Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question # 1: The Feminist Perspective Argues That Since Its Origin, Sociology Has Highlighted
Question # 1: The Feminist Perspective Argues That Since Its Origin, Sociology Has Highlighted
Question # 1: The Feminist Perspective Argues That Since Its Origin, Sociology Has Highlighted
Subject: Sociology
Tutor: Mr Ashton
Class: 12K
Question # 1: The feminist perspective argues that since its origin, sociology has highlighted
the male view point while neglecting to incorporate the opinions and experiences of the
female population. Discuss three (3) feminist critiques levelled at the discipline of sociology.
(25 marks)
As one of the number of social sciences, sociology explains human behaviour and focuses
more on social groups rather than on individuals and less on biological differences as well.
Sociologists, therefore, places emphasis on the different ways in which social groups learn
general outlines as to how theorists view social patterns and the assumptions they make about
society and individuals. Each perspective provides sociologists with a different view of
social life and a starting point for viewing the world.”(Nasser Mustapha, 24). One such
group, is feminism. Feminism examines the ways in which gender operates within social
sociology argues that much of traditional sociology is the study of society from the man’s
point of view and by looking at it from a woman’s view point, a whole range of findings of
1
Whyte
traditional sociology are brought into question, and a set of new questions about the
and (re) presentation of women in literature and in society. For feminists, patriarchy has been
the dominant cause for gender inequality simply because men have been the arbiters of
political, economic and social discourse for centuries. Deeply imbedded in the critique of
feminists is the notion that women have been seen as socially inferior to men and as such
women are neglected to the patriarchy of discourse. Feminist critique of sociology have
sought to position women at the centre of the literary text discourse and political liberation by
criticism. Many feminists believe that much mainstream sociology, which they call “male
stream” sociology, has a masculine bias. Abbott et al (2005) identify the following ways in
More research has been conducted about men than women, and it has been
generalized to people in general, even when all-male samples have been used
Gender is often just added on to existing variable and is not seen as having the
perspective which argues that women are exploited by, and subservient to men. For radical
feminists, patriarchy is the main cause of gender inequality where women are subordinate
simply because men have more power. For many kinds of discourse in various societies the
males are usually the ones who function as kings, emperors, chiefs, and the head of the
household, the bread winner and the owner of property. Consequently, inequality exists
2
Whyte
between men and women because the males usually comprise the ruling class while women
are subjected to discrimination, violence, harassment- these are all methods utilized to keep
women subjugated.
Radical feminists explain the inequality in various ways, some seeing biology as the
cause, others seeing culture or male violence as more important. Radical feminists explain
the origin of gender inequality in a variety of ways. Firestone (1972) argues that the sexual
class system is the most fundamental form of stratification. The biological family results
from women being burdened by pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and menstruation. The
women become dependent on men, and power psychology develops, which maintains female
oppression. Furthermore, Millet (1970) believes that several factors are important in
Biology plays some part, through superior male strength and the use of violence
Ideological factors and socialization are important, as are sociological factors, such as
Women have a caste-like status which means that even higher-class women are
subordinate to men
Rape, sexual violence and the use of force underpin male power and dominance.
The third criticism which is levelled at sociology emanates from Marxist feminists who
sees capitalism rather than patriarchy as the principal source of women’s oppression.
Capitalism, for Marxists feminists, is the source of women’s oppression. It stresses the
importance of the exploitation of women as paid or unpaid workers. For Marxists feminists,
gender inequality had a materialist base as its origin. Gontz and Henderson, for example,
3
Whyte
argue that men became dominant due to the practice of ‘patrilocality’-a case where a wife
went to live with her husband’s family. This tended to mean that men gained control of
Marxist feminists also posit varying views as to how gender inequality is maintained:
Engels argues that men have retained power simply because of access to work, and
well-paid jobs. Gender inequalities will reduce, for Engells, if women gained greater
Marxist feminists such as Benstan (1972), argues that women are used as a “reserve
Finally, Marxist feminist such as Hartman (1981) argues that capitalism might create
lower-paid jobs and a reserve army of labour, but this does not explain why women
occupy these positions. For Hartman, patriarchy provides the key. Men, she argues,
maintain their control over women by exploiting their labour and denying them access
to jobs that pay a living wage, so that they stay dependent on their husbands.
Marxists feminists tend to argue that most democratic societies operate a capitalist market
driven system and women are the ones who are mostly at a disadvantage. Women for
example, are the ones who produce the children who form the labour force- the essential
ingredient to keep the capitalist society fully functional. The society also teaches and expects
women to be good home makers- they are therefore expected to be good and supportive
wives to their husbands. In this kind of classical conditioning technique, women are taught to
be passive and unwittingly continue the ideological conditioning of being subservient to men.
In Summary, Feminism has been critical of the ways in which traditional sociological
perspectives tend to elide, omit or just flatly relegate the voices, experiences and issues of
4
Whyte
concerns to women to the periphery of literary discourse. Ostensibly, Feminism has its own
set of criticism from post feminists such Brooks (1977) who argues that most feminists fail to
acknowledge the progress made by women. Marxists theorists also criticize feminists for
neglecting class inequalities. Postmodernists also argue that gender identities are no longer
fixed, inflexible and oppressive. Pollert (1996) attacks the use of the term “Patriarchy” as too
sweeping. However, despite the criticisms of Feminism, the theoretical perspectives from its
women in traditional sociological perspective, for feminists, was felt to be one of the most
important forms of ‘socialization,’ since it provided the role models which indicated to
women, and men, what constituted acceptable versions of the ‘feminine’ and legitimate
feminine goals and aspirations. As a theoretical approach, then, feminism has made a
substantial contribution to sociology and understanding society. Feminism has ensured that
critical discourse records the voices, experiences and perspectives of women in society and
5
Whyte
References:
Holborn, Martin et al. Sociology Themes and Perspectives, 7th Ed. London: Harper Collins
Publisher, 2009.
Moore, Stephen. Sociology Alive, 3rd Ed. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Ltd, 2001.
Mustapha, Nasser. Sociology for Caribbean Students, 3rd Ed. Kingston: Carlong Publishers,
2018.
Wilson, Pauline A. Kidd. Sociology GCSE For AQA. London: Harper Collins Publishers,
2008.