Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fazaeli, R., (2006) - Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 84 (5), 812-818.
Fazaeli, R., (2006) - Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 84 (5), 812-818.
Fazaeli, R., (2006) - Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 84 (5), 812-818.
Abstract: Tosylation of some alcohols and phenols has been directly carried out with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride using
heterodoxy acids (H3PW12O40, H3PMo12O40, AlPW12O40, and AlPMo12O40) as catalysts in the absence of solvent. We
found that heteropoly acids AlPW12O40 and AlPMo12O40 were effective catalysts for the tosylation of alcohols and phe-
nols. In the case of aliphatic alcohols, secondary alcohols undergo tosylation chemoselectively in the presence of pri-
mary hydroxyl groups. This new method consistently has the advantage of excellent yields and short reaction time.
Key words: tosylation, p-TsCl, Keggin-type polyoxometalate, solvent-free reaction.
Résumé : La réaction de tosylation de quelques alcools et phénols a été réalisée directement par réaction avec du chlo-
rure de p-toluènesulfonyle en utilisant des acides hétérodoxes (H3PW12O40, H3PMo12O40, AlPW12O40 et AlPMo12O40)
comme catalyseurs, en l’absence de solvants. On a trouvé que les hétéropolyacides AlPW12O40 et AlPMo12O40 sont des
catalyseurs efficaces pour la tosylation des alcools et des phénols. Dans le cas des alcools aliphatiques, les alcools se-
condaires subissent une tosylation chimiosélective lorsqu’ils sont en présence de groupes hydroxyles primaires. Cette
nouvelle méthode présente les avantages d’excellents rendements et de temps de réaction courts.
Mots clés : tosylation, chlorure de p-tosyle, polyoxométallate de type Keggin, réaction sans solvant.
[Traduit par la Rédaction] Fazaeli et al. 818
Table 1. Results on the tosylation of different alcohols using some heteropoly acids.
Time Yield
Entry Substrate Product Type of POM (min) (%)a,b,c
a HO TsO HTP 20 45
HMP 27 50
AlTP 7 100
AlMP 9 95
N N
b OH OTs HTP 25 50
HMP 31 55
C CH3 C CH3 AlTP 8 100
AlMP 8 98
H H
c HTP 20 60
OH OTs
HMP 25 45
AlTP 15 98
NO2 NO2
AlMP 18 78
d OH
HTP 20 50
OTs
HMP 25 55
O2N
AlTP 10 90
O2N
AlMP 14 95
e HTP 21 60
OH OTs HMP 28 60
CH3 CH3 AlTP 5 92
O O
AlMP 7 95
f HTP 20 55
OH OTs HMP 35 60
H3C H3C AlTP 7 98
O O AlMP 7 92
g OTs HTP 20 60
OH
HMP 30 55
AlTP 10 98
AlMP 10 98
h OH OTs HTP 20 60
HMP 20 55
AlTP 10 98
AlMP 11 93
j HTP 20 65
CH2OH CH2OTs HMP 25 65
AlTP 10 90
AlMP 10 95
k OH OTs HTP 25 60
HMP 25 50
AlTP 7 98
AlMP 13 89
nitrobenzyl, 3-methoxybenzyl, 4-methoxybenzyl, and 1- Aliphatic alcohols were more easily tosylated than aromatic
phenylpropyl alcohol, were converted to the corresponding alcohols. However, long-chain alcohols, in the presence of
tosylates in 78%–100% yields (Table 1, entries b–h). Simi- AlPW12O40 or AlPW12O40 as catalyst, were converted to the
larly, allylic alcohols, such as cinnamyl and geraniol alco- desired products in moderate yields (Table 1, entries q–t,
hol, underwent tosylation to afford the corresponding 73%–80%). Cholesterol (Table 1, entry o), which is a more
tosylates in 90%–98% yields (Table 1, entries i and j). complex secondary alcohol, produced the tosylated product
Table 1. (continued).
