Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marc LL Mktg. v. Joson
Marc LL Mktg. v. Joson
Marc LL Mktg. v. Joson
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
36
37
VOL. 662, DECEMBER 12, 2011 37
38
39
40
_______________
1 Penned by Associate Justice Salvador J. Valdez, Jr. with Associate
Justices Mariano C. Del Castillo (now a member of this Court) and
Magdangal M. De Leon, concurring. Rollo, pp. 34-52.
2 Penned by Commissioner Victoriano R. Calaycay with Presiding
Commissioner Raul T. Aquino and Commissioner Angelita A. Gacutan,
concurring. Id., at pp. 124-133.
41
_______________
3 Penned by Labor Arbiter Pablo C. Espiritu, Jr. Id., at pp. 81-88.
4 Penned by Associate Justice Magdangal M. De Leon with Associate
Justices Edgardo P. Cruz and Mariano C. Del Castillo (now a Member of
this Court), concurring. Id., at pp. 54-55.
5 Articles of Incorporation of Marc II Marketing, Inc. Id., at p. 59.
42
_______________
6 As evidenced by its Certificate of Incorporation bearing S.E.C. Reg.
No. AS094-007318. Id., at p. 58.
7 Id., at pp. 56-57.
8 It was incorporated on 24 July 1984 as evidenced by its Certificate of
Incorporation bearing S.E.C. Reg. No. 121722. CA Rollo, p. 228.
9 Per Management Contract dated 16 January 1994. Rollo, pp. 56-57.
10 CA Rollo, p. 239.
11 Id., at pp. 235-242.
12 Id., at p. 183.
13 Id., at pp. 177-190.
43
_______________
14 Per Secretary’s Certificate. Rollo, p. 69.
15 Id.
16 Id., at p. 70.
17 NLRC Resolution dated 15 October 2002. CA Rollo, p. 20.
18 Court of Appeals Decision dated 20 June 2005. Rollo, p. 39.
44
_______________
19 This is pursuant to Section 5.2 of Republic Act No. 8799, known as
“Securities Regulation Code,” which was signed into law on 19 July 2000.
It expressly provides that: “The Commission’s jurisdiction over all cases
enumerated under section 5 of Presidential Decree No. 902-A is hereby
transferred to the Courts of general jurisdiction or the
appropriate Regional Trial Court: Provided, That the Supreme Court
in the exercise of its authority may designate the Regional Trial Court
branches that shall exercise jurisdiction over the cases. The Commission
shall retain jurisdiction over pending cases involving intra-corporate
disputes submitted for final resolution which should be resolved within
one (1) year from the enactment of this Code. The Commission shall retain
jurisdiction over pending suspension of payment/rehabilitation cases filed
as of 30 June 2000 until finally disposed. [Emphasis supplied.]
20 Penned by Labor Arbiter Pablo C. Espiritu, Jr. CA Rollo, pp. 191-
192.
21 Id., at pp. 193-194.
45
_______________
22 Labor Arbiter’s Decision dated 1 October 2001. Rollo, pp. 87-88.
46
_______________
23 Id., at p. 132.
24 NLRC Resolution dated 15 October 2002. CA Rollo, pp. 23-24.
25 Penned by Presiding Commissioner Victoriano R. Calaycay with
Presiding Commissioner Raul T. Aquino and Commissioner Angelita A.
Gacutan, concurring. Id., at pp. 27-28.
47
_______________
26 Rollo, pp. 51-52.
27 Per Court of Appeals Resolution dated 7 March 2006. Id., at pp. 54-55.
48
III.
ASSUMING GRATIS ARGUENDO THAT THE NLRC HAS
JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE, THE COURT OF APPEALS
ERRED IN NOT RULING THAT THE LABOR ARBITER
COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN
AWARDING MULTI-MILLION PESOS IN COMPENSATION
AND BACKWAGES BASED ON THE PURPORTED GROSS
INCOME OF [PETITIONER CORPORATION].
IV.
THE COURT OF APPEALS SERIOUSLY ERRED AND
COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN NOT
MAKING ANY FINDINGS AND RULING THAT [PETITIONER
LUCILA] SHOULD NOT BE HELD SOLIDARILY LIABLE IN
THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE OF MALICE AND BAD FAITH
ON HER PART.28
_______________
28 Petition for Review. Id., at pp. 10-11.
49
_______________
29 Article 217. Jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiters and the Com-
mission.—(a) Except as otherwise provided under this Code, the Labor
Arbiters shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and
decide, within thirty (30) calendar days after the submission of the case by
the parties for decision without extension, even in the absence of
stenographic notes, the following cases involving all workers,
whether agricultural or non-agricultural:
1. x x x.
