Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

Intro

We are told “diversity is our strength” in a mantra of conformity.

We are taught the sanctimony of democracy while the elite try to override democratic votes.

Our elites tell us we live in an age of equality – and yet some groups are more equal than others.

We are told political correctness is just about being polite to one another and yet it is responsible for
the covering up of crimes on an industrial scale

This is because we live in a revolutionised society, where the old values have been replaced with
new ones - but because the revolution has happened in slow motion – none of us have noticed.

This is the story of how Britain has been captured by radicals – all the old institutions of law, media,
academia, religion and government have been destroyed and replaced.

What we have left is a revolutionary society governed by lies – because no one can remember the
truth.

1968

In the 1960’s student activists would begin to put into practice ideas that had been developed
underground in the 50’s.1 They began a rebellion against, what they considered the stifling and
oppressive conservatism of society – built on the hierarchy of the family and Christian institutions.

Radical feminists yearned to liberate themselves from the expectations of motherhood. Black power
movements sort to free themselves of police authority. Workers union’s worked to dominate
capitalists. And everyone seemed to wish to be free to take mind altering drugs and indulge their
sexual desires unhindered by shame.

What they sort they called “liberty” which could only be achieved through a revolution of society.
Together they would produce what became known as “the swinging 60’s.”

The influencers amongst these students movements would be Trotskyist and the Russian revolution
would be their inspiration. The revolution that overthrew the zar would be taken over by the
Bolsheviks lead by Lenin and they would attempt to reconstruct society reworking the fabric of
economic and social relations in order to create a new man - one fit to build a communist paradise
that had overthrown capitalism.

This system would depend of a dictatorship (of “oppressed” people) where no other power should
compete.

Churches were destroyed. Private life and the married family attacked. Forced collectivisation,
purges and mass imprisonment would follow.

1
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

The system would fail and collapse and the idea of a communist utopia being achievable at the end
of a bayonet discredited.

In 1968 student protests swept across the West. This would mark the beginning of a slow motion
revolution that would radically change the whole of society.

In Paris radical student groups from Nanterre University would engage in violent clashes with police.
Factor workers would join the students in protest and go on strike.

Similar movements would protest in Germany, Poland and America.

At the height of US war with Vietnam Trotskist students in the UK organised an anti-war march.
10,000 protestors gathered in Trafalgar Square to organise a march on the US embassy.

The demonstration would end, again, in violent clashes with the police in Grosnevor square, outside
the American embassy.

The first protestors to break the police cordon would be Kim Howells, a student radical known
affectionately as Kim “Il-Sung”2. Howells had earned a reputation at Hornsey Art College after
organising a 6 week shutdown of the college by students and staff. They would call for a mass
transformation of the educational system – one based, not on academic ability; but equality for all.3

Their desire for radical transformation would not be limited to academia and the abolition of
selective education but also the rest of society. They would propose a “revolutionary cultural
practice”4 and oppose imperialism, racism and immigration controls.5

There would be suspicions of outside influence on the college which attracted the attention of the
security services during Howells organised shutdown.6 Later in life Howells would play a role in the
New Labour government overlooking the work of the security services who, during the 60s and 70s,
had been looking him.

This generation of radical student activist would become known as the “68ers”. They would be the
first to take the lessons of neo-Marxist philosophers and use them to change society.

Cultural Revolution

As early as the 1920’s Marxists philosopher, Antonio Gramsci, came to realise that the violent
Boleshevik revolution in Russia would not be replicated in the rest of Europe. In prison he developed
a theory that power was not contained within capital but the institutions of civil society. Collectively
the institutions would dominate society by creating cultural “hegemony”.7

Students of Gramsci8 would come to learn that for the revolution to continue they must take control
of society’s institutions and create a new revolutionary cultural hegemony.

2
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

In the 1940s, Harry Pollit, the leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain, would give a lecture to
students at Cambridge University. He told them that instead of selling Marxist propaganda to the
workers they should study for degrees that would allow them to enter the British establishment. 9
This would be the first call for a “long march through the institutions” by the radical left.

