Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 44

Teaching and Researching Autonomy

AP P LI ED LI NGU I STIC S I N AC TION

General Editors:

Christopher N. Candlin and David R. Hall

Books published and forthcoming in this series include:

Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning Ken Beatty


Teaching and Researching Autonomy Philip Benson
Teaching and Researching Motivation Zoltán Dörnyei and
Ema Ushioda
Teaching and Researching Reading William Grabe and
Fredricka Stoller
Teaching and Researching Lexicography R. K. K. Hartmann
Teaching and Researching Translation Basil Hatim
Teaching and Researching Speaking Rebecca Hughes
Teaching and Researching Writing Ken Hyland
Teaching and Researching Language and Culture Joan Kelly Hall
Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies Rebecca Oxford
Teaching and Researching Listening Michael Rost
Teaching and Researching
Autonomy

Second edition

Phil Benson
First published 2001 by Pearson Education Limited
Second edition published in Great Britain in 2011

Published 2013 by Routledge


2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

Copyright © 2001, 2011, Taylor & Francis.

The rights of Philip Benson to be identified as author of this


work has been asserted by him in accordance with the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or
by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission
in writing from the publishers.

Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.

Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In
using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of
others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.

To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products
liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products,
instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.

ISBN 13: 978-1-4082-0501-3 (pbk)

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data


A CIP catalogue record for this book can be obtained from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data


Benson, Phil, 1955–
Teaching and researching autonomy / Phil Benson. – 2nd ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4082-0501-3 (pbk.)
1. Learning, Psychology of. 2. Autonomy (Psychology) 3. Language and
languages–Study and teaching. I. Title.
LB1060.B45 2011
418.001′9–dc22
2010044155

Typeset in 10.5/12pt Janson by Graphicraft Limited, Hong Kong


Contents

General editors’ preface ix


Author’s acknowledgements xi

Introduction 1
Introduction to the second edition 3

Section I: What is autonomy? 7

1 The history of autonomy in language learning 9


1.1 Origins of the concept 9
1.2 Autonomy and self-access 10
1.3 Autonomy and learner training 11
1.4 Autonomy and individualisation 12
1.5 Autonomy and interdependence 14
1.6 Why autonomy? Why now? 17
1.7 The two faces of autonomy 23

2 Autonomy beyond the field of language education 26

2.1 Educational reform 27


2.2 Adult education 36
2.3 The psychology of learning 38
2.4 The philosophy of personal autonomy 49
2.5 Autonomy in language learning and its sources 56

v
vi TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

3 Defining and describing autonomy 58


3.1 Dimensions of autonomy 59
3.2 Versions of autonomy 62
3.3 Measuring autonomy 65
3.4 Autonomy and culture 69

4 Control as a natural attribute of learning 73


4.1 Self-management in learning 74
4.2 Learner agendas in the classroom 79
4.3 Control of psychological factors influencing learning 81
4.4 The seeds of autonomy 91

5 Dimensions of control 92
5.1 Control over learning management 92
5.2 Control over cognitive processing 100
5.3 Control over learning content 112
5.4 Describing the autonomous learner 117

6 Conclusion 119

Section II: Autonomy in practice 121

7 Fostering autonomy 123


8 Resource-based approaches 127
8.1 Self-access 127
8.2 Tandem learning 131
8.3 Distance learning 133
8.4 Self-instruction 136
8.5 Out-of-class learning 138
8.6 The effectiveness of resource-based learning 141

9 Technology-based approaches 145


9.1 Computer-assisted language learning 146
9.2 The Internet 148
9.3 The effectiveness of technology-based approaches 152
CONTENTS vii

10 Learner-based approaches 154


10.1 Learner development and language learning 156
10.2 Learner development and autonomy 157
10.3 The effectiveness of learner-based approaches 161

11 Classroom-based approaches 163


11.1 Planning classroom learning 164
11.2 Evaluating classroom learning 168
11.3 The nature of control in the classroom 172
11.4 The effectiveness of classroom-based approaches 173

12 Curriculum-based approaches 176


12.1 The process syllabus 176
12.2 Examples of curriculum-based approaches 178
12.3 The effectiveness of curriculum-based approaches 183

13 Teacher-based approaches 185


13.1 Teacher roles 185
13.2 Teacher autonomy 187
13.3 Language advising 191
13.4 Teacher education 193
13.5 The effectiveness of teacher-based approaches 196

14 Conclusion 197

Section III: Researching autonomy 199

15 Research methods and key areas of research 201


15.1 Teachers’ research 201
15.2 Key areas of research 203

16 Case studies 213


16.1 Case study 1. Out-of-class learning 213
16.2 Case study 2. A self-organised language learning
community 218
viii TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

16.3 Case study 3. The discourse of language advising 222


16.4 Case study 4. Self-directed learning in the classroom 226
16.5 Case study 5. Language acquisition in autonomous
classrooms 230
16.6 Case study 6. What do good independent learners do? 235

17 Conclusion 240

Section IV: Resources 241

18 Resources for research and practice 243


18.1 Books, journals and newsletters 243
18.2 Conferences and workshops 244
18.3 Professional organisations 244
18.4 E-mail lists 246
18.5 Web sites 247
18.6 Bibliographies 247
18.7 Self-access centres 248

References 249
Index 278
General editors’ preface

Applied Linguistics in Action, as its name suggests, is a series which


focuses on the issues and challenges to teachers and researchers in a range
of fields in Applied Linguistics and provides readers and users with the
tools they need to carry out their own practice-related research.
The books in the series provide the reader with clear, up-to-date,
accessible and authoritative accounts of their chosen field within Applied
Linguistics. Starting from a map of the landscape of the field, each book
provides information on its main ideas and concepts, competing issues and
unsolved questions. From there, readers can explore a range of practical
applications of research into those issues and questions, and then take up
the challenge of undertaking their own research, guided by the detailed
and explicit research guides provided. Finally, each book has a section
which provides a rich array of resources, information sources and further
reading, as well as a key to the principal concepts of the field.
Questions the books in this innovative series ask are those familiar to all
teachers and researchers, whether very experienced, or new to the fields of
Applied Linguistics.
• What does research tell us, what doesn’t it tell us and what should it tell
us about the field? How is the field mapped and landscaped? What is its
geography?
• How has research been applied and what interesting research possibili-
ties does practice raise? What are the issues we need to explore and
explain?
• What are the key researchable topics that practitioners can undertake?
How can the research be turned into practical action?
• Where are the important resources that teachers and researchers need?
Who has the information? How can it be accessed?

ix
x TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Each book in the series has been carefully designed to be as accessible as


possible, with built-in features to enable readers to find what they want
quickly and to home in on the key issues and themes that concern them.
The structure is to move from practice to theory and back to practice in a
cycle of development of understanding of the field in question.
Each of the authors of books in the series is an acknowledged authority,
able to bring broad knowledge and experience to engage teachers and
researchers in following up their own ideas, working with them to build
further on their own experience.
The first editions of books in this series have attracted widespread praise
for their authorship, their design, and their content, and have been widely
used to support practice and research. The success of the series, and the
realization that it needs to stay relevant in a world where new research is
being conducted and published at a rapid rate, have prompted the com-
missioning of this second edition. This new edition has been thoroughly
updated, with accounts of research that has appeared since the first edition
and with the addition of other relevant additional material. We trust that
students, teachers and researchers will continue to discover inspiration in
these pages to underpin their own investigations.
Chris Candlin & David Hall
General Editors
Author’s acknowledgements

This book is the product of a lifetime of autonomous, and at times not


so autonomous, learning that has always been informed by the thoughts
and words of others. Among those whose conversations I have most valued
while preparing the second edition of this book are my colleagues and
friends in Hong Kong, Japan and the United Kingdom, including Naoko
Aoki, Alice Chik, Lucy Cooker, David Gardner, Fiona Hyland, William
Littlewood, Bruce Morrison, David Nunan, Richard Pemberton, Richard
Smith, Sarah Toogood, Ema Ushioda, Peter Voller and Jean Young. I am
also appreciative of four Ph.D students at the University of Hong Kong,
from whom I have learned a great deal: Nalini Chavali, Joanne Chuk, Andy
Gao, and Peter Huang. I am especially thankful to Felicity Kjisik and Issa
Ying for their input to Chapter 12, to Alice Chik for her advice and
contributions to the preparation of the Second Edition, to Kathy Wong
for her painstaking work on the preparation of the manuscript, and to my
editors at Pearson Education for the hard work that followed its sub-
mission. Above all, I am grateful to the ALIA series editors, Chris Candlin
and David Hall, without whose vision and encouragement this book would
not have been written.

xi
Our pedantic mania for instruction is always leading us to teach children

the things they would learn better of their own accord.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

To Kaz,

who is still hoping that his father will follow Rousseau’s advice.
Introduction

As the theory and practice of language teaching enters a new century, the
importance of helping students become more autonomous in their learn-
ing has become one of its more prominent themes. The idea of autonomy
often provokes strong reactions. To its critics, autonomy is an idealistic
goal and its promotion a distraction from the real business of teaching and
learning languages. To its advocates, autonomy is a precondition for effec-
tive learning; when learners succeed in developing autonomy, they not
only become better language learners but they also develop into more
responsible and critical members of the communities in which they live.
Discussions on autonomy are, however, often characterised by miscon-
ceptions about the nature of the concept and its implementation. For
example, it is often assumed that autonomy implies learning in isolation,
learning without a teacher or learning outside the classroom, such that the
relevance of the concept to language teaching is unclear. Similarly, auton-
omy is often seen as necessarily implying particular skills and behaviours
and particular methods of organising the teaching and learning process.
These misconceptions are, at least in part, a result of terminological and
conceptual confusion within the field itself.
The aim of Teaching and Researching Autonomy is both to clarify and pro-
blematise the concept of autonomy in language learning and its relevance
to the practice of language education. There are certain fundamentals on
which researchers in the field agree: for example, autonomy refers to the
learner’s broad approach to the learning process, rather than to a particular
mode of teaching or learning. There are other issues on which they disagree,
and often agree to disagree, for autonomy is in essence multidimensional
and takes different forms in different contexts of learning. This book thus
aims to establish what research does and does not tell us about autonomy,
so that those who wish to foster it among their learners can engage in
research and practice on an informed basis.

1
2 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Autonomy can be broadly defined as the capacity to take control over one’s
own learning. In the course of this book, I will expand on this definition,
but for the moment it is sufficient to note that autonomy is not a method
of learning, but an attribute of the learner’s approach to the learning
process. As a teacher and researcher who has been involved with the pro-
motion of the idea of autonomy for a number of years, I take the position
that autonomy is a legitimate and desirable goal of language education.
Among the claims made for autonomy, three stand out as being equally
important to theory and practice:

• The concept of autonomy is grounded in a natural tendency for learners


to take control over their learning. As such, autonomy is available to all,
although it is displayed in different ways and to different degrees accord-
ing to the unique characteristics of each learner and each learning situation.
• Learners who lack autonomy are capable of developing it given appro-
priate conditions and preparation. One condition for the development
of autonomy is the availability of opportunities to exercise control over
learning. The ways in which we organise the practice of teaching and
learning therefore have an important influence on the development of
autonomy among our learners.
• Autonomous learning is more effective than non-autonomous learning.
In other words, the development of autonomy implies better language
learning.

