Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Photonic Laser Propulsion (PLP) : Photon Propulsion Using An Active Resonant Optical Cavity
Photonic Laser Propulsion (PLP) : Photon Propulsion Using An Active Resonant Optical Cavity
net/publication/269160921
CITATIONS READS
9 490
1 author:
Young Bae
Y. K. Bae Corporation
85 PUBLICATIONS 1,074 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Young Bae on 20 November 2018.
Nomenclature
8
c = light velocity, 3 x 10 m/sec
FT = photon thrust
g = the gravity acceleration constant, 9.8 m/sec2
h = the Plank constant
Isp = specific impulse
L = maximum acceleration distance
λ = photon wavelength
M = spacecraft mass
•
M = photon mass flow rate
N = photon number flux
ν = photon frequency
P = extracavity laser output power
r = mirror diameter
R = output coupler mirror reflectance
S = apparent photon thrust amplification factor
FT
I sp = •
, (1)
gM
•
where FT is the photon thrust, g is the gravity acceleration constant, and M is the mass flow rate. For Photonic
Propulsion, FT of photon flux is given by:
Nhν
FT = , (2)
c
where N is the photon number flux, h is the Plank constant, and ν is the photon frequency. To be simplistic, here we
assume that all photons have a single frequency, ν. The mass flow of the photons is different from that of the non-
relativistic fuel exhaust particles, because the photon does not have a rest mass. However, in the relativistic sense,
the mass and energy are equivalent, and when the rocket emit photons, it loses small amount of mass through the
•
energy loss. Thus, according to the mass-energy equivalence principle, E = mc2, the equivalent mass flow M of
photons is given by:
• Nhν
M= . (3)
c2
By combining Eqs. 2 and 3 with Eq. 1, one obtains:
c
I sp = = 3.06 ×107 sec . (4)
g
Although photons have the highest Isp, the specific thrust, defined here as the thrust to power ratio, of photonic
propulsion is many orders of magnitude smaller than conventional propulsion including electrical and beamed-
energy propulsion. The specific thrust of the photon propulsion, Fs is given by:
FT 1
Fs = = . (5)
Nhν c
Fig. 1 shows the thrust to power ratio, which is defined as specific thrust here, of electric thrusts that include Hall
thrusters and Pulsed Plasma Thrusters, and that of photon thrusters. The specific thrust of the photon thruster is
several orders of magnitude smaller than that of conventional electrical thrusters, because it has the highest Isp. The
green line in Fig. 1 represents 1/Isp curve that shows the general behavior of the specific thrusts of various electric
thrusters as well as that of the photon thruster. Therefore, the inefficiency in producing thrust at extremely high Isp,
is a universal tendency (the law of physics) in all thrusters, and it is not unique in the photon thruster. In other
words, if conventional electric thrusters can be made to have Isp~107 sec, theirs specific thrust would be similar to
that of photon thrusters.
-1 X 20,000
10
X 10,000
Specific Thrust (mN/W)
-2
10
X 1,000
Photon Thrusters
-3 Electric Thrusters
10
X 100
-4
10
-5
10
-6
10
-7
10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Isp (sec)
Figure 1. Specific thrusts as functions of Isp of various conventional and photon thrusters.
To generate enough thrust to accelerate spacecraft, traditional Photon Propulsion concepts require extremely
high power beams of photons possibly generated from either the large solar collectors2 or nuclear power generators.3
These approaches require large scale and extremely heavy space structures, and their implementation may be
possibly many decades away or may not be economically viable. Antimatter based photon propulsion was also
considered,4 but the practical antimatter fuel production, storage, and engine were estimated to be 100 years away.
One way of making photon propulsion more viable to the near-term applications, is overcoming the inherent
inefficiency in producing thrust of the photon thruster by amplifying the momentum transfer of photons by bouncing
or trapping photons between two high reflectance mirrors that form an optical cavity. As shown in Fig. 1, if the
photon thrust amplification is more than 1,000, the specific thrust of the photon thruster starts to compete favorably
with the electric thrusters with much lower Isp. Although the photon propulsion based on this kind of multiple
reflections of laser beams is highly attractive, it turned out that the implementation of the concept is not
straightforward. Two types of optical cavities for amplification of the thrust of Photon Propulsion have been
around: 1) passive resonant optical cavities, 2) non-resonant optical cavities.
