International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

Volume 4 Issue 3, April 2020 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470

Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation and Relay Selection

Schemes for D2D Communications in 5G Wireless Networks
Surya S M1, Prof. K. Kalai Selvi2
1PG Student, Department of Communication Systems,
2Assistant Professor (RD), Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering,
1,2Government College of Engineering, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India

ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Surya S M | Prof.

Device-to-Device (D2D) communication is a wireless peer-to-peer service, that K. Kalai Selvi "Energy-Efficient Resource
allows direct communication to discharge hub input by binding wireless Allocation and Relay Selection Schemes
broadcasting amongst devices, as a vital technology module for next- for D2D Communications in 5G Wireless
generation cellular communication system. Mobile devices limited battery Networks" Published
power is a barricade for harnessing the performance of cellular in International
communication systems. High data rate Device-to-Device communication is Journal of Trend in
requisite to boost the crescent traffic requirement of apparent applications. In Scientific Research
this paper suggest a centralized relay selection and power allocation process and Development
to state a multi-objective optimization trouble to clearance the commutation (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
in between total transmit power and system throughput. The proposed 6470, Volume-4 | IJTSRD30413
framework, suggest lowest perplexity modulation and demodulation Issue-3, April 2020,
procedure by route discovery for Generalized frequency division multiplexing pp.788-794, URL:
systems. The proposed diplomacy deed the peculiar framework of the www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30413.pdf
modulation matrix to depress the computational rate in the absence of meet
with any performance loss distress. Centralized algorithm to discover the Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and
outcome in polynomial time. Proposed algorithms markedly minimize the International Journal of Trend in Scientific
total transmit power and enhance the system throughput. Research and Development Journal. This
is an Open Access article distributed
KEYWORDS: Full-duplex relaying, D2D communication, multi-objective under the terms of
optimization, matching theory the Creative
Commons Attribution
License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
/4.0)
I. INTRODUCTION
The actual modifications and employ technics processing in D2D relation cause the payoff of elevated data rate, increased
the field of strewing hub on task for the unending swell bid spectrum and too make perfect link capacity. It can equally
for bandwidth. Alongside with progression in bandwidth dump input from the base stations whereas fulfill the
condensed appliance, the amount of devices by oneness interference levels and avert congestion. In reckoning to the
domain is evenly swelling explicitly. The well-known fourth aforementioned payoff, it get along with with long-
generation (4G) cellular systemsemploy the technologies like established existent connection. The 5G elemental high tech
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), are promote to negotiate the range deficiency by scout about
Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO), massive small cell the mmWave scale. Due to raised recurrence, succinct
deployment, Heterogeneous Network (Het Net) and relays are disparity fading possessions and meteorological inhalation,
proficient by upgrading the efficiency. Only such technologies mmWave intercommunication is an insufficient field revelation.
would not be accomplished to render the crescent claim Outdoor propagation render affluent multi-path at and above
towards taunt bandwidth[1]. 28 GHz frequency, exploitant which the gain acquire signal
capability can be mended. Directional beam forming and
Therefore, researchers are look for latest renegade pattern in smart antennas enhance the advancement withadvanced
cellular connections. Thus, the fifth generation (5G) cellular grade connections. Thus, the consolidation of D2D
technology would be contracted to surmount the range automation with mmWave intercommunication wish sake the
destitution and serve out another users, beyond 4G. The 5G interest of both the scientific knowledge.
automation would operate Millimeter Wave (mmWave)
range for automation, where the range is matchless analyze to A. Existing System
the cellular setup manage in frequencies. Device-to-Device In a regular structural grid, client input is transmissible via
(D2D) communication have the potential to improve the hub once UE is exchanging together with dissimilar one. Yet
spectrum efficiency between two mobile users by allowing whether the two UEs are relativement from each other, be in
nearby devices within a cellular network outwardly touch just instead of using base station it should be sensible
penetrate the hub, and is a obstreperous technology guidance from transmit power of both UEs and base station, core
over 5G. network as well as radio access could be enregistered. These
are deployed through device to device communication.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 788
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
