able to demonstrate the exceptional
performance of its integrity management program through the following actions.
(1) To deviate from any of the requirements set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, an
operator must have a performance-based integrity management program that meets or exceed the
performance-based requirements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S and includes, at a minimum, the following
elements —
(i) A comprehensive process for risk analysis;
(ii) All risk factor data used to support the program;
(iii) A comprehensive data integration process;
(iv) A procedure for applying lessons learned from assessment of covered pipeline
segments to pipeline segments not covered by this subpart;
(v) A procedure for evaluating every incident, including its cause, within the
operator’s sector of the pipeline industry for implications both to the operator’s pipeline system and
to the operator’s integrity management program;
(vi) A performance matrix that demonstrates the program has been effective in
ensuring the integrity of the covered segments by controlling the identified threats to the covered
segments;
(vii) Semi-annual performance measures beyond those required in §192.945 that are
part of the operator’s performance plan. (See §192.911(i).) An operator must submit these measures,
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
by electronic or other means, on a semi-annual frequency to OPS in accordance with §192.951; and
(viii) An analysis that supports the desired integrity reassessment interval and the
remediation methods to be used for all covered segments.
(2) In addition to the requirements for the performance-based plan, an operator must —
(i) Have completed at least two integrity assessments on each covered pipeline
segment the operator is including under the performance-based approach, and be able to
demonstrate that each assessment effectively addressed the identified threats on the covered
segment.
(ii) Remediate all anomalies identified in the more recent assessment according to the
requirements in §192.933, and incorporate the results and lessons learned from the more recent
assessment into the operator’s data integration and risk assessment.
(c) Deviation. Once an operator has demonstrated that it has satisfied the requirements of
paragraph (b) of this section, the operator may deviate from the prescriptive requirements of
ASME/ANSI B31.8S and of this subpart only in the following instances.
(1) The time frame for reassessment as provided in §192.939 except that reassessment by
some method allowed under this subpart (e.g., confirmatory direct assessment) must be carried out
at intervals no longer than seven years;
(2) The time frame for remediation as provided in §192.933 if the operator demonstrates the
time frame will not jeopardize the safety of the covered segment.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.915
What knowledge and training must personnel have to carry out
an integrity management program?
[Effective Date: 2-14-04]
(a) Supervisory personnel. The integrity management program must provide that each
supervisor whose responsibilities relate to the integrity management program possesses and
maintains a thorough knowledge of the integrity management program and of the elements for
which the supervisor is responsible. The program must provide that any person who qualifies as a
supervisor for the integrity management program has appropriate training or experience in the area
for which the person is responsible.
(b) Persons who carry out assessments and evaluate assessment results. The integrity
management program must provide criteria for the qualification of any person —
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(1) Who conducts an integrity assessment allowed under this subpart; or
(2) Who reviews and analyzes the results from an integrity assessment and evaluation; or
(3) Who makes decisions on actions to be taken based on these assessments.
(c) Persons responsible for preventive and mitigative measures. The integrity management
program must provide criteria for the qualification of any person —
(1) Who implements preventive and mitigative measures to carry out this subpart, including
the marking and locating of buried structures; or
(2) Who directly supervises excavation work carried out in conjunction with an integrity
assessment.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1.1 General.
The integrity management program (IMP) should define the training, qualification, or experience
required for supervisory personnel whose responsibilities relate to the IMP. Supervisory personnel
can acquire thorough knowledge of the IMP by achieving the following.
(a) General understanding of, and familiarity with, the overall program; and
(b) Specific knowledge in their respective areas of responsibility.
2 OTHER QUALIFICATIONS
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
the following.
(a) Perform assessments.
(b) Evaluate assessment results.
(c) Make technical decisions based upon assessment results (e.g., dig locations, repair methods,
prioritization of fieldwork).
(d) Implement preventive and mitigative measures.
(e) Supervise excavation work associated with assessments.
3 DOCUMENTATION
The operator might consider developing a matrix of integrity management related tasks, which
outline the qualification requirements, and what operator or contractor position may perform each
task.
(a) Documentation of the knowledge and training of integrity management personnel should
demonstrate the following.
(1) Competence in performing the assigned IMP element.
(2) Awareness of the IMP requirements.
(3) The process used to qualify the person for the IMP element.
(b) Operators using contractors in the IMP should document that the contractor employees are
aware of and qualified for the applicable sections of the operator’s IMP.
4 REFERENCE
Qualification guidance is provided by ASNT ILI-PQ, “In-line Inspection Personnel Qualification and
Certification.”
§192.917
How does an operator identify potential threats to pipeline integrity and
use the threat identification in its integrity program?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Threat identification. An operator must identify and evaluate all potential threats to each
covered pipeline segment. Potential threats that an operator must consider include, but are not
limited to, the threats listed in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 2,
which are grouped under the following four categories:
(1) Time dependent threats such as internal corrosion, external corrosion, and stress
corrosion cracking;
(2) Static or resident threats, such as fabrication or construction defects;
(3) Time independent threats such as third party damage and outside force damage; and
(4) Human error.
(b) Data gathering and integration. To identify and evaluate the potential threats to a covered
pipeline segment, an operator must gather and integrate existing data and information on the entire
pipeline that could be relevant to the covered segment. In performing this data gathering and
integration, an operator must follow the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 4. At a
minimum, an operator must gather and evaluate the set of data specified in Appendix A to
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, and consider both on the covered segment and similar non-covered segments,
past incident history, corrosion control records, continuing surveillance records, patrolling records,
maintenance history, internal inspection records and all other conditions specific to each pipeline.
(c) Risk assessment. An operator must conduct a risk assessment that follows ASME/ANSI
B31.8S, section 5, and considers the identified threats for each covered segment. An operator must
use the risk assessment to prioritize the covered segments for the baseline and continual
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
reassessments (§§192.919, 192.921, 192.937), and to determine what additional preventive and
mitigative measures are needed (§192.935) for the covered segment.
(d) Plastic Transmission Pipeline. An operator of a plastic transmission pipeline must assess
the threats to each covered segment using the information in sections 4 and 5 of ASME B31.8S, and
consider any threats unique to the integrity of plastic pipe.
(e) Actions to address particular threats. If an operator identifies any of the following threats,
the operator must take the following actions to address the threat.
(1) Third party damage. An operator must utilize the data integration required in paragraph
(b) of this section and ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A7 to determine the susceptibility of each
covered segment to the threat of third party damage. If an operator identifies the threat of third party
damage, the operator must implement comprehensive additional preventive measures in
accordance with §192.935 and monitor the effectiveness of the preventive measures. If, in
conducting a baseline assessment under § 192.921, or a reassessment under §192.937, an operator
uses an internal inspection tool or external corrosion direct assessment, the operator must integrate
data from these assessments with data related to any encroachment or foreign line crossing on the
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
covered segment, to define where potential indications of third party damage may exist in the
covered segment. An operator must also have procedures in its integrity management program
addressing actions it will take to respond to findings from this data integration.
(2) Cyclic fatigue. How does an operator identify potential threats to pipeline integrity and
use the threat identification in its integrity program? An operator must evaluate whether cyclic
fatigue or other loading condition (including ground movement, suspension bridge condition) could
lead to a failure of a deformation, including a dent or gouge, or other defect in the covered segment.
An evaluation must assume the presence of threats in the covered segment that could be
exacerbated by cyclic fatigue. An operator must use the results from the evaluation together with
the criteria used to evaluate the significance of this threat to the covered segment to prioritize the
integrity baseline assessment or reassessment.
(3) Manufacturing and construction defects. If an operator identifies the threat of
manufacturing and construction defects (including seam defects) in the covered segment, an
operator must analyze the covered segment to determine the risk of failure from these defects. The
analysis must consider the results of prior assessments on the covered segment. An operator may
consider manufacturing and construction related defects to be stable defects if the operating
pressure on the covered segment has not increased over the maximum operating pressure
experienced during the five years preceding identification of the high consequence area. If any of
the following changes occur in the covered segment, an operator must prioritize the covered
segment as a high risk segment for the baseline assessment or a subsequent reassessment.
(i) Operating pressure increases above the maximum operating pressure experienced
during the preceding five years;
(ii) MAOP increases; or
(iii) The stresses leading to cyclic fatigue increase.
(4) ERW pipe. If a covered pipeline segment contains low frequency electric resistance
welded pipe (ERW), lap welded pipe or other pipe that satisfies the conditions specified in
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendices A4.3 and A4.4, and any covered or noncovered segment in the
pipeline system with such pipe has experienced seam failure, or operating pressure on the covered
segment has increased over the maximum operating pressure experienced during the preceding five
years, an operator must select an assessment technology or technologies with a proven application
capable of assessing seam integrity and seam corrosion anomalies. The operator must prioritize the
covered segment as a high risk segment for the baseline assessment or a subsequent
reassessment.
(5) Corrosion. If an operator identifies corrosion on a covered pipeline segment that could
adversely affect the integrity of the line (conditions specified in §192.935), the operator must
evaluate and remediate, as necessary, all pipeline segments (both covered and non-covered) with
similar material coating and environmental characteristics. An operator must establish a schedule
for evaluating and remediating, as necessary, the similar segments that is consistent with the
operator’s established operating and maintenance procedures under Part 192 for testing and repair.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.919
What must be in the baseline assessment plan?
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Effective Date: 2-14-04]
An operator must include each of the following elements in its written baseline assessment
plan:
(a) Identification of the potential threats to each covered pipeline segment and the information
supporting the threat identification. (See §192.917.);
(b) The methods selected to assess the integrity of the line pipe, including an explanation of
why the assessment method was selected to address the identified threats to each covered
segment. The integrity assessment method an operator uses must be based on the threats identified
to the covered segment. (See §192.917.) More than one method may be required to address all the
threats to the covered pipeline segment;
(c) A schedule for completing the integrity assessment of all covered segments, including, risk
factors considered in establishing the assessment schedule;
(d) If applicable, a direct assessment plan that meets the requirements of §§192.923, and
depending on the threat to be addressed, of §192.925, §192.927, or §192.929; and
(e) A procedure to ensure that the baseline assessment is being conducted in a manner that
minimizes environmental and safety risks.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.921
How is the baseline assessment to be conducted?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Assessment methods. An operator must assess the integrity of the line pipe in each
covered segment by applying one or more of the following methods depending on the threats to
which the covered segment is susceptible. An operator must select the method or methods best
suited to address the threats identified to the covered segment (See §192.917).
(1) Internal inspection tool or tools capable of detecting corrosion, and any other threats to
which the covered segment is susceptible. An operator must follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 6.2 in selecting the appropriate internal inspection
tools for the covered segment.
(2) Pressure test conducted in accordance with subpart J of this part. An operator must use
the test pressures specified in Table 3 of section 5 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, to justify an extended
reassessment interval in accordance with §192.939.
(3) Direct assessment to address threats of external corrosion, internal corrosion, and
stress corrosion cracking. An operator must conduct the direct assessment in accordance with the
requirements listed in §192.923 and with, as applicable, the requirements specified in §§192.925,
192.927 or 192.929;
(4) Other technology that an operator demonstrates can provide an equivalent
understanding of the condition of the line pipe. An operator choosing this option must notify the
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180 days before conducting the assessment, in accordance with
§192.949. An operator must also notify a State or local pipeline safety authority when either a
covered segment is located in a State where OPS has an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate
covered segment is regulated by that State.
(b) Prioritizing segments. An operator must prioritize the covered pipeline segments for the
baseline assessment according to a risk analysis that considers the potential threats to each
covered segment. The risk analysis must comply with the requirements in §192.917.
