Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fin Eco 4
Fin Eco 4
Fin Eco 4
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Introduction
Foreign investments are treasured by the developing countries for the simple fact that the
multinational companies (MNCs) not only deploy capital but also technology, processes,
knowledge, generate long term employment contributing in economic development of
their host countries which otherwise could not be arranged as conveniently by these
countries. Foreign investment refers to the flow of funds from one country to another
country in return for the claim in the form of ownership stakes of the concerned
companies or the assets of the companies. Generally, it involves the active participation
of the foreign investors in managing the capital, physical or technical investment in the
host country. Thereby, foreign investment is a broader term used for different concepts
like foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign institutional investment (FII). The
following chapter provides a descriptive account of FDI and FII.
Foreign Direct Investment or FDI can be defined as the investment made by an entity
residing in one country into an enterprise located in some foreign country. More
specifically, it is defined as the investment of foreign assets into domestic goods and
services. Its characteristics are:
a.) FDI signifies a long-term relationship between the investor and the enterprise which
unlike foreign institutional investments (FII) does not flow out of the country at the
first sign of trouble in an economy.
b.) The FDI generally involves the acquisition of management and voting rights with the
level of ownership greater than or equal to 10% of ordinary shares as the share
ownership less than 10% is categorized as FII.
c.) FDI involves both the initial and subsequent capital transactions between the investor
and the affiliated enterprise.
3.1 Classification of FDI
FDI can be classified into inward and outward FDI contingent on the direction of flow of
money.
a.) Inward FDI When the foreign assets (such as capital) are invested into a domestic
enterprise bringing the money into the base country then it is called as inward FDI.
This type of FDI is induced by the government by providing tax breaks, low interest
rates and grants.
specific objective has been achieved, the joint venture ceases to exist.
Example: A Japanese firm having the technology, process and expertise in building
motorbikes entered into a joint venture with an Indian firm to establish a business in
India. This JV assisted the foreign firm to grasp the rules and regulation, the legal,
cultural and business environment, and the respective market. This joint venture
established the firm which came to be famously known as Hero Honda, a joint venture
between Honda headquartered in Japan and Hero headquartered in India.
A JV can be spearheaded in any of the following manners:
i.) Acquisition of some percentage of shares of a local company by the foreign
investor.
ii.) Acquisition of some percentage of shares of a foreign company by the local
firm.
iii.) Both foreign and local entrepreneurs collaborating to establish a new venture/
enterprise.
iv.) Both foreign and local entrepreneurs collaborating to establish a new venture/
enterprise along with the engagement of public capital and/or bank debt.
Merits and demerits of pursuing JV route have been described below beginning with the
merits of Joint Venture for the contracting parties:
i.) The companies get the opportunity to gain from new technology and
processes.
ii.) In a JV, both the parties benefit by gaining easy access to vast resources,
technology, specialized skills and staff of each other.
The demerits of Joint Venture with the major area of conflict are:
i.) The imbalance in the expertise, investments and assets bought can become a
bone of contention between the contracting parties.
ii.) The difference in cultures and management styles often sows the roots of
dissatisfaction in the managers towards the whole JV project. If the integration
is not channelized through proper channel and expertise then JV have
experienced failure.
iii.) Different strategic views of different parties have often resulted in the
premature break-up of the joint venture. For example, the break-up of joint
ventures between Toyata-Kirloskar and Ford Mahindra owing to different
strategic views.
iv.) The technologically superior partner might not share technical expertise with
the other partner resulting in the loss of market to the fast advancing
competitors engaged in offering innovative products to the market. This
grievance served as one of the major reason causing the split between Hero
and Honda.
v.) The most recent popular split has been in the joint venture between Bharti and
Walmart. This split in the 6 year old joint venture occurred due the change in
the government policy that initially was favorable to foreign investment in
retail space permitting foreign brands to own majority stakes in their local
operation but later retracted under the political pressure.
Even though it is popular to hear M&A in the same breadth, the difference exists between
them:
2. Merger generally takes place with the The arrangement in which the
harmonized conformity of the merging consolidation occurs against the accord
parties mutually agreeing to of the target company in the form of
consolidate their business in the hostile takeover by the acquiring firm,
interest of both the companies thereby known as acquisition.
4. The deal happens between parties of In this case, generally acquiring firm is
equal strength and might in the market. financially strong and bigger than the
target firm.
synergistic output for both the firms in economic downturn assists the firms in
the form of increased operational and tiding over the challenges of downturn
managerial strength, and amplified
profits
1. It provides instant and guaranteed The competition for the licensor company
revenue to the licensor at negligible increases in the market as the same
investment or investment production process is used by the
commitment. competitor for developing the same
product leaving no difference in the
product quality.
2. Promotes brand recognition in the The licensor company faces the increasing
market with the use of its products risk of losing the confidential information
and processes by individual non- of its valuable process knowledge to the
related entities in a market space. market threatening its unique selling
position.
