Revised IERS Procedural Manual

Procedural Manual for DAO 20AA-ZZ
Industrial EcoWatch Rating System
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Environmental Management Bureau
Draft – Not for quotation or distribution

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE IERS ..................................................... 1
3.0 RATING AND COLOR CODING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ....... 2
3.1 Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet ............................................... 2
3.1.1 Environmental Performance Criteria ........................................................ 4
3.1.2 Weights of Environmental Performance Criterion ..................................... 4
3.1.3 Applicability Screening (Y or N) ................................................................ 4
3.1.4 Applicable Weights................................................................................... 4
3.1.5 Total Number of Conditions and Number of Complied Conditions ............ 4
3.1.6 Records Presented / Remarks .................................................................. 5
3.1.7 Environmental Performance Score ........................................................... 5
3.1.8 Environmental Performance Rating .......................................................... 5
3.2 Scoring per Environmental Performance Criterion .......................................... 5
3.2.1 PD 1586 and its IRR ................................................................................ 5
3.2.2 RA 6969 (Title II – Chemical Management) ............................................... 8
3.2.3 RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management) ................................ 19
3.2.4 RA 8749 and its IRR .............................................................................. 23
3.2.5 RA 9275 and its IRR .............................................................................. 26
3.2.6 RA 9003 and its IRR .............................................................................. 29
3.3 Rating Protocol ............................................................................................. 32
3.3.1 Identification of Priority Sector ............................................................... 34
3.3.2 Assessment of Applicable Criteria for Establishments to be Rated .......... 34
3.3.3 Assessment of Environmental Performance ............................................ 34
3.3.4 Review and Validation of Environmental Performance Rating ................. 35
3.3.5 Notification of Establishment Regarding Their Environmental Performance
Rating ................................................................................................... 35
4.0 EVALUATION OF THE IERS ...................................................................... 35
5.0 REVIEW AND REVISION ........................................................................... 36
REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 37
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET .................................. 39
NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT .......................................... 47
Draft – Not for quotation or distribution i

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
List of Tables
TABLE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING AND COLOR CODES .................................. 2
TABLE 2. STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET ............... 3
TABLE 3. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR PD 1586 AND ITS IRR...... 6
TABLE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 6969 (TITLE II – TOXIC
CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES) .......................................................................................... 9
TABLE 5. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 6969 (TITLE III –
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT).......................................................................... 20
TABLE 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 8749 AND ITS IRR .... 24
List of Annexes
ANNEX 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET
ANNEX 2. NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT
Draft – Not for quotation or distribution ii

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The commissioning of the Industrial EcoWatch Rating System (IERS) stems from
the basic policy of the Philippine Government to uphold the right of the Filipino to a
balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature.
Towards this end, the IERS shall be adopted by the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR) as part of its compliance monitoring system.
Pursuant to the following laws and their respective implementing rules and
regulations (IRR); DENR, through the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB),
shall obtain any record, report, or information pertaining to the establishments’
environmental performance:
Presidential Decree (PD) 1586 Philippine Environmental Impact Statement

(EIS) System
Republic Act (RA) 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear
Wastes Control Act of 1990
RA 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999
RA 9003 Ecological Solid Wastes Management Act of 2000
RA 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
Correspondingly, such information shall be made available to the public with due
consideration to any intellectual property rights, through the DENR’s IERS.
2.0 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE IERS
The IERS is intended to promote self-regulation among establishments for

improved environmental compliance and performance through a rating system. It
is designed to encourage pollution reduction beyond compliance and ensure
effective enforcement of the requirements on compliance inspection of PD 1586, RA
6969, RA 8749, RA 9003, RA 9275, and their respective IRR.
The IERS shall be applicable to all establishments as indicated in Section 3.0 of

DAO 20AA-ZZ Revised Guidelines for Industrial EcoWatch Rating System.
For planning and budgetary purposes, a list of priority establishments

shall be issued by the Office of the EMB Director based on the
following criteria:
Multi-media concerns
Priority sector for economic development either in the national or
regional level
Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 1

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
3.0 RATING AND COLOR CODING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
Environmental performance is the implementation and practice of responsible

environmental management that ensures, at the very minimum, compliance with
environmental laws and regulations and other related policies. Under the IERS,
environmental performance of establishments is rated based on compliance to the
following key environmental modules:
PD 1586 Philippine EIS System

RA 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act
of 1990
 Title II – Chemical Management
 Title III – Hazardous Waste Management
RA 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999
RA 9003 Ecological Solid Wastes Management Act of 2000
RA 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
Each environmental module has equal weight. To attain the minimum level of
performance (GOOD), an establishment must meet the performance rating shown
in Table 1. However, should an establishment get a failing rate (< 91%) in any
environmental module; it shall warrant a failed grade and a RED or BLACK
Environmental Performance Color Code, depending on the overall rating. Table 1
summarizes the performance rating and the equivalent color codes. The
succeeding subsections describe in detail the criteria and the rating process.
Table 1. Environmental Performance Rating and Color Codes

Performance Rating Level of Performance Color Code
Rated as Silver for Two Consecutive Years Excellent Gold
Rated as Green for Two Consecutive Years Outstanding Silver
At least 91% PLUS the emission and/ or
effluent concentrations are lower than the Very Good Green
applicable standards by at least 20%
91% rating and above Good Blue
71 to 90% rating Needs Improvement Red
70% rating and below Bad Black
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET
Each environmental module has its own separate worksheet and shall be assessed
and rated independently from one another. In addition, each module has an equal
contribution to the overall rating of an establishment. The structure of the
worksheet is presented in Table 2, while details are discussed hereafter.
Annex 1 presents the complete environmental performance rating worksheet to be

used for the IERS.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Table 2. Structure of the Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet
Environmental Applicability No. of Records Environmental Environmental
Applicable Total No. of
Module Performance Weights Screening Complied Presented/ Performance Performance
Weights Conditions
Criteria (Y or N) Conditions Remarks Score Rating

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
3.1.1 Environmental Performance Criteria
For each environmental module, specific criteria have been identified to be used in
assessing the environmental performance of establishments. These include, but
are not limited to, the following:
Securing of permits and/or clearances

Meeting performance standards
Training
Reporting
3.1.2 Weights of Environmental Performance Criterion
A specific weight is assigned per environmental performance criterion. Each

environmental module has a distinct total weight for all of its criteria.
The assigned weights are fixed and should not be changed from one establishment
to another. Should a change be deemed necessary, this shall only be conducted
after the review of the EMB Technical Committee and approval of the EMB Director.
3.1.3 Applicability Screening (Y or N)
Considering that not all requirements may be applicable to an establishment, an

applicability assessment shall be performed prior to evaluation. Each
environmental performance criterion shall be reviewed and assessed whether it can
be applied as criterion for a given establishment. If the criterion is determined to
be applicable, write “Y” in the applicability screening column; otherwise, write “N”.
3.1.4 Applicable Weights
An applicable criterion or a “Y” in the applicability screening column denotes that

