Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEBI - Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI - Securities and Exchange Board of India
Structure of SEBI
SEBI has a corporate framework comprising various departments each managed by a
department head. There are about 20+ departments under SEBI. Some of these departments
are corporation finance, economic and policy analysis, debt and hybrid securities,
enforcement, human resources, investment management, commodity derivatives market
regulation, legal affairs, and more.
SEBI has to be responsive to the needs of three groups, which constitute the market:
issuers of securities
investors
market intermediaries
SEBI has three functions rolled into one body: quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial and quasi-
executive. It drafts regulations in its legislative capacity, it conducts investigation and
enforcement action in its executive function and it passes rulings and orders in its judicial
capacity. Though this makes it very powerful, there is an appeal process to create
accountability. There is a Securities Appellate Tribunal which is a three-member tribunal and
is currently headed by Justice Tarun Agarwala, former Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High
Court. A second appeal lies directly to the Supreme Court. SEBI has taken a very proactive
role in streamlining disclosure requirements to international standards.
Powers
For the discharge of its functions efficiently, SEBI has been vested with the following
powers:
♦ SEBI committees
Authority of SEBI
The SEBI has three main powers:
i. Quasi-Judicial: SEBI has the authority to deliver judgements related to fraud and other
unethical practices in terms of the securities market. This helps to ensure fairness,
transparency, and accountability in the securities market.
iii. Quasi-Legislative: SEBI reserves the right to frame rules and regulations to protect the
interests of the investors. Some of its regulations consist of insider trading regulations, listing
obligation, and disclosure requirements. These have been formulated to keep malpractices at
bay.
Despite the powers, the results of SEBI’s functions still have to go through the Securities
Appellate Tribunal and the Supreme Court of India.
Some of the regulations for mutual funds laid down by SEBI are:
1. A sponsor of a mutual fund, an associate or a group company, which includes the asset
management company of a fund, through the schemes of the mutual fund in any form cannot
hold:
(a)10% or more of the shareholding and voting rights in the asset management company or
any other mutual fund.
(b)An asset management company cannot have representation on a board of any other mutual
fund.
2. A shareholder cannot hold 10% or more of the shareholding directly or indirectly in the asset
management company of a mutual fund.
3. No single stock can have more than 35% weight in the index for a sectoral or thematic index;
the cap is 25% for other indices.
4. The cumulative weight of the top three constituents of the index cannot exceed 65%.
5. An individual constituent of the index should have a trading frequency of a minimum of 80%.
6. Funds must evaluate and ensure compliance to the norms at the end of every calendar quarter.
The constituents of the indices must be made public by publishing it on their website.
7. New funds must submit their compliance status to SEBI before being launched.
8. All liquid schemes must hold a minimum of 20% in liquid assets such as government
securities (G-Secs), repo on G-Secs, cash, and treasury bills.
9. A debt mutual fund can invest up to only 20% of its assets in one sector; previously the cap
was 25%. The additional exposure to housing finance companies (HFCs) is updated to 15%
from 10% and a 5% exposure on securitised debt based on retail housing loan and affordable
housing loan portfolios.
10. As per SEBI’s recommendation, the amortisation is not the only method for evaluating debt
and money market instruments. The market-to-market methodology is also used.
11. An exit penalty will be levied on investors of liquid schemes who exit the scheme within a
period of seven days.
12. Mutual funds schemes must invest only in the listed non-convertible debentures (NCD). Any
fresh investment in commercial papers (CPs) and equity shares are allowed in listed securities
as per the guidelines issued by the regulator.
13. Liquid and overnight schemes are no longer allowed to invest in short-term deposits, debt,
and money market instruments that have structured obligations or credit enhancements.
14. When investing in debt securities having credit enhancements, a minimum of four times
security cover is mandatory for investing in mutual funds schemes. A prudential limit of 10%
is prescribed on total investment by such schemes in debt and money market instruments.