(c) Assessment for particular threats. In choosing an assessment method for the baseline
assessment of each covered segment, an operator must take the actions required in §192.917(e) to
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.923
How is direct assessment used and for what threats?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General. An operator may use direct assessment either as a primary assessment method or
as a supplement to the other assessment methods allowed under this subpart. An operator may
only use direct assessment as the primary assessment method to address the identified threats of
external corrosion (ECDA), internal corrosion (ICDA), and stress corrosion cracking (SCCDA).
(b) Primary Method. An operator using direct assessment as a primary assessment method
must have a plan that complies with the requirements in —
(1) ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 6.4; NACE RP0502-
2002 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7); and §192.925 if addressing external corrosion (ECDA).
(2) ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 6.4 and Appendix B2, and §192.927 if addressing internal
corrosion (ICDA).
(3) ASME/ANSI B31.8S Appendix A3, and §192.929 if addressing stress corrosion cracking
(SCCDA).
(c) Supplemental method. An operator using direct assessment as a supplemental assessment
method for any applicable threat must have a plan that follows the requirements for confirmatory
direct assessment in §192.931.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL
(a) Direct Assessment (DA) is a structured process for assessing buried, onshore steel pipelines. This
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
process is comprised of multiple, interdependent steps, which include the following.
(1) Gathering and integration of data.
(2) Indirect examination.
(3) Direct examination.
(4) Post-assessment evaluation.
(b) See guide material under §§192.925, 192.927, and 192.929.
§192.925
What are the requirements for using
External Corrosion Direct Assessment (ECDA)?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Definition. ECDA is a four-step process that combines preassessment, indirect inspection,
direct examination, and post assessment to evaluate the threat of external corrosion to the integrity
of a pipeline.
(b) General requirements. An operator that uses direct assessment to assess the threat of
external corrosion must follow the requirements in this section, in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated
by reference, see §192.7), section 6.4, and in NACE RP0502–2002 (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7). An operator must develop and implement a direct assessment plan that has procedures
addressing preassessment, indirect examination, direct examination, and post-assessment. If the
ECDA detects pipeline coating damage, the operator must also integrate the data from the ECDA
with other information from the data integration (§192.917(b)) to evaluate the covered segment for
the threat of third party damage, and to address the threat as required by §192.917(e)(1).
(1) Preassessment. In addition to the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 and
NACE RP0502–2002, section 3, the plan’s procedures for preassessment must include —
(i) Provisions for applying more restrictive criteria when conducting ECDA for the
first time on a covered segment; and
(ii) The basis on which an operator selects at least two different, but complementary
indirect assessment tools to assess each ECDA Region. If an operator utilizes an indirect inspection
method that is not discussed in Appendix A of NACE RP0502–2002, the operator must demonstrate
the applicability, validation basis, equipment used, application procedure, and utilization of data for
the inspection method.
(2) Indirect examination. In addition to the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4
and NACE RP0502–2002, section 4, the plan’s procedures for indirect examination of the ECDA
regions must include —
(i) Provisions for applying more restrictive criteria when conducting ECDA for the
first time on a covered segment;
(ii) Criteria for identifying and documenting those indications that must be considered
for excavation and direct examination. Minimum identification criteria include the known
sensitivities of assessment tools, the procedures for using each tool, and the approach to be used
for decreasing the physical spacing of indirect assessment tool readings when the presence of a
defect is suspected;
(iii) Criteria for defining the urgency of excavation and direct examination of each
indication identified during the indirect examination. These criteria must specify how an operator
will define the urgency of excavating the indication as immediate, scheduled or monitored; and
(iv) Criteria for scheduling excavation of indications for each urgency level.
(3) Direct examination. In addition to the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4
and NACE RP0502–2002, section 5, the plan’s procedures for direct examination of indications from
the indirect examination must include —
(i) Provisions for applying more restrictive criteria when conducting ECDA for the
first time on a covered segment;
(ii) Criteria for deciding what action should be taken if either:
(A) Corrosion defects are discovered that exceed allowable limits (Section
5.5.2.2 of NACE RP0502–2002), or
(B) Root cause analysis reveals conditions for which ECDA is not suitable (Section
5.6.2 of NACE RP0502–2002);
(iii) Criteria and notification procedures for any changes in the ECDA Plan, including
changes that affect the severity classification, the priority of direct examination, and the time frame
for direct examination of indications; and
(iv) Criteria that describe how and on what basis an operator will reclassify and
reprioritize any of the provisions that are specified in section 5.9 of NACE RP0502–2002.
(4) Post assessment and continuing evaluation. In addition to the requirements in
ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 and NACE RP0502–2002, section 6, the plan’s procedures for post
assessment of the effectiveness of the ECDA process must include —
(i) Measures for evaluating the long-term effectiveness of ECDA in addressing
external corrosion in covered segments; and
(ii) Criteria for evaluating whether conditions discovered by direct examination of
indications in each ECDA region indicate a need for reassessment of the covered segment at an
interval less than that specified in §192.939. (See Appendix D of NACE RP0502–2002.)
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004, Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004 and
Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.927
What are the requirements for using
Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (ICDA)?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Definition. Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (ICDA) is a process an operator uses to
identify areas along the pipeline where fluid or other electrolyte introduced during normal operation
or by an upset condition may reside, and then focuses direct examination on the locations in
covered segments where internal corrosion is most likely to exist. The process identifies the
potential for internal corrosion caused by microorganisms, or fluid with CO2, O2, hydrogen sulfide
or other contaminants present in the gas.
(b) General requirements. An operator using direct assessment as an assessment method to
address internal corrosion in a covered pipeline segment must follow the requirements in this
section and in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 6.4 and appendix
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
B2. The ICDA process described in this section applies only for a segment of pipe transporting
nominally dry natural gas, and not for a segment with electrolyte nominally present in the gas
stream. If an operator uses ICDA to assess a covered segment operating with electrolyte present in
the gas stream, the operator must develop a plan that demonstrates how it will conduct ICDA in the
segment to effectively address internal corrosion, and must provide notification in accordance with
§192.921(a)(4) or §192.937(c)(4).
(c) The ICDA plan. An operator must develop and follow an ICDA plan that provides for
preassessment, identification of ICDA regions and excavation locations, detailed examination of
pipe at excavation locations, and post-assessment evaluation and monitoring.
(1) Preassessment. In the preassessment stage, an operator must gather and integrate data
and information needed to evaluate the feasibility of ICDA for the covered segment, and to support
use of a model to identify the locations along the pipe segment where electrolyte may accumulate, to
identify ICDA regions, and to identify areas within the covered segment where liquids may
potentially be entrained. This data and information includes, but is not limited to —
(i) All data elements listed in Appendix A2 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S;
(ii) Information needed to support use of a model that an operator must use to identify
areas along the pipeline where internal corrosion is most likely to occur. (See paragraph (a) of this
section.) This information, includes, but is not limited to, location of all gas input and withdrawal
points on the line; location of all low points on covered segments such as sags, drips, inclines,
valves, manifolds, dead-legs, and traps; the elevation profile of the pipeline in sufficient detail that
angles of inclination can be calculated for all pipe segments; and the diameter of the pipeline, and
the range of expected gas velocities in the pipeline;
(iii) Operating experience data that would indicate historic upsets in gas conditions,
locations where these upsets have occurred, and potential damage resulting from these upset
conditions; and
(iv) Information on covered segments where cleaning pigs may not have been used or
where cleaning pigs may deposit electrolytes.
(2) ICDA region identification. An operator’s plan must identify where all ICDA Regions are
located in the transmission system, in which covered segments are located. An ICDA Region
extends from the location where liquid may first enter the pipeline and encompasses the entire area
along the pipeline where internal corrosion may occur and where further evaluation is needed. An
ICDA Region may encompass one or more covered segments. In the identification process, an
operator must use the model in GRI 02-0057, “Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas
Transmission Pipelines - Methodology,” (incorporated by reference, see §192.7). An operator may
use another model if the operator demonstrates it is equivalent to the one shown in GRI 02-0057. A
model must consider changes in pipe diameter, locations where gas enters a line (potential to
introduce liquid) and locations down stream of gas drawoffs (where gas velocity is reduced) to
define the critical pipe angle of inclination above which water film cannot be transported by the gas.
(3) Identification of locations for excavation and direct examination. An operator’s plan
must identify the locations where internal corrosion is most likely in each ICDA region. In the
location identification process, an operator must identify a minimum of two locations for excavation
within each ICDA Region within a covered segment and must perform a direct examination for
internal corrosion at each location, using ultrasonic thickness measurements, radiography, or other
generally accepted measurement technique. One location must be the low point (e.g., sags, drips,
valves, manifolds, dead-legs, traps) within the covered segment nearest to the beginning of the
ICDA Region. The second location must be further downstream, within a covered segment, near the
end of the ICDA Region. If corrosion exists at either location, the operator must —
(i) Evaluate the severity of the defect (remaining strength) and remediate the defect in
accordance with §192.933;
(ii) As part of the operator’s current integrity assessment either perform additional
excavations in each covered segment within the ICDA region, or use an alternative assessment
method allowed by this subpart to assess the line pipe in each covered segment within the ICDA
region for internal corrosion; and
(iii) Evaluate the potential for internal corrosion in all pipeline segments (both covered
and non-covered) in the operator’s pipeline system with similar characteristics to the ICDA region
containing the covered segment in which the corrosion was found, and as appropriate, remediate
the conditions the operator finds in accordance with §192.933.
(4) Post-assessment evaluation and monitoring. An operator’s plan must provide for
evaluating the effectiveness of the ICDA process and continued monitoring of covered segments
where internal corrosion has been identified. The evaluation and monitoring process includes —
(i) Evaluating the effectiveness of ICDA as an assessment method for addressing
internal corrosion and determining whether a covered segment should be reassessed at more
frequent intervals than those specified in §192.939. An operator must carry out this evaluation within
a year of conducting an ICDA; and
(ii) Continually monitoring each covered segment where internal corrosion has been
identified using techniques such as coupons, UT sensors or electronic probes, periodically drawing
off liquids at low points and chemically analyzing the liquids for the presence of corrosion products.
An operator must base the frequency of the monitoring and liquid analysis on results from all
integrity assessments that have been conducted in accordance with the requirements of this
subpart, and risk factors specific to the covered segment. If an operator finds any evidence of
corrosion products in the covered segment, the operator must take prompt action in accordance
with one of the two following required actions and remediate the conditions the operator finds in
accordance with §192.933.
(A) Conduct excavations of covered segments at locations downstream from
where the electrolyte might have entered the pipe; or
(B) Assess the covered segment using another integrity assessment method
allowed by this subpart.
(5) Other requirements. The ICDA plan must also include —
(i) Criteria an operator will apply in making key decisions (e.g., ICDA feasibility,
definition of ICDA Regions, conditions requiring excavation) in implementing each stage of the ICDA
process;
(ii) Provisions for applying more restrictive criteria when conducting ICDA for the first
time on a covered segment and that become less stringent as the operator gains experience; and
(iii) Provisions that analysis be carried out on the entire pipeline in which covered
segments are present, except that application of the remediation criteria of §192.933 may be limited
to covered segments.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan.
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.929
What are the requirements for using Direct Assessment for
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCCDA)?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) Definition. Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct Assessment (SCCDA) is a process to assess a
covered pipe segment for the presence of SCC primarily by systematically gathering and analyzing
excavation data for pipe having similar operational characteristics and residing in a similar physical
environment.
