Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internal Resistance IA PDF
Internal Resistance IA PDF
Aim: The aim of this experiment is to determine the EMF, (V) and Internal Resistance, (Ω) of
a dry cell.
Design
Research Question:
How does total external load, ( ) on the electrical circuit affect the current, (A) drawn from
the power supply?
Hypothesis:
The reading on a voltmeter, when connected across a power supply such as a dry cell, is found
to be larger when it is passive, than when it is driving a current through an external load.
Theory suggests that the reason for this is the fact that the cell has an internal resistance, ,
which takes up part of the available EMF when current is flowing through the circuit. The
available EMF, , is therefore divided to the total external load, , and to the internal
resistance, of the power supply according to the equation;
1
On comparing the above equation to an equation of a straight line, i.e., we get,
Variables:
Protocol Diagram:
Dry Cell
Multimeter
Resistor
Procedure:
2
Data Collection and Processing
1. Table of Total external load, ( ) on the electrical circuit versus Current, (A) drawn
from the power supply
The true value of Internal resistance, (Ω) of the power supply (dry cell) was not known.
Data Processing
The smallest reading on the multimeter was 0.1 10-6 A. Since the instrument was digital,
therefore the absolute error was the smallest reading of the instrument.
Therefore,
Absolute error of the multimeter = The smallest reading on the instrument
= 1.00 10-7 A
However, the uncertainties used in the calculations were the residual effects of the average of
the 3 values of the current, (A) drawn from the power supply.
3
Overview:
Firstly, the average current, (A) drawn from the power supply was calculated by dividing the
sum of the three readings of current, (A) drawn from the power supply by 3.
A graph of total external load, (Ω) on the electrical circuit versus (A-1) with and
as error bars was plotted.
Also, a line of best fit (black), line of maximum gradient (red) and the line of minimum gradient
(green) were also plotted, on the same graph, with their equation displayed.
Sample Calculations:
All the following calculations have been done using the value .
4
The following graph was plotted:
Graph of total external load, (Ω) on the electrical circuit versus (A-1) with and
as error bars was plotted.
Presentation
5
Graphs:
5000
y = 0.6570x + 62.5281
4000 y = 0.6567x + 64.745
1/I (A-1)
3000
2000
y = 0.6565x + 66.087
1000
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
Total external load, R ( ) on the electrical circuit
Note:
The vertical error bars were really small as compared to the value of
The y-intercept of the line of best fit, rather than being a value between the y-intercept of line
of minimum gradient and the y-intercept of line of maximum gradient, was outside the range.
The gradient of the line of best fit, rather than being a value between the gradient of line of
minimum gradient and the gradient of line of maximum gradient, was outside the range.
6
Conclusion and Evaluation
Conclusion:
From the graph of total external load, (Ω) on the electrical circuit versus (A-1), it was
concluded that as increased, increased. This supports the hypothesis.
From the graph of total external load, (Ω) on the electrical circuit versus (A-1) , the gradient
was .
From the graph, the equation of the line of best fit (black) was y = 0.6570x + 62.5281
Therefore,
The equation of the line of maximum gradient (red) was y = 0.6567x + 64.745
Therefore,
7
The equation of the line of minimum gradient (green) was y = 0.6565x + 66.087
Therefore,
The value of found from the line of best fit did not lie in the range however, for calculation
purposes this value was used.
From the graph of total external load, (Ω) on the electrical circuit versus (A-1), the y-
intercept was .
From the graph, the equation of the line of best fit (black) was y = 0.6570x + 62.5281
The value of internal resistance, (Ω) of the power supply (dry cell) was determined.
Therefore,
8
From the graph, the equation of the line of maximum gradient (red) was y = 0.6567x + 64.745
The value of internal resistance, (Ω) of the power supply (dry cell) was determined.
Therefore,
From the graph, the equation of the line of minimum gradient (green) was y = 0.6565x + 66.087
The value of internal resistance, (Ω) of the power supply (dry cell) was determined.
Therefore,
The value of found from the line of best fit did not lie in the range however, for calculation
purposes this value was used.
The plotted points were in strong positive co‐relation. The error bars were quite small which
shows that there was a really small random error in the readings. Since the value of the random
error was so small, they were not visible in the graph.
9
Since the true value of Internal resistance, (Ω) of the power supply (dry cell) was not known
therefore, it was difficult to evaluate the value and existence of systematic error.
The literature value of was . But, the value of found from the experiment was
.
This showed that there was a really small error in the value of
The experiment was designed to determine the EMF, (V) and Internal Resistance, (Ω) of a
dry cell.
The EMF, (V) of the dry cell may not be exactly the value mentioned on the dry cell. It may be
higher or lower than the value mentioned.
The temperature at which the experiment is carried out is not constant. This fluctuation affects
the resistance because temperature and resistance are directly proportional.
The EMF, (V) of the dry cell is not constant because the cell is run down (Since it is switched
on for the whole experiment.) This influences the readings of the variables of the experiment.
The systematic error can be prevented from occurring by ensuring the multimeter did not have
a zero error.
The temperature can be kept constant by keeping the AC switched off and the windows shut.
The EMF, (V) of the dry cell can be kept constant by switching off the battery at regular
intervals. This will also stop the battery from running down.
The actual EMF, (V) of the dry cell was 1.535 V when measured. It was higher than the value
mentioned on the cell. This, thus, influences the calculations done.
10