Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of Supplemental Irrigation Based On Soil Water Content On Water Consumption, Dry Matter and Yield of Wheat
Effects of Supplemental Irrigation Based On Soil Water Content On Water Consumption, Dry Matter and Yield of Wheat
Effects of Supplemental Irrigation Based On Soil Water Content On Water Consumption, Dry Matter and Yield of Wheat
ABSTRACT
Water-saving cultivation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important technique for achieving high yield and high
water use eficiency (WUE) in the North China Plain (NCP) where water resources are in shortage. In order to determine
the effects of supplemental irrigation based on soil water content on crop evapotranspiration (ET), DM, grain yield
and WUE in wheat, treatments were designed to vary the relative soil water content at jointing and anthesis stages: I70
(70%, 70%) and I75 (75%, 75%) with rain-fed (I0) and traditional irrigation (Ick) as contrasts. The results indicated that
the irrigation amount of I70 and I75 were significantly lower than that of Ick by 45.1 to 132.4 mm, but soil water depletion
increased by 23.5 to 35.4 mm. Although the total ET throughout the growing season (ETt) of I75 was less than that of Ick,
the ratio to ETt from anthesis to maturity increased significantly. The DM partitioning ratio was decreased in vegetable
organs, but increased in grain for I75 compared with Ick. The grain yield for I75 was significantly higher than that of I0 and
I70, whereas nonsignificant difference was observed between I75 and Ick, and the WUE and irrigation water use efficiency
of I75 were higher than those of Ick by 11.0% and 87.4% in 2008-2009 and 3.5% and 34.0% in 2009-2010. Thus, I75 can be
developed as an optimal water-saving irrigation regimes in the NCP.
Key words: Dry matter accumulation and partitioning, grain yield, Triticum aestivum, water consumption characterization,
water use efficiency.
INTRODUCTION
Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the main crop in the North China Plain (NCP) and supplies more than 60%
of wheat throughout China (Shi et al., 2013). During the winter wheat growing season, crop evapotranspiration (ET)
is approximately 400 to 500 mm, but the mean precipitation does not exceed 200 mm (Li et al., 2012a). Therefore,
water is the main limiting factor for winter wheat production, and irrigation is essential to maintaining high winter
wheat yields (Wang et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2018) in this region. In most parts of the NCP, more than 70% of irrigation
water resources are used for winter wheat, and most of these water resources come from groundwater. Although flood
irrigation is traditionally performed for three to five times or six to seven times during the winter wheat growing season
in the NCP, water use efficiency (WUE) is low (Zhang et al., 2017). The extensive exploitation of the groundwater
resources in this region for irrigation, causes numerous other environmental problems (Hayriye et al., 2015). Thus,
optimum irrigation strategies are urgently needed to prevent further groundwater exploitation, to produce wheat
sustainably, and to improve WUE.
Many optimized irrigation scheduling strategies have been thoroughly studied and widely applied to improve wheat
yield and increase WUE (Abdelkhalek et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2018). Li et al. (2009) reported that irrigation at jointing
Table 2. Soil bulk density, mass soil water content and field water capacity of the tested soil.
2008-2009 growing season 2009-2010 growing season
Soil Soil bulk Mass soil Field water Soil bulk Mass soil Field water
layer density water content capacity density water content capacity
cm g cm-3 g g-1 g cm-3 g g-1
0-20 1.45 0.191 0.277 1.46 0.16 0.285
20-40 1.52 0.173 0.253 1.51 0.18 0.253
40-60 1.53 0.189 0.250 1.52 0.19 0.248
60-80 1.55 0.193 0.254 1.55 0.20 0.249
80-100 1.57 0.206 0.248 1.57 0.20 0.244
100-120 1.56 0.232 0.249 1.56 0.23 0.248
120-140 1.57 0.246 0.242 1.57 0.28 0.245
Table 3. Target relative soil water contents (RSWC) or irrigation amount at jointing and anthesis stages.
Average target RSWC in 0-140 cm soil layer or
irrigation amount
Treatments Jointing stage Anthesis stage
I70 70% 70%
I75 75% 75%
I0 0 mm 0 mm
Ick 60 mm 60 mm
70% (I70) and 75% (I75) were the average RSWC of the 0-140 cm soil layer after
supplemental irrigation.