(b) General requirements. An operator using direct assessment as an integrity assessment
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
method to address stress corrosion cracking in a covered pipeline segment must have a plan that
provides, at minimum, for —
(1) Data gathering and integration. An operator’s plan must provide for a systematic
process to collect and evaluate data for all covered segments to identify whether the conditions for
SCC are present and to prioritize the covered segments for assessment. This process must include
gathering and evaluating data related to SCC at all sites an operator excavates during the conduct of
its pipeline operations where the criteria in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7), Appendix A3.3 indicate the potential for SCC. This data includes at minimum, the data
specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A3.
(2) Assessment method. The plan must provide that if conditions for SCC are identified in a
covered segment, an operator must assess the covered segment using an integrity assessment
method specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A3, and remediate the threat in accordance with
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A3, section A3.4.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.931
How may Confirmatory Direct Assessment (CDA) be used?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
An operator using the confirmatory direct assessment (CDA) method as allowed in §192.937
must have a plan that meets the requirements of this section and of §§192.925 (ECDA) and §192.927
(ICDA).
(a) Threats. An operator may only use CDA on a covered segment to identify damage resulting
from external corrosion or internal corrosion.
(b) External corrosion plan. An operator’s CDA plan for identifying external corrosion must
comply with §192.925 with the following exceptions.
(1) The procedures for indirect examination may allow use of only one indirect examination
tool suitable for the application.
(2) The procedures for direct examination and remediation must provide that —
(i) All immediate action indications must be excavated for each ECDA region; and
(ii) At least one high risk indication that meets the criteria of scheduled action must
be excavated in each ECDA region.
(c) Internal corrosion plan. An operator’s CDA plan for identifying internal corrosion must
comply with §192.927 except that the plan’s procedures for identifying locations for excavation may
require excavation of only one high risk location in each ICDA region.
(d) Defects requiring near-term remediation. If an assessment carried out under paragraph (b)
or (c) of this section reveals any defect requiring remediation prior to the next scheduled
assessment, the operator must schedule the next assessment in accordance with NACE RP0502-
2002 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 6.2 and 6.3. If the defect requires immediate
remediation, then the operator must reduce pressure consistent with §192.933 until the operator has
completed reassessment using one of the assessment techniques allowed in §192.937.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.933
What actions must be taken to address integrity issues?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General requirements. An operator must take prompt action to address all anomalous
conditions that the operator discovers through the integrity assessment. In addressing all
conditions, an operator must evaluate all anomalous conditions and remediate those that could
reduce a pipeline’s integrity. An operator must be able to demonstrate that the remediation of the
condition will ensure that the condition is unlikely to pose a threat to the integrity of the pipeline
until the next reassessment of the covered segment. If an operator is unable to respond within the
time limits for certain conditions specified in this section, the operator must temporarily reduce the
operating pressure of the pipeline or take other action that ensures the safety of the covered
segment. If pressure is reduced, an operator must determine the temporary reduction in operating
pressure using ASME/ANSI B31G (incorporated by reference, see §192.7) or AGA Pipeline Research
Committee Project PR-3-805 ("RSTRENG"; incorporated by reference, see §192.7) or reduce the
operating pressure to a level not exceeding 80% of the level at the time the condition was
discovered. (See Appendix A to this part 192 for information on availability of incorporation by
reference information). A reduction in operating pressure cannot exceed 365 days without an
operator providing a technical justification that the continued pressure restriction will not jeopardize
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
the integrity of the pipeline.
(b) Discovery of condition. Discovery of a condition occurs when an operator has adequate
information about a condition to determine that the condition presents a potential threat to the
integrity of the pipeline. A condition that presents a potential threat includes, but is not limited to,
those conditions that require remediation or monitoring listed under paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3)
of this section. An operator must promptly, but no later than 180 days after conducting an integrity
assessment, obtain sufficient information about a condition to make that determination, unless the
operator demonstrates that the 180-day period is impracticable.
(c) Schedule for evaluation and remediation. An operator must complete remediation of a
condition according to a schedule that prioritizes the conditions for evaluation and remediation.
Unless a special requirement for remediating certain conditions applies, as provided in paragraph
(d) of this section, an operator must follow the schedule in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7), section 7, Figure 4. If an operator cannot meet the schedule for any condition,
the operator must justify the reasons why it cannot meet the schedule and that the changed
schedule will not jeopardize public safety. An operator must notify OPS in accordance with §
192.949 if it cannot meet the schedule and cannot provide safety through a temporary reduction in
operating pressure or other action. An operator must also notify a State or local pipeline safety
authority when either a covered segment is located in a State where OPS has an interstate agent
agreement, or an intrastate covered segment is regulated by that State.
(d) Special requirements for scheduling remediation.
(1) Immediate repair conditions. An operator’s evaluation and remediation schedule must
follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 7 in providing for immediate repair conditions. To maintain
safety, an operator must temporarily reduce operating pressure in accordance with paragraph (a) of
this section or shut down the pipeline until the operator completes the repair of these conditions. An
operator must treat the following conditions as immediate repair conditions:
(i) A calculation of the remaining strength of the pipe shows a predicted failure
pressure less than or equal to1.1 times the maximum allowable operating pressure at the location of
the anomaly. Suitable remaining strength calculation methods include, ASME/ANSI B31G;
RSTRENG; or an alternative equivalent method of remaining strength calculation. These documents
are incorporated by reference and available at the addresses listed in Appendix A to Part 192.
(ii) A dent that has any indication of metal loss, cracking or a stress riser.
(iii) An indication or anomaly that in the judgment of the person designated by the
operator to evaluate the assessment results requires immediate action.
(2) One-year conditions. Except for conditions listed in paragraph (d)(1) and (d)(3) of this
section, an operator must remediate any of the following within one year of discovery of the
condition:
(i) A smooth dent located between the 8 o’clock and 4 o’clock positions (upper 2/3 of
the pipe) with a depth greater than 6% of the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50 inches in depth for
a pipeline diameter less than Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 12).
(ii) A dent with a depth greater than 2% of the pipeline's diameter (0.250 inches in
depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS 12) that affects pipe curvature at a girth weld or at a
longitudinal seam weld.
(3) Monitored conditions. An operator does not have to schedule the following conditions
for remediation, but must record and monitor the conditions during subsequent risk assessments
and integrity assessments for any change that may require remediation:
(i) A dent with a depth greater than 6% of the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50
inches in depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS 12) located between the 4 o’clock position and
the 8 o’clock position (bottom 1/3 of the pipe).
(ii) A dent located between the 8 o’clock and 4 o’clock positions (upper 2/3 of the
pipe) with a depth greater than 6% of the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50 inches in depth for a
pipeline diameter less than Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) 12), and engineering analyses of the dent
demonstrate critical strain levels are not exceeded.
(iii) A dent with a depth greater than 2% of the pipeline’s diameter (0.250 inches in
depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS 12) that affects pipe curvature at a girth weld or a
longitudinal seam weld, and engineering analyses of the dent and girth or seam weld demonstrate
critical strain levels are not exceeded. These analyses must consider weld properties.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.935
What additional preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General requirements. An operator must take additional measures beyond those already
required by Part 192 to prevent a pipeline failure and to mitigate the consequences of a pipeline
failure in a high consequence area. An operator must base the additional measures on the threats
the operator has identified to each pipeline segment. (See §192.917.) An operator must conduct, in
accordance with one of the risk assessment approaches in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7), section 5, a risk analysis of its pipeline to identify additional measures to
protect the high consequence area and enhance public safety. Such additional measures include,
but are not limited to, installing Automatic Shut-off Valves or Remote Control Valves, installing
computerized monitoring and leak detection systems, replacing pipe segments with pipe of heavier
wall thickness, providing additional training to personnel on response procedures, conducting drills
with local emergency responders and implementing additional inspection and maintenance
programs.
(b) Third party damage and outside force damage.
(1) Third party damage. An operator must enhance its damage prevention program, as
required under §192.614 of this part, with respect to a covered segment to prevent and minimize the
consequences of a release due to third party damage. Enhanced measures to an existing damage
prevention program include, at a minimum —
(i) Using qualified personnel (see §192.915) for work an operator is conducting that
could adversely affect the integrity of a covered segment, such as marking, locating, and direct
supervision of known excavation work.
(ii) Collecting in a central database information that is location specific on excavation
damage that occurs in covered and non covered segments in the transmission system and the root
cause analysis to support identification of targeted additional preventative and mitigative measures
in the high consequence areas. This information must include recognized damage that is not
required to be reported as an incident under part 191.
(iii) Participating in one-call systems in locations where covered segments are
present.
(iv) Monitoring of excavations conducted on covered pipeline segments by pipeline
personnel. If an operator finds physical evidence of encroachment involving excavation that the
operator did not monitor near a covered segment, an operator must either excavate the area near the
encroachment or conduct an above ground survey using methods defined in NACE RP0502–2002
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7). An operator must excavate, and remediate, in accordance
with ANSI/ASME B31.8S and §192.933 any indication of coating holidays or discontinuity warranting
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
direct examination.
(2) Outside force damage. If an operator determines that outside force (e.g., earth
movement, floods, unstable suspension bridge) is a threat to the integrity of a covered segment, the
operator must take measures to minimize the consequences to the covered segment from outside
force damage. These measures include, but are not limited to, increasing the frequency of aerial,
foot or other methods of patrols, adding external protection, reducing external stress, and relocating
the line.
(c) Automatic shut-off valves (ASV) or Remote control valves (RCV). If an operator determines,
based on a risk analysis, that an ASV or RCV would be an efficient means of adding protection to a
high consequence area in the event of a gas release, an operator must install the ASV or RCV. In
making that determination, an operator must, at least, consider the following factors — swiftness of
leak detection and pipe shutdown capabilities, the type of gas being transported, operating
pressure, the rate of potential release, pipeline profile, the potential for ignition, and location of
nearest response personnel.
(d) Pipelines operating below 30% SMYS. An operator of a transmission pipeline operating
below 30% SMYS located in a high consequence area must follow the requirements in paragraphs
(d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section. An operator of a transmission pipeline operating below 30% SMYS
located in a Class 3 or Class 4 area but not in a high consequence area must follow the
requirements in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section.
(1) Apply the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(iii) of this section to the
pipeline; and
(2) Either monitor excavations near the pipeline, or conduct patrols as required by §192.705
of the pipeline at bi-monthly intervals. If an operator finds any indication of unreported construction
activity, the operator must conduct a follow up investigation to determine if mechanical damage has
occurred.
(3) Perform semi-annual leak surveys (quarterly for unprotected pipelines or cathodically
protected pipe where electrical surveys are impractical).
(e) Plastic transmission pipeline. An operator of a plastic transmission pipeline must apply the
requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(iv) of this section to the covered segments
of the pipeline.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004, Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004 and
Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004; Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
To comply with §192.935, an operator must conduct a risk analysis of all pipelines within HCAs, and
determine for each applicable threat on each covered segment whether any of the following (which
exceed the requirements of other subparts of Part 192) will prevent pipeline failure or mitigate the
consequences of such a failure.
(a) Installation of an automatic shut-off valve (ASV) or a remote control valve (RCV).
(1) To comply with §192.935(c), an operator must consider the following factors in determining if
an ASV or RCV would be an efficient means of adding protection in an HCA.
(i) Swiftness of leak detection. Example: There may be no advantage to installing an ASV or
RCV on segments where adequate SCADA or other monitoring methods allow for quick
operator response to leakage.