the weight of the criterion shall be used in the evaluation. On the other hand, an
“N” denotes that no weight shall be used since the criterion is not applicable.
The total applicable weight can be obtained by adding all applicable weights and
noting the sum at the bottom cell under this column per module. Should there be
any inapplicable criterion/criteria, the corresponding weight shall be deducted from
the total weight of the module. For instance, if the total weight is 100 and one
criterion with a weight of 25 is not applicable to an establishment, the resulting
total applicable weight shall be 75.
3.1.5 Total Number of Conditions and Number of Complied Conditions
These fields are applicable only for environmental performance criterion pertaining
to Legal/Regulatory Instrument (permit, license, certificate, clearance) conditions,
analysis method recognitions, or Self-Monitoring Report (SMR) module
submissions.
List the conditions in the worksheet and evaluate each condition. Count the
number of complied conditions and the total number of conditions. Indicate both
counts in the worksheet.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
3.1.6 Records Presented / Remarks
This part of the environmental performance rating worksheet is very important as

this will justify the score of the establishment on the environmental performance
criterion. Specific records shall be listed corresponding to the environmental
performance criteria requirements.
Should the required records to meet environmental performance criteria be

unavailable, or if there are insufficiencies in the records; these should be indicated
in this part of the rating worksheet. Leaving blanks or stating “Not Applicable” is
not allowed.
3.1.7 Environmental Performance Score
Details on how each criterion is scored are presented in Section 3.2 of this
Procedural Manual. After scoring each criterion, the scores are then summed and
noted at the bottom cell under this column per module.
3.1.8 Environmental Performance Rating
The environmental performance rating in percentage (%) per module is obtained by

dividing the total score for the module with the total applicable weight, then
multiplying the quotient by 100. For cases where the resulting rating has decimal
places, the score shall be rounded off to the nearest whole number.
The overall environmental performance rating of the establishment is obtained by

averaging the rating of the six modules. However, should an establishment get a
failing rate (RED or BLACK) in any module; it shall warrant a failed grade and a
RED or BLACK Color Code, depending on the overall rating.
3.2 SCORING PER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE CRITERION
This section discusses the process on how each environmental performance

criterion shall be scored. Details per environmental module are presented in the
succeeding subsections.
3.2.1 PD 1586 and its IRR
This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for PD

1586 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines
presented in Table 3.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Table 3. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for PD 1586 and its IRR
Weights Conditions
PD 1586 With Valid ECC 5 N/A
Met ECC
25
Conditions
Met EMP
25
Commitments
Met EMoP
25
Commitments
Submitted CMR or
Module 5 of the
20
SMR Semi-
annually
Total 100

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid ECC
This criterion is applicable only to establishments covered by the EIS System. Give
a score of five provided that all of the following requirements were met:
Establishment has an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)

All facilities and infrastructure indicated in the Project Description are
covered by the Scope of the ECC
Expansion in terms of daily production capacity or area and/or process
modifications are covered by an ECC amendment or another ECC
Give a score of zero if it fails in any of the aforementioned requirements.
In listing the record(s) presented, the ECC number should be indicated as well as
its corresponding scope and coverage.
For establishments that have more than one ECC, all ECCs and their
corresponding number, and scope and coverage should be indicated.
Met ECC Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an ECC. List
and evaluate all environmentally-related ECC conditions during the establishment's
operational phase. Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all conditions.
If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10
environmentally-related ECC conditions during the establishment's operational
phase, and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the
applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20. However, if the establishment
failed any of the requirements for a valid ECC, a score of zero shall be given.
Met EMP Commitments

This criterion refers to the commitments specified in the Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) submitted as part of the EIS. List and evaluate the EMP
commitments related to the establishment's operational phase only. Give a score of
25 if the establishment satisfied all of the commitments specified in the EMP. If
not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 EMP
commitments and only eight commitments were satisfied; this means that 80
percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20.
Met EMoP Commitments

This criterion refers to the commitments specified in the Environmental Monitoring
Plan (EMoP) submitted as part of the EIS. List and evaluate the EMoP
commitments related to the establishment's operational phase only. Give a score of
25 if the establishment satisfied all of the commitments specified in the EMoP. If
not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 EMoP
commitments and only eight commitments were satisfied; this means that 80
percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Submitted CMR or Module 5 of the SMR Semi-annually

This criterion refers to the semi-annual submission of the Compliance Monitoring
Report (CMR) or Module 5 of the SMR. Give a score of 20 if the establishment
submitted the two CMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If only one
CMR was submitted completely and on time, a score of 10 shall be given. If none,
give a score of zero.
In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 5 of the
SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted
Module 5.
3.2.2 RA 6969 (Title II – Chemical Management)
This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA

6969, specifically Title II of DAO 1992-29: Toxic Chemical Substances. Scoring per
criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown in Table 4.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Table 4. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 6969 (Title II – Toxic Chemical Substances)
Applicability No. of Records Environmental Environmental
Environmental Applicable Total No. of
Module Weights Screening Complied Presented/ Performance Performance
Performance Criteria Weights Conditions
(Y or N) Conditions Remarks Score Rating
RA 6969 With Valid SQI
5 N/A
Title II – Clearance
Chemical Met SQI Clearance
10
Management Conditions
With Valid PMPIN
5 N/A
Compliance Certificate
Met PMPIN Compliance
10
Certificate Conditions
With Valid PCL
5 N/A
Met PCL Compliance
10
With Valid CCO
Registration Certificate
5 N/A
for Mercury and
Mercury Compounds
Met CCO Registration
10
for Mercury and
Mercury Compounds
With Valid Mercury and
Mercury Compounds 5 N/A
Importation Clearance
Met Mercury and
Mercury Compounds
10
Conditions
With Valid CCO
5 N/A
for Cyanide and Cyanide
Compounds
10
for Cyanide and Cyanide
Compounds
With Valid Cyanide and
Cyanide Compounds 5 N/A
Met Cyanide and
Cyanide Compounds
10
Conditions

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
RA 6969 With Valid CCO
Title II – Registration Certificate
Chemical for Asbestos and 5 N/A
Management Asbestos-containing
Products
for Asbestos and 10
Asbestos-containing
Products
With Valid Asbestos
5 N/A
Met Asbestos
Importation Clearance 10
Conditions
With Valid CCO
Registration Certificate 5 N/A
for PCBs
Certificate Conditions 10
for PCBs
Submitted Complete
15 N/A
PCB Inventory to EMB
With PCB Management
5 N/A
Plan Approval Certificate
Met PCB Management
Plan Approval Certificate 10
Conditions
With Valid CCO
5 N/A
for Lead and Lead
Compounds
10
for Lead and Lead
Compounds
With Valid Lead and
Lead Compounds 5 N/A
Met Lead and Lead
Compounds Importation 10
Clearance Conditions

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
RA 6969 With Valid CCO
Title II – Registration Certificate 5 N/A
Chemical for ODS
Management Met CCO Registration
Certificate Conditions 10
for ODS
With Valid Registration
Certificate as Dealers,
5 N/A
Retailers, and Resellers
of ODS
With Valid ODS Pre-
shipment Importation 5 N/A
Clearance
Met ODS PSIC
10
Conditions
With Valid ODS Pre-
shipment Export 5 N/A
Clearance
Met ODS PSEC
10
Conditions
Certificate as Service 5 N/A
Provider of ODS
With Chemical
10 N/A
Management Plan
With Contingency and
10 N/A
Emergency Plan
With Complete SDS 5
Observed Proper Storage
and Labeling of 5
Chemicals
Submitted Module 2A of
10
the SMR Quarterly
Total 225