Marxist philosopher, Herbert Marcuse, would join in this call for capturing the cogs of society by
radicals, 30 years later.10 His writings had already inspired the sexual revolution of the 60’s. In them
he argued that western civilisation was the enemy of freedom built on sexual repression. In order to
overthrow it the people would have to become sexually liberated and destroy the very foundation of
society – the Christian family.

Free from parental control, the people would become children – malleable to a new morality – one
fit for a revolutionary socialist society. All restraints on sexual practice would be thrown away, and
new norms would be created; pre-marital relationships, polygamy, adultery, homosexuality, until,
finally, it reached the barriers of society’s tolerance.

The ideas of the ’68 radicals would consume the education system. History would be re-written and
the ideas of nation states dissolved in favour of a world culture.11

Sex Education programmes where expanded in schools on the pretext of reducing teenage
pregnancy and disease.12 Both would increase as a result.13

Sex education had first been wielded as a revolutionary weapon after the Hungarian revolution by
Georgy Lukacs who the radical academics looked to as an authority on progressive education.14

Lukacs realised Communism couldn’t succeed in conservative society and wrote: “such a worldwide
overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values.” 15His education
programme would attempt to do just that, by demoralisation the children of a Christian society and
release them from the authority of their parents.16

The structure of education itself would be radically transformed in the pursuit of an equal society.
Qualifications watered down and devalued. Grammar schools would be banned and destroyed.

The TV studios would be seized. New ideas would be developed in the presenting of news – debates
would become scripted. This method of scripted stories would be pioneered by John Birt giving
programmes a “mission to explain” which in practice meant journalists were obligated to editorialise
the news.17 Guests would be invited to fulfil scripted contributions rather than provide their own. 18
Viewers would be left with only one conclusion to be drawn.

Working with Bert on the influential show, Weekend World, would be a young Peter Mandelson –
who would go on to become the Communications director for New Labour – while Bert would go on
to lead the BBC as director general – taking his method of presenting news to suit a preordained
narrative with him. While at the BBC Birt would install a vanguard of modernisers into key positions
of the BBC and it would form then on become the vanguard of the Cultural Revolution.19

3
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

Liberal lawyers and judges would besiege the legal system instituting reforms on social issues from
marriage to drug possession. Lord Hailsham would instruct magistrates to stop sending offenders of
drug possession to prison and the police would eventually concede to drug possession being
decriminalised in all but name.20

Divorce law reforms, making it easier, would weaken families and Lady Hale, a future Supreme Court
judge, would question the very existence of need for marriage.21

After most of the institutions seized, there was only one thing missing: a revolutionary government.

Revolutionary Government

Michael Foot would lead the Labour Party into the ’83 general election with a manifesto that would
be remembered for the excesses in left-wing demands. Unilateral nuclear disarmament would be it’s
most radical policy.

The manifesto also proposed to - ban grammar schools, abolish the House of Lords, create a
commissions for health and safety; as well as for women, create more renewable energy, abolish
corporal punishment, create elected police commissioners, enact Freedom of Information, create
devolved parliaments for Scotland and Northern Ireland, ban fox hunting, reduce defence spending,
create a department for international development, and leave the European Union.22

After a crushing defeat in that election the manifesto would become known as: “the longest suicide
note in history”23 because of its uncompromising left-wing radicalism; leaving the Labour Party
exiled from government for another 15 years. With no counter to Margarette thatcher and her free
market revolution the party would be left fighting with itself.

Neill Kinnock would become the new leader. A young advisor to Kinnock, called Peter Mandelson
would plot to recreate the Labour Party in order to once again make it electable. Having worked as a
TV producer Mandelson learnt the importance of presentation and theatre to manipulate public
perception.

The first step would be to persuade the public that the party had moved away from its radical
socialist past. In order to achieve this; the leadership would crush a section of its own party.

A group inside the party, known as the Militant Tendency, would gain control of the Liverpool
council. Publicly the tendency claimed it stood for democratic socialism.

Privately the Militant Tendency, secretly known as the Revolutionary Socialist League, considered it
job to recruit workers in preparation for the collapse of capitalism. The workers would then revolt
and create soviets to govern a new society.24

The new leader of the Labour Party, Neil Kinnock, would make a speech denouncing them.

