Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dance For PD
Dance For PD
Dance For PD
In 2001, Dance for Parkinson’s disease (DfPD®) classes for persons with Parkinson’s disease and
care partners were developed by Brooklyn Parkinson Group and Mark Morris Dance Group. A
previous assessment suggested that individuals experience positive benefits from DfPD®. The
current preliminary uncontrolled study investigated the effects of a dance intervention on several
motor and quality of life aspects of PD following 16 sessions (8 weeks; 20 h) taught by
professional dancers/teachers. A mixed methods design was used to determine the effects of the
class. Assessment instruments administered at baseline and post-intervention included the Hoehn
and Yahr, UPDRS (part III), Berg Balance Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and PDQ-39 and
individual interviews after the last class. Hoehn and Yahr scores ranged from 1 to 4. UPDRS III
total scores and sub scores of gait and tremor improved following the intervention (P < 0.05).
During interviews participants reported physical, emotional, and social benefits. Despite the
diversity of baseline measures post-class interview results were consistently positive across the
sample. Twelve of 14 subjects (mean age 66.2) with idiopathic PD completed the sessions. After
4 years, four participants regularly attended DfPD® classes. The low attrition rate and continued
attendance suggest notable adherence to the DfPD® class. The importance of the results is both
clinical and conceptual, highlighting the value of using both quantitative and qualitative data to
evaluate the benefits of dance with PD.
Albert C. Lo
Ali Heirani,
Hadis Mahmoodi &
Sana Sabaghi
Marguerite Harvey
David Houghton
William K. Gray
Kathryn L. Weston
Lloyd L. Oates
Barbara Romano
Richard W. Walker
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.
Original Article
16Shares
102Downloads
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Participants of early- to mid-stage disease were recruited from a single PD service in north-east
England, UK into two separate studies of exercise in PD, one involving moderate-intensity
continuous training (MICT) and one involving high-intensity interval training (HIIT), both had
control groups. In both the interventions, participants exercise three times per week for
12 weeks. Blood samples were taken for BDNF analysis at the start and end of the first session
and the start and end of the final session, with corresponding samples taken in controls.
Results
Data were available for 27 participants (13 intervention, 14 control) in the MICT intervention
and 17 (9 intervention, 8 control) in the HIIT intervention. BDNF level did not rise significantly
from the start to end of individual sessions. Across the 12 week period, they rose significantly in
the HIIT intervention group, but not in controls or the MICT intervention group.
Conclusions
High-intensity interval training appears to have a greater impact on BDNF than MICT. Future
work should directly compare exercise modalities and investigate the impact of BDNF levels on
disease progression and quality of life.