In Teaching and Researching Autonomy, I argue that these are claims rather
than facts and that before we accept or reject autonomy as a legitimate goal
of language education, we should examine them carefully. Certain claims
can be substantiated by research evidence, others remain open to research
and some are non-researchable. I also argue that the best research on
autonomy is often not research concerned with ‘grand theory’, but action
research conducted by practising teachers on the specific conditions of
teaching and learning within which they work. In order to do this kind of
action research, we must make some attempt to foster autonomy among
the learners we work with. In doing so we will frequently find ourselves in
a position where we are able, through careful observation and analysis of
empirical data, to contribute to theory.
The book is divided into four sections. Section I focuses on the origins
and development of the concept of autonomy in language learning,
definitions of key terms and research evidence that enables us to describe
autonomy in terms of various dimensions of control over learning. Section
II focuses on evidence for the effectiveness of practices that have been
claimed to foster autonomy. Section III outlines key areas for future
research and presents six case studies of action research in the field of
autonomy. Section IV lists resources that will help researchers and practi-
tioners in the field.
References

Ahearn, L.M. (2001) ‘Language and agency’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 109–
37.
Akaranithi, A. and Punlay, S. (2007) ‘Tensions in policy and practice in self-directed
learning’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language
Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–55.
Alderson, J.C. (2005) Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface between
Learning and Assessment. London: Continuum.
Allford, D. and Pachler, N. (2007) Language, Autonomy and the New Learning
Environments. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Allwright, D. (2003) ‘Exploratory Practice: Rethinking practitioner research in lan-
guage teaching’, Language Teaching Research, 7 (2): 113–31.
Allwright, D. and Hanks, J. (2009) The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to
Exploratory Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allwright, R.L. (1978) ‘Abdication and responsibility in language teaching’, Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 2 (1): 105–21.
Allwright, R.L. (1984) ‘Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? – The interac-
tion hypothesis’. In D.M.S. Singleton and D.G. Little (eds) Language Learning in
Formal and Informal Contexts. Dublin: Irish Association for Applied Linguistics,
pp. 3–18.
Allwright, R.L. (1988) ‘Autonomy and individualization in whole-class instruction’.
In A. Brookes and P. Grundy (eds) Individualization and Autonomy in Language
Learning. ELT Documents, 131. London: Modern English Publications and the
British Council, pp. 35–44.
Alm, A. (2009) ‘Blogging for self-determination with L2 learner journals’. In
M. Thomas (ed.) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning.
Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 202–22.
Altman, H.B. and James, C.V. (eds) (1980) Foreign Language Teaching: Meeting
Individual Needs. Oxford: Pergamon.
Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of
Nationalism. London: Verso.
Andrade, M.S. and Bunker, E.L. (2009) ‘A model for self-regulated distance language
learning’, Distance Education, 30 (1): 47–61.

249
250 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Aoki, N. (1999) ‘Affect and the role of teacher in the development of learner autonomy’.
In J. Arnold (ed.) Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 142–54.
Aoki, N. (2002) ‘Aspects of teacher autonomy: Capacity, freedom, and responsibility’.
In P. Benson and S. Toogood (eds) Learner Autonomy 7: Challenges to Research and
Practice. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 110–24.
Aoki, N. and Hamakawa, Y. (2003) ‘Asserting our culture: Teacher autonomy from a
feminist perspective’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across
Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 240–53.
Aoki, N. and Smith, R.C. (1999) ‘Learner autonomy in cultural context: The case of
Japan’. In S. Cotterall and D. Crabbe (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning:
Defining the Field and Effecting Change. Bayreuth Contributions to Glottodidactics,
Volume 8. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 19–28.
Appel, M.-C. (1999) Tandem Language Learning by E-mail: Some Basic Principles and a
Case Study. CLCS Occasional Paper, 54. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin, Centre for
Language and Communication Studies.
Arnold, J. (ed.) (1999) Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Assinder, W. (1991) ‘Peer-teaching, peer-learning: One model’, ELT Journal, 45 (3):
218–29.
Atkins, K. (ed.) (2005) Self and Subjectivity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Auerbach, E.R. (1995) ‘The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in peda-
gogical choices’. In J.W. Tollefson (ed.) Power and Inequality in Language Education.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–33.
Bailey, K.M. (1983) ‘Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning:
Looking at and through the diary studies’. In H. Seliger and M. Long (eds) Classroom
Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House,
pp. 67–103.
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. (M. Holquist, ed.) Austin, TX:
University of Texas Press.
Barfield, A. and Nix, M. (eds) (2003) Learner and Teacher Autonomy in Japan 1:
Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: Learner Development Special Interest Group of the
Japan Association of Language Teachers.
Barfield, A., Ashwell, T., Carroll, M., Collins, K., Cowie, N., Critchley, M., Head, E.,
Nix, M., Obermeier, A. and Robertson, M.C. (2002) ‘Exploring and defining teacher
autonomy: A collaborative discussion’. In A.S. Mackenzie and E. McCafferty (eds)
Developing Autonomy. Proceedings of the JALT CUE Conference 2001. Tokyo: The
Japan Association for Language Teaching College and University Educators Special
Interest Group, pp. 217–22.
Barkhuizen, G.P. (1998) ‘Discovering learners’ perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/
learning activities in a South African context’, TESOL Quarterly, 32 (1): 85–108.
Barnes, D. (1976) From Communication to Curriculum. London: Penguin.
Bauman, Z. (2004) Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beatty, K. (2010) Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning. 2nd
edn. London: Pearson.
Bekerman, Z., Burbules, N.C. and Silberman-Keller, D. (eds) (2006) Learning in Places:
The Informal Education Reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Benson, P. (1995) ‘A critical view of learner training’, Learning Learning: JALT Learner
Development N-SIG Forum, 2 (2): 2–6.
R E F E R E NC E S 251

Benson, P. (1996) ‘Concepts of autonomy in language learning.’ In R. Pemberton et al.


(eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong
University Press, pp. 27–34.
Benson, P. (1997) ‘The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy’. In P. Benson and
P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman,
pp. 18–34.
Benson, P. (2000) ‘Autonomy as a learners’ and teachers’ right’. In B. Sinclair et al.
(eds) Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. London: Longman,
pp. 111–17.
Benson, P. (ed.) (2007) Learner Autonomy 8: Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Dublin:
Authentik.
Benson, P. (2008) ‘Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives on autonomy’. In T.E. Lamb
and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 15–32.
Benson (2010) ‘Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test?’ In
A. Paran and L. Sercu (eds) Testing the Untestable in Language Education. Bristol:
Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–97.
Benson, P. and Chik, A. (2010) ‘New literacies and autonomy in foreign language
learning’. In M.J. Luzón, N. Ruiz and M.L. Villanueva (eds) Genre Theory and New
Literacies: Applications to Autonomous Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge
Scholars Press, pp. 63–80.
Benson, P., Chik, A. and Lim, H.Y. (2003) ‘Becoming autonomous in an Asian context:
Autonomy as a sociocultural process’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner
Autonomy across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan, pp. 23–40.
Benson, P., Collins, H. and Sprenger, T. (eds) (2008) From Autonomy in Language
Learning to Autonomy in Language Teaching. Special issue of DELTA: Revista de
Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 24.
Benson, P. and Gao, X. (2008) ‘Individual variation and language learning strategies’.
In S. Hurd and T. Lewis (eds) Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings.
Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 25–40.
Benson, P. and Lor, W. (1998) Making Sense of Autonomous Language Learning:
Conceptions of Learning and Readiness for Autonomy. English Centre Monograph,
No. 2. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
Benson, P. and Lor, W. (1999) ‘Conceptions of language and language learning’,
System, 27 (4): 459–72.
Benson, P. and Nunan, D. (eds) (2002) The Experience of Language Learning. Special
issue of The Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (2).
Benson, P. and Nunan, D. (eds) (2005) Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity in
Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, P. and Toogood, S. (eds) (2001) Learner Autonomy 7: Challenges to Research and
Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
Bentley, T. (1998) Learning Beyond the Classroom: Education for a Changing World.
London: Routledge.
Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1989) ‘Intentional learning as a goal of instruction’.
In L.B. Resnick (ed.) Knowing, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum, pp. 361–92.
Bialystok, E. (1994) ‘Analysis and control in the development of second language
proficiency’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16: 157–68.
252 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Black, R.W. (2005) ‘Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of
English-language learners in an online fanfiction community’, Journal of Adolescent
and Adult Literacy, 49 (2): 118–28.
Black, R.W. (2007) ‘Digital design: English language learners and reader reviews in
adolescent fan fiction’. In M. Knobel and C. Lankshear (eds) A New Literacies
Sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 115–36.
Blanche, P. (1988) ‘Self-assessment of foreign-language skills: Implications for teachers
and researchers’, RELC Journal, 19: 75–93.
Blin, F. (2004) ‘CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activitiy-
theoretical perspective’, ReCALL, 16 (2): 377–95.
Block, D. (1996) ‘A window on the classroom: Classroom events viewed from different
angles’. In K. Bailey and D. Nunan (eds) Voices from the Language Classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–94.
Block, D. (2003) The Social Turn in Applied Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Block, D. (2007) Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.
Block, D. and Cameron, D. (eds) (2002) Globalization and Language Teaching. London:
Routledge.
Bonham, L.A. (1991) ‘Guglielmino’s self-directed learning readiness scale: What does
it measure?’ Adult Education Quarterly, 41 (2): 91–9.
Boud, D. (1988) ‘Moving towards autonomy’. In D. Boud (ed.) Developing Student
Autonomy in Learning. 2nd edn. London: Kogan Page, pp. 17–39.
Boud, D., Keough, R. and Walker, D. (eds) (1985) Reflection: Turning Experience into
Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture.
London: Sage.
Boyd, W. (1956) Émile for Today: The Émile of Jean Jacques Rousseau. London: Heinemann.
Brammerts, H. (2003) ‘Autonomous language learning in Tandem: The development
of a concept’. In T. Lewis and L. Walker (eds) Autonomous Language Learning in
Tandem. Sheffield: Academy Electronic Publications, pp. 27–36.
Brantmeier, C. and Vanderplank, R. (2008) ‘Descriptive and criterion-referenced self-
assessment with L2 readers’, System, 36 (3): 456–77.
Breen, M.P. (1986) ‘The social context of language learning: A neglected situation’,
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7: 135–58.
Breen, M.P. (1987) ‘Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design’, Language Teaching,
20 (3): 157–74.
Breen, M.P. (1991) ‘Understanding the language teacher’. In R. Phillipson et al.
(eds) Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters,
pp. 213–33.
Breen, M.P. (ed.) (2001) Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in
Research. London: Longman.
Breen, M.P. and Candlin, C.N. (1980) ‘The essentials of a communicative curriculum
in language teaching’, Applied Linguistics, 1 (2): 89–112.
Breen, M.P., Candlin, C.N., Dam, L. and Gabrielsen, G. (1989) ‘The evolution of a
teacher training programme’. In R.K. Johnson (ed.) The Second Language Curriculum.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–35.
Breen, M.P. and Littlejohn, A. (eds) (2000a) Classroom Decision-making: Negotiation in
the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
R E F E R E NC E S 253