(ii) Shutdown capabilities in the area. Example: An ASV or RCV might not make shutdown
any faster or easier in locations where adequate valving and easy access already exists.
(iii) Type of gas. Example: An ASV or RCV might mitigate the environmental impact of
leakage on a pipeline carrying heavier-than-air gases.
(iv) Operating pressure. Example: Higher-pressure lines hold a larger volume of gas. An ASV
or RCV on such a line may reduce the volume of release and potential for ignition.
(v) Potential release rate. Example: Installing an ASV or RCV may affect the duration of the
potential release rate.
(vi) Pipeline profile. Example: Heavier-than-air gases can pool in low elevation spots. An ASV
or RCV in such locations may allow faster shut off and, therefore, less accumulation of
gas.
(vii) Potential for ignition. Example: Areas that have known sources of ignition (e.g., foundries)
might benefit from an ASV or RCV.
(viii) Location of nearest response personnel. Example: Locations where operator response is
timely may not benefit from the installation of an ASV or RCV.
(2) An operator may also consider the following.
(i) Seasonal weather restrictions that can impede access.
(ii) Depth of pipe as it relates to access for squeeze-off.
(iii) River crossings or other geographical features that affect access for maintenance or
response.
(iv) Proximity of the HCA to existing valves.
(v) Population density.
(vi) Wide pressure fluctuations due to normal operating conditions (e.g., power plant
locations).
(vii) Maintenance, reliability, and cost-benefit issues.
(b) Installation of computerized monitoring and leak detection systems.
An operator may consider the following, which could provide earlier leak or pipeline rupture
detection.
(1) Increasing the locations monitored by SCADA.
(2) Automating data gathering from other monitoring devices such as pressure transmitters.
(c) Replacing pipe with that of heavier wall thickness, which is more resistant to damage from external
forces.
(d) Providing additional training on response procedures.
An operator may consider the following.
(1) Increasing the frequency of emergency response training.
(2) Conducting tabletop or field drills.
(3) Hiring a third party with expertise in emergency response to conduct training.
(4) Attending emergency response training offered by industry associations.
(e) Conducting drills with local emergency responders.
The operator may consider the following.
(1) Including the drill as part of liaison meetings with emergency responders.
(2) Working with local multi-agency, emergency coordination groups.
(3) Incorporating the drill into local fire or police academy curriculum.
(f) Implementing additional inspection and maintenance programs.
The operator may consider the following.
(1) Increasing leak survey frequencies.
(2) Increasing patrol frequencies.
(3) Using procedures with more stringent criteria than required by the Regulations.
(4) Increasing facility inspection frequencies.
To comply with §192.935(b)(1) for the specific threat of third party damage, an operator must do the
following.
(a) Qualify personnel to conduct the following activities related to work the operator is conducting in a
covered segment.
(1) Locating the pipeline.
(2) Marking the pipeline.
(3) Directly supervising known excavation work. A qualification for this activity might include the
following.
(i) Recognition of line-locate markings.
(ii) Knowledge of One-Call requirements.
(iii) Knowledge of operator’s applicable procedures, including emergency response.
(iv) Understanding the risks of various excavation methods.
(4) Other activities that could adversely affect the integrity of the pipeline.
(b) Use a central database to collect the following.
(1) Excavation damage information for covered and non-covered segments. This might include the
following.
(i) Number of leaks or ruptures.
(ii) Number of known damages not resulting in leaks or ruptures.
(iii) Excavation method.
(iv) Name of excavator causing damage.
(2) Root cause analysis data to identify targeted P&M measures for HCAs. This might include the
number of damages where:
(i) No line locate was requested.
(ii) Line was incorrectly marked.
(iii) Line was not marked.
(iv) Construction procedures were not followed correctly (e.g., exposing lines during boring).
(3) Damage data that is not DOT reportable (reference Part 191 requirements). This might include
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
To comply with §192.935(b)(2) for the specific threat of outside force damage (e.g., earth movement,
floods, unstable suspension bridge), an operator must take additional measures to minimize the
consequences of outside force.
(a) The measures include the following.
(1) Increasing the frequency of patrols. This may allow faster recognition of damage.
(2) Adding external protection. This might include the following.
(i) Installing fencing or other barriers to impede earth movement.
(ii) External slabs or additional cover.
(3) Reducing external stress. This might include the following.
(i) Installing expansion joints.
(ii) Removing overburden.
(4) Relocating the pipeline to an area with less exposure to outside forces. This might include
lowering or raising the pipeline.
(b) An operator may also consider installing the following.
(1) River anchors where appropriate.
(2) Elevated relief or vent stacks on regulator stations.
(3) Additional bridge hangers or pipe supports.
(4) New structures requiring excavation (e.g., fence posts, telephone poles, buildings, slabs).
(5) Exposed pipe.
(6) New landscaping.
(7) One-call documentation.
(e) See Table 192.935i.
Class 1 & 2
outside HCA
Class 3 & 4 X X X X
in HCA
Class 3 & 4 X X X X
outside HCA
TABLE 192.935i
§192.937
What is a continual process of evaluation and assessment to
maintain a pipeline’s integrity?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General. After completing the baseline integrity assessment of a covered segment, an
operator must continue to assess the line pipe of that segment at the intervals specified in §192.939
and periodically evaluate the integrity of each covered pipeline segment as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section. An operator must reassess a covered segment on which a prior assessment is
credited as a baseline under §192.921(e) by no later than December 17, 2009. An operator must
reassess a covered segment on which a baseline assessment is conducted during the baseline
period specified in §192.921(d) by no later than seven years after the baseline assessment of that
covered segment unless the evaluation under paragraph (b) of this section indicates earlier
reassessment.
(b) Evaluation. An operator must conduct a periodic evaluation as frequently as needed to
assure the integrity of each covered segment. The periodic evaluation must be based on a data
integration and risk assessment of the entire pipeline as specified in §192.917. For plastic
transmission pipelines, the periodic evaluation is based on the threat analysis specified in
192.917(d). For all other transmission pipelines, the evaluation must consider the past and present
integrity assessment results, data integration and risk assessment information (§192.917), and
decisions about remediation (§192.933) and additional preventive and mitigative actions (§192.935).
An operator must use the results from this evaluation to identify the threats specific to each covered
segment and the risk represented by these threats.
(c) Assessment methods. In conducting the integrity reassessment, an operator must assess
the integrity of the line pipe in the covered segment by any of the following methods as appropriate
for the threats to which the covered segment is susceptible (see §192.917), or by confirmatory direct
assessment under the conditions specified in §192.931.
(1) Internal inspection tool or tools capable of detecting corrosion, and any other threats to
which the covered segment is susceptible. An operator must follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 6.2 in selecting the appropriate internal inspection
tools for the covered segment.
(2) Pressure test conducted in accordance with subpart J of this part. An operator must use
the test pressures specified in Table 3 of section 5 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, to justify an extended
reassessment interval in accordance with §192.939.
(3) Direct assessment to address threats of external corrosion, internal corrosion, or stress
corrosion cracking. An operator must conduct the direct assessment in accordance with the
requirements listed in §192.923 and with as applicable, the requirements specified in §§192.925,
192.927 or 192.929;
(4) Other technology that an operator demonstrates can provide an equivalent
understanding of the condition of the line pipe. An operator choosing this option must notify the
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180 days before conducting the assessment, in accordance with
§192.949. An operator must also notify a State or local pipeline safety authority when either a
covered segment is located in a State where OPS has an interstate agent agreement, or an intrastate
covered segment is regulated by that State.
(5) Confirmatory direct assessment when used on a covered segment that is scheduled for
reassessment at a period longer than seven years. An operator using this reassessment method
must comply with §192.931.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.939
What are the required reassessment intervals?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
An operator must comply with the following requirements in establishing the reassessment
interval for the operator’s covered pipeline segments.
(a) Pipelines operating at or above 30% SMYS. An operator must establish a reassessment
interval for each covered segment operating at or above 30% SMYS in accordance with the
requirements of this section. The maximum reassessment interval by an allowable reassessment
method is seven years. If an operator establishes a reassessment interval that is greater than seven
years, the operator must, within the seven-year period, conduct a confirmatory direct assessment on
the covered segment, and then conduct the follow-up reassessment at the interval the operator has
established. A reassessment carried out using confirmatory direct assessment must be done in
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Addendum No. 6, September 2006 262(am)
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND §192.939
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition SUBPART O
accordance with §192.931. The table that follows this section sets forth the maximum allowed
reassessment intervals.
(1) Pressure test or internal inspection or other equivalent technology. An operator that
uses pressure testing or internal inspection as an assessment method must establish the
reassessment interval for a covered pipeline segment by —
(i) Basing the interval on the identified threats for the covered segment (see §192.917)
and on the analysis of the results from the last integrity assessment and from the data integration
and risk assessment required by §192.917; or
(ii) Using the intervals specified for different stress levels of pipeline (operating at or
above 30% SMYS) listed in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5, Table 3.
(2) External Corrosion Direct Assessment. An operator that uses ECDA that meets the
requirements of this subpart must determine the reassessment interval according to the
requirements in paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 of NACE RP0502-2002 (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7).
(3) Internal Corrosion or SCC Direct Assessment. An operator that uses ICDA or SCCDA in
accordance with the requirements of this subpart must determine the reassessment interval
according to the following method. However, the reassessment interval cannot exceed those
specified for direct assessment in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5, Table 3.
(i) Determine the largest defect most likely to remain in the covered segment and the
corrosion rate appropriate for the pipe, soil and protection conditions;
(ii) Use the largest remaining defect as the size of the largest defect discovered in the
SCC or ICDA segment; and
(iii) Estimate the reassessment interval as half the time required for the largest defect
to grow to a critical size.
(b) Pipelines Operating Below 30% SMYS. An operator must establish a reassessment interval
for each covered segment operating below 30% SMYS in accordance with the requirements of this
section. The maximum reassessment interval by an allowable reassessment method is seven years.
An operator must establish reassessment by at least one of the following —
(1) Reassessment by pressure test, internal inspection or other equivalent technology
following the requirements in paragraph (a)(1) of this section except that the stress level referenced
in (a)(1)(ii) would be adjusted to reflect the lower operating stress level. If an established interval is
more than seven years, the operator must conduct by the seventh year of the interval either a
confirmatory direct assessment in accordance with §192.931, or a low stress reassessment in
accordance with §192.941.
(2) Reassessment by ECDA following the requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Reassessment by ICDA or SCCDA following the requirements in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section.
(4) Reassessment by confirmatory direct assessment at 7-year intervals in accordance with
§192.931, with reassessment by one of the methods listed in paragraphs (b)(1 ) through (b)(3) of this
section by year 20 of the interval.
(5) Reassessment by the low stress assessment method at 7-year intervals in accordance
with §192.941 with reassessment by one of the methods listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of
this section by year 20 of the interval. The following table sets forth the maximum reassessment
intervals. Also refer to Appendix E.II for guidance on Assessment Methods and Assessment
Schedule for Transmission Pipelines Operating Below 30% SMYS. In case of conflict between the
rule and the guidance in the Appendix, the requirements of the rule control. An operator must
comply with the following requirements in establishing a reassessment interval for a covered
segment:
(6) An operator must comply with the following requirements in establishing a
reassessment interval for a covered segment:
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Confirmatory 7 years 7 years 7 years
Direct Assessment
Low Stress Not Applicable Not Applicable 7 years + ongoing
Reassessment actions specified in
§192.941
(*) A Confirmatory direct assessment as described in §192.931 must be conducted by year 7 in
a 10-year interval and years 7 and 14 of a 15-year interval.
