CORAZON E.

UNABIA MAED-AS EDUC 606

Evaluation Tool/Questionnaire

School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Part I: Personal Data

Direction: Provide pertinent information on the items below by checking the appropriate blanks and /or
supplying the answer on the blanks.
Name: (Optional)
Age: (____) 30 and below
(____) 31 – 35
(____) 36- 40
(____) 41- 45
(____) 46 – 50
(____) 51 and above
Major: __________
Teaching Position: (____)T1 (____)T3
(____)T2 (____) MT1
Teaching Experience: ___________
Educational Attainment:
BEEd degree _____
BEEd with MA Units _____
MA degree _____
Others; please specify ________

Part II: Assessment of the School Improvement of Tawog Elementary School.

Direction: Rate the School Improvement Plan by using the following criteria below. Put a check mark on
the column that corresponds to your rating.

Legend: 5- Excellent
4- Above Average
3- Average
2- Below Average
1- Poor

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
A. CONTENT
1. The School Improvement Plan is aligned and anchored on the Vision,
Mission and Core Values.
2. The Vision, Mission and Core Values is well established and presented.
3. The school and community profile are well defined and appropriate to the
current situation of the school.
4. The school and community profile is comprehensive and data driven.
5. Sufficient data are provided to clarify points in the school community data
template.
B. ORGANIZATION
1. The organizational structures appropriate for the genre and very effective.
2. Informations are correctly outlined, thus improving the organization of the
SIP.
3. Cohesive used of informations are effectively used.
4. The flow of ideas is smooth and the information is easy to read and
understand.
5. The SIP is sufficiently provides practical implication of the school’s concern,
issues, gaps and problems (CIGP).
C. STYLE AND STRUCTURES
1. The SIP showcases the teachers and stakeholder’s voice.
2. The SIP uses language that are appropriate to context.
3. The SIP eliminates wordiness and ambiguity.
4. The SIP uses a variety of sentence structures.
5. The SIP uses icons, graphical structures and pictures to provide presentable
informations.
D. GRAMMAR AND MECHANICS
1. The SIP output observes the grammatical convention in standard English.
2. Correct spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are observed.
3. Word choice used is appropriate.
4. Sentenced are well structured.
5. The key points of SIP explains the content clearly and are covered.
 Table 1
Profile of the Respondents
N=14
1.1 Age
Age Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
30 and below 2 14.29
31 - 35 4 28.57
36- 40 3 21.43
41- 45 2 14.29
46- 50 1 7.14
51 and above 2 14.29
Total 14 100

As shown in the table 1.1, there were 4 out of 14 or 28.57% ages 31 - 40, 3 out of 14 or 21.43%
ages ranges 36-40 years old, 2 out 14 or 14.29% who are at the age brackets 30years old and below,
41- 45 years old and 51years old and above respectively. There is only 1 out of 14 or 7.14% who is at
the age brackets 46-50 year old. The table further revealed that majority of the respondents landed at
the age brackets 31-35 years old.

1.2 Major
Major Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
Gen- Ed 8 57.14
English 1 7.14
Math 4 28.58
Industrial Art 1 7.14
Total 14 100

As shown in the table 1.2, there were 8 out of 14 or 57.14% of the respondents took up the
course Gen-Ed., 4 out of 14 or 28.58% were Math Major and 1 out of 14 or 7.14% were English and
Industrial Art Major. The table further shown that majority of the respondents were Gen. Ed. Teachers.

1.3 Teaching Position

Teaching Position Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
T1 9 64.29
T2 3 21.43
T3 1 7.14
M1 1 7.14
Total 14 100

As reflected in the table 1.3 teaching position, 9 out of 14 or 64.29% were T1, 3 out of 14 or
21.43% were T1 and 1 out of 14 or 7.14% were both T3 and M1 respectively. This implies that majority
of the teachers of Tawog Elementary School were Teacher 1.
1.4 Teaching Expereince
Teaching Experience Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
1- 5 years 5 35.71
6- 10 years 5 35.71
11 years and above 4 28.58
Total 14 100

As shown in table 1.4, there were 5 out of 14 or 35.71% of the teachers had 1- 5 and 6-10 years
of teaching experience, 4 out of 14 or 28.58% has a teaching experience of 11 year and above.

1.5 Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
BEEd 8 57.14
BEEd with masters unit. 5 35.72
MA degree 1 7.14
Total 14 100

As shown in table 1.5, 8 out of 14 or 57.14 were BEEd, 5 out of 14 or 35.725 were BEEd with
master’s unit and only 1 out of 14 or 7.14% was MA degree. This implies that majority of the
respondents were Bachelor of Elementary Education degree holders.

Table 2
Assessment of School Improvement Plan (SIP) as to the Content

Content Weighte Verbal

d Intepretation
Mean
1. The School Improvement Plan is aligned and anchored on the Vision, 4.3 Above average
Mission and Core Values.
2. The Vision, Mission and Core Values is well established and presented. 4.2 Above average
3. The school and community profile are well defined and appropriate to 4.42 Above average
the current situation of the school.
4. The school and community profile is comprehensive and data driven. 3.98 Above average
5. Sufficient data are provided to clarify points in the school community 4.1 Above average
data template.
Total Average Weighted Mean 4.2 Above average

As shown in the table, “The school and community profile are well defined and appropriate to the
current situation of the school” has the highest weighted mean of 4.42 which interpreted Above avergae
while “The school and community profile is comprehensive and data driven” has the lowest weighted
mean of 3.98, however it was interpreted Above average also. The overall average weighted mean of the
variabke is 4.2 which interpreted Above average. This implies that the School Improvement Plan are
really appropriate to the needs of the school and the community.

Table 3
Assessment of School Improvement Plan (SIP) as to the Organization

Organization Weighte Verbal

d Intepretation
Mean
1. The organizational structures appropriate for the genre and very 4.19 Above average
effective.
2. Informations are correctly outlined, thus improving the organization of 4.35 Above average
the SIP.
3. Cohesive used of informations are effectively used. 3.89 Above average
4. The flow of ideas is smooth and the information is easy to read and 4.24 Above average
understand.
5. The SIP is sufficiently provides practical implication of the school’s 4.5 Above average
concern, issues, gaps and problems (CIGP).
Total Average Weighted Mean 4.234 Above average

As shown in table 3, “The SIP is sufficiently provides practical implication of the school’s concern,
issues, gaps and problems (CIGP)” has the highest weighted mean of 4.5 and “Cohesive used of
informations are effectively used” has the lowest weighted mean of 3.89 in which both interpreted Above
average. The overall average weighted mean of the variable is 4.234 which interpreted Above average.
This implies that the school Improvemnt Plan (SIP) real;y helps in addressing the CIGPs of the school.

Table 4
Assessment of School Improvement Plan (SIP) as to Style/ Structures

Style and Structures Weighted Verbal

Mean Intepretation

1. The SIP showcases the teachers and stakeholder’s voice. 4.34 Above average
2. The SIP uses language that are appropriate to context. 4.10 Above average
3. The SIP eliminates wordiness and ambiguity. 3.92 Above average
4. The SIP uses a variety of sentence structures. 4.06 Above average
5. The SIP uses icons, graphical structures and pictures to provide 4.56 Above average
presentable informations.
Total Average Weighted Mean 4.20 Above average

As shown in table 4, “The SIP uses icons, graphical structures and pictures to provide
presentable informations” has highest weighted mean of 4.56 while “The SIP eliminates wordiness and
ambiguity” has the lowest weighted mean of 3.92 and were both interpreted Above average. The total
average weighted mean of the variable is 4.20 which will be interpreted Above average. This implies that
the structures and style used in the School Improvement Plan provides clear understanding and
information.
 Table 5
Assessment of School Improvement Plan (SIP) as to Grammar and Mechanics

Grammar and Mechanics Weighte Verbal

d Intepretation
Mean
1. The SIP output observes the grammatical convention in standard 4.15 Above average
English.
2. Correct spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are observed. 4.3 Above average
3. Word choice used is appropriate. 4.36 Above average
4. Sentenced are well structured. 4.1 Above average
5. The key points of SIP explains the content clearly and are covered. 4.6 Above average
Total Average Weighted Mean 4.30 Above average

The table 5 has shown that “The key points of SIP explains the content clearly and are covered”
has the highest weighted mean of 4.6 while “ Sentenced are well structured” has the lowest weighted
mean of 4.1 and were interpreted Above average. The variable has the total average weighted mean of
4.30 which interpreted Above average. The table implies that the School Improvment Plan has a very
concise and clear usage of the grammar for easily understanding of the teachers and stakeholders.