FLOOD DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF PASIG CITY

SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE

Part I: Demographic Profile (Background of Respondent[s])

Direction: Please put a check (/) mark on the space provided that fits your profile or provide data on the
space provided as indicated.

Name:_______________________________________________ (Optional)
Barangay:____________________________________________

1. Demographic profiles of local government units respond to disasters?

1.1. Age ( ) 18-25 years old ( ) 36-40 years old

( ) 26-30 years old ( ) 41-45 years old
( ) 31-35 years old ( ) 46 yrs old and above
1.2. Gender ( ) Male ( ) Female

1.3. Government ( ) Barangay ( ) City Hall Employees

Affiliation ( ) Barangay Disaster Coordinating Council
( ) Others, please specify:__________________________

1.4. Position Held ( ) Chairman ( ) Councilor

( ) Department Head ( ) Committee Member
( ) Others, please specify:__________________________

1.5. Length of ( ) 3 years & below ( ) 12 years & above

Service ( ) 4-7 years
( ) 8-11 years

Part II. Questions on aspects of Flood Disaster Risk Management-Disaster Risk Reduction (DRM-
DRR)
Direction: Kindly provide applicable answers to the space provided after each statement or place a check
mark on the box provided as stated.

2. Over all evaluation of Flood Disaster Risk Management- Disaster Risk Reduction (DRM-DRR)
program of Pasig City on the following?

5- Very effective 4- Effective 3- Moderately Effective

2-Slightly Effective 1-Not Effective
Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Prevention and Mitigation
Emergency Preparedness and risk
reduction
Emergency Response
Rehabilitation and recovery

3. What are the problems encountered in the implementation of the flood Disaster Risk Management-
Disaster Risk reduction (DRM-DRR) program?

5- Strongly Agree 4- Agree 3- Moderately Agree

2- Disagree 1- Strongly disagree
ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 1 of 6
Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013
 Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Budget
Political will (Leadership of Officials)
Awareness thru education & information
Community participation
Community resistance (community are continuously
refusing to changes and program implemented by
government)
Lack of disaster management plan
Manpower
Delayed implementation of project
Poor implementation of law
Insufficient assistance from National Government
Lack of coordination between LGU, NGO,NG &
other agency
Others, if any please specify

4. What does the flood disaster risk reduction and management program need in terms of the following?:

4.1. Program objectives. Based on your experience, how effective the City’s current Disaster Risk
Management-Disaster Risk Reduction program attain its stated goals?
(Note: The objectives used are adopted from Pasig City Flood Plan of 2012)

5- Very effective 4- Effective 3- Moderately Effective

2- Slightly Effective 1- Not Effective
Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Save lives of people at risk?
Reduce immediate threats to life, public health and
safety, and public private property?
Provide necessary care, shelter, and medical
services to Pasig City residents and other members
of the general public?
Restore the operations of facilities, whether public
or privately owned for health, safety, and welfare of
community (e.g. Hospital, utilities, transportation)?
Assess damage to infrastructure, public facilities,
and the built environment and needs?
Expedite the restoration of services, the economy,
and the community at large; and begin the process
of recovery?
Keep the public information
Others, if any please specify

4.2. Program resources

4.2.1. What is the level of responsiveness of staff/personnel for Disaster Risk Management-
Disaster Risk Reduction of Pasig City?
(Note: The criterion used was adopted from Pasig City Flood Plan of 2012)

ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 2 of 6

Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013
 5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive
2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Transportation Personnel
Communication Personnel
Public Works and Engineering Personnel
Fire fighting Personnel
Emergency management & information
management
Mass care, Housing and human services personnel
Resource Support Personnel
Public Health and Medical Services Personnel
Urban Search and Rescue Personnel
Hazardous materials Response personnel
Natural Resources Personnel
Public safety and Security personnel
Recovery management task force
Relief Volunteers
Disaster Management trainers
Logistics Officer
Experts (i.e., Forecasting specialists, surveyors,
slope stability experts)
Others, please specify

4.2.2. How sufficient are the physical resources for emergency response in a disaster situation?

5-Very Sufficient 4- Sufficient 3- Moderately Sufficient

2- Slightly Sufficient 1- Not Sufficient

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Life Savings jacket
Life saving buoys
Rescue boat
Search light
Water proof battery
Generators
Diving Suit
Ambulance
Vehicles (Transportation)
Early warning device
Portable toilets
Evacuation Area
Fire alarm system
Telephone Services
Health facilities
Others, if any please specify

ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 3 of 6

Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013
 4.2.3. How sufficient are the funding for flood DRR-DRM programs to minimize impacts and
increase capacity building in pre, actual and post disaster recovery processes?

5-Very Sufficient 4- Sufficient 3- Moderately Sufficient

2- Slightly Sufficient 1- Not Sufficient

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Prevention and Mitigation
Emergency Preparedness and risk
reduction
Emergency Response
Rehabilitation and recovery

4.3. Program activities

4.3.1. Prevention and Mitigation. Based on your experiences on the pas disaster, what Disaster
Risk Management-Disaster Risk Reduction (DRM-DRR) plans are needed for your areas?

5- Strongly Agree 4- Agree 3- Moderately Agree

2- Disagree 1- Strongly disagree

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Hazard Mapping and urban planning
Education and Awareness
Sufficient shelter food & cloths
Antibiotics and medical kits
Transportation to help the effected people
Community involvement and participation
Infrastructure
Declogging of water ways and canals
Dredging of rivers
Early warning mechanism
Others, if any please specify

4.3.2. Emergency preparedness and risk reduction. What is the level of responsiveness of
Flood DRR-DRM program for disaster risk factors at the community level?

5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive

2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1

The communities that organize themselves to

monitor potential disaster
The warning systems in place to the
community level?
The communities understand official
warning and react?
The community vulnerable have evacuation

ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 4 of 6

Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013
 plans/maps?
The training, simulation exercise, or local
drills conducted, at the community level?
The training conducted at the community
level?
The disaster awareness and public
information projects or programmes being
undertaken to the community?

4.3.3. Emergency Response. Based on your experience, what is the extent of responsiveness of
plan for life preservation and supply of the basic needs of affected population during the
actual and immediately after the disaster occurrence?

5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive

2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Relief operation
Search and rescue
Dissemination/Information sharing of
disaster related information
Development/provision of temporary
shelter
Health service
Psycho social support
Early recovery mechanism
Management of dead and missing
Evacuation management
Social protection intervention
Civil & uniformed services
coordination

4.3.4. Rehabilitation and recovery. How efficient was the government action taken to restore
and improved the living conditions of the affected residents?

5- Very Efficient 4- Efficient 3- Moderately Efficient

2- Slightly Efficient 1- Not Efficient

Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 1
Livelihood for affected victims
Search and retrieval
Shelter/Relocation for affected victims
Psycho Social Counseling
Infrastructure and Relocation plan
Post disaster need assessment
Environmental Protection
Others, please specify

ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 5 of 6

Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013
Part III. Recommendation

Direction: Please indicate your answer to the space provided correspond to the question.

5. What realistic changes can be made in your existing disaster program so as to make it even more
effective?

_____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

ROBAS, Robert John O. Page 6 of 6

Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration
Rizal Technological University, 2013