However, under there are group of protocol enhancements
and easy to use limits for D2D intercommunication similar as:
conflict to and from primitive network, a new paradigm may
be poor quality than network performance between base
station and UEs and define QoS requirements of D2D
communication.
In this project, performance of relay selection in relay assisted
multiple network, which differs from typical relay aided D2D
users is discussed in the following aspects.
1. Choosing a relay in underlaying cellular network should
coordinate the end-users to and from integral network.
2. The propagation channels of source- destination (S-D)
link and relay-destination (R-D) link also be elegant in
trim to assurer reliable and direct communication of
both Cellular UEs and D2D UEs.
Since centralized algorithm claim exact channel state
information (CSI) of all links including the channels between
cellular UEs and base station, among UEs in the base station
should be involved by reducing the effect of interference,
ensue in the inflation of base stations load. Hence, propose a
distributed relay selection method. This method at first
synchronize the intrusion sustain by the coexistence of D2D
system and rule out improper relays in the system. Next, to
the highest relay is exclusive and set to each users amongst
the permissive relays undermine a facile distributed method.
Numerical outcome spectacle that depiction of the proposed
framework is overtake than process that randomly pick best
relay and made close to the centralized method.
B. System Model
The Multiple Cellular UEs intercommunicate with base station
on M different cellular networks which may not be in near
proximity can be reused by traditional UEs during both uplink
(UL) and downlink (DL) . The D2D UEs must ensure their
power constraints and sharing of cellular resources operate
in same frequency spectrum that result in the failure of
cellular link. During the uplink period, D2D UEs only need to
keeps the interference of their signals within the wireless
users, that are disjoint of licensed network. Contribution
management view at entire authorized users if they degrade
the downlink resources of cellular users. Thus, we desire to
provide the appropriate resources and focusing on the uplink
interference yield by the cointegrate of the channel-based
resource allocation.
In particular we define that there are control channels to find
the best cellular resource between the D2D users and route
discovery. Channel state information (CSI) increases the
complexity and assumptive to be best at the receiver, but the
forward and backward channels are formal. As a outcome, CSI
can obtained by transmitter through an effective way response
from the receiver. At the same time, both the D2D pairs and
optional relays cannot acquire CSI between base stations ,
and no interference communicate to each users. Channel
selection and base station interference is not calculated
accurately.
The contribution of existing state of this paper is organized as
follows. In Section II the channel model is introduced. Section
III introduces the rate estimation frame work. A compressive
measurement protocol is presented and linear as well as non-
linear estimators that operate on the compressive
measurements are introduced. Finally in Section IV conclusion
is drawn.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3
II. PROPOSED SYSTEM
Full duplex relays are fixed between two users to collaborate
with D2D users which user have poor direct link quality or to
allocate an extended good communication range. The
extended communication sends the modulation signal to base
station and control messages send through the control
channel to other users and to systematize the redeployment
of resources. For allocation of resource we denote the set of
relays as R. The propagation channel of source and destination
which determine by receiver of whole system are point out
by S and D, respectively.
We have to undertake that the destination and D2D users are
with the unchanging provider of service. The relays which
assist nearby D2D pairs can share frequency resources that
the time domain owns, while those users that do not desire
additional signal dimension to use different spectral
resources. Relaying mechanism can aid multiple D2D
communication and propose a distributed solution using
spectrum utilization. Every relay in D2D pairs is processed
with set of antennas that operate in full- duplex mode. The
relay protocol used in full duplex is decode-and-forward
protocol which is employed by the relays to analyze the
performance of relay network. As discussed in 3GPP long
term evolution system and related researchers, each D2D
user pair is assigned using communication pairs of both
uplink and downlink resource in dedicated mode, where
new interference among users is negligible. The D2D user
pairs communicate directly between portable nearby
wireless devices in dedicated base station and are distributed
over same shared cellular spectrum.
By considering the possible non-line-of-sight(NLOS) channel
modeling can be improved . The main objective is to
minimize the power consumption of mobile devices also
improve the system throughput. Single-objective problem
formulation is different from multi-objective combinatorial
optimization problem it balances the trade-off between total
transmit power and system throughput.
Fig.1. Proposed Block Diagram
A. Channel Model
