Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Noble Metalfree Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts For Water Splitting2015chemical Society Reviews
Noble Metalfree Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts For Water Splitting2015chemical Society Reviews
www.rsc.org/chemsocrev
Registered charity number: 207890
Chem Soc Rev
View Article Online
REVIEW ARTICLE View Journal | View Issue
Sustainable hydrogen production is an essential prerequisite of a future hydrogen economy. Water electrolysis
driven by renewable resource-derived electricity and direct solar-to-hydrogen conversion based on
photochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting are promising pathways for sustainable hydrogen
production. All these techniques require, among many things, highly active noble metal-free hydrogen
evolution catalysts to make the water splitting process more energy-efficient and economical. In this review,
we highlight the recent research efforts toward the synthesis of noble metal-free electrocatalysts, especially at
the nanoscale, and their catalytic properties for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). We review several
important kinds of heterogeneous non-precious metal electrocatalysts, including metal sulfides, metal
selenides, metal carbides, metal nitrides, metal phosphides, and heteroatom-doped nanocarbons. In the
discussion, emphasis is given to the synthetic methods of these HER electrocatalysts, the strategies of
Received 2nd December 2014 performance improvement, and the structure/composition-catalytic activity relationship. We also summarize
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00448e some important examples showing that non-Pt HER electrocatalysts could serve as efficient cocatalysts for
promoting direct solar-to-hydrogen conversion in both photochemical and photoelectrochemical water
www.rsc.org/csr splitting systems, when combined with suitable semiconductor photocatalysts.
5148 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
Fig. 1 Three main pathways for industrial hydrogen production. electricity indirectly as the form of hydrogen.
The potential use of hydrogen, instead of petroleum-based
fuels, for transportation applications is attracting more and more
annually worldwide.24,25 Most of this hydrogen is used for attention. Hydrogen-powered vehicles (also known as fuel cell
industrial purposes, such as refining petroleum and producing electric vehicles, FCEVs) might offer performance similar to that
ammonia for fertilizers and other chemicals. There are currently of combustion ones, but better pollution control (zero emissions
three main pathways for hydrogen production industrially of CO2 and pollutants). Many of the world’s major car manu-
(Fig. 1), that is, steam methane reforming, coal gasification and factures, such as Ford, Toyota, BMW and Hyundai, have made
water electrolysis. Steam methane reforming and coal gasifica- their sustained efforts to bring FCEVs into clear and realistic
tion make more than 95% of the whole hydrogen, while only 4% future. If hydrogen-powered vehicles are to enter our lives, our
of the hydrogen is produced by water electrolysis. Obviously, demand for hydrogen will increase sharply. At that time, we
current primary hydrogen production is still strongly dependent would have to produce hydrogen on a larger scale in a more
on the fossil fuels—the finite and nonrenewable resource. environmentally friendly way.
The hydrogen production techniques based on fossil fuels Water electrolysis might be such a technique that can meet
cannot really solve the pollution and CO2 emission problems. our requirements (Fig. 2).26 However, the practical widespread
For example, during steam methane reformation, the high- application of this technique is constrained by its high cost.
temperature reaction between hydrocarbon and water results Although water electrolysis has a long history, continuous
in the simultaneous generation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide. technological improvement and material innovation are still
CO2 as a greenhouse gas is finally released into the atmosphere. highly desirable to drastically reduce the cost of this process. In
This hydrogen production method, apparently, violates our original particular, while Pt-based materials are the hydrogen evolution
intention—reducing air pollution and global warming by the catalysts for electrochemical water splitting, developing efficient
employment of hydrogen power. non-noble metal electrocatalysts, composed of earth-abundant
Among these three main hydrogen production pathways, elements, is quite appealing with the aim of providing cost-
water electrolysis still provides hope that it is possible to competitive hydrogen.28–32 Moreover, direct solar-to-hydrogen
produce hydrogen in a sustainable way, because its feedstock conversion based on photochemical and photoelectrochemical
is water—an abundant and renewable hydrogen source.26 But water splitting is another promising scheme for sustainable
this is still based on a premise that the hydrogen production hydrogen production (Fig. 2). Currently, direct solar-to-hydrogen
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5149
View Article Online
conversion is in the conceptualization stage still. But ongoing the water reduction reaction (or hydrogen evolution reaction).
technological progress will ultimately make this approach enter According to different media in which water splitting takes
the stage of actual application in the future. This also requires, place, the water splitting reaction can be expressed chemically
among many things, efficient hydrogen evolution catalysts, in different ways (see below).
preferably based on earth-abundant elements.33–36 Against Total reaction H2O - H2 + 1/2O2
such a backdrop, researchers have been exploring noble
metal-free hydrogen evolution (electro)catalysts with great In acidic solution
enthusiasm in the past few years, and their efforts have
already led to abundant achievements, especially with the Cathode 2H+ + 2e - H2
help of nanoscience and nanotechnology.33–36
In this review, we summarize recent developments in the area Anode H2O - 2H+ + 1/2O2 + 2e
of noble metal-free electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution
reaction (HER)—one of the two half reactions of the water In neutral and alkaline solutions
splitting reaction. We specially review several important kinds
Cathode 2H2O + 2e - H2 + 2OH
of heterogeneous non-precious metal electrocatalysts, including
metal sulfides, metal selenides, metal carbides, metal nitrides,
Anode 2OH - H2O + 1/2O2 + 2e
metal phosphides, and heteroatom-doped nanocarbons. In the
discussion, particular attention is paid to the synthetic methods
Regardless of the media in which water splitting takes place,
of these HER electrocatalysts, the strategies of performance
the thermodynamic voltage of water splitting is 1.23 V at 25 1C
improvement, and the structure/composition–catalytic activity
and 1 atm. It is worth noting that the thermodynamic voltage of
relationship. We also highlight the employment of HER electro-
water splitting is temperature-dependent, and it can be reduced
catalysts as non-Pt cocatalysts for promoting solar-to-hydrogen
by increasing the electrolytic temperature. However, in fact, we
conversion in both photochemical and photoelectrochemical
must apply voltages higher than the thermodynamic potential
water splitting systems. Based on the results achieved in this
value (i.e., 1.23 V at 25 1C) to achieve electrochemical water
area, several future directions are proposed and discussed
splitting. The excess potential (also known as overpotential, Z)
finally.
is mainly used to overcome the intrinsic activation barriers
present on both anode (Za) and cathode (Zc), as well as some
other resistances (Zother), such as solution resistance and contact
2. Electrochemistry of the hydrogen resistance. Thus, the practical operational voltage (Eop) for water
evolution reaction splitting can be described as:37
As shown in Fig. 3, an electrolyzer has three component parts: Eop = 1.23 V + Za + Zc + Zother
an electrolyte (i.e., H2O), a cathode and an anode. The hydrogen
evolution catalyst (HEC) and the oxygen evolution catalyst It is clearly seen from this equation that reduction of the
(OEC) are coated on the cathode and anode, respectively, to overpotentials by suitable methods is the central issue in order
speed the water splitting reaction. When driven by an external to make the water splitting reaction energy-efficient. Indeed,
voltage applied to the electrodes, water molecules are decom- Zother can be reduced by optimizing the design of the electrolytic
posed into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen can be stored cell, whereas Za and Zc have to be minimized by highly active
for fuel and the oxygen is released into the atmosphere. Thus, oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution catalysts, respectively.
the water splitting reaction can be divided into two half-reactions: In this context, the development of efficient water splitting
the water oxidation reaction (or oxygen evolution reaction) and catalysts, preferably based on sustainable and earth-abundant
5150 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
elements, is highly desirable in order to make the overall water- superficial geometric electrode area in the literature. In some
splitting more economical. Besides electrode materials, the cases, the currents we measured are also normalized to the
effective active area of electrode is another important factor in sample quality in order to achieve the activity per unit mass.
determining the reaction overpotential. The improvement of the To compare the activities between the samples, two special
effective active area of the electrode can be achieved by the overpotentials in HER are often provided deliberately. One is
optimization of the electrode preparation method (e.g., nano- the so-called ‘‘onset overpotential’’. The onset overpotential is
structuring). In addition, the bubble effect is also an issue that actually a poorly-defined term. If one wants to use this term in
cannot be ignored. During water electrolysis, lots of bubbles are the research paper, a suitable current density value (0.5–2 mA cm 2)
generated on the electrode surface and simultaneously some of should be clearly shown. The other relevant overpotential is that the
them do not get away from the electrode immediately. This electrocatalyst needs to yield a current density of 10 mA cm 2
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
directly leads to the loss of the effective active area, and thus the (which is the current density expected for a 12.3% efficient solar
increase of the reaction overpotential. water-splitting device).