Breen, M.P. and Littlejohn, A. (2000b) ‘The significance of negotiation’. In M.P. Breen
and A. Littlejohn (eds) Classroom Decision-making: Negotiation in the Language
Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5–38.
Breen, M.P. and Mann, S. (1997) ‘Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a peda-
gogy for autonomy’. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in
Language Learning. London: Longman, pp. 132–49.
Bremer, K., Roberts, C., Vasseur, M.-T., Simonot, M. and Broeder, P. (1996) Achieving
Understanding: Discourse in Intercultural Encounters. New York, NY: Longman.
Brewster, E.T. and Brewster, E.S. (1976) Language Acquisition Made Practical: Field
Methods for Language Learners. Pasadena,: Lingua House.
Broady, E. and Kenning, M.-M. (eds) (1996) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University
Language Teaching. London: Association for French Language Studies in association
with CILT.
Brockett, R.G. and Hiemstra, R. (1991) Self-direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on
Theory, Research, and Practice. London: Routledge.
Brookes, A. and Grundy, P. (eds) (1988) Individualization and Autonomy in Language
Learning. ELT Documents, 131. London: Modern English Publications/British
Council.
Brookfield, S. (1981) ‘Independent adult learning’, Studies in Adult Education, 13: 15–27.
Brookfield, S. (1993) ‘Self-directed learning, political clarity, and the critical practice of
adult education’, Adult Education Quarterly, 43 (4): 227–42.
Brookfield, S. (2009) ‘On being taught’. In P. Jarvis (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of
Lifelong Learning. London: Routledge, pp. 214–22.
Brown, J. (2006) ‘Locus of learning and affective strategy use: Two factors affecting
success in self-instructed language learning’, Foreign Language Annals, 39 (4): 640–59.
Budd, R. and Wright, T. (1992) ‘Putting a process syllabus into practice’. In D. Nunan
(ed.) Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 208–29.
Burbules, N.C. (2006) ‘Self-educating communities: Collaboration and learning through
the Internet’. In Z. Bekerman, N.C. Burbules and D. Silberman-Keller (eds) Learning
in Places: The Informal Educational Reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 273–84.
Burkurt, A. and Schwienhorst, K. (2008) ‘Focus on the student teacher: The European
Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) as a tool to develop teacher
autonomy’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2 (3): 238–52.
Burns, A. (1999) Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Buss, S. (2007) ‘Person autonomy’. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Winter 2007 edn. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/
personal-autonomy/>
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY:
Routledge.
Cameron, D. (2002) ‘Globalization and the teaching of communication skills’. In
D. Block and D. Cameron (eds) Globalization and Language Teaching. London:
Routledge, pp. 67–82.
Cameron, L. (2001) Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Camilleri, A. (2000) ‘Learning to learn’. In M. Byram (ed.) Routledge Encyclopaedia of
Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, pp. 351–3.
254 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Candlin, C.N. (1987) ‘Towards task-based language learning’. In C.N. Candlin and
D. Murphy (eds) Language Learning Tasks. London: Prentice Hall, pp. 5–22.
Candy, P.C. (1991) Self-direction for Lifelong Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Carpenter, C. (1996) ‘Peer teaching: A new approach to advanced level language teaching’.
In E. Broady and M.-M. Kenning (eds) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University
Language Teaching. London: Association for French Language Studies/CILT,
pp. 23–38.
Carter, I. (2007) ‘Positive and negative liberty’. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2007 edn. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/
win2007/entries/liberty-positive-negative/>
Chamot, A.U., Küpper, L. and Impink-Hernandez, M.V. (1988) A Study of Learning
Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction: Findings of the Longitudinal Study. MacLean,
VA: Interstate Research Associates.
Chamot, A.U. and Rubin, J. (1994) ‘Comments on Janie Rees-Miller’s “A critical
appraisal of learner training: theoretical bases and teaching implications”: Two readers
react’, TESOL Quarterly, 28 (4): 771–6.
Champagne, M.F., Clayton, T., Dimmitt, N., Laszewski, M., Savage, W., Shaw, J.,
Sroupe, R., Thien, M.M. and Walter, P. (2001) ‘The assessment of learner auton-
omy and language learning’, The AILA Review, 15: 45–55.
Chang, L.Y.H. (2007) ‘The influences of group processes on learners’ autonomous
beliefs and behaviours’, System, 35 (3): 322–37.
Chapelle, C. (1997) ‘CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms’,
Language Learning and Technology, 1 (1): 19–38.
Chen, Y.-M. (2008) ‘Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitu-
dinal case study’. Language Teaching Research, 12 (2): 235–62.
Chu, P.-Y. (2007) ‘How students react to the power and responsibility of being deci-
sion makers in their own learning’, Language Teaching Research, 11 (2): 225–41.
Clarke, D.F. (1991) ‘The negotiated syllabus: What it is and how is it likely to work?’,
Applied Linguistics, 12 (1): 13–28.
Clemente, M. (2003) ‘Learning cultures and counselling: Teacher/learner interaction
within a self-directed scheme’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner
Autonomy across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan, pp. 201–19.
Cockburn, A. and Blackburn, R. (eds) (1970) Student Power: Problems, Diagnosis, Action.
London: Penguin.
Cohen, A.D. (1998) Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. London: Longman.
Cohen, A.D. and Macaro, E. (eds) (2007) Language Learner Strategies: 30 years of
Research and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conacher, J.E. and Kelly-Holmes, H. (eds) (2005) New Learning Environments for
Language Learning: Moving beyond the Classroom. Franfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Confessore, G.J. and Park, E.M. (2004) ‘Factor validation of the learner autonomy
profile (Version 3.0) and extraction of the short form’, International Journal of Self-
Directed Learning, 1 (1): 39–58.
Confessore, G.J., Park, E.M. and Idobro, I. (2005) ‘Initial component analysis
and reliability assessment of the Spanish language learner autonomy profile’,
International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 2 (2): 91–101.
Corder, S.P. (1967) ‘The significance of learners errors’, International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 4: 161–9.
R E F E R E NC E S 255

Cotterall, S. (1995) ‘Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs’, System,


23 (2): 195–206.
Cotterall, S. (1999) ‘Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about
them’, System, 27 (4): 593–613.
Cotterall, S. (2000) ‘Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles
for designing language courses’, ELT Journal, 54 (2): 109–17.
Cotterall, S. (2005) ‘It’s just rules . . . that’s all it is at this stage’. In P. Benson and
D. Nunan (eds) Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity in Language Learning.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–18.
Cotterall, S. (2008) ‘Autonomy and good language learners’. In C. Griffiths (ed.) Lessons
from Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–20.
Cotterall, S. and Reinders, H. (2001) ‘Learners’ perceptions and practice in self access
language learning’, TESOLANZ Journal, 8: 23–38.
Coyle, D. (2003) ‘Managing the differentiated classroom: Differentiation and learner
autonomy’. In M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb (eds) Differentiation in the Modern
Languages Classroom. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 165–75.
Crabbe, D. (1993) ‘Fostering autonomy from within the classroom: The teacher’s
responsibility’, System, 21 (4): 443–52.
Crabbe, D., Hoffman, A. and Cotterall, S. (2001) ‘Examining the discourse of learner
advisory sessions’, The AILA Review, 15: 2–15.
Cram, B. (1995) ‘Self-assessment: from theory to practice. Developing a workshop
guide for teachers’. In G. Brindley (ed.) Language Assessment in Action. Sydney:
Macquarie University, NCELTR, pp. 271–306.
Dakin, J. (1973) The Language Laboratory and Language Learning. London: Longman.
Dam, L. (1995) Learner Autonomy 3: From Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin:
Authentik.
Dam, L. (ed.) (2001) Learner Autonomy: New insights/Autonomy de l’apprenant: Nouvelle
pistes. Special Issue of AILA Review, 15.
Dam, L. and Gabrielsen, G. (1988) ‘Developing learner autonomy in a school context
– a six-year experiment beginning in the learners’ first year of English’. In H. Holec
(ed.) Autonomy and Self-directed Learning: Present Fields of Application. Strasbourg:
Council of Europe, pp. 19–30.
Dam, L. and Legenhausen, L. (1996) ‘The acquisition of vocabulary in an autonomous
learning environment – the first months of beginning English’. In R. Pemberton
et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong
University Press, pp. 265–80.
Darasawang, P., Singhasiri, W. and Keyuravong, S. (2007) ‘Developing student sup-
port in self-access centres’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy
in Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
pp. 167–79.
Deacon, B. and Croker, R. (2006) ‘Peer teaching for a change: It’s in your hands’. In
E. Skier and M. Kohyama (eds) More Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner
Development SIG, pp. 97–112.
Deci, E.L. (1978) ‘Applications of research on the effects of rewards’. In M. Lepper and
D. Greene (eds) The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of
Human Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 193–203.
Deci, E.L. and Flaste, R. (1995) Why We Do What We Do: The Dynamics of Personal
Autonomy. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
256 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (eds) (2000) Handbook of Self-Determination Research:
Theoretical and Applied Issues. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G. and Ryan, R.M. (1991) ‘Motivation and
education: The self-determination perspective’, Educational Psychologist, 26: 325–46.
De Graff, R. (1997) ‘The EXPERANTO experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on
second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19: 249–76.
DeKeyser, R.M. (2007) ‘Study abroad as foreign language practice’. In R.M. DeKeyser
(ed.) Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Lingusitics and Cognitive
Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–26.
Dewey, J. (1916/1966) Democracy and Education and Introduction to the Philosophy of
Education. New York, NY: Free Press. (First published, 1916.)
Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think. Chicago, IL: Regney.
Dickinson, L. (1987) Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Dickinson, L. (1992) Learner Autonomy 2: Learner Training for Language Learning.
Dublin: Authentik.
Dickinson, L. (1995) ‘Autonomy and motivation: A literature review’, System, 23 (2):
165–74.
Dickinson, L. and Carver, D. (1980) ‘Learning how to learn: Steps towards self-direction
in foreign language learning’, ELT Journal, 35 (1): 1–7.
Dlaska, A. and Krekeler, C. (2008) ‘Self-assessment of pronunciation’, System, 36 (4):
506–16.
Dodge, B. (1998) ‘Some thoughts about WebQuests’. Paper published online.
Retrieved from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html, August 2009.
Donato, R. and McCormick, D. (1994) ‘A sociocultural perspective on language
learning strategies: The role of mediation’, The Modern Language Journal, 78 (4):
453–64.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998) ‘Motivation in second and foreign language learning’, Language
Teaching, 31: 117–35.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001) Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003) ‘Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning:
Advances in theory, research, and applications’, Language Learning, 53 (2): 3–32.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005) The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in
Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. and Csizér, L. (1998) ‘Ten commandments for motivating language learners:
Results of an empirical study’, Language Teaching Research, 2 (3): 203–29.
Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds) (2009) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self.
Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (2010) Teaching and Researching Motivation. 2nd edn.
London: Longman.
Dunkel, A., Brill, S., and Kohl, B. (2002) ‘The impact of self-instructional technology
on language learning: A view of NASILP’. In C.A. Spreen (ed.) New Technologies
and Language Learning: Cases in the Less Commonly Taught Languages. Honolulu, HI:
University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre,
pp. 97–120.
Ecclestone, K. (2002) Learning Autonomy in Post-16 Education: The Politics and Practice of
Formative Assessment. London: Routledge Falmer.
R E F E R E NC E S 257

