Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allt
Allt
and Administration
By
M. Tanko
An Introduction to the Nigerian Tax System and Administration
By
Muhammad Tanko
Department of Accounting,
Ahmadu Bello University Zaria.
2
@ M. Tanko 2003
Ztanko2003@yahoo.com
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, store in a
author.
3
PREFACE
Taxation as a subject although looks simple to the students, seems to have a lot of
complications, as it is a subject that you either pass all or you fail all. This book therefore,
is intended to help students of accounting, at what ever stage to overcome their fears of
accounting and to have the book as companion to ease their understanding of taxation as
a subject.
Muhammad Tanko
A.B.U. Zaria, 2003.
4
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
My most sincere and unalloyed gratitude go to my students of the 2003 academic session
of the Department of Accounting Ahmadu Bello University Zaria. The book was first
envisaged to serve as a course book for the students pursuing degree in accounting. This
scope has now widened to include those writing their professional examinations. To all
and sundry who have contributed to the success of this book, I thank you all.
Muhammad Tanko
A.B.U. Zaria, 2003.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction
6
Chapter 8: Pioneer Companies
8.1 Qualification for Application
8.2 Pioneer Certificate and Production Day
8.3 Tax Relief Period
8.4 Accounting Date
8.5 Computation of Profit for Tax Purposes
8.6 Pioneer Status by Location
7
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
Taxation is viewed by many as governments’ way of extorting money from
people. But the term is more than what many sees it. John, (2000) for example, viewed
taxation as the compulsory payments by individuals and companies to the relevant tax
authorities at all levels of governance. The major issue of importance in the definition of
taxation is its uniqueness as a program embarked upon by government to control the
economy. This is because through taxation many aspects of governance could be
achieved.
There are different forms of taxation; they include progressive tax, proportional
tax and regressive tax.
1. Progressive tax: This is a practice by which the rate of tax increases as the
income or the value of the property to be taxed increases.
2. Proportional tax: A tax is proportional where every person pays according to
the proportion of income he has.
3. Regressive tax: A tax is regressive if the more you have, the less you
contribute, that means the rate of the tax or percentage falls as the income
increases.
What ever forms of tax is levied, there are specific features identified as constituting the
characteristics of a good tax system. They include;
i. equality
ii. certainty
iii. convenience
iv. economy
v. flexibility
vi. buoyancy
vii. simplicity
viii. fairness
The rest of the book is structured into eleven chapters starting with the tax administration.
It is my advice that the students follow the book chapter by chapter.
8
2.6. Body of Appeal Commissioners.
2.7. Other matters in the Nigerian tax administration
The quorum of the board is seven (7) persons and one of whom must be the Chairman or
Director of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).
Specifically, the following are the functions and powers of this committee.
i. It is responsible for the collection of companies’ income tax,
petroleum profit tax and value added tax. It must therefore, do all
such things necessary for the assessment and collection of these
taxes.
ii. It can sue and be sued in its official name
iii. It may acquire, hold or sell any property taken as security for, or,
in satisfaction of any penalty, tax or judgment debt due from an
organization or a company. The board must account for all such
properties or proceeds to the minister of finance.
iv. It may authorize any person within or outside Nigeria to perform
or exercise any of its powers and duties. The person may also
receive any notice or other documents served upon, delivered or
given to the board.
9
v. If the minister consents, the board may appoint the joint tax board
to perform or exercise any of its powers, duties or function.
The functions of the Joint Tax Board include but not limited to:
(1) To settle complains and conflicts between the states' tax authorities.
(2) To consider and approve pension schemes and provident funds.
(3) To advise the Federal Government on double taxation arrangements, rates
of capital allowances and other taxation matters relating to individuals
Under the Nigerian tax system.
(4) To promote uniformity in the application of the personal tax system
throughout the country.
(5) To exercise powers and perform duties relating to companies income tax
which might be delegated to it by the Minister of Finance.
10
2.3 State Board of Internal Revenue
The Finance Decree 1993, formally established a Board of Internal Revenue for each
State of the Federation, whose operational arm is called State Internal Revenue Service.
The quorum of this committee is five (5) members of whom one must be the Chairman or
a Director. The Secretary is to be appointed by the Board from within the State internal
Revenue Service, and shall be an ex-officio member.
11
2. Advice the board on its powers and duties
3. Attend to such other matters that may from time to time
be referred to it.
Their main function includes the responsibility for the assessment and collection of all
taxes, fines and rates under its jurisdiction. It shall also account for all monies so
collected in a manner to be prescribed by the chairman of the local government and they
shall be responsible for the day-to-day running of the local government treasury. The
local government treasury shall be its operational arm.
12
2.6 Body of Appeal Commissioners
2.6.0 Introduction
Every company is required to file a return of its income for tax purposes each year
without notice or demand from the Federal Board of Inland Revenue. The return must be
filed whether or not a company is liable to pay tax.
The tax returns must be filed with the appropriate Area Office of the Board:
(a) Within 3 months of every year of assessment, failing which provisional tax
becomes applicable, especially for tax-payers who are not filing self-assessment
returns.
(b) Not later than 6 months after the close of the company's accounting year for all
corporate tax payers, including those that becomes liable to provisional tax.
(c) Within 18 months from date of commencement of business in the case of newly
incorporated business.
2.6.1 Assessment
The Board may proceed to assess every company chargeable with tax, as soon as
the board deems appropriate, particularly, after the expiration of the time allowed to such
company for the delivery of the audited accounts.
Where a company has delivered audited accounts and return, the Board may:
(a) Accept the audited accounts, returns, and make an assessment accordingly
(b) Refuse to accept the return. This will results to applying the policy of what
we termed as the "best of judgment", determine the amount of the total
profits of the company and make an assessment accordingly
13
Furthermore, the FBIR is empowered to seek and obtain information from the banks
regarding a company chargeable to tax, including the names and addresses of such tax
payers. The bank is not expected to comply with such a request unless the request is
signed by the Chairman of the FBIR.
Notes:
There are basically, three types of Assessments that can be raised on the tax
payer.
1. The original assessment
2. Revised and or amended assessment
3. Additional assessment.
Typically the penalty for late return is N5, 000. The penalty for incorrect returns
is N200 plus double the amount of tax undercharged in consequence of such incorrect
14
return or information (see table 1 for a summary). In cases where no return is filed, the
authorities are authorized to make a best of judgment assessment.
Where the Board and the company come to an agreement as to the amount
assessable, the original assessment made will be amended accordingly and notice of tax
payable served upon such company. However; where there is no agreement the Board
may give notice of refusal to amend the assessment as desired by the company and may
revise the assessment to such amount as the Board may; according to the best of its
judgment determine and then give notice of the revised assessment and the tax payable.
15
At this point, it should be noted that the law requires the following as conditions for a
valid notice of objection:
i. It must have been made in writing, with the grounds of objection and must
be made within the 30 days of the receipt of the assessment.
ii. Upon the receipt of the valid objection, the relevant tax authority will
examine the grounds of objection to determine their validity. Where the
grounds are found to be valid, the tax computation would be reviewed and
a revised or emended assessment raised. Payment would be based on the
revised amendment.
iii. Where the relevant tax authority believes that there is no merit in the
notice of objection, then a notice of refusal to amend would be sent to the
tax payer.
iv. The tax payer, if aggrieved by the notice of refusal to amend, should file a
notice of appeal to the body of appeal commissioners within 30 days of
the receipt of the notice of refusal to amend.
It should be noted here that, where an appeal is to be heard concerning a case in which an
appeal commissioner has an interest either as a shareholder, director, legal adviser,
auditor, tax advisor or in whichever capacity, he should inform the other appeal
commissioners. He will usually be excused from such a meeting.
16
The appointment of persons to this body entails the possession of either of the
following:
i Must be a legal practitioner
ii A chartered accountant
iii A tax practitioner
iv A person experience in business
17
2.6.6 Procedures Following Decision of Appeal Commissioner
The decision of the Appeal Commissioners shall be served by the Board upon the
company or upon the person in whose name such company is chargeable.
A taxpayer who is not satisfied by the decision of the Appeal Commissioners may
appeal to the Federal High Court. Where the decision of the Commissioners involve
payment of tax, which does not, exceeds N400, no further appeal by the company shall
lie from that decision except with the consent of the Board.
The FBIR may also appeal to the Federal High Court if it is dissatisfied with the decision
of the Appeal Commissioners "on point of law".
Appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court lie to the Court of Appeal:
(a) At the instance of the company where the decision of that judge involves
tax payable in excess of N1,000; and
(b) At the instance of or with consent of the Board, in any case.
Where an assessment becomes final and conclusive the tax becomes payable within the
appropriate period prescribed for payment of tax. However, any tax overpaid shall be
repaid.
18
2.6.9 Deposit on Appeal
The Appeal Commissioners or the court may on the hearing of an appeal at the first
instance, order an amount equal to the lesser of:
(a) The tax charged on the appellant in the preceding year of assessment, or
(b) One-half of the tax charged on the assessment under appeal, to be
deposited by the appellant.
This is clearly an advance payment of tax and when the assessment for the year is
finalized the payment is refundable if there is no taxable profit.
A company may file a self-assessment and pay the tax based. The company will pay the
tax on that when delivering its tax return to the tax office. A self-assessment is an
indication that the company has assessed itself on the specified date. The self-assessment
form is signed by a principal officer of the company defined as either, the Managing
Director, an Executive Director or the Company Secretary.
Tax due date for payment is 6 months after the accounting year end. A company has up to
2 months from the due date to settle the assessment.
Self-assessed companies who file their assessments and attach a cheque or draft may on
application be granted concession to pay the remaining tax due in not more than five
monthly installments.
19
iii. Audited financial statement of the company together with the computation of the
tax liability with accompanying schedules and capital allowances computations;
and
iv. Evidence of direct payment of the whole computed tax due or at least the
equivalent of an installment approved by Federal Inland Revenue Service into the
bank designated for the payment of tax
All companies are required to file their tax returns within six (6) months from the end of
their accounting year.
20
Persons affected by these provisions have the rights to object and appeal against the
Board's directives.
Any person answerable under these provisions for the payment of tax on behalf of
a company is indemnified against any person whatsoever for all payments made by him
as tax of the company
An annual return must be filed within either of the two time limits stated below:
For a new company, within 18 months from the date of commencement or within 6
months after account is prepared whichever is earlier. While for an existing company, it
has to be filed within 6 months from the year end.
The penalty for late submission or not submission at all, involves the following
1. The payment of an amount of N2, 500 every month
2. Where the failure to filed return continues, the payment of N500 every month
Various penalties are prescribed by the tax law for non-fulfillment of statutory
duties by persons assessable, whether with intent to defraud or through carelessness. The
following is a summary of the penalty provisions now in force.
21
Table 1: Penalty Provision for tax related offences
S/n Offence Penalty
8 Failure to pay over withholding tax deducted or N5,000 fine plus amount of
failure to deduct tax deducted plus interest
Source: Tax Returns
Evasion must not be confused with legal avoidance. Avoidance of tax is legal
while tax evasion is illegal and criminal. With respect to tax avoidance a judge of the
British Court had said "No man in this Country is under the smallest obligation, oral or
otherwise, so to arrange his legal relations to his business or to his property as to enable
the Inland Revenue put the large possible shovel into his stores. The Inland Revenue is
not slow-and quite rightly to take every advantage, which is open to it under the taxing
statues for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer's pocket. And the taxpayer is in like
manner entitled to be astute to prevent as far as he honestly can, the depletion of his
means by the Revenue" - Lord Dyde.
22
So, tax avoidance embraces honest means taken by the tax-payer to mitigate his
tax liability. Such means may include, for example, not distributing profit in order to
avoid paying withholding. Tax evasion on the other hand, is refusal to pay tax or submit
returns, filing of incorrect or false returns, etc.
The relevant tax authority either under the provisions of the companies income
tax act of 1990 or the personal income tax decree of 1993, may from time to time and as
long as it wishes carry out a back duty audit on a tax payer.
Where a company does not pay its tax within the stipulated period, it shall be
subject to a penalty equal to 10 percent of the tax payable provided the penalty is served
on the company by Demand Note.
With effect from 1st January 1991, Unpaid tax attracts interest at the base lending
rate from the date the tax becomes payable until it is paid. Base lending rate is the
weighted average of the cost of funds to any bank.
23
Where the objection or appeal is determined the Board is required to serve upon the
company notice of the tax payable as finalized or agreed and the tax then becomes
payable within one month of the notice.
(a) If that company has a fixed base of business in Nigeria, the Board may
assess and charge on such fair and reasonable percentage of that part of
the turnover attributable to that fixed base.
(c) If that company executes one single contract involving survey deliveries,
installation or construction, assess and charge the tax for that year of
assessment on such a fair and reasonable percentage of that turnover of the
contract.
(d) If the trade or business is between the company and another person
controlled by it or which has controlling interest in it and conditions are
imposed or made between the company and such person in their
commercial or financial relations which in the opinion of the Board is
deemed to be artificial and fictitious, assess and charge on a fair and
reasonable percentage of that part of the turnover as may be determined by
the Board.
Note that the "Board" as used here refers to the Federal Board of Inland Revenue.
24
Assets so seized shall initially be held for 14 days after which if settlement of the
tax is not made, such assets can be disposed off except in the case of immovable
property, where disposal can be done only on the order of the High Court.
The general practices in the process of exercising the power of distrain can be
briefly summarized as follows:
a. Where the relevant tax authority wishes to exercise the power of restrain,
an application made to a high court to obtain a warrant. The warrant is a sufficient
authority to levy by distressing the amount of tax being owed.
b. Upon the warrant being obtained the authority is exercised by any officer
authorized in writing by the board.
c. The function is carried out by breaking open any building or place, if he so
wish he calls to his assistance any police officer. It shall be the duty of the police officer
to aid and assist in the execution of the warrant of distress and in levying such distress,
when so required.
d. The items detrained may be kept for a period of fourteen days at the cost
of the taxpayer after which they may be sold in the event that the tax due is not paid. No
immovable property may be sold without an order of a high court.
e. The sales proceed is applied in meeting of the incidental cost of keeping
and selling the items detrained and the payment of the tax, penalty and interest owed. If
there is any balance it shall be paid to the tax payer upon a demand from him, but
provided the request is made within one year of the date of sale.
In the event of a dispute between two state tax authorities as to the territory of residence
of an individual, or between an individual and a state tax authority, the facts may be
referred to the Joint Tax Board by the tax authority, which is a party to the dispute.
The Secretary of the Board is obliged to give at least 30 days notice to the parties of the
hearing of the appeal. The Board may require further information from any of the parties,
and at the expiration of the notice period, proceed to determine the appeal. Written
notice of the decision of the Board must be given to the parties and the decision of the
Board is binding on the parties and on any appeal tribunal.
Appeals lie from the decision of the Board to the High Court of the State and from there
to the Supreme Court. At this point, we observe that the Appeal Court has been omitted.
25
For now we could not say the reason why the omission, but it might be because the
Appeal Court did not exist when the ITMA 1961 was passed, and this part of the law has
not been amended. Following the normal legal procedures, an appeal should go to the
Appeal Court before the Supreme Court.
Where a tax authority discovers that an assessment has been made on an individual
resident in another state, the assessment shall be discharged and the tax already paid shall
be:
(1) Set-off against tax owing for any other year by the individual to the said
tax authority, or
(2) Paid to the state of the other territory, or
(3) Repaid to the individual.
It should be noted that where a taxpayer has fully charged his tax liability but has failed
to remit any tax deducted to the appropriate tax authority, no tax clearance certificate
would be issued. Furthermore, where a non-resident earns dividend and interest from
which withholding tax has been deducted at source, he is not required to have a tax
clearance certificate for the tax. It will be assumed that tax deducted by the payer has
been remitted to the appropriate tax authorities for the purposes of remitting his earnings
to his country of residence.
The Tax clearance certificate shall disclosed the following information in respect of the
last three years of assessment.
a. Total profits or chargeable income.
b. Tax payable
c. Tax paid
d. Tax outstanding or statement that no tax is due.
TCC for the last 3 years is required of every company and individuals before the
following transactions could be processed.
(1) Application for government loan for industry or business
(2) Registration of Motor Vehicles
(3) Application for Firearms Licence
(4) Application for foreign exchange (foreign money) or for permission to remit
funds outside Nigeria.
(5) Application for Certificate of occupancy
(6) Application for award of Contracts by government and its agencies and registered
Companies.
26
(7) Application for trade licence
(8) Application for approved building plans
(9) Application for transfer of real property
(10) Application for import or export license
(11) Application for plot of Land
(12) Application for buying agent license
(13) Application for pools or gaming license
(14) Application for registration as a Contractor
(15) Application for distributorship
(16) Stamping of guarantor's form for Nigerian Passport
(17) Application for registration of a Limited liability Company or of a business
name and.
(18) Application for allocation of market stalls.
27
8. Roads Taxes.
9. Business premises and registration levy
i. Urban areas as defined by each state - maximum of N10, 000 for registration
and N50, 000 renewals per annum.
28
CHAPTER THREE
BASIS PERIODS
It should be observed from the above that, all the terminal dates for the basis periods are
before January 1 of the years under review. For example, the basis periods ended before
January 1, 1995 in respect of 1995 tax year. Examples of tax liabilities that will arise on
the proceeding year basis period include the taxation of companies, taxation of sole
traders, partnership assessment e.t.c.
29
(b) The basis period must have commenced the day after the end of the previous
one i.e. there must be continuity
(c) There must be only one permanent year-end i.e. there must be consistency
It is important to stress here that a normal basis period is obtained for businesses in
continuous operation i.e. an old company that has not changed its accounting date, and
which is not ceasing operation. For example, if we consider a business whose permanent
year-end is December 31 every year, the basis period for assessable profit for 1995 to
1997 shall be as follows:
Year 2 from the date of commencement up to the end of the first twelve months i.e. the
accounts for the first one year.
