Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Running Head: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
Running Head: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
Running Head: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
Interview Protocol
Ashley A. Curtis
Loyola University Chicago
INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
Interview Protocol
3) Please describe in what ways, if at all, you feel supported as a STARS intern?
a. Probing question: Can you tell me about a time in which you felt you either did,
or did not receive support?
4) Can you provide an example of a time in which you received mentorship from someone
in the STARS program?
a. Probing question: Who do you feel has been your strongest mentor in this
experience?
b. Probing question: What do you look for in your mentorship experience?
7) How has this experience as a STARS intern defined the way in which you view
leadership?
8) How and in what ways do you feel this experience as a STARS intern has developed your
leadership abilities/skills?
(2012) as cited in Henning and Roberts (2016), interviews are frequently used as a means to
2
INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
situation or idea” (Henning and Roberts, 2016, p.169). Acknowledging the intention of the
STARS assessment, to gain insight into the feelings and thoughts from the STARS mentors in
order to better understand their experiences within the program, and also being mindful that in
utilizing an interview approach, this has the ability to foster an environment that will allow the
participants to open up, be more vulnerable, and better engage in each of the questions,
The next stage of this process, was determining which type of interview would be
selected. For this process, I have utilized a semi structured interview. In selecting a semi
structured interview, I have created a series of questions that will be consistent across all
interviews. One of the advantages of utilizing a semi structured interview is that “although the
core questions are the same across participants, the interviewer may vary the additional probes
depending on responses”. (Henning and Roberts, 2016, p.170). While I have provided a set of
probing questions in the interview protocol, I have also allowed for room, for the questions
from each interview, to take the interview where it needs to go, in order to collect the most
Upon determining the interview approach and structure, I turned towards the interview
implementation and consideration for question order during this interview. It is imperative that
during the interview process a welcoming and safe environment is created for each
interviewee. The hope is that in doing so, creating such an environment will elicit more
vulnerable responses that will contribute to the overall data collected. In order to create this
environment, and according to Henning and Roberts (2016) “In regard to the question order,
3
INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
easier and noninvasive questions should be put first. Starting with low-risk questions helps
build rapport between the interviewer and interviewee” (Henning and Roberts, 2016, p. 173).
In addition to considering the question order, are the types of questions themselves. According
to Henning and Roberts (2016), Fraenkel, Wallen, and Hyun (2014) have suggested six types of
sensory. In the interview protocol above, each of these prompts have been utilized. The first
question in the interview protocol, focuses on background, which is used not only to “clarify the
environment (Henning and Roberts, 2016, p.171). In addition to a background question, I have
primarily utilized experience and opinion, values and feeling questions. These question prompts
get to the heart of the assessment, which is to determine how STARS mentors experience the
Resources
Henning, G. & Roberts, D. (2016). Student affairs assessment: Theory to practice. Sterling, VA:
Stylus