The HER generally involves three possible reaction steps in
acidic media, while the HER mechanism in alkaline media is (ii) Tafel plot
still ambiguous. The first one in acidic media is the so-called Tafel plot depicts the dependence of steady-state current den-
Volmer step: H+ + e - Hads. The reaction of an electron with a sities on a variety of overpotentials. Generally, the overpotential
proton produces an adsorbed hydrogen atom (Hads) on the (Z) is logarithmically related to the current density ( j) and the
electrode surface. After generation of Hads, the hydrogen evolu- linear portion of the Tafel plot is fit to the Tafel equation:
tion reaction can proceed by the Tafel step (2Hads - H2) or the Z = a + b log j; where b is the Tafel slope. From the Tafel
Heyrovsky step (Hads + H+ + e - H2) or both. Regardless of the equation, we can derive two important parameters, Tafel slop
routes by which the HER occurs, Hads is always involved in (b) and exchange current density ( j0). b is generally related to
the HER. Thus, the free energy of hydrogen adsorption (DGH) is the catalytic mechanism of the electrode reaction, whereas j0,
widely accepted to be a descriptor for a hydrogen-evolving which is obtained when Z is assumed to be zero, describes
material. For example, DGH is approximately zero for Pt, and the intrinsic catalytic activity of the electrode material under
correspondingly Pt is the best solid-state hydrogen evolution equilibrium conditions. A catalytic material having a high j0
catalyst. If DGH is large and positive, the Hads is bound strongly and a small Tafel slop (b) is desirable actually.
with the electrode surface, making the initial Volmer step easy,
but the subsequent Tafel or Heyrovsky steps difficult. If DGH is (iii) Stability
large and negative, Hads has a weak interaction with the
Good structural and catalytic stabilities of a HER catalyst are of
electrode surface, resulting in a slow Volmer step that limits
crucial importance for a material that has some practical
the overall turnover rate. Therefore, an optimal non-Pt HER
applications potentially, especially considering that the HER
catalyst should also provide appropriate surface properties and
catalyst mostly works in a strongly reductive environment at the
have a nearly zero DGH.
pH extremes (pH 0 or 14). There are two methods for charac-
terizing the electrocatalytic stability of a HER catalyst. One
3. Experimental method for method is to measure the current variation with time (i.e., the
I–t curve). For this measurement, it would be better to set a
characterizing the electrochemical current density larger than 10 mA cm 2 for a long period of
activity of HER catalysts time (410 h). The other method is to conduct the recycling
experiment by performing CV or LSV. The number of cycles
To elucidate the catalytic activity of a given HER electrocatalyst,
should be larger than 5000 times to elucidate the stability of a
there are some important parameters that are required to be
material.
measured/calculated carefully. They mainly include total electrode
activity, Tafel plot, stability, Faradic efficiency, as well as turnover
(iv) Faradic efficiency
frequency.
Faradic efficiency describes the efficiency with which electrons
(i) Total electrode activity participate in a desired reaction in an electrochemical system.
The total electrode activity is generally estimated first by For the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction, Faradic
performing cyclic voltammetry (CV) or linear sweep voltam- efficiency is defined as the ratio of the experimentally detected
metry (LSV). Because non-Faradaic capacitive current may con- H2 amount to the theoretical H2 amount, which can be calcu-
stitute a certain portion of the total current we observed, lated from the current density based on a 100% Faradaic yield.
especially for those carbon-containing catalysts, we only get a
preliminary assessment of the material’s electrocatalytic activity (v) Turnover frequency
from the CV or LSV results. To more exactly determine the Turnover frequency (TOF) is defined as the number of reactant
catalytic activity of a material, we need to measure its steady- that a catalyst can convert to a desired product per catalytic site
state currents at various applied voltages with a dwell time of at per unit of time, which can exhibit the intrinsic activity of each
least 5 min. The obtained currents are usually normalized to the catalytic site. However, it is very difficult to get a precise TOF
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5151
View Article Online
this clearly does not give the exact value (gives an underesti-
mated value actually), it is sometimes done because of unavail-
Fig. 4 Elements that are used for constructing HER electrocatalysts.
ability of ways to completely determine all the accessible active
sites in the catalytic system. Despite being relatively imprecise
though, the latter may still give insights into the comparative
catalytic activity or efficiency of two or more materials if carefully
executed. For instance, in most cases, one can only get TOFs
calculated per unit mole of atoms present in the HER nano-
catalyst, despite it is very likely that only the surface atoms,
whose number may be hard to figure out precisely, may only be
responsible for the catalysis. This will obviously result in TOFs
that would be grossly underestimated compared with the real
TOF values of the active sites, because it is almost impossible
to have every atom in a material like nanoparticles to be
catalytically active or equally accessible. Nevertheless, when
similar materials are compared, such results could still be
relevant and useful. Fig. 5 Crustal abundance of metals that are used for constructing HER
electrocatalysts.
5152 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
5.1 Crystalline MoS2 conductibility engineering’’. The active site engineering mainly
5.1.1 Active sites of MoS2. The study of MoS2 on electro- includes three aspects: (i) increasing the number of exposed active
chemical HER can be traced to the 1970s,44 which showed that sites, (ii) enhancing the reactivity of active sites, and (iii) improving
bulk MoS2 crystals were non-reactive toward HER. As a result, the electrical contact to active sites. The electronic conductibility
MoS2 has not been considered as a promising hydrogen evolution engineering can be achieved by two ways: (i) doping suitable
electrocatalyst for a long time. This tide was totally reversed by heteroatoms into the lattice of MoS2 and (ii) coupling MoS2 with
Hinnemann et al. in 2005. They found that the (1010) Mo-edge conductive species, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene. In
structure in MoS2 had a close resemblance to the active site of some cases, the two aforesaid strategies have been integrated in a
nitrogenase.45 Furthermore, they showed that the computational single material system, either intentionally or unintentionally. In
free energy of atomic hydrogen bonding to the MoS2 edge was this section, we will summarize these achievements classified by
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
close to that of Pt (Fig. 6), raising the possibility of MoS2 as a different yet specific tactics.
promising HER electrocatalyst in theory. In their study, they
also prepared MoS2 nanoparticles supported on graphite, and
experimentally verified the catalytic activity of nanoscale MoS2 (i) Constructing active site-rich nanosheets. Compared with
for HER. This is the first time that the MoS2 edge structure is bulk materials, nanostructured materials usually have larger
considered to be the actual active site. To further identify the specific surface areas and higher density of surface reactive sites.
active sites of MoS2, Jaramillo et al. prepared different sizes of Thus, a convenient method to enhance the catalytic activity of
MoS2 nanoparticles with the predominance of the sulfide MoS2 towards HER is preparing them in a nanostructured form.
Mo-edges.46 Electrocatalytic activity measurements showed that With the aim of increasing the active sites of MoS2, some
the catalytic performance of MoS2 nanoparticles is related to methods have been developed by different groups to prepare
the edge state length, rather than the area coverage, directly its nanostructured counterpart.50–60 Because MoS2 possesses a
establishing the relationship between MoS2’s edges and the unique layered crystal structure, it shows a quite strong tendency
catalytic active sites. to form sheet-like nanocrystals. This is also why nanosheet
Homogeneous catalysts with precise molecular structures morphology dominates the whole MoS2 nanostructures.