The basis period for assessable profit of the second tax year would be repeated in the
third tax year under the following conditions:
30
(a) Where the month of commencement of business arises on the calendar after
the month chosen as the year-end, it would be impracticable to have a correct
preceding year basis period. For example, if the date of commencement of
business is October 1 1994, and the permanent year end of the business is
march 31 every year, then the correct basis period for assessable profit for the
relevant years of assessment would be as follows:
Observe that the basis period commencing from April 1 994 and terminating on March 31
1995 is correct preceding year basis period, but the business had not started by April 1
1994 hence the need to repeat the basis period of the second tax year in the third tax year.
(b) Where the first accounts prepared by the new business is for a period that is in
excess of twelve months. On this particular instance, it may in fact be possible
to obtain a correct preceding year basis period but it would be wrong in
principle to do so. For example, if the date of commencement is June 1, 1995
and the first account is up to December 31, 1996 there will need to be a
repetition of the basis period of the second tax year in the third tax year as
follows:
31
Illustration
Adanda Ltd commenced business on 1st April 2002, show the basis period for capital
allowances.
Solution
Adanda ltd
Normal basis
Year Basis period
2002 1/4/02 - 31/12/02 - 9 months
2003 1/4/02 - 31/3/03 - 12 months
2004 1/4/02 - 31/3/03 - preceding year.
The period 1/4/02, 31/12/02 is common to 2002 and 2003 years of assessment (that is
Over lapped), hence assets bought during this period will claim initial allowance only in
2002. Further since the basis period for 2002 is 9 months, the annual allowance for that
year will be 9 x annual allowance rate.
12
The basis periods for 2003 and 2004 coincide, hence assets purchased during this period
would claim initial allowance in 2003 only However, since assets purchased during
1/4/02 to 31/12/02 have already claimed initial allowance in 2002 year of assessment
only assets bought in the remaining period 1/1/03 to 31/3/03 will claim initial allowance
in 2003 year of assessment. Full annual allowance will be granted in 2003 and 2004 years
of assessment.
Illustration
Amanga Ltd. used to make up its accounts to 31st March. In 2000 the accounting year
end was changed to 31st December. Show how the fixed assets purchased during the
period
1998 and 1999 should be treated for capital allowance purposes.
Solution
Amanga ltd.
The affected years of assessment are 2000, 2001 and 2002. If the Board bases the
assessment of these years on the new accounting period, the basis periods would be:
32
But the basis period of 1999 is 1/4/97 - 31/3/98. Thus we find there is a gap of 9 months
from the end of basis period of 1999 and beginning of basis period for 2000. Therefore
assets purchased during this period 1/4/98 - 31/12/98 will claim initial allowance in 2000.
Thus assets purchased between 1/4/98 - 31/12/99 (21 months) will claim capital
allowances in 2000.
Now if the Board takes the alternative basis of adopting the old accounting date for those
three years of assessment, the basis periods would be:-
But the basis period of 2003 is 1/1/02 - 31/12/02. Thus we still see that there is a gap
between the end of 2002 basis period and the beginning of the basis period for 2003 (1st
April 2001 - 31st December 2001), a period of 9 months. Assets purchased during this
period will be deemed to have been purchased in 2003 basis period for the purpose of
initial allowance. In other words, that gap is regarded as being part of 2003 basis period.
Where a taxpayer has changed its accounting year end, it is the responsibility of the tax
authority to determine the basis upon which tax liability will be computed. The general
practice of the tax authority is to take the following steps
Step 1: Identify the year when the business changes its accounting date first, this
means the date when the company failed to prepare accounts to the old
year end. This represents the first tax year under the commencement rule.
Step 2: Determine the two subsequent tax years
Step 3: Determine the basis period for assessable profit and the corresponding
assessable profit on the proceeding year basis using the old year end for
33
the three years identified in step one and two above. Sum up the assessable
profit for the three tax years
Step 4: Repeat step three above using the New Year end.
The basis upon which the revenue board will assess the tax payer shall be on the higher
of the assessable profits obtained in steps three and four
The significance of this is that a tax payer has no say in determining the basis of
assessment where there is a change in date.
In solving a problem involving the change in accounting date, the key issue is the proper
identification of the year of change. Indeed if all the other basic principles are well
understood but the year of change is wrongly identified, the solution proposed will still
be wrong.
Consequently, in properly identifying the year of change one should be guided by the
principle of continuity under the conditions for a correct preceding year basis period.
(a) Compute assessment for the 3 years referred to, based on 12 months
ending on the original accounting date and total up. The apportionment
should be done on a pro-rata basis.
(b) Compute the assessments alternatively based on 12 months ending on the
new accounting date also on pro-rata basis and total up.
Illustration
Assume that Anga limited, Manga limited and Banga limited have presented the
following information from which you are required to identify the correct year of change.
Anga limited
Manga limited
Year ended 31/10/90
Year ended 31/10/91
Year ended 31/10/92
34
Period ended 31/3/93
Year ended 31/3/94
Banga limited
Year ended 31/12/90
Year ended 31/12/91
Period ended 30/4/93
Year ended 30/4/94
Year ended 31/4/95
Solution
Anga limited
Using the consistency rule, it is expected that after 30/6/91, the next account should be
prepared to 31/6/92 but the next account was for the period ended 31/12/91.
Consequently, the company has failed to prepare its account to 31/6/92 so that the year of
change is taken to be 1992 tax year. The two subsequent tax years shall be 1993 and 1994
years of assessment.
Manga limited
Following the principle discussed earlier, the above named company can be seen to have
failed to prepare accounts to 31/10/93. consequently the year of change is 1993 tax year
while the two subsequent tax years shall be 1994 and 1995 years of assessment.
Banga limited
The year of change is 1992 tax year because the account was not made up to year ended
31/12/92.
If we take anga limited as an example, the basis periods for assessable profit
under the change in accounting date rule can be summarize as follows
Illustration
Madaka Ltd has been making up its account to 31st March of every year. The directors
on 1st April 1999 decided to change the accounting year-end to 31st December to
conform to the Government fiscal year. The adjusted profits of the company for some
years are given below:
N
Year ended 31st March 1998 8,000
Year ended 31st March 1999 12,000
35
9 months ended 31st December 1999 10,000
Year ended 31st December 2000 15,000
Year ended 31st December 2001 18,000
Solution
Madaka ltd
The affected years of assessment are 1999, 2000 and 2001. We start we the computation
of the tax liability base on the old accounting date. This is simple, we just continue as if
no change of date has occurred. For example, in 1999 the profit of 1998 will be taxed.
Likewise in 2000, but there after you notice that the company produce the account up to
December of the same year, therefore when we are taxing the company for 2001 we take
the profit from the last date of 1999 to the December, which is 9 months and add 3
months profit from the subsequent profit. This is give below;
Assessable Profit
Year N
1999 12 months to 31/3/98 8,000
2000 12 months to 31/3/99 12,000
2001 12 months to 31/3/2000 10,000+ 3 x 15,000 13,750
12 33,750
Now, we compute the tax liability based on the new accounting date. Simple knowledge
of arithmetic may be needed here. In 1999, we only have 3 months for 1998 and the 9
months balance will come from the 1999 profit. We compute thus;
The assessable profits would be based on the taxable income that is higher among the two
as it is the tax authority that has the option to take the income that will produce a higher
tax.
36
Year Profit
N
1999 11,000
2000 13,000
2001 15,000
39,000
(i) Year of Cessation - the actual profit of the year, that is, from 1st January
to date of cessation.
(ii) In the year preceding cessation (penultimate year), the higher of the profit
as assessed on the normal basis and the actual profit of the year.
This means revising the assessment of the penultimate year as it would have been
assessed on the normal preceding year basis.
Penultimate tax year: The basis period for assessable profit for the penultimate tax year is
on the preceding year basis.
Ultimate tax year: this is the year of cassation. The basis period for assessable profit is
from the beginning of government tax year usually 1st January up to the date of cessation.
Illustration
Adams limited decided to fold up its operations with effect from 31st march 1999 as a
result of difficulty in getting enough contracts.
Using the information below, you are required to determine the basis of assessing the
company;
37
Solution
Adams limited
Basis period for assessable profit under the cassation rule
Workings
1998 1/1/98-31/10/98 10/12 X 180,000 = 150,000
1/11/98-31/12/98 2/5 X 150,000 = 60,000
210,000
Conclusively, we see that the company would be assessed on the basis of the original
assessment in the penultimate tax year. This is because this assessment results in a higher
tax liability.
Illustration
Nasir Ltd which has been trading for many years ceased trading on 30th October, 2001.
The accounts for the three years preceding cessation showed the following profits:
N
January - December 1999 18,000
January - December 2000 25,000
January - October 2001 (10 months) 30,000
Year Profit
N
2000 18,000
2001 25,000
2002 profit of 2001 if business had not ceased.
The revised assessment would be:
Assessable
Year Profit
N
2001 Actual (10 months) 30,000
2000 Higher of N18, 000 (1999)
or Actual N25,000 (2000) 25,000
38
Illustration
Saidu Ltd ceased trading on 31st March 2002. Its accounts showed the following profits:
N
1st April 1993 - 31st March 2000 12,000
1st April 1994 - 31st March 2001 25,000
1st April 1995 - 31st March 2002 30,000
Assessable
Year Profit
2002 Actual: January - March 2002 3_ x 30,000 = N7,500
12
Under the cessation rule, the tax authority may exercise its right of election by
determining whether it should assess the tax payer in the penultimate tax year on actual
year basis. The general rule is that the tax authority will exercise this right only if it will
increase the tax exposure of the tax payer
Where after the date of permanent cessation, the company or its liquidators receive or pay
any sum which would have been included or deducted in computing adjusted profit if it
39
had been received prior to that date, such shall be deemed for the purpose of tax to have
been received or paid on the last day before such cessation occurred.
Illustration
Nabamu limited closed its business with effect from 31st may, 1999. The company had
made a profit of:
The liquidator of the company received the sum of 4,000 from the disposal of some
obsolete stocks written off during the year ended 31st December 1996 sometimes in
October 1999 and N3, 000 was collected in December 1999 from a debtor previously
considered bad.
Solution
Determination of assessable profit for the relevant tax year
Tax year basis period assessable profit basis period assessable profit
1998 1/1/97-31/12/97 N48,000 1/1/98-31/12/98 N54,000
1999 1/1/99-31/5/99 N17,000
Notes
1999 assessable profit
1/1/99-31/5/99 10,000
Receipts on disposal of stock 4,000
Bad debt recovered 3,000
17,000
The income from the disposal of stock and bad debts are deemed to have arisen after the
date of cassation.
40
3.5 Standard Income Tax Rate
With effect from 1993 year of assessment the standard income tax rate to be
applied on the taxable profit of a company is 35 kobo per Naira or 35 percent. Although,
this will be discussed further in our discussion of company income tax.
For a Nigerian Company which has newly commenced business and is engaged in
manufacturing or agricultural production or mining of solid minerals, and turnover for the
first 3 years does not exceed N500,000 p.a. the tax rate is 20% of the total profits. This
concessionary tax applies to such a company which commenced business before 1st
January 1988 for assessment years 1988, 1989 and 1990. The sectors of business referred
to are called "preferred Sectors" and such a company may have the concession extended
for another 2 years if it shows evidence of good records and management.
Exercises
1. Bamko Ltd has been making up its account to 31st March of every year. The
directors on 1st April 1999 decided to change the accounting year-end to 31st December
to conform to the Government fiscal year. The adjusted profits of the company for some
years are given below:
N
Year ended 31st March 1998 10,000
Year ended 31st March 1999 14,000
9 months ended 31st December 1999 12,000
Year ended 31st December 2000 16,000
Year ended 31st December 2001 20,000
2. Akanda limited decided to fold up its operations with effect from 31 st march 1999
as a result of difficulty in getting enough contracts.
3. Nadabo limited closed its business with effect from 31st may, 1999. The company
had made a profit of:
41
N26, 000 for the year ended December 1997,
N45, 000 for the year ended December 1998
N22, 000 for the period ended May 1999
The liquidator of the company received the sum of 6,000 from the disposal of some
obsolete stocks written off during the year ended 31st December 1996 sometimes in
October 1999 and N5, 000 was collected in December 1999 from a debtor previously
considered bad.
You are required to determine the assessable profit for the relevant years of assessment.
42
CHAPTER FOUR
CAPITAL ALLOWANCES
4.1 Introductions
(1) The qualifying capital expenditure must be owned by the taxpayer making
the claim as at the end of the basis period.
(2) The expenditure incurred must be wholly exclusively necessarily and
reasonably for the purpose of the trade or business.
(3) The asset must be used for the purpose of the trade or business whose
profit is assessable to tax.
(4) The company must be the owner of the asset.
(5) Where the value of the qualifying capital expenditures is not less than
N500, 000 an acceptance certificate must be obtained from the
inspectorate division of the federal ministry of industry
43
(c) on the construction of any works or buildings which are likely to
be of little or no value when the source is no longer worked, or
where the source is worked under a concession,, which arc likely
to become valueless when the concession comes to an end to the
company working the source immediately before the concession
comes to an end.
(6) Furniture and fittings (excluding soft furnishings e.g. curtains).
(7) Motor vehicles
(8) Ranching (i.e. animal husbandry) e.g. poultry, cattle rearing, and fish.
(9) Housing estate.
(10) Research and Development expenditures.
(11) Qualifying public transportation (inter-city) new mass transit coach
expenditure incurred on new mass transit coach of 25 seats and above,
operated by a recognized corporate private establishment.
Where the asset is acquired second hand, the qualifying capital expenditures will depend
on the class of the assets.
In respect of buildings acquired second-hand
a. No initial allowance can be claimed
b. The annual allowance to be claimed must be based on the
lower of the original cost of acquisition and the new
purchase price.
Take for instance, if Ikomo Limited purchased a building from Nabamu Limited for the
cost of N1, 050,000.00 second hand, and it can be shown that original cost to Nabamu
Limited was N620, 000.00 then the annual allowance to be claimed by Ikomo Limited
shall be based on the N620, 000.00 instead of the N1, 050,000.00 paid as consideration.
No initial allowance can be claimed.
It may be stressed that this condition will hold true only where the building acquired
second-hand was being previously used for business. Where the building was being
previously put into private use or where it has not been previously put into use at all, it
should be possible to claim both initial and annual allowances.
There is no clear cut provisions in the tax laws as to the treatment of other assets acquired
second-hand as the only provision in the law is in respect of buildings. Consequently,
where other assets are acquired on second-hand, both initial and annual allowances can
be claimed provided they are transactions at arms-length. But where transactions are
between two related parties, then
44
assume that the assets which has a four year tax life has been in use for the two years
before the transaction, then the annual allowance to be claimed shall be N500,000
because the annual allowance shall be based on the un-expired two year life of the motor
vehicle.
Others 50 25
Furniture & Fittings 25 20
Motor Vehicles:
Public transportation 95 Nil
Others 50 25
Plantation Equipment 95 Nil
Housing Estate 50 25
Ranching and Plantation 30 50
Research and Development 95 Nil
Acquisition of assets is matched with the basis period. An asset attracts capital
allowance when incurred in the basis period; assets not acquired within the basis period
of a year of assessment will be excluded from capital allowance computation of that year.
For example, if the basis period for 1997 year of assessment is 1st January - 31st
December 1996, then only assets bought within this period will be granted capital
allowances in 1997 year of assessment. This applies basically for the first year
allowances because thereafter, so long as the asset remains in use at the end of
subsequent basis period, it will be attracting the annual allowance.
45
4.2.1 INITIAL ALLOWANCE
Initial allowance is granted when the asset is first used for the purpose of the trade
or business and no more. In other words, it is granted once only and on an asset. The
applicable percentage is applied on the cost of the asset to arrive at the initial allowance.
It can be called "first-year-allowance" since it is given only in the first year of asset
ownership. The only condition under which initial allowance may not be fully claimed is
where there has been an element of private use.
(1) In the first year by applying the relevant percentage on the cost of the
asset less the initial allowance,
This straight-line method means that the tax laws have implicitly fixed the life span of the
asset. Therefore, the capital allowance computation would be for:
Where the number of months in the basis period for assessable profit is less than
twelve months. The annual allowance to be claimed must be appropriated in
accordance with the number of months in the basis period for assessable profit as
follows:
Annual allowance = cost - initial allowance X Y
N 12
46
Where Y = number of months in the basis period for assessable profit.
The above formula would be used in the first year under the commencement rule and
the ultimate tax year under the cessation rule because it is only under this condition
that the number of months in the basis period for assessable profit can be less than
twelve months.
In the second tax year, under the commencement rule, there would be the need to re-
compute the annual allowance claimable. This is because there is the need to ensure
that the tax written down value as at the beginning of the second tax year must be
written off equally over the remaining life of the asset as follows:
These are impossible propositions in practice as it means that the estimated tax life of the
qualifying capital expenditure has either been reached or that it has been exceeded. Under
any of these situation, the general practice is to assume that the quantity N – X = 1. this
will require that the tax written down value brought forward is claimed fully in that year
as the annual allowance only retaining the mandatory residual value of N10 per asset or
an amount equivalent to 5% of the cost of the asset.
The major condition under which the scenario painted above is obtained is where there is
a change in the rate as we observed between 1995 and 1996 year of assessment. For
example, the rate for plant, which used to be 20% initial allowance and 10% annual
allowance rate, signifying an estimated tax life of 10 years was suddenly reviewed to
50% initial allowance and 25% annual allowance rates, signifying an estimated tax life of
47
4 years. The position is clearer if we imagine a situation where the plant has been in use
for 6 years before 1996 year of assessment.
As an illustration let's assume that a qualifying expenditure was incurred on 1st January
1985 on Motor Vehicles for N200, 000. The capital allowance computation would be:
N
Year Cost, 1st January 1985 200,000
1986 Initial Allowance 25% 40,000
160,000
Annual Allowance 20% 32,000
Residue or written-down value 128,000
1987 Annual Allowance 32,000
W.D.V 96,000
1988 Annual Allowance 32,000
W.D.V 64,000
1989 Annual Allowance 32,000
W.D.V 32,000
1990 Annual Allowance 32,000
W.D.V 0
So we see that the asset has been written off in 5 years because the straight-line
depreciation rate is 20% (100/20), therefore when the annual allowance is 10% the asset
will be written off in 10 years and when it is 12.5% the asset will be written off in 8
years.