Latterly, over 10 GHz of frequency above 24 GHz is vacant by
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for fifth
generation wireless communications. The features of low
latency of the mm Wave frequency bands support 38 GHz
band.
Here consider relay-assisted D2D communication in
millimeter system that operates on the frequency of 38 GHz.
| March-April 2020 Page 789
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
The mmWave communication channel model is different
from the current cellular channel model. One important
difference is that multiple D2D pairs require directional
antennas. By adopting the channel model introduced in peer-
to-peer wireless communication and consider a completely
different frequency band for both line-of-sight (LOS) andnon
line-of-sight( NLOS) cases. We consider potential NLOS
communications if the line-of-sight is blocked due to
reflections. Let z denote the distancebetween the transmitter
and receiver. The path loss function L(z) in dB is
Where (L_LOS ) (Z_0 ) and (L_NLOS ) (Z_0 ) are the free-space
path losses at reference distance z0 for line-of-sight and non
line-of-sight signals, respectively. Moreover, α_LOS and
α_NLOS are the path loss exponents for LOS and NLOS cases,
and Zσ_LOS and Zσ_NLOS are zero-mean Gaussian random
variables with standard deviations σ_LOS and α_NLOS that
model the deployed schemes of LOS and NLOS real systems.LOS
and NLOS parameters is determined by channel estimation.
Channel estimation is performed by the transmitter and
receiver channel periodically to manage resources by
overlapping and minimizing pilot sequences orthogonally.
In mm Wave technology, antenna gain is improved by
directional antennas. A sectored directional transmitting
antenna channel model is proposed at the center of the cell.
The general equation to model the channel gain of antenna is
given as:
G (dB) = Antenna gain-path loss-Shadowing.
Here use sectored directional antenna channel model, where
the main lobe achieve a constant high gain and side lobe
achieve a constant low gain . Let t represent the angle of
departure of channel. The transmitting antenna gain is given
as follows:
where ‫ ݐ ܯ‬, ݉‫ ݐ‬, ܽ݊݀ ⊝‫ ݐ‬are the main lobe gain, side lobe gain,
and half power beamwidth for the transmitting antenna,
respectively. Similarly, let ⊝^r represent the angle of arrival
of signals. The receiving antenna gain is given as follows:
Where ‫ݎܯ‬, ݉‫ݎ‬, ܽ݊݀ ⊝‫ ݎ‬are the main lobe gain, side lobe gain,
and half power beam width for the receiving antenna,
respectively. The antenna gain between i and j devices is
denoted as
where ⊝݅.݆‫ ݐ‬is the angle of departure of channel from
transmitter i to receiver j, and ⊝݆,݅‫ ݎ‬is the angle of arrival of
channel in receiver j sent from transmitter i. If i and j belong
to transmitting and receiving pair of communicating devices,
⊝݅.݆‫ ݐ‬and ⊝݆,݅‫ ݎ‬are both 0∘.
we assume the transmitting and receiving antennas
frequency resource are aligned accurately. The total gain of
antenna and channel gains between transmitter i and
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3
receiver j can be represented as hℎ݅,݆=‫݅ܩ‬,݆/‫݅ݖ(ܮ‬,݆), where ‫݅ݖ‬,݆
is the distance between the corresponding devices.
B. Throughput of a User Pair
To determine the throughput of a user pair, first require the
signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) in each hop of
the D2D communication. For user pair ݈݅=(‫݅ݏ‬,݀݅) which is
assisted by relay rj , we denote Psi, rj as the transmit power
of source device si to relay rj. We denote the transmit power
of relay rj to destination device di as Prj, di. The signal-to-
interference plus noise ratio from source si to relay rj is
where hLI, Prj, di represents the loop-interference received
by full-duplex relay rj and N0 is the noise power. In each
group the loop-interference channel gain hLI to determine
the loop-interference power received by the full-duplex
relay. The loop interference channel gain hLI is defined as
the ratio between the transmit power of full-duplex relay
and received loop-interference power. Imperfect loop-
interference cancellation is due to leakage of power from the
transmitter to its receiver in full-duplex relay. The user pair
of each orthogonal channel is allocated to avoid the mutual
interference of user pairs . The SINR from relay rj to device
of destination di is
where ℎ‫݅ݏ‬,݀݅ܲ‫݅ݏ‬,‫ ݆ݎ‬is the interference induced by source
device si. In mm wave communications the source-to-relay
SINR and relay-to-destination SINR is possible in NLOS due
to reflections it affects the directional transmission. High
transmit power induces a higher loop interference due to
multi-objective optimization problem.
By using a decode-and-forward protocol, in a full-duplex
relaying system the throughput of each user pair li ∈L
assisted by relay rj ∈R can be obtained from transmit power
of mobile devices is
III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
In this work design we propose a joint relay selection and
power allocation algorithm in mm wave based wireless
networks for full duplex relay-assisted D2D communication .
Initially we set 100 nodes for D2D communication.
Fig.2. Node Creation
| March-April 2020 Page 790
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
After creating the node the relay allocation process is
started. Two relay allocation algorithm is used that are
Centralized Relay Selection and Power Allocation Algorithm,
Distributed Relay Selection and Power Allocation Algorithm.