Time Yield
Entry Substrate Product Type of POM (min) (%)a,b,c
l HTP 15 75
HMP 16 60
AlTP 9 96
OH OTs AlMP 9 90
m OH OTs HTP 20 65
HMP 20 50
AlTP 6 96
AlMP 9 90
n HTP 20 65
OH OTs HMP 25 65
AlTP 11 96
AlMP 17 90
o HTP 20 65
HMP 20 50
AlTP 6 96
AlMP 9 90
HO
TsO
OH OTs
n n
r n = 11 n = 11 HTP 50 50
HMP 50 50
AlTP 40 80
AlMP 48 75
s n = 13 n = 13 HTP 20 40
HMP 20 40
AlTP 11 75
AlMP 13 73
t n = 15 n = 15 HTP 55 45
HMP 60 40
AlTP 29 83
AlMP 48 75
H H
u HTP 60 65
HMP 20 55
H H AlTP 7 95
OH OTs AlMP 9 95
H
H
in high yield (90%–96%). Some phenols (Table 2) and ter- the case of diols, under the same reaction conditions, no
tiary alcohols (Table 1, entries u and v) undergo tosylation tosylate product was detected in the reaction mixture and
under the same experimental conditions. For aromatic alco- both hydroxyl groups remained intact in the presence of p-
hols, no rearranged or polymeric products were observed. In TsCl (Table 1, entries w–z).
Table 1 (concluded).
Time Yield
Entry Substrate Product Type of POM (min) (%)a,b,c
v HTP 40 60
OH OTs HMP 55 30
AlTP 15 80
AlMP 23 75
w OH OH HTP 120 0
HMP 120 0
No product AlTP 120 0
CH2CH3 AlMP 120 0
x HTP 120 0
HMP 120 0
CH2OH No product AlTP 120 0
AlMP 120 0
OH
y OH HTP 120 0
HMP 120 0
No product AlTP 120 0
AlMP 120 0
OH
z HTP 120 0
HMP 120 0
OH OH No product AlTP 120 0
AlMP 120 0
a
Substrate (1 mmol), p-TsCl (1.2 mmol), and POM (3 mol%) were ground together in a mortar with a pestle at room tempera-
ture for the appropriate time to form the tosylates.
b
Isolated yield.
c
Identification of the products was ascertained by NMR, IR, and mass spectrometric analysis.
Table 2. Results of the tosylation of different phenols using some heteropolyacids (polyoxometalates).
Time Yield
Entry Substrate Product Type of POM (min) (%)a,b,c
a OH OTs HTP 20 50
HMP 35 50
AlTP 10 85
AlMP 10 85
b OH OTs HTP 38 51
HMP 40 44
AlTP 5 90
AlMP 8 85
c OH OTs HTP 25 50
HMP 30 35
AlTP 5 98
CH3 CH3 AlMP 8 91
d OH OTs HTP 25 30
HMP 25 30
AlTP 8 95
AlMP 9 91
CH3 CH3
e OH OTs HTP 22 50
HMP 40 45
AlTP 10 90
H3C H3C AlMP 10 83
a
Substrate (1 mmol), p-TsCl (1.2 mmol), and POM (3 mol%) were ground together in a mortar with a pestle at room temperature
for the appropriate time to form the tosylates.
b
Isolated yield.
c
Identification of the products was ascertained by NMR, IR, and mass spectrometric analysis.
Scheme 2.
OH OTs
trace
+ 1.2 mol% p-TsCl +
3 mol % AlTP
OH OTs
Solvent-free, r.t.
(10 min) 98%
Table 3. Tosylation of cyclohexanol with p-TsCl in the presence of AlPW12O40 in various solvents.
OH OTs
3 mol % AlTP
p-TsCl
Solvent
Entry Solvent GC yield (%) after 6 min GC yield (%) after 30 min
1 CHCl3 20 50
2 CH3CN 35 65
3 CH2Cl2 10 35
4 Acetone 25 50
5 EtOH 15 35
Note: Reaction conditions: cyclohexanol (1 mmol), p-TsCl (1.2 mmol), AlPW12O40 (3 mol%), and reflux.