The implication of the above is that an asset could be written off for tax purposes whereas
the company could still be using the asset to earn profit. To avoid this situation,, the tax
law has provided that the annual allowance is to be granted to ensure that at least N10
(ten naira) residue must remain for each asset until it is sold or otherwise disposed of by
the company. For this to be done in the above illustration the annual allowance for year 5
must be less N10, that is, N31, 990 to enable the written-down value of the asset to be
N10 if the asset has not been disposed of. This apparently means that if the company
continues to use the asset after the fifth year, no more annual allowance would be granted
because the asset has been written off for tax purposes.
When an asset is sold and its tax written-down-value is less than the proceeds of sale the
difference is given as "Balancing allowance". The intention of the tax law is to ensure
that the total capital allowances claimed equals the cost of the assets over its life as
determined by the annual allowance rate and no more. The tax-payer will not be allowed
to claim capital allowances in excess of the cost of the asset over its life, therefore, where
48
the proceeds of sale exceeds the tax written-down value of the asset a "Balancing charge"
arises (literally representing "profit" on disposal) and is added to the adjusted profit or
deducted from the sum of the capital allowances. The Balancing charge however, cannot
be made to exceed the total amount of capital allowances granted.
Illustration
Consider the following information for magama traders in respect of some assets
disposed.
a. land and building purchased for N750,000 in 1990 and with tax written down
value of N348,750 was disposed off for 1, 250,000
b. motor vehicle with a tax written down value of N259,650 was disposed off for
N500,000 the original cost was N650,000
c. a set of office furniture and equipment was sold for N150,000. it originally
cost the company N300,000 and the tax written down value at the time of
disposal was N179,500.
Solution
The balancing adjustment would be obtained by deducting the tax written down value
from the sales proceeds on disposals
land building motor vehicle furniture
Sale proceeds 1,250,000 500,000 150,000
Less
Tax written down value 348,750 259,650 179,500
Balancing charge 901,250 240,350
Balancing allowance 29,500
the balancing charge for the land and building would be limited to 401, 250 (750,000 –
348,750) which represents the maximum capital allowance already claimed on the
qualifying capital expenditure as at the time of disposal.
There will be no limit on the amount taxable for the motor vehicle because the amount
N240,350 does not exceed the capital allowance already claimed on the asset of 390,350
(650,000-259,650)
Prior to that date the allowance was available only to plant and equipment used in
agricultural production which was defined to exclude marketing and processing.
It is given once like the initial allowance on the first year and is in addition to the initial
allowance. However, investment allowance is not to be taken into account in determining
49
the written down value of the asset, and may for this reason not be "Capital Allowance"
in the strict sense. Investment allowance in Nigeria has the following key features:
The investment allowances that are currently available under the Nigerian tax system are:
i. 10% investments allowance is available on production machine in use by
manufacturing concerns
ii. 10% investments allowance is available on plant and machinery of business in
the agricultural sector of the economy.
iii. 15% investments allowance is available on plant and machinery acquired in
replacement for obsolete ones.
iv. 25% investments tax credit on the assets of companies engaged in the local
fabrication of small tools and machinery.
v. 15% investments allowance can also be claimed by a tax payer who uses the
locally fabricated small tools and machines.
vi. Rural investments allowance from 1992.
The facilities provided by the company must be for the purpose of its trade or business
which is located at least 20 kilometers away from such facilities provided by the
government.
50
forward if assessable profit is not enough to cover them. As an investment allowance,
RIA is not reckoned in finding the written down value of the asset.
The rates of Rural Investment Allowance are:
(1) No facilities at all by government 100% of the expenditure.
(2) No electricity by government 50% of the expenditure
(3) No water by government 30% of the expenditure
(4) No tarred road by government 15% of the expenditure
(5) No telephone by government 5% of the expenditure.
Illustration
Consider kaduna business enterprise that has reported an adjusted profit of N5, 700,000
but has capital allowances claimable of N6, 000,000. You are required to compute the tax
payable at 30% assuming
a. kaduna business enterprise is an agricultural company
b. kaduna business enterprise is a trading company
Solution
kaduna business enterprise
51
It is important to observe that the restriction is based on the assessable profit. Also note
that where there has been a relief of losses, the restriction will then have to be limited to
the remainder of the assessable profit after giving effect to the losses being relieved.
It should also be noted that at the point of cessation of business, there may be some
unutilized capital allowance which can no longer be carried forward the position of the
law is that where this occurs, such unutilized capital allowances may be carried backward
for a maximum period of 5 tax year before the year of cessation.
Where this occurs, the unutilized capital allowance is to be used in reducing the taxable
profits of those years, if any. Where the taxable profits have been reduced, then any taxes
that must have been paid during the year should be refunded, if already paid. where they
are yet to be paid, then the liabilities are extinguished. If after the five years there are still
unutilized capital allowances, then such are said to be terminal and will permanently
become lost.
Illustration
Mamser Ltd has been in trading business for a number of years. The profits as adjusted
for tax purposes for the last 5 years are:
Accounting period N
1st Jan - 31st Dec 1998 200,000
1st Jan-31st Dec 1999 500,000
1st Jan - 31st Dec 2000 800,000
1st Jan-31st Dec 2001 100,000
Solution
52
1999
(Basis period) Cost. 30/9/98 100,000
(1/1/98-31/12/98) Cast, 30/12/98 100,000
200,000
(Basis period)
(1/1/2000-31/12/2000 Investment Allowance 10% 1,000 1,000
Initial Allowance
50% of N10,000 5,000
Annual Allowance -
Old asset 25,000
New asset
(25% x 10,000-5,000) 1,000 31,000 31,000
WD.V 29,000 32,000
2002
(Basis period) Annual Allowance
(1/1/2001- 31/12/2001) lst asset 24,990
2nd asset 1,000 25,990 25,990
W.D.V 3,010
53
WD.V 38,250 57,375 29,375
2001
Addition 30/11/2000 20,000
77,375
Initial Allowance 15% 3,000
Annual Allowance:
Old Asset 4,250 6,375
New Asset 1,700
(10% x 20,000-3,000) 11,075 15,325
Motor Vehicles
2000
Cost, 1/4/99 N 200,000
Initial Allowance, 50% 100,000 100,000
100.000
Annual Allowance, 25% 25,000 25,000
WD.V 75,000 125,000
54
Income Tax Assessment 1999
N
N
Adjusted Profit, 1998 200,000
Example
Basis & Co. Ltd is an old established company and makes up its accounts to 31st
December. The capital allowance computation for 2001 fiscal year showed the following
written-down values:
N
Factory Building 300,000
Leasehold properties 50,000
Plant and Machinery 200,000
55
Additions to fixed assets at 31st December, 2001 were:
N
Factory Building 100,000
Plant and Machinery 120,000
One of the plant and machineries purchased in March 2000 for N10,000 was sold for
N15,000 in December 2001 You are also informed that capital allowances had been
claimed for the assets up to 2001 fiscal year as follows: -,
Factory Building 5 years
Leasehold Properties 4 years
Plant and Machinery 2 years
You are required to show the capital allowance computations for 2002 year of assessment
Notes
(i) Since the tax life of the assets as computed from inverting the annual allowance
rates are 10 years for each of the three classes of assets, the remaining period to
write off the brought forward residue are:
(ii) In respect of the plant and machinery sold, the computation of capital allowance
should commence from the beginning, since the year of purchase has been given,
so as to know the written down value at 2001 fiscal year. This value is included in
the WD.V of N200,000 and should therefore be excluded. In other words, the
capital allowances for the asset sold should be computed separately from the rest.
Since the capital allowances claimed is less than the amount of Balancing charge, the
56
Balancing charge is restricted to the amount of Capital allowance claimed, that is N6,250,
excluding investment allowance.
Capital Allowances
Initial (15%, 50%) (15,000) (60,000)
Annual:
Old (60,000) (8,333) (98,125)
New (8,500) --- (15,000)
W.D.V 31/12/2001 316,500 41,667 143,125
57
In other words, when a qualifying capital expenditure is acquired through payment by
installment, only the principal portion of the payment is to be utilized in the computation
of capital allowances and the hire purchase interest is to be treated as an allowable
expense for tax purposes. Consequently, upon the above, it is important as an allowable
expense for tax purpose element in every installment and excludes it prior to the
computation of capital allowance. The peculiar characteristics of a hire purchase
transaction is the fact that every deposit and installment is to be considered for capital
allowance computation purpose, as an addition to qualifying capital expenditure with the
effect that both initial and annual allowances have to be computed on each. There are
several issues that have to be taken note of
1. Where there are several installments paid during the course of a particular
year of assessment, it is often advisable that all installment falling into a
particular basis period for capital allowance should be aggregated and
considered as payment for that particular year of assessment represented by
the basis period.
2. The change of the basis of annual allowance computation from the reducing
balance basis to the straight line basis from 1987 year of assessment meant
that for each qualifying capital expenditure, a maximum tax life has been
defined. If this is true, it will mean that for a specific asset acquired in a
particular tax year, there is a defined number of years for which the asset
should be represented in the tax records after which it is only the residual
value of N10 per asset that should be obtained. If the principle highlighted
above were to be strictly applied, then there is the likelihood of extending the
estimated tax life of the qualifying capital expenditure. This possible problem
would be solved by ensuring that the denominator used for computing annual
allowance after the first tax year of use is progressively reduced by one every
time there is a new installment.
3. As a follow-up to the point made above is the possibility of deducting N10 per
item from more items than are actually in existence. This problem is solved by
ensuring that the N10 per item is deducted only from the last installment.
Illustration
Amaka limited normally acquire its machinery on hire purchase. On 1st September, 1993
it entered into a hire purchase agreement with ankaka limited. Ten of the machines are to
be acquired with N2,000,000 paid as initial deposit on that date. This is to be followed by
twenty four equal installments of N200,000 commencing from 30th November 1993. it
was reported that if cash were to be paid immediately, only N5,600,000 would have been
required. Amaka limited normally prepare its accounts to 30th June every year and it is
not expected to have a change in date in the next four years.
You are required to compute the capital allowances up to end of 1998 year of assessment.
58
Solution
Computation of capital allowances for 1995 to 1998 tax years
Workings
1. principal for capital allowance
Deposit 2,000,000
Installments 24X200,000 4,800,000
Hire purchase price 6,800,000
Cash price 5,600,000
Hire purchase interest 1,200,000
Number of installments 24
Interest per installment 50,000
Principal 150,000
2. Scheduled of payment
Tax year basis period no of installments amount
1995 1/7/93-30/6/94 8 1,200,000
Deposit 2,000,000
3,200,000
1996 1/7/94-30/6/95 12 1,800,000
1997 1/7/95-30/6/96 4 600,000
59
= N256,000
= N300, 000
AA = 2,304,000
4-1
= N768, 000
annual allowance
AA = 600,000-300,000
4-2
6. In 1998, it is apparent that this is the last tax year of the asset. Consequently there
is the need to retain the mandatory N10 per asset. Since there are ten of the assets. The
sum of N100 must be retained hence the claim of N149,900 instead of the expected
N150,000 from the last installment. Observe that for the installments of 1995 through
1997, they were fully claimed in the last year.
60
Example
Dongoyaro Nigeria Ltd which makes up accounts to 30th June each year purchased a
tractor on hire-purchase for N260,000 payable over 5 years in quarterly installments of
N13,000 inclusive of interest of N500 per quarter. The installments so far paid are:
N
30th June 2000 13,000
30th Sept. 2000 13,000
31st Dec. 2000 13,000
31st Mar. 2001 13,000
30th June 2001 13,000
65,000
Solution
Assessment Basis period Total
Year Allowance
N N
N
2001 (1/7/99-30/6/2000)
Installment paid less interest 12,500
Investment Allowance 1,250
Initial Allowance 50% 6,250 7,500
6,250
Annual Allowance 25% 1,562 1,562
W.D.V at 30/6/2000 4,688 9,062
2002 Installments paid less interest 50,000
(between 1/7/2000-30/6/2001)
Investment Allowance 5,000 54,688 5,000
Initial Allowance: 25,000
Annual Allowance:
25% of N12,500-6,250 1,562
25%ofN50,000-25,000 6,250 32,812 32,812
W.D.V at 30/6/2001 21,876 37,812
Example
Unongo Ltd purchased a motor car for N156,000 in September, 1997. The car is used by
the Managing Director and it has been agreed with the tax authorities that one-third of its
use is for private purposes. Accounts are made upon to 31st December each year.
Show the capital allowances for all years of assessment.
61
Solution
Assessment Motor Capital allowance
Car Business Private
2 1
Year N /3 /3
1998 Cost, September 1997 156,000
Initial Allowance, 50% 78,000 52,000 26,000
78,000
Annual Allowance, 25% 19,500 13,000 6,500
W.D.V 58,500
1999 Annual Allowance 19,500 13,000 6,500
W.D.V 39,000 6,500
2000 Annual Allowance 19,500 13,000 6,500
W.D.V 19,500
2001 Annual Allowance 19,490 12,933 6,497
W.D.V 10
Notes:
(1) Since the asset has not been disposed of, the annual allowance of 2001 has
to be reduced by N10 to enable the written-down value to be N10 until the
asset is sold.
(2) If it is assumed that the car was sold in June 2002 for N-500, the capital
allowance for 2003 would be
N
W.D.V 10
Sales proceeds 500
Balancing charge 490
Business 2/3 327
Private 1/3 163
490
62
Under a finance lease, ownership passes to the lessee at end of the lease, whereas it does
not under operating lease.
The basis period of the lessor for the purposes of calculating Capital allowances on leased
asset is the year immediately preceding the year of assessment.
A Building is disposed of if
(a) The relevant interest in the building is sold
(b) The interest in the building depends on a concession and that concession
comes to an end;
(c) The leasehold comes to an end otherwise than at the end of the lease;
(d) The building is demolished, destroyed or ceased to be in use for the
purposes of the trade or business carried on by the owner.
Plant, machinery or fixtures are disposed of if they are sold, discarded or scrapped.
Mining assets are disposed of if they are sold, ceases to be used for the purpose of the
trade or business either on the company ceasing to carry on such trade or business or on
receipt of insurance or compensation money thereof.
(a) On the disposal the sales proceeds is regarded as being equal to the residue
(hence there would be no Balancing allowance or Balancing charge).
63
(b) On re-use, the owner will be deemed to have bought the asset at a price
equivalent to the written-down value (residue) of the asset at the date of such disposal,
increased by the amount of Balancing charge or decreased by the amount of any
Balancing allowance. This is equivalent to saying that the owner would be deemed to
have bought the asset at a price equal to the initial disposal (value) but there cannot be
any Balancing allowance or Balancing charge as explained in (a) above.
Where, however, the building is sold before it has been used, all allowances will be
granted to the buyer and the original cost of construction will be taken to be the purchase
price for the purpose of capital allowances.
Further, so long as such asset has not been disposed of, it shall be deemed to be in use
(that is, temporary or permanent disuse not recognized).
This brings us to the key issue of the relevance of the permanent year end of a tax payer
before the correct basis period for capital allowance can be determined. Going back to the
64
date of 17th June 1996, the tax year may be 1997 year of assessment if the permanent year
end is a date after June. Examples include accounts for year ended 30th June 1996 up to
December 31 1996.
The relevant tax year when the asset is deemed to have been acquired would change to
1998 if the permanent year end of say 31st may is considered, the year would have ended
before June and hence 17th June, 1966 must fall into the basis period commencing 1st June
1996 and ending 1 march 1997 which automatically falls into 1998 year of assessment on
the proceeding year basis.
The determination of the basis period for capital allowance attains greater significance
because it will become important to identify when the initial allowance on such an asset
can be claimed. And given the fact that initial allowance can be claimed only once on the
qualifying capital expenditure, the year when such claim would be made needs be
established.
1. Under the normal basis period situation, it would always be observed that the
basis period for assessable profit is equal to the basis period for capital
allowance.
2. Under the abnormal basis period regime, the basis period for assessable profit
may never be equal to the basis period for capital allowance for two major
reasons.
The general practice is that where an asset can be allocated into more than one tax year,
the allocation would be made to the earlier tax year hence initial allowance can be
claimed in that earlier tax year.
Illustration
Alabama limited commenced business on 1st April, 1995 and has chosen 31st December
every year as its permanent tax year. You are to determine when initial allowance can be
claimed on the following qualifying capital expenditure.
Building 7/1/95
Furniture 28/4/96
65
Motor vehicle 19/2/96
Generator 21/7/96
Solution
Allocation of qualifying capital expenditure
Tax year Basis period for Basis period for Qualifying capital
assessable profit capital allowance allowance
1995 1/04/95-31/12/95 1/04/95-31/12/95 Building, Furniture
1996 1/04/95-31/03/96 1/01/96-31/03/96 Motor vehicle
1997 1/01/96-31/12/96 1/04/96-31/12/96 Generator
The important point to note here is in respect of assets acquired before the date of
commencement of business. The general rule is that where an asset is purchased before
the date of commencement, and there is proof that the first use to which the asset would
be put, will be for the purpose of the business, they are deemed to have been acquired on
the first day of business.
Meanwhile the coincidence of date occurs between 1995 and 1996 years of assessment in
the period 1/04/95 to 31/12/95 and the period 1/01/96 and 31/03/96 between 1996 and
1997 years of assessment. Observe that the asset have been allocated to the earlier tax
years.
Illustration
Anana limited changed its accounting date from 31st December to 31st march, every year
in 1995. You are required to determine when initial allowance should be claimed for the
following asset acquired.
Building 8/9/95
Solution
Allocation of qualifying capital expenditure
Tax year Basis period for Basis period for Qualifying capital
assessable profit capital allowance allowance
1996 1/04/95-31/12/95 1/01/95-31/12/95 Building, Furniture
1997 1/04/95-31/03/96 1/01/96-31/03/96
1998 1/04/96-31/03/97 1/04/96-31/03/97
The coincidence of date arose during the transition from the old date to new date in the
period 1/04/95-31/12/95 which is obtained in 1996 and 1997 years of assessment. The
building purchased on that date is allocated to 1996 tax year because it is the earlier of
the two.