Fig.6. Total transmit power versus number of D2D user

pairs

Fig.3. One-to-one matching with virtual relays

Fig.7. Total transmit power versus number of relays In

the fig 1.6 and 1.7 shows the

transmit power of D2D user pair and relays. Compare the total
Fig.4. Total transmit power versus number of D2D user transmit power of devices in our proposed algorithms with
pairs that obtained by ARS and DRS algorithms for different
number of D2D user pairs. The proposed centralized
algorithm substantially outperforms ARS. The proposed
distributed algorithm outperforms DRS. The centralized
algorithm results less transmit power than ARS i.e) 37%, and
our distributed algorithm achieves less transmit power than
DRS i.e) 26%. The optimal solution is achieved by centralized
algorithm based on stable matching in proposed distributed
algorithm with weighted matching obtain a exceed solution
than DRS.

Fig.5. System throughput versus number of D2D user

pairs

In the fig 1.4 and 1.5 shows the transmit power and system
throughput of D2D user pair. Here the transmit power of
proposed system is very low compare to existing system. So
it saves the energy of the D2D user pairs. The system
throughput of proposed system is very high compare to
existing system. So the proposed system is provide high Fig .8. Total transmit power versus loop-interference
speed communication channel gain

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 791
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
The fig 1.8. shows the total transmit power versus different
loop-interference channel gain. The gain range should be
considered from -108dB to -100dB. If the total transmits
power increases as the loop-interference channel gain also
increases. This will result in a higher transmitting power due
to stronger loop-interference. The proposed centralized
algorithm achieves lower transmit power 38% compared to
ARS. The distributed algorithm achieves DRS by 32%.

Fig .11. System throughput versus loop-interference

channel gain

The fig 1.11 shows the System throughput versus loop-

interference channel gain. Compare the system throughput
versus different loop-interference channel gain. If the loop-
interference channel gain increases the system throughput
also slightly decreases. This will result in a lower throughput
due to stronger loop interference. However, our proposed
Fig.9. System throughput versus number of D2D user centralized algorithm always achieves a higher throughput
pairs than ARS and our distributed algorithm achieves throughput
than DRS.