Egbert, J. (2005) CALL Essentials: Principles and Practice in the CALL Classrooms.
Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Egbert, J. and Hanson-Smith, E. (eds) (1999) CALL Environments: Research, Practice and
Critical Issues. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Ehrman, M., Leaver, B.L. and Oxford, R. (2003) ‘A brief overview of individual differ-
ences in second language learning’, System, 31 (4): 313–30.
Ellis, G. and Sinclair, B. (1989) Learning to Learn English: A Course in Learner Training.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2004) ‘Individual differences in second language learning’. In A. Davies and
C. Elder (eds) The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 525–51.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (eds) (1999) Perspectives on Activity
Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esch, E. (1996) ‘Promoting learner autonomy: Criteria for the selection of appropriate
methods’. In R. Pemberton et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language
Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 35–48.
Esch, E. (1997) ‘Learner training for autonomous language learning’. In P. Benson and
P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman,
pp. 164–76.
Felix, U. (2005) ‘Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research: Towards a common
agenda’, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (1/2): 1–32.
Fernández-Toro, M. (1999) Training Learners for Self-instruction. London: CILT.
Fernández-Toro, M. and Jones, F.R. (1996) ‘Going solo: Learners’ experiences of
self-instruction and self-instruction training’. In E. Broady and M.-M. Kenning (eds)
Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching. London: Association
for French Language Studies/CILT, pp. 185–214.
Fernández-Toro, M. and Jones, F.R. (2001) DIY Techniques for Language Learners.
London: CILT.
Field, L.D. (1989) ‘An investigation into the structure, validity and reliability of
Guglielmino’s Self-directed Learning Readiness Scale’, Adult Education Quarterly,
39 (3): 125–39.
Figura, K. and Jarvis, H. (2007) ‘Computer-based materials: A study of learner auton-
omy and strategies’, System, 35 (4): 448–68.
Fisher, D., Hafner, C. and Young, J. (2007) ‘Integrating independent learning: Lessons
learned and implications for the classroom’. In D. Gardner (ed.) Learner Autonomy
10: Integration and Support. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 33–55.
Freeman, D. and Cornwell, S. (eds) (1993) New Ways in Teacher Education. Alexandria,
VA: TESOL.
Freinet, E. (1971) Naissance d’une pédagogie populaire. Paris: Maspéro.
Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
Freire, P. (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward.
Fryer, L. and Carpenter, R. (2006) ‘Emerging technologies: Bots as language learning
tools’, Language Learning and Technology, 10 (3): 8–14.
Gao, X. (2004) ‘A critical review of questionnaire use in learner strategy research’,
Prospect, An Australian Journal of TESOL, 19 (3): 3–14.
Gao, X. (2007) ‘A tale of Blue Rain Café: A study on the online narrative construction
about a community of English learners on the Chinese mainland’, System, 35 (2):
259–70.
258 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Gao, X. (2009) ‘English corner as an out-of-class learning activity’, English Language


Teaching Journal, 63 (1): 60–7.
Gao, X., Cheng, H. and Kelly, P. (2008) ‘Supplementing an uncertain investment?
Chinese alliances for English language learning’, Journal of Asia Pacific
Communication, 18 (1): 9–29.
Gardner, D. (2007) ‘Integrating self-access learning into an ESP course’. In D. Gardner
(ed.) Learner Autonomy 10: Integration and Support. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 8–32.
Gardner, D. and Miller, L. (1999) Establishing Self-Access: From Theory to Practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, R.C. and Lambert, W.E. (1972) Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language
Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Garrison, D.R. (1992) ‘Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education:
An analysis of responsibility and control issues’, Adult Education Quarterly, 42 (3):
136–48.
Garton, S. (2002) ‘Learner initiative in the language classroom’, ELT Journal, 56 (1):
47–56.
Geddes, M. and Sturtridge, G. (eds) (1982) Individualisation. London: Modern English
Publications.
Gee, J.P. (2004) Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling.
London: Routledge.
Gergen, K.J. (1991) The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New
York, NY: Basic Books.
Gibbons, M., Bailey, A., Comeau, P., Schmuck, J., Seymour, S. and Wallace, D. (1980)
‘Toward a theory of self-directed learning: A study of experts without formal
training’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 20 (2): 41–56.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2007) ‘Emerging technologies: Tools and trends in self-paced
language instruction’, Language Learning and Technology, 11 (2): 10–17.
Graves, N. and Vye, S. (2006) ‘Professionalism is personal: How teachers in Japan help
themselves develop through self-reflection practices’. In E. Skier and M. Kohyama
(eds) More Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner Development SIG, pp. 155–74.
Gremmo, M.-J. and Castillo, D. (2006) ‘Advising in a multilingual setting: New per-
spectives for the role of the advisor’. In T. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Supporting
Independent Learning: Issues and Interventions. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 21–36.
Gremmo, M.-J. and Riley, P. (1995) ‘Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in
language teaching and learning: The history of an idea’, System, 23 (2): 151–64.
Griffiths, C. (ed.) (2008) Lessons from Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Gross, J.J. (1998) ‘The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review’,
Review of General Psychology, 2 (3): 271–99.
Guglielmino, L.M. (1977) Development of the Self-directed Learning Readiness Scale.
PhD Thesis, University of Georgia.
Guglielmino, L.M. (1989) ‘Guglielmino responds to Field’s investigation’, Adult
Education Quarterly, 39 (4): 235–40.
Guth, S. (2009) ‘Personal learning environments for language learning’. In M. Thomas
(ed.) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning. Hershey, PA:
Information Science Reference, pp. 451–71.
R E F E R E NC E S 259

Guyer, P. (2003) ‘Kant on the theory and practice of autonomy’. In E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller
and J. Paul (eds) Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–98.
Hacker, P. and Barkhuizen, G. (2008) ‘Autonomous teachers, autonomous cognition:
Developing personal theories through reflection in language teacher education’. In
T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities
and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 161–83.
Hafner, C. and Young, J. (2007) ‘From teacher to facilitator: Developing perspectives’.
In L. Miller (ed.) Learner Autonomy 9: Autonomy in the Classroom. Dublin: Authentik,
pp. 103–26.
Hall, D. and Kenny, B. (1988) ‘An approach to a truly communicative methodology:
The AIT pre-sessional course’, English for Specific Purposes, 7: 19–32.
Hammond, M. and Collins, R. (1991) Self-directed Learning: Critical Practice. London:
Kogan Page.
Hampel, R. and Hauck, M. (2004) ‘Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in
distance language courses’, Language Learning and Technology, 8 (1): 66–82.
Hand, M. (2006) ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’, Oxford Review of Education,
32 (4): 535–50.
Hannerz, U. (1996) Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.
Hanson-Smith, E. (ed.) (2000) Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Alexandria,
VA: TESOL.
Harding-Esch, E.M. (ed.) (1977) Self-directed Learning and Autonomy. Report of a
Seminar held at Cambridge, 13–15 December 1976. University of Cambridge,
Department of Linguistics and CRAPEL.
Harding-Esch, E.M. (1982) ‘The open access sound and video library of the University
of Cambridge: Progress report and development’, System, 10 (1): 13–28.
Harmer, J. (2001) The Practice of English Language Teaching. 3rd edn. London: Pearson
Education.
Harri-Augstein, S. and Thomas, L. (1991) Learning Conversations: The Self-organised
Way to Personal and Organizational Growth. London: Routledge.
Harris, R. M. (1990) ‘Reflections on self-directed adult learning: Some implications for
educators of adults’, Studies in Continuing Education, 11 (2): 102–16.
Harris, V., Ingvadottir, H., Jones, B., Neyburg, R., Palos, I. and Schindler, I. (2001)
Helping Learners Learn: Exploring Strategy Instruction in Languages Classrooms across
Europe. Graz, Austria: ECML.
Harrison, M.E. (2006) ‘Taking the teacher out of the test: Exploring student autonomy
in EFL classroom testing’. In E. Skier and M. Kohyama (eds) More Autonomy You
Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner Development SIG, pp. 87–94.
Hart, N. (2002) ‘Developing profiles for intra-group learner autonomy’. In A.S.
Mackenzie and E. McCafferty (eds) Developing Autonomy. Proceedings of the JALT
CUE Conference 2001. Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language Teaching
College and University Educators Special Interest Group, pp. 97–106.
Hassan, X., Macaro, E., Mason, D., Nye, G., Smith, P. and Vanderplank, R. (2005)
Strategy Training in Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Available Research.
Research Evidence in Education Library. London: University of London, Social
Science Research Institute, EPPI-Centre.
Head, E. (2006) ‘Learner autonomy and education reform in Japan: Asking the students’.
In E. Skier and M. Kohyama (eds) More Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner
Development SIG, pp. 9–31.
260 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Hedge, T. (2000) Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Hine, C. (2000) Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
Ho, W.K. (2004) ‘English language teaching in East Asia today: An overview’. In
W.H. Kam and R.Y.L. Wong (eds) English Language Teaching in East Asia Today:
Changing Policies and Practices. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, pp. 1–33.
Holec, H. (1980) ‘Learner training: Meeting needs in self-directed learning’. In
H.B. Altman and C.V. James (eds) Foreign Language Learning: Meeting Individual
Needs. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 30–45.
Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (First
published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.)
Holec, H. (1985a) ‘On autonomy: Some elementary concepts’. In P. Riley (ed.)
Discourse and Learning. London: Longman, pp. 173–90.
Holec, H. (1985b) ‘Self-assessment’. In R.J. Mason (ed.) Self-directed Learning and Self-
access in Australia: From Practice to Theory. Proceedings of the National Conference
of the Adult Migrant Education Programme, Melbourne, June 1984. Melbourne:
Council of Adult Education, pp. 141–58.
Holec, H. (1987) ‘The learner as manager: Managing learning or managing to learn?’
In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. London:
Prentice Hall, pp. 145–56.
Holliday, A. (2003) ‘Social autonomy: Addressing the dangers of culturism in TESOL’.
In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language
Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 110–26.
Holliday, A. (2005) The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Horwitz, E.K. (1987) ‘Surveying student beliefs about language learning’. In
A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. London:
Prentice Hall, pp. 119–29.
Horwitz, E.K. (1988) ‘The beliefs about language learning of beginning university
foreign language students’, The Modern Language Journal, 72 (3): 283–94.
Horwitz, E.K. and Young, D. (1991) Language Learning Anxiety: From Theory and
Research to Classroom Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Howatt, A.P.R. (1984) A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Huang, J. (2010) Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign Language Learning and
Teaching. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hurd, S. (1998) ‘Autonomy at any price? Issues and concerns from a British HE
perspective’, Foreign Language Annals, 31 (2): 219–30.
Hurd, S. (2006) ‘Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance
language learner: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles and
approaches’, Distance Education, 27 (3): 299–325.
Hurd, S. (2007a) ‘Anxiety and non-anxiety in a distance language learning environ-
ment: The distance factor as a modifying influence’, System, 35 (4): 487–508.
Hurd, S. (2007b) ‘Distant voices: Learners’ stories about the affective side of learning
a language at a distance’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2): 242–59.
Hurd, S. (2008) ‘Affect and strategy use in independent language learning’. In S. Hurd
and T. Lewis (eds) Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings. Bristol:
Multilingual Matters, pp. 218–36.
R E F E R E NC E S 261