However, the passive resonant optical cavity for photon thrust amplification is not useful for propulsion
applications, because it is highly sensitive to the small changes in the distance5 between the mirrors and mirror
deterioration. This sensitivity was observed in the gravitational detection system with high passive optical Q
cavities, in which even one nanometer perturbation in cavity length sets the system out of resonance and nulls the
photon thrust.7 In addition, the passive resonant optical cavity requires near single-frequency lasers to efficiently
inject the laser through the input mirror. Typically such single-frequency lasers have poor power-to-photon
conversion efficiency. Therefore, it is concluded that the passive resonant cavity photon thruster is impractical for
Photon Propulsion.
W
2W
___ 2W
___
F= F=
C C
W
2NW
___ 2NW
___
F= F=
C C
Figure 3. Schematic diagram illustrating the Herriot-cell-type approach to photon thrust amplification. The
first figure shows the thrust on the first mirror without the second mirror. The second figure shows the laser
beam is bounced once resulting in the thrust of 2W/c. The third figure shows the laser beam is bounced N
times resulting in the thrust amplification by a factor of N. However, as the cavity length and the number of
bouncing increase, the reflected laser beams begin to overlap resulting in Fabry-Perrot-type behavior.
2W
___ 2W
___
F= F=
Tc W
___ Tc
T
G
W Gain
T Medium
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of Photonic Laser Propulsion, which is based on the active resonant optical
cavity approach to photon thrust amplification.
In PLP, the active resonant optical cavity scheme overcomes the technological challenges of passive optical
cavity photon thrusters in propulsion applications. First, in PLP, there is no difficulty in injecting the power into the
cavity, because the laser beam is directly formed within the cavity. Secondly, but more importantly, PLP is
strategically operated in multifrequency-multimode, it is highly stable against the perturbations in cavity parameters,
such as the cavity length.
In PLP, a laser cavity is formed by two mirrors located separately in two spacecraft platforms, the photon thrust,
FT, produced by a laser beam on each mirror is given by:
1
S= . (7)
1− R
The optimum design of the PLP thruster is different from that of the typical laser cavities. The cavity design of
the typical lasers is tailored to maximize the laser output power in the extracavity. Depending on the characteristics
of the gain media, the reflectance of the output mirror (output coupler) is chosen 0.9 – 0.99 for the conventional
laser cavities. To minimize the absorption loss in the gain media, the PLT should be designed to maximize the
intracavity power, thus the gain media should be very thin to minimize the absorption loss in the gain media, similar
to the one used in the state of the art solid state disk lasers used for intracavity second harmonic generation, except
without the need of the frequency doubling crystal. In PLP, thus the thermal management of the gain media
becomes an important issue. In reality, because of the limitation in the laser gain medium and other thermal effect,
the amplification fact should be consider given by Eq. 7 should be considered as upper bounds.
TABLE 1.
Maximum Operation Laser HR Mirror Reflectance Maximum Photon Thrust
Power (extracavity)
10 W 0.9999 (research grade) 670 µN
10 W 0.99995 (typically used super mirror) 1.34 mN
10 W 0.9999998 (with 1 ppm mirror loss) 22.3 mN
One primary application of PLT is in a nano-meter accuracy formation flight method with photon thrusters and
tethers, Photon Tether Formation Flight (PTFF), with the maximum baseline distance over 10 km for next
generation space applications.12,13 PTFF is stabilized by PLTs and tethers, thus it is contamination-free and highly
power efficient, and provides ample mass savings. In addition, PTFF is predicted to be able to provide an
unprecedented angular scanning accuracy of 0.1 micro-arcsec, and the retargeting slewing accuracy better than 1
micro-arcsec for a 1 km baseline formation.12,13 Another important emerging application of PTFF is in distributed
and fractionated spacecraft architecture, such as F-6 System architecture.14,15 Because PLT can be adapted to all-in-
one system for the interferometric ranging, navigation sharing, power sharing, optical communication, force and
torque sharing;14,15 PTFF can minimize the system overhead and necessary service function duplication, the cost,
TABLE 2.