Suspected members of Militant would be placed on trial and banished from the party. 25

4
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

This purge of Militant members would convince the public the Labour Party had finally cut its ties to
revolutionary socialism. This piece of theatre would allow Mandelson to conduct a revolution of his
own now free of suspicion of contamination with the old Red Guard.

Mandelson would help Kinnock rebrand the “progressive” policy of Labour socialism with an image
of modernisation.

To complete this modernisation of the party would require a new, youthful leadership. Mandelson
would fastrack the political career of youthful rockstar wannabe and aspiring actor to be elected to
lead “New Labour”. His name was Anthony Blair.

Blair, now the face of the modernisers would be joined with Gordon Brown and Alastair Campbell
together with its original architect.

As part of the modernisation process New Labour would publicly accept Thatcher’s free market
revolution26 but their commitment to a socialist re-ordering of Britain, one free of religious influence
and governed by human rights in the pursuit of equality, would remain.

After 18 years out of office Tony Blair would lead New Labour into a general election against a tied a
demoralised Conservative party.

Their radical plans for government would be interspersed with Conservative rhetoric about family
and crime - convincing the public that this was what meant by modernisation.

The modernising revolutionaries would win a landslide victory.

Labour party activist, issued with union jack flags, would be gathered outside No10 to greet the new
leader in an orchestrated celebration for the TV cameras.

And the questions of the true nature of New Labour would we quietly forgotten.

Into the Memory Hole

Once in government, the authors of New Labour would have the chance to destroy the secrets of
their own Marxist roots - allowing them to fool the media, along with the public, that the Labour
party had become a soft-conservative party.

With their hands now firmly on the levers of power; the authors of New Labour would have the
secrets of their revolutionary origins destroyed.

After the Second World War British security services were tasked with keeping tabs on Trotskyist
revolutionary groups and collected intelligence on their members. Among these groups would be
future members of the Blair cabinet.

5
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

Health Secretary, Alan Milburn, in his student days worked in the Marxist bookshop, Days of Hope,
known locally as Haze of Dope27, while regularly attending Campaign for Nuclear Disarment
meetings. The CND would attract the attention security services for its communist sympathies and
support from the Communist Party of Great Britain.28

Milburn would also be a member of the International Marxist Group a Trotskyist group originally
dedicated to taking over the Labour party29 which would go on to occupy the single issues student
movements of the 60s and 70s.30

He would not be the only New Labour alumini in the IMG. He would also be joined by future
chancellor, Alastair Darling31 and defence secretary, Bob Ainsworth32.

Home Secretary, John Reid had joined the Communist party of Great Britian and developed a habit
of quoting Antonio Gramsci. While visiting the US during the 80’s his communist ties would have him
placed on visa restrictions.33

Stephen Byers had been a member of Militant34 and ended up surviving the purge by Kinnock to
become Transport Secretary.

Before his efforts to modernise the Labour Party Peter Mandelson had been a youthful revolutionary
as a member of the Young Communist League.35 Records of a membership of the Communist Party
were also alleged to have existed.36

Years later Blair himself would admit to being a revolutionary Trotskyist.

Once in power Mandelson would order the records to be destroyed.37

Freed from the secrets of the past New Labour could govern without fear of this deception being
revealed.

Macpherson Report (Revolutionary Inquisition)

In 1993 A Mother and Father received a call from their neighbours that their son had been attacked -
when they arrived at the hospital they discovered their 18 year old son had died.

The murder of the Stephen Lawrence would quickly become national news and sparked fury across
the nation. Race would become the central issue in the aftermath.

Anti-racist activists would arrive at the Lawrence’s home the next afternoon to lead a campaign
against the police. They would set up an office there and not leave for weeks. 38

The teenager’s murder would provide a catalyst for revolutionary change within the police – one
that had been missed several years earlier. Following the Scarman Report into the Brixton Riots
Mandelson described its findings as “radical and useful.”39 Once in government the death of Stephen
Lawrence would prove useful in implementing radical reforms of the police.