Hurd, S., Beaven, T. and Ortega, A. (2001) ‘Developing autonomy in a distance


learning context: Issues and dilemmas for course writers’, System, 29 (3): 341–55.
Hurd, S. and Lewis, T. (eds) (2008) Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings.
Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Hurd, S. and Murphy, L. (eds) (2005) Success with Languages. London: Routledge.
Hyland, F. (2004) ‘Learning autonomously: Contextualising out-of-class English
language learning’, Language Awareness, 13 (3): 180–202.
Ibarz, T. and Webb, S. (2007) ‘Listening to learners to investigate the viability of
technology-driven ESOL pedagogy’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching,
1 (2): 208–26.
Illich, I. (1971) Deschooling Society. London: Calder & Boyars.
Jiménez Raya, M. and Lamb, T. (eds) (2008) Pedagogy for Autonomy in Modern
Languages Education: Theory, Practice and Teacher Education. Dublin: Authentik.
Jiménez Raya, M., Lamb, T. and Vieira, F. (2007) Pedagogy for Autonomy in Language
Education in Europe: Towards a Framework for Learner and Teacher Development.
Dublin: Authentik.
Jiménez, M. and Sercu, L. (eds) (2007) Challenges in Teacher Development: Learner
Autonomy and Intercultural Competence. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Jones, F.R. (1993) ‘Beyond the fringe: A framework for assessing teach-yourself
materials for ab initio English-speaking materials’, System, 21: 453–69.
Jones, F.R. (1994) ‘The lone language learner: a diary study’, System, 22: 441–54.
Jones, F.R. (1998) ‘Self-instruction and success: A learner profile study’, Applied
Linguistics, 19 (3): 378–406.
Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A.M.F. (eds) (2003) Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches.
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A.M.F. and Menezes, V. (eds) (2008) Narratives of Learning and
Teaching EFL. London: Palgrave.
Karlsson, L. (2008) Turning the Kaleidoscope: (E)FL Educational Experience and Inquiry
as Auto/biography. Language Centre Publications 1. Helsinki: University of Helsinki
Language Centre.
Karlsson, L. and Kjisik, F. (2007) ‘The role of autobiography in fostering learning and
reflective thinking’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Langu-
age Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 30–42.
Karlsson, L., Kjisik, F. and Nordlund, J. (1997) From Here to Autonomy. Helsinki:
Helsinki University Press.
Karlsson, L., Kjisik, F. and Nordlund, J. (eds) (2000) All together now. Papers from the
7th Nordic Conference and Workshop on Autonomous Language Learning,
September 2000. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Language Centre.
Karlsson, L., Kjisik, F. and Nordlund, J. (2007) ‘Language counselling a critical and
integral component in promoting an autonomous community of learning’, System,
35 (1): 46 –65.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond Modularity. A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive
Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelly, G. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, NY: Norton.
Kelly, G. (1963) A Theory of Personality. New York, NY: Norton.
Kennedy, J. and Pinter, A. (2007) ‘Developing teacher autonomy through teamwork’.
In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education:
Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–21.
262 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Kenning, M.-M. (1996) ‘IT and autonomy’. In E. Broady and M.-M. Kenning (eds)
Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching. London: Association
for French Language Studies/CILT, pp. 121–38.
Kenny, B. (1993) ‘For more autonomy’, System, 21 (4): 431–42.
Kenny, B. and Laszewski, M. (1997) ‘Talkbase in Vientiane’. In B. Kenny and
W. Savage (eds) Language and Development: Teachers in a Changing World. London:
Longman, pp. 129–40.
Kilpatrick, W.H. (1921) The Project Method. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kjisik, F. (2007) ‘Ten years in autonomy: Reflections and research on the ALMS pro-
gramme’. In D. Gardner (ed.) Learner Autonomy 10: Integration and Support. Dublin:
Authentik, pp. 114–26.
Kjisik, F., Voller, P., Aoki, N. and Nakata, Y. (eds) (2009) Mapping the Terrain of
Learner Autonomy: Learning Environments, Learning Communities and Identities.
Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (eds) (2007) A New Literacies Sampler. New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
Knowles, M. (1975) Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York,
NY: Association Press.
Koenraad, T.L.M. and Westoff, G.J. (2003) ‘Can you tell a LanguageQuest when you
see one? Design criteria for TalenQuests’, Paper presented at the European Association
for Computer Assisted Language Learning Conference, University of Limerick, Ireland,
September 2003. <http://www.feo.hvu.nl/koen2/Home/talenquest/TQEurocall.pdf>
Kohonen, V. (1992) ‘Experiential language learning: Second language learning as
cooperative learner education’. In D. Nunan (ed.) Collaborative Language Learning
and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–39.
Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P. and Lehtovaara, J. (2000) Experiential
Learning in Foreign Language Education. London: Longman.
Kolb, A. (2007) ‘How languages are learnt: Primary children’s language learning
beliefs’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (2): 227–41.
Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and
Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kötter, M. (2002) Tandem Learning on the Internet. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Krashen, S. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. (2006) ‘The autonomous language acquirer (ALA)’. In E. Skier and
M. Kohyama (eds) More Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner Development
SIG, pp. 1–7.
Kuhl, J. (1987) ‘Action control: The maintenance of motivational states’. In F. Halish
and J. Kuhl (eds) Motivation, Intention and Volition. Berlin: Springer, pp. 279–91.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
La Ganza, W. (2008) ‘Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: Interrelating and the
will to power’. In T. E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy:
Concepts, Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 63–79.
Lai, J. (2001) ‘Towards an analytic approach to assessing learner autonomy’, The AILA
Review, 15: 34–44.
Lam, W.S.E. (2004) ‘Second language socialization in bilingual chat room: Global and
local considerations’, Language Learning and Technology, 8 (3): 44–65.
R E F E R E NC E S 263

Lam, W.S.E. (2006) ‘Re-envisioning language, literacy, and the immigrant subject in
new mediascapes’, Pedagogies: an International Journal, 1 (3): 171–95.
Lamb, M. (2004) ‘ “It depends on the students themselves”: Independent language
learning at an Indonesian state school’, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17 (3):
229–45.
Lamb, T.E. (2000) ‘Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an
urban context’. In B. Sinclair et al. (eds) Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future
Directions. London: Longman, pp. 118–27.
Lamb, T.E. (2001) ‘Metacognition and motivation: Learning to learn’. In G. Chambers
(ed.) Reflections on Motivation. London: CILT, pp. 85–93.
Lamb, T.E. (2003) ‘Individualising learning: Organising a flexible learning environ-
ment’. In M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb (eds) Differentiation in the Modern Languages
Classroom. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 177–94.
Lamb, T.E. (2008) ‘Learner autonomy in eight European countries: Opportunities
and tensions in autonomy education reform and language teaching policy’. In
M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb (eds) Pedagogy for Autonomy in Modern Languages
Education: Theory, Practice and Teacher Education. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 36–57.
Lamb, T.E. and Reinders, H. (eds) (2006) Supporting Independent Learning: Issues and
Interventions. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Lamb, T.E. and Reinders, H. (eds) (2008) Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts,
Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lamy, M.-N. and Goodfellow, R. (1999) ‘Supporting language students’ interaction in
web-based conferencing’, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12 (5): 457–77.
Lamy, M.-N. and Hampel, R. (2007) Online Communication in Language Learning and
Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lantolf, J.P. and Pavlenko, A. (2001) ‘(S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory:
Understanding second language learners as people’. In M.P. Breen (ed.) Learner
Contributions to Language Learning. London: Longman, pp. 141–58.
Lantolf, J.P. and Poehner, M.E. (eds) (2008) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of
Second Languages. London: Equinox.
Lantolf, J.P. and Thorne, S.L. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second
Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001) ‘Individual cognitive/affective learner contributions and
differential success in SLA’. In M.P. Breen (ed.) Learner Contributions to Language
Learning: New Directions in Research. London: Longman, pp. 12–24.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lázaro, N. and Reinders, H. (2007) ‘Innovation in self-access: Three case studies’,
CALL-EJ Online, 8 (2).
Legenhausen, L. (2003) ‘Second language acquisition in an autonomous learning
environment’. In D. Little et al. (eds) Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Class-
rooms: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 65–77.
Legutke, M. and Thomas, H. (1991) Process and Experience in the Language Classroom.
London: Longman.
Lewis, J. (1990) ‘Self-assessment in the classroom: A case study’. In G. Brindley (ed.)
The Second Language Curriculum in Action. Sydney: National Centre for English
Language Teaching and Research, pp. 187–213.
264 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Lewis, T. (2003) ‘The case for tandem learning’. In T. Lewis and L. Walker (eds)
Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Sheffield: Academy Electronic Publica-
tions. pp. 13–25.
Lewis, T. (2005) ‘The effective learning of languages in tandem’. In J.A. Coleman and
J. Klapper (eds) Effective Learning and Teaching in Modern Languages. London:
Routledge, pp. 165–72.
Lewis, T. and Walker, L. (eds) (2003) Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem.
Sheffield: Academic and Electronic Press.
Lindley, R. (1986) Autonomy. London: Macmillan.
Little, D. (1990) ‘Autonomy in language learning.’ In I. Gathercole (ed.) Autonomy in
Language Learning, London: CILT, pp. 7–15.
Little, D. (1991) Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, D. (1994) ‘Learner autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical applica-
tion’, Die Neueren Sprachen, 93 (5): 430–42.
Little, D. (1995) ‘Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on
teacher autonomy’, System, 23 (2): 175–82.
Little, D. (1996) ‘Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: Promoting learner
autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies’.
In R. Pemberton et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Hong
Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 203–18.
Little, D. (1997) ‘Language awareness and the autonomous language learner’, Language
Awareness, 6 (2/3): 93–104.
Little, D. (1999) ‘Learner autonomy is more than a Western cultural construct’. In
S. Cotterall and D. Crabbe (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining
the Field and Effecting Change. Bayreuth Contributions to Glottodidactics, vol. 8.
Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 11–18.
Little, D. (2000a) ‘Strategies, counselling and cultural difference: Why we need an anthro-
pological understanding of learner autonomy’. In R. Ribé (ed.) Developing Learner
Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Barcelona: University of Barcelona, pp. 17–33.
Little, D. (2000b) ‘We’re all in it together: Exploring the interdependence of teacher
and learner autonomy’. In L. Karlsson, F. Kjisik and J. Nordlund (eds) All Together
Now. Papers from the 7th Nordic Conference and Workshop on Autonomous
Language Learning, September 2000. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Language
Centre, pp. 45–56.
Little, D. (2003a) ‘Learner autonomy and public examinations’. In D. Little, J. Ridley
and E. Ushioda (eds) Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher,
Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 223–36.
Little, D. (2003b) ‘Tandem language learning and learner autonomy’. In T. Lewis
and L. Walker (eds) Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Sheffield: Academy
Electronic Publications, pp. 37–44.
Little, D. (2005) ‘The Common European Framework and the European Language
Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process’,
Language Testing, 22 (3): 321–36.
Little, D. (2007) ‘Introduction: Re-constructing learner and teacher autonomy in language
education’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language
Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–12.
Little, D., Ridley, J. and Ushioda, E. (2002) Towards Greater Learner Autonomy in the
Foreign Language Classroom. Dublin: Authentik.
R E F E R E NC E S 265

