Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sta Rosa v. Amante
Sta Rosa v. Amante
SECTION 15. Registration of Beneficiaries. — The DAR committed by the administrative agency,78 which in these
in coordination with the Barangay Agrarian Reform cases the Court finds none.
Committee (BARC) as organized in this Act, shall register
all agricultural lessees, tenants and farmworkers who are SRRDC questions the constitutionality of Section 22 of
qualified to be beneficiaries of the CARP. These potential R.A. No. 6657, which reads in part:
beneficiaries with the assistance of the BARC and the
DAR shall provide the following data: SECTION 22. Qualified Beneficiaries. The lands
covered by the CARP shall be distributed as
(a) names and members of their immediate farm much as possible to landless residents of the
household; same barangay, or in the absence thereof,
landless residents of the same municipality in the
(b) owners or administrators of the lands they following order of priority.
work on and the length of tenurial relationship;
(a) agricultural lessees and share tenants;
(c) location and area of the land they work;
(b) regular farmworkers;
(d) crops planted; and
(c) seasonal farmworkers;
(e) their share in the harvest or amount of rental
paid or wages received. (d) other farmworkers;
A copy of the registry or list of all potential CARP (e) actual tillers or occupants of public lands;
beneficiaries in the barangay shall be posted in the
barangay hall, school or other public buildings in the (f) collectives or cooperatives of the above
barangay where it shall be open to inspection by the beneficiaries; and
public at all reasonable hours.
(g) others directly working on the land.
...
Meanwhile, Administrative Order No. 10 (Rules and
Procedures Governing the Registration of Beneficiaries), SRRDC argues that Section 22 "sweepingly declares
Series of 1989, provides: landless residents as beneficiaries of the CARP (to mean
also squatters)," in violation of Article XIII, Section 4 of
SUBJECT: I. PREFATORY STATEMENT the Constitution, which aims to benefit only the landless
farmers and regular farmworkers.79
Pursuant to Section 15, Chapter IV, of the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988, The Court cannot entertain such constitutional challenge.
the DAR, in coordination with the Barangay The requirements before a litigant can challenge the
Agrarian Reform Committee (BARC), as constitutionality of a law are well-delineated, viz.:
organized pursuant to RA 6657, shall register all
agricultural lessees, tenants and farmworkers (1) The existence of an actual and appropriate
who are qualified beneficiaries of the CARP. This case;
Administrative Order provides the Implementing
Rules and Procedures for the said registration.
(2) A personal and substantial interest of the party
raising the constitutional question;
...
(3) The exercise of judicial review is pleaded at
B. Specific the earliest opportunity; and
1. Identify the actual and potential farmer- (4) The constitutional question is the lis mota of
beneficiaries of the CARP. the case.80 (Emphasis supplied)
d) Cases arising from, or connected with Thus, the power to determine whether a property is
membership or representation in compact farms, agricultural and subject to CARP coverage together with
farmers’ cooperatives and other registered the identification, qualification or disqualification of
farmers’ associations or organizations, related to farmer-beneficiaries lies with the DAR Secretary.
land covered by the CARP and other agrarian
laws;
Page 2 of 2