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid SQI Clearance
This criterion refers to the Small Quantity Importation (SQI) Clearance
requirements for importing, manufacturing, and distributing chemicals not listed in
the Philippine Inventory of Chemicals and Chemical Substances (PICCS). It is
applicable only to establishments importing chemicals not listed in the PICCS, not
exceeding 1,000 kilograms (kg) per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) as
chemical component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture.
Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment and determine if each
chemical is listed in the PICCS. Each chemical not listed in the PICCS, not
exceeding 1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical
component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture, should have an SQI
Clearance. If all chemicals have corresponding SQI Clearance, give a score of five.
Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met SQI Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an SQI
Clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each SQI Clearance. Give
a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in all SQI
Clearances. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there
are a total of 10 conditions for all SQI Clearances and only eight conditions were
satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a
score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure SQI Clearance for all
applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid PMPIN Compliance Certificate

This criterion refers to the Pre-Manufacture and Pre-Importation Notification
(PMPIN) Compliance Certificate requirements for chemicals not listed in the PICCS.
It is applicable only to establishments importing chemicals not listed in the PICCS,
exceeding 1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical
component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture.
Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment and determine if each
chemical is listed in the PICCS. Each chemical not listed in the PICCS, exceeding
1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical component, in
percentage of weight of a product and mixture, should have a PMPIN Compliance
Certificate. If all chemicals have corresponding PMPIN Compliance Certificate, give
a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met PMPIN Compliance Certificate Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PMPIN
Compliance Certificate. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each PMPIN
Compliance Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in all PMPIN Compliance Certificates. If not, calculate the
percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are a total of 10 conditions for all
PMPIN Compliance Certificates and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means
that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight.
However, if the establishment failed to secure PMPIN Compliance Certificate for all

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid PCL Compliance Certificate
This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, distributing,
manufacturing, processing, and using chemicals under the Priority Chemical List
(PCL). Check the inventory of chemicals imported, manufactured, and used in the
establishment; and determine if the chemical is listed under the PCL. Each PCL
chemical should have a PCL Compliance Certificate. If all PCL chemicals have
corresponding PCL Compliance Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score
of zero shall be given.
Met PCL Compliance Certificate Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PCL
Compliance Certificate. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each PCL
Compliance Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in all PCL Compliance Certificates. If not, calculate the
percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are a total of 10 conditions for all
PCL Compliance Certificates and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means
that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight.
However, if the establishment failed to secure PCL Compliance Certificate for all
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Mercury and Mercury Compounds
manufacturing, processing, and using mercury and mercury compounds. Check
the inventory of mercury and mercury compounds in the establishment. If each
chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five.
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Mercury and Mercury

Compounds
This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO
Registration Certificate for Mercury and Mercury Compounds. List and evaluate
the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if
the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration
Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there
are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions
were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved,
giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO
Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance

This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing mercury and mercury
compounds. Check the inventory of mercury and mercury compounds in the
establishment. If each imported chemical has a corresponding importation
clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a mercury and
mercury compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions
specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment
satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the
importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80
percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable
chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds
manufacturing, processing, and using cyanide and cyanide compounds. Check the
inventory of cyanide and cyanide compounds in the establishment. If each
chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five.
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Cyanide and Cyanide

Compounds
Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds. List and evaluate the
conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate.
If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10
conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were
score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration
Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance

This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing cyanide and cyanide
compounds. Check the inventory of cyanide and cyanide compounds in the
Met Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a cyanide and
cyanide compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions
specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment
satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the
importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80
the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing

Products
manufacturing, and using asbestos and asbestos-containing products. Check the
inventory of asbestos and asbestos-containing products in the establishment. If
each chemical or product has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a
score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Asbestos and Asbestos-

containing Products
Registration Certificate for Asbestos. List and evaluate the conditions specified in
the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied
all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80
the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable
chemicals or products, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid Asbestos Importation Clearance

This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing asbestos and
asbestos-containing products. Check the inventory of asbestos and asbestos-
containing products in the establishment. If each imported chemical or product
has a corresponding importation clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score
Met Asbestos Importation Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an asbestos
importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the
importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage
of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation
clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of
the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. If the establishment
failed to secure importation clearance for all chemicals, a score of zero shall be
given. However, if the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that use, operate, recycle,
reprocess, store, treat, or dispose any equipment, materials, or wastes that are
contaminated with, in direct contact with, or containing Polychlorinated Biphenyl
(PCB) oil, PCB-contaminated oil, PCB equipment, PCB-contaminated equipment,
Non-PCB equipment, PCB-contaminated porous materials, PCB-contaminated non-
porous materials, and PCB wastes. Check if the establishment uses, operates,
recycles, reprocesses, stores, treats, or disposes any PCB-contaminated or PCB-
containing equipment, materials, or wastes. If the establishment has secured a
CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of
zero shall be given.
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for PCBs

Registration Certificate for PCBs. Evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO
Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO
the establishment failed to secure a CCO, a score of zero shall be given.
Submitted Complete PCB Inventory to EMB

Registration Certificate for PCBs. Give a score of 15 if the inventory is complete
and the establishment submitted the complete inventory within the prescribed
deadline. However, if the inventory is incomplete and/or the establishment failed
to secure a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate
Registration Certificate for PCBs. Give a score of five if the establishment has
secured PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate from the concerned EMB
Regional Office (RO). Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate Conditions

Registration Certificate for PCBs. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the
PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment
satisfied all conditions. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For
instance, if there are 10 conditions and only eight conditions were satisfied; this
means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of
eight. However, if the establishment has not yet submitted its PCB Management
Plan for approval of the concerned EMB RO, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Lead and Lead Compounds
This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, manufacturing,
distributing, and using lead and lead compounds. Check the inventory of lead and
lead compounds in the establishment. If each chemical has a corresponding CCO
Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be
given.
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Lead and Lead Compounds
Registration Certificate for Lead and Lead Compounds. List and evaluate the
conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate.
If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10
conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were
score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration
Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance

This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing lead and lead
compounds. Check the inventory of lead and lead compounds in the
Met Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a lead and lead
compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the
importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage
of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation
clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of
the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the
establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable chemicals, a
score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for ODS
This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, manufacturing,
processing, exporting, distributing, and using ozone-depleting substances (ODS).
Check the inventory of ODS in the establishment. If each chemical has a
corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score
Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for ODS

Registration Certificate for ODS. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the
CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all
conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the
percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO
the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable
With Valid Registration Certificate as Dealers, Retailers, and Resellers of ODS

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that serve as dealers, retailers,
and resellers of ODS. Give a score of five if the establishment has a valid
registration certificate as dealer, retailer, and reseller of ODS. Otherwise, a score of
With Valid ODS Pre-Shipment Importation Clearance (PSIC)

This criterion is applicable only to EMB-registered importers of ODS listed in
Section 3 and Appendix I (Annex C) of DAO 2013-25: Revised Regulations on the
Chemical Control Order for Ozone Depleting Substances. Check the inventory of
ODS in the establishment. If all shipments for each chemical have a corresponding
PSIC, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met ODS PSIC Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PSIC for ODS.
List and evaluate the conditions specified in the PSIC. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PSIC. If not, calculate the
percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the PSIC and
only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable
weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to
secure PSIC for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.
With Valid ODS Pre-Shipment Export Clearance (PSEC)