66
4.19 Gaps in between basis period
This arises where a qualifying capital expenditure is acquired on a date that does not fall
into any basis period. The significance of this is the possibility of not being able to
allocate a qualifying capital expenditure. This will translate to a situation where capital
allowance cannot be claimed on an asset.
The general observation is that a gap will occur in between two basis periods mostly
under the cassation rule and sometimes where there is a change in accounting date. The
practice is that where a qualifying capital expenditure is acquired on a date that does not
fall into any basis period. Such an asset is allocated to the latter tax year. But then the
allocation to the latter tax year is only where the latter tax year is not a year of cessation.
Where the latter tax year is a year of cessation then the allocation must be to the earlier
tax year.
Illustration
Anana limited with a permanent year end of 31st August every year. The company wound
up with effect from 31st march 1996. You are required to determine when a generator
acquired on 17th September 1995.
Solution
Allocation of qualifying capital expenditure
Tax year Basis period for Basis period for Qualifying capital
assessable profit capital allowance allowance
1995 1/09/93-31/08/94 1/09/93-31/12/95 Generator
1996 1/01/96-31/03/96 1/01/96-31/03/96
It is to be observed that in a situation of cessation of business, the way to close the gap in
between the basis period for 1995 and 1996 is to use the earlier tax year, 1995 since the
latter tax year is a year of cessation.
Illustration
Amana limited changed its accounting date from 31st may every year to 31st December
every year in 1994. You are required to determine when initial allowance would be
claimed on the motor vehicle purchased on 28th November. 1993.
67
Solution
Allocation of qualifying capital expenditure
Tax year Basis period for Basis period for Qualifying capital
assessable profit capital allowance allowance
1994 1/06/92-31/05/93 1/06/92-31/05/93
1995 1/01/94-31/12/94 1/06/93-31/12/94 Motor vehicle
1996 1/01/95-31/12/95 1/01/95-31/12/95
In the above illustration, the gap has been covered by the 1995 basis period which is the
later tax year between 1994 and 1995 tax years.
Illustration
Dangano limited reported an adjusted profit of N6, 200,000. But has capital allowance
claimable of N6, 500,000.
You are required to compute the tax payable at 30 % if:
1. Dangano limited is an agricultural company
2. Dangano limited is a trading company
Solution
Dangano limited as an agricultural company
Assessable profit 6,200,000
Capital allowances 6,500,000
Relieved 6,200,000 6,200,000
Unutilized capital allowances c/f 300,000
Taxable profit 0
68
Relieved (2/3 X N6,200,000) 4,133,333 4,133,333
Unutilized capital allowances c/f 2,366,667
Taxable profit 20,666,667
It should also be noted that at the point of cessation of business, there may be
unutilized capital allowance which can no longer be carried forward. The position of
the law is that where this occurs, such unutilized capital allowances may be carried
backward for a maximum period of 5 tax years before the year of cessation. Where
this occurs, the unutilized capital allowance is to be used in reducing the taxable
profits of those years.
Exercises
1. Consider the following information for maigana traders in respect of some assets
disposed.
d. Land and building purchased for N1,000,000 in 1990 and with tax written
down value of N598,750 was disposed off for 1, 500,000
e. Motor vehicle with a tax written down value of N450,000 was disposed off for
N700,000 the original cost was N850,000
f. A set of office furniture and equipment was sold for N450,000. It originally
cost the company N600, 000 and the tax written down value at the time of
disposal was N479, 500.
2. Nasir Ltd has been in trading business for a number of years. The profits as
adjusted for tax purposes for the last 5 years are:
Accounting period N
1st Jan - 31st Dec 1998 100,000
1st Jan-31st Dec 1999 200,000
1st Jan - 31st Dec 2000 400,000
1st Jan-31st Dec 2001 300,000
69
Motor Vehicles 3rd June 20001 30,000
Industrial Buildings Extension 30th Nov 2000 10,000
3. Dangoya Nigeria Ltd which makes up accounts to 30th June each year purchased
a tractor on hire-purchase for N520, 000 payable over 5 years in quarterly installments of
N26,000 inclusive of interest of N1000 per quarter. The installments so far paid are:
N
30th June 2000 26,000
30th Sept. 2000 26,000
31st Dec. 2000 26,000
31st Mar. 2001 26,000
30th June 2001 26,000
130,000
70
CHAPTER FIVE
Deduct:
Non taxable income xx
Allowable expenses not reported xx xx
Illustration
Assume that a company makes up it accounts to 31st December of each year, then its
adjusted profit is assessable to tax as follows:
Accounting year
(Basis period) Assessment Year
71
Solution
If the accounting year ends on 31st March of every year, then the profit are assessable to
tax as follows:
and so on. We thus find, for example, that no matter what date the accounting year ends
in 1996, the profit of such accounts as adjusted for tax purposes is assessable to tax in
1997 fiscal year.
The above assumes that the accounting year is for a period of twelve months. Where
accounts are made up for a period more than 12 months, then adjustment is required,
since it is 12 months accounts that form the basis period.
72
5.3 Non-Allowable Expenses
The following expenses are not allowed for tax purpose:
(a) Depreciation
(b) Expenditure of a capital nature
(c) Any contribution to a fund not approved by the joint tax board
(d) Any provision for doubtful debt of a general nature
73
(i) dividend received by a company from another one provided that the equity
participation in which the dividend is paid :
The rate at which the interest from taxation shall be based on table 1 of schedule 3
of CITA as follows:
74
The implication of the above provision is that where any income is derived from a trade
or business by any of the above named bodies, tax liability will arise.
1. The profits of any company being a cooperative society registered under any
law relating to corporative societies
2. The profits of any company formed for the purpose of promoting sporting
activities where such profits are wholly expendable for such purpose, subject
to such conditions as the board may prescribe
3. The profits of any company being a body corporate established by or under
any local government law or edict in force in any state in Nigeria
4. The profits of non-Nigerian companies which would be chargeable to tax by
reason sorely of being brought into or received in Nigeria
5. The profits of any Nigerian company in respect of goods exported from
Nigeria provided that the proceeds from such exports are repatriated to
Nigeria and are used exclusively for the purpose of raw materials, plants,
equipment and spare parts
6. The profits of a company whose suppliers are exclusive inputs to the
manufacturing of exports provided the exporter shall give a certificate of
purchase of inputs of the exportable goods to the seller of the suppliers
Where two or more companies enter into a joint venture agreement or partnership, then
1. The joint venture or partnership is not chargeable to tax itself.
2. The profit chargeable to tax in the hand of each of the partners is the share of
profit from the partnership
3. Capital allowance on the same assets of the partnership shall be shared in the
agreed profit and loss sharing ratio
4. Where any of the companies involved in the partnership has another line of
business, the loss generated from the business will not be available for relief
against the profit generated from the partnership
Where a company is sold or transferred to another company either for the purpose of
better organization or transfer of management and provided that the revenue is of the
opinion that both companies belonging to the same holding company:
75
2. All the qualifying capital expenditure transferred are deemed to have been
made at their tax written down value. The balancing adjustment may be
computed
3. In the computation of capital allowance, no initial allowance may be
computed while the annual allowance would be based on the unexpired tax
life of the qualifying capital expenditure
4. Any unutilized capital allowances transferred are deemed to have been
transferred prior to the sale
5. Any unrelieved losses transferred are also deemed to have been relieved prior
to the transfer of sale
A reconstituted company is one registered in Nigeria to take over the assets of a foreign
company in Nigeria.
Where a company merges or amalgamates with another company to form a new company
1. The commencement rule is applicable to the newly formed company as it is
deemed to have commenced a new business
2. The cessation rule is applied on the companies that are merging as they are
deemed to have folded up
3. The qualifying capital expenditures transferred are deemed to have been made
at their agreed values. This will result in the computation of balancing
adjustment
76
4. No initial allowance may be claimed on the transferred assets. Annual
allowance to be claimed must be based on the unexpired tax life of the
qualifying capital expenditure
The dividend declared shall be treated as the taxable profit of the company and subjected
to tax in the hand of the company accordingly.
This is the position where a company has generated enough capital allowance to match
the assessable profit. It could also vary well be that the company has recorded a loss. This
will result in no tax payable because there will be no taxable profit. As a consequence,
the company may declare dividend to the shareholders.
Any such dividend paid automatically becomes the taxable profit chargeable to tax at the
ruling corporate income tax rate.
77
in Nigeria from which deliveries are regularly made by a person on behalf of the
company to the extent that the profits is attributable to the business or trade or
activities carried on through that person.
(3) If that trade or business or activities involves a single contract for surveys,
deliveries, installation or construction, the profit from that contract; and
(4) Where the trade or business or activities is between the company and another
person controlled by it or which has controlling interest in it and conditions are
made or imposed between the company and such person in their commercial or
financial relations which in the opinion of the Board is deemed to be artificial or
fictitious, so much of the profits adjusted by the Board to reflect arm's length
transaction.
A "Fixed base" in Nigeria does not include:
(a) Facilities used, solely for storage or display of goods or merchandise;
(b) Facilities used solely for the collection of information.
It is however, provided that where the Board is satisfied that the taxation authority of a
foreign country computes and assesses to tax on the basis similar to the Nigerian system,
then the profit from the Nigerian operation is ascertained by taking the ratio that the
airline's profit for the period before depreciation bears to the total revenue of the airline,
of the revenue from the Nigerian operation, that is,
78
Illustration
Pan African Airlines Ltd is a foreign airline which operates flights to and from Nigeria.
Its Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31st December, 2001 is given below:
N000 N000
Transportation Income
Income from passenger, cargo and mails:
Outside Nigerian sales 3,100,000
Nigerian sales 100,000 3,200,000
Other Income
Income from Properties (net) 25,000
Income from Maintenance (net) 50,000
Income from duty-free shop (net) 50,000
Income from catering (net) 75,000 200,000
Net Profit 500,000
Solution N000
Net transportation Profit as per account 300,000
Add Depreciation 320,000
Other disallowed expenses 180,000
Total Adjusted Profit 800,000
The effect of charging a portion of the revenue from Nigeria is to allow for the operating
expenses before depreciation on a pro-rata basis as it would be unfair to tax the entire
79
revenue without allowing for the expenses incurred in earning the revenue. Even then,
when section 12(1) of the Decree refers to "full profit or loss arising from the carriage of
passengers ... in Nigeria", one would have expected that this allows for expenses incurred
in earning the profit since "profit" is not the same thing as "revenue". But the Decree
seems to confuse "revenue" with "profit".
The "depreciation relief given is in place of capital allowances. Section 12(3) of the
Decree provides that where the above ratios cannot be satisfactorily applied, the Board
may use a "fair percentage" to compute the profit deemed to be derived from Nigeria.
The company affected however, is given the right of appeal within 6 years of the
assessment being made on the basis of "fair percentage" to be assessed under the above
provisions on the production of a certificate to the satisfaction of the board that his
country tax practice is similar to that of Nigeria.
The provision for unexpired risk must be at the percentage adopted by the company in
relation to its operations as a whole for such risk, thus different percentages may be
applied for different risks.
80
5.2.4 Foreign Life Assurance Companies
A foreign life assurance company which carries on business through a permanent
establishment in Nigeria is liable to tax on its profit computed by deducting a
management expenses and commissions from its investment income.
Where, however, profits of such a company accrue in part outside Nigeria, the profit shall
be the proportion of the total investment income of the company as the premiums
receivable in Nigeria bear to the total premiums receivable, less the agency expenses in
Nigeria, and a fair proportion of the head office expenses of the company The Board is
given power to substitute another basis for ascertaining the required proportion of the
total investment income where the head office of the life insurance company is outside
Nigeria.
It is also provided that where the company declares dividend to its shareholders from the
increase arising from actuarial revaluation of its life policy liabilities, the company shall
pay tax on the dividend as if such dividend is the total profit of the company
Illustration
British Assurance Co. Ltd. is a life assurance company incorporated in England but
which carries on business in Nigeria through a permanent establishment. The company's
Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31st December, 2001 is as follows: -
N N
Life Fund, 1st January, 2001 4,375,000
Premiums 6,625,000
Investment income (Gross) 900,000
11,900.000
Less: Claims paid 362,500
Provision for outstanding claims 1,050,000
Expenses • 180,000
Commissions 2,190,000
Surrenders 55,000
Bonuses 87,500
Life Fund, 31st December 2001 6,250,000
10,175,000
Profit
1,725,000
81
(3) Depreciation of assets in Nigeria included in expenses amounted to
N15,000.
Required: Compute the company's profit for tax purposes.
Solution:
Illustration
Arab Insurance Co. Ltd. is a foreign insurance company carrying on marine insurance
business in Nigeria through a permanent establishment. Its Revenue account for the year
ended 31st December 2001 is given below:
N000 N000
Gross Premiums receivable 1,048,500
less Reinsurance premium 975,000 73,500
Commissions receivable 12,750
Gross Interests and dividends 2,475
Reserve for unexpired risks,
1st Jan. 2001 1,800
90,000
Deduct
Claims 10,000
less recoverable from
re-insurer 6,250 3,750
Commissions payable 49,500
Office expenses 9,750
Provision for outstanding claims 750
Head Office expenses 6,750
Depreciation 3,000
Reserve for unexpired risk, 31st Dec., 2001 3,000 76,000
Profit 14,025
82
Solution:
"Permanent establishment" in Nigeria does not include an agency unless the agent has,
and habitually exercises, a general authority to negotiate and conclude contracts on behalf
of the insurance company
Example
XYZ Insurance Co. Ltd presents the following figures from its Trial Balance for the year
ended 31stMarch, 2001:
83
Claims recoverable from re-insurer 10,000
Agency fees and other expenses 20,000
Reserve for unexpired risks:
at 1st April 2000 50,000
at 31st March 2001 75,000
Life Department
Gross premiums receivable 150,000
Gross interest receivable 50,000
Other investment income (gross) 100,000
Claims paid 50,000
Commissions payable 50,000
Fund Management fees 10,000
Life Department running expenses 25,000
Life Fund at 1st April 2000 1,500,000
Required: compute the company's profit for tax purposes.
Solution
Life Business
Interest income (gross) 50,000
Other investment income (gross) 100,000
150,000
N
Deduct claims paid 50,000
commission
84
payable 50,000
Running exp. 25,000 125,000
Adjusted Profit from Life Business 25,000
Note: Management fee is not an allowable charge unless the agreement giving rise to
the fee was approved by the Minister of finance and the approved fee specified. Hence, in
the absence of further information, the management fee is disallowed.
Transactions between relations or between persons one of whom has control over the
other or both of whom are controlled by some other person shall be deemed to be
artificial or fictitious if in the opinion of the Board those transactions were not made at
arm's length.
85
(5) Agency fees for collection, maintenance or generally taking care of the
property
(6) Money spent in providing services to tenants where it is part of the
condition of tenancy
(7) For those who own estates, the construction and upkeep of roads and
Other motorways, drainage, etc. within.
All expenses of capital nature (except (7) above) are of course disallowable. So is
Depreciation.
Example
Nkere Nigeria Ltd. which has been in business for many years presents the following
adjusted profits for tax assessment:
Accounting Year Adjusted Profit (Loss)
Jan. - Dec. 2000 N20,000
Jan. - Dec. 2001 (N40,000)
Compute his assessable profits for the relevant years.
Solution
Tax Year Basis Assessable Loss
Profit c/f
N N
2001 Preceding year (2000) 20,000
2002 Preceding year (2001) Nil 40,000
Example
The adjusted profits and losses of Adio Ltd., which has been trading for many years are:
Accounting Year Profit (Loss)
86
N
1996 (200,000)
1997 40,000
1998 (20,000)
1999 50,000
2000 10,000
2001 30,000
You are required to compute the assessable profit for the relevant years.
Solution
ADIO LIMITED
Income Tax Assessment
87
Example
Nene Ltd. makes up its accounts 31st March. The tax information about the company is
given below:
Adjusted Profit N
Trading 200,000
Rent (gross) 50,000
Investment income (gross) 10,000
Capital allowances 20,000
Balancing allowance 1,000
Balancing charge 200
Loss from trading brought forward (250,000)
Required: Compute the Company's assessable profit.
Solution
Income Tax Assessment
N N
Profit from trade 200,000
Balancing charge 200
200,200
Less Capital allowance 20,000
Balancing allowance 1,000 21,000
Total Profits 179,200
Less Loss from trade b/f 250,000
Restricted to profit from trade 179,200 179,200
Loss (trade) c/f 70,800
Total Taxable Profit 0
Loss from trade c/f (70,800)
88
Example
lyeye Nigeria Limited commenced business on 1st April 1996 and makes up its accounts
to 31st March in each year. The adjusted profits for tax purposes as agreed with the tax
authorities are:-
N
31st March 1997 9,600
March 1998 (24,000) loss
March 1999 8,000
March 2000 8,000
March 2001 13,200
Shows the assessments for all the years.
Solution
Assessment Assessable
Year Profit
N
1996 1/4/96-31/12/96=9/12x9600 == 7,200
1997 12 months from commencement 1/4/96-31/3/97 == 9,600
1998 Preceding year = 9,600
1999 Preceding year Loss (N24,000) c/f Nil
2000 Preceding year N8,000
Less loss b/f (24,000)
Loss c/f (16,000) Nil
Now if the tax payer exercises its option to be assessed on the actual profits of the
second and third years of assessment the assessment would be:
Assessment Profit
N
1996 1/4/96 - 31/12/96 = 9/12 x 9600 7,200
1997 1/1/97-31/12/97
3/12x9600 = N2,400
9/12x24.000 = (N18,000)
Loss unrelieved c/f (N15,000) Nil
1998 Actual basis
1/1/98-31/12/98
3/12x24,000 loss = (N6,000)
9/12 x N8,000 profit = 6,000
0
Nil
89
1999 Preceding basis loss (N24,000) Nil
Loss relieved:
1997 N2,400
1998 6,000 8,400
Loss carried forward (15,600) Nil
Thus it will not pay the tax-payer to exercise the option because of two reasons:
(a) It will pay tax earlier, in 2001 instead of 2002.
