Anti-Hazing Act of 2018

R.A. No 11053

RA 11053 is an act prohibiting hazing and regulating other forms of

initiation rites of fraternities, sororities, and other organizations. This new
law amends RA 8049 or the Anti Hazing Act of 1995 and gives teeth to it as
it now outrightly prohibits and makes hazing a criminal act while providing
more substantial penalties for those who will be proven guilty.

Definition of Terms
As used in this Act:
a. Hazing refers to any act that results in physical or psychological
suffering, harm, or injury inflicted on a recruit, neophyte, applicant, or
member as part of an initiation rite or practice made as a prerequisite
for admission or a requirement for continuing membership in a
fraternity, sorority, or organization including, but not limited to
paddling, whipping, beating, branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to
the weather, forced consumption of any food, liquor, beverage, drug or
other substance, or any other brutal treatment or forced physical
activity which is likely to adversely affect the physical and
psychological health of such recruit, neophyte, applicant, or member.
This shall also include any activity, intentionally made or otherwise, by
one person alone or acting with others, that tends to humiliate or
embarrass, degrade, abuse, or endanger, by requiring a recruit,
neophyte, applicant, or member to do menial, silly, or foolish tasks.

b. Initiation or Initiation Rites refer to ceremonies, practices, rituals, or

other acts, weather formal or informal, that a person must perform or
take part in order to be accepted into fraternity, sorority, organization
as a full-fledged member. It includes ceremonies practices, rituals, and
other acts in all stages of membership in a fraternity, sorority, or
organization.

c. Organization refers to an organized body of people which includes, but

it is not limited to, any club, association, group, fraternity, and
sorority. This term shall include the Armed Forces of the Philippines
(AFP), the Philippine National Police (PNP), the Philippine Miltary
Academy (PMA), the Philippine National Police Academy (PNPA), and
other similar uniformed service learning institutions.

d. Schools refer to colleges, universities, and other educational

institutions.

Prohibited Act

Section 3 of R.A. No. 11053 prohibits all forms of hazing in fraternities,

sororities and organizations, may it be school-based, not school-based, or
citizen’s military and citizen’s army training.
Exemption:
R.A. No. 11053 qualifies that the physical, mental and psychological testing
and training procedure and practices to determine and enhance the physical,
mental, and psychological fitness of prospective regular members of the AFP
and the PNP, as approved by the Secretary of National Defense and National
Police Commission, duly recommended by the Chief of Staff of the AFP and
Director General of the PNP, shall not be considered as hazing.

Persons Liable for Hazing

1. Presence – Section 14 of R.A. No. 11053 punishes all persons who
are present in the conduct of hazing. However, the penalty is higher if
the persons who are present during the hazing are: (1) officers of
fraternity, sorority, or organization; (2) former officers, nonresident
members, or alumni thereof; and (3) members thereof who are
intoxicated or under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs.

2. Actual participation – The penalty for hazing is also higher if the

persons actually participated in the conduct of the hazing. The actual
participants are liable for hazing even if they are not members of the
fraternity, sorority or organizations.
Section 14 provides that the presence of any person, even if he is not
a member thereof, is a prima facie evidence of participation therein as
a principal unless such person or persons prevented the commission of
the acts punishable herein or promptly reported the same to the law
enforcement authorities if they can do so without peril to their persons
or their family

3. Planning – Under this law, all persons including non-members who

actually planned the conduct of the hazing are liable. Even though
these planners were not present when the acts constituting hazing
were committed, they shall still be liable principals.

4. Adviser – The liability of the adviser arises, not only from his mere
presence in the hazing, but also from his failure to prevent the same.

5. Inducement – Officers or members of a fraternity, sorority, or

organization, who knowingly cooperated in carrying out the hazing by
inducing the victim to be present thereat are liable for hazing.

6. Incumbent officers – The incumbent officers of the fraternity,

sorority, or organization concerned shall be jointly liable with those
members who actually participated in the hazing.

7. Owner or lessee – The law punishes the owner or the lessee of the
place where hazing is conducted as principal for hazing, when he has
actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take
action to prevent the same from occurring or failed to promptly report
the same to the law enforcement authorities if they can do so without
peril to their person or their family.

8. Parents – Under the law, if the hazing is held in the home of one of
the officers or members of the fraternity, sorority, or organization, the
parents shall be held liable as principals for hazing when they have
 actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take
action to prevent the same from occurring or failed to promptly report
the same to the law enforcement authorities if they can do so without
peril to their person or their family.

9. School Authorities/LGU officials – School Authorities including

faculty members as well as barangay, municipal, or city officials shall
be liable as an accomplice for hazing conducted by fraternities,
sororities, and other organizations if it can be shown that: (1) the
school or barangay, municipal, or city officials allowed or consented to
the conduct of hazing; or (2) where there is actual knowledge of
hazing, but such officials failed to take any action to prevent the same
from occurring or failed to promptly report the same to the law
enforcement authorities if they can do so without peril to their person
or their family

10. Obstruction of Justice – The law also punishes former officers,

nonresident members, or alumni of the fraternity, sorority, or
organization who, after the commission of hazing will perform any act
to hide, conceal, or otherwise hamper or obstruct any investigation
that will be conducted thereafter.

11. Forcible Recruitment – Any person who shall intimidate,

threaten, force, employ, or administer any form of vexation against
another person for the purpose of recruitment in joining or promoting
a particular fraternity, sorority, or organization shall be liable under
this law.

12. Corporate or Company Officers – In no case shall hazing be

made a requirement for employment in any business or corporation
under R.A. No. 11053. The president, manager, director or other
responsible officer of business or corporation engaged in hazing as a
requirement for employment are also criminally liable.

Nota Bene:
Any form of approval, consent, or agreement, whether written or otherwise,
or of an express waiver of the right to object to the initiation rite or
proceeding which consists of hazing, as defined in this Act, made by a
recruit, neophyte, or applicant prior to an initiation rite that involves
inflicting physical or psychological suffering, harm, or injury, shall be void
and without any binding effect on the parties.

Penalties:
1. Penalty of Reclusion Temporal and P1 million on the participating
officer and members of the fraternity who were involved in the hazing.

2. Reclusion Perpetua and P2 million on members who actually

participated in hazing when under the influence of alcohol or drugs;
and on non-resident or alumni who participate in hazing.

3. Reclusion Perpetua and P3 million on those who participated in hazing

that resulted in death, rape, sodomy, or mutilation * P1 million on the
 school if it approved an initiation of a fraternity, sorority or
organization where hazing occurred.

4. Prision Correccional (six months to six years) on anyone who

intimidates or threatens another for recruitment. This includes
"persistent and repeated" proposals or invitations to those who refused
to join at least twice.

5. P1 million for former officers or alumni who try to hide or obstruct an

investigation

6. If the offender is a member of the Bar, he or she shall be subject to

disciplinary proceedings by the Supreme Court. If the offender is in
another profession, he or she will be subject to regulation by the
Professional Regulation Commission.

Jurisprudence