6
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

The killers of Stephen Lawrence where quickly identified by the police as four teenage thugs with
connections to organised crime, but the Crown Prosecution Service refused to put them on trial
because there wasn’t enough evidence to convict them.

Outraged, The Lawrence’s employed their own lawyer, a left wing activist named Imran Khan40, to
represent their complaints of the police. They would also enlist the help of Radical barrister Michael
Mansfield41 and attempt to prosecute the killers themselves. The case quickly collapsed, just as the
CPS had predicted, and all four killers walked free.

Angered by the injustice the Lawrence’s and the activists surrounding them would blame the police
for the failure of the prosecution accusing them of not properly investigating the murder of their
son.

Calls were made for the government to conduct an inquiry into Stephen Lawrence’s death and the
handling of the investigation by the police. A Conservative government refused. Instead, New Labour
would promise the family, privately, an enquiry into the death of their son if they gained power in
the next general election. 42 Once in power the Home secretary, Jack Straw, would announce the
inquiry to parliament to look into both the police and the CPS.43

The inquiry would become a show trial of the Metropolitan Police on a charge of racism. They would
be accused of not investigating the murder effectively because Stephen Lawrence was black and the
killers had been white. Sir William Macpherson would find the police guilty of “institutional racism”
although no proof of the charge was ever produced during the inquiry.44

They were accused of stereotyping Stephen’s best friend, Dwayne Brooks, who was with him when
he died, as angry an aggressive young black man though none of the accounts of Brooks’ behaviour
were ever disputed.45

The Lawrence’s accused Police of ignoring a list of the killer’s names the Lawrences gave them – the
names on the list, however, were already under investigation.

Police were accused of insensitive and a patronising attitude to the Lawrence who the police
thought where being manipulated by activist. The Lawrence’s would later admit they have been
used and scared by fanatics who had colonised their home for weeks after their son’s murder.46

Despite the lack of evidence, the metropolitan police would forever become known as
“institutionally racist” and the Macpherson report would set in motion a wave of radical reforms.
Charges of racism, and later hate crime, would become offences that would no longer require
evidence.

Social justice groups would be admitted into the police to train them in “unconscious bias”. New
theories of crime prevention would be introduced. The cloud of institutional racism label would hang
over the police restraining them from investigating and prosecuting crimes committed by minorities.

7
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

A new ideology of crime as a social disease caused by social and economic inequality would capture
the police. Crime would rise and the increase in figures would be hidden.47 And this would lead to
the police delving ever more into social issues and begin to police speech and thought.

The Macpherson report had indeed proved to be “radical and useful” to the revolutionaries.

Lords Reform

With New Labour now in power they would set about rewriting the British constitution and attack
what they disparagingly referred to as “inherited privilege”. In doing so they would destroy the last
opposition to their revolutionary political programme.

They set to work on removing hereditary peers form the House of Lords - a 300 years old institution
developing into an independent check on national government. The job of reforming the House of
Lords would be given to the daughter of former Labour Prime Minster, James Callaghan; Baroness
Margaret Jay. She would treat the hereditary peers with open contempt.

The Blairites had learnt from Thatcher’s time in office that the old conservative establishment have a
reverence for women – making political opposition to them alien.

Baroness Jay would be vital in blunting any opposition to Lords reform.

Just like Margarette Thatcher cabinet, the hereditary peers would be shy in launching protest at
Baroness Jay and her desire to destroy them

(Baroness) Jay would arrive at the final moments of riding the chamber of the majority of hereditary
peers without serious complaint until the last moment when the Earl of Burford would launch a
protest in the House of Lords accusing the government of adopting the policy of a foreign power.

This would make Baroness nervous.

This last ditch attempt by the Earl of Burford would fail. A precedent would be set for the removal of
the hereditary principle with possible future consequences for the British Monarchy.

Once the reforms were enacted the chamber would be no more democratic. Instead it would be
filled with appointments by the New Labour Government. They would become known as “Tony’s
Cronies”.48

The last of the opposition to the government would be eradicated.

European Union (The Revolutionary Union)

The old left had been an opponent of European Union and Blair himself had stood on an election
pledge to leave the EEC in 1983.49

8
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

By the time he reached number 10 however, the Blair government had recognised the revolutionary
potential of British membership of the EU.