usually have explicit definition and quantitation of the active Chemical exfoliation of bulk MoS2 by the lithium intercala-
sites relative to heterogeneous catalysts. Thus, it is a smart way tion method is widely used to obtain single- or few-layered
to employ appropriate molecular catalysts to imitate the possible MoS2 nanomaterials. This method typically includes an inter-
active sites of heterogeneous catalysts. Keep this in mind, three calation process of lithium compounds (e.g., n-butyllithium)
molecular catalysts, including [Mo3S4]4+, [(PY5Me2)MoS2]2+ and between MoS2 layers followed by a furious exfoliation of Li-
[Mo3S13]2 , which mimic the structure of triangular active edge intercalated compounds via reacting with water. Interestingly,
sites in MoS2, have been prepared by different groups (PY5Me2 = chemically-exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets exhibit an unexpected
2,6-bis(1,1-bis(2-pyridyl)ethyl)pyridine).47–49 The expected electro- phase transformation from the thermodynamically favored 2H
catalytic activities of these discrete molecular units verified again phase to the metastable 1T polymorph partially (Fig. 7).55 The
the active site of nanoscale MoS2 from a different perspective. structure of the 2H phase can be described by two S–Mo–S
5.1.2 Strategies for improving the catalytic activity of MoS2. layers composed of edge-shared MoS6 trigonal prisms, whereas
Based on the instructional studies on active sites, as stated the structure of the 1T phase is described by a single S–Mo–S
above, and the semiconductive nature of MoS2, researchers have layer built from edge-sharing MoS6 octahedra. In 2013, Jin’s
conducted some rational designs on nanoscale MoS2 catalysts for group first demonstrated that the 1T polymorph of MoS2 had
improving their catalytic activity. The strategies can be roughly higher metallic character and more competitive HER activities
divided into the categories ‘‘active site engineering’’ and ‘‘electronic than the 2H phase because of the better electrical conductivity
of the former.56 Chhowalla’s group further found that the active
sites of 1T MoS2, different from the ones limited by the edges
of the 2H phase, mainly located in the basal plane.57 Thus,
the authors proposed that the enhanced catalytic activity of 1T
MoS2 was attributed to both the increase of active sites and the
improvement of conductivity. Furthermore, Pumera’s group
investigated the effects of lithium intercalation compounds
on the degrees of exfoliation and the catalytic activity of exfoliated
MoS2 nanomaterials.58 Their results showed that the MoS2
nanosheets, which were produced using n-butyllithium and
tert-butyllithium as the intercalator, exhibited higher degrees
of exfoliation and better catalytic properties than that obtained
with methyllithium. The catalytic activities of the exfoliated
Fig. 6 Calculated free energy diagram for hydrogen evolution relative to
MoS2 can be further enhanced by a simple electrochemical
the standard hydrogen electrode at pH 0.45 Reprinted with permission pretreatment.59 The electrochemical activation process might
from ref. 45. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. lead to the 2H–1T transition, as confirmed by DFT calculations.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5153
View Article Online
5154 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5155
View Article Online
5156 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5157
View Article Online
5158 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
were effective promoters. At pH 7, Co2+ as the best promoter exhibited a small Tafel slope of 29 mV dec 1, and comparable
gave MoSx a 5-fold increase in the current density at Z = 200 mV. activity to that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst (Fig. 20).
At pH 0, the best promoter was Fe2+, which gave a 2-fold
increase in the current density at the same overpotential. This
5.3 Tungsten disulfide
group also found that Fe, Co, and Ni ions promoted the growth
of the MoSx films, resulting in larger surface area, higher Owing to its structural and electronic similarities to MoS2, WS2
catalyst loading and thus better catalytic activity. has also drawn substantial interest in recent years. To realize its
To further enhance the performance of MoSx, coupling it potential application in HER, nanostructured WS2 with well-
with conductive substrates is a viable method.103–108 To date, controlled structures and tunable properties are required.
conducting nanocarbons, nanoporous gold and Ni foam were Recent research studies in this area have already led to some
successful examples of such WS2 nanomaterials.114–119 One of
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
Fig. 21 (a) Typical AFM image of exfoliated nanosheets of WS2. Scale bar,
500 nm. (b) High-resolution STEM images of an as-exfoliated WS2 mono-
layer showing regions exhibiting the 1T superlattice. The inset in b shows
the strain tensor map generated from the STEM-HAADF image using peak
Fig. 20 Polarization curves of electrodes modified with: (a) PPy, (b) MoSx, pair analysis. Light (yellow) and dark (black) colours correspond to regions
(c) (NH4)2MoS4, (d) PPy/MoSx, and (e) Pt/C.113 Copyright 2014 WILEY-VCH where the strain is in tension and compression, respectively. Scale bars,
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim. 1 nm.114 Copyright 2014 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5159
View Article Online
5160 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
6.1 Mo and W selenides Fig. 25 (a) Crystal structure of the layered hexagonal MoSe2 phase. The
Mo atom and Se atom are displayed in grey and yellow, respectively. (b)
Lately, research on Mo or W selenides has attracted consider-
Reaction equation for hierarchical ultrathin MoSe2 x nanosheets. (c) Sche-
able attention and there are some interesting results in this matic illustration of the formation process of hierarltrahin MoSe2 x
area.127–134 Yang’s group reported a simple and fast bottom-up nanosheets by a bottom-up colloidal synthetic route.127 Reproduced by
route to make hierarchical MoSe2 x (x E 0.47) nanosheets permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5161
View Article Online
5162 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
7. Metal carbides
In 1973, R. B. Levy and M. Boudart discovered that tungsten
carbide possessed some platinum-like catalytic behaviors because
of its similar d-band electronic density states to platinum.143,144
This pioneering work immediately evoked great interest among
chemical researchers, and simultaneously great enthusiasm was
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5163
View Article Online
MoC2–carbon nanotube composite by in situ carburization of carbide was demonstrated to be an excellent substrate to support
ammonium molybdate on carbon nanotubes without using noble metal catalysts (e.g., Pt), the development of pristine
other carbon sources.149 The as-prepared composite catalyst tungsten carbide as a high-performance catalyst is more
showed superior electrocatalytic activity and stability toward appealing due to the avoidance of noble metals. Wirth et al.
HER compared to the bulk Mo2C. In addition, MoC2–graphene systematically investigated a series of commercial IVB–VIB
and MoC2–nanocarbon–nanotubes were also prepared by two transition metal carbides for HER in an acid solution, and
different groups.150,151 It is worth noting that in the MoC2– among them, tungsten carbide exhibited the best catalytic
nanocarbon–nanotubes ternary composite material, the carbon activity, even better than molybdenum carbide (Fig. 30).155 This
nanotube–graphene hybrid support was believed to play multi- is really a good news for tungsten carbide. However, the
ple roles in avoiding aggregation of nanocrystals, providing a performance of tungsten carbide still needs to be further
large contact area with the electrolyte, facilitating the electron optimized in terms of both activity and stability.
transfer, and thus enhancing the catalytic activity of Mo2C. Tungsten carbide is typically synthesized in a carbon-rich
Furthermore, graphitic carbon nitride was used as a highly reaction system. This often leads to the as-obtained tungsten
active carbon source for the synthesis of the Mo2C/carbon HER carbide material having some additional surface carbons. These
catalyst.152 In particular, Alhajri et al. prepared this material via surface carbons usually have adverse effects on the catalytic
a thermally-driven reaction of a molybdenum precursor with properties of materials because they can block the direct inter-
mesoporous C3N4 under an inert atmosphere. The confinement action between the reactants and the WC surface. Chen’s group
effect of mesopores gave rise to the final material with a small recently reported an atomic oxygen pretreatment method to
particle size (8 nm) and a large surface area (308 m2 g 1). remove the carbon on the surface of WC to a certain extent.156
Biomass, such as soybean and sodium alginate, was recently The atomic oxygens were generated in an oxygen plasma source.
considered as ‘‘green’’ chemical agents for the preparation of This pretreatment was proven to improve the catalytic activity for
Mo2C-based nanocatalysts. Chen et al. reported the synthesis of HER. In another study, Hunt et al. presented a very smart
b-Mo2C and g-Mo2N nanocomposite catalysts via the solid-state method for the preparation of surface-exposed tungsten carbide
reaction between soybeans and ammonium molybdate (Fig. 29).153 nanocatalysts 1–4 nm in size (Fig. 31).157 The key steps for
Their experimental results demonstrated that b-Mo2C was the the synthesis to be successful are: (i) the synthesis of WOx
catalytically active phase and g-Mo2N was the acid-proof phase. nanoparticles encapsulated within the SiO2 matrix; (ii) high-
The hybridization of b-Mo2C and g-Mo2N resulted in the high temperature carburization treatment; (iii) removal of the SiO2
catalytic activity and durability of the material. The activity of shell and anchoring tungsten carbide nanoparticles on a high-
the composite catalyst could be further enhanced by coupling surface-area carbon support.