The firm must be established as a separate AMC to offer mutual funds. The net worth of such
parent firm or AMC must be Rs.50,000,000. Mutual funds dealing exclusively with money
markets must register with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI); all other mutual funds must
register with SEBI. Recently, a self-regulation agency for mutual funds has been set up called
Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI).
The AMFI is focused on developing the Indian mutual fund industry with professional and
ethical qualities. The AMFI aims to enhance the operational standards in all areas with a view
to protect and promote mutual funds and its stakeholders.
Till date, there are 44 Asset Management Companies that are registered with SEBI and are
members of AMFI. Some of them are Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited, BNP Paribas
Asset Management India Private Limited, Edelweiss Asset Management Limited, and Quant
Money Managers Limited.
A sponsor of a mutual fund scheme, a group of the company or an associate, which involves
AMC of the fund, cannot hold the following in any form:
10% or above of the voting rights and shareholding in the AMC or any other mutual
fund scheme.
An AMC cannot have representation on the board of any other mutual fund.
Shareholders can’t hold more than 10% of the shares both directly and indirectly in
AMC of the mutual fund.
Funds must be named based on the core intent of the fund and asset mix. It should
specify the risk associated clearly.
SEBI has suggested 16 for debt funds, 10 classifications for equity funds, 6 classifications for
hybrid, 2 for solution funds, and 2 for index funds.
SEBI has reclassified large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap based on market cap relative
rankings rather than absolute market cap cut-offs.
The debt fund classification is prescribed based on the duration of the fund and the asset
quality mix.
All categories except index funds can only have one fund per classification, i.e. an AMC can
have a maximum of 34 funds other than index funds.
Major Achievements
SEBI has enjoyed success as a regulator by pushing systematic reforms aggressively and
successively. SEBI is credited for quick movement towards making the markets electronic
and paperless by introducing T+5 rolling cycle from July 2001 and T+3 in April 2002 and
further to T+2 in April 2003. The rolling cycle of T+2 means, Settlement is done in 2 days
after Trade date. SEBI has been active in setting up the regulations as required under law.
SEBI did away with physical certificates that were prone to postal delays, theft and forgery,
apart from making the settlement process slow and cumbersome by passing Depositories Act,
1996.
SEBI has also been instrumental in taking quick and effective steps in light of the global
meltdown and the Satyam fiasco. In October 2011, it increased the extent and quantity of
disclosures to be made by Indian corporate promoters. In light of the global meltdown, it
liberalised the takeover code to facilitate investments by removing regulatory structures. In
one such move, SEBI has increased the application limit for retail investors to ₹ 2 lakh, from
₹ 1 lakh at present.
Controversies
Supreme Court of India heard a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by India Rejuvenation
Initiative that had challenged the procedure for key appointments adopted by Govt of India. The
petition alleged that, "The constitution of the search-cum-selection committee for recommending
the name of chairman and every whole-time members of SEBI for appointment has been altered,
which directly impacted its balance and could compromise the role of the SEBI as a
watchdog." On 21 November 2011, the court allowed petitioners to withdraw the petition and file
a fresh petition pointing out constitutional issues regarding appointments of regulators and their
independence. The Chief Justice of India refused the finance ministry's request to dismiss
the PIL and said that the court was well aware of what was going on in SEBI. Hearing a similar
petition filed by Bengaluru-based advocate Anil Kumar Agarwal, a two judge Supreme Court
bench of Justice SS Nijjar and Justice HL Gokhale issued a notice to the Govt of India, SEBI
chief UK Sinha and Omita Paul, Secretary to the President of India.
Further, it came into light that Dr KM Abraham (the then whole time member of SEBI Board) had
written to the Prime Minister about malaise in SEBI. He said, "The regulatory institution is under
duress and under severe attack from powerful corporate interests operating concertedly to
undermine SEBI". He specifically said that Finance Minister's office, and especially his advisor
Omita Paul, were trying to influence many cases before SEBI, including those relating to Sahara
Group, Reliance, Bank of Rajasthan and MCX.