(b) The assessable amount would be higher; hence a higher tax will be paid.
Notes
The second working has brought out features not disclosed in the first. Notice that the
unrelieved loss in 1997 (N15,600 is not carried forward and added to 1999 loss because it
is the same loss; it was merely apportioned in 1997 and not apportioned in 1999. To do
otherwise will be to duplicate the loss and claim relief for more than the actual loss and
this is not allowed as already said. Similarly, it would not be proper to carry forward the
whole of the loss which is the assessment figure for 1999 because part has been relieved
"effectively" in the earlier years owing to apportionment.
Example
Okesuna Ltd., which makes up its accounts to 31st December permanently ceased to
carry on business on 31st May 2002. The following adjusted profit/loss was agreed with
the Inland Revenue.
You are required to prepare the original assessment and the revised assessment if the
Inland Revenue exercises its option regarding the penultimate year.
Solution
Assessment
Profit
2001 Actual 1/1/01 - 31//5/01 Nil
90
2000 Penultimate year:
Original assessment
Preceding profit N24,000
or
Revised assessment:
(1) Capital allowances may be carried forward without a time limit whereas losses can
only be carried forward for 4 years.
(2) Capital allowances may be carried backward in the year of cessation, losses cannot.
For the reason in (1) where losses and capital allowances are carried forward, losses
should be relieved first.
Example
Okesuna Ltd., which makes up its accounts to 31st December each year permanently
ceased to carry on business on 31st May 2002. The following adjusted profits/loss were
agreed with the Inland Revenue.
91
Additions:
2000 March 2,000
September 3,000
December 3,000
Sale proceeds:
2002 15,000 48,000
You are informed that the assets brought forward from the end of 1999 accounting year
were bought in 1997 at:
Solution
Tutorial Note: In order to ascertain the annual allowance for the assets a working back
from date of acquisition is desirable. Such an exercise would also help regarding other
decisions which might be made regarding balancing charge restriction since the assets
were later sold.
92
1999 Annual Allowance 3, 570 2,720 6,470
WDV per question 3,750 19,040 42,210
Addition, 8000
2001 Investment Allowance N800
Initial Allowance 4,000
Annual Allowance 2,720
Old assert NIL
New assert 1,000 5,000
W.D.V 3,000 13,600
2002 (Basis period actual)
1/1/02-31/5/02
Addition, 2001 9,700
12,720
Investment Allowance N970
Initial Allowance 4,850
Annual Allowance:
1st assert 2,720
2ndAssert 5/12 X 1000 = 416
3rdAssert 5/12 X 1212 = 505 5,771 9,461
W.D.V. 6,929 10,880
2003 Sales proceeds 15,000 48,000
Balancing Allowance 8,071 8,071
Balancing Charge 37,120
Total charge restricted to 21,120
Total Allowance granted on the assert
(excluding investment allowance) 74,731
NOTES:
(1) Since the basis period for the year of cessation is less than 12 months, the annual
93
allowance is given pro rata.
(2) Total capital allowances granted on building from inception totaled N21,120,
hence balancing charge cannot exceed this amount.
(3) Since the business ceased in 2002 the Balancing allowance and balancing charge
will be carried back to 2001 in computing assessable profit.
(4) It will be recalled that the penultimate year assessment may be revised by the
Inland Revenue and assessed on the actual basis if that will provide a higher
assessable profit. When that is done, capital allowance computation would have to
revised too since the basis period has changed.
(5) The basis period (normal for 2001) is the accounting year to 31st December
2000. In 2002 the basis period is 1st January 2002 - 31st May 2002. There is thus
a gap of 12 months - the whole of 2001 hence assets purchased in 2001 rank for
capital allowances in 2002.
Since the assessment for 2001 would have been concluded on the normal basis (N24,000
- N8,520) at N15,480 before it became known that the business permanently ceased in
2002 thus requiring the re-opening of that assessment, the company would pay additional
tax on N3,588.
NOTES:
94
(1) It is important to observe carefully which of the capital allowance computations
have been used in the assessment.
(2) It would appear that the revised capital allowance computation is redundant. Yes,
so it is and is because the normal basis of assessment for the penultimate year is higher
than the actual basis. If the actual basis were higher we would have used the figures from
the revised computation.
The limit of 4 years for carrying forward loss does not apply to a company engaged in
agricultural trade or business. Such companies may carry forward their losses indefinitely
until relieved but they cannot carry the losses backward. Agricultural business comprises
activities involved in farming, deep sea fish trawling, animal husbandry and agro-allied
activities. Retailers and distributors of agric produce are excluded.
Rental income X
Investment income X X
Profits from all sources X
Balancing charge X
X
Less Capital Allowances:
Initial X
Annual X
Balancing X X
Loss b/f X X
Total Profit X
95
It will be recalled that "donations" are in total limited to 10% of the "Total Profits", the
excess is not allowable as deduction in computing the adjusted profit.
(b) For a company with turnover above N500,000 tax as computed under (a)
above plus 0.125% of the excess turnover.
Example
ISIAKU NIGERIA Ltd is a trading company owned by Nigerians and has been carrying
on business since 1987. During the year ended 31st December, 2001, the results of the
company's activities were as follows:
Assets Employed
Fixed Assets 200,000,000
Current Assets 560,000,000
Less: Current Liabilities 370,000,000
Net Current Assets 190,000,000
390,000,000
Financed by
96
Long Term Loans 70,000,000
390,000,000
Notes:
(i) The turnover of the company during the year ended on 31st December, 2001 was
N200,000, 000.
(ii) Gross Profit was N35, 000,000.
(iii) Assessable Profit for 2002 year of assessment was N2, 100,000.
(iv) Unrelieved Capital Allowances brought forward from 2001 year of assessment
was N600,000.
(v) Capital allowance for the 2002 year of assessment was N950, 000.
You are required to compute the company's tax liability for 2002 year of
assessment taking cognizance of the Minimum Tax Provisions,
Solution
ISIAKU NIGERIA LIMITED
2002 INCOME TAX COMPUTATIONS
BASIS PERIOD: 1/I/01-31/12/OI
N N
Assessable Profit 2,100,000
Deduct:
Unrelieved Capital allowances b/f 600,000 600,000
Current Year Capital Allowances 950,000 950,000
1, 550,000 550,000
97
B. Plus Tax on Excess Turnover over N500,000 at 0.125%
That is N (200,000,000-500,000) .0125% = 2, 493,750
Minimum Tax Payable is A + B 11, 993, 750
TAX LIABILITY = N11, 993, 750
98
Example
First Credit Bank Ltd lent N300,000 to ABC Ltd a company engaged in manufacturing
and export business. The loan bears interest at the rate of 15% p.a. and is repayable in 5
years installments. The moratorium period is two years.
Show the interest to be brought into the banks income tax computation for each of the
years concerned.
Solution
Tutorial Note: Since the moratorium period is 2 years and repayment period 5 years, it
means that the duration of the loan is 7 years.
Repayment will start in the 3rd year. Interest shown below is calculated on the amount of
loan outstanding at the beginning of each year.
BANK'S INCOME
Accounting Gross Tax exempt Taxable
Year Interest 70% 30%
N N- N
N
1 45,000 31.500 13,500
2 45,000 31.500 13,500
3 45,000 31,500 13,500
4 36,000 25.200
10,800
5 27,000 18,900 8,100
6. 18,000 12,600 5,400
7 9,000 6,300 2,700
Notes
We seize this opportunity to point out that the interest which the bank charges it
customers for loans is not subject to withholding tax because it is impracticable for the
customer to "withhold tax" which would later be remitted to the tax authorities. This is
because although the customer "pays" the interest, it is a mere book entry that reduces the
customers balance (or increases in case of overdraft) with the bank. Therefore in the
income tax computation of the bank no tax has been suffered at source on such interest.
99
Interest Earning of Banks Exempted from Tax
Effective, 1st Jan. 1997 interest earned by banks from loans granted for the following
purposes are exempted from tax provided the moratorium is not less than 18 months.
1. Loans for agricultural trade and business
2. Loans for companies or persons engaged m fabrication of local plant and machinery
3. Loan for working capital for cottage industries established under the family
Economic Development Programme.
Before 1st January 1997, the exemption applied to interest earned on loan granted for
agricultural trade or business only.
Foreign loan means any loan granted by a foreign company with moneys brought into
Nigeria from any territory or country outside Nigeria or any loan granted in a currency
other than the Naira.
In making payment for the three types of loan interest referred to in the preceding
paragraphs the paying company must not deduct withholding tax.
100
Repayment
period for Tax relief
the Loan
Interests on such loan are therefore not subject to withholding tax. However, it is not
clear, in the case of the second class of loan how the tax would be collected if, for
example, the lender is not resident in Nigeria and does not submit accounts to the tax
authority By implication therefore the company making such payment should deduct the
tax and remit to the Inland Revenue. If the Standard income tax rate is 35% the interest
for loan duration of 5 - years will be taxed at 17.5%, which is higher than the withholding
tax rate. Something is wrong with this law, as this is not the intention.
The relief may be withdrawn where the first class of loan is repayable within a period less
than 8 years and the second class within a period less than 4 years.
WITHHOLDING TAX
Certain incomes are liable to a tax known as "Withholding tax" and not income tax. This
tax is deducted at source by the paying company. A company making such payments is
obliged to deduct withholding tax and pay over the tax so deducted to the relevant tax
authority. The relevant tax authority is the Federal Inland Revenue Service where the
beneficiary is a company and the State Inland Revenue Board where the income recipient
is an individual or firms (unincorporated business organizations). The incomes liable to
withholding tax at source and the applicable withholding tax rates are:
Income/Earnings Withholding
Tax Rate
1. Rent 5%
2. Interest 5%
3. Interest on bank deposit 15%
In the case of savings passbook account deduction is made only if the
amount on deposit is N50, 000 or more
101
4. Fee for use or hire of any equipment 15%
5. Dividend 5%
6. Directors fees 15%
7. Royalties 15%
8. Management fees 15%
9. Building construction and related activities 2 1/2 %
10. All types of contracts and agency arrangements
other than sales in the ordinary course of business 2 1/2 %
11. Consultancy services 10%
12. Management services 10%
13. Technical services 10%
14. Commissions 10%
Remittance to the relevant tax authority should accompany the following information:
There is a fine of N5, 000 for failure to deduct and account for withholding tax. The tax
withheld is to be remitted within 30 days of the payment.
102
DIVIDENDS EXEMPTED FROM WITHHOLDING TAX
The following dividends are not subject to withholding tax and should therefore be paid
gross to the beneficiary:
(1) Bonus shares
(2) Dividend paid by a Pioneer company
(3) Dividend distributed out of taxed petroleum profit
(4) Capital distributions made by the liquidator of a company in the process of
winding up.
(5) Dividend as stated in the section on "profit exempted"
(6) Dividends of small companies
(7) Dividends from manufacturing companies in petrochemical and liquefied
natural gas industries.
Where profits are treated as distributed then such shall be regarded as the incomes of the
persons who are shareholders in the company in proportion to their shareholdings. The
company is then under obligation to pay over withholding tax on such deemed dividend.
Exercise
1. Alex Airlines Ltd is a foreign airline which operates flights to and from Nigeria.
Its Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31st December, 2001 is given below:
N000 N000
Transportation Income
Income from passenger, cargo and mails:
Outside Nigerian sales 2,200,000
Nigerian sales 200,000 2,400,000
103
Depreciation 480,000
Other disallowed expenses 220,000 2,000,000
Net Transportation Profit 400,000
Other Income
Income from Properties (net) 35,000
Income from Maintenance (net) 70,000
Income from duty-free shop (net) 20,000
Income from catering (net) 75,000 200,000
Net Profit 600,000
You are required to compute the amount of tax payable by Alex Airlines Ltd.
2. Namu Insurance Co. Ltd presents the following figures from its Trial Balance for
the year ended 31stMarch, 2001:
3. Amiko Ltd is a trading company owned by Nigerians and has been carrying on
business since 1987. During the year ended 31st December, 2001, the results of the
company's activities were as follows:
104
Assets Employed
Fixed Assets 100,000,000
Current Assets 280,000,000
Less: Current Liabilities 185,000,000
Net Current Assets 95,000,000
195,000,000
Financed by
Notes:
(i) The turnover of the company during the year ended on 31st December, 2001 was
N200, 000. 000.
(ii) Gross Profit was N30, 000,000.
(iii) Assessable Profit for 2002 year of assessment was N2, 000,000.
(iv) Unrelieved Capital Allowances brought forward from 2001 year of assessment
was N46,000,000.
(v) Capital allowance for the 2002 year of assessment was N980, 000.
You are required to compute the company's tax liability for 2002 year of
assessment taking cognizance of the Minimum Tax Provisions,
105
CHAPTER SIX
PARTNERSHIP ASSESSMENT
Capital allowance or balancing charge is also shared in the profit/loss sharing ratios.
Illustration
Kongi, Abu and Etim have been in partnership for many years sharing profit and
losses in the ration of 2:2:1. Kongi, Abu and Etim respectively contributed N 10,00, N
10,000 and N 5,000 as capital at 10% interest p.a. Abu granted a loan of N ^,000 at 120%
interest p.a. After taking into account the following items, the adjusted profit of the firm
was N 35,000 for the accounting period ended October 31, 20001.
Kogi Abu Etim
Interest on Capital N N N
Interest on loan 1,000 1,000 1,000
Salaries and Allowances - 720 -
Leave passage 6,000 5,000 4,000
Consulting fee 1,500 1,200 1,200
Rent received 2,000 - 3,000
Use of private vehicle for partnership - 2,400
Business 600 - -
There was a capital allowance of N 5,000 during the accounting period. The following
information is also available:
106
Life Assurance Policy:
Capital assured N 8,000 N 6,000 N 7,000
Annual premium 1,000 5,000 9,000
Solution
COMPUTATION OF ASSESSABLE INCOMES
Kongi Abu Etim Total
Share of profit N N N N
Interest on Capital 1,928 1,928 964 4,820
Interest on loan 1,000 1,000 500 2,500
Salaries and Allowances - 720 - 720
Leave passages 6,000 5,000 4,000 15,000
Consulting fee 1,500 1,200 1,200 3900
Rent received 2,000 - 3,000 5,000
Private Vehicle used - 2,400 - 2,400
Assessable Income 660 - - 660
Less Capital Allowance 13,088 12,248 9,664 35,000
Total Income (earned) 2,000 2,000 1,000 5,000
11,088 10,248 8,664 30,000
All incomes derived from the firm is regarded as trading or business income even
though some of them in other cases are unearned incomes. By adding them back to the
partners shares of “profit” they are indirectly being treated as “disallowed”.
107
or resignation, he is determined to have permanently ceased business or profession and
therefore the cessation provision apply, but without affecting the other partners who
continue in the business or profession after his withdrawal from the firm. Thus we see
that the commencement and cessation provisions apply to the partners individually.
Profit/losses have to be apportioned on time basis.
Illustration
Messrs. Uche, Jubril and Tune have being in partnership for several years as
surveyors and operate under the name of “UJT Surveyors”.
Accounts are made up to December 31st of each year and adjusted profits for 4
years were as follows.
N
Year ended December 31st 1998 144,000
Year ended December 31st 1999 165,000
Year ended December 31st 2000 240,000
Year ended December 31st 2001 220,000
On 31st May 2000 Uche retired and Kola was admitted into the partnership the
following day no a salary of N 18,000 p.a. He brought in a capital of N 21,000. It was
agreed that Kola was to share profits on the basis of the enjoyed by Uche.
You are required to compute the partners' assessable profits for 2000 year of assessment.
Solution
WORKINGS
The adjusted profits before deducing partners’ salaries and interest on capital between the
two partnership are:
“Old” Partnership
N
st
Year ended 31 December 1998 144,000
Year ended 31st December 1999 165,000
5 months ended May 2000 5/12x 240,000 = 100,000
“New partnership”
7 months ended 31st December 2000 – 7/12x 24,000 = 140,000
Year ended 31st December 2001 = 220,000
108
Year Profit Jubril Tunde Kola Uche Total
1998 Profit 31,020 15,510 15,510 62,040
Salary 24,000 18,000 36,000 78,000
Interest on capital 1,800 1,260 900 3,960
Total profits 56,820 34,770 52,410 144,000
1999 Profit 41,520 20,760 20,760 83,040
Salary 24,000 36,000 36,000 78,000
Interest on capital 1,800 1,260 900 3,960
Total profits 67,320 40,020 57,660 165,000
2000 Profit 84,165 42,033 16,462 25,620 168,330
Salary 24,000 18,000 15,000 10,500 67,500
Interest on capital 1,800 1,260 375 735 4,170
Total profits 109,965 61,343 31,837 36,855 240,000
2001 Profit 77,840 38,920 - 38,920 155,680
Salary 24,000 18,000 - 18,000 60,000
Interest on capital 1,800 1,260 - 1,260 4,320
Total profits 103,640 58,180 - 58,180 220,000
Illustration
Ulaeto who has been trading for a number of years decided to from a partnership
with Lkpong with effect from 1st January; 31st December. Qualifying expenditures on
plant and machinery were:
109
Purchased by cost Date of
N purchase
Ulaeto 20,000 1/4/1998
Ulaeto 40,000 20/12/1999
Ulaeto 60,000 1/1/2000
Ulaeto and lkpong 40,000 10/1/2001
Ulaeto and lkpong 20,000 1/6/2001
Compute the Capital Allowance of the individuals for all the years affected.
New Business
2001 (Basis period actual) 81,600
WDV b/f 60,000
Addition 141,600
Investment 6,000
Initial 12,000
Annual:
Old assets 9,600
New asset 4,800 26,400 16,200 16,200
WDV 115,200 66,600 16,200
New to Working
110
2000 is the “year of cessation” of the business of Mr. Ulaeto hence the Basis
period is actual i.e 1/1/00 – 31/12/00. But the normal basis period for 1999 is
1/1/98 – 31/12/ 98 meaning that there is a gap of 12 months { the whole of 1999}
hence assets purchased during that period claimed allowance in 1999 year of
assessment.