graphene. In the other study, Cui et al. presented the synthesis Very recently, Garcia-Esparza et al. reported the synthesis of
of Mo2C nanoparticles on graphitic carbon sheets using a carbon-coated tungsten carbide nanocrystals (B5 nm) through
biopolymer, sodium alginate, as the carbon source.154 The the reaction of tungsten precursors with mesoporous graphitic
biomass-assisted synthesis provides us a novel methodology C3N4 as the reactive template.158 Unexpectedly, this material
for low-cost, scaled-up synthesis of noble metal-free water exhibited very high catalytic activity and stability for HER over a
splitting catalysts. wide pH range. It is worth noting that tungsten carbide,
generally, has a poor stability in neutral and basic media.159–162
7.2 Tungsten carbide Thus, this result might indicate the importance of additional
Tungsten carbide, one of the most important metal carbides, carbon on the surface of tungsten carbide. In addition, the most
was first found to have Pt-like catalytic properties. While tungsten incomprehensible thing is how a carbon-coated material could
5164 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5165
View Article Online
the strong interaction between Ni and Mo in the bimetallic observed that the surfaces of the atomically-thin MoN nanosheets
nitride structure. Accordingly, this NiMoNx catalyst exhibited were wholly comprised of apical Mo atoms, and the surface Mo
an excellent activity for the HER with a small overpotential of atoms could act as the active sites for catalyzing protons into
78 mV and a Tafel slope as small as 35 mV dec 1. And the hydrogen. Therefore, the rich active surface sites, together with the
material could maintain the structure and catalytic activity in better conductivity, made the MoN nanosheets achieve a high
acidic media, affording strong evidence for the stabilizing current density of 38.5 mA cm 2 at Z = 300 mV. In another study, a
effect of nitridation. tungsten nitride nanorod array was first synthesized by Sun et al.,
In another significant work, Cao et al. successfully prepared and it could serve as an all-pH efficient and durable HER catalyst
a cobalt molybdenum nitride (Co0.6Mo1.4N2) via annealing a with an overpotential of 198 mV to achieve a current density of
Co3Mo3N precursor under flowing NH3 at 400 1C for 1 h.188 This 10 mA cm 2.190
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
5166 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5167
View Article Online
Fig. 37 (a) XRD patterns of the Co(OH)2 precursor and CoP. (b) Low- and
(inset) high-magnification SEM images of Co(OH)2/CC. (c) Low- and (inset)
high-magnification SEM images of CoP/CC. TEM images of (d) Co(OH)2
and (e) CoP nanowire. (f) HRTEM image of the CoP nanowire. (g) STEM
image and EDX elemental mapping of P and Co for the CoP nanowire.202
Reprinted with permission from ref. 202. Copyright 2014 American
Chemical Society.
5168 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5169
View Article Online
5170 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5171
View Article Online
Fig. 44 (a) The rate of H2 evolution on CdS loaded with 0.2 wt% of different
cocatalysts. (b) The HRTEM image of the MoS2/CdS catalyst.230 Reprinted with Fig. 45 Activity comparison of different photocatalysts. NiS/CdS**: reac-
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
permission from ref. 232. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. tion was conducted in Na2S (0.25 M) and Na2SO3 (0.35 M) solution, and
NiS + CdS*: physical mixture of CdS and NiS.254 Reproduced by permission
of The Royal Society of Chemistry.
in CdS under visible light irradiation. The photogenerated
electrons would transfer from CdS to MoS2 at their interface,
while the photogenerated holes remained in CdS. As a result, production systems.254–263 For example, Xu’s group demon-
the lifetime of photogenerated charges in the MoS2/CdS photo- strated the positive effect of the NiS cocatalyst on the CdS
catalyst increased significantly, finally leading to the enhance- photocatalyst for the first time.254 They prepared NiS/CdS
ment of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on CdS. In addition, photocatalysts via a hydrothermal loading method by precipi-
MoS2 was considered by the authors to be the reactive sites tating nickel acetate in the presence of thiourea, and then
in the composite catalyst. The same group further verified that studied their photocatalytic activities using lactic acid as the
WS2 had a similar function to MoS2 for enhancing the photo- sacrificial reagent under visible light. The NiS/CdS photocatalyst with
catalytic activity of CdS.234 After Li’s work, there were several the optimized NiS amount of 1.2 mol% gave a hydrogen production
reports on new methods to synthesize MoS2/CdS nanostruc- rate of 2.18 mmol h 1, which was about 35 times as high as that
tures with different morphologies,235–240 as well as extension obtained on pristine CdS (see Fig. 45). The quantum efficiency was
of MoS2 cocatalysts to other semiconductor photocatalysis as high as 51.3% at 420 nm. Subsequently, the authors extended the
systems, ZnS,241 ZnxCd1 xS,242,243 CdSe,244 ZnIn2S4,245–247 NiS cocatalyst into the g-C3N4 system.255 g-C3N4 is an organic metal-
TiO2,248 Cu2O,249 niobate250 and g-C3N4.251,252 free semiconductor material, and Pt as the cocatalyst was previously
In another important work,253 amorphous MoS3 clusters used to enhance its catalytic activity. Xu et al. found that the optimal
were explored for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of semi- loading amount of NiS on g-C3N4 is about 1.1 wt%,
conductor materials. Tang et al. grew amorphous MoS3 clusters and this NiS/g-C3N4 material gave a hydrogen evolution rate
on a CdSe-seeded CdS (CdSe/CdS) nanorod material via a of 48.2 mmol h 1 under visible irradiation in aqueous triethanol-
microwave heating reaction. The CdSe/CdS heterostructure amine solution. The optimal catalytic activity was about 250 times
was prepared for the purpose of controlling the separation higher than that of native g-C3N4.
of photogenerated holes and electrons. This unique nano- Apart from metal sulfides, metal carbide and phosphide
structure could ensure that the hole preferred to localize in electrocatalysts have been proven to be effective cocatalysts for
the CdSe seed, whilst the electron was largely delocalized. photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.158,212 For example, tungsten
These CdSe/CdS nanorods showed negligible rates of photo- carbide (WC) nanoparticles were demonstrated by Garcia-Esparza
catalytic H2 production, whereas deposition of amorphous et al. to function a cocatalyst for Na-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst
MoS3 resulted in a photochemically active system for hydrogen (STO:Na).158 WC-loaded STO:Na gave H2 and O2 in a stoichiometric
generation. In the MoS3-containing photocatalytic system, a ratio from water splitting (i.e., overall water splitting), whereas
hydrogen production rate of 100 mmol h 1 g 1 of was obtained, STO:Na only afforded a low hydrogen evolution rate without the
with an apparent quantum efficiency of 10% at l = 450 nm. O2 product. Based on the authors’ studies, the roles of the WC
Interestingly, the author found that all the samples underwent cocatalyst can be summarized as follow: (i) improving charge
a 30–50 min induction period before hydrogen generation separation, (ii) serving as the hydrogen-evolution active site,
started, indicating that activation of amorphous MoS3 species (iii) preventing the back reaction, H2 + O2 - H2O. In addition,
occurred during the photocatalytic progress. Based on XPS, Ni2P and FeP nanoparticles have been used for enhancing the
XANES, and EXAFS results, the authors claimed that the initial photocatalytic activities of CdS and TiO2, respectively.212,262
MoS3 precatalyst was photoreduced to form an under-coordinated
species structurally similar to MoS3 during the induction period,
and this reduced form of MoS3 was an active phase for hydrogen 12. Photoelectrochemical water
generation. This transformation was similar to the eletrocatalytic splitting with HER electrocatalysts
reduction of amorphous MoS3, which also in situ transformed as cocatalysts
MoS2+x species as the real active catalyst.
Ni, Co sulfides, which are good electrocatalysts for HER, Photoelectrochemical water splitting is a main research area in
have also been used to establish Pt-free photocatalytic hydrogen so-called artificial photosynthesis, and has been suggested as a
5172 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5173
View Article Online
5174 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5175
View Article Online
53 V. W. Lau, A. F. Masters, A. M. Bond and T. Maschmeyer, 77 X.-J. Lv, G.-W. She, S.-X. Zhou and Y.-M. Li, RSC Adv., 2013,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18, 8230–8239. 3, 21231–21236.
54 D. Wang, Z. Pan, Z. Wu, Z. Wang and Z. Liu, J. Power 78 X. Sun, J. Dai, Y. Guo, C. Wu, F. Hu, J. Zhao, X. Zeng and
Sources, 2014, 264, 229–234. Y. Xie, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 8359–8367.
55 J. D. Benck, T. R. Hellstern, J. Kibsgaard, P. Chakthranont 79 H. Wang, Z. Lu, S. Xu, D. Kong, J. J. Cha, G. Zheng, P.-C.
and T. F. Jaramillo, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 3957–3971. Hsu, K. Yan, D. Bradshaw, F. B. Prinz and Y. Cui, Proc. Natl.
