Skating Speed: A Statistical Approach To Modelling

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

A Statistical Approach to

Modelling Skating Speed

Vicki Bendus, MSc, CSCS

Lead Sport Performance Coach


Hockey & Soccer
Brock University

Lead S&C Coach


National Women’s Development Team
Hockey Canada
On Ice Assessments

What is speed?

Physical & Technical

How is it produced?

Game Analysis

How is it used?
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Identify & Hypothesize Longitudinal Trends Transfer of Training

Can we predict on ice speed from off ice Do the off ice KPIs trend with skating Does improving the off ice KPIs
metrics? speed? transfer to on ice speed?
Mean SD Min Max

N = 42 ICE 0-10m (s) 1.999 0.139 1.772 2.266

ICE 20-30m (s) 1.188 0.089 1.042 1.380


24 Men
18 Women ICE 0-30m (s) 4.542 0.314 4.058 5.129

Jump Height (m) 0.344 0.073 0.232 0.500


How accurately can we predict 30m skating time from a CMJ test?
CMJ Force−Time Trace
3000

2000
Force (N)

1000

0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Time (s)
BRAKING Trace PROPULSIVE ADDITIONAL
CMJ Force−Time
3000 Avg. Braking Force Avg. Propulsive Force Impulse Ratio
Avg. Braking Power Avg. Propulsive Power Jump Height
Avg. Braking Velocity Avg. Propulsive Velocity mRSI
Avg. Relative Braking Force Avg. Relative Propulsive Force Stiffness
Avg. Relative Braking Power Avg. Relative Propulsive Power System Weight
Braking Impulse Peak Propulsive Force Takeoff Velocity
Braking Net Impulse Peak Propulsive Power Time to Takeoff
Braking Phase Peak Relative Propulsive Force
Braking RFD Peak Relative Propulsive Power
Peak Braking Force Positive Impulse
Peak Relative Braking Force Positive Net Impulse *EXCLUDED
2000 Peak Relative Braking Power Propulsive Impulse
Propulsive Net Impulse Landing Metrics
L / R Metrics
Relative Braking Impulse
Relative Braking Net Impulse Propulsive Phase
Relative Propulsive Impulse
Force (N)

Relative Propulsive Net Impulse

UNWEIGHTING 38 Initial Inputs


Unweighting Phase

1000

0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Time (s)
Training Data Testing Data

Separate Create Test


datasets model model

Linear Regression

Model LASSO

K-fold Cross Validation


BRAKING Trace PROPULSIVE ADDITIONAL
CMJ Force−Time
3000 Avg. Braking Force Avg. Propulsive Force Impulse Ratio
Avg. Braking Power Avg. Propulsive Power Jump Height
Avg. Braking Velocity Avg. Propulsive Velocity mRSI
Avg. Relative Braking Force Avg. Relative Propulsive Force Stiffness
Avg. Relative Braking Power Avg. Relative Propulsive Power System Weight
Braking Impulse Peak Propulsive Force Takeoff Velocity
Braking Net Impulse Peak Propulsive Power Time to Takeoff
Braking Phase Peak Relative Propulsive Force
Braking RFD Peak Relative Propulsive Power
Peak Braking Force Positive Impulse
Peak Relative Braking Force Positive Net Impulse *EXCLUDED
2000 Peak Relative Braking Power Propulsive Impulse
Propulsive Net Impulse Landing Metrics
L / R Metrics
Relative Braking Impulse
Relative Braking Net Impulse Propulsive Phase
Relative Propulsive Impulse
Force (N)

Relative Propulsive Net Impulse

UNWEIGHTING 38 Initial Inputs


Unweighting Phase

1000

0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Time (s)
BRAKING Trace PROPULSIVE ADDITIONAL
CMJ Force−Time
3000 Avg. Braking Force Avg. Propulsive Force Impulse Ratio
Avg. Braking Power Avg. Propulsive Power Jump Height
Avg. Braking Velocity Avg. Propulsive Velocity mRSI
Avg. Relative Braking Force Avg. Relative Propulsive Force Stiffness
Avg. Relative Braking Power Avg. Relative Propulsive Power System Weight
Braking Impulse Peak Propulsive Force Takeoff Velocity
Braking Net Impulse Peak Propulsive Power Time to Takeoff
Braking Phase Peak Relative Propulsive Force
Braking RFD Peak Relative Propulsive Power
Peak Braking Force Positive Impulse
Peak Relative Braking Force Positive Net Impulse EXCLUDED
2000 Peak Relative Braking Power Propulsive Impulse
Relative Braking Impulse Propulsive Net Impulse
Relative Braking Net Impulse Propulsive Phase
Relative Propulsive Impulse
Force (N)

Relative Propulsive Net Impulse

UNWEIGHTING 4 Final Inputs

1000

0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Time (s)
Testing Data
Predicted vs Actual: Linear Regression with k−Fold Cross Validation
Predicted vs Actual Skate Times

5.0
(s)

4.8
Times
Times (s)

4.6
Skate
Actual Skate
Actual

4.4

R2 = 73%
Error = 0.147s
4.2

4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0


Predicted Skate Times (s)
Predicted Skate Times (s)
Testing Data
Model Coefficients Model Coefficients

Propulsive Impulse Propulsive Impulse

Propulsive Net Impulse Propulsive Net Impulse


Input

Impulse Ratio Impulse Ratio

Takeoff Velocity Takeoff Velocity

−0.20 −0.15 −0.10 −0.05 0.00


Coefficient
Coefficients
APPLICATION
&NEXT STEPS

vickibendus@gmail.com

You might also like