Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IFRS Implication I
IFRS Implication I
Print
Posted: T ue, Dec 28 2010. 9:14 PM IST
Prac tically the whole world, other than the US, adopted or converged with
IFRS over a period of time. Even the US allows IFRS in limited circ umstanc es;
foreign private insurers, for instance, are allowed to file IFRS financ ial
statements rather than follow US GAAP standards. In 2011, the US will
announce its position on IFRS adoption/c onvergence for local US filers. In a
nutshell, IFRS is the biggest ac counting change in a generation for many
c ountries and c ompanies around the world.
IFRS has numerous disc losure requirements and would provide a lot more
information than Indian GAAP. Increased transparency can prompt managers to
act more in the interests of shareholders. In particular, timely loss recognition
in financial statements increases the incentive for managers to attend to
existing loss-making investments and strategies more quic kly, and to make
fewer new investments with negative net present value (NPV).
There are numerous accounting differenc es between IFRS and Indian GAAP. For
example, under Indian GAAP, in the c ase of foreign c urrenc y c onvertible bonds
(FCCBs), the issuer company does not value the option to convert to shares
the holder has, and redemption premium is generally charged to the securities
premium account. Consequently, there is no c harge to the inc ome statement.
Under IFRS, the accounting results in a significant impact on the income
statement as the option is fairly valued in eac h reporting period and the
livemint.com/Articles/PrintArticle.aspx?a… 1/3
1/2/2011 Print Article - livemint
redemption premium is c onsidered at the market rate of interest.
IFRS may provide new information about a c ompany, positive or negative. For
example, under Indian GAAP, structured entities were not c onsolidated or
hedge losses were carried forward, and those are accounted under IFRS. This
would have a bearing on the investors’ perc eption of the value of the c ompany.
In the past, the market value of companies that reported huge financ ial losses
on account of their derivative portfolio took a significant beating.
Companies reporting under IFRS for the first time should communicate the
impac t of IFRS conversion to investors much in advance so as to keep them
prepared. Any last-minute negative news to an investor who is not prepared in
advance will c ertainly trigger an adverse reac tion. In Australia, c ompanies
prepared their investors months ahead of the formal reporting under IFRS. As a
result, IFRS reporting did not have any significant impact on the market value
of many Australian c ompanies.
Small investors may not have the skill sets or the ability to interpret IFRS
financial statements when compared to a sophistic ated investor. Suc h
investors should seek high-level training in IFRS and bec ome better informed.
Companies should also ensure that their investors are appropriately trained in
IFRS and generally have a better understanding of what is being reported under
it.
The series, written by Dolphy D’Souza, a partner and national IFRS leader at
c onsultancy firm Ernst and Young, will focus on what company promoters and
investors should look for.
livemint.com/Articles/PrintArticle.aspx?a… 3/3