In the 1920’s, French political economist, Jean Monnet, had devised a plan that would reshape post
World War II Europe.

Along with British civil servant, Arthur Salter the two would embark on a plan to intertwine the
economies of the European nations. They theorised that if the markets of coal and steel, industry
vital to waging war, were collectivised the ability of nations to make war on each other would be
removed.50

To control this market would require a supranational government with authority over each of the
nation states to create what they called: the “United States of Europe.”

Monnet’s idea would put into practice after the second world war and the six nations of West
Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands would come together to create
the European Coal and Steel Community – a supranational government which would be the embryo
for Monnet’s “United States of Europe.”51

To persuade the British public to accept this project the people would be fed propaganda by a group
within the foreign office called the Information Research Group.52

In discreet breakfast meetings organised by the European Movement the IRD would give journalists
at the BBC pro-union stories to be played on influential TV and radio programmes. As, Geoffrey
Tucker, the organiser of these meetings put it: “nobbling is the name of the game.”53

Far from being manipulated by the government, journalists were actively helping them in their
campaign.54 Journalists who did not support the project, were side-lined. Seen as an opponent of EU
integration, BBC’s Jack De Manio would be removed from his position by (BBC DG) after being
lobbied by the IRD. From then on the BBC would become crucial for sustaining deception and British
membership of EU.

Britain would join the project in 1973 but the public would not be told of the “revolutionary
implications” of surrendering parliamentary sovereignty.

Two years later a referendum would be held on continuing membership the electorate deceived that
membership was now more than economic and not political.

Opposition to the European federalism would last in the Labour party until, in 1988, EU commission
president; Jacquers Delors made a speech to the Trade Union Congress. He would tell the unions
they should welcome European integration because the reforms they wanted would be
implemented and they would not be able to be undone by the Conservative party.55 What was
happening, he explained, was a “peaceful revolution.”56

9
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

From then on the Unions, along with the Labour Party, would support European integration and all
opponents of Britain’s membership of the EU would be dismissed as cranks and racists.

The extent of which the EU was to dominate British institutions would be hidden from the public.
Politicians would take credit for devising legislation they were obliged to accept in the EU.57

Institutions would be bought up by the EU and local government encouraged to appeal directly to
Brussels for financial support - subverting national government.58 British law would become subject
ultimately to the European Supreme Court.

Burying national constitutions covertly in mountains of directives and legislation - the power of the
EU would grow until it was capable of exercising arbitrary authority.

In 2001 Police would raid a market stall, arresting the owner Steven Thoburn and seizing his scales.
He would be charged and convicted for selling fruit in pounds and ounces. The law prohibiting
imperial measurements would be the result of an EU directive. The judge in Thoburn’s case, Eleanor
Sharpston QC, after convicting him, would state that British sovereignty was merely “legal and
political history”59

Having developed into a union with a council of ministers, a court of justice, parliament and
presidium retaining central control over nations allowed only to keep a semblance of independence
the European Union would come to resemble that of another supranational institution – the USSR.60

Once the Blairites came to power they would commit themselves to the EU project taking advantage
of its ability to protect their desired reforms from ever being repealed by the Conservatives.

They wouldn’t, however, reveal the full extent of the loss of British sovereignty.

Britiain’s membership would become key to the radical’s plan to truly revolutionising British society.

Immigration (A Truly Diverse Society)

Throughout its history the Labour party would dedicate itself to achieving full employment but had
never been able to deal with the problem of the high inflation that would result.61 Gordon Brown
devised a plan to achieve full employment while managing “macro-economic stability”.62 New
Labour would impose pay restraint to create a more competitive labour market.63 To achieve this,
the government were going to use immigration to create a low wage economy. The so-called party
of the workers would be creating policy deliberately to lower the wages of workers.

A secret report was commissioned to look into the effects of mass immigration. The report
concluded mass immigration to the UK would also be beneficial for achieving the governments
“social objectives”.64 Beyond economic rationales, the government was going to use immigration to
truly revolutionise British society.