(**) A low stress reassessment or Confirmatory direct assessment must be conducted by years
7 and 14 of the interval.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004
Amdt. 192-103]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.941
What is a low stress reassessment?
[Effective Date: 4-6-04]
(a) General. An operator of a transmission line that operates below 30% SMYS may use the
following method to reassess a covered segment in accordance with §192.939. This method of
reassessment addresses the threats of external and internal corrosion. The operator must have
conducted a baseline assessment of the covered segment in accordance with the requirements of
§§192.919 and 192.921.
(b) External corrosion. An operator must take one of the following actions to address external
corrosion on the low stress covered segment.
(1) Cathodically protected pipe. To address the threat of external corrosion on cathodically
protected pipe in a covered segment, an operator must perform an electrical survey (i.e. indirect
examination tool/method) at least every 7 years on the covered segment. An operator must use the
results of each survey as part of an overall evaluation of the cathodic protection and corrosion
threat for the covered segment. This evaluation must consider, at minimum, the leak repair and
inspection records, corrosion monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection records, and the pipeline
environment.
(2) Unprotected pipe or cathodically protected pipe where electrical surveys are impractical.
If an electrical survey is impractical on the covered segment an operator must —
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
§192.943
When can an operator deviate from these reassessment intervals?
[Effective Date: 4-6-04]
(a) Waiver from reassessment interval in limited situations. In the following limited instances,
OPS may allow a waiver from a reassessment interval required by §192.939 if OPS finds a waiver
would not be inconsistent with pipeline safety.
(1) Lack of internal inspection tools. An operator who uses internal inspection as an
assessment method may be able to justify a longer reassessment period for a covered segment if
internal inspection tools are not available to assess the line pipe. To justify this, the operator must
demonstrate that it cannot obtain the internal inspection tools within the required reassessment
period and that the actions the operator is taking in the interim ensure the integrity of the covered
segment.
(2) Maintain product supply. An operator may be able to justify a longer reassessment
period for a covered segment if the operator demonstrates that it cannot maintain local product
supply if it conducts the reassessment within the required interval.
(b) How to apply. If one of the conditions specified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section
applies, an operator may seek a waiver of the required reassessment interval. An operator must
apply for a waiver in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 60118(c), at least 180 days before the end of the
required reassessment interval, unless local product supply issues make the period impractical. If
local product supply issues make the period impractical, an operator must apply for the waiver as
soon as the need for the waiver becomes known.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 GENERAL
OPS allows waivers in limited instances. A waiver is not required in the following situations.
(a) When reassessment intervals established are more frequent than those required by §192.939.
(b) Where an Integrity Management Program meets the criteria for exceptional performance in
§192.913.
3 WAIVER APPLICATIONS
§192.945
What methods must an operator use to measure program effectiveness?
\ [Effective Date: 7-10-06]
(a) General. An operator must include in its integrity management program methods to
measure, on a semi-annual basis, whether the program is effective in assessing and evaluating the
integrity of each covered pipeline segment and in protecting the high consequence areas. These
measures must include the four overall performance measures specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7), section 9.4, and the specific measures for each identified
threat specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A. An operator must submit the four overall
performance measures, by electronic or other means, on a semi-annual frequency to OPS in
accordance with § 192.951. An operator must submit its first report on overall performance
measures by August 31, 2004. Thereafter, the performance measures must be complete through
June 30 and December 31 of each year and must be submitted within 2 months after those dates.
(b) External corrosion direct assessment. In addition to the general requirements for
performance measures in paragraph (a) of this section, an operator using direct assessment to
assess the external corrosion threat must define and monitor measures to determine the
effectiveness of the ECDA process. These measures must meet the requirements of §192.925.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004;
Amdt. 192-103, 71 FR 33402, June 9, 2006]
GUIDE MATERIAL
§192.947
What records must an operator keep?
[Effective Date: 4-6-04]
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
An operator must maintain, for the useful life of the pipeline, records that demonstrate
compliance with the requirements of this subpart. At minimum, an operator must maintain the
following records for review during an inspection.
(a) A written integrity management program in accordance with §192.907;
(b) Documents supporting the threat identification and risk assessment in accordance with
§192.917;
(c) A written baseline assessment plan in accordance with§192.919;
(d) Documents to support any decision, analysis and process developed and used to
implement and evaluate each element of the baseline assessment plan and integrity management
program. Documents include those developed and used in support of any identification, calculation,
amendment, modification, justification, deviation and determination made, and any action taken to
implement and evaluate any of the program elements;
(e) Documents that demonstrate personnel have the required training, including a description
of the training program, in accordance with §192.915;
(f) Schedule required by §192.933 that prioritizes the conditions found during an assessment
for evaluation and remediation, including technical justifications for the schedule.
(g) Documents to carry out the requirements in §§192.923 through 192.929 for a direct
assessment plan;
(h) Documents to carry out the requirements in §192.931 for confirmatory direct assessment;
(i) Verification that an operator has provided any documentation or notification required by this
subpart to be provided to OPS, and when applicable, a State authority with which OPS has an
interstate agent agreement, and a State or local pipeline safety authority that regulates a covered
pipeline segment within that State.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004 and Amdt. 192-95 Correction & Petition for Reconsideration, 69 FR 18228, Apr. 6, 2004]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1.1 General.
Operators should maintain, for the useful life of the pipeline, documents to support decisions, analyses,
and processes related to development, implementation, and evaluation of the integrity management
program.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
technical justification for those changes. Documentation might include historical and current records as
follows.
(a) Schedules.
(b) Threat lists and assessment methods.
(c) Direct assessment plans.
(d) Environmental and safety procedures.
Documentation for employee training and qualification might include the following.
(a) Training curriculum.
(b) Training outlines.
(c) Training schedules.
(d) Sample tests.
(e) Employee training records.
3 ONGOING ACTIVITY
4 REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE
Documentation of correspondence with OPS and state pipeline safety authorities relating to integrity
management issues should be retained.
§192.949
How does an operator notify OPS?
[Effective Date: 3-8-05]
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004; RIN 2137-AD77, 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
See the following sections for information regarding specific notification requirements.
(a) Section 192.909, when the operator makes substantial changes to the Integrity Management
Program. Notifications include the following information.
(1) Operator name and ID.
(2) Description and reason for the program or schedule change.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(b) Sections 192.921 and 192.937, when the operator makes use of technologies for assessment
other than internal inspection tools, pressure tests, or direct assessment. Notifications include
the following information.
(1) Operator name and ID.
(2) Description and rationale for new technology.
(3) Where the technology will be used.
(4) Procedures for applying the technology.
(5) Procedures for qualifying persons performing the assessment and analyzing the results.
(c) Section 192.927, when ICDA is used to assess a covered segment with an electrolyte present in
the gas stream. Notifications include the following information.
(1) Operator name and ID.
(2) Description of system.
(3) Justification for using ICDA.
(4) How public safety will be maintained.
(d) Section 192.933, when the operator cannot meet the schedule and cannot provide safety
through temporary pressure reduction. Notifications include the following information.
(1) Operator name and ID.
(2) Reason why the schedule cannot be met or temporary pressure reduction cannot be
implemented.
(3) How public safety will be maintained.
2 NOTIFICATION METHODS
3 REFERENCE
OPS Advisory Bulletin ADB-05-04 (70 FR 43939, July 29, 2005), accessible via the Federal Register
(FR) at www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/advanced.html.
§192.951
Where does an operator file a report?
[Effective Date3-8-05]
An operator must send any performance report required by this subpart to the Information
Resources Manager —
(1) By mail to the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room 7128, 400 Seventh Street S.W.,
Washington, DC 20590;
(2) Via facsimile to (202) 366-7128; or
(3) Through the online reporting system provided by OPS for electronic reporting available
at the OPS Home Page at http://ops.dot.gov.
[Issued by Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003 with Amdt. 192-95 Correction, 69 FR 2307, Jan
15, 2004; RIN 2137-AD77, 70 FR 11135, Mar. 8, 2005]
GUIDE MATERIAL
1 REQUIRED REPORTS
See the following sections for information regarding specific reporting requirements.
(a) Section 192.945, regarding performance measures.
(b) Section 192.913, regarding additional performance measures for exceptional performance
programs.
(c) Sections 192.913 and 192.945 do not require reporting to state pipeline safety authorities.
However, intrastate operators should consider submitting a copy of the reports to their state
authorities.
2 REPORTING METHOD
An operator should use only one reporting option to OPS; that is, by mail, via facsimile, or by going
online electronically. Use the website listed in §192.949 to obtain the current mailing address or
facsimile telephone number for notifications.
ASTM A691—Steel pipe, ‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-
Welded for High-Pressure Service at High Temperatures’’ (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7).
ASTM D2513—Thermoplastic pipe and tubing, ‘‘Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas
Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings’’ (incorporated by reference, see §192.7).
ASTM D2517—Thermosetting plastic pipe and tubing, ‘‘Standard Specification for Reinforced Epoxy
Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings’’ (incorporated by reference, see §192.7).
For pipe more than 2 inches (51 millimeters) in diameter, the pipe must meet the requirements of the
flattening tests set forth in ASTM A53, except that the number of tests must be at least equal to the
minimum required in paragraph II-D of this appendix to determine yield strength.
B. Weldability. A girth weld must be made in the pipe by a welder who is qualified under
subpart E of this part. The weld must be made under the most severe conditions under which
welding will be allowed in the field and by means of the same procedure that will be used in the field.
On pipe more than 4 inches (102 millimeters) in diameter, at least one test weld must be made for
each 100 lengths of pipe. On pipe 4 inches (102 millimeters) or less in diameter, at least one test
weld must be made for each 400 lengths of pipe. The weld must be tested in accordance with API
Standard 1104 (incorporated by reference, see §192.7). If the requirements of API Standard 1104
cannot be met, weldability may be established by making chemical tests for carbon and manganese,
and proceeding in accordance with section IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
(incorporated by reference, see §192.7). The same number of chemical tests must be made as are
required for testing a girth weld.
C. Inspection. The pipe must be clean enough to permit adequate inspection. It must be
visually inspected to ensure that it is reasonably round and straight and there are no defects which
might impair the strength or tightness of the pipe.
D. Tensile Properties. If the tensile properties of the pipe are not known, the minimum yield
strength may be taken as 24,000 p.s.i. (165 MPa) or less, or the tensile properties may be established
by performing tensile tests as set forth in API Specification 5L (incorporated by reference, see
§192.7). All test specimens shall be selected at random and the following number of tests must be
performed:
If the yield-tensile ratio, based on the properties determined by those tests, exceeds 0.85, the pipe
may be used only as provided in §192.55(c).
III. Steel pipe manufactured before November 12, 1970, to earlier editions of listed specifications.
Steel pipe manufactured before November 12, 1970, in accordance with a specification of which
a later edition is listed in section I of this Appendix, is qualified for use under this part if the
following requirements are met:
A. Inspection. The pipe must be clean enough to permit adequate inspection. It must be
visually inspected to ensure that it is reasonably round and straight and that there are no defects
which might impair the strength or tightness of the pipe.
B. Similarity of specification requirements. The edition of the listed specification under which
the pipe was manufactured must have substantially the same requirements with respect to the
following properties as a later edition of that specification listed in section I of this Appendix:
(1) Physical (mechanical) properties of pipe, including yield and tensile strength,
elongation, and yield to tensile ratio, and testing requirements to verify those properties.