Table 4. Tosylation of cyclohexanol with p-TsCl in the presence of AlPMo12O40 in various solvents.
OH OTs
3 mol % AlMP
p-TsCl
Solvent
Entry Solvent GC yield (%) after 9 min GC yield (%) after 30 min
1 CHCl3 20 30
2 CH3CN 35 50
3 CH2Cl2 10 35
4 Acetone 15 35
5 EtOH 20 35
Note: Reaction conditions: cyclohexanol (1 mmol), p-TsCl (1.2 mmol), AlPMo12O40 (3 mol%), and reflux.
In the case of the aliphatic alcohols, secondary alcohols studies clearly reveal that this methodology can be applied
were tosylated much faster compared with primary hydroxyl for the chemoselective direct tosylation of aliphatic second-
groups (Table 1, entries k–t). Thus, a secondary alcohol can ary alcohols in the presence of primary hydroxyl groups.
be tosylated chemoselectively in the presence of a primary
alcohol, as previously reported in the case of CoCl2·6H2O Effect of solvent
(8) and silica chloride (9). The tosylation of cyclohexanol was also conducted in dif-
The difference in reaction rates between primary and sec- ferent solvents (chloroform, acetonitrile, dichloromethane,
ondary alcohols, which is observed in Table 1, prompted us acetone, and ethanol). The results show that the yield of the
to examine the chemoselective tosylation of alcohols. For reaction in solutions is much less than those observed under
example, when a mixture of n-hexanol and cyclohexanol was solvent-free conditions (Tables 3 and 4).
allowed to react with 0.5 equiv. p-TsCl in the presence of
these catalysts for 10 min, cyclohexanol underwent Effect of the catalyst
tosylation chemoselectively in 98% yield and only a trace Amongst the catalysts used (H3PW12O40, H3PMo12O40,
amount of n-hexyl tosylate was detected (Scheme 2). These AlPW12O40, and AlPMo12O40) in the tosylation of alcohols
© 2006 NRC Canada
818 Can. J. Chem. Vol. 84, 2006
and phenols, it was found that both AlPW12O40 and Epsztein. Synthesis, 706 (1977); (c) H. Kotsuki, T. Oshisi, and
AlPMo12O40 were effective catalysts for the tosylation of M. Inoue. Synlett, 255 (1988).
alcohols and phenols. The results showed that in the absence 3. (a) K. Kurita. Chem. Ind. (London), 345 (1974); (b) G.W.
Kabalka, M. Varma, R.S. Varma, P.C. Srivastava, and F.F.
of the catalysts, the tosylation reaction did not proceed after
Knapp, Jr. J. Org. Chem. 51, 2386 (1986); (c) Y. Yoshida, Y.
30 min at room temperature, but in the presence of two
Sakakura, N. Aso, S. Okada, and Y. Tanabe. Tetrahedron, 55,
heteropolyacids (AlPW12O40 and AlPMo12O40), the conver- 2183 (1999); (d) J. Hartung, S. Hunig, R. Kueuer, M. Schwarz,
sion proceeded efficiently in a few minutes under similar re- and H. Wenner, Synthesis, 1433 (1997).
action conditions (Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, we chose 4. (a) V.C. Sekera and C.S. Marvel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 345
AlPW12O40 and AlPMo12O40 which are heterogeneous and (1933); (b) R.S. Tipson. J. Org. Chem. 9, 235 (1944).
environmentally benign compounds, as catalysts for further 5. (a) Y. Nitta and Y. Arakawa. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 33, 1380
tosylation studies. Furthermore, the use of just 3 mol% POM (1985); (b) R. Karaman, H. Leader, A. Goldblum, and E.
is sufficient to promote the reaction and no other additives Breuer. Chem. Ind. (London), 857 (1987); (c) D. Klamann,
are required for this conversion. No improvements were ob- and P. Weyerstahl. Chem. Ber. 98, 2070 (1965); (d) T.
served in the reaction yields by increasing the amount of Mukaiyama and K. Hojo. Chem. Lett. 893 (1976).
