Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Material, Fabrication Welding and ECA: 6-Sep-18 Dasharatha Achani
Material, Fabrication Welding and ECA: 6-Sep-18 Dasharatha Achani
Material, Fabrication Welding and ECA: 6-Sep-18 Dasharatha Achani
Eng. Solutions
Material,
fabrication
welding and ECA
6-Sep-18
6-Sep-18 Page 1 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions
Local buckling
Ovalising
Ductile crack growth
Plastic deformation
R = 7.5m
Elastic deformation
2. Material properties
3. ECA inputs
4. Crackwise
5. Crackwise output
Why
Determine an acceptance criteria for pipeline welds
When
Once the pipe geometry and loads are defined
Who
SINTEF, EXOVA, DNV, TWI etc.
What
Data supplied by Installation Contractor, material properties from testing
Crackwise
LINKpipe
Pipeline lifecycle
Reeling
Drum diameter
Coating thickness
Aligner radius
Pipe geometry
Installation
Sea state
Hold time
Distance between weld and clamp
Operation
Vortex Induced Vibration
Shut downs
Trawl impacts
Convert this to stresses
End of life
BS7910
Basis for ECAs using Crackwise
Used as a reference by DNV-OS-F101
Available material properties
Depend on how extensive the testing was
Assessment levels
Level 1: simplified assessment method applicable when the information on
materials properties is limited
Level 2: normal assessment route
Installation, operational stresses
Level 3: appropriate for ductile materials and enables a tearing resistance
analysis to be performed
Reeling
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
Sublevels
A, general assumption
B, tensile material specific
C, Finite Element based
Industry ECAs are usually Level 2B and Level 3B
Testing
Tensile properties
Tensile testing of parent metal
All Weld Tests
Notched Cross Weld Tests
Elastic modulus, Ultimate tensile strength, Yield strength
Toughness
SENT (Closer to pipe loading, demonstrated by FE)
SENB
Impact (Charpy)
Stress intensity factor (K), CTOD, J-R curve
Specimen condition
As received => reeling on
Strained => reeling off & installation
Strained and Aged => operational loads
Testing, SENT
Testing, SENT
Crack observation
Pre Crack a0
Tearing Δa
Testing, SENT
SENT Results
Factors
Factors
Neuber’s rule
2 2 1 1 SCF 2
Applies to plastic strain
Primary bending stress
Material characteristics
Bauschinger effect
Steel’s “Memory”
Tensile properties are affected by the plastic deformation
Lüder’s plateau in carbon steels
Material characteristics
Toughness
SENT testing
J-R curve
CTOD-R curve
Offset power law type 2
y 0,796x 0,585
KI
Kr
K mat
ref
Lr
y
Reeling
Convert the strains to stresses
Neuber’s Rule
Installation
Adapt the stress spectra to the Crackwise format:
Bending stress (SCF)
Membrane stress
Number of cycles
Operation
Bending stress (SCF)
Membrane stress
Number of cycles
Unsafe
Safe
Unsafe
Acceptable Flaw, crack
will arrest
Safe
”Safe” zone
750
Flaw length (mm)
600
450 Mainline
Tie-in
300
Full Pen repair
150
0
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Flaw Height (mm)
Results
Acceptance criteria
Plot Critical Crack Size
As evaluated during ininitial analysis
Length vs Depth
and / or agreed with client..
Evaluate
Is acceptance
No Challenge Acceptance Criteria
criteria within
Evaluate Safety Margin
critical crack
size?
Discuss possible route with client
Yes
Thank you