This criterion is applicable only to EMB-registered exporters of ODS listed in
Section 3 of DAO 2013-25. Check the records of ODS exported by the
establishment. If all shipments for each chemical have a corresponding PSEC, give
a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met ODS Pre-Shipment Export Clearance Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PSEC for
ODS. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the PSEC. Give a score of 10 if
the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PSEC. If not, calculate
the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the PSEC
and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the
applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
establishment failed to secure PSEC for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero
shall be given.
With Valid Registration Certificate as Service Provider for ODS

This criterion is applicable only to establishments performing the installation,
maintenance, service, repair, and/or operation of ODS-using equipment. Give a
score of five if the establishment has a valid registration certificate. Otherwise, a
With Chemical Management Plan

This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29
and refers to the availability of chemical management plan of the establishment to
implement precautionary health, safety, and environmental mitigation measures.
Check if the establishment has a Chemical Management Plan. If the establishment
has a Plan and satisfied the guidelines of DENR, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a
With Contingency and Emergency Plan

and refers to the availability of contingency and emergency plans of the
establishment to mitigate chemicals spills and accidents. Check if the
establishment has a Contingency and Emergency Plan. If the establishment has a
Plan and satisfied the guidelines of DENR, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of
With Complete SDS

and refers to the availability of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for each chemical used by
the establishment. Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment
and determine if each chemical has a corresponding and complete SDS.
Completeness of the SDS shall be based on the requirements of Joint DTI-DENR-
DA-DOF-DOH-DILG-DOLE-DOTC Administrative Order (JAO) 2009-01 or The
Adoption and Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification
and Labeling of Chemicals. If all chemicals have corresponding and complete SDS,
give a score of five. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if
there are 20 chemicals and only 12 chemicals had corresponding and complete
SDS; this means that 60 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a
score of three.
Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Chemicals

and refers to an establishment’s adherence with chemical storage and labeling
requirements. Using the Chemical Management Plan and/or SDS of each
chemical, check if the storage requirements are observed by the establishment. In
addition, check if the chemicals are labeled as prescribed by JAO 2009-001. If all
chemicals are stored and labeled appropriately, give a score of five. If not, calculate
the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 20 chemicals and only 12
chemicals were stored and labeled appropriately; this means that 60 percent of the
applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of three.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Submitted Module 2A of the SMR Quarterly

and refers to the quarterly submission of Module 2A of the SMR. Give a score of 10
if the establishment submitted Module 2A of the four SMRs of the previous year
completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For
instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 2A and on time;
this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of
five.
In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 2A of the
Module 2A.
3.2.3 RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management)

6969, specifically DAO 2013-22: Revised Procedures and Standards for the
Management of Hazardous Wastes (Revising DAO 2004-36) and JAO 2013-09-001.
Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines presented in Table 5.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Table 5. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management)
RA 6969 Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Title III – Waste Generator
Hazardous Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Waste Waste Transporter
Management Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Waste TSD Facility
Maintained an Inventory
of Hazardous/Special 10 N/A
Wastes
and Labeling of
10 N/A
Hazardous/Special
Wastes
Contracted DENR-
10 N/A
registered Transporters
Contracted DENR-
10 N/A
Registered Treaters
Complied with
Hazardous Waste
10 N/A
Transport Manifest
System
Contracted Transporters
have Valid Permit to 10 N/A
Transport
Treated
Hazardous/Special
10 N/A
Wastes have
Corresponding COT
Has Established an
Emergency Contingency 5 N/A
Plan
With Trained Staff and
Personnel on Hazardous
Waste Management,
10 N/A
Contingency Plan, and
Compliance Monitoring
Procedures
Submitted Module 2B of
10
the SMR
Total 110

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Registered Hazardous Waste Generator
This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22. Check if
the establishment is registered as a hazardous waste generator. In addition, check
if all hazardous wastes generated were listed in the submitted hazardous waste
generator form. Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both
requirements. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter

This criterion is applicable only to establishments transporting hazardous wastes
per DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment is registered as a hazardous waste
transporter. In addition, check if all transport vehicles used in transporting
hazardous wastes were listed in the submitted hazardous waste transporter form.
Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both requirements. Otherwise, a
Registered Hazardous Waste TSD Facility

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that are treating, storing, and/or
disposing hazardous wastes per DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment is
registered as a hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facility. In
addition, check if all TSD process/areas were included in the submitted hazardous
waste TSD form. Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both
requirements. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
A hazardous waste TSD Facility is also a hazardous waste generator. Hence,

such establishment should have Registration Certificates as generator and as TSD
Facility. Similarly, a hazardous waste generator treating its own generated
hazardous wastes must also register as a TSD Facility (Category A).
In addition, a hazardous waste TSD Facility can be a hazardous waste

Transporter. In this case, such establishment should have Registration Certificates
as generator, as Transporter, and as TSD Facility.
Maintained an Inventory of Hazardous/Special Wastes

the establishment has an inventory of hazardous/special waste generated. The
inventory should include the amount of waste generated and stored by the
establishment as well as the amount of waste treated/disposed offsite. If the
inventory is balanced and complete, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero
shall be given.
Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Hazardous/Special Wastes

the storage and labeling requirements prescribed by DAO 2013-22 were observed
by the establishment. If all hazardous/special wastes were stored and labeled
appropriately, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Contracted DENR-Registered Transporters

This criterion refers to the contracted hazardous waste transporters of the
establishment. Check if the contracted hazardous waste transporters are
registered with DENR to transport the hazardous wastes hauled from the
establishment. If all contracted hazardous waste transporters are registered, give a
score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Contracted DENR-Registered Treaters
This criterion refers to the contracted hazardous waste treaters of the
establishment. Check if the contracted hazardous waste treaters are registered
with DENR to treat the hazardous wastes of the establishment. If all contracted
hazardous waste treaters are registered, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of
Complied with Hazardous Waste Transport Manifest System

This criterion refers to the establishment’s compliance with the Hazardous Waste
Transport Manifest System. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were
covered by corresponding manifest forms. Specifically, check each manifest if it
satisfied the following requirements:
Completely filled up Section A: Generator

Completely filled up Section B: Transporters
Completely filled up Section C: Treater
Proof of receipt of EMB
If all of the above requirements were met for all manifests, give a score of 10.
Contracted Transporters have Valid Permit to Transport

This criterion refers to the availability of Valid Permit to Transport for hazardous
waste transported off the establishment by contracted hazardous waste
transporters. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were covered by
corresponding permit to transport and the type of hazardous wastes written in the
permit were the same as the type of hazardous wastes transported. In addition,
check if the amount of hazardous wastes written in the permit was greater than or
equal to the amount of hazardous wastes transported. If all of the aforementioned
requirements were met, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be
given.
Treated Hazardous/Special Wastes have Corresponding COT

This criterion refers to the availability of Certificate of Treatment (COT) for
hazardous/special wastes treated from the establishment by contracted hazardous
waste treaters. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were covered by
corresponding COTs and if the type and amount of hazardous wastes written in the
COT were the same as the type and amount of hazardous wastes written in the
manifest. If all of the aforementioned requirements were met, give a score of 10.
Has Established an Emergency Contingency Plan