(2) Chemical properties of pipe and testing requirements to verify those properties.
C. Inspection or test of welded pipe. On pipe with welded seams, one of the following
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17659, Nov. 17, 1970; Amdt. 192-12, 38 FR 4760, Feb. 22, 1973; Amdt. 192-19, 40
FR 10471, Mar. 6, 1975; Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31, 1976; Amdt. 192-32, 43 FR 18553, May 1,
1978; Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-41, 47 FR 41381, Sept. 20, 1982; Amdt. 192-
51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, 1986; Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22, 1988; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625,
Feb. 6, 1989; Amdt. 192-65, 54 FR 32344, Aug. 7, 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993;
Amdt. 192-76 Correction, 61 FR 36825, July 15, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004 with Amdt. 192-94 Correction, 69 FR 54591, Sept. 9, 2004;
GUIDE MATERIAL
For the specified minimum yield strength of various grades of steel pipe covered by Part 192 and
specifications listed in Section I of Appendix B to Part 192, see Guide Material Appendix G-192-2.
Reserved
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
All references are to Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Reporting requirements are contained
in Part 191, “Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports
and Safety Related Condition Reports.” Except as provided in §191.11(b), each operator of a natural
gas distribution line (see definitions below) must submit an annual report Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1 for
the preceding calendar year not later than March 15th. Be sure to report TOTAL miles of main
pipeline and services in the system at the end of the reporting year, including additions to the system
during the year. The annual reporting period is on a calendar basis ending on December 31st of each
year.
Reports for intrastate pipelines subject to the jurisdiction of a State agency pursuant to certification
under 49 U.S.C. § 60105 may be submitted in duplicate to the State agency if the regulations of that
agency require the submission of these reports and provide for further transmittal of one copy not later
than March 15th to the Information Resources Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, S.W., Room
2103, PHP-10, Washington, DC 20590.
Use one of the following methods to submit your report. We prefer online reporting over
hardcopy submissions. If you prefer, then you can mail or fax your completed reports to
DOT/PHMSA.
Methods:
1. Online:
a. Navigate to the OPS Home Page http://ops.dot.gov, click the ONLINE DATA
ENTRY box at the top right corner of the screen
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
b. Click on the Annual Gas Distribution Systems Report name
c. Enter Operator ID and PIN
d. Click add to begin
e. Click submit when finished. NOTE: For supplemental reports use steps 1a and 1b
then click on the report ID to make corrections. Click save when finished.
f. A confirmation page will appear for you to print and save for your records
If you do file online, please do not mail or fax the completed report to DOT as this may
cause data entry errors.
2. Mail to:
DOT/PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety
Information Resources Manager,
400 7th Street SW
Room 2103, PHP-10
Washington, DC 20590
IMPORTANT: The Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1 has three total columns added to the form that we
revised this year:
1) Part B- System Description Section 1 now has a Total column” for summarizing rows,
2) Part B- System Description Section 2 now has a Total column” for summarizing rows,
3) Part B- System Description Section 3 now has a Total column” for summarizing rows.
If you need copies of the Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1 and/or instructions they can be found on the
Office of Pipeline Safety home page, http://ops.dot.gov, by clicking the FORMS tab or OPS
FORMS section of the ONLINE LIBRARY. If you have questions about this report or these
instructions, please call (202)366-8861 or (202)366-8075. Please type or print all entries when
submitting forms by mail.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
2. “Gathering line” means a pipeline that transports gas from a current production facility
to a transmission line or main.
Make an entry in each block for which data are available. Estimate data if necessary. Avoid
entering mileage in the UNKNOWN columns, if possible. Some companies may have very old
pipe for which installation records do not exist. Estimate the total of such mileage in the
UNKNOWN section of item 4: “Miles of Main and Number of Services by Decade of Installation.”
Please round all mileage to the nearest 3 decimal positions. DO NOT USE FRACTIONS.
Examples of rounding are as follows: 3/8 should round to 0.375; 3/4 should round to 0.75 and ½
should round to 0.5.
The total miles of main and services reported in Part B sections 1 through 4 MUST all sum to the
same totals in the appropriate rows. Please do not to report miles of main in feet. If necessary,
please convert feet into a decimal notation (e.g. 1,320 feet = .25 miles).
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
Enter the Calendar Year for which the report is being filed. Check Initial Report if this is the
original filing for this calendar year. Check Supplemental Report if this is a follow-up to a
previously filed report to amend or correct information. On Supplemental Reports, please complete
Part A and only amended, revised, or added information for Parts B, C, D, E and F.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The operator's five digit identification number appears on the PHMSA mailing label (without
leading zeroes when less than 10000). If the person completing the report does not have the
operator identification number, they should contact the Information Resources Manager or PHMSA
at (202) 366-8075 for the five-digit operator identification number.
Provide the address where you would like PHMSA to mail forms and the phone number where
PHMSA can contact you regarding this report. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration assigns the operator’s five-digit identification number. Contact PHMSA at (202) 366-
8075 if you need assistance with determining your operator’s five-digit identification number.
Enter the State for which information is being reported. Submit a separate report for each
State in which the company operates a gas distribution pipeline system.
“Coated” means pipe coated with any effective hot or cold applied dielectric coating or wrapper.
“Other” means a pipe of any material not specifically designated on the form. If you check “other
pipe,” describe it in Part F.
“Number of services” is the number of service lines, not the number of customers served.
Provide miles of main and numbers of services by decade installed in Part B, section 4.
If you do not know the decade of installation of the pipe because there are no records containing
such information, enter an estimate in the UNKNOWN column. The sum total of mileage and
numbers of services reported for Part B, section 4 should match total mileage and numbers of
services reported in sections 1, 2, and 3 in Part B.
A leak is defined as an unintentional escape of gas from the pipeline. A non-hazardous release that
can be eliminated by lubrication, adjustment, or tightening, is not a leak.
Include all leaks eliminated by repair, replacement or other reason during the reporting year. Also
include leaks reported on form PHMSA 7100.1, “Incident Report Gas Distribution Systems.” A
reportable incident is one described in §191.3. Do not include test failures.
CORROSION: leak resulting from a hole in the pipe or other component that galvanic, bacterial,
chemical, stray current, or other corrosive action causes.
NATURAL FORCES: leak resulting from earth movements, earthquakes, landslides, subsidence,
lightning, heavy rains/floods, washouts, flotation, mudslide, scouring, temperature, frost heave,
frozen components, high winds, or similar natural causes.
EXCAVATION: leak resulting from damage caused by earth moving or other equipment, tools, or
vehicles. Include leaks from damage by operator's personnel or contractor or people not associated
with the operator.
OTHER OUTSIDE FORCE DAMAGE: Include leaks caused by fire or explosion and deliberate
or willful acts, such as vandalism.
MATERIAL AND WELDS: leak resulting from failure of original sound material from force
applied during construction that caused a dent, gouge, excessive stress, or other defect that
eventually resulted in a leak. This includes leaks due to faulty wrinkle bends, faulty field welds,
and damage sustained in transportation to the construction or fabrication site. Also include leak
resulting from a defect in the pipe material, component, or the longitudinal weld or seam due to
faulty manufacturing procedures. Leaks from material deterioration, other then corrosion, after
exceeding the reasonable service life, are reported under Other.
OTHER: leak resulting from any other cause, such as exceeding the service life, not attributable to
the above causes.
Federal Lands: As defined in 30 U.S.C. §185, federal lands means “all lands owned by the United
States except lands in the National Park System, lands held in trust for an Indian or Indian tribe, and
GasDistAnnualInstructions 122005 Final 7100 1-1.doc 4
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
lands on the Outer Continental Shelf.” Indicate only those leaks repaired, eliminated, or scheduled for
repair during the reporting year, including those incidents reported on Form PHMSA F 7100.1.
“Unaccounted for gas” is gas lost; that is, gas that the operator cannot account for as usage or through
appropriate adjustment. Adjustments are appropriately made for such factors as variations in
temperature, pressure, meter-reading cycles, or heat content; calculable losses from construction,
purging, line breaks, etc., where specific data are available to allow reasonable calculation or estimate;
or other similar factors.
State the amount of unaccounted for gas as a percent of total input for the 12 months ending June 30 of
the reporting year.
[(Purchased gas + produced gas) minus (customer use + company use + appropriate
adjustments)] divided by (purchased gas + produced gas) equals percent unaccounted for.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Do not report “gained” gas. If a net gain of gas is indicated by the calculations, report “0%” here.
(Decimal or fractional percentages may be entered.)
Include any additional information which will assist in clarifying or classifying the reported data.
PREPARER is the name of the person most knowledgeable about the report or the person to be
contacted for more information. Please include the direct phone number and email address.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE may be the preparer, an officer, or other person whom the operator
has designated to review and sign reports. Please include the direct phone number and email address.
If submitting via the Online Data Entry System your Operator ID and PIN take the place of the
Authorized Signature.
Blank Sheet
INSTRUCTIONS
Important: Please read the separate instructions for completing this form before you begin. They clarify the information
requested and provide specific examples. If you do not have a copy of the instructions, you can obtain one from
the Office of Pipeline Safety Web Page at http://ops.dot.gov.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
/ / / / / /
2. LOCATION OF OFFICE WHERE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 5. HEADQUARTERS NAME & ADDRESS, IF DIFFERENT
MAY BE OBTAINED
3. STATE IN WHICH SYSTEM OPERATES: / / / (provide a separate report for each state in which system operates)
1. GENERAL - MILES OF PIPELINE IN THE SYSTEM AT END OF YEAR THAT ARE JURISDICTIONAL TO OPS
STEEL
CATHODICALLY CAST IRON PLASTIC
UNPROTECTED OTHER PIPE TOTAL
PROTECTED WROUGHT IRON PIPE PIPE
BARE COATED BARE COATED
TRANSMISSION
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
GATHERING
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
SYSTEM TOTALS
2. MILES OF PIPE BY NOMINAL SIZE
4” OR OVER 4” OVER 10” OVER 20” OVER
UNKNOWN TOTAL
LESS THRU 10” THRU 20” THRU 28” 28”
TRANSMISSION
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
GATHERING
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
SYSTEM TOTALS
3. MILES OF PIPE BY DECADE OF INSTALLATION
UNKNOWN PRE- 1940- 1950- 1960- 1970- 1980- 1990- 2000-
TOTAL
1940 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009
TRANSMISSION
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
GATHERING
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE
SYSTEM TOTALS
4. MILES OF PIPE BY CLASS LOCATION
CLASS 1 CLASS 2 CLASS 3 CLASS 4 TOTAL
TRANSMISSION
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE N/A N/A N/A
GATHERING
ONSHORE
OFFSHORE N/A N/A N/A
SYSTEM TOTALS
Form PHMSA F 7100.2-1 (12/05) Continue on Next Page
Reproduction of this form is permitted.
CORROSION ONSHORE
NATURAL OFFSHORE
FORCES
1. TRANSMISSION
2. GATHERING
PART F - PREPARER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
(type or print) Preparer's Name and Title Area Code and Telephone Number
Name and Title of Person Signing Area Code and Telephone Number
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Reporting requirements are in Part 191 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Annual Reports, Incident Reports, and
Safety-Related Condition Reports. Annual reports must be submitted by March 15th for the
preceding calendar year. Report TOTAL miles of pipeline in the system at the end of the
reporting year, including additions to the system during that year. Please note that Operators
operating less than one (1) mile of pipeline are not required to file an annual report.