3. The licensor enjoys the access to the The licensor loses the control over the
foreign markets without having to quality and thereby faces an increasing
make any direct investment nor threat to its brand value.
have to incur transportation cost
involved in exporting of products.
the business interest in three countries India, China and Japan where its products are
exported in all these three nations. With passage of time, the firm grows in foreign
market and gathers the knowledge about the characteristics of those markets.
Subsequently, the increase
COMMERCE PAPER NO. 16: FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INSTITUTIONS
requirement exists in that country which turns out to be only India. Armed with proper
PHASE IV:
Establishment of
PHASE III: FDI affiliate
Licensing
PHASE II: Agreement
Establishment of
PHASE I: Exports Sales &
Distribution
Subsidiary/
Affiliate
Though, BRIO must have been attracted by the relative benefit of higher profit vis-à-vis
negligible investment required in the licensing agreement compared to that in FDI, the
demerit in the form of limited control on its quality standards leads to stage IV.
Henceforth, post cancelling the license of fore
upon the acquisition of that firm and establishing its personal wholly owned subsidiary
i.e. opting for the FDI route.
Numerous reasons could have motivated such a decision of heavy direct investment in a
foreign country on the part of BRIO, such as decline in sales, appreciation in defects in
products, thereby customer complaints, or desire to expand its operation and thus market
in the country by offering superior quality products or even tax breaks and other
incentives offered by India.
Therefore, in essence this theory suggests that the expansion into foreign operations is a
gradual process whose first step begins from exporting. And it is not necessary for all the
parent firms having operations in different countries to rigorously follow these stages
from beginning to end. Different stages transpire in different countries for the same
parent firm which is basically a response to the demand of the respective markets (in
foreign countries) and also post-considering the political situation of the respective host
country. The exporting fundamentally provides an opportunity to the parent firm to
acquire all the knowledge about the market, competition and nation cost-effectively
before embarking upon an unfamiliar territory and setting up a business there. Exporting
facilitate the chances of the parent company to survive, succeed and realize the complete
benefit from its high risk investment.
3.4. Product Cycle Theory
The product life cycle states that FDI is a stage in the life cycle of the new product
launched in an oligopolistic market that exploits the product and factor market
imperfections (i.e., factors of production available at lower cost in different countries).
This theory was proposed by Raymond Vernon.
COMMERCE PAPER NO. 16: FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INSTITUTIONS
Foreign Institutional investment is defined as the investment made into the shares of a
firm by the foreign investors having no interest in the management of that firm. It
involves the transaction in highly liquid securities and other financial assets of the firm. It
is in complete contrast to the foreign direct investment which provides the investor with
the managerial control over the company; while FII investor has no controlling say in the
management of the company. It involves the purchase of shares in one or more foreign
companies, generally by the insurance or pension fund houses, without the gain of
controlling stakes in those companies. The equity investors holding less than 10% of
ordinary shares of the company are classified as foreign institutional investor. These
Though the root of both kinds of investments is same being the investment in the foreign
country, there still exists a difference between the two:
2. Investments It involves the purchase of the stock It involves the purchase of shares in
made into of the foreign company to secure a one or more foreign companies,
controlling interest in that generally by the insurance or
company. It also includes the pension fund houses, without the
acquisition of non-financial assets gain of controlling stakes in those
e.g. technology and intellectual companies.
capital.
4. Earnings The earnings of FDI occur in many The dividend earned from their
forms involving dividend, royalties investments in the stock or interest
and direct earnings from on bonds of foreign company forms
subsidiaries. the major source of earning for FII.
5. Liquidity FDI offers lesser liquidity to its These form a highly liquid
holders owing to its nature of investment asset where their sale and
investments in fixed assets which trade is quite easy and convenient.
makes it difficult to sell. And it is because of its high liquidity
Nevertheless, it offers a more stable that these investments are more
earnings option. volatile.
7. Merits The economy benefits from the The benefits attached with the FII
increase in the production, inflow is relatively lower in this
technology and management case. FII increases only the width
transfers, employable skills, and depth of stock exchanges
employment opportunities, revenue resulting in better price discoveries
receipts, standard of living and process for the scrips.
balance of payment.
7. Summary
Foreign Direct Investment or FDI can be defined as the investment made by an entity
residing in one country into an enterprise located in some foreign country.
Joint Venture: It is a strategic alliance between two or more parties (entities or
individuals) coming together to accomplish a joint specific task by pooling their
resources and expertise.
Franchising may be defined as a business arrangement where the firm grants the right or
privilege to another entity to sell its trademarked products and services in a specific
location for a fee.
The product life cycle states that FDI is a stage in the life cycle of the new product
launched in an oligopolistic market that exploits the product and factor market
imperfections
Foreign Institutional investment is defined as the investment made into the shares of a
firm by the foreign investors having no interest in the management of that firm.
Foreign investment is considered to be an important driver of economic growth,
particularly for developing economies as it forms the part of the investible sources
facilitating capital to the host country