2. Termination disputes; [Emphasis supplied.]
50
_______________
30 Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. v. King, 514 Phil. 296, 302;
478 SCRA 102, 109 (2005).
31 Sec. 5. In addition to the regulatory and adjudicative functions of
the Securities and Exchange Commission over corporations, partnerships
and other forms of associations registered with it as expressly granted
under existing laws and decrees, it shall have original and exclusive
jurisdiction to hear and decide cases involving:
(a) Devices or schemes employed by or any acts, of the board of
directors, business associates, its officers or partnership,
amounting to fraud and misrepresentation which may be
detrimental to the interest of the public and/or of the stockholder,
partners, members of associations or organizations registered with
the Commission;
(b) Controversies arising out of intra-corporate or partnership
relations, between and among stockholders, members, or
associates; between any or all of them and the corporation,
partnership or association of which they are stockholders, members
or associates, respectively; and between such corporation,
partnership or association and the state insofar as it concerns their
individual franchise or right to exist as such entity; and
(c) Controversies in the election or appointments of directors,
trustees, officers or managers of such corporations, partnerships or
associations.
51
_______________
32 Matling Industrial and Commercial Corporation v. Coros, G.R. No.
157802, 13 October 2010, 633 SCRA 12, 21-22.
33 Nacpil v. Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, 429 Phil. 410,
416; 379 SCRA 653, 659 (2002); Union Motors Corporation v. The National
Labor Relations Commission, 373 Phil. 310, 319; 314 SCRA 531, 538-539
(1999).
34 Sec. 25. Corporate officers, quorum.—Immediately after their
election, the directors of a corporation must formally organize by the
election of a president, who shall be a director, a treasurer who may or
may not be a director, a secretary who shall be a resident and citizen of
the Philippines, and such other officers as may be provided for in the by-
laws. Any two (2) or more positions may be held concurrently by the same
person, except that no one shall act as president and secretary or as
president and treasurer at the same time.
The directors or trustees and officers to be elected shall perform the
duties enjoined on them by law and the by-laws of the corporation. Unless
the articles of incorporation or the by-laws provide for a greater majority,
a majority of the number of directors or trustees as fixed in the articles of
incorporation shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of corporate
business, and every decision of at least a majority of the directors or
trustees present at a meeting at which there is a quorum shall be valid as
a corporate act, except for the election of officers which shall require the
vote of a majority of all the members of the board.
Directors or trustees cannot attend or vote by proxy at board meetings.
52
_______________
35 Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. v. King, supra note 30 at p. 302; p. 109.
53
_______________
36 Matling Industrial and Commercial Corporation v. Coros, supra
note 32 at 26-27.
37 ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
Section 1. Election/Appointment.—Immediately after their election,
the Board of Directors shall formally organize by electing the Chairman,
the President, one or more Vice-President, the Treasurer, and the
Secretary, at said meeting.
The Board may, from time to time, appoint such other officers as it may
determine to be necessary or proper.
Any two (2) or more positions may be held concurrently by the same
person, except that no one shall act as President and Treasurer or
Secretary at the same time.
38 CA Rollo, pp. 183-186.
54
_______________
39 Id.
40 Matling Industrial and Commercial Corporation v. Coros, supra
note 32 at p. 27.
55
_______________
41 Id., at p. 27.
42 Id.
56
57
_______________
43 Rollo, pp. 48-49.
44 Nacpil v. Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, supra note 33
at p. 416; p. 658; Union Motors Corporation v. The National Labor
Relations Commission, supra note 33 at p. 319; pp. 538-539.
45 Real v. Sangu Philippines, Inc. and/or Kiichi Abe, G.R. No. 168757,
19 January 2011, 640 SCRA 67.
58
_______________
46 Eastern Overseas Employment Center, Inc. v. Bea, 512 Phil. 749,
759; 476 SCRA 384, 394 (2005).
59
_______________
47 Industrial Timber Corporation v. Ababon, 515 Phil. 805, 819; 480
SCRA 171, 183-184 (2006).
60
_______________
48 Id., at p. 818; pp. 182-183.
49 Id., at p. 819; p. 184. See also Alabang Country Club, Inc. v.
National Labor Relations Commission, 503 Phil. 937, 952-953; 466 SCRA
329, 345 (2005).
61
_______________
50 G.R. No. 117473, 15 April 1997, 271 SCRA 247.
51 Id., at p. 254.
52 G.R. No. 165381, 9 February 2011, 642 SCRA 338.
62
_______________
53 Id.
54 Shimizu Phils. Contractors, Inc. v. Callanta, G.R. No. 165923, 29
September 2010, 631 SCRA 529, 542-543.
63
VOL. 662, DECEMBER 12, 2011 63
Marc II Marketing, Inc. vs. Joson
64
_______________
56 494 Phil. 114, 122-123; 454 SCRA 119, 127-128 (2005).
65
_______________
57 Reahs Corporation v. National Labor Relations Commission, supra
note 51 at p. 255.
66