Little, D., Ridley, J. and Ushioda, E. (eds) (2003) Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language
Classrooms: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, D. and Singleton, D. (1990) ‘Cognitive style and learning approach’. In R. Duda
and P. Riley (eds) Learning Styles. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy,
pp. 11–19.
Littlejohn, A. (1982) A procedural guide for teacherless language learning groups. MA
dissertation, University of Lancaster.
Littlejohn, A. (1983) ‘Increasing learner involvement in course management’, TESOL
Quarterly, 17 (4): 595–608.
Littlejohn, A. (1997) ‘Self-access work and curriculum ideologies’. In P. Benson and
P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman,
pp. 181–91.
Littlewood, W.T. (1996) ‘Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework’, System, 24 (4):
427–35.
Littlewood, W.T. (1997) ‘Self-access: Why do we want it and what can it do?’. In
P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning.
London: Longman, pp. 79–92.
Littlewood, W.T. (1999) ‘Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts’,
Applied Linguistics, 20 (1): 71–94.
Livingstone, D.W. (1999) ‘Exploring the icebergs of adult learning: Findings of the
first Canadian Survey of Informal Learning Practices’, Canadian Journal for the Study
of Adult Education, 13 (2): 49–72.
Livingstone, D.W. (2006) ‘Informal learning: Conceptual distinctions and prelimin-
ary findings’. In Z. Bekerman, N.C. Burbules and D. Silberman-Keller (eds)
Learning in Places: The Informal Educational Reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang,
pp. 203–27.
Loewen, S. (2006) ‘Autonomy and language learning behaviour: The role of student
initiation in meaning-focused L2 lessons’. In T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds)
Supporting Independent Learning: Issues and Interventions. Frankfurt am Main: Peter
Lang, pp. 37–54.
Long, M. (1983) ‘Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the
research’, TESOL Quarterly, 17: 359–82.
Louden, W. (1991) Understanding Teaching. London: Cassell.
Lowes, R. and Target, F. (1998) Helping Students to Learn: A Guide to Learner Autonomy.
London: Richmond Publishing.
Luck, M. and d’Inverno, M. (1995) ‘A formal framework for agency and identity’,
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-agent Systems. AAAI Press/
MIT Press, pp. 254–60. <http://www.aaai.org/Library/ICMAS/icmas95contents.php>
Lynch, T. (2001) ‘Promoting EAP learner autonomy in a second language university
context’. In J. Flowerdew and M. Peacock (eds) Research Perspectives on English for
Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 390–403.
Macaro, E. (1997) Target Language, Collaborative Learning and Autonomy. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Macaro, E. (2001) Learning Strategies in Foreign and Second Language Classrooms.
London: Continuum.
Macaro, E. (2008) ‘The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy’. In
T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities
and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–62.
266 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

MacIntyre, P.D. (2007) ‘Willingness to communicate in the second language:


Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process’, Modern Language
Journal, 91 (4): 564–76.
MacIntyre, P. and Gardner, R. (1991) ‘Methods and results in the study of foreign lan-
guage anxiety: A review of the literature’, Language Learning, 41: 25–57.
Mackenzie, A.S. (2002) ‘Changing contexts: Connecting teacher autonomy and
institutional development’. In A.S. Mackenzie and E. McCafferty (eds) Developing
Autonomy. Proceedings of the JALT CUE Conference 2001. Tokyo: The Japan
Association for Language Teaching College and University Educators Special
Interest Group, pp. 223–32.
Mackenzie, A.S. and McCafferty, E. (eds) (2002) Developing Autonomy. Proceedings of
the JALT CUE Conference 2001. Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language
Teaching College and University Educators Special Interest Group.
Mackenzie, C. (2000) ‘Imagining oneself otherwise’. In C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar
(eds) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–50.
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (2000) ‘Introduction: Autonomy refigured’. In C. Mackenzie
and N. Stoljar (eds) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and
the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–31.
Malcolm, D. (2005) ‘An Arabic-speaking English learner’s path to autonomy through
reading’. In P. Benson and D. Nunan (eds) Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity
in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–82.
Markus, H. and Nurius, P. (1986) ‘Possible selves’, American Psychologist, 41 (9): 954–69.
Matsumoto, K. (1989) ‘An analysis of a Japanese ESL learner’s diary: Factors involved
in the L2 learning process’, JALT Journal, 11: 167–92.
Matsumoto, K. (1996) ‘Helping L2 learners reflect on classroom learning’, ELT
Journal, 50 (2): 143–9.
McDonough, S. (1999) ‘Learner strategies’, Language Teaching, 32: 1–18.
McDonough, S. (2005) ‘Training language learning expertise’. In K. Johnson (ed.)
Expertise in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 150–64.
McGrath, I. (2000) ‘Teacher autonomy’. In B. Sinclair et al. (eds) Learner Autonomy,
Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. London: Longman, pp. 100–10.
McNamara, M.J. and Deane, D. (1995) ‘Self-assessment activities: Toward autonomy
in language learning’, TESOL Journal, 5 (3): 17–21.
Meyers, D.T. (1989) Self, Society and Personal Choice. New York, NY: Columbia
University Press.
Mezirow, J. (1981) ‘A critical theory of adult learning and education’, Adult Education,
32 (1): 3–24.
Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (ed.) and Associates (1990) Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide
to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miliander, J. and Trebbi, T. (eds) (2008) Educational Policies and Language Learner
Autonomy in Schools: A New Direction in Language Education. Dublin: Authentik.
Miller, L. (ed.) (2007) Learner Autonomy 9: Autonomy in the Classroom. Dublin:
Authentik.
Moore, M.G. (1972) ‘Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learn-
ing’, Convergence, 5 (2): 76–88.
R E F E R E NC E S 267

Moreira, M.A. (2007) ‘On democracy and learner autonomy in initial teacher educa-
tion: Guerrilla warfare?’ In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy
in Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
pp. 56–70.
Morrison, B. (2005) ‘Evaluating learning gain in a self-access language learning centre’,
Language Teaching Research, 9 (3): 267–93.
Motteram, G. (1997) ‘Learner autonomy and the web’. In V. Darleguy et al. (eds)
Educational Technology in Language Learning: Theoretical Considerations and Practical
Applications. Lyons: INSA (National Institute of Applied Sciences), pp. 17–24.
Mozzon-McPherson, M. (2007) ‘Supporting independent learning environments:
An analysis of structures and roles of language learning advisers’, System, 35 (1):
66–92.
Mozzon-McPherson, M. and Vismans, R. (eds) (2001) Beyond Language Teaching:
Towards Language Advising. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching
and Research.
Mullen, T., Apple, C. and Shanklin, T. (2009) ‘Skype-based tandem language learning
and Web 2.0’. In M. Thomas (ed.) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second
Language Learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 101–18.
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000) ‘Tandem learning’. In M. Byram (ed.) Routledge
Encyclopaedia of Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, pp. 595–7.
Mundy, K. (2005) ‘Globalization and educational change: New policy worlds’. In
N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood and D. Livingstone (eds)
International Handbook of Educational Policy. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–17.
Murayama, I. (1996) ‘The status of strategies in learning: A brief history of changes
in researchers’ views’, Learning Learning: JALT Learner Development N-SIG Forum,
2 (3): 7–12.
Murphy, L. (2008a) ‘Integrating strategy instruction into learning materials’. In
S. Hurd and T. Lewis (eds) Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings.
Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 303–20.
Murphy, L. (2008b) ‘Supporting learner autonomy: Developing practice through the
production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish’,
Language Teaching Research, 12 (1): 83–102.
Murray, G. (2008a) ‘Communities of practice: Stories of Japanese EFL learners’. In
P. Kalaja, V. Menezes and A.M. Barcelos (eds) Narratives of Learning and Teaching
EFL. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 128–40.
Murray, G. (2008b) ‘Pop culture and language learning: Learners’ stories informing
EFL’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2 (1): 2–17.
Murray, G. and Kojima, M. (2007) ‘Out-of-class learning: One learner’s story’. In
P. Benson (ed.) Learner Autonomy 8: Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Dublin: Authentik,
pp. 25–40.
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H.H. and Todesco, A. (1978) The Good Language
Learner. Research in Education Series, No. 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies
in Education.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Natri, T.H. (2007) ‘Active learnership in continuous self- and peer-evaluation’. In
A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry
and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 108–19.
268 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Noels, K.A., Clément, R. and Pelletier, L.G. (1999) ‘Perceptions of teacher communic-
ative style and student’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivation’, Modern Language Journal,
83 (1): 23–34.
Noels, K.A., Pelletier, L.G., Clément, R. and Vallerand, R.J. (2000) ‘Why are you
learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination
theory’, Language Learning, 50 (1): 57–85.
Norton, B. (1997) ‘Language, identity and the ownership of English’, TESOL
Quarterly, 31 (3): 409–29.
Norton, B. (2000) Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational
Change. London: Longman.
Norton, B. and Toohey, K. (eds) (2004) Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (1989) Understanding Language Classrooms. London: Prentice Hall.
Nunan, D. (1991) Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prentice Hall.
Nunan, D. (1995) ‘Closing the gap between learning and instruction’, TESOL
Quarterly, 29 (1): 133–58.
Nunan, D. (1997) ‘Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy’.
In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning.
London: Longman, pp. 192–203.
Nunan, D. (2003) ‘The impact of English as a global language on educational policies
and practices in the Asia-Pacific region’, TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4): 589–613.
O’Malley, J.M. and Chamot, A.U. (1990) Learning Strategies in Second Language
Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Rourke, B. and Schwienhorst, K. (2003) ‘Talking text: Reflections on reflection in
computer-mediated communication’. In D. Little, J. Ridley and E. Ushioda (eds)
Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and
Assessment. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 47–62.
Olssen, M. (2005) ‘Foucault, educational research and the issue of autonomy’,
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37 (3): 365–87.
Oscarson, M. (1989) ‘Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applica-
tions’, Language Testing, 6: 1–13.
Oscarson, M. (1997) ‘Self-assessment of foreign and second language proficiency’.
In C. Clapham and D. Corson (eds) Language Testing and Assessment. Encyclopedia
of Language and Education. Volume 7. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 175–87.
Otto, E. (2003) ‘Language learning strategies in tandem: How to learn efficiently’.
In T. Lewis and L. Walker (eds) Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Sheffield:
Academy Electronic Publications, pp. 79–91.
Oxford, R.L. (1990) Language Learning Strategies: What every Teacher should Know.
Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.
Oxford, R.L. (2003) ‘Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy’. In
D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language
Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–91.
Palfreyman, D. (2003a) ‘Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy’. In D. Palfreyman
and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language Education
Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–19.
Palfreyman, D. (2003b) ‘The representation of learner autonomy and learner indepen-
dence in organizational culture’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner
Autonomy arcoss Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan, pp. 183–200.
R E F E R E NC E S 269