Each transmission system or non-rural gathering system operator is required to file an annual
report. The terms operator, distribution line, gathering line, and transmission line are defined in
'192.3 of the CFR. If an operator determines that pipelines fall under the definition for
distribution lines, he or she should follow the instructions for Form PHMSA F 7100.1-1.
Use one of the following methods to submit your report. We prefer online reporting over
hardcopy submissions. If you prefer, then you can mail or fax your completed reports to
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
DOT/PHMSA.
Methods:
1. Online:
a. Navigate to the OPS Home Page http://ops.dot.gov, click the ONLINE DATA
ENTRY box at the top right corner of the screen
b. Click on the Annual Gas Transmission and Gathering Systems Report name
c. Enter Operator ID and PIN
d. Click add to begin
e. Click submit when finished. NOTE: For supplemental reports use steps 1a and
1b then click on the report ID to make corrections. Click save when finished.
f. A confirmation page will appear for you to print and save for your records
If you do file online, please do not mail or fax the completed report to DOT as this
may cause data entry errors.
2. Mail to:
DOT/PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety
Information Resources Manager,
400 7th Street SW
Room 2103, PHP-10
Washington, DC 20590
If you need copies of the Form PHMSA F 7100.2-1 and/or instructions they can be found on the
Office of Pipeline Safety home page, http://ops.dot.gov, by clicking the FORMS tab or OPS
FORMS section of the ONLINE LIBRARY. If you have questions about this report or these
instructions, please call (202)366-8861 or (202)366-8075. Please type or print all entries when
submitting forms by mail.
Please round all mileage to the nearest 3 decimal positions. DO NOT USE FRACTIONS.
Examples of rounding are as follows: 3/8 should round to 0.375; 3/4 should round to 0.75 and ½
should round to 0.5.
The total mileage reported in Part B sections 1 through 4 MUST all sum to the same totals in the
appropriate rows. Please do not to report miles of pipeline in feet. If necessary, please convert
feet into a decimal notation (e.g. 1,320 feet = .25 miles).
Make an entry in each block for which data is available. Estimate data if necessary. Please
avoid entering mileage in the UNKNOWN columns where possible. We recognize that some
companies may have very old pipe for which installation records may not exist. Enter estimate
of the total of such mileage in the UNKNOWN section of item 3: “Miles of Pipe by Decade of
Installation”.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
Enter the Calendar Year for which the report is being filed. Check Initial Report if this is the
original filing for this calendar year. Check Supplemental Report if this is a follow-up to a
previously filed report to amend or correct information. On Supplemental Reports, please
complete Part A and only amended, revised, or added information for Parts B, C, D and E.
Insert the operator name and address data. Report the address where additional information can
be found.
The operator's five digit identification number appears on the PHMSA mailing label (without
leading zeroes when less than 10000). If the person completing the report does not have the
operator identification number, they should contact the Information Resources Manager or
PHMSA at (202) 366-8075 for the five-digit operator identification number.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The mileage of pipeline supplied in Part B, sections 1 and 2, will be used to better protect people
and the environment. Mileage reported should accurately reflect miles of pipe meeting the
PHMSA gas transmission and non-rural gathering line definitions. In the past, short segments of
pipeline operated by distribution systems at less than 20 percent of the specified minimum yield
strength (SMYS) have sometimes been inaccurately reported as transmission lines. Please
carefully consider all reported pipelines classifications.
COATED means pipe coated with an effective hot or cold applied dielectric coating or wrapper.
OTHER PIPE means a pipe made of material not specifically designated on the form, such as
copper, aluminum, etc. Enter the Other Pipe material, either in the column heading or by an
attachment if mileage of Other Pipe is shown.
Include Outer Continental Shelf pipelines under offshore in Part B, sections No. 1 and No. 2.
Provide miles of pipe by decade installed in Part B, section 3. Estimate if exact totals aren’t
known. Where decade of installation is not known because records do not exist for such
information, enter an estimate of this mileage in the UNKNOWN column. The sum total of
mileage reported for Part B, section 3 should match total mileage reported in Part B sections 1, 2,
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
and 4.
Provide miles of pipe by class location in Part B, section 4. Class location is defined in 49 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part '192.5. These definitions are provided in Appendix A,
below. All offshore mileage is Class 1.
Include all reportable leaks or ruptures and non-reportable leaks or ruptures repaired or
eliminated including replaced pipe or other component during the calendar year. Do not include
test failures.
Leaks are unintentional escapes of gas from the pipeline. A non-hazardous release that can be
eliminated by lubrication, adjustment, or tightening is not a leak.
A reportable leak is one that meets the specific criteria of '191.5 and is reported on Form
PHMSA F 7100.2, Incident Report - Gas Transmission and Gathering Systems. A non-
reportable leak is one that is not reported under '191.5.
CORROSION: leak resulting from a hole in the pipe or other component that galvanic,
bacterial, chemical, stray current, or other corrosive action causes.
EXCAVATION: leak resulting from damage caused by earth moving or other equipment, tools,
or vehicles. Include leaks from damage by operator's personnel or contractor or people not
associated with the operator.
OTHER OUTSIDE FORCE DAMAGE: Include leaks caused by fire or explosion and
deliberate or willful acts, such as vandalism.
MATERIAL AND WELDS: leak resulting from failure of original sound material from force
applied during construction that caused a dent, gouge, excessive stress, or other defect that
eventually resulted in a leak. This includes leaks due to faulty wrinkle bends, faulty field welds,
and damage sustained in transportation to the construction or fabrication site. Also include leak
resulting from a defect in the pipe material, component, or the longitudinal weld or seam due to
faulty manufacturing procedures. Leaks from material deterioration, other then corrosion, after
exceeding the reasonable service life, are reported under Other.
OTHER: leak resulting from any other cause, such as exceeding the service life, not attributable
to the above causes.
FEDERAL LANDS means All lands owned by the United States except lands in the National
Park System, lands held in trust for an Indian or Indian tribe, and lands on the Outer Continental
Shelf.", as defined in 30 USC Section 185.
Enter all leaks repaired, eliminated, or scheduled for repair during the reporting year, including
those reported as incidents on Form PHMSA F 7100.2.
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF pipelines are separated to differentiate from other Federal
offshore areas, which could be within a lake or river.
Include all known leaks scheduled for elimination by repairing or by replacing pipe or some
other component.
GasTransAnnualInstructions 122005 Final 7100 2-1.doc 4
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
PREPARER is the name of the person most knowledgeable about the report or the person to be
contacted for more information. Please include the direct phone number and email address.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE may be the preparer, an officer, or other person whom the
operator has designated to review and sign reports. Please include the direct phone number and
email address. If submitting via the Online Data Entry System your Operator ID and PIN take the
place of the Authorized Signature.
APPENDIX A
(a) This section classifies pipeline locations for purposes of this part. The following criteria
apply to classifications under this section.
(1) A ``class location unit'' is an onshore area that extends 220 yards (200 meters) on either
side of the centerline of any continuous 1- mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline.
(2) Each separate dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling unit building is counted as a separate
building intended for human occupancy.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, pipeline locations are classified as
follows:
(1) A Class 1 location is:
(i) An offshore area; or
(ii) Any class location unit that has 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy.
(2) A Class 2 location is:
(i) Any class location unit that has more than 10 but fewer than 46 buildings intended for
human occupancy.
(3) A Class 3 location is:
(i) Any class location unit that has 46 or more buildings intended for human occupancy; or
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(ii) An area where the pipeline lies within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or a
small, well-defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other
place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10
weeks in any 12-month period. (The days and weeks need not be consecutive.)
(4) A Class 4 location is any class location unit where buildings with four or more stories
above ground are prevalent.
(c) The length of Class locations 2, 3, and 4 may be adjusted as follows:
(1) A Class 4 location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building with four or
more stories above ground.
(2) When a cluster of buildings intended for human occupancy requires a Class 2 or 3 location,
the class location ends 220 yards (200 meters) from the nearest building in the cluster.
Blank Sheet
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The publications listed below provide information on pipe, components, specifications, and topics other
than those covered currently or previously by Part 192. The list is intended to include all such
publications referenced throughout the guide material. For some publication titles, certain initial words
have been omitted for brevity, e.g., ASTM B 43, "Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe,
Standard Sizes" is presented here as "Seamless Red Brass Pipe, Standard Sizes." Under some
conditions, the application of the information is limited by provisions of Part 192 and this Guide. See
Editorial Conventions of the Guide for explanation of "Discontinued." Most material specifications,
codes, standards, and many other documents have been developed and approved in accordance with
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) procedures and typically carry added identification
referencing ANSI. Such identification is not routinely shown in the Guide. The appropriate guide
material section is listed for each publication where applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the publications
listed below are the latest available editions.
1.3 VALVES
[See other related references under 1.4 Fittings-Flanged and 1.7 Fittings-Miscellaneous]
API Std 600 Bolted Bonnet Steel Gate Valves for Petroleum and Natural §192.145
Gas Industries
ASME B16.33 Manually Operated Metallic Gas Valves for Use in Gas §192.145
Piping Systems Up to 125 psig (Sizes NPS ½ - NPS 2)
ASME B16.34 Valves - Flanged, Threaded, and Welding End §192.145
ASME B16.38 Large Metallic Valves for Gas Distribution (Manually §192.145
Operated, NPS 2½ to 12, 125 psig Max)
ASTM A420 Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel for
Low-Temperature Service
MSS SP-75 High Test Wrought Butt Welding Fittings §192.149
§192.157
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Valves
MSS SP-115 Excess Flow Valves for Natural Gas Service §192.381
NBBI Relieving Capacities of Safety Valves and Relief Valves §192.201
Approved by the National Board (Discontinued)
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2 GOVERNMENTAL DOCUMENTS
NTSB Report Pipeline Accident Brief -- Fire and Explosion, Midwest Gas §192.613
PAB-98-02 Company, Waterloo, Iowa, October 17, 1994
NTSB Report Special Investigation Report -- Brittle-Like Cracking in §192.613
SIR-98-01 Plastic Pipe for Gas Service
OPS Common Ground -- Study of One-Call Systems and §192.614
Damage Prevention Best Practices, August 1999
OPS ADB-99-01 Advisory Bulletin -- Susceptibility of Certain Polyethylene §192.613
Pipe Manufactured by Century Utility Products, Inc. to
Premature Failure Due to Brittle-Like Cracking (64 FR
12211, Mar. 11, 1999)
OPS ADB-99-02 Advisory Bulletin -- Potential Susceptibility of Plastic Pipe §192.613
Installed Between the [Years] 1960 and the Early 1980s to
Premature Failure Due to Brittle-Like Cracking (64 FR
12212, Mar. 11, 1999)
OPS ADB-02-06 Advisory Bulletin -- Definition of Onshore Gas Gathering §192.9
Lines (67 FR 64447, Oct. 18, 2002)
OPS ADB-02-07 Advisory Bulletin -- Notification of the Susceptibility to §192.613
Premature Brittle-Like Cracking of Older Plastic Pipe (67
FR 70806, Nov. 26, 2002 with Correction, 67 FR 72027,
Dec. 3, 2002)
OPS ADB-04-01 Advisory Bulletin -- Hazards Associated with De-Watering §192.515
of Pipelines (69 FR 58225, Sept. 29, 2004)
OPS ADB-05-04 Advisory Bulletin - Notification Required by the Integrity §192.949
Management Regulations in 49 CFR Part 192, Subpart O
(70 FR 43939, July 29, 2005)
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4 PUBLISHING ORGANIZATIONS
The specifications, codes, standards, and other documents listed in Sections 1 and 2 are published by
the following organizations:
ASTM ASTM International (Formerly American Society for Testing and Materials)
100 Barr Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
Phone: 610/832-9585
FAX: 610/832-9555
On line: www.astm.org
On line: www.aws.org
SSPC Steel Structures Painting Council (Name changed in 1997 to SSPC: The Society for
Protective Coatings)
SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
40 24th Street, 6th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4656
Phone: 877/281-7772
FAX: 412/281-9992
On line: www.sspc.org
UL Underwriters Laboratories
333 Pfingsten Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-2096
Phone: 847/272-8800
FAX: 847/272-8129
On line: www.ul.com
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Battelle Battelle
505 King Avenue
Columbus, OH 43201-2693
Phone: 614/424-6393
FAX: 614/424-3819
On line: www.battelle.org
BOCA Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc. (Replaced in 1994 by the
or International Codes Council)
ICC International Codes Council
5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 600
Falls Church, VA 22041
Phone: 888/422-7233
FAX: Birmingham, AL 205-592-7001
Chicago, IL 708/799-4981
Wittier, CA 562/699-4522
On line: www.iccsafe.org
Techstreet Techstreet
777 East Eisenhower Parkway
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
Phone: 800/699-9277
Fax: 734/913-3946
On line: www.techstreet.com
Asterisk (*) marked entries show documents no longer included for reference in §192.7.