56 M. A. Lukowski, A. S. Daniel, F. Meng, A. Forticaux, L. Li Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, 110, 19701–19706.
and S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 10274–10277. 80 J. Xie, J. Zhang, S. Li, F. Grote, X. Zhang, H. Zhang,
57 D. Voiry, M. Salehi, R. Silva, T. Fujita, M. Chen, T. Asefa, R. Wang, Y. Lei, B. Pan and Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
V. B. Shenoy, G. Eda and M. Chhowalla, Nano Lett., 2013, 2013, 135, 17881–17888.
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
13, 6222–6227. 81 W. Zhou, D. Hou, Y. Sang, S. Yao, J. Zhou, G. Li, L. Li, H. Liu
58 A. Ambrosi, Z. Sofer and M. Pumera, Small, 2015, 11, and S. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 11358–11364.
605–612. 82 Y. Li, H. Wang, L. Xie, Y. Liang, G. Hong and H. Dai, J. Am.
59 X. Chia, A. Ambrosi, D. Sedmidubsky, Z. Sofer and Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 7296–7299.
M. Pumera, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 1–8. 83 X. Zheng, J. Xu, K. Yan, H. Wang, Z. Wang and S. Yang,
60 Z. Wu, B. Fang, Z. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Liu, F. Liu, W. Wang, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 2344–2353.
A. Alfantazi, D. Wang and D. P. Wilkinson, ACS Catal., 84 E. G. S. Firmiano, M. A. L. Cordeiro, A. C. Rabelo, C. J.
2013, 3, 2101–2107. Dalmaschio, A. N. Pinheiro, E. C. Pereira and E. R. Leite,
61 D. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Wang, P. Zhou, Z. Wu and Z. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7687–7689.
Electrochem. Commun., 2013, 34, 219–222. 85 Y. Yan, B. Xia, X. Qi, H. Wang, R. Xu, J.-Y. Wang, H. Zhang
62 D. Gopalakrishnan, D. Damien and M. M. Shaijumon, and X. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4884–4886.
ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5297–6303. 86 Y. Yan, X. Ge, Z. Liu, J.-Y. Wang, J.-M. Lee and X. Wang,
63 J. Xie, H. Zhang, S. Li, R. Wang, X. Sun, M. Zhou, J. Zhou, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 7768–7771.
X. W. Lou and Y. Xie, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 5807–5813. 87 J. Deng, W. Yuan, P. Ren, Y. Wang, D. Deng, Z. Zhang and
64 Y. Yan, B. Y. Xia, X. Ge, Z. Liu and J.-Y. Wang, ACS Appl. X. Bao, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 34733–34738.
Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 12794–12798. 88 H. Zhu, M. Du, M. Zhang, M. Zou, T. Yang, Y. Fu and
65 D. Y. Chung, S.-K. Park, Y.-H. Chung, S.-H. Yu, D.-H. Lim, J. Yao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 7680–7685.
N. Jung, H. C. Ham, H.-Y. Park, Y. Piao, S. J. Yoo and Y.- 89 D. H. Youn, S. Han, J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Kim, H. Park, S. H. Choi
E. Sung, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 2131–2136. and J. S. Lee, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5164–5173.
66 Z. Lu, W. Zhu, X. Yu, H. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Sun, X. Wang, 90 L. Liao, J. Zhu, X. Bian, L. Zhu, M. D. Scanlon, H. H. Girault
H. Wang, J. Wang, J. Luo, X. Lei and L. Jiang, Adv. Mater., and B. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23, 5326–5333.
2014, 26, 2683–2687. 91 X. Bian, J. Zhu, L. Liao, M. D. Scanlon, P. Ge, C. Ji,
67 Y. Yu, S.-Y. Huang, Y. Li, S. N. Steinmann, W. Yang and H. H. Girault and B. Liu, Electrochem. Commun., 2012, 22,
L. Cao, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 553–558. 128–132.
68 J. Shi, D. Ma, G.-F. Han, Y. Zhang, Q. Ji, T. Gao, J. Sun, 92 Y. Hou, B. Zhang, Z. Wen, S. Cui, X. Guo, Z. He and J. Chen,
X. Song, C. Li, Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Lang, Y. Zhang and Z. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 13795–13800.
ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 10196–10204. 93 C.-B. Ma, X. Qi, B. Chen, S. Bao, Z. Yin, X.-J. Wu, Z. Luo,
69 Y. Zhang, Q. Ji, G.-F. Han, J. Ju, J. Shi, D. Ma, J. Sun, J. Wei, H.-L. Zhang and H. Zhang, Nanoscale, 2014, 6,
Y. Zhang, M. Li, X.-Y. Lang, Y. Zhang and Z. Liu, ACS Nano, 5624–5629.
2014, 8, 8617–8624. 94 Y. Yan, B. Xia, N. Li, Z. Xu, A. Fisher and X. Wang, J. Mater.
70 J. Kibsgaard, Z. Chen, B. N. Reinecke and T. F. Jaramillo, Chem. A, 2015, 3, 131–135.
Nat. Mater., 2012, 11, 963–969. 95 H. Wang, Z. Lu, D. Kong, J. Sun, T. M. Hymel and Y. Cui,
71 Z. Chen, D. Cummins, B. N. Reinecke, E. Clark, M. K. Sunkara ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 4940–4947.
and T. F. Jaramillo, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 4168–4175. 96 (a) D. Merki, S. Fierro, H. Vrubel and X. Hu, Chem. Sci.,
72 Y. Tan, P. Liu, L. Chen, W. Cong, Y. Ito, J. Han, X. Guo, 2011, 2, 1262–1267; (b) C. G. Morales-Guio and X. Hu, Acc.
Z. Tang, T. Fujita, A. Hirata and M. W. Chen, Adv. Mater., Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 2671–2681.
2014, 26, 8023–8028. 97 H. Vrubel and X. Hu, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 2002–2011.
73 Z. Lu, H. Zhang, W. Zhu, X. Yu, Y. Kuang, Z. Chang, X. Lei 98 S. Murugesan, A. Akkineni, B. P. Chou, M. S. Glaz,
and X. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7516–7518. D. A. V. Bout and K. J. Stevenson, ACS Nano, 2013, 7,
74 Y. Yang, H. Fei, G. Ruan, C. Xiang and J. M. Tour, Adv. 8199–8205.
Mater., 2014, 26, 8163–8168. 99 H. Vrubel, D. Merki and X. Hu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5,
75 J. Bonde, P. G. Moses, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Norskov and 6136–6144.
I. Chorkendorff, Faraday Discuss., 2008, 140, 219–231. 100 J. D. Benck, Z. Chen, L. Y. Kuritzky, A. J. Forman and
76 K. Zhang, H.-J. Kim, J.-T. Lee, G.-W. Chang, X. Shi, W. Kim, T. F. Jaramillo, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1916–1923.
M. Ma, K.-J. Kong, J.-M. Choi, M.-S. Song and J. H. Park, 101 H. G. S. Casalongue, J. D. Benck, C. Tsai, R. K. B. Karlsson,
ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 2489–2495. S. Kaya, M. L. Ng, L. G. M. Pettersson, F. A. Pedersen,
5176 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
J. K. Nørskov, H. Ogasawara, T. F. Jaramillo and A. Nilsson, 123 M. S. Faber, M. A. Lukowski, Q. Ding, N. S. Kaiser and
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 29252–29259. S. Jin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 21347–21356.
102 D. Merki, H. Vrubel, L. Rovelli, S. Fierro and X. Hu, Chem. 124 M. S. Faber, R. Dziedzic, M. A. Lukowski, N. S. Kaiser,
Sci., 2012, 3, 2515–2525. Q. Ding and S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136,
103 D. J. Li, U. N. Maiti, J. Lim, D. S. Choi, W. J. Lee, Y. Oh, 10053–10061.
G. Y. Lee and S. O. Kim, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 1228–1233. 125 S. Peng, L. Li, X. Han, W. Sun, M. Srinivasan, S. G. Mhaisalkar,
104 A. B. Laursen, P. C. K. Vesborg and I. Chorkendorff, Chem. F. Cheng, Q. Yan, J. Chen and S. Ramakrishna, Angew. Chem.,
Commun., 2013, 49, 4965–4967. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12594–12599.
105 H. Vrubel, T. Moehl, M. Grätzel and X. Hu, Chem. Com- 126 Y. Sun, C. Liu, D. C. Grauer, J. Yano, J. R. Long, P. Yang and
mun., 2013, 49, 8985–8987. C. J. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 17699–17702.
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
106 S. Chen, J. Duan, Y. Tang, B. Jin and S. Z. Qiao, Nano 127 X. Zou, J. Jiang, T. Ding, J. Zhang, B. Pan, J. Zuo and
Energy, 2015, 11, 11–18. Q. Yang, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 11046–11051.