10
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

Blair would appoint Barbara Roche as immigration minister who herself disdained British history and
identity.65 She would make a speech saying the UK should implement a new immigration policy of
opening the borders.66 Little attention was paid to the speech by the media and the public would be
unaware of the changes that would result. While Roche claimed that migration would managed,
Home Secretary David Blunkett would later say there was “no obvious limit” to the numbers that
could be allowed in the country.67

The Blair government would dissolve its borders into the European Union – prohibiting any
restrictions on European citizens entering the UK. The government said this would likely lead to an
increase of 13,000 people coming to the UK from Eastern Europe each year. The real figure would be
30 times higher.68

Warnings delivered to Blair and his team that the influx of people was depressing wages and placing
a strain on public services were ignored.69 Instead the government would rely on a report by
Jonathan Portes, a civil servant who had been influential in devising a new immigration policy,
claiming there was no evidence that migrants placed extra pressure on schools and hospitals or had
any effect on wages to deflect criticism. A Migration Advisory Committee would establish this to be
false.70

As the effect of open border became apparent opposition would grow and dissidents began
campaigning for a reversal of New Labours open borders policy. Encouraged by Blair’s
communications director, these opponents of mass immigration would be smeared as racist.71

Producing a climate of fear, the government was then free to continue lying to country about the
numbers arriving in Britain. They would claim publicly that immigration would be controlled but
Mandelson, years later, would admit to sending our search parties around the world encouraging
people to migrate to Britain.72

The man who had been responsible for writing Roche’s immigration speech in 2000, Andrew
Neather, would quietly reveal that the policy of mass immigration had been deliberately intended
“to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.” Neither also admitted
the policy had also been responsible for providing the elites themselves with cheap labour to employ
as nannies, cleaners and gardeners.73

Having created a truly multicultural society a new ethic would be required to govern a nationally,
ethnically and religiously diverse population.

Equality & Diversity (Revolutionary Religion)

The Equality Bill 2010 would usher in the new ethic.

The bill would be introduced by Equalities minister, Harriet Harman, who had played her part in the
radical liberation movements of the 70s and 80s as lawyer for the National Council for Civil Liberties.

11
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

The NCCL would be affiliated with campaign groups for children’s sexual liberty – paedophiles – and
would advocate the lowering of the age of consent.74

Harman would introduce the bill claiming it would end social and racial discrimination - but its
effects would be wide ranging.

A senior cabinet member would describe the bill as “socialism in one clause”.75

The bill would require Businesses to appoint Equality watchdogs and would hand powers to
companies to discriminate in favour of selected groups - in the name of equality

Judges would be given the duty of deciphering the meaning of legislation where the rights of
protected groups conflicted with other groups - making them bishops of the new state religion.

Despite the old religions being given a protected status within the legalisation - the law would
consistently discriminate against Christianity.

The courts would uphold the sacking of a nurse, Sarah Kuteh, after she offered to pray for patients.
Kuteh would be suspended from nursing practice; her union would not represent her having also
signed up to the new ethic.76

A Christian couple, Eunice and Owen Johns, after 20 years, were told they would no longer be able
to foster children because they had refused to promote a homosexual lifestyle that conflicted with
their religious ethic.

The court told the Johns that the society they lived in was no longer Christian and could expect no
protection from the law. The Equality and Human Rights Council told the court that the Johns could
be “re-educated”.77

There would be no political opposition to what the government was doing because both sides
agreed.

This new ethic, its foundation inside an EU directive, would be protected from repeal. But the
introduction of bill would bring into sharp focus a curious change in British politics. The opposition
no longer opposed what the radicals were doing.

Revolution Continues in Opposition (Revolutionary Opposition)

After a third election defeat to Labour the Conservative party would hold a leadership election. The
campaign for the leadership would take place within the media and leadership hopeful, David
Cameron, would signal his desire, like the Blairites before him, to modernise the Conservative party.

His message to the media would be that he had intention of opposing the Blair revolution instead
providing continuity.

12
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

Having won the Conservative leadership Cameron would go on to become prime minister. But far
from the opposition triumphing over the Blairites – having started their long march 40 years before –
the revolutionaries had won.