Maximum Operation Laser HR Mirror Reflectance Maximum Photon Thrust
Power (extracavity)
1 kW 0.9999 (research grade) 0.670 N
1 kW 0.99995 (typically used super mirror) 1.34 N
1 kW 0.9999998 (with 1 ppm mirror loss) 22.3 N
In this scenario, the parent spacecraft platform would carry 1 kW PLP engine, and the daughter spacecraft
platform the HR mirror system. The deceleration can be performed by forming the PLP optical cavity at a
determined distance.
Table 3 shows examples of maximum theoretical thrusts obtained by PLP engines at various extracavity laser
powers for spacecraft acceleration applications. For estimating the theoretical limit on maximum intracavity laser
power and the corresponding thrust, other parameters including thermal limitation and optical absorption and
saturation of the laser gain media are neglected, and results of the maximum theoretical thrusts as a function of the
reflectance of the mirrors at an extracavity laser power of 10 MW are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Maximum Operation Laser HR Mirror Reflectance Maximum Theoretical Thrust
Power (extracavity)
10 MW 0.9999 (research grade) 670 N
10 MW 0.99995 (typically used super mirror) 1.34 kN
10 MW 0.9999998 (with 1 ppm mirror loss) 22.3 kN
When the mass of the launching system is much greater than the mass of the spacecraft, the spacecraft maximum
velocity, Vmax, with PLP, which is much smaller than c, is given by:
2 FT L
Vmax = (8)
M
where L is the distance of the acceleration and M is the mass of the launched spacecraft. For example, if the
scattering and absorption of the optical systems are negligible, with 10 MW laser system, 0.99995 reflectance
mirrors, M = 1 kg, and L=1,000 km, Vmax > 51.8 km/sec. The same system with 0.999998 reflectance mirrors will
have Vmax > 200 km/sec. PLP can be used for deep-space rapid turn-around probing missions, which does not
require deceleration. Under this velocity the PLP spacecraft will transit the 100 million km to Mars in less than 6
days. The acceleration time is only ~10 sec, which is the firing time of the laser system. If we assume 10 % laser
efficiency, the total energy required for the laser without considering cooling system power consumption is 1 GJ.
Therefore, this PLP can be used for rapid outcome deep space missions. PLP can be scaled up for much larger
r1r2
L= (9)
λ
where r1 and r2 are the radii of the laser beam projected on the mirrors, and λ is the wavelength of the laser. For
example, λ = 10-6 m, L= 1,000 km, if the mirror radius of the launched spacecraft is 0.2 m, the required minimum
radius of the launching system mirror is 5 m. For L = 1,000 km system, various numerical examples of the mirror
radius requirements are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4
Launched System Mirror Radius Required Launching System Mirror Radius
1m 1m
0.5 m 2m
0.2 m 5m
0.1 m 10 m
The diameters and weights of these mirrors have to be chosen strategically depending on mission characteristics.
For small spacecraft with a weight in the order of 1 kg, probably the maximum allowable diameter of mirror due to
the weight limitation would be ~ 0.1 to 0.2 m, requiring the launching system mirror diameter to be 5-10 m. The
fabrication of the high quality super mirrors with radii in the order of 1 m is well within the currently available state-
of-the-art mirror manufacturing technologies, and based on the current space telescope mirror technology, the
availability of super mirrors with diameters of 5 – 10 m seems likely to happen in the near future. Therefore, the
present invention can be used to maintain the intersatellite distances of ~1,000 km. However, if the large diameter
mirrors can be fabricated and carried in the larger satellite platforms, there is no physical limit on the intersatellite
distance.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Internal Research Fund of Bae Institute.
References
1
Tsander, K., “From a Scientific Heritage,” NASA TTF-541, 1967 (quoting a 1924 report from Tsander)
2
Forward, R. L., “Solar Photon Thruster,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 28, 1990. p411.
3
Gulevich, A. V., Ivanov, E. A., Kukharchuk, O. F., Poupko V. Y., and Zrodnikov, A. V., “Application of nuclear photon
engines for deep-space exploration,” Space Technology and Applications International Forum, AIP Conference Proceedings,
Volume 552, 2001, pp. 957-962 .
4
Wickman, J. H., “Technology Assessment of Photon Propulsion: How Close Are We?”, Joint AIAA/SAE/ASME
Conference, 1981, AIAA-81-1532.
5
Fowles, G. R., Introduction to Modern Optics, Holt, Rinvehart and Winston, Inc., New York, New York., 1975, Chap. 4.