This criterion refers to the availability of emergency contingency plans of the
establishment to mitigate and combat hazardous waste spills and accidents. If the
establishment's Emergency Contingency Plan satisfied the requirements prescribed
by DAO 2013-22, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Trained Staff and Personnel on Hazardous Waste Management,
Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures
This criterion refers to the availability of trained personnel on Hazardous Waste
Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures, as
required by DAO 2013-22. Check how many personnel are in charge of handling
hazardous wastes. From these, check if the designated personnel have relevant
trainings on Hazardous Waste Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance
Monitoring Procedures. If all designated personnel have the relevant trainings
(minimum of 8 hours of training), give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero
shall be given.
Submitted Module 2B of the SMR

This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22 and
refers to the submission of Module 2B of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment submitted Module 2B of the SMR of the previous year completely
and on time in accordance to Section 3.2 (Table 3.2) of DAO 2013-22. If not,
calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if an establishment is
required to submit the SMR quarterly, and only two SMRs were submitted with
complete Module 2B and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable
weight was achieved, giving a score of five.
In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 2B of the
Module 2B.
3.2.4 RA 8749 and its IRR

8749 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown
in Table 6.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Table 6. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 8749 and its IRR
RA 8749 With Valid PTO for All
Air Pollution Source and 5 N/A
Control Installation
Met PTO Conditions 10
Conducted Testing and
Analysis for Emission
Source using EMB-
Registered Third Party
15 N/A
Source Emission Testing
Firm and EMB-
Recognized Laboratory
Respectively
Compliant CEMS
and/or COMS 10 N/A
Installations
Conducted
CEMS/COMS Audit
10 N/A
Annually with
Compliant Results
Complied with NESSAP 40 N/A
Conducted Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring with 40 N/A
Compliant Results
Submitted Module 4 of
10
the SMR Quarterly
Total 140

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid PTO for All Air Pollution Source and Control Installation
This criterion refers to the availability of Permit to Operate (PTO) for all air pollution
sources and air pollution control installation of an establishment. Give a score of
five if all sources and installations of the establishment are in the PTO or have
corresponding PTO. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met PTO Conditions

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PTO for air
pollution sources and/or air pollution control installation. List and evaluate
conditions related to the establishment's PTO. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PTO. If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions and only eight
conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was
achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure PTO
for all sources and installations, a score of zero shall be given.
Conducted Testing and Analysis for Emission Source using EMB-Registered

Third Party Source Emission Testing Firm and EMB-Recognized Laboratory
Respectively
This criterion refers to the utilization of EMB-registered third party source emission
testing firm and EMB-recognized laboratory for source emission testing and
analysis, respectively. Check if emission testing was conducted for all required
parameters by an EMB-registered third party source emission testing firm. In
addition, check if the analysis was conducted by an EMB-recognized laboratory. If
all the above requirements were met, give a score of 15. If not, calculate the
percentage of compliance.
For instance, if there are five parameters to be tested and the third party source
emission testing firm is only registered to conduct testing for four parameters; this
means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12.
Similarly, if there are five parameters to be analyzed and the laboratory is only
recognized to conduct analysis for four parameters; this means that 80 percent of
the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. On the other hand, if
there are five parameters to be tested and analyzed, and the third party source
emission testing firm is only registered to conduct testing of four parameters, while
the laboratory is only recognized to conduct testing of three parameters, this means
that 60 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of nine.
Compliant CEMS and/or COMS Installations

This criterion is applicable only to establishments utilizing Continuous Emission
Monitoring System (CEMS) and/or Continuous Opacity Monitoring System (COMS).
It refers to the adherence of an establishment’s CEMS and/or COMS with the
requirements stipulated in the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 60 Appendix B. Give a score of
10 if the CEMS and/or COMS installed are compliant with the requirements of
USEPA 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix B. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Conducted CEMS/COMS Audit Annually with Compliant Results

This criterion refers to the conduct of audit annually for the establishment’s CEMS
and/or COMS. Check if the audit was conducted in the presence of authorized
EMB personnel. In addition, check if the results of the audit were compliant with
the National Emission Standards for Source Specific Air Pollutants (NESSAP). If all
the aforementioned requirements were met, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Complied with NESSAP
This criterion refers to the establishment’s compliance with the NESSAP. Give a
score of 40 if all emission sources met the NESSAP for all appropriate parameters.
A score of zero shall then be given if any of the following was observed:
Emission results were not compliant with the NESSAP

Testing was not conducted by an EMB-registered third party source
emission testing firm
Analysis was not conducted by an EMB-recognized laboratory
Audit was not conducted in the presence of authorized EMB personnel and
results were not compliant
For emission results that were all compliant, calculate how much lower the results
were compared to the NESSAP. An establishment with emission results lower than
the NESSAP by at least 20 percent may be a candidate for a GREEN color code.
Conducted Ambient Air Quality Monitoring with Compliant Results

This criterion is applicable only to establishments where source emission testing is
not possible. Give a score of 40 if the results of ambient air quality monitoring met
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Source Specific Air
Pollutants from Industrial Sources/Operations for all appropriate parameters.
Submitted Module 4 of the SMR Quarterly

This criterion refers to the quarterly submission of Module 4 of the SMR. Give a
score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 4 of the four SMRs of the
previous year completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of
satisfaction. For instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module
4 and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved,
giving a score of five.
Module 4.

9275 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines
presented in Table 7.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Module Weights Screening Complied Presented Performance Performance
(Y or N) Conditions / Remarks Score Rating
RA 9275 With Valid DP for All
10 N/A
Discharge Points
Met DP Conditions 25
Conducted Analysis for
Effluent Source using
EMB-Approved Method 15
or EMB-Recognized
Laboratory
Complied with Effluent
40 N/A
Standards
Observed Proper Onsite
Treatment and Disposal 40 N/A
of Effluent
Observed Proper Offsite
Transport, Storage,
40 N/A
Treatment, and Disposal
of ESS
10
the SMR Quarterly
Total 180

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Valid DP for All Discharge Points
This criterion refers to the availability of Discharge Permit (DP) for all discharge
points. Give a score of 10 if all discharge points of the establishment are in the DP
or have corresponding DP. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Met DP Conditions
This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a DP for
discharge points. List and evaluate conditions related to the establishment's DP.
Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the DP.
If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10
conditions and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of
the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20. However, if the
establishment failed to secure DP for all discharge points, a score of zero shall be
given.
Conducted Analysis for Effluent Source using EMB-Approved Method or EMB-

Recognized Laboratory
This criterion refers to the utilization of EMB-approved method of analysis or EMB-
recognized laboratory for effluent source. Give a score of 15 if the effluent analysis
was conducted for all required parameters using EMB-approved methods or by an
EMB-recognized laboratory. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For
instance, if there are five parameters to be analyzed and the method of analysis for
one parameter is not EMB-approved; this means that 80 percent of the applicable
weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. Similarly, if there are five parameters to
be analyzed and the laboratory is only recognized to conduct analysis for four
parameters; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved,
giving a score of 12.
Observed Proper Onsite Treatment and Disposal of Effluent

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that treat and dispose effluent
onsite. Give a score of 40 if the establishment's effluent results were compliant
with the effluent standards. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
For effluent results that were all compliant, calculate how much lower the results
were compared to the effluent standards. An establishment with effluent results
lower than the effluent standards by at least 20 percent may be a candidate for a
GREEN color code.
Observed Proper Offsite Transport, Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of ESS

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that have their effluent, sewage,
and/or septage (ESS) transported, treated, stored, and/or disposed offsite. Check
if the establishment observed the following:
Contracted EMB-registered ESS Transporter

Contracted EMB-registered ESS TSD Facility
Complied with ESS Manifest System
Contracted ESS Transporters have Valid Permit to Transport
Secured COT for the ESS
If all the above requirements were met, give a score of 40. Otherwise a score of zero
shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of submitted Module
3.