Fig .10. System throughput versus number of relays

Fig.12. Optimal power consumption
In the fig 1.9 and 1.10 shows the System throughput of D2D
user pair and relays. When there are four relays in the
network compare the system throughput with different
number of D2D user pairs . The above results shows that our
proposed centralized algorithm achieves a higher throughput
and our proposed distributed algorithm obtains a higher
throughput compared to ARS and DRS under 13 D2D user
pairs. The centralized algorithm achieves 12% higher
throughput than ARS and our distributed algorithm
outperforms DRS by 15%. Improvement of throughput of
proposed algorithm over ARS and DRS increases the user pairs.
Relay selection and power allocation is obtained by
maximizing the throughput.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 792
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Fig.13. Optimal system throughput
Fig 1.12 and 1.13 shows the optimal power consumption and
Optimal system throughput. Centralized algorithm is
obtained by the optimal total transmit power and system
throughput when λ1 =1and we vary λ2. According to the
weight coefficient we have to observe that the optimal
solution is sensitive. λ2 is increased by improving the
throughput. Power is reduced by increased throughput. In
this case, more power is consumed to achieve a higher
throughput to find the optimal solution. The above results
also show that the increment of the throughput is not as fast
as the increment of the power. If the transmit power
increases the marginal throughput increment becomes
smaller . To balance the total transmit power and system
throughput the marginal throughput increment provides
useful insights of the system design.
IV. CONCLUSION
Thus, the relay-assisted D2D communication for full duplex
in mm wave based 5G networks using joint relay selection
and power allocation problem was formulated . Here, we
proposed modelling approach to balance the trade- off
between total transmit power and system throughput based
on multi-objective optimization problem . The optimization
problem eliminates loop-interference cancellation for mm
wave full- duplex relaying systems. The QoS requirements is
considered between D2D and cellular layers to explore the
possibilities for different applicationsas well as the proximity
and hop gains of peer discovery and relays. The problem
convergence with message passing strategy which is
complex to solve the proposed scheme using standard
optimization techniques. To mitigate the complexity of
resource allocation problem and combinatorial problem, we
extended potential D2D users along with the problem into a
one-to-one matching by considering weighted bipartite
graph. We then proposed a centralized algorithm to find the
solution in polynomial time. In proposed centralized
algorithm we proved solution obtained is Pareto optimal .To
reduce the overhead we further proposed a distributed
algorithm to imposed by exchanging message passing
strategies. The performance of our proposed algorithms is
evaluated through simulations. The above results showed
that our proposed algorithms solidly reduce the total transmit
power and improve the system throughput compared to
recently proposed algorithms in full duplex mode.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3
REFERENCES
[1] G. Zhang, K. Yang, P. Liu, and J. Wei, “Power allocation
for full-duplex relaying-based D2D communication
underlaying cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 4911–4916, Oct. 2015.
[2] H. Xing and M. Renfors, “Resource management schemes
for network assisted device-to-device communication
for an integrated OFDMA cellular system,” in Proc. IEEE
Int. Symp. Pers., Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC),
Hong Kong, Aug. 2015, pp. 1520–1525.
[3] H. A. Suraweera, I. Krikidis, G. Zheng, C. Yuen, and P. J.
Smith, “Low-complexity end-to-end performance
optimization in MIMO full duplex relay systems,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 913–927,
Feb. 2014.
[4] H. Shi, R. Prasad, V. Rao, I. Niemegeers, and M. Xu,
“Spectrum- and energy-efficient D2D WRAN,” IEEE
Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 38–45, Jul. 2014.
[5] F. Wang, C. Xu, L. Song, and Z. Han, “Energy- efficient
resource allocation for device-to-device underlay
communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.
14, no. 4, pp. 2082–2092, Apr. 2015.
[6] H. Zhang, L. Song, and Z. Han, “Radio resource
allocation for device-to device underlay
communication using hypergraph theory,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 4852– 4861, Jul.
2016.
[7] Krikidis, H. A. Suraweera, P. J. Smith, and C. Yuen, “Full-
duplex relay selection for amplify-and- forward
cooperative networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4381–4393, Dec. 2012.
[8] J. Qiao, X. Shen, J. Mark, Q. Shen, Y. He, and L. Lei, “Enabling
deviceto-device communications in millimeter-wave
5G cellular networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 1,
pp. 209–215, Jan. 2015.
[9] L. Wang, F. Tian, T. Svensson, D. Feng, M. Song, and S. Li,
“Exploiting full duplex for device-to-device
communications in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE
Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 146–152, May 2015.
[10] M. Hasan, E. Hossain, and D. I. Kim, “Resource allocation
under channel uncertainties for relay- aided device-to-
device communication underlaying LTE-A cellular
networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 4,
pp. 2322–2338, Apr. 2014.
[11] M. N. Tehrani, M. Uysal, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Device-
to-device, r communication in 5G cellular networks:
Challenges, solutions, and future directions,” IEEE
Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 86–92, May 2014.
[12] M. Sheng, Y. Li, X. Wang, J. Li, and Y. Shi, “Energy efficiency
and delay tradeoff in device-to-device communications
underlaying cellular networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 92–106, Jan. 2016.
[13] P. C. Nguyen and B. D. Rao, “Fair scheduling policies
exploiting multiuser diversity in cellular systems with
device-to-device communications,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 4757–4771, Sep.
2015.
[14] X. Lin, J. G. Andrews, and A. Ghosh, “Spectrum sharing
for deviceto-device communication in cellular
| March-April 2020 Page 793
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no.
12, pp. 6727–6740, Dec. 2014.
[15] P. Mach, Z. Becvar, and T. Vanek, “In-band device-to-
device communication in OFDMA cellular networks: A
survey and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts.,
vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1885–1922, 4th Quart., 2015.
[16] Enable Higher Frequency Spectrum for Future
Wireless, document FCC-16–89, Federal
Communications Commission, Jul. 2016.
[17] T. S. Rappaport et al., “Millimeter wave mobile
communications for 5G cellular: It will work!” IEEE
Access, vol. 1, pp. 335–349, May 2013.
[18] A. Alkhateeb, O. El Ayach, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, Jr.,
“Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for
millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics
Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 831–846, Oct. 2014.
[19] T. Bai and R. W. Heath, Jr., “Coverage and rate analysis
for millimeterwave cellular networks,” IEEE Trans.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30413 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3
Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1100– 1114, Feb.
2015.
[20] T. Riihonen, S. Werner, and R. Wichman, “Hybrid full-
duplex/halfduplex relaying with transmit power
adaptation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 10, no.
9, pp. 3074–3085, Sep. 2011
[21] X. Ma, R. Yin, G. Yu, and Z. Zhang, “A distributed relay
selection method for relay assisted device-to- device
communication system,” in Proc. IEEEInt. Symp.
Pers.,Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC), Sydney,
NSW, Australia, Sep. 2012, pp. 1020–1024.
[22] Ma, H. Shah-Mansouri, and V. W. S. Wong, “A matching
approach for power efficient relay selection in full
duplex D2D networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun.
(ICC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, May 2016, pp. 1–6.
[23] Technical Specification Group, Radio Access Network;
Study on LTE Device to Device Proximity Services-
Radio Aspects (Release 12) V. 12.0, document TR
36.843, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Mar. 2014.
| March-April 2020 Page 794