Palfreyman, D. and Smith, R.C. (eds) (2003) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language
Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paredes, R.G.A., Ogata, H., Nobuji, A., Oishi, Y., Ueda, T. (2005) ‘LOCH: Support-
ing informal language learning outside the classroom with handhelds’. Proceedings of
the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.
Tokushima, Japan / Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 182–186.
Paris, S.G. and Byrnes, J.Y.P. (1989) ‘The constructivist approach to self-regulation of
learning in the classroom’. In B.J. Zimmerman and D.H. Schunk (eds) Self-regulated
Learning and Academic Achievement. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 169–200.
Pearson, N. (2004) ‘The idiosyncracies of out-of-class language learning: A study of
mainland Chinese students studying English at tertiary level in New Zealand’. In
H. Reinders, H. Anderson, M. Hobbs and J. Jones-Parry (eds) Supporting Independent
Learning in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the
Independent Learning Association, Melbourne, 13–14 September, 2003. Auckland:
Independent Learning Association Oceania, pp. 121–33.
Pemberton, L., Fallahkhair, S. and Mastoff, E. (2005) ‘Learner centred development
of a mobile and iTV language learning support system’, Educational Technology and
Society, 8 (4): 52–63.
Pemberton, R., Toogood, S., Ho, S. and Lam, J. (2001) ‘Approaches to advising for
self-directed language learning’, The AILA Review, 15: 16–25.
Pennycook, A. (1997) ‘Cultural alternatives and autonomy’. In P. Benson and P. Voller
(eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman,
pp. 35–53.
Perkins, D.N. and Salomon, G. (1989) ‘Are cognitive skills context-bound?’,
Educational Researcher, 18 (1): 16–25.
Pickard, N. (1995) ‘Out-of class language learning strategies: Three case studies’,
Language Learning Journal, 12: 35–7.
Pierce, B.N. (1995) ‘Social identity, investment and language learning’, TESOL
Quarterly, 29 (1): 9–31.
Pierson, H.D. (1996) ‘Learner culture and learner autonomy in the Hong Kong
Chinese context.’ In R. Pemberton et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language
Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 49–58.
Pinter, A. (2007) ‘Towards teacher autonomy’. In P. Benson (ed.) Learner Autonomy 8:
Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 104–20.
Porto, M. (2007) ‘Learning diaries in the English as a foreign language classroom: A
tool for accessing learners’ perceptions of lessons and developing learner autonomy
and reflection’, Foreign Language Annals, 40 (4): 672–96.
Prabhu, N.S. (1987) Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramadevi, S. (1992) Learner Autonomy in the ESL Classroom: A Study in Curriculum
Design. New Dehli: B.R. Publishing Corporation.
Ravindram, R. (2000) ‘Towards learner autonomy: Evolution in practice: The
Certificate in Independent Language Learning’. In B. Sinclair et al. (eds) Learner
Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. London: Longman, pp. 60–72.
Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rees-Miller, J. (1993) ‘A critical appraisal of learner training: Theoretical bases and
teaching implications’, TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4): 679–89.
Rees-Miller, J. (1994) ‘Comments on Janie Rees-Miller’s “A critical appraisal of learner
training: Theoretical bases and teaching implications”: The author responds’,
TESOL Quarterly, 28 (4): 776–81.
270 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Reinders, H. (2007) ‘Big brother is helping you: Supporting self-access language learn-
ing with a student monitoring system’, System, 35 (1): 93–111.
Reinders, H., Hacker, P. and Lewis, M. (2004) ‘The language advisor’s role:
Identifying and responding to needs’, Language Learning Journal, 30: 30–5.
Reinders, H. and Lázaro, N. (2007) ‘Innovation in language support: The provision of
technology in self-access’, CALL Journal, 20 (2): 117–30.
Ribé, R. (ed.) (2000) Developing Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning.
Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
Ribé, R. (2003) ‘Tramas in the foreign language classroom: Autopoietic networks for
learner growth’. In D. Little, J. Ridley and E. Ushioda (eds) Learner Autonomy in
Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin:
Authentik, pp. 11–28.
Ribé, R. and Vidal, N. (1993) Project Work. London: Heinemann.
Riley, P. (ed.) (1985) Discourse and Learning. London: Longman.
Riley, P. (1986) ‘Who’s who in self-access.’ TESOL France News, 6 (2): 23–35.
Riley, P. (1988) ‘The ethnography of autonomy’. In A. Brookes and P. Grundy (eds)
Individualisation and Autonomy in Language Learning. ELT Documents 131. London:
Modern English Publications in association with the British Council (Macmillan),
pp. 12–34.
Riley, P. (1996) ‘The blind man and the bubble: Researching self-access.’ In R. Pemberton
et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong
University Press, pp. 251–64.
Riley, P. (1997) ‘The guru and the conjurer: Aspects of counselling for self-access’. In
P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning.
London: Longman, pp. 114–31.
Riley, P. (2003) ‘Self-access as access to “self ”: Cultural variation in the notions of self
and personhood’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across
Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 92–109.
Riley, P. and Zoppis, C. (1985) ‘The sound and video library’. In P. Riley (ed.) Discourse
and Learning. London: Longman, pp. 286–98.
Rivers, W.P. (1998) ‘Is being there enough? The effects of homestay placements on
language gain during study abroad’, Foreign Language Annals, 31 (4), 492–500.
Rivers, W.P. (2001) ‘Autonomy at all costs: An ethnography of metacognitive self-
assessment and self-management among experienced language learners’, The Modern
Language Journal, 85 (2): 279–90.
Roberts, J.T. (1995) ‘An anatomy of home-study foreign language courses’, System,
23 (4): 513–40.
Robinson, P. (2003) ‘Attention and memory during SLA’. In C. Doughty and M. Long
(eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 631–79.
Roebuck, R. (2000) ‘Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psy-
cholinguistic task’. In J.P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language
Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–96.
Rogers, C.R. (1969) Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Rogers, C.R. (1983) Freedom to Learn for the 80s. New York, NY: Merrill.
Rohrkemper, M.M. (1989) ‘Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A
Vygotskian view’. In B.J. Zimmerman and D.H. Schunk (eds) Self-regulated Learning
and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Springer,
pp. 143–67.
R E F E R E NC E S 271

Rowsell, L.V. and Libben, G. (1994) ‘The sound of one-hand clapping: How
to succeed in independent language learning’, Canadian Modern Language Review,
50 (4): 668–88.
Rubin, J. (1975) ‘What the “good language learner” can teach us’, TESOL Quarterly, 9:
41–51.
Rubin, J. (ed.) (2007) Language Counselling. Special issue of System, 35 (1): 1–9.
Rubin, J. and Thompson, I. (1982) How to be a More Successful Language Learner.
Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. 2nd edn, 1994.
Sakui, K. (2002) ‘Motivation and autonomy: Japanese teachers’ perspectives’. In
A.S. Mackenzie and E. McCafferty (eds) Developing Autonomy. Proceedings of the
JALT CUE Conference 2001. Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language
Teaching College and University Educators Special Interest Group, pp. 73–8.
Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008) Tasks in Second Language Learning. New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Sanders, R.F. (2005) ‘Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online
management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning’, Foreign Language
Annals, 38 (4): 523–32.
Sataporn, S. and Lamb, M. (2005) ‘Accommodation zone: Two learners’ struggles to
cope with a distance learning English course’. In P. Benson and D. Nunan (eds)
Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity in Language Learning. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–33.
Schalkwijk, E., van Esch, K., Elsen, A. and Setz, W. (2002) ‘Learner autonomy and the
education of language teachers: How to practice what is preached and preach what
is practiced’. In S.J. Savignon (ed.) Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching:
Contexts and Concerns in Teacher Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
pp. 165–90.
Scharle, Á. and Szabó, A. (2000) Learner Autonomy: A Guide to Developing Learner
Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmenk, B. (2005) ‘Globalizing learner autonomy’, TESOL Quarterly, 39(1): 107–18.
Schmidt, R.W. (1990) ‘The role of consciousness in second language learning’, Applied
Linguistics, 11: 11–26.
Schmidt, R.W. and Frota, S.N. (1986) ‘Developing basic conversational ability in a sec-
ond language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese’. In R. Day (ed.) Talking
to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House,
pp. 237–326.
Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (eds) (1994) Self-regulation of Learning and
Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (eds) (1998) Self-regulated Learning: From Teaching
to Self-regulated Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Schwienhorst, K. (ed.) (2006) Learner Autonomy and Virtual Environments in CALL.
London: Routledge.
Scovel, T. (2001) Learning New Languages: A Guide to Second Language Instruction.
Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Sercu, L. (2002) ‘Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural commu-
nicative competence: Some implications for course development’, Language, Culture
and Curriculum, 15(1): 61–74.
Shao, H. and Wu, Z. (2007) ‘Nurturing language learner autonomy through caring
pedagogic practice’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in
272 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,


pp. 95–107.
Shaw, J. (2008) ‘Team-teaching as negotiating autonomy and shared understandings
of what we are doing’. In T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher
Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187–204.
Shedivy, S.L. (2004) ‘Factors that lead some students to continue the study of foreign
language past the usual 2 years in high school’, System, 32 (1): 103–19.
Sheerin, S. (1991) ‘State of the art: self-access’, Language Teaching, 24 (3): 143–57.
Sheerin, S. (1997) ‘An exploration of the relationship between self-access and indepen-
dent learning’. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in
Language Learning. London: Longman, pp. 54–65.
Shimo, E. (2003) ‘Learners’ perceptions of portfolio assessment and autonomous
learning’. In A. Barfield and M. Nix (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy in Japan 1:
Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: Learner Development Special Interest Group of the
Japan Association of Language Teachers, pp. 175–88.
Shohamy, E. (1997) ‘Critical language testing and beyond’. Paper presented at the
American Association of Applied Linguistics Meeting, Orlando, March.
Simmons, D. and Wheeler, S. (1995) The Process Syllabus in Action. Sydney: National
Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Sinclair, B. (1999) ‘Wrestling with a jelly: The evaluation of learner autonomy’. In
B. Morrison (ed.) Experiments and Evaluation in Self-Access Language Learning.
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Association for Self-Access Learning and Development,
pp. 95–109.
Sinclair, B., McGrath, I. and Lamb, T. (eds) (2000) Learner Autonomy, Teacher
Autonomy: Future Directions. London: Longman.
Skier, E. and Kohyama, M. (eds) (2006) More Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: JALT Learner
Development SIG.
Slimani, Y. (1992) ‘Evaluating classroom interaction’. In J.C. Alderson and A. Beretta
(eds) Evaluating Second Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
pp. 197–221.
Smith, M.K. (2006) ‘Beyond the curriculum: Fostering associational life in schools’.
In Z. Bekerman, N.C. Burbules and D. Silberman-Keller (eds) Learning in Places: The
Informal Educational Reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 9–33.
Smith, R.C. (2001) ‘Group work for autonomy in Asia’, The AILA Review, 15: 70–81.
Smith, R.C. (2003) ‘Pedagogy for autonomy as (becoming-) appropriate methodology’.
In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language
Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 129–46.
Smith, R.C. and Erdoğan, S. (2008) ‘Teacher-learner autonomy: Programme goals
and student-teacher constructs’. In T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and
Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
pp. 83–102.
Smith, R.C. and Vieira, F. (eds) (2009) Teacher Education for Learner Autonomy: Building
a Knowledge Base. Special issue of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3 (3).
Smyth, J. (1991) Teachers as Collaborative Learners. Milton Keynes: Open University
Press.
So, S. and Domínguez, R. (2005) ‘Emotion processes in second language acquisition’.
In P. Benson and D. Nunan (eds) Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity in
Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–55.
R E F E R E NC E S 273