A rain-fed treatment (I0) and a conventional irrigation treatment (Ick), which were supplied with 60 mm water at the
prewinter, jointing, and anthesis stages, were established as controls.
Before irrigation at the jointing and anthesis stages, SWC of 0-140 cm soil layer was tested with three times replication
of each sample. The average SWC of I0, I70, I75 and Ick in 0-140 cm soil layer were 0.157, 0.157, 0.159 and 0.172 g g-1 at
jointing stage, and were 0.153, 0.176, 0.175 and 0.174 g g-1 at anthesis stage in 2008-2009. In 2009-2010, the values were
0.167, 0.168, 0.168 and 0.182 g g-1 at jointing stage, and 0.143, 0.143, 0.149 and 0.161 g g-1 at anthesis stage. The amount
of supplemental irrigation was calculated using Equation [1] (Man et al., 2016):
I = 10 v h (βi - βj), [1]
where I is the amount of supplemental irrigation (mm), v is soil bulk density of the designed moisture soil layer (g cm-3),
h is the soil layer depth (cm), βi is the designed target mass water content (field water capacity × target average RSWC),
and βj is soil mass water content before irrigation.
A supplemental irrigation event occurred the next day after the relative SWC of 0-140 cm soil layer was tested at the
jointing and anthesis. Supplemental irrigation water was supplied from a pump outlet to the plots using soft plastic pipes,
and the amount of irrigation was measured using flow meters fitted to the plastic pipes for each plot.
On the third day after SI, soil samples of 0-200 cm layer were collected to calculate the RSWC, and each sample was
replicated three times.
Each experiment plot was 2 × 10 m and was designed in a randomized block with three replicates. A 1 m-wide buffer
zone around each plot was sown with same wheat cultivar. The winter wheat seeds were sown at a rate of 180 grains m-2
on 8 October both years, and were harvested on 8 June in 2009 and on 14 June in 2010. Before sowing, urea (46.4% N),
diammonium phosphate (46% P2O5 and 18% N), and potassium sulfate (52% K2O) were applied to provide 105 kg N ha-1,
112.5 kg P2O5 ha-1, and 112.5 kg K2O ha-1 as the basal fertilizer, and the urea was added to provide 135 kg N ha-1 at the
jointing stage.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Multiple comparisons were conducted
with least significant difference (LSD) for a probability level of P = 0.05. Correlation analysis was performed using linear
or quadratic function models of the SigmaPlot 12.5 (Systat Software, San Jose, California, USA).
Table 4. Irrigation, soil water depletion, precipitation and their percentage to total evapotranspiration (ETt).
Irrigation Soil water depletion Precipitation
Treatments ETt Amount PI Amount PS Amount PP
mm mm % mm % mm %
2008-2009
I0 360.3d 0.0d 0.0d 217.5a 60.4a 142.8 39.6a
I70 399.9c 47.6c 11.9c 209.5b 52.4b 142.8 35.7b
I75 449.0b 99.8b 22.2b 206.4b 46.0c 142.8 31.8c
Ick 496.9a 180.0a 36.2a 174.1c 35.0d 142.8 28.7d
ANOVA ** ** ** * ** **
2009-2010
I0 441.3c 0.0d 0.0d 292.2a 66.2a 149.1 33.8a
I70 484.4b 94.8c 19.6c 240.5b 49.6b 149.1 30.8b
I75 528.2a 134.9b 25.5b 244.2b 46.2c 149.1 28.2c
Ick 546.1a 180.0a 33.0a 217.0c 39.7d 149.1 27.3c
ANOVA ** ** ** * ** *
ETt: Total evapotranspiration throughout the growing season; PI: percentage of irrigation amount to ETt; PP: percentage of
precipitation to ETt; PS: percentage of soil water depletion amount to ETt.
*, **Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.
Distinct letters in the row indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Relationship between irrigation amount (I) and total evapotranspiration (ETt).
obtained the highest ET of 109.2 mm in 2008-2009 and 144.1 mm in 2009-2010, followed by I75, which increased ET by
25.8 mm in 2008-2009 and 13.7 mm in 2009-2010 compared with that of I70. However, in anthesis to maturity stage, I75
increased ET relative to Ick by 11.3 and 25.7 mm, and the ratios to ETt also increased by 16.6% and 15.7% in 2008-2009
and 2009-2010, respectively.