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but
already it was impossible to say which was which.

The radicals had captured the institution, conquered the opposition and revolutionised society.

1
Peter Hitchens & Linda Grant on The Sexual Revolution 2013 Bristol Festival of Ideas,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAvdoeKyvrc
2
Profile: Kim Howells, The Sunday Times, https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/profile-kim-howells-t00ccc6kv0h
3
Hornsey 1968 The Art School Revolution, Lisa Tickner, P.22
4
Hornsey 1968 The Art School Revolution, Lisa Tickner, P.87
5
Hornsey 1968 The Art School Revolution, Lisa Tickner, P.69
6
MI5's watchdog Kim Howells was an art school anarchist... trailed by the Spooks in his revolutionary student
days, Jason Lewis, Peter Day, Mail on Sunday, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1084106/MI5s-
watchdog-Kim-Howells-art-school-anarchist--trailed-Spooks-revolutionary-student-days.html
7
The Prison Notebooks, Antonio Gramsci, http://abahlali.org/files/gramsci.pdf
8
Tony Blair and the Marxists, Angela McRobbie, openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/1093/
9
The Secret State – Whitehall and the Cold War, Peter Hennessey, P.22
10
Counterrevolution and Revolt, Herbert Marcuse, P.55-56
11
The Abolition of Britain, Peter Hitchens, P.40-47
12
A brief history of sex education, OpenLearn, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/body-mind/health/health-
studies/brief-history-sex-education
13
Trends in teenage pregnancy in England and Wales, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107689909200603
14
Thinkers of the New Left, Roger Scruton, P.145, https://portalconservador.com/livros/Roger-Scruton-
Thinkers-of-the-New-Left.pdf
15
Georg Lukacs – From Romanticism to Bolshevism, Michael Lowy, P.130
16
Georg Lukacs – From Romanticism to Bolshevism, Michael Lowy, P.151
17
Can We Still Trust The BBC?, Robin Aitken, P.61-64
18
Mandelson and the Making of New Labour, Donald Macintyre, P.80
19
Can We Still Trust The BBC?, Robin Aitken, P.66-67
20
Home Affairs Committee - Drugs: Breaking the Cycle
Written evidence submitted by Peter Hitchens,
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/184/184wea24.htm
21
A fight for equality? No, it's a plot to wipe out marriage, Peter Hitchens,
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4260130/PETER-HITCHENS-plot-wipe-marriage.html
22
The New Hope for Britain, Labour Manifesto 1983, http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1983/1983-
labour-manifesto.shtml
23
BBC Rewind: 1983 Labour manifesto, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-32287585/bbc-rewind-
1983-labour-manifesto
24
The March of Militant, Michael Crick, P.76, p.81-82
25
The Wilderness Years – Enter the Rose, BBC, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DBqwerqCOs
26
The Blair Revolution – Can New Labour Deliver?, Peter Mandelson & Roger Liddle, P.1
27
Milburn’s Radical Days, Brian Wheeler, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1871072.stm
28
The Secret State, Peter Hennessy
29
The Far Left in British Politics, John Callaghan, P.120
30
The Far Left in British Politics, John Callaghan, P.123