9003 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown
in Table 8.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
RA 9003 With Documented Solid
Waste Management 10 N/A
Program
Has Provision for Solid
Waste Segregation at 20 N/A
Source
Practiced Solid Waste
10 N/A
Segregation at Source
Operated and
Maintained Appropriate
10 N/A
Storage Facility with
Proper Labeling
Used Appropriate
Disposal Method for 10 N/A
Biodegradable Wastes
Practiced Proper
Management of 10 N/A
Recyclable Wastes
Used Appropriate
Disposal Facility for 10 N/A
Residual Wastes
Operated and
Maintained Appropriate 10 N/A
Composting Facility
Maintained Records of
Weights or Volume and 10 N/A
Types of Solid Wastes
Personnel Handling 10
Solid Wastes
10
the SMR Quarterly
Total 120

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
With Documented Solid Waste Management Program
This criterion refers to an establishment’s documentation of their solid waste
management program. Give a score of 10 if the establishment properly
documented its solid waste management program. Otherwise, a score of zero shall
be given.
Has Provision for Solid Waste Segregation at Source

This criterion refers to an establishment’s provision for solid waste segregation at
source. Give a score of 20 if the establishment provided appropriate containers or
receptacles (i.e. bins) for the segregation of each type of solid waste at source (i.e.,
biodegradable, recyclable, residual, non-traditional). If not, calculate the
percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 types of solid wastes in the
establishment and appropriate containers for only eight types of solid wastes were
provided; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving
a score of 16.
Practiced Solid Waste Segregation at Source

This criterion refers to an establishment’s practice of waste segregation at source.
Give a score of 10 if the establishment’s employees practice solid waste segregation
for each type of solid waste at source. If not, calculate the percentage of
satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 types of solid wastes in the establishment
and only eight were properly segregated, this means that 80 percent of the
applicable was achieved, giving a score of eight.
Operated and Maintained Appropriate Solid Waste Storage Facility

This criterion is applicable to all establishments. Give a score of 10 if the
establishment has appropriately operated and maintained its solid waste storage
facility. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Used Appropriate Disposal Method for Biodegradable Wastes

This criterion refers to an establishment’s disposal of biodegradable wastes. Give a
score of 10 if the establishment used the appropriate disposal method for its
biodegradable wastes. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Practiced Proper Management of Recyclable Wastes

This criterion refers to an establishment’s management of recyclable wastes. Give a
score of 10 if the establishment properly managed its recyclable wastes. Otherwise,
a score of zero shall be given.
Used Appropriate Disposal Facility for Residual Wastes

This criterion refers to an establishment’s usage of appropriate disposal facility for
residual wastes. Give a score of 10 if the establishment used an appropriate
disposal facility of residual wastes. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.
Operated and Maintained Appropriate Composting Facility

This criterion is applicable only to establishments that operate and maintain a
composting facility inside their facility. Give a score of 10 if the establishment has
appropriately operated and maintained their composting facility. Otherwise, a

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Maintained Records of Weights or Volume and Types of Solid Wastes
This criterion refers to an establishment’s recording of solid wastes generated.
Check if the establishment has maintained records of weights or volume and types
of solid waste generated. The record should include the amount of waste generated
and stored by the establishment as well as treated/disposed offsite. If the
inventory is balanced and complete, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero
shall be given.
With Trained Staff and Personnel Handling Solid Wastes

This criterion refers to the availability of trained personnel on solid waste
management. Check how many personnel are in charge of handling solid waste.
From these, check if the designated personnel have appropriate trainings on solid
waste management. If all designated personnel have the appropriate trainings, give
a score of 10. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, there
are 20 designated personnel and only 18 have appropriate trainings on solid waste
management, this means that 90 percent of the applicable weight was achieved,
giving a score of nine.

Module 6.
3.3 RATING PROTOCOL
This section discusses the process flow during the implementation of the IERS. As
illustrated in Figure 1, EMB Central Office (CO) shall be responsible in planning
and overseeing the whole process. In addition, they will serve as the Quality
Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) of the IERS. On the other hand, EMB ROs
shall execute the actual fieldwork (i.e. rating the establishments) and compile the
necessary records.
Details of each process of the IERS are discussed in the succeeding subsections.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
Figure 1 IERS Rating Protocol

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
3.3.1 Identification of Priority Sector
EMB CO shall identify the priority sector(s) to be evaluated under the IERS for the
upcoming grading year through a consultative meeting. Pursuant to Section 2.0 of
this Procedural Manual, priority sector(s) shall be identified based on multi-media
concerns (water quality, air quality, chemical, and waste management concerns)
and significance with regards to economic development either in the national or
regional level.
Priority identification shall be done two months before the launch of the IERS, and
shall be carried out during the fourth quarter of the previous grading year.
3.3.2 Assessment of Applicable Criteria for Establishments to be Rated
Pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Procedural Manual, EMB ROs shall assess the
applicable criteria for each establishment to be rated. The assessment shall be
reflected on the Applicability Screening and Applicable Weight columns on the
worksheet (see Annex 1). Non-applicable criteria shall be ticked with an “N” mark
under the Applicability Screening column, while an “n/a” mark shall be placed
under the Applicable Weight column. The total applicable weight shall be obtained
by adding all applicable weights and noting the sum at the bottom cell under this
column per environmental module.
The assessment of applicable criteria is considered a part of the Environmental

Performance Rating exercise proper, and shall be done within the second quarter of
the current grading year.
3.3.3 Assessment of Environmental Performance
The assessment shall cover the environmental performance of the establishment

during the previous year.
The EMB RO representative shall gather all necessary data, including but not
limited to effluent/emission test data, permits/licenses/certificates, emergency
plans, corresponding SMR modules, and similar items (refer to Annex 1 for a
complete listing of the criteria per module). Based on the gathered data and using
the environmental performance rating worksheet, EMB RO shall perform the actual
rating exercise. Throughout the exercise, EMB RO shall conduct meeting/s with
the establishment being rated as necessary to clear up any confusion and/or
miscommunications immediately.
Grading shall follow the guidelines outlined in Sections 3.2 of this Procedural
Manual. Upon completion of the grading exercise, the color code corresponding to
the resultant grade shall be noted. EMB RO shall then forward to EMB CO the
completely filled-up Environmental Performance Worksheet noting the initial
eco-watch rating and color codes of the establishments as well as pertinent
documents used during the evaluation process. It should be emphasized that the
results from the rating exercise by EMB ROs are initial only, and are still subject
for review by EMB CO.
The Environmental Performance Assessment process shall be accomplished within

the second quarter of the current grading year.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
3.3.4 Review and Validation of Environmental Performance Rating
EMB CO shall review and validate the Environmental Performance Rating to ensure
that the evaluation process has been conducted in accordance with the guidelines
and procedures set forth in this Procedural Manual.
In the case where EMB CO ascertains substantial errors in the rating process, EMB
CO shall notify the corresponding EMB RO and may conduct on-site validation.
This process shall be accomplished within the third quarter of the current grading
year.
EMB CO shall review and validate the ratings of EMB ROs only for the first three
years of implementing the revised guideline and procedural manual of the IERS.
After the said time period, EMB CO shall conduct review and validation after every
three years. This is to ensure adherence to the IERS protocol and to institute a
monitoring mechanism on the EMB ROs’ implementation of the IERS.
3.3.5 Notification of Establishment Regarding Their Environmental