I75 possessed the higher ratio to ETt from the anthesis to maturity stage than other treatments in both growing seasons.
This finding suggests that although lower ET occurred in I75 during the entire growing season, it was mainly distributed
in the anthesis to maturity stage, which requires the highest water demand of wheat. This finding may explain why I75
generated higher grain yield and WUE.
Table 5. Evapotranspiration (ET) of individual growth stages and their ratios to total evapotranspiration (ETt).
ET of individual growth stages (mm) Ratio to ETt (%)
Sowing to Jointing to Anthesis to Sowing to Jointing to Anthesis to
Treatments jointing anthesis maturity jointing anthesis maturity
2008-2009
I0 156.9b 36.3d 167.1d 43.5a 10.1c 46.4b
I70 156.9b 39.2c 203.8c 39.2b 9.8d 51.0a
I75 156.9b 65.0b 227.1a 34.9c 14.5b 50.6a
Ick 171.9a 109.2a 215.8b 34.6c 22.0a 43.4c
ANOVA * ** ** ** ** **
2009-2010
I0 156.7b 106.5d 178.1c 35.5a 24.1b 40.4c
I70 156.7b 116.5c 211.2b 32.3b 24.1b 43.6b
I75 156.7b 130.2b 241.3a 29.7c 24.6b 45.7a
Ick 186.4a 144.1a 215.6b 34.1a 26.4a 39.5c
ANOVA * ** ** ** * **
The duration days from sowing to jointing, joint to anthesis and anthesis to maturity are 183, 22 and
38 d in 2008-2009, and 188, 25 and 36 d in 2009-2010, respectively.
*, **Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.
Distinct letters in the row indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05).
Table 6. Effects of different treatments on DM distribution in different organs at maturity in winter wheat.
2008-2009
I0 7226.4c 44.5b 9012.6c 55.5a
I70 8186.6b 47.5a 9048.4c 52.5b
I75 9196.2a 46.7a 10496.0b 53.3b
Ick 9163.3a 44.1b 11475.0a 55.9a
ANOVA ** * ** *
2009-2010
I0 7514.4c 44.2b 9486.6d 55.8a
I70 8779.7b 46.9a 9940.3c 53.1b
I75 9435.0a 46.2a 10987.0b 53.8b
Ick 9466.2a 44.0b 12048.0a 56.0a
ANOVA ** * ** *
*, **Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.
Distinct letters in the row indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s
test (P ≤ 0.05).
Relationship between ETt and DM accumulation amount and relationship between ETt and grain yield
According to Zhang et al. (2008), biomass at heading and maturity and DMAA from heading to maturity (post-heading
DM) have a quadratic relationship with ET. In our study, however, a linear correlation was observed between ETt and
DMAA. With the increase in ETt, DMAA increased in both growing seasons (Figure 5).
Table 7. Grain yield and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE).
Treatments Grain yield WUE IWUE
kg ha-1 kg ha-1 mm-1
2008-2009
I0 7307.3c 20.3a -
I70 8155.0b 20.4a 17.8a
I75 9085.5a 20.2a 17.8a
Ick 9018.0a 18.2b 9.5b
ANOVA ** * **
2009-2010
I0 7617.6c 17.3a -
I70 8710.1b 18.0a 11.5b
I75 9431.9a 17.9a 13.4a
Ick 9426.3a 17.3a 10.0c
ANOVA ** ns **
WUE: Water use efficiency.
*, **Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. ns: Nonsignificant.
Distinct letters in the row indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s
test (P ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Summer is rainy in the North China Plain (NCP), and soil water can replenish winter wheat to a certain extent. In this
study, a new irrigation method was adopted in which the relative soil water content (RSWC) of 0 to 140 cm soil layer was
tested before irrigation at the jointing and anthesis stages and the amount of supplemental irrigation was calculated using
a formula. The results indicate that the irrigation amount of supplemental irrigation based on SWC significantly decreases
compared with conventional irrigation but promotes the use of soil water and precipitation and increases the ratio to total
evapotranspiration (ETt) in the anthesis to maturity stage.
Figure 5. Relationship between total evapotranspiration (ETt) and DM accumulation amount (DMAA).