(2) 2001 is the year of change in business ownership and a new business is deemed to
have commenced on 1st January 2001, hence the basis period is actual.
It is important to note that the Federal Capital Territory of Abuja is regarded as a state in
law.
111
A tax deduction card accompanies notice of coding. The card spreads the “free-
pay allowance” over the twelve months of the year and contains a historical record of tax
deducted or refunded on monthly basis. A specimen of the card is given below.
Generally, the tax implication of the above situations can be seen thus; when one
company sells its undertakings to another and permanently cease to carry on business,
this means there is acquisition of one business by another business, it will then mean that
the business will be assessed to tax according to the cessation principles while the
purchaser company will be assessed according to the commencement principle in respect
of that part taken-over. When the purchaser is a new company, it could be seen as a new
company just stating, this means you treat the company as a new company stating a
business. In case the business is an existing business there may be some complications.
This may arise as to whether commencement principles should apply to that aspect of the
business that has just commence while the existing business will be assessed as usual or
whether the business newly acquired is regarded as an expansion of the existing business
and therefore assessed as a single continuing business. The determining factor here is to
determine whether the business of the former or old company is essentially the same
business as that of the purchaser or not. If the company is the same as the purchaser then
no new business has commence by acquiring another company, but if it not the same
business, then a new business has commenced which is a quit different from the old
company and therefore should be assessed differently.
Illustration
The adjusted profits of two businesses that operate similar trade are as follows.
Mama Baba
N N
Year ended 31st March 1992 91,200 169,600
Year ended 31st March 1993 70,400 220,000
Year ended 31st March 1994 147,200 387,200
112
It has been agreed that one company is taking over the other business with effect from
31st March 1995. The profits of the company after the taking over as at 31st March 1996
are estimated to be as follows:
N N
Assuming the company taken-over to go into liquidation, you are required to advise
which company should take over the other to secure maximum tax advantage assuming:
Solution
or Actual
3/12 x 220,000 + 9/12 x387,200 345,400 345,400
113
Baba business takes over Mama business.
Conclusion: if the two companies are in a similar trade it is suggested that Mama
should take over Baba business as this will reduce that total tax liability and hence the
total tax payable.
Next we consider the situation where the two companies do not operate the same type of
business.
Solution
Mana business takes over Baba business.
1994 96,800
1993 3/12 x 220,000 + 9/12 x387,200
(345,400) 345,400
442,200
114
1997 Actual January – December 1997
9/12 x 432,000 + 3/12 x ?? Date
Incomplete
[
Commencing rules for Baba’s new sources of Income
N
1995 first year, Actual 3/12 x 100,000 25,000
1996 first 12 months 100,000
1997 preceding year 144,000
115
and Cessation rules. In that respect the Decree says that the FBIR may at its discretion
direct that:
(i) The provisions regarding new business and cessation of business shall not
apply.
(ii) Assets sold or transferred, for the purpose of Capital allowances, be
deemed to have bee sold for an amount equal to the residue of the asset on
the day following such sale or transfer, and
(iii) The company acquiring each such asset shall not be entitled to initial
allowance and any allowance deemed to have been received by the vendor
company.
The Board may direct any of the company in the sale or transfer to guarantee or give
security for payment in full of all tax due or to become due by the company selling or
transferring such trade or business.
Exercise
1. A, B and C have been in partnership for many years sharing profit and losses in
the ration of 2:1:2. A, B and C respectively contributed N 20,00, N 10,000 and N 20,000
as capital at 10% interest p.a. B granted a loan of N 4,000 at 10% interest p.a. After
taking into account the following items, the adjusted profit of the firm was N 40,000 for
the accounting period ended October 31, 20001.
Kogi Abu Etim
Interest on Capital 2000 2,000 2000
Interest on loan 400
Salaries and Allowances 7,000 4,000 5,000
Leave passage 1,800 1,400 1,200
Consulting fee 2,000 - 4,000
Rent received - 2,200
Use of private vehicle for partnership
Business 800 - -
There was a capital allowance of N 8,000 during the accounting period. The following
information is also available:
A B C
Marital status Married Married Married
Number of children 6 4 3
116
Dependent Relatives 3 2 1
Adopted Children - - 2
2. The adjusted profits of two businesses that operate similar trade are as follows.
A B
N N
Year ended 31st March 1992 90,200 150,000
Year ended 31st March 1993 75,600 320,000
Year ended 31st March 1994 156,200 480,200
It has been agreed that one company is taking over the other business with effect from
31st March 1995. The profits of the company after the taking over as at 31st March 1996
are estimated to be as follows:
N N
Assuming the company taken-over to go into liquidation, you are required to advise
which company should take over the other to secure maximum tax advantage assuming:
117
Purchased by cost Date of
N purchase
U 40,000 1/4/1998
U 30,000 20/12/1999
U 70,000 1/1/2000
U and L 50,000 10/1/2001
U and L 30,000 1/6/2001
Compute the Capital Allowance of the individuals for all the years affected.
118
CHAPTER SEVEN
PETROLEUM PROFIT TAX
Now, as soon as the crude is produced the API is compared with the standard API
and which can be either higher or lower. This will further have complication with the
price of the crude oil, the higher the API, the higher the price of the crude oil.
Furthermore, the disposable value of the crude oil or gas for petroleum profit tax
purposes is not the price at which the oil producing company sells the crude oil, but a
value determined by the government. Generally, there are many pricing methods, they
include; the posted price, official selling price, and the offset price.
Posted price is the price fixed for crude oil by government for the purpose of
computing the revenue derivable from the oil business. Prices are fixed according to the
grade of the Nigerian crude oil in question. If the grade of crude oil is different from the
standard API, then the posted price is escalated or discalated by a specified amount for
each 10 API above or below the standard API respectively. This means that if the actual
API is higher the posted price is adjusted upwards and adjusted downward if the actual
API is less than the standard API for that type of crude oil.
119
Illustration
Assume that the actual gravity of crude oil produced by Boby oil is
Bonny Light 420 API
Bonny medium 260 API
Calculate the adjusted posted price for valuing the crude oil produced.
Notes: that the posted price and standard gravity of the products are:
Bonny Light 380 API at $20.50
Bonny medium 280 API at $19.50
If the grade of crude oil is different from the standard API, then the posted price
escalated or discalated by 2 cents ($0.02) for each 10 API above or below the standard
gravity.
Solution
Bonny light Bonny medium
Standard API 380 280
Actual API 420 260
Increase/decrease 40 (20)
Posted price $20.50 $19.50
Price adjusted 40 X 0.02 =.08 (20) X 0.02 =.04
Adjusted price $20.58 $19.46
($20.50 + .08) ($19.50 - .04)
Under the petroleum profit tax act 1959 the price used in the computation of the
sales value is the higher of
1. The posted price
2. The selling price
It should also be noted that crude oil is not useful for anything until it is refined
into petrol, kerosene, lubricating oil, automotive gas oil or diesel oil, fuel oil, asphalt
(bitumen), e.t.c. it should also be noted that companies engaged in manufacturing and
selling of the refined products are not subject to petroleum profit tax, they are taxed under
the companies income tax act.
The Gas aspect of the crude refers to the gas obtained from natural gas before it is
refined. Therefore, cooking gas (liquefied petroleum gas) and other forms of gas
consumed are refined gas and the companies dealing in refined gas are not subject to
petroleum profit tax but under the companies income tax act. ‘Casing head petroleum
spirit’ is any liquid hydrocarbon obtained from natural gas by separation or by any
chemical or physical process, but before the same has been refined, transformed or
otherwise treated.
This has brought us to the understanding that there may be companies that engaged
themselves in the oil industry but not taxable under the petroleum profit tax. They include
for example:
120
1. Oil service companies which engage in drilling, logging, exploration and other
similar services as contactors for oil producing companies.
2. Refining operations.
3. Contractors under service contracts with oil producing companies.
4. Transporters of crude oil from Nigeria to other countries.
They are therefore taxed under the companies income tax act.
Petroleum profit tax arises on actual year basis at 85% of taxable or chargeable profit
obtained as follows.
Adjusted profit X
Losses X
Relieved X X
X
Add
Balancing charge X
Assessable profit X
Capital allowance X
Relieved X X
Taxation/chargeable profit X
Step 1: Identify the net profit or loss per the account presented
Step 2: Add non-allowable expenses and taxable incomes that were not reported in the
account, such as taxable income may be reported in the note to the
accounts. It may also be that only a portion of the income that should be
subjected to tax was reported in the account. In this case there will be the
need to determine the short fall and add back.
Step 3: Deduct non-taxable incomes and allowable expenses that were not previously
reported in the account. Such allowable expenses will need to be identified
either as a note to the account or as one that may not even be indicated. An
example of an allowable expense that may not be indicated is the
allowable education tax.
Step 4: Deduct losses brought forward
Step 5: Add back balancing charges arising form the disposal of assets
121
Step 6: Deduct capital allowance from the assessable profit to obtain taxable or
chargeable profit.
Step 7: Apply the petroleum profit tax rate of 80% on the taxable or chargeable profit to
obtain the assessable tax.
Step 8: Tax offsets and MOU credit from assessable tax to obtain chargeable tax.
7.1 Royalty
The royalty is payable on quantity produced whether for export or for refining in Nigeria.
Royalty is calculated on the fiscal value of he oil or gas produced.
The rate used in the computation is as given below:
On shore production 20%
Off shore production in areas:
Up to 100 meters of water 18.5%
Beyond 100 meters of water 16.5%
The license authorizes the holder to explore and prospect for petroleum in a specified
area usually measured in acres of land in case of land prospecting (on shore) or meters of
depth into the sea in the case of water prospecting (off-shore). The total life span of an
OPL is 5 years after which if petroleum is not found the explorer must quit. Yearly rent is
payable for each field covered by OPL and an oil prospecting company may obtain many
OPLs.
OPL/OML rents payable for the area petroleum is produced may be deducted from the
gross royalty in computing the net royalty payable if the OPL and OML granted the
company allow for such deduction. Where the rent is higher than the royalty the excess is
called non-productive rent and is an allowable expense. Further, where under the same
OPL one field has a non productive rental and another has a net royalty, the later may be
used to reduce the non productive rental or offset it altogether. Therefore, this implies
that royalty should be calculated field by field.
Illustration
The following example illustrates the method of comparing the gross royalty liability and
deductions of OPL and OML rentals allowed in arriving at the net royalty payable and
deal briefly with the procedure involved.
122
The following data are extracted from the books and records of Mawa oil company for
the accounting year ended 31st December 2000.
123
Computation of net royalty payable
OPL OML Field Fiscal Gross OML Net Non
value of royalty rental royalty productive
oil rent
101 154 A 1,391,00 278,200 - 278,200
S 0 98,300 2,000 96,300
C 491,500 55,500 55,500
155 D 277,500 26,200 1,700 24,500
E 131,000 9,800 9,800
49,000 468,000 3,700 464,300
2,340,00
0
102 167 J 80,000 16,000 19,000 3,000 3,000
168 K 96,000 19,200 1,720 -17,480
176,000 35,200 20,720 14,480
201 214 P 64,000 12,800 12,800
NET ROYALTY PAYABLE 491,580
It should be noted that from the quantities produced, an allowance is made for the
following quantities which must be certified by the ministry of petroleum.
1. Usage by the company in carrying on its operation
2. Quantities re-injected into formation
3. Reasonable loss due to evaporation
The resulting quantity is then term net barrels produced. Further all cost certified by the
head of petroleum inspectorate as applicable to handling, treating and storing that
reduced quantity and in transporting it to a tanker at a Nigerian port or to a refinery in
Nigeria is deductible from gross royalty. The barrel is the cost unit for crude oil while
standard cubic feet or meter is for gas.
Crude oil and gas taken by government free of cost is not subject to royalty payment
124
9. Royalties both on local and export sales
10. Productive and non productive rents
11. Custom duties whether on essential or non essential items
12. All sum of liability for which was incurred by the company during the
period to the federal government of Nigeria by way of duty (including
stamp duty) other than tax imposed by the petroleum profit tax act, or
any rate, impost, fees other similar charges.
13. Legal expenses including
i. General legal advisory service
ii. Renewal of a short lease
iii. Retainer fees and
iv. Cost of protecting or defending the business
14. Any expenses wholly, reasonably, exclusive necessarily incurred for
petroleum business
125
tanker is not an income derived from petroleum operation. Consequently, the
income is not chargeable to tax under the provisions of the petroleum profit tax
act.
The position of the law is that such an income should be subjected to tax under
the provisions of the company income tax act.
It should be noted that any expense incurred to earn the income from the
transportation of crude oil shall be treated as a non-allowable expense under the
petroleum profit tax act. Such an expense should be used to reduce the income
before being subjected to tax under the company income tax act.
The same principle discussed on the treatment of income derived from the
transportation of oil will be fully applicable to the treatment of income from
refinery business.
The principle here is very straight forward the education tax allowable should be
2% of assessable profit. In accordance with provisions of the act, assessable profit
under the petroleum profit tax act is obtained when balancing charges are added
to and losses deducted from adjusted profit.
126
3. Value natural gas sold
4. Miscellaneous income
Illustration
Aa oil incorporated sold 300,000 barrels a day to its market in Nigeria at a price of N18
barrel. You are to estimate the value of chargeable oil sold.
Solution
Value of oil sold = price X number of barrels sold
= N18 X 300,000
= N5, 400,000.
Posted price is defined as the price free on board at the Nigerian port of export as agreed
between NNPC and Companies operating in the petroleum sector.
Note that the posted price is defined by the quality of the crude oil. The quality of the
crude oil is half defined by the standard API gravity. The higher the API gravity the
higher the quality of the crude and consequently the higher the price it will attract. Where
the actual of the crude oil is not the same as the standard quality, the posted price will be
appropriately adjusted depending on the agreed rate of change.
Also note that the actual price of the crude oil may be provided. The posted price will
usually be compared to the actual price of the crude. The general practice of the Federal
Inland Revenue service is to assess the tax payer based on the higher of the two prices.
127
Illustration
Ab boys petroleum limited sold 4000 barrels of crude oil to one of its customers in the
inland. The crude oil has an API gravity of 35o. The standard API of crude oil is 30o with
a price of $15.00. It has been agreed that or every degree rise or fall in API the price shall
rise or fall by $0.50. The rate of exchange is N100 to $1.
You are required to determine the value of oil sold if the actual price is N1200 per barrel.
Solution
Value of oil sold = price X number of barrels sold
= N1200 X 400,000
= 480,000,000
Illustration
A pipeline was constructed for N10, 000,000. The total capacity of the pipeline is
4,000,000 barrels. During the year under review only 200,000 barrels of oil was
transported to the refinery. The total cash cost was N600,000 while the depreciation
charge for the year at 10% amounted to N1,000,000.
128
Solution
COM = AVDD X TCM
AVD
Where;
COM = Cost of maintenance
AVDD = Actual volume delivered
TCM = Total cost of maintenance
AVD = Actual volume delivered
The amount of discount to be granted is determined by the quality of the gas while the
quality of the gas is itself defined by the load factor. The stated load factor has a
corresponding gas factor as shown below. The gas factor or G- factor means the gas
production cost adjustment factor.
Where the actual lead factor for a gas contract differs from the stated standard shown
above, the corresponding gas factor will be determined by extrapolation.
Step 1: Identify the actual load factor of the gas contract
Step 2: Determine where the actual load factor can be located on the table if the
load factor does not exist on the table. For example, a load factor of 67 0 falls
between 600 and 700 .
Step 3: Deduct the actual load factor from the lower of the standard load factor
between which the actual load factor is located. Divide this by the difference
between the lower and the higher standard load factors. Equate this to the
equivalent gas factors. The corresponding gas factor for the actual load factor may
be represented by X%
129
Step 5: Multiply X% by the value of the contract sum to determine the value of
gas sold that may be subjected to tax.
Step 6: Deduct the value of discount from the contract sum to determine the value
of gas sold that may be subjected to tax.
Illustration
Danda oil company entered into a gas contract with kaka oil company of London. The
value of the contract is $6 million. The load factor of the gas was recorded as 670.
You are required to determine the value of gas sold.
Solution
Contract sum 6, 000 ,000
Less level of discount 988,800
Value of gas sold 5, 011, 200
Note: the actual load factor of 57 lies between 50 and 60 on the standard table.
50 – 57 = 16.9 – X
50 – 60 16.9 – 15.5
Miscellaneous Income
The following are considered as miscellaneous income under the petroleum profit tax act.
1. Interest on fixed deposit
2. Services provided to other petroleum companies
3. Rent of classified into paid by the NNPC
4. Sublet of accommodation
5. Rent/ hire of equipment.
This position must be compared to the provisions of the company income tax act where
losses may only be carried forward for a maximum period of four years except fro
agricultural business.
130
7.12 Capital Allowance
The only Capital Allowances granted for PPT are:
(1) Petroleum Investment Allowance
(2) Annual Allowance, and
(3) Balancing Allowance (if any),
The Balancing charge would also be made as in the case of Companies Income Tax Act.
Before 1st Jan. 1999 P. I. A. was called "Investment Tax Credit" and treated as a tax
offset.
(c) the construction of any works or building that are likely to be of little or
no value when petroleum operations for which they were constructed
ceased to be carried on.
Qualifying expenditure must not include any expenses allowed as deduction in arriving
at the adjusted profit.
131
This must be retained for as long as the asset has no been sold. Also note that even where
the asset is disposed, approval must be obtained from the minister of petroleum resources
before the residual value can be expunged from the books.
Illustration
Sam limited has an assessable profit of N80 million for 1898 tax year. The following
information was provided:
You are required to compute the capital allowance to be claimed and the taxable profit.
Solution N
Assessable profit 80 ,000
Capital allowance
132
7.15 Expenditures before Sale or Disposal of Chargeable Oil
It will be recalled that Oil Company is chargeable to tax only when it makes a sale or
disposal of chargeable oil; hence that day marks the beginning of its "accounting period".
