Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 28 views

    Ravindra Kumar Parashar and Others V State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh and Another Facts

    Uploaded by

    Harsha Ammineni
    The petitioners filed an election petition challenging the results of a State Bar Council election. As per Rule 31(2) of the 2006 Rules, the petitioners deposited Rs. 10,000 as court fees along with the petition. However, the Tribunal rejected the petition, holding that each petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 10,000 individually, totaling Rs. 50,000. The petitioners appealed this decision. The key issue is whether Rule 31(2) requires each petitioner to pay court fees of Rs. 10,000 for each petition or a single payment of Rs. 10,000 can suffice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ravindra Kumar Parashar and Others V State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh and Another Facts

    Uploaded by

    Harsha Ammineni
    28 views1 page
    The petitioners filed an election petition challenging the results of a State Bar Council election. As per Rule 31(2) of the 2006 Rules, the petitioners deposited Rs. 10,000 as court fees along with the petition. However, the Tribunal rejected the petition, holding that each petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 10,000 individually, totaling Rs. 50,000. The petitioners appealed this decision. The key issue is whether Rule 31(2) requires each petitioner to pay court fees of Rs. 10,000 for each petition or a single payment of Rs. 10,000 can suffice.

    Original Description:

    ios 6

    Original Title

    18

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioners filed an election petition challenging the results of a State Bar Council election. As per Rule 31(2) of the 2006 Rules, the petitioners deposited Rs. 10,000 as court fees along with the petition. However, the Tribunal rejected the petition, holding that each petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 10,000 individually, totaling Rs. 50,000. The petitioners appealed this decision. The key issue is whether Rule 31(2) requires each petitioner to pay court fees of Rs. 10,000 for each petition or a single payment of Rs. 10,000 can suffice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    28 views1 page

    Ravindra Kumar Parashar and Others V State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh and Another Facts

    Uploaded by

    Harsha Ammineni
    The petitioners filed an election petition challenging the results of a State Bar Council election. As per Rule 31(2) of the 2006 Rules, the petitioners deposited Rs. 10,000 as court fees along with the petition. However, the Tribunal rejected the petition, holding that each petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 10,000 individually, totaling Rs. 50,000. The petitioners appealed this decision. The key issue is whether Rule 31(2) requires each petitioner to pay court fees of Rs. 10,000 for each petition or a single payment of Rs. 10,000 can suffice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Ravindra Kumar Parashar and others v State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh and

    another1

    FACTS:
    Advocates & Judges and its State Bar Council Election Rules, 2006, rr. 31(2), 31(2) .There
    was Bar council election . Question is regarding the Validity of Court fee deposit & Election
    for State Bar Council was held and results were declared, electing 25 members of State Bar
    Council. Petitioners, being dissatisfied by declaration of result, filed a combined petition
    before Tribunal under provisions of r. 31 (1) and (2) of 2006 Rules. Petitioners deposited a
    sum of Rs. 10,000/- as Court fees as prescribed u/r. 31(2) of 2006 Rules with election
    petition. Tribunal rejected petition holding that each petitioner is required to deposit Rs.
    10,000/- as Court fees, in total Rs. 50,000/-
    Petitioners were aggrieved by above order. So, Hence instant petition.
    ISSUE:
    Whether R. 31(2) of 2006 Rules does provide for payment of Court fee by each of petitioner
    but payment of Rs. 10,000/- on each petition or not?

    1
    2009 Indlaw CTH 252

    You might also like