Performance Rating
After review, EMB CO shall send a letter of notification (see Annex 2 for letter
template) to the establishment containing their Environmental Performance Rating.
The letters are to be distributed on or before January 31 of the following year.
Validated environmental performance ratings are considered final (for the current
grading year).
4.0 EVALUATION OF THE IERS
To evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of the IERS, the implementation shall
be subject to regular monitoring, evaluation, and/or formal review by EMB. The
following aspects shall be monitored and evaluated:
Institutionalization Aspect
The extent and stability of the institutionalization, in terms of

mainstreaming, of the IERS shall be evaluated every six months for the first
three years of evaluation. After which, the evaluation can be done every two
to three years.
Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:
 Staffing Level – Evaluation of the number of personnel assigned or

designated to implement the IERS at the EMB CO and RO. At the
minimum, one personnel in EMB CO and one in each EMB RO shall
be exclusively assigned (full-time) to manage and/or implement the
IERS.
 Capability and Training – Evaluation of the capability and capability

building activities for personnel assigned or designated to implement
the IERS. The attendance of staff directly involved in the IERS shall
be a minimum of one training per year. Such training shall be in the
subject area directly related to public disclosure and/or compliance
monitoring.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
 Program Funding – Evaluation of the adequacy of funding and other

resources allocation for the implementation of the IERS. The
minimum benchmark shall be the inclusion of a regular item in the
budget program at EMB CO and ROs exclusively for the IERS by the
second year of implementation.
Operationalization Aspect
The effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the IERS shall be

evaluated every year. Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:
 Overall Coverage – Evaluation of the expansion of the coverage of the

IERS. The evaluation shall be based on the schedule of
implementation phases as issued by EMB.
 Sector Coverage – Evaluation of the expansion of the sectoral coverage

of the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is the
addition of one sector every year in each region.
 Establishment Coverage – Evaluation of the number of establishments

covered by the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is an
increase of at least five percent every year in the number of
establishments covered by the IERS.
Social Acceptability Aspect
The extent of social acceptability of the IERS shall be evaluated every year.
Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:
 Timeliness – Evaluation of the timeliness of public disclosure under

the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is the release of
rating exercise as per prescribed schedules on a regular basis.
 Participation – Evaluation of the desirability of participation in the

IERS. One of the possible benchmarks for this element is the number
of establishments voluntarily desiring participation in the IERS.
These evaluation criteria are not exhaustive or definitive. Revisions and/or

additional criteria/benchmarks may be undertaken to fine tune the evaluation
process. At the minimum, these evaluation criteria shall be reviewed every three
years to assess their appropriateness and/or relevance.
5.0 REVIEW AND REVISION
Any amendments, revisions, or changes to DAO 20AA-ZZ shall trigger the review
and amendment or revision of this Procedural Manual. On the other hand,
amendment, revision, or change to this Procedural Manual may not require the
amendment or revision of DAO 20AA-ZZ, provided that the amendment or revision
of this Procedural Manual is still consistent with DAO 20AA-ZZ.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
REFERENCES
DENR Administrative Order No. 1990-34 Revised Water Usage and

Classification/Water Quality Criteria Amending Section Nos. 68 and 69,
Chapter III of the 1978 NPCC Rules and Regulations
DENR Administrative Order No. 1990-35 Revised Effluent Regulations of 1990,

Revising and Amending the Effluent Regulations of 1982
DENR Administrative Order No. 1992-29 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)
of RA 6969
DENR Administrative Order No. 1997-38 Chemical Control Order for Mercury and
Mercury Compounds
DENR Administrative Order No. 1997-39 Chemical Control Order for Cyanide and
Cyanide Compounds
DENR Administrative Order No. 2000-02 Chemical Control Order for Asbestos
DENR Administrative Order No. 2000-82 Integrated Air Quality Improvement

Framework-Air Quality Control Action Plan
of RA 9003
of RA 8749
DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-26 Revised Industrial EcoWatch System

Amending Implementing Guidelines of DAO 1998-51 Series of 1998
DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-27 Amending DAO 26, DAO 29, and DAO
2001-81 Among Others on the Preparation and Submission of Self-
Monitoring Reports (SMR)DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30
Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of PD 1586
DENR Administrative Order No. 2004-26 Amending Rule XIX of DAO 2000-81
of RA 9275
DENR Administrative Order No. 2005-27 Revised Priority Chemical List
DENR Administrative Order No. 2007-22 Guidelines on the Requirements for

Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) and Other Acceptable
Protocols, Thereby Modifying and Clarifying Certain Provisions of Section 5,
Rule X of DAO 2000-81 and Other Related Provisions
DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-22 Revised Procedures and Standards for the
Management of Hazardous Wastes (Revising DAO 2004-36).
DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-24 Chemical Control Order (CCO) for Lead
and Lead Compounds

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-25 Revised Regulations on the Chemical
Control Order for Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)
DENR Administrative Order No. 20XX-XX Revised Chemical Control Order (CCO)
for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Amending DAO 2004-01
DENR Administrative Order No. 20YY-YY Guidelines for the Transport, Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal of Effluent, Sewage, and/or Septage Offsite
EMB Memorandum Circular No. 2007-003 Policy on Compliance and Permitting for
Industrial Facilities Relating to Air Quality
Presidential Decree No. 1586 Establishing an Environmental Impact Statement

System including Other Environmental Management Related Measures and
for other Purposes
Republic Act No. 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes
Control Act of 1990
Republic Act No. 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999
Republic Act No. 9003 Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000
Republic Act No. 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET
Environmental Applicability Records Environmental

Total No. of No. of Complied Environmental
Module Performance Weights Screening Applicable Weights Presented/ Performance
Conditions Conditions Performance Score
Criteria (Y or N) Remarks Rating
PD 1586
With ECC 5 N/A
Met ECC
25
Conditions
Met EMP
25
Commitments
Met EMoP
25
Commitments
Submitted CMR
or Module 5 of
20
the SMR Semi-
annually
Total 100

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 6969 With Valid SQI Clearance 5 N/A
Title II –
Chemical Met SQI Clearance
10
Management Conditions
With Valid PMPIN
5 N/A
Met PMPIN Compliance
10
With Valid PCL Compliance
5 N/A
Certificate
Met PCL Compliance
10
With Valid CCO Registration
Certificate for Mercury and 5 N/A
Mercury Compounds
Certificate Conditions for
10
Mercury and Mercury
Compounds Conditions
With Valid Mercury and
Mercury Compounds 5 N/A
Met Mercury and Mercury
Certificate for Cyanide and 5 N/A
Cyanide Compounds
Certificate Conditions for
10
Cyanide and Cyanide
Compounds
With Valid Cyanide and
Cyanide Compounds 5 N/A
Met Cyanide and Cyanide
Certificate for Asbestos and
5 N/A
Asbestos-containing
Products