107 Z. Pu, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri, A. Y. Obaid and X. Sun, J. Power 128 F. H. Saadi, A. I. Carim, J. M. Velazquez, J. H. Baricuatro,
Sources, 2014, 263, 181–185. C. C. L. McCrory, M. P. Soriaga and N. S. Lewis, ACS Catal.,
108 X. Ge, L. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Wen, A. Hirata and M. Chen, 2014, 4, 2866–2873.
Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 3100–3104. 129 D. Kong, H. Wang, J. J. Cha, M. Pasta, K. J. Koski, J. Yao
109 Y.-H. Chang, C.-T. Lin, T.-Y. Chen, C.-L. Hsu, Y.-H. Lee, and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 1341–1347.
W. Zhang, K.-H. Wei and L.-J. Li, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 130 H. Wang, D. Kong, P. Johanes, J. J. Cha, G. Zheng, K. Yan,
756–760. N. Liu and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 3426–3433.
110 Y.-H. Chang, F.-Y. Wu, T.-Y. Chen, C.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Chen, 131 S. Mao, Z. Wen, S. Ci, X. Guo, K. Ostrikov and J. Chen,
F. Wiryo, K.-H. Wei, C.-Y. Chiang and L.-J. Li, Small, 2014, Small, 2014, 11, 414–419.
10, 895–900. 132 J. M. Velazquez, F. H. Saadi, A. P. Pieterick, J. M. Spurgeon,
111 Y.-H. Chang, R. D. Nikam, C.-T. Lin, J.-K. Huang, C.-C. M. P. Soriaga, B. S. Brunschwig and N. S. Lewis, J. Electroanal.
Tseng, C.-L. Hsu, C.-C. Cheng, C.-Y. Su, L.-J. Li and Chem., 2014, 716, 45–48.
D. H. C. Chua, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 133 L. Jia, X. Sun, Y. Jiang, S. Yu and C. Wang, Adv. Funct.
17679–17685. Mater., 2015, 25, 1814–1820.
112 T. Wang, L. Liu, Z. Zhu, P. Papakonstantinou, J. Hu, H. Liu 134 C. Tsai, K. Chan, F. A. Pedersen and J. K. Nørskov, Phys.
and M. Li, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 625–633. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 13156–13164.
113 T. Wang, J. Zhuo, K. Du, B. Chen, Z. Zhu, Y. Shao and 135 M.-R. Gao, Z.-Y. Lin, T.-T. Zhuang, J. Jiang, Y.-F. Xu,
M. Li, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 3761–3766. Y.-R. Zheng and S.-H. Yu, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22,
114 D. Voiry, H. Yamaguchi, J. Li, R. Silva, D. C. B. Alves, 13662–13668.
T. Fujita, M. Chen, T. Asefa, V. B. Shenoy, G. Eda and 136 D. Kong, H. Wang, Z. Lu and Y. Cui, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
M. Chhowalla, Nat. Mater., 2013, 12, 850–855. 2014, 136, 4897–4900.
115 J. Yang, D. Voiry, S. J. Ahn, D. Kang, A. Y. Kim, 137 A. I. Carim, F. H. Saadi, M. P. Soriaga and N. S. Lewis,
M. Chhowalla and H. S. Shin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 13835–13839.
2013, 52, 13751–13754. 138 Q. Liu, J. Shi, J. Hu, A. M. Asiri, Y. Luo and X. Sun,
116 L. Cheng, W. Huang, Q. Gong, C. Liu, Z. Liu, Y. Li and ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 3877–3881.
H. Dai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 7860–7863. 139 Y.-F. Xu, M.-R. Gao, Y.-R. Zheng, J. Jiang and S.-H. Yu,
117 C. L. Choi, J. Feng, Y. Li, J. Wu, A. Zak, R. Tenne and Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 8546–8550.
H. Dai, Nano Res., 2013, 6, 921–928. 140 V. Kiran, D. Mukherjee, R. N. Jenjeti and S. Sampath,
118 (a) Z. Wu, B. Fang, A. Bonakdarpour, A. Sun, D. P. Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 12856–12863.
Wilkinson and D. Wang, Appl. Catal., B, 2012, 125, 141 K. Xu, F. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Zhan, Q. Wang, Z. Cheng,
59–66; (b) Z. Pu, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri, A. Y. Obaid and M. Safdar and J. He, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 8468–8476.
X. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 134, 8–12. 142 C. Xu, S. Peng, C. Tan, H. Ang, H. Tan, H. Zhang and
119 P. D. Tran, S. Y. Chiam, P. P. Boix, Y. Ren, S. S. Pramana, Q. Yan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 5597–5601.
J. Fize, V. Artero and J. Barber, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 143 R. B. Levy and M. Boudart, Science, 1973, 181, 547–549.
2452–2459. 144 R. L. Montgomery, Science, 1974, 184, 563–565.
120 C. D. Giovanni, W.-A. Wang, S. Nowak, J.-M. Grenèche, 145 H. Vrubel and X. Hu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51,
H. Lecoq, L. Mouton, M. Giraud and C. Tard, ACS Catal., 12703–12706.
2014, 4, 681–687. 146 C. Wan, Y. N. Regmi and B. M. Leonard, Angew. Chem., Int.
121 D. Kong, J. J. Cha, H. Wang, H. R. Lee and Y. Cui, Energy Ed., 2014, 53, 6407–6410.
Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3553–3558. 147 L. Liao, S. Wang, J. Xiao, X. Bian, Y. Zhang, M. D. Scanlon,
122 (a) C. Tang, Z. Pu, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Electro- X. Hu, Y. Tang, B. Liu and H. H. Girault, Energy Environ.
chim. Acta, 2015, 153, 508–514; (b) W. Cui, C. Ge, Z. Xing, Sci., 2014, 7, 387–392.
A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 137, 148 P. Xiao, Y. Yan, X. Ge, Z. Liu, J.-Y. Wang and X. Wang, Appl.
504–510. Catal., B, 2014, 154, 232–237.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5177
View Article Online
149 W.-F. Chen, C.-H. Wang, K. Sasaki, N. Marinkovic, W. Xu, 174 T. G. Kelly, S. T. Hunt, D. V. Esposito and J. G. Chen,
J. T. Muckerman, Y. Zhu and R. R. Adzic, Energy Environ. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 5638–5644.
Sci., 2013, 6, 943–951. 175 I. J. Hsu, Y. C. Kimmel, X. Jiang, B. G. Willis and J. G. Chen,
150 L. F. Pan, Y. H. Li, S. Yang, P. F. Liu, M. Q. Yu and Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1063–1065.
H. G. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 13135–13137. 176 D. J. Ham, R. Ganesan and J. S. Lee, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,
151 D. H. Youn, S. Han, J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Kim, H. Park, S. H. Choi 2008, 33, 6865–6872.
and J. S. Lee, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5164–5173. 177 Y. Liu and W. E. Mustain, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37,
152 N. S. Alhajri, D. H. Anjum and K. Takanabe, J. Mater. Chem. 8929–8938.
A, 2014, 2, 10548–10556. 178 C. Ma, J. Sheng, N. Brandon, C. Zhang and G. Li,
153 W.-F. Chen, S. Lyer, S. Lyer, K. Sasaki, C.-H. Wang, Y. Zhu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32, 2824–2829.
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
J. T. Muckerman and E. Fujita, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 179 M. Wu, P. K. Shen, Z. Wei, S. Song and M. Nie, J. Power
1818–1826. Sources, 2007, 166, 310–316.
154 W. Cui, N. Cheng, Q. Liu, C. Ge, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, 180 Y. Yan, L. Zhang, X. Qi, H. Song, J.-Y. Wang, H. Zhang and
ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2658–2661. X. Wang, Small, 2012, 8, 3350–3356.
155 S. Wirth, F. Harnisch, M. Weinmann and U. Schröder, 181 D. V. Esposito, S. T. Hunt, A. L. Stottlemyer, K. D. Dobson,
Appl. Catal., B, 2012, 126, 225–230. B. E. McCandless, R. W. Birkmire and J. G. Chen, Angew.
156 X. Yang, Y. C. Kimmel, J. Fu, B. E. Koel and J. G. Chen, Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9859–9862.
ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 765–769. 182 T. G. Kelly and J. G. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41,
157 S. T. Hunt, T. Nimmanwudipong and Y. Román-Leshkov, 8021–8034.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5131–5136. 183 S. Dong, X. Chen, X. Zhang and G. Cui, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
158 A. T. Garcia-Esparza, D. Cha, Y. Ou, J. Kubota, K. Domen 2013, 257, 1946–1956.
and K. Takanabe, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 168–181. 184 J. S. J. Hargreaves, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2013, 257, 2015–2031.