Figure 6. Relationship between total evapotranspiration (ETt) and grain yield (GY).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771717, 31101115), by the Natural
Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016CM34), and by the Project of China Agriculture Research System
(CARS-3-1-19).
REFERENCES
Abdelkhalek, A.A., Darwesh, R.K., and Mona, A.M.E. 2015. Response of some wheat varieties to irrigation and nitrogen
fertilization using ammonia gas in North Nile Delta region. Annals of Agricultural Science 60:245-256.
Ali, M.H., Hoque, M.R., Hassan, A.A., and Khair, A. 2007. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity, and economic
returns of wheat. Agricultural Water Management 92:151-161.
Bellague, D., M’Hammedi-Bouzina, M., and Abdelguerfi, A. 2016. Measuring the performance of perennial alfalfa with drought
tolerance indices. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research: 76:273-284.
Cai, T., Xu, H., Peng, D., Yin, Y., Yang, W., Ni, Y., et al. 2014. Exogenous hormonal application improves grain yield of wheat
by optimizing tiller productivity. Field Crops Research 155:172-183.
Cui, Y.K., Tian, Z.W., Zhang, X., Muhammad, A., Han, H.M., Jiang, D., et al. 2015. Effect of water deficit during vegetative
growth periods on post-anthesis photosynthetic capacity and grain yield in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Acta
Physiologiae Plantarum 37:196.
Dabach, S., N. Lazarovitch, Simunek, J., and Shani, U. 2013. Numerical investigation of irrigation scheduling based on soil
water status. Irrigation Science 31:27-36.
del Moral, L.F.G., Rhrarrabti, Y., Villegas, D., and Royo, C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat
under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agronomy Journal 95:266-274.
Fang, Q., Zhang, X.Y., Shao, L.V., Chen, S.Y., and Sun, H.Y. 2018. Assessing the performance of different irrigation systems on
winter wheat under limited water supply. Agricultural Water Management 196:133-143.
Hayriye, I., Mahmut, C., Ebru, K., Wolfgang, A.F., Burak, T., Yunus, B., et al. 2015. Irrigation-induced nitrate losses assessed
in a Mediterranean irrigation district. Agricultural Water Management 148:223-231.
Li, Q.Q., Liu, M.Y., Zhang, J.W., Dong, B.D., and Bai, Q. 2009. Biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency of winter
wheat under deficit irrigation regimes. Plant Soil and Environment 55:85-91.
Li, P., Wu, P.T., and Chen, J.L. 2012a. Evaluation of flag leaf chlorophyll content index in 30 spring wheat genotypes under three
irrigation regimes. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6:1123-1130.
Li, Q.Q., Zhou, X.B., Chen, Y.H., and Yu, S.L. 2012b. Water consumption characteristics of winter wheat grown using different
planting patterns and deficit irrigation regime. Agricultural Water Management 105:8-12.
Liu, E.K., Mei, X.R., Yan, C.R., Gong, D.Z., and Zhang, Y.Q. 2016. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics, dry
matter translocation and WUE in two winter wheat genotypes. Agricultural Water Management 167:75-85.
Lv, L.H., Wang, H.J., Jia, X.L., and Wang, Z.M. 2011. Analysis on water requirement and water-saving amount of wheat and
corn in typical regions of the North China Plain. Frontiers of Agriculture in China 5:556-562.
Man, J.G., Yu, Z.W., Zhang, Y.L., Shi, Y., and Wang, L.Q. 2016. Water and nitrogen use of winter wheat under different
supplemental irrigation regimes. Crop Science 56:1-13.
Moussa, A.M., and Abdel-Maksoud, H.H. 2004. Effect of soil moisture regime on yield and its components and water use
efficiency for some wheat cultivars. Annals Agricultural Sciences 49:515-530.
Peake, A.S., Carberry, P.S., Raine, S.R., Gett, V., and Smith, R.J. 2016. An alternative approach to whole-farm deficit
irrigation analysis: Evaluating the risk-efficiency of wheat irrigation strategies in sub-tropical Australia. Agricultural Water
Management 169:61-76.
Rao, S.S., Regar, P.L., Tanwar, S.P.S., and Singh, Y.V. 2013. Wheat yield response to line source sprinkler irrigation and soil
management practices on medium-textured shallow soils of arid environment. Irrigation Science 31:1185-1197.