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 6969 Met CCO Registration
Title II – Certificate Conditions for
10
Chemical Asbestos and Asbestos-
Management containing Products
With Valid Asbestos
5 N/A
Met Asbestos Importation
10
5 N/A
Certificate for PCBs
Certificate Conditions for 10
PCBs
Submitted Complete PCB
15 N/A
Inventory to EMB
With PCB Management Plan
5 N/A
Approval Certificate
Met PCB Management Plan
Approval Certificate 10
Conditions
Certificate for Lead and Lead 5 N/A
Compounds
Lead and Lead Compounds
With Valid Lead and Lead
Compounds Importation 5 N/A
Clearance
Met Lead and Lead
5 N/A
Certificate for ODS
ODS
Certificate as Dealers,
5 N/A
Retailers, and Resellers of
ODS

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 6969 With Valid ODS Pre-
Title II – shipment Importation 5 N/A
Chemical Clearance
Management Met ODS PSIC Conditions 10
With Valid ODS Pre-
5 N/A
shipment Export Clearance
Met ODS PSEC Conditions 10
Certificate as Service 5 N/A
Provider of ODS
With Chemical Management
10 N/A
Plan
With Contingency and
10 N/A
Emergency Plan
With Complete SDS 5
Observed Proper Storage and
5
Labeling of Chemicals
Submitted Module 2A of the
10
SMR Quarterly
Total 225

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 6969 Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Title III – Waste Generator
Hazardous Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Waste Wastes Transporter
Management Registered Hazardous
5 N/A
Wastes TSD Facility
Maintained an Inventory
of Hazardous/Special 10 N/A
Wastes
and Labeling of
10 N/A
Hazardous/Special
Wastes
Contracted DENR-
10 N/A
registered Transporters
Contracted DENR-
10 N/A
registered Treaters
Complied with
Hazardous Waste
10 N/A
Transport Manifest
System
Contracted Transporters
have Valid Permit to 10 N/A
Transport
Treated
Hazardous/Special
10 N/A
Wastes have
Corresponding COT
Has Established an
Emergency Contingency 5 N/A
Plan
Personnel on Hazardous
Waste Management,
10 N/A
Contingency Plan, and
Compliance Monitoring
Procedures
Submitted Module 2B of
10
the SMR
Total 110

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 8749 With Valid PTO for All
Air Pollution Source and 5 N/A
Control Installation
Met PTO Conditions 10
Conducted Testing and
Analysis for Emission
Source using EMB-
Registered Third Party
15 N/A
Source Emission Testing
Firm and EMB-
recognized Laboratory
Respectively
Compliant CEMS
and/or COMS 10 N/A
Installations
Conducted
CEMS/COMS Audit
10 N/A
Annually with
Compliant Results
Complied with NESSAP 40 N/A
Conducted Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring and
40 N/A
Results with Compliant
Results
10
the SMR Quarterly
Total 140

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

Weights Conditions
RA 9275 With Valid DP for All
10 N/A
Discharge Points
Met DP Conditions 25
Conducted Analysis
for Effluent Source
using EMB-Approved
15
Method or EMB-
Recognized
Laboratory
Complied with
40 N/A
Effluent Standards
Observed Proper
Onsite Treatment
40 N/A
and Disposal of
Effluent
Observed Proper
Offsite Transport,
40 N/A
Storage, Treatment,
and Disposal of ESS
Submitted Module 3
10
of the SMR Quarterly
Total 180

PROCEDURAL MANUAL

RA 9003 With Documented Solid
Waste Management 10 N/A
Program
Has Provision for Solid
Waste Segregation at 20
Source
Practiced Solid Waste
10
Segregation at Source
Operated and Maintained
Appropriate Storage Facility 10 N/A
with Proper Labeling
Used Appropriate Disposal
Method for Biodegradable 10 N/A
Wastes
Practiced Proper
Management of Recyclable 10 N/A
Wastes
Used Appropriate Disposal
10 N/A
Facility for Residual Wastes
Operated and Maintained
Appropriate Composting 10 N/A
Facility
Maintained Records of
Weights or Volume and 10 N/A
Types of Solid Wastes
Personnel Handling Solid 10
Wastes
Submitted Module 6 of the
10
SMR Quarterly
Total 120
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
__________________ _________________ _________________

Name and Position PCD Chief Regional Director

PROCEDURAL MANUAL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT

(To be printed on DENR Letterhead)
Name/Title of Managing Head

Name of Establishment
Address
ATTENTION: Name/Title of Pollution Control Officer
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING

Name of Establishment
Address/Location of Establishment
Dear Sir/Madam:
Greetings. This is to officially inform you that your establishment located at

place/address of establishment has been pre-selected as part of our Industrial
EcoWatch Rating System (IERS). Based on our evaluation and findings, the said
establishment has been rated as:
Rating
For the Period
Month to Month, Year
Attached is the filled up Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for your

establishment. In case you need any clarification/s, you may visit our office or
contact name/title/unit of ECOWATCH focal person for more details. The rating
shall be considered as final if we do not receive any objection/s from you within the
next 30 days.
We look forward to your continued cooperation and compliance.
Yours truly,
Name of Regional Director

Regional Director

Revised IERS Procedural Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revised IERS Procedural Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Procedural Manual for DAO 20AA-ZZ

Industrial EcoWatch Rating System

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution i

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution ii

Presidential Decree (PD) 1586 Philippine Environmental Impact Statement

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE IERS

The IERS is intended to promote self-regulation among establishments for

The IERS shall be applicable to all establishments as indicated in Section 3.0 of

For planning and budgetary purposes, a list of priority establishments

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 1

3.0 RATING AND COLOR CODING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

Environmental performance is the implementation and practice of responsible

PD 1586 Philippine EIS System

Table 1. Environmental Performance Rating and Color Codes

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET

Annex 1 presents the complete environmental performance rating worksheet to be

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 2

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 3

Securing of permits and/or clearances

3.1.2 Weights of Environmental Performance Criterion

A specific weight is assigned per environmental performance criterion. Each

3.1.3 Applicability Screening (Y or N)

Considering that not all requirements may be applicable to an establishment, an

3.1.4 Applicable Weights

An applicable criterion or a “Y” in the applicability screening column denotes that

3.1.5 Total Number of Conditions and Number of Complied Conditions

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 4

This part of the environmental performance rating worksheet is very important as

Should the required records to meet environmental performance criteria be

3.1.7 Environmental Performance Score

3.1.8 Environmental Performance Rating

The environmental performance rating in percentage (%) per module is obtained by

The overall environmental performance rating of the establishment is obtained by

3.2 SCORING PER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE CRITERION

This section discusses the process on how each environmental performance

3.2.1 PD 1586 and its IRR

This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for PD

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 5

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 6

Establishment has an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)

Give a score of zero if it fails in any of the aforementioned requirements.

Met ECC Conditions

Met EMP Commitments

Met EMoP Commitments

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 7

Submitted CMR or Module 5 of the SMR Semi-annually

3.2.2 RA 6969 (Title II – Chemical Management)

This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 8

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 9

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 10

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 11

Met SQI Clearance Conditions

With Valid PMPIN Compliance Certificate

Met PMPIN Compliance Certificate Conditions

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 12

Met PCL Compliance Certificate Conditions

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Mercury and Mercury

With Valid Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance

Met Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions