Economic consequences of Tinder Matrimonial web sites in today s world

Online dating apps have been accused of killing romance, but their effects on
society are deeper than originally thought. They may not be so bad after all.
Online dating is the second most popular way to meet partners for heterosexual
couples and, by far, the most popular form of dating for homosexual partners. Those
unions could also lead to a more harmonious society, the study from Ortega and
Hergovich found. The researchers created more than 10,000 simulations of randomly
generated societies and added social connections to them. When connections were
made between just a few people of different races, “complete racial integration” would
be almost inevitable, meaning that the majority of couples would be interracial. A rise
of interracial couples can alleviate prejudice and racism in society, studies show, and
usher in a multiracial future.
The word “economics” comes from the Greek word “oikonomia.” It means
“management of the household.” Unfortunately, few people seem to notice the
relationship between household family structure and economic outcomes for states or
society at-large. According to a study commissioned by The American Enterprise
Institute, shifts in marriage and family structure significantly affect a state’s economy.
This includes its economic growth and mobility, child poverty and median family
income. That s why the countries have a big interest to bring people together and
create family, even by using online dating app.
Written by Jay Zagorsky, the report, Marriage and Divorce’s Impact on Wealth
found that the wealth of married respondents increased by around 14 percent for each
year they were wed. “Compared to being single, married people almost doubled their
wealth, increasing it over 93 percent,” said Zagorsky. There are three some reasons
that explain this considerable difference. The first relates to savings – married couples
save more, as thinking and living as a unit, so to speak, is more conducive to long-term
financial planning.
As Zagorsky explained: “Married people are more likely to buy homes or make other
investments together than people who are co-habiting.”
Also, violent crime is much less common in states with more married-parent
families, even after controlling for several socio-demographic factors. High crime rates
lower the quality of life and real living standards. Crime is also associated with lower
levels of economic growth and mobility.
On the other hand, Tinder is Making Economic Inequality Worse. In theory, apps
like Tinder offer us the chance to expand our networks beyond our campuses,
workplaces, and wherever else we meet people who are socioeconomically similar.
But in practice, not so much. In fact, it becomes quickly obvious that, regardless of the
app or website in question, users pair off within social strata.
If I would be a manager of Tinder I would work to make it better to avoid some
risk such as becoming a victim, lost trust, lose contact to the real world. I would create
questionnaires to find out what people are asking for. Then, I would organise real dates
between people who like each other’s in a specific atmosphere. They would pay
money for the app services and they will be really satisficed of its work.