Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applying Foreign Ownership Restrictions On Mass Media To The Internet - Arvin Razon
Applying Foreign Ownership Restrictions On Mass Media To The Internet - Arvin Razon
OWNERSHIP
RESTRICTIONS ON
MASS MEDIA TO
THE INTERNET: A
TOOL FOR
ECONOMIC AND
POLITICAL
SUPPRESSION
By Arvin Kristopher Razon
Member, Philippine Bar
Lecturer and Associate
LLM (Melb)
OUTLINE
ECONOMIC SOCIOPOLITICAL
IMPACT IMPACT
Under the Philippine
Constitution, mass media is a
nationalised activity.
Mass media is defined by the Department of
Justice as 'any medium of communication
designed to reach the masses and that tends
to set the standards, ideals, and aims of the
masses.' The DOJ did not consider the
Internet as mass media.
TRANSFER OF
INWARD FLOW WAGE AND
OF CAPITAL KNOWLEDGE LIVING
INVESTMENT (SPILLOVER OF CONDITIONS
PRODUCTIVITY
KNOWLEDGE)
Maintaining the foreign ownership
limitation on mass media only favours a
few oligarchic interests, who use
protectionism as a tool to prevent
competition and retain their dominant
position and political influence.
REGULATIONS
LACK OF EVIDENCE (CONTENT
MARKET
REGARDING FORCES WILL QUOTAS,
DEAL WITH SUBSIDIES)
FOREIGN CAN ADDRESS
'FOREIGN
INFLUENCE INFLUENCE' 'FOREIGN
(NATURE OF CONCERNS INFLUENCE'
INTERNET) CONCERNS
DOES THE RECENTLY ISSUED
FOREIGN INVESTMENT NEGATIVE
LIST ADDRESS THIS CONCERN?
'No foreign equity is allowed for mass
media, except . . . Internet business.'
No.
(a) This does not change the characterisation of
the Internet as mass media.
(b) An executive order cannot make an
exception to the Constitution.
(c) Internet businesses refer to Internet access
providers.