Sonaiya, R. (2002) ‘Autonomous language learning in Africa: A mismatch of cultural


assumptions’, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15 (2): 106–16.
Spear, G.E. and Mocker, D.W. (1984) ‘The organizing circumstance: Environmental
determinants in self-directed learning’, Adult Education Quarterly, 35: 1–10.
Spratt, M., Humphreys, G. and Chan, V. (2002) ‘Autonomy and motivation: Which
comes first?’ Language Teaching Research, 6 (3): 245–56.
Stephenson, J. and Kohyama, M. (2003) ‘Tuning freshmen onto autonomy through
student-directed language learning projects’. In A. Barfield and M. Nix (eds) Learner
and Teacher Autonomy in Japan 1: Autonomy You Ask! Tokyo: Learner Development
Special Interest Group of the Japan Association of Language Teachers, pp. 101–12.
Stern, H. (1975) ‘What can we learn from the good language learner?’, Canadian
Modern Language Review, 31: 304–18.
Stevens, V. (1995) ‘Concordancing with language learners: Why? when? what?’,
CAELL Journal, 6 (2): 2–10.
Stevick, E.W. (1990) Humanism in Language Teaching: A Critical Perspective. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Strage, A. (1998) ‘Family context variables and the development of self-regulation in
college students’, Adolescence, 55: 17–31.
Straub, J., Zielke, B. and Werbik, H. (2005) ‘Autonomy, narrative identity, and their
critics’. In W. Greve, K. Rothermund and D. Wentura (eds) The Adaptive Self:
Personal Continuity and Intentional Self-Development. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefer and
Huber, pp. 323–50
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sturtridge, G. (1997) ‘Teaching and language learning in self-access centres: Changing
roles?’ In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language
Learning. London: Longman, pp. 66–78.
Sullivan, K. and Lindgren, E. (2002) ‘Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided
second language writing’, ELT Journal, 56 (3): 258–66.
Swain, M., Brooks, L. and Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002) ‘Peer-peer dialogue as a means of
second language learning’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 171–85.
Thavenius, C. (1999) ‘Teacher autonomy for learner autonomy’. In D. Crabbe and
S. Cotterall (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and
Effecting Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 159–63.
Thomas, L.F. and Harri-Augstein, S. (1990) ‘On constructing a learning conversation’.
In R. Duda and P. Riley (eds) Learning Styles. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de
Nancy, pp. 207–21.
Thomson, C.K. (1996) ‘Self-assessment in self-directed learning: Issues of learner
diversity.’ In R. Pemberton et al. (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language
Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 77–91.
Thornbury, S. (2005) How to Teach Speaking. London: Longman.
Thornton, P. and Sharples, M. (2005) ‘Patterns of technology use in self-directed
Japanese language learning projects and implications for new mobile support
tools’, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile
Technologies in Education. Tokushima, Japan / Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society,
pp. 203–5.
Tomlin, R.S. and Villa, V. (1994) ‘Attention in cognitive science and second language
acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16: 183–203.
274 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Toogood, S. and Pemberton, R. (2007) ‘Support structures for self-access learning’. In


A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry
and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 180–95.
Toohey, K. (2007) ‘Autonomy/agency through socio-cultural lenses’. In A. Barfield and
S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 231–42.
Tough, A. (1971) The Adult’s Learning Projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies
in Education.
Tough, A. (1978) ‘Major learning efforts: Recent research and future directions’, Adult
Education Quarterly, 28 (4): 250–63.
Trebbi, T. (2008a) ‘Is freedom a prerequisite for autonomy? Classroom innovation
and language teacher education’. In T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and
Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
pp. 33–46.
Trebbi, T. (2008b) ‘Language learner autonomy in a Norwegian context’. In
J. Miliander and T. Trebbi (eds) Educational Policies and Language Learner Autonomy
in Schools: A New Direction in Language Education. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 40–52.
Tseng, W.T., Dörnyei, Z. and Schmitt, N. (2006) ‘A new approach to assessing
strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition’, Applied
Linguistics, 27 (1): 78–102.
Umino, T. (1999) ‘The use of self-instructional broadcast materials for L2 learning:
An investigation in the Japanese context’, System, 27 (3): 309–27.
Umino, T. (2005) ‘Learning a second language with broadcast materials at home:
Japanese students’ long-term experiences’. In P. Benson and D. Nunan (eds)
Learners’ Stories: Difference and Diversity in Language Learning. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–49.
Underwood, J. (1984) Linguistics, Computers and the Language Teacher: A Communicative
Approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ushioda, E. (1996) Learner Autonomy 5: The Role of Motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
Ushioda, E. (2003) ‘Motivation as a socially mediated process’. In D. Little, J. Ridley
and E. Ushioda (eds) Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher,
Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 90–102.
Ushioda, E. (2007) ‘Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory’. In P. Benson (ed.)
Learner Autonomy 8: Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 5–24.
Ushioda, E. and Dörnyei, Z. (2009) ‘Motivation, language identities and the L2 self:
A theoretical overview’. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds) Motivation, Language
Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–8.
Vallerand, R.J. (1997) ‘Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motiva-
tion’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29: 271–360.
van Esch, K. and St. John, O. (eds) (2003) A Framework for Freedom: Learner Autonomy
in Foreign Language Teacher Education. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
van Lier, L. (2007) ‘Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity’, Innovation in
Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (1): 46–65.
van Lier, L. (2008) ‘Agency in the classroom’. In J.P. Lantolf and M.E. Poehner
(eds) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. London: Equinox,
pp. 163–86.
Vanijdee, A. (2003) ‘Thai distance English learners and learner autonomy’, Open
Learning, 18 (1): 75–84.
R E F E R E NC E S 275

Victori, M. (ed.) (2000) Autonomy in Second Language Learning. Special issue of Links
and Letters, 7. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Victori, M. (2007) ‘The development of learners’ support mechanisms in a self-access
center and their implementation in a credit-based self-directed learning program’,
System, 35 (1): 10–31.
Vieira, F. (1997) ‘Pedagogy for autonomy: Exploratory answers to questions any teacher
should ask’. In M. Müller-Verweyen (ed.) Standpunkte zur Sprach- und Kulturvermittlung
7. Neues Lernen, Selbstgesteuert, Autonom. München: Goethe-Institut, pp. 53–72.
Vieira, F. (1999) ‘Pedagogy for autonomy: Teacher development and pedagogical
experimentation – an in-service teacher training project’. In D. Crabbe and
S. Cotterall (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and
Effecting Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 149–58.
Vieira, F. (2003) ‘Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from
working with teachers’. In D. Palfreyman and R.C. Smith (eds) Learner Autonomy
across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
pp. 220–39.
Vieira, F. (2007) ‘Teacher development through inquiry: Getting started’. In A. Barfield
and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry and
Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–29.
Vieira, F. (ed.) (2009) Struggling for Autonomy in Language Education: Reflecting, Acting,
and Being. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Vieira, F., Moreira, M.A., Barbosa, I. and Paiva, M. (eds) (2002) Pedagogy for Autonomy
and English Learning: Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Working Group – Pedagogy
for Autonomy. Braga: University of Minho.
Vieira, F., Paiva, M., Marques, I. and Fernandes, I.S. (2008) ‘Teaching education
towards teacher and learner autonomy: What can be learnt from teacher develop-
ment practices?’ In T.E. Lamb and H. Reinders (eds) Learner and Teacher Autonomy:
Concepts, Realities and Responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 217–36.
Voller, P. (1997) ‘Does the teacher have a role in autonomous learning?’ In P. Benson
and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London:
Longman, pp. 98–113.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waite, S. (1994) ‘Low-resourced self-access with EAP in the developing world: The
great enabler?’, ELT Journal, 48 (3): 233–42.
Walker, E. (1997) Foreign language anxiety in Hong Kong secondary schools: Its rela-
tionship with the age-related factors, schools form and self-perception. PhD Thesis,
University of Hong Kong.
Wall, S. (2003) ‘Freedom as a political ideal’. In E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller and J. Paul (eds)
Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–34.
Wallace, M.J. (1998) Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wang, M.C. and Peverly, S.T. (1986) ‘The self-instructive process in classroom learn-
ing contexts’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11: 370–404.
Wang, Y. (2004) ‘Distance language learning: Interactivity and fourth-generation
internet-based videoconferencing’, CALICO Journal, 21 (2): 373–95.
Warschauer, M. and Healey, D. (1998) ‘Computers and language learning: An
overview’, Language Teaching, 31: 57–71.
276 TE AC HI NG AND RESEARC H I N G AUT O N O MY

Warschauer, M., Turbee, L. and Roberts, B. (1996) ‘Computer learning networks and
student empowerment’, System, 24 (1): 1–14.
Weaver, S.J. and Cohen, A.D. (1997) Strategies-based Instruction: A Teacher-training
Video. CARLA Working Paper Series 8. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research
on Language Acquisition.
Weil, S. (1952) The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Weiner, B. (1984) ‘Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application
within an attributional framework’. In R. Ames and C. Ames (eds) Research on
Motivation in Education. Volume 1. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 15–38.
Wenden, A. (1983) ‘Literature review: The process of intervention’, Language
Learning, 33: 103–21.
Wenden, A. (1986a) ‘Helping learners think about learning’, ELT Journal, 40 (1): 3–12.
Wenden, A. (1986b) ‘What do second language learners know about their second
language learning? A second look at retrospective learner accounts’, Applied
Linguistics, 7 (2): 186–201.
Wenden, A. (1987) ‘How to be a successful language learner: Insights and prescriptions
from L2 learners’. In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds) Learner Strategies in Language
Learning. London: Prentice Hall, pp. 103–14.
Wenden, A. (1991) Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. London: Prentice Hall
International.
Wenden, A. (1995) ‘Learner training in context: A knowledge-based approach’, System,
23 (2): 183–94.
Wenden, A. (1998) ‘Metacognitive knowledge and language learning’, Applied
Linguistics, 19 (4): 515–37.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
White, C. (1995) ‘Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning:
Research findings’, System, 23 (2): 207–22.
White, C. (2003) Language Learning in Distance Education. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wickens, C.D. (2007) ‘Attention to the second language’, IRAL, 45 (3): 177–91.
Williams, M. and Burden, R. (1997) Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wiseman, A.W. and Baker, D.P. (2005) ‘The worldwide explosion of internationalized
education policy’. In D.P. Baker and A.W. Wiseman (eds) Global Trends in
Educational Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–21.
Wright, T. (1987) Roles of Teachers and Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wrigley, J. (1982) ‘The division between mental and manual labor: Artisan education
in science in nineteenth-century Britain’, The American Journal of Sociology, 88 (s):
S31–S51.
Wu, Z. (2004) ‘Being, understanding and naming: Teachers’ life and work in harmony’,
International Journal of Educational Research, 41 (4/5): 307–23.
Wu, Z. (2006) ‘Understanding practitioner research as a form of life: An Eastern inter-
pretation of Exploratory Practice’, Language Teaching Research, 10 (3): 331–50.
Ying, D. (2007) ‘Teacher educators’ collaborative inquiry in a context of educational
innovation in China: A case study of RICH as a learning community’. In
R E F E R E NC E S 277

T. Townsend and R. Bates (eds) Handbook of Teacher Education: Globalization,


Standards and Professionalism in Times of Change. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 539–54.
Young, J.T., Hafner, C.A. and Fisher, D.W. (2007) ‘Shifting sands: Supporting teachers
in facilitating independent learning’. In A. Barfield and S. Brown (eds) Reconstructing
Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan, pp. 196–208.
Young, R. (1986) Personal Autonomy: Beyond Negative and Positive Liberty. London:
Croom Helm.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1998) ‘Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An
analysis of exemplary instructional models’. In D.H. Schunk and B.J. Zimmerman
(eds) Self-regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-regulated Practice. New York, NY:
Guilford Press, pp. 1–19.
Zimmerman, B.J. and Schunk, D.H. (eds) (1989) Self-regulated Learning and Academic
Achievement: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.

You might also like