POM from 3 to 5 mol%. 6. (a) J.F. O’Connell and H.J. Rapoport. J. Org. Chem. 57, 4775
(1992); (b) A.R. Katritzky, G. Zhang, and J. Wu. Synth.
Commun. 24, 205 (1994).
Conclusions 7. B.M. Choudary, N.S. Chowdari, and M.L. Kantam. Tetrahe-
dron, 56, 7291 (2000).
In this study, we have introduced aluminum dodecatung- 8. S. Velusamy, J.S.K. Kumar, and T. Punniyamurthy. Tetrahe-
stophosphate (AlPW12O40) and aluminium dodecamolybdo- dron Lett. 45, 203 (2004).
phosphate (AlPMo12O40) as new, highly effective, 9. B. Das, V.S. Reddy, and R. Reddy. Tetrahedron Lett. 45, 6717
nonhygroscopic, noncorrosive, heterogeneous, and environ- (2004).
mentally benign catalysts for the efficient tosylation of a va- 10. B. Das and V.S. Reddy. Chem. Lett. 33, 11 (2004).
riety of alcohols and phenols in high yields. Phenols and 11. (a) J.G. Smith. Synthesis, 629 (1984); (b) R. Oi and K.B.
primary, secondary, benzylic, and allylic alcohols gave Sharpless. Tetrahedron Lett. 33, 2095 (1992).
tosylated products in good yields. In the case of aliphatic al- 12. I. Kozhevnikov. Catalysts for fine chemical synthesis. Cataly-
cohols, secondary alcohols are transformed to the corre- sis by polyoxometalates. Vol. 2. Wiley, NewYork. 2002.
sponding tosylates chemoselectively in the presence of the 13. C.S.Turchi and D.F. Ollis. J. Catal. 122, 178 (1990).
primaryhydroxy groups. The advantages of the present meth- 14. A. Mylonas and E. Papaconstantantinou. J. Mol. Catal. 92, 261
ods may be summarized as: high stereoselectivities, good (1994).
yields of the desired products, short reaction times, mild and 15. U. Stafford, K.A. Gray, and P.V. Kamat. J. Catal. 167, 25
solvent-free conditions, and simple experimental procedure (1997).
16. C. Hu, B. Yue, and T. Yamase. Appl. Catal. A, 194, 99 (2000).
and product isolation. The only disadvantage of this system
17. T. Okuhara, H. Watanabe, T. Nishimura, K. Lnumaru, and M.
is the release of HCl as a by-product. We feel our protocol is
Misono. Chem. Mater. 12, 2230 (2000).
an attractive alternative to the existing procedures for 18. M. Misono. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge), 13, 1141 (2001).
tosylation of alcohols and phenols. 19. T. Okuhara. Chem. Rev. 102, 3641 (2002).
20. H. Hayashi and J.B. Moffat. Talanta, 29, 943 (1982).
21. (a) T. Baba, J. Sakai, and Y. Ono. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 55,
Acknowledgment 2657 (1982); (b) T. Baba, H. Watanabe, and Y. Ono. J. Phys.
Chem. 87, 2406 (1983).
We gratefully thank Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran, for
22. (a) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, and K. Amani. Green Chem.
financial support.
3, 131 (2000); (b) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, and K. Amani.
Synthesis, 59 (2002); (c) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, K.
Amani, and F. Nowrouzi. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2601
References (2002); (d) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, and K. Amani. Syn-
1. T.W. Green and P.G.M. Wuts. Protective groups in organic thesis, 408 (2003).
synthesis. 3rd ed. Wiley, New York. 1999. 23. H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, F. Nowrouzi, and K. Amani.
2. (a) R.A. Adlington, A.G.M. Barrett, P. Quayle, and A. Walker. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge), 764 (2003).
J. Chem. Commun. 404 (1981); (b) S. Holand, and R. 24. T.H. Chang. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91, 375 (1995).