Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MINUTE Given On 20th of May 2019 Regarding The Quote of Civil Parties
MINUTE Given On 20th of May 2019 Regarding The Quote of Civil Parties
MINUTE Given On 20th of May 2019 Regarding The Quote of Civil Parties
MINUTE
The Court has the task of solving the claim formulated by the petitioners
Tunea Daniel, Cipleu Mihaela, Morariu Violeta Otelia and S.C. Euromobile SRL Sinandrei
– in bankruptcy procedure – represented by the insolvency administrator SCP Alfa &
Quantum Consulting SPRL. The claim has the object of finding the lawful cessation of the
seizure measures, instituted in the criminal prosecution case no. 220D/P/2009 by the
Public Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice –
Directorate for the Investigation of Organised Crime and Terrorism (DIICOT) – Timisoara
Territorial Service.
- There are lawyers Ruxandra Boniu and Sebastian Ionut Cazacu - both members of
Bucharest Bar Association, in representation of intimates/civil parties Exclusive
Agro Line SRL (former Aton Transilvania SRL), SC ATON GMBH and SC VITAL &
Heyl DRL.
- There are missing respondents/ civil parties: Helmig Lutz Mario, represented by
lawyer Vania Zabou from Bucharest Bar Association; SC Agrocereal Carani SRL – in
bankruptcy procedure and SC CER Oil Carani SRL – represented by the insolvency
administrator C.I.I. Herciu Marius Emilian and A&A Consultants IPURL.
Lawyer Tiliciu Daniel Iulian, for the petitioners, shows he observed that
National Tax Administration Agency (ANAF) was quoted for the case, and he claims that
the Agency has no quality or interest in the case file, so he requested to be omitted to
quote the Agency as a respondent.
The lawyer of the petitioners also states that it is not necessary to quote
Helmig Lutz Mario as civil party, motivated by the content of the criminal decision no.
906/29.11.2018 given by Alba Iulia Court of Appeal, through which were left unsolved
only the civil actions claimed by the following civil parties: SC Aton GMBH Fulda, SC
Exclusiv Agro Line SRL, SC Cer Oil Carani SRL, SC Agrocereal Carani SRL and SC Vital &
Heyl SA; and the other provisions of the appealed criminal sentence were mantained.
In reply, lawyers Ruxandra Boniu and Sebastian Ionut Cazacu shows that it
is also necessary to quote Helmig Lutz Mario as civil party, motivated by the fact that
the failure to indicate his name in the content of the decision is an omission, this person
having the status of a civil party and also, reported to the accquital solution based on
the provisions of article 16, letter B, first thesis Criminal Procedural Law – which imply
that the unsolved solution of the civil case extends to all civil parties.
In reply, lawyer Tiliciu Daniel showed that the Court of Appeal gave
judgement regarding to the claims of Helmig Lutz Mario as a civil party, and there is not
the case of an omission.
THE COURT
From the reading of the requests for constitution as a civil party filed in
the case file, as well as from the reading of the pronounced sentences it results that
the civil party - Helmig Mario Lutz, although he is not mentioned among the civil
parties in the content of the decision no. 906/2018 given by Alba Iulia Court of Appeal
–according to which the civil action has been left unsolved, may be entitled to claim
indirect damage in connection with the imposed protective measure. In this context, it
is justified to quote this person as civil party.