159 F. Harnisch, G. Sievers and U. Schröder, Appl. Catal., B, 185 D. J. Ham and J. S. Lee, Energies, 2009, 2, 873–899.
2009, 89, 455–458. 186 E. Furimsky, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 240, 1–28.
160 H. Zheng, J. Huang, W. Wang and C. Ma, Electrochem. 187 W.-F. Chen, K. Sasaki, C. Ma, A. I. Frenkel, N. Marinkovic,
Commun., 2005, 7, 1045–1049. J. T. Muckerman, Y. Zhu and R. R. Adzic, Angew. Chem., Int.
161 M. C. Weidman, D. V. Esposito, Y.-C. Hsu and J. G. Chen, Ed., 2012, 91, 6131–6135.
J. Power Sources, 2012, 202, 11–17. 188 B. Cao, G. M. Veith, J. C. Neuefeind, R. R. Adzic and
162 A. V. Nikiforov, I. M. Petrushina, E. Christensen, N. V. P. G. Khalifah, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 19186–19192.
Alexeev, A. V. Samokhin and N. J. Bjerrum, Int. J. Hydrogen 189 J. Xie, S. Li, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, R. Wang, H. Zhang, B. Pan
Energy, 2012, 37, 18591–18597. and Y. Xie, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 4615–4620.
163 Y. Zhao, K. Kamiya, K. Hashimoto and S. Nakanishi, 190 J. Shi, Z. Pu, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri, J. Hua and X. Sun,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 13638–13641. Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 154, 345–351.
164 W.-F. Chen, J. M. Schneider, K. Sasaki, C.-H. Wang, 191 P. Liu and J. A. Rodriguez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
J. Schneider, S. Lyer, S. Lyer, Y. Zhu, J. T. Muckerman 14871–14878.
and E. Fujita, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 2414–2418. 192 S. T. Oyama, T. Gott, H. Zhao and Y.-K. Lee, Catal. Today,
165 J. Zhang, X. Meng, J. Zhao and Z. Zhu, ChemCatChem, 2009, 143, 94–107.
2014, 6, 2059–2064. 193 E. J. Popczun, J. R. Mckone, C. G. Read, A. J. Biacchi,
166 R. Michalsky, Y.-J. Zhang and A. A. Peterson, ACS Catal., A. M. Wiltrout, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem.
2014, 4, 1274–1278. Soc., 2013, 135, 9267–9270.
167 C. Ge, P. Jiang, W. Cui, Z. Pu, Z. Xing, A. M. Asiri, 194 L. Feng, H. Vrubel, M. Bensimon and X. Hu, Phys. Chem.
A. Y. Obaid, X. Sun and J. Tian, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 5917–5921.
134, 182–186. 195 Z. Pu, Q. Liu, C. Tang, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Nanoscale,
168 Y. C. Kimmel, D. V. Esposito, R. W. Birkmire and J. G. 2014, 6, 11031–11034.
Chen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 3019–3024. 196 A. R. J. Kucernak and V. N. N. Sundaram, J. Mater. Chem. A,
169 D. D. V. Anićijević, V. M. Nikolić, M. P. Marčeta-Kaninski 2014, 2, 17435–17445.
and I. A. Pašti, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 197 Z. Huang, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, C. Lv, H. Meng and C. Zhang,
16071–16079. ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 8121–8129.
170 D. V. Esposito and J. G. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 198 P. Jiang, Q. Liu and X. Sun, Nanoscale, 2014, 6,
3900–3912. 13440–13445.
171 D. V. Esposito, S. T. Hunt, Y. C. Kimmel and J. G. Chen, 199 Z. Jin, P. Li, X. Huang, G. Zeng, Y. Jin, B. Zheng and
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 3025–3033. D. Xiao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 18593–18599.
172 T. G. Kelly, K. X. Lee and J. G. Chen, J. Power Sources, 2014, 200 E. J. Popczun, C. G. Read, C. W. Roske, N. S. Lewis and
271, 76–81. R. E. Schaak, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5427–5430.
173 D. D. Vasić, I. A. Pašti and S. V. Mentus, Int. J. Hydrogen 201 Q. Liu, J. Tian, W. Cui, P. Jiang, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and
Energy, 2013, 38, 5009–5018. X. Sun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6710–6714.
5178 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
View Article Online
202 J. Tian, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 226 Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, Y. Zhu, L. H. Li, Y. Han, Y. Chen, A. Du,
2014, 136, 7587–7590. M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3783.
203 Q. Li, Z. Xing, A. M. Asiri, P. Jiang and X. Sun, Int. 227 (a) X. Zou, X. Huang, A. Goswami, R. Silva, B. R. Sathe,
J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 16806–16811. E. Mikmerova and T. Asefa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014,
204 Z. Pu, Q. Liu, P. Jiang, A. M. Asiri, A. Y. Obaid and X. Sun, 53, 4372–4376; (b) S. Gao, G.-D. Li, Y. Liu, H. Chen,
Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 4326–4329. L.-L. Feng, Y. Wang, M. Yang, D. Wang, S. Wang and
205 S. Gu, H. Du, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun and C. M. Li, Phys. Chem. X. Zou, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 2306–2316.
Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 16909–16913. 228 J. Deng, P. Ren, D. Deng, L. Yu, F. Yang and X. Bao, Energy
206 H. Du, Q. Liu, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun and C. M. Li, Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 1919–1923.
J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 14812–14816. 229 W. Cui, Q. Liu, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Chem.
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
207 P. Jiang, Q. Liu, C. Ge, W. Cui, Z. Pu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Commun., 2014, 50, 9340–9342.
J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 14634–14640. 230 (a) J. Ran, J. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, Chem.
208 Z. Huang, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, C. Lv, M. G. Humphrey and Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7787–7812; (b) L. Liao, Q. Zhang, Z. Su,
C. Zhang, Nano Energy, 2014, 9, 373–382. Z. Zhao, Y. Wang, Y. Li, X. Lu, D. Wei, G. Feng, Q. Yu,
209 A. Lu, Y. Chen, H. Li, A. Dowd, M. B. Cortie, Q. Xie, H. Guo, X. Cai, J. Zhao, Z. Ren, H. Fang, F. Robles-Hernandez,
Q. Qi and D.-L. Peng, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, S. Baldelli and J. Bao, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2014, 9, 69–73;
18919–18928. (c) Y. Zhang, Y. Tang, X. Liu, Z. Dong, H. H. Hng, Z. Chen,
210 F. H. Saadi, A. I. Carim, E. Verlage, J. C. Hemminger, N. S. T. C. Sum and X. Chen, Small, 2013, 9, 996–1002; (d) J. Yu,
Lewis and M. P. Soriaga, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, S.-L. Lei, T.-C. Chen, J. Lan, J.-P. Zou, L.-H. Xin, S.-L.
29294–29300. Luo and C.-T. Au, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39,
211 Y. Xu, R. Wu, J. Zhang, Y. Shi and B. Zhang, Chem. 13105–13113; (e) J.-P. Zou, S.-L. Lei, J. Yu, S.-L. Luo, X.-B.
Commun., 2013, 49, 6656–6658. Luo, X.-H. Tang, W.-L. Dai, J. Sun, G.-C. Guo and C.-T. Au,
212 J. F. Callejas, J. M. McEnaney, C. G. Read, J. C. Crompton, Appl. Catal., B, 2014, 150–151, 466–471; ( f ) S.-L. Lei, J. Yu,
A. J. Biacchi, E. J. Popczun, T. R. Gordon, N. S. Lewis and S.-K. Bao, G. Zeng, H.-L. Liu, D.-D. Wu, X.-H. Tang,
R. E. Schaak, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 11101–11107. J.-P. Zou and C.-T. Au, Appl. Catal., A, 2015, 493, 58–67.
213 P. Jiang, Q. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Tian, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, 231 A. Kudo and Y. Miseki, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 253–278.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1–6. 232 X. Zong, H. Yan, G. Wu, G. Ma, F. Wen, L. Wang and C. Li,
214 Y. Liang, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun and Y. Luo, ACS Catal., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7176–7177.
2014, 4, 4065–4069. 233 X. Zong, G. Wu, H. Yan, G. Ma, J. Shi, F. Wen, L. Wang and
215 Z. Zhang, B. Lu, J. Hao, W. Yang and J. Tang, Chem. C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 1963–1968.
Commun., 2014, 50, 11554–11557. 234 X. Zong, J. Han, G. Ma, H. Yan, G. Wu and C. Li, J. Phys.
216 J. Tian, Q. Liu, Y. Liang, Z. Xing, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, ACS Chem. C, 2011, 115, 12202–12208.
Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 20579–20584. 235 J. Zhang, Z. Zhu and X. Feng, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20,
217 J. Tian, Q. Liu, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Angew. 10632–10635.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9577–9581. 236 G. Chen, D. Li, F. Li, Y. Fan, H. Zhao, Y. Luo, R. Yu and
218 P. Xiao, M. A. Sk, L. Thia, X. Ge, R. J. Lim, J.-Y. Wang, K. H. Q. Meng, Appl. Catal., A, 2012, 443–444, 138–144.
Lim and X. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 2624–2629. 237 K. Chang, Z. Mei, T. Wang, Q. Kang, S. Ouang and J. Ye,
219 Z. Xing, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Adv. Mater., 2014, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 7078–7087.
26, 5702–5707. 238 Y. Li, H. Wang and S. Peng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118,
220 W. Cui, Q. Liu, Z. Xing, A. M. Asiri, K. A. Alamry and X. Sun, 19842–19848.
Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 164, 144–150. 239 L. Yang, D. Zhong, J. Zhang, Z. Yan, S. Ge, P. Du, J. Jiang,
221 J. Kibsgaard and T. F. Jaramillo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., D. Sun, X. Wu, Z. Fan, S. A. Dayeh and B. Xiang, ACS Nano,
2014, 53, 1–6. 2014, 8, 6979–6985.
222 J. M. McEnaney, J. C. Crompton, J. F. Callejas, 240 M. Liu, F. Li, Z. Sun, L. Ma, L. Xu and Y. Wang, Chem.
E. J. Popczun, A. J. Biacchi, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, Commun., 2014, 50, 11004–11007.
Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 4826–4831. 241 B. Zhu, B. Lin, Y. Zhou, P. Sun, Q. Yao, Y. Chen and B. Gao,
223 (a) J. M. McEnaney, J. C. Crompton, J. F. Callejas, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 3819–3827.
E. J. Popczun, C. G. Read, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, 242 M. Nguyen, P. D. Tran, S. S. Pramana, R. L. Lee, S. K.
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 11026–11028; (b) Z. Pu, Q. Liu, Batabyal, N. Mathews, L. H. Wong and M. Graetzel,
A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 1479–1482.
21874–21879; (c) Z. Xing, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, 243 Y. Lu, D. Wang, P. Yang, Y. Du and C. Lu, Catal. Sci.
ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 145–149. Technol., 2014, 4, 2650–2657.
224 B. R. Sathe, X. Zou and T. Asefa, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 244 F. A. Frame and F. E. Osterloh, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114,
4, 2023–2030. 10628–10633.
225 Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, L. H. Li, T. Xing, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec and 245 G. Tian, Y. Chen, Z. Ren, C. Tian, K. Pan, W. Zhou, J. Wang
S. Z. Qiao, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5290–5296. and H. Fu, Chem. – Asian J., 2014, 9, 1291–1297.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 | 5179
View Article Online
246 G. Chen, N. Ding, F. Li, Y. Fan, Y. Luo, D. Li and Q. Meng, 264 C.-Y. Lin, D. Mersch, D. A. Jefferson and E. Reisner, Chem.
Appl. Catal., B, 2014, 160, 614–620. Sci., 2014, 5, 4906–4913.
247 L. Wei, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, H. Wu, R. Yuan and Z. Li, Appl. 265 T. Bourgeteau, D. Tondelier, B. Geffroy, R. Brisse, C. L.
Catal., B, 2014, 144, 521–527. Robert, S. Campidelli, R. Bettignies, V. Artero, S. Palacin
248 C. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Tang, S. Luo, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Zeng and B. Jousselme, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 2706–2713.
and Y. Xu, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 164, 1–9. 266 P. D. Tran, S. S. Pramana, V. S. Kale, M. Nguyen,
249 Y.-F. Zhao, Z.-Y. Yang, Y.-X. Zhang, L. Jing, X. Guo, Z. Ke, S. Y. Chiam, S. K. Batabyal, L. H. Wong, J. Barber and
P. Hu, G. Wang, Y.-M. Yan and K.-N. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C, J. Loo, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18, 13994–13999.
2014, 118, 14238–14245. 267 B. Seger, A. B. Laursen, P. C. K. Vesborg, T. Pedersen,
250 K. Nakagawa, T. Jia, W. Zheng, S. M. Fairclough, M. Katoh, O. Hansen, S. DahI and I. Chorkendorff, Angew. Chem., Int.
Published on 17 April 2015. Downloaded by Politecnico di Milano on 5/8/2020 6:45:38 PM.
S. Sugiyama and S. C. E. Tsang, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, Ed., 2012, 51, 9128–9131.
13702–13705. 268 A. B. Laursen, T. Pedersen, P. Malacrida, B. Seger,
251 Y. Hou, A. B. Laursen, J. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Zhu, X. Wang, O. Hansen, P. C. K. Vesborg and I. Chorkendorff, Phys.
S. DahI and I. Chorkendorff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 20000–20004.
52, 3621–3625. 269 Q. Ding, F. Meng, C. R. English, M. Cabán-Acevedo,
252 J. Wang, Z. Guan, J. Huang, Q. Li and J. Yang, J. Mater. M. J. Shearer, D. Liang, A. S. Daniel, R. J. Hamers and
Chem. A, 2014, 2, 7960–7966. S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8504–8507.
253 M. L. Tang, D. C. Grauer, B. Lassalle-Kaiser, V. K. 270 Z. Huang, C. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Meng, C. Lv, Z. Chen,
Yachandra, L. Amirav, J. R. Long, J. Yano and A. P. R. Han and C. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6,
Alivisatos, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 10203–10207. 10408–10414.
254 W. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Zhong and R. Xu, Chem. 271 L. Gao, Y. Cui, J. Wang, A. Cavalli, A. Standing, T. T. T. Vu,
Commun., 2010, 46, 7631–7633. M. A. Verheijen, J. E. M. Haverkort, E. P. A. M. Bakkers and
255 J. Hong, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Zhang and R. Xu, Chem- P. H. L. Notten, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 3715–3719.
SusChem, 2013, 6, 2263–2268. 272 C. G. Morales-Guio, S. D. Tilley, H. Vrubel, M. Grätzel and
256 N. Li, B. Zhou, P. Guo, J. Zhou and D. Jing, Int. J. Hydrogen X. Hu, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3059.
Energy, 2013, 38, 11268–11277. 273 C. Yang, P. D. Tran, P. P. Boix, P. S. Bassi, N. Yantara,
257 Z. Chen, P. Sun, B. Fan, Z. Zhang and X. Fang, J. Phys. L. H. Wong and J. Barber, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 6506–6510.
Chem. C, 2014, 118, 7801–7807. 274 S. P. Berglund, H. He, W. D. Chemelewski, H. Celio,
258 L. Zhang, B. Tian, F. Chen and J. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen A. Dolocan and C. B. Mullins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014,
Energy, 2012, 37, 17060–17067. 136, 1535–1544.
259 L. Yin, Y.-P. Yuan, S.-W. Cao, Z. Zhang and C. Xue, RSC 275 (a) C. C. L. McCrory, S. Jung, I. M. Ferrer, S. M. Chatman,
Adv., 2014, 4, 6127–6132. J. C. Peters and T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137,
260 J. Wang, B. Li, J. Chen, N. Li, J. Zheng, J. Zhao and Z. Zhu, 4347–4357; (b) C. C. L. McCrory, S. Jung, J. C. Peters and
Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 259, 118–123. T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 16977–16987.
261 Y. Zhu, Y. Xu, Y. Hou, Z. Ding and X. Wang, Int. J. Hydrogen 276 (a) X. Zou, A. Goswami and T. Asefa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013,
Energy, 2014, 39, 11873–11879. 135, 17242–17245; (b) M. W. Kanan and D. G. Nocera,
262 Z. Yu, J. Meng, J. Xiao, Y. Li and Y. Li, Int. J. Hydrogen Science, 2008, 321, 1072–1075; (c) X. Zou, J. Su, R. Silva,
Energy, 2014, 39, 15387–15393. A. Goswami, B. R. Sathe and T. Asefa, Chem. Commun., 2013,
263 S. Cao, Y. Chen, C.-J. Wang, P. He and W-F. Fu, Chem. 49, 7522–7524; (d) J. Zhao, Y. Zou, X. Zou, T. Bai, Y. Liu,
Commun., 2014, 50, 10427–10429. R. Gao, D. Wang and G.-D. Li, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 7255–7262.
5180 | Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148--5180 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015