13
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

31
Britain’s Chancellor Alistair Darling and the International Marxist Group, Chris Marsden,
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008/09/darl-s27.html
32
Bob Ainsworth Biography, https://www.politics.co.uk/reference/robert-william-ainsworth
33
John Reid: The big Reid, Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/john-reid-the-
big-reid-19336.html
34
Spinning off the rails, Sean O’Grady, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/spinning-off-the-
rails-9132560.html
35
Mandelson and the Making of New Labour, Donald Macintyre, P.26
36
Mandelson and the Making of New Labour, Donald Macintyre, P.31-32
37
Security Service Files (25 February 1998), Hansard, https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/1998-02-
25/debates/539b58d4-9739-4639-82ed-687a84f458fb/SecurityServiceFiles
38
The Case of Stephen Lawrence, Brian Cathcart, P.107
39
Mandelson and the Making of New Labour, Donald Macintyre, P.68
40
The Case of Stephen Lawrence, Brian Cathcart, P.379-80
41
The Case of Stephen Lawrence, Brian Cathcart, P.175
42
The Case of Stephen Lawrence, Brain Cathcart, P.291
43
Jack Straw (31 July 1998), Hansard, https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-
answers/1997/jul/31/stephen-lawrence#S6CV0299P0_19970731_CWA_977
44
The Case of Stephen Lawrence, Brian Cathcart, P.357
45
The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (Report), Sir William Macpherson
46
Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics, Norman Dennis, George Erdos & Ahmed Al-Shahi ,P.69,
http://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/cs05.pdf
47
Public Administration Committee, Tuesday 19 November 2013,
https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/4361b058-d3b7-446e-a4b8-2d6bac63b764
48
Life in the Lords is too tough says Labour peer (The Telegraph), George Jones,
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1351595/Life-in-the-Lords-is-too-tough-says-Labour-peer.html
49
Tony Blair's election campaign literature from Sedgefield in 1983,
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/tony-blairs-election-pledges-1983-12938528
50
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North,
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
51
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North, P.75
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
52
Can We Still Trust The BBC?, Robin Aitken, P.120
53
Can We Still Trust The BBC?, Robin Aitken, P.121
54
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North, P.182,
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
55
How the TUC learned to love the European Union and how the affair turned out, Trade Union and
Employment Forum, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/trade-union-forum/meeting/how-the-tuc-learned-to-
love-the-european-union-and-how-the-affair-turned-ou
56
Jacques Delors speech to the TUC 1988, https://c59574e9047e61130f13-
3f71d0fe2b653c4f00f32175760e96e7.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/7C4B2DDEB5CE4B4AB639943D78A556E6.pdf
57
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North, P.415,
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
58
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North, P.282,
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
59
‘Metric Martyr’ Convicted, Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/apr/09/2
60
The Great Deception, Christopher Booker & Richard North, P.502,
https://thereferist.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/greatdeception.pdf
61
A Strange Eventful History, Edmund Dell, P.517-519
62
The Blair Revolution – Can New Labour Deliver?, Peter Mandelson & Roger Liddle, P.74
63
The Blair Revolution – Can New Labour Deliver?, Peter Mandelson & Roger Liddle, P.97
64
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON MIGRATION 11 JULY 2000,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98945/m
igration-report-july-2000.pdf
65
Broken Vows – Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power, Tom Bower, P.172
66
Call for immigration rethink, BBC, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/920182.stm

14
Revolutionary Britain – The Last Soviet, Joe Audritt

67
Blunkett: no UK immigration limit, The Guardian,
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/nov/13/immigrationpolicy.immigration
68
How immigration came to haunt Labour: the inside story, The Guardian,
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/mar/24/how-immigration-came-to-haunt-labour-inside-story
69
How immigration came to haunt Labour: the inside story, The Guardian,
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/mar/24/how-immigration-came-to-haunt-labour-inside-story
70
Broken Vows – Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power, Tom Bower, P.174
71
Broken Vows – Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power, Tom Bower, P.318
72
Immigrants? We sent out search parties to get them to come... and made it hard for Britons to get work,
says Mandelson, Tim Shipman, MailOnline, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324112/Lord-
Mandelson-Immigrants-We-sent-search-parties-hard-Britons-work.html
73
Don't listen to the whingers - London needs immigrants, Evening Standard,
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/dont-listen-to-the-whingers-london-needs-immigrants-6786170.html
74
How did the pro-paedophile group PIE exist openly for 10 years?, BBC,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378
75
Harman's law is Labour's biggest idea for 11 years, Polly Toynbee, The Guardian,
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jan/13/polly-toynbee-harriet-harman-social-mobility
76
NHS nurse who offered Bible to cancer patient 'rightly sacked' for her religious fervour', The Telegraph,
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/21/nhs-nurse-offered-bible-cancer-patient-loses-appeal-
tribunal/
77
Foster parent ban: 'extreme distress' of 'anti-gay' Christians' over ruling, The Telegraph,
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8353512/Foster-parent-ban-extreme-distress-of-anti-gay-
Christians-over-ruling.html

15