(13)* ASTM A539, Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Coiled Steel Tubing for Gas
and Fuel Oil Lines (1965, 1973, 1979) (Discontinued and replaced by ASTM A 450).
(14) ASTM A671, Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures (1977, 1989a, 1994, 1996).
(15) ASTM A672, Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure
Service at Moderate Temperatures (1979, 1989b, 1994, 1996).
(16) ASTM A691, Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for
High-Pressure Service at High Temperatures (1979, 1989a, 1993, 1998).
(17)* ASTM B42, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Pipe, Standard Sizes (1962, 1966, 1972,
1980).
(18)* ASTM B68, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube, Bright Annealed (1965, 1968,
1973, 1980).
(19)* ASTM B75, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube (1965, 1968, 1973, 1980).
(20)* ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube (1966, 1972, 1980, 1999).
(21)* ASTM B251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper and
Copper-Alloy Tube (1966, 1968, 1972, 1976).
(22) ASTM D638, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (1977a, 1991, 1995, 1996,
1999).
(23) ASTM D2513, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings
(1966T, 1968, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974a, 1978ES, 1981, 1987 except for §192.63(a)(1), 1990c,
1995c, 1996).
(24) ASTM D2517, Standard Specification for Reinforced Epoxy Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings
(1966T, 1967, 1973, 1981-reapproved 1987, 1994).
(25) ASTM F1055, Standard Specification for Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside
Diameter Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing (1995).
C American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI) or ANSI/The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME)
(1)* ANSI A21.1, Thickness Design of Cast-Iron Pipe (1967, 1972) (Discontinued and not replaced).
(2)* ANSI A21.3, Specification for Cast-Iron Pit Cast Pipe for Gas (1953) (Discontinued and not
replaced).
(3)* ANSI A21.7, Cast-Iron Pipe Centrifugally Cast in Metal Molds for Gas (1962) (Discontinued and
not replaced).
(4)* ANSI A21.9, Cast-Iron Pipe Centrifugally Cast in Sand-Lined Molds for Gas (1962) (Discontinued
and not replaced).
(5)* ANSI A21.11, Rubber-Gasket Joints for Ductile-Iron Pressure Pipe and Fittings (1964, 1972,
1979) (Discontinued and not replaced).
(6)* ANSI A21.50, Thickness Design of Ductile-Iron Pipe (1965, 1971, 1976) (Discontinued and not
replaced).
(7)* ANSI A21.52, Ductile-Iron Pipe, Centrifugally Cast for Gas (1965, 1971, 1976) (Discontinued and
not replaced).
(8) ANSI B16.1, Cast-Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (1967, 1975, 1989).
(9) ANSI B16.5, Steel Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (1968, 1973, 1977, 1988 with October 1988
Errata and B16.5a-1992 Addenda, 1996 and B16.5a-1998 Addenda).
(10)* ANSI B16.24, Cast Copper Alloy Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (1962, 1971, 1979) (Source:
ASME B16.24).
(11)* ANSI B36.10, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe (1959, 1970, 1979).
(12)* ANSI C1, National Electrical Code (1968, 1975).
(13)* ANSI C101-67, Thickness Design of Cast-Iron Pipe (1977) (Discontinued and not identified by
ANSI or ASME).
D American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI)/National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
(1) ANSI/NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code (1969, 1973, 1977, 1990, 1993, 1996).
(2) ANSI/NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code (1969, 1972, 1979, 1992, 1995, 1998).
(3) ANSI/NFPA 59, Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases at Utility
Gas Plants (1968, 1979, 1992, 1995, 1998).
(4)* ANSI/NFPA 59A, Production, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (1971, 1972, 1979).
(5) ANSI/NFPA 70, National Electrical Code (1978, 1993, 1996).
F Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valves and Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS)
(1)* MSS SP-25, Standard Marking System for Valves, Fittings, Flanges, and Unions (1964, 1978).
(2) MSS SP-44, Steel Pipeline Flanges (1955, 1972, 1975, 1991).
(3)* MSS SP-52, Cast-Iron Pipe Line Valves (1957) (Discontinued and not replaced).
(4)* MSS SP-70, Cast-Iron Gate Valves, Flanged and Threaded Ends (1970, 1976).
(5)* MSS SP-71, Cast-Iron Swing Check Valves, Flanged and Threaded Ends (1970, 1976).
(6)* MSS SP-78, Cast-Iron Plug Valves, Flanged and Threaded Ends (1972, 1977).
(1) PPI TR-3, Policies and Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB), Pressure
Design Basis (PDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB), and Minimum Required Strength (MRS)
Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Materials (2000).
Reserved
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
330
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND Guide Material Appendix G-192-15
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition
1 INTRODUCTION
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
These guidelines provide references for contemporary techniques (PC-PISCES and API RP 1102) and
the historical "Spangler Method" to design uncased pipeline crossings. Reference is also provided to a
specifications manual by the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association.
2 CONTEMPORARY TECHNIQUES
In 1985, the Gas Research Institute funded a research project to develop an improved method for the
design of uncased pipelines beneath railroads and highways. The study provided a more accurate
method (i.e., PC-PISCES) for design of uncased crossings. The findings of this study are incorporated
into the following publications.
(a) GRI-91/0283, "Guidelines for Pipelines Crossing Railroads."
(b) GRI-91/0284, "Guidelines for Pipelines Crossing Highways."
(c) GRI-91/0285, "Technical Summary and Database for Guidelines for Pipelines Crossing Railroads
and Highways."
(d) GRI-91/0285.1, "Executive Summary: Technical Summary and Database for Guidelines for
Pipelines Crossing Railroads and Highways."
(e) PRCI PC-PISCES, "Personal Computer - Pipeline Soil Crossing Evaluation System (PC-PISCES),"
Version 2.0 (Related to API RP 1102)
(f) API RP 1102, "Steel Pipelines Crossing Railroads and Highways."
3 HISTORICAL METHOD
Prior to the GRI study, the “Spangler Method” was used to design uncased crossings. This procedure
uses the design factors for uncased crossings specified in §192.111(b) and (c) along with various
factors applicable to the determination of external loading on the pipe resulting from both live and dead
loads. The factors used in determining the calculated external loading are variable and provide the
designer with flexibility to consider various soil and highway loading conditions.
The end result of the calculation procedure is a determination of the total hoop stress imposed on the
uncased pipeline by the operating pressure and the external loading from the soil and traffic over the
pipe. The calculation of total hoop stress may be used to confirm that the uncased pipeline will not be
subject to an excessive calculated stress level in service. The total calculated combined stress, ST,
should not exceed 100 percent SMYS.
PD 3K b WEDt
ST = SI + SE = +
2t E t 3 + 3K z P D3
10.4 LDI
W = 83.3 Cd δ B2D 10-3 +
π H 2 103
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Where:
ST = total calculated combined stress, psi (≤ 100 percent SMYS)
SI = hoop stress due to internal pressure, psi (as determined from the formula in §192.105
using design temperature derating and joint factors equal to 1)
SE = hoop stress due to external loading, psi (as determined based on the procedure
developed by Dr. M. G. Spangler, lowa State University)
P = internal pipeline pressure, psi (may not exceed the pressure determined from §192.105
using the design factors specified in §192.111)
D = outside pipe diameter, inches
t = nominal wall thickness, inches
Kb = bending parameter (See Table 192.111ii)
W = total external load, pounds/lineal inch of pipe (includes soil dead load and vehicular live
load)
E = modulus of elasticity of steel = 30 x 106 psi
Kz = deflection parameter (See Table 192.111ii)
Cd = load coefficient (See Table 192.111iii)
δ = unit weight of soil (120 pounds/cubic foot should be used unless the unit weight of
highway subsoil material is known)
BD = width of pipe trench or diameter of bored hole, feet
L = wheel load, pounds (the maximum wheel loading allowed by the governing authority
should be used)
I = impact factor (1.5 should be used for nonrigid pavement and 1.0 for rigid pavement)
H = height of soil over pipe, feet
Width of
Uniform Crossing Conditions Parameters
Support
Under Pipe
(Degrees)
Deflection Moment
Kz Kb
0 Consolidated Rock 0.110 0.294
30 Open Trench 0.108 0.235
60 ---- 0.103 0.189
90 Bored 0.096 0.157
120 ---- 0.089 0.138
150 ---- 0.085 0.128
180 ---- 0.083 0.125
1
Suggested parameters for various soil conditions are conservative. If width of support under pipe is known to
be different from examples shown in the first column, then appropriate parameters may be used. Use
parameter values for consolidated rock if bottom of the trench or bore is a mixture of soil and rock,
but is predominantly rock.
TABLE 192.111ii
398
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND Guide Material Appendix G-192-15
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition
Minimum
possible without Extreme
cohesion. These Ordinary maximum for
values give the maximum for clay (completely
loads generally Maximum for clay (thoroughly saturated).
imposed by ordinary sand. wet). These These values are
granular filling These values are values are safe only for
materials before safe for all Completely for all ordinary extremely
tamping or ordinary cases of saturated cases of clay unfavorable
setting. sand filling. topsoil filling. conditions.
H/B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
TABLE 192.111iii
Reprinted from Piping Handbook, Fourth Edition, J.H. Walker and Sabin Crocker, 1930, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY; data re-
affirmed in Sixth Edition, published 1992.
(a) AREMA provides specifications for pipelines installed within railroad rights-of-way. These specifications are contained in Part
5 – Pipelines of Chapter 1 – Roadway and Ballast in the AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering and are written for the chief
engineer (or authorized representative) of the railroad company.
(b) In accordance with the above manual, casing pipe for gas pipelines within the railroad right-of-way may be omitted provided
that the specifications provided in the manual are met by the operator and approved by the railroad.
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Addendum No. 6, September 2006 399
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT
GPTC GUIDE FOR GAS TRANSMISSION AND Guide Material Appendix G-192-15
DISTRIBUTION PIPING SYSTEMS: 2003 Edition
Reserved
--``,,,``,`````,``,``,,,`,,`,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
400
Copyright American Gas Association
Provided by IHS under license with AGA Licensee=BP International/5928366101
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 06/10/2007 17:12:53 MDT