By the nature of the Oil industry, many years are usually spent in searching for oil and
during these years expenses both capital and revenue are of course incurred in petroleum
operations. What then happens to these expenditures? The answer is that they should be
accumulated and would be regarded as having been incurred on the "first day of the
accounting period. The only exception is the expenditure incurred for purchasing
information about existence and extent of petroleum deposits which is specifically
excluded from qualifying expenditure test:
Thus one per cent of the cost of the asset is left at the end of the fifth year as tax written
down value until the asset is sold or scrapped when the sale proceeds would be set against
the WDV to arrive at Balancing Allowance or Balancing Charge as the case may be.
Annual Allowance is not given "per annum" hence if the asset is owned and used for
Petroleum Operation for only one month (or less) of the accounting period, full allowance
would be given.
(1) The Oil Company must be the owner of the asset (PIA not granted on
leased asset).
133
Rate per annum
On-Shore operations 5
Off-Shore Operations:
100 meters of water depth 10
100 -200 meters of water depth 15
The tax off set was used up to the end of 1994 year of assessment, the provision of the act
is that tax offset should be used to reduce the assessable profit to obtain the tax
chargeable profit.
The amendment of 1995 abrogated the provisions concerning tax off set. All items of
expenditures were to be considered as allowable expenses under the provisions of the act.
Consequently, non-productive rent royalties on local sales and customs duties on
essential items are now considered as allowable expenses. This can be seen under the
allowable and non allowable items.
Example
Adamu Petroleum Company (Nigeria) Limited is in the Oil Producing business. Its
accounts for 1999 are as follows:
N N
Net fiscal value of crude oil sold 63,580,960
Other incomes 20.000
63,600,960
Less: Expenses:
You are required to compute the chargeable tax taking the following into
consideration.
134
(1) The Petroleum Profit Tax rate is 85 per cent
(2) Royalties include N935,000.00 in respect of royalties on exported crude oil.
(3) The company is entitled to Petroleum Investment Allowance of N56,560.
(4) Annual allowance for the year is N43,580,463.
Solution
ADAMU PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED
Computation of Petroleum Profit Tax
1st January - 3ist December 1999
N N
Revenue
Fiscal Value of Oil sold 63,580,960
Other Incomes 20,000
63,600.960
135
Note: It is assumed that "other incomes" is incidental to petroleum Operation.
Recurrent expenditure is revenue expenditure.
Example
Zarewa Oil Company Limited is engaged in Petroleum Operation. The following
information is extracted from the books of accounts of the Company for the year ended
31st December, 2001.
Royalty allowable is 20% of the fiscal value of chargeable oil. For 2001 year of
assessment, compute
Solution
ZAREWA OIL COMPANY LIMITED
Computation of Petroleum Profit Tax
1st January - 3ist December 2001
136
N N
N
Fiscal value of Oil 110,300,000
Other Income 182,496
110,482,496
Administrative 5,592,000
Production 2,147,000
Intangible drilling 13,000,000
Royalties Allowable 22,060,000
Education tax 2/^ x 67,683,496 == 1,327127
44,126,127
Adjusted profit/Assessable Profit 66,356,369
Less Annual Allowance 24,550,000
Petroleum Investment Allowance 1,179,000
(A) CAPITAL ALLOWANCE 25,729,000
or 85%of66,356,369 = 56,402,913
Less 170% of Petroleum Investment Allowance 2,004,300
(B) 54,39S.613
Lower (A) or (B) 25,729,000
Chargeable Profit 40,627,369
Chargeable tax at 85% = 34,533,263
Example
Mangal Oil (Nigeria) Ltd. is an oil producing company. Crude oil lifting for the 2001
accounting period were at the rate of 4,000 barrels per day The company confirmed that
95 per cent of the crude oil lifted was exported while the remaining 5 per cent was sold in
the home market (i.e. domestic sales). Other relevant details are:
(a) Gross posted prices of crude oil of 35°was N20.55 and it had been agreed with
the Federal Government that for every degree decrease in the API gravity of Crude
exported, the posted price was to be reduced by 11 kobo. The API gravity of Crude Oil
exported was 30°.
N N
137
Less Production Cost 584.000
Transportation 1,500.000 2,084,000
25,364,000
Deduct:
Salaries 500,000
General Overheads 70,000
Bank Interest/Charges 75,000
Interest on bills payable 95,000
Interest on loans from Subsidiary Company 160,000
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 25,000
Depreciation 1,450,000
Royalties & Producing rents 6,500,000
Non-producing rents 60,000
Customs duties 30,000
Harbour dues 24,000 8,987,000
16,377,000
(c) The company had capitalized intangible drilling costs amounting to N1,500,000.
(d) Royalties on domestic sales were N92,000.
(e) Capital allowances for the year were:
Petroleum Investment Allowance N1,000,000
Annual N700,000
Balancing charge 14,000
(f) Capital allowance brought forward from previous years were N250,000.
For the purpose of this exercise, assume that petroleum profits both from export and
domestic sales are taxable at 85 percent and all calculations should be made to the
nearest naira.
Solution:
MANGAL OIL NIGERIA LTD
Computation of Petroleum Profit Tax
1st January - 3ist December 2001
138
Actual gravity of crude 30°
Reduction in gravity 5°
De-escalation =50x11k (0.55)
Adjusted posted Price N20.00
139
(iii) Chargeable Profit 15,969
(iv) Assessable and Chargeable Tax at 85% 13,573,650
(v) Educational Tax 2% of N17,919,000 = N358,380
Notes;
(1) The fiscal value of the oil is greater that the sales value, if it were lower we would
have taken the sales figure per the accounts.
(2) "New producing rentals" is considered as mistake which should have been "non
producing rentals".
Example
Tankos Petroleum Production Co. Ltd., has been in business for many years. It’s Profit
and Loss Account for the year ended 31st December, 2001 showed the following:
Sales N N
Closing Stock 34,000,000
1,000,000
35,000,000
140
Notes:
(1) Interest on loans from a subsidiary (N2,000,000) is included in the loan
interest of N3,400,000.
(3) Harbour dues N200.000, Customs duties N300,000 and Dead rent
N150,000 are included in the N7,000,000 charged to the account.
(4) Intangible drilling expenditure incurred during the year N2,650,000 has
been capitalized as Petroleum expenditure.
You are required to prepare the adjusted profit of the company for the purpose of
Petroleum Profit Tax.
Solution:
TANKOS PETROLEUM PRODUCTION CO. LTD.
Computation of Petroleum Profit Tax
1st January - 3ist December 2001
N
Profit per accounts 11,390,500
Add Disallowable charges:
Stamp duty on debentures 20,000
Depreciation 5,000,000
6,410,500
Less Intangible drilling expenditure 2,650,000
Adjusted Profit 13,760,500
APPORTIONMENT OF EXPENSES
Where examination question gives different tax rates for local and exported crude oil,
then expenses should be apportioned between the two sources based on the number of
barrels. Some expenses, of course, my be identified with a particular market and therefore
should not be apportioned but allocated to the particular source of revenue.
141
Example
OLA Oil Company Limited is engaged in Petroleum Operations. The following
information are extracted from the books of accounts of the company for the year ended
31st December, 2001.
142
Solution
OLA OIL COMPANY LIMITED
Computation of Petroleum Profit Tax
1st January - 3ist December 2001
262,400,000
Miscellaneous Income 500,000
(2) Total Income 262,900,000
143
Less 170% of Petroleum Investment Allowance
2,295,000
(B) 210.92466
Lower of (A) or (B) 13,935,000
(5) Chargeable Profit 231,511,078
(6) Assessable Tax at 85% 196,784,416
(8) Chargeable Tax (from 1995 same as Assessable tax) 196,784,416
Education Tax 2% of N245,446,078 N4,908,922
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
In the first year the accounting period of an oil producing company is deemed to
commence on the day the company first makes a sale or bulk disposal of chargeable oil
under programme of continuous production and sales, to 31st December of that year.
For subsequent years it is a period of one year commencing on 1st January of that year
and ending on 31st December of the same year. In the year of cessation, it is from 1st
January of that year to the date of Cessation of business.
PAYMENT OF PPT
Petroleum Profit Tax is payable in advance. Every company engaged in petroleum
operation is obliged to submit a statement of its estimated PPT liability for the accounting
period, within 2 months of the commencement of the accounting period.
(3) The final installment of tax will be the amount of tax assessed for that accounting
period less all installments paid on accounts and is due and payable within 21
days after the service of notice of assessment of the tax for such accounting
period.
144
month of the service of such demand note, the Board may proceed to enforce
payment.
(3) The penalty imposed will not be deemed to be part of the tax paid for the purpose
of the provisions of the Act other than those relating to the enforcement and
collection of any tax.
Where there is an integrated oil and gas operations, oil profits will be separated and taxed
under PPTA, and all expenditure pipeline are to enjoy the following incentives effective
1st January 1998 :
145
d. Interest paid on loans for gas projects is to be deducted in computing taxable
profit, provided prior approval of the Federal Ministry of Finance was obtained.
e. Dividends paid during the tax holiday periods are exempted from tax.
Gas Exploration
Gas exploration is an upstream operation and therefore taxable under PPT Act 1959. Gas
exploration involves operations necessary to separate gas from the reservoir into useable
form at utilization or designated custody transfer points, either through pipeline or
tankers. This operation is to help reduce or completely eliminate gas flaring.
The fiscal incentives approved in 1992 under the Associated Gas Fiscal Arrangement are
reviewed as follows:
1. All investments necessary to separate oil and gas from the reservoir into
Its usable products is considered part of oil field development.
The provisions of the Finance Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions Decree 1999 regarding
a crude oil producing company which is under a "production sharing contract are"
1. Such companies will continue to claim and be granted "Investment Tax Credit3""
as a tax offset in accordance with such contract.
2. The rate of ITC is 50% flat rate of chargeable profit for duration of the (PSC).
3. Investment Tax Credit is deducted from assessable tax" to arrive at ^ax payable".
2. The "Petroleum Investment Allowance" on all capital investment for natural gas
liquids (NGL) is increased from 15% granted to gas utilization companies under
CITA to 35%. This provision in the 1999 Budget has not been enacted by the
Finance Decree 1999.
3. Gas transferred from NGL facility to the gas-to-liquid facilities are to be at zero %
PPT and zero % royalty as stated in 1998 Budget (as applicable to gas utilization
146
undertakings).
147
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
ON PETROLEUM PROFIT TAX
Introduction:
Chartered Accountants who qualified through the old examination syllabus would, on
taking up appointment with an oil producing company discover that the petroleum profit
tax practice is much different from what he studied. The difference is due to a document
called the "Memorandum of Understanding" (MOU) signed by the Federal Government
and each of the oil producing companies.
(i) To enhance crude oil exports by giving incentives to the oil companies to
lift the NNPCs share of the crude oil which the corporation could not sell.
(ii) To encourage investments in exploration and development activities and
in the area of enhanced oil recovery and gas utilization activities.
The Incentives
Apart from giving tax offsets, (to be dealt with later), the incentives to the oil producing
companies which are a parties to the MOU are:
1 Guaranteed Margin:
NNPC Crude Oil $ 1.15 per barrel
Own Crude Oil $2.30 per barrel
Maximum notional technical cost $2.50 per barrel
2 Where in any year the company's actual technical cost per barrel is equal to or
exceeds $1.50 per barrel, the following guaranteed margin and notional technical
cast will apply:
Guaranteed Margin:
NNPC Crude $1.25
Own Crude $2.50
Maximum notional technical! cost $3.50
148
"Actual technical cost" is otherwise called "actual production cost" and is made up of two
components:
2 Capital investment costs which qualify for expensing for PPT calculation (T)
a Exploration Drilling Costs
b 1st and 2nd Appraisal wells
c Intangible Drilling and Development Costs
d Capital allowances
Actual technical cost per barrel is therefore obtained by summing up these expenses and
dividing by the number of barrels produced during the year.
Government Take
The term "governments take" is defined as petroleum royalty and PPT payable to the
Government.
Under the MOU the petroleum profit tax is to be computed on the lower of:
(i) Computation under the PPTA 1959 as amended, which uses Official
Selling Price (OSP) in replacement of posted price, and
(ii) Computation using "Offset pricing formula".
The offset pricing formula imputes the notional figures stated above under the incentives,
into the PPT computation in an attempt to ensure that the company earns the minimum
margin also specified above.
149
TR = PPT tax rate (85%)
OT= Tax Offset
RP<$23
For realizable prices below $23 per barrel, the K factors are to be computed using the
under noted "Self -Adjusting Mechanism" to restore the desired guaranteed notional
margin.
K = 1.1364 (1-M+0.15Fc)
RP
Where
RP < $12.50
The following mechanism is applied for establishing the guaranteed notional
margin for realizable prices less than $12.50:
For:
Company's share applicable
Realizable Price to price range
in the Range FC== $2.50 = $3.50
0 -< $5.00 a1 =0.30 0.365
$5 -<10.00 a 2 =0.22 0.263
$10-<12.50 a 3=0.11 0.131
150
Example
If the Realizable Price is $12.50 and Notional technical cost is $3.50, M the guaranteed
margin is computed thus:
M= (1 -_3_50) (5x0.365+5x0.263 +2.50x0.131)
12.50)
Example
Eganza Petroleum Plc. sold the following blends of Crude oil from its equity share:
Bonny Light 200,000 bbis
Bonny Medium 150,000 bbis
Qua Iboe Light 100,000 bbis
Realizable prices advised by the NNPC were:
Bonny Light $20 per barrel
Compute the Offset value of the Crude oil. The exchange rate for $1 = N80 company's
production is on-shore.
Solution
(i) Calculation of K factors:
K = 1.1364 (1 -M+0.15FC)
RP
Bonny Light = 1.1364 (1 - 2.30 + 0.15 (2.50)
20
= 1.1364x0.86625 = 0.9844
Bonny Medium =1.1364 (1-2.30 + 0.15 (2.50)
19
= 1.1364x00.8592 == 0.9764
Qua Iboe Light == 1.1364 (1-2.30 + 0.15 (2.50)
18
= 1.1364x0.8514 = 0.9675
151
Bonny light = 0.9844 [(1-0.20) x 0.85 + 0.20]
= 0.9844 [0.88] = 0.866
Bonny medium = 0.9764 x 0.88 = 0.859
Qua Iboe light = 0.9675 x 0.88 = 0.51
Tutorial Notes
1 Royalty rate used is 20%
2 PPT rate used is 85%
3 In effect the K factors of
Tax Offsets
The MOU has given the oil companies two tax offsets namely:
1 Capital investment relief
2 Reserve additional bonus
152
T2 = The following costs which qualify for expensing for PPT calculation and
Capital Allowance:
1 Exploration Drilling Costs
2 1st and 2nd Appraisal wells costs
3 Intangible Drilling costs
4 Capital Allowances
Example
Shell oil Pic operates an NNPC/Shell Joint Venture with participating interests of 60/40.
During the year total oil production amounted to 180 million barrels. Actual technical
cost per barrel amounted to $3.80 out of which capital investment cost is $1.65 per barrel.
LIBOR rate is 15%. Compute capital investment tax offset.
Solution:
Shell Oil Plc.
Calculation of Capital Investment tax Offset.
Formula = 10% [ LIBOR + 1%) x 0.80 T2] x Equity production
= 10% [(15% + 1%) x 0.80 (1-65)] x 72 million barrels
= 0.10 (0.16x 1.32) x 72,000,000 = $1,520,640
NNPCs Share
0.10 (0.16x 1.32) x 108.000,000bbls = $2,280,960
Ultimate Recovery is the sum of "Proven" (P1) and "Probable" (P2) crude oil and
condensate reserves. It is calculated for each year in tranches determined by reference to
the Addition/Production Ratio (R) where
R = UR at end - UR at beginning
Annual Production
For
1-<1.25 X1 = $0.10
153
1.25<1.50 X2 = $0.25
1.50-< 1.75 X3 = $0.40
1.75 > X4 = $0.50
Bonus given on the excess over 1 in tranches of 0.25
Bonus = [ R1 X1 + R2 X2 + R3 X3 ) Pe
where R = Incremental reserve addition/production ratio
X = Bonus rate for various values of R
P=Annual production
e = Equity ratio
Example
SISCo Oil Company Ltd operates a joint venture with NNPC in a participating ratio of
70% NNPC and 30% SISCO. The joint venture operates three producing oil fields and
during 1999 the production from the fields were as follows:
Field Quantity
A 100 million barrels
B 150 million barrels
C 200 million barrels
Reserves at fields
end of the year Beginning of the year
(million of barrels) (million of barrels)
Proven (P1), Probable (P,) Proven (P1); Probabl (P2)
A 700 500 700 300
B 1760 1000 2000 600
C 540 200 340 100
Required: Calculate reserve addition bonus tax offset for 1999
Solution
Sisco Oil Company Ltd.
154
Field C = (0.25 x 0.10 + 0.25 x 0.25) x 200 x 0.30
= (0.025 + 0.0625) x 60
= $5,250,000
Example
Port-Harcourt oil company V Ltd is an operator in a joint venture with the Nigerian
National Oil Corporation (NNPC). NNPC interest in the venture is 60% while the
company has 40%. The following data relate to the venture for the year ended 31st
December 1997:
155
Field A 5 million barrels
Field B 2.4 million barrels
Field C 5 million barrels
Required: Compute
a Government Take
b Revised Government Take
c Petroleum profit tax liability
Solution
PH Oil Company
(a) Royalty $
156
Government Take: N
Royalty 2,974.8000
PPT 12,426.7875
Total 15,401.5875
(b) Revised Government Take computation is by the Offset pricing formula and
before that is done, the applicable notional guaranteed margin and notional technical cost
must be determined. So find out first the actual technical
cost per barrel;
T1 = Operating expenses N14. 00m
Admin & general 78.00m
Customs duties 00.86m
Non-producing rentals 00.14m
93.00m
T2 = Exploration Costs 60.00m
Appraisal wells (1&2) 13.25m
1DDC 52.00m
Capital allowances 43.20m
261.45m
Divide by N80 to $ = $0.26 per barrel which is less than $1.50 per barrel. Therefore
applicable:
Guaranteed margin:
Own Crude Oil $2.30 per bbl
Max notional technical cost $2.50perbbl
Net step is to compute K factor for the crude oil blend. Since the realizable price is not
below $23, the applicable K factor for the notional margin of $2.30 is 1.0042
157
Calculation of tax offsets:
Field A = 72 - 60 = 2.4
5
Field B = 85 - 70 = 6.25
2.4
Field C= 97 - 80 = 3.4
5
Bonus:
Field A 980,000
B 2,318,400
C 1,980,000
5,278,400
158
N80
Tax Offsets ( 5.2784m)
RGT $242.5486m
Tutorial Notes
In practice, royalty (on petroleum) and PPT are computed and payable in US dollars that
is why the MOU is expressed in US dollars. The RGT may be taken to naira to compare
with GT which was computed initially in naira.
1 The oil company will pay royalty and PPT on such crude oil to the
appropriate authorities - DPR for royalty and FIRS for PPT
Example
Exxex Oil is in joint venture with NNPC and lifted 1 million barrels of NNPCs equity
crude oil which NNPC could not lift. The crude oil type is Porcados Blend with a
realizable price of$10 per barrel and actual technical cost of $5 per barrel. The company's
operation is on-shore and total tax offset amounted to $810,000.
You are required to calculate
a Revised Government- Take, and
b Amount payable to NNPC by Exxex
159
Solution
Exxex Oil
(a) Computation of Revised Government Take
Workings
RGT = OP (0.85 x TC) - OT
OP = B x RP
B = K f (1-0.20) x 0.85 + 0.20
Since actual technical cost perbarrel is $5 (exceeds $1.50), the maximum notional
technical cost of $3,50 per barrel applies. Further, since realizable price is less than
$12.50 per barrel, the guaranteed notional margin is computed thus (instead of
$1.25)
= 1.1364x0.8455=0.96
B = 0.96 [(1 -0.20) x 0.85 + 0.20}
= 0.96 x 0.80 x 1.05 = 0.8064
Note it can be argued that since the computed margin is $1.02 per barrel, the guaranteed
minimum notional margin applies, i.e $1.25
$
Offset price = 1,000,000 x $8.06= 8,060,000
Less Technical costs Allowable:
160
Revised Government Take $3,000,000
Tutorial Note
Let's present the data in the form of Profit and Loss Account;
$
Realizable Price of Oil 10,000,000
Less Technical costs 5,000,000
Profit before Tax 5,000,000
Less Royalty/PPT (RGT) 3,000,000
Profit after tax 2,000,000
Less Profit + NNPC 1,020,000
($ 1.02 x 1,000,000)
Profit due to the company 980,000
Thus the MOU shares the profit on NNPC oil lifted and sold by the oil company between
the oil company and NNPC, an unfortunate situation.
Another point to note is that the oil company pays technical costs to the NNPC because
under the Joint Venture agreement, NNPC pays for its share of the technical costs of
producing its share of the oil.
Realizable Price: Realizable price is the "net back value" of the crude oil, which is the
FOB value of its yield. For its calculation see "Corporate Finance and Financial Strategy"
Packs.
Revenue Practice
The MOU was designed by NNPC. Accordingly, the staff of Federal Inland Revenue
Service is not conversant with the tax computations under the MOU. Therefore in
161
practice, when the MOU tax liability is lower than that computed under the Act, they call
the difference "MOU Credit" and deduct it from PPT computation under the Act to arrive
at the MOU figure.
The practice is however, wrong because RGT is the sum of "Royalties" and Petroleum
Profit Tax whereas Inland Revenue's computation under the Act is only Petroleum Profit
Tax Petroleum royalty is payable to Department of Petroleum Resources and not to FIRS.
Exercise
1. KT Oil Company Limited is engaged in Petroleum Operation. The following
information is extracted from the books of accounts of the Company for the year ended
31st December, 2001.
Royalty allowable is 20% of the fiscal value of chargeable oil. For 2001 year of
assessment, compute
2. Madugu Oil (Nigeria) Ltd. is an oil producing company. Crude oil lifting for the
2001 accounting period was at the rate of 5,000 barrels per day. The Company confirmed
that 95 per cent of the crude oil lifted was exported while the remaining 5 per cent was
sold in the home market (i.e. domestic sales). Other relevant details are:
(a) Gross posted prices of crude oil of 35°was N21.55 and it had been agreed with
the Federal Government that for every degree decrease in the API gravity of Crude
exported, the posted price was to be reduced by 11 kobo. The API gravity of Crude Oil
exported was 30°.
N N
162
24,372,000
Deduct:
Salaries 450,000
General Overheads 80,000
Bank Interest/Charges 65,000
Interest on bills payable 90,000
Interest on loans from Subsidiary Company 120,000
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 20,000
Depreciation 1,250,000
Royalties & Producing rents 7,500,000
Non-producing rents 50,000
Customs duties 40,000
Harbour dues 54,000 9,719,000
12,919,000
(c) The company had capitalized intangible drilling costs amounting to N1,200,000.
(d) Royalties on domestic sales were N82,000.
(e) Capital allowances for the year were:
Petroleum Investment Allowance N1,100,000
Annual N800,000
Balancing charge 45,000
(f) Capital allowance brought forward from previous years were N300,000.
For the purpose of this exercise, assume that petroleum profits both from export and
domestic sales are taxable at 85 percent and all calculations should be made to the
nearest naira.
163
1 Company's share (40%) of Crude oil produced and exported (Bonny light)
20,400,000bbls
Required: Compute
a Government Take
b Revised Government Take
c Petroleum profit tax liability
164
CHAPTER EIGHT
PIONEER COMPANIES
165
5. Specify the product and by-product (where this is not a pioneer product) to be
produced, the estimated quantities, and the values of the product and by-
product during the first year from the production day;
6. Give particular of loan and share capital of the company including the dates of
issue and the sources of the capital;
166
a. Where the value of the qualifying capital expenditure is
less than N50, 000 for an indigenously controlled company
and N150, 000 for other.
b. Actual production day is more than one year later than
stated in the original application
c. On the application of the pioneer company itself
d. Where any condition laid down by the minister is not
satisfied
Where the pioneer certificate is cancelled, the effective date for the cancellation
shall be the production day (the pioneer date) or the last anniversary thereof, whichever is
the later.
The effective date of cancellation shall be:
a. Where the company has been in operation as a pioneer company
for a period of less than 1 year after the pioneer date, then the
effective date of cancellation shall be the pioneer date. i.e. is it
assumed that the certificate was never granted.
b. Where the company has been in operation for not less than 1 year
after the pioneer date then the effective date of cancellation shall
be the last anniversary of the pioneer date.
Illustration
Determine the date of cancellation of the following pioneer certificates:
1. Asaku limited was granted a pioneer status on 1st May, 2000 but had this
cancelled on 29th March 2001.
2. Ashamu limited was granted a pioneer status on 1st May, 2000 but had this
cancelled on 29th March 2003.
Solution
167
The tax relief period may at the end of the three years be extended for
a. A period of one year and thereafter for another period of one year
commencing from the end of the period of extension
b. For one period of two years
c. If the company is established in a disadvantaged rural area the maximum
period shall be 7 years.
In ascertaining the loss for any accounting period the Board may only allow
reasonable amounts in respect of:
(2) Interest, agency, and service charge paid to a shareholder or any one
controlled by the shareholder.
168
When a loss has been so ascertained the board will issue a certificate. Losses
incurred in any year or year of the tax – free period must be netted off against profits of
the other periods of the tax-free period, and only the “net” loss can be carried forward the
post-pioneer period, which is carried forward to the new business”.
Losses carried form the pioneer period to the “new business” can only be set-off
against the total profits of the first year of the new business. Where the net loss exceeds
the total profits of the new business in the first year, such unrelieved loss cannot be
carried forward to the second year of the new business and will therefore lapse. This is
because there is no provision that that the net loss of the pioneer period is deemed to be
incurred by the company in its new trade or business. The “net” loss as explained is
deemed to be incurred on the first day on which the new business commenced.
The normal relief and restrictions apply to losses incurred in the new business and
such losses may be carried forward up to the maximum period of four years.
169
Step 7: Capital allowance obtained in step 6 above is used to reduce the assessable
profit obtained in step 4 above to arrive at the taxable profits for the
relevant tax years
Step 8: Compute tax payable by applying the rate of company income tax on the
taxable profits obtained in step 7.
Example 1
Eilon Nigeria Ltd was granted a pioneer certificate with production day given as
1st July 1991. The following information was extracted from the company’s records.
[
N
Accumulated profit as at 30th June 1994 94,000
Capital expenditure incurred up to and including year
Ended 30th June 1994 as Certified by the Federal
Board of Inland Revenue:
Industrial buildings 56,000
Non-industrial buildings 22,000
Plant and Machinery 158,000
Motor vehicles 60,000
Plantation 142,000
The trading result for the year ended 30th June 1995 is as follows:
Net profit was N172, 000 after charging depreciation N42, 000 and with holding
tax on rent included in expense was N10, 500. Extension of the initial pioneer period was
not sought nor granted.
You are required to compute the tax liability of the company for the relevant years of
assessment.
Solution
Eilon Nigeria Ltd
The Pioneer period will include the first 3 years of the business transaction. It
should also be noted that the amount of N92, 000 accumulated profits has been exempted
from tax.
Pioneer period ended 30th June 1994 and from 1st July 1994 a new business is
deemed to have commenced.
170
Eilon Nigeria ltd.
Commencement of new Business
It should be noted that the basis period for 1994 is 6 months, therefore, the annual
allowance granted is one half of the annual rate which means what ever is the amount of
the annual allowance you divide by 2 to get the 6 months. Furthermore, all the assets
bought during the pioneer period, that are said to be the qualifying capital expenditure of
the company are deemed to have been purchased on 1 st July 1994, which is the first day
of the start up of the new business after the pioneer period.
171
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT 1994
N
Adjusted profit 6/12x N224, 500 = 112,250
Less
Capital allowance 113,833
Relieved 112,250 112,250
Total Income 0
Capital Allowance c/f 1,583
Income Tax Liability NIL
It should be observed that there is no restriction on the capital allowance that may be
relieved for a manufacturing company. If it where a company that is not a manufacturing
business the restriction of 2/3 on capital allowance to be relieved would applied.
Example 2:
Metro pioneer Ltd, an indigenous controlled company commenced production on
1st January 1987 having been granted a pioneer certificate earlier on. It’s adjusted profits
(losses) are as follows:
N
172
Year ended 31st December 1988 25,000
Year ended 31st December 1989 (loss) (35,000)
Year ended 31st December 1990 50,000
Year ended 31st December 1991 45,000
Year ended 31st December 1992 50,000
Year ended 31st December 1993 70,000
Year ended 31st December 1994 45,000
Year ended 31st December 1995 80,000
Period ended 31st March, 1996 70,000
Its business cased with effect from 31st March 1996. During the above period it
incurred qualifying capital expenditure were as follows:
Note that:
(a) The company enjoyed the maximum relief period possible under the
provisions of the appropriate Act;
(b) It availed itself of its right within the commencement provisions of the
appropriate Act;
(c) That during the whole period it did not declare dividend, and
(iii) and the capital allowances for each of the relevant years of
assessment to 1993.
Solution
METRO PIONEER LIMITED
173
Pioneer profits: N
Year ended 31st December 1987 15,000
Year ended 31st December 1988 25,000
Year ended 31st December 1989 (loss) (35,000)
Year ended 31st December 1990 50,000
Year ended 31st December 1991 45,000
Tax exempted 100,000
1992 50,000
1993 70,000
1994 45,000
1995 80,000
1996 70,000
174
135,000 135,000
Bal b/d 100,000
Year
1992 Cost – production day 60,000
Additions -
February 1988 10,000
June 1990 10,000
January 1991 30,000
110,000
Annual Allowance:
Old Asset 8,800
New 10% (20,000-4,000) 1,600 14,400
W.D.V. 84,800
N
Capital Allowances
1992 30,800
1993 14,400
Illustration:
Adamu limited was granted pioneer status to manufacture pulp for the paper
industry with a production of 1 June 1993. The result of the business during the pioneer
period was as shown below:
175
1st June 1993 to 31st December, 1993 loss N340, 000
st st
1 January 1994 to 31 December, 1994 loss N150, 000
1st January 1995 to 31st December, 1995 profit N250, 000
st st
1 January 1996 to 31 may, 1996 profit N200, 000
During the pioneer period, the company was also involved in the importation of
hard paper, which was sold to the market. The result of the paper business shows the
following
you are required to determine the assessable profit for the relevant tax years.
Solution:
Adamu limited
Basis period for assessable profit
Pioneer status by location is granted to companies located in the rural area whose
location is not less than 20 Km from normal facilities. Such pioneer status is given by
way of a tax credit i.e. investment tax relief.
No facility at all 100 percent of tax payable
No electricity 50 percent of tax payable
176
No water 30 percent of tax payable
No tarred road 15 percent of tax payable
No telephone 5 percent of tax payable
The relief is granted for a maximum period of 3 years and it is not available for
companies already granted pioneer status by product.
EXERCISE
1. Jalingo Nigeria Ltd was granted a pioneer certificate with production day given as
1st July 1991. The following information was extracted from the company’s records.
[
N
Accumulated profit as at 30th June 1994 82,000
Capital expenditure incurred up to and including year
Ended 30th June 1994 as Certified by the Federal
Board of Inland Revenue:
Industrial buildings 62,000
Non-industrial buildings 34,000
Plant and Machinery 124,000
Motor vehicles 80,000
Plantation 183,000
The trading result for the year ended 30th June 1995 is as follows:
Net profit was N192, 000 after charging depreciation N31, 000 and with holding
tax on rent included in expense was N20, 500. Extension of the initial pioneer period was
not sought nor granted.
177
You are required to compute the tax liability of the company for the relevant years of
assessment.
Its business cased with effect from 31st March 1996. During the above period it
incurred qualifying capital expenditure were as follows:
Note that:
(a) The company enjoyed the maximum relief period possible under the
provisions of the appropriate Act;
(b) It availed itself of its right within the commencement provisions of the
appropriate Act;
(c) That during the whole period it did not declare dividend, and
178
(ii) The balance on the company’s section 17 Account.
(iii) and the capital allowances for each of the relevant years of
assessment to 1993.
3. Kawo limited was granted pioneer status to manufacture pulp for the
paper industry with a production of 1 June 1993. The result of the business during the
pioneer period was as shown below:
You are required to determine the assessable profit for the relevant tax years.
179
CHAPTER NINE
Education Tax
9.1 Introduction
The education tax decree 1993 introduced a new form of income tax to be assessed on the
assessable profits of companies effective 1st January 1993
The tax imposed on companies registered in Nigeria. The decree also established an
education fund into which the tax collected is to be paid and a board of trustees to
manage and administer the fund. The fund is to be disbursed to federal state and local
government educational institutions including secondary and primary schools, for the
restoration rehabilitation and consolidation of education in Nigeria.
The education tax rate is 2% of the assessable profit of a company registered in Nigeria.
The assessable profit of a company is to be ascertained under income tax or petroleum
profit tax principle as the case may be. The tax is an allowable charge against petroleum
profit tax computation.
The federal board of Inland Revenue is the assessing and collecting authority and is to
collect the tax along with companies’ income tax and petroleum profit tax.
The education tax is due within 60 days after the board has served notice of the
assessment on a company
The board of trustees is to comprise the chairman and such other number of persons with
considerable experience in business and financial management from the public and
private sector of the economy to be appointed by the president of the federal republic of
Nigeria on the recommendation of the minister of education.
180
The higher education portion is to be distributed between universities, polytechnics and
colleges of education in the ratio of 2:1:1.
Where an offence under the decree is committed by a body corporate or firm or other
association of individuals:
1. Every director manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body
corporate
2. Every partner or officer of the firm
3. Every person concerned in the management of the affairs of the association or
4. Every person who was purporting to act in any of the capacity as aforesaid.
If severally guilty of that offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished for the
offence in like manner as if he had himself committed the offence unless he proves that
the act or omission constituting the offence took place without his knowledge consent or
convenience.
A person who is guilty of offence shall on conviction be liable for a first offence, to a fine
of N10,000 or imprisonment for a term of three years and for a second and subsequent
offence to a fine of N20,000 or imprisonment for a term of 5 years or both such fine and
imprisonment. It should also be noted that the imposition of a penalty does not relieve a
company from liability to pay the tax due.
181
CHAPTER TEN
PERSONAL INCOME TAX
The law regulating taxation of individuals is contained in the income tax management act
1961 as amended by yearly finance acts or decree. The persons subject to personal
income tax law mean any individual or body of individuals including family and any
corporation sole, trustee or executor, having any income which is chargeable with tax
under the provisions of income tax management act.
Personal income tax is payable to the state in which the individual has his principal
residence. Each state has a board of internal revenue for the purpose of personal tax
administration and collection. Determination of where a person is resident is very
important in accounting for income tax to the relevant tax authority residence means a
place available for domestic use of the individual in Nigeria on a relevant day and does
not include any hotel, rest-house or other place at which he or she is temporarily lodging,
unless no more permanent place is available for his or her use on that day.
The relevant day refers to 1st January of any year. Thus where an individual is resident in
Lagos state on 1st January of a year, he will be deemed to be deemed to be resident in
Lagos state throughout that year and his income tax for that year is payable to Lagos state
even though his income may be derived from other states of the federation and he is
resident in another state later in that year.
The question of principal place of resident arises where an individual has two or more
places of residence on the 1st January of the year. In such a case, his tax is due to the state
in which he has his principal place of residence. The principal place is determined as
follows:
(a) an individual with no source of earned income other than pension in Nigeria,
the principal place of residence is that place in which he usually resides.
(b) An individual who has a source of earned income other than pension in
Nigeria, the principal place of residence is the place nearest to his usual place
of work
(c) An individual who has source or sources of incomes in Nigeria, the principal
place of residence is that place in which he usually resides.
In the case of foreign employment i.e. the duties of which are carried out outside Nigeria,
the place of residence of the employee is whichever the principal office of his employer
is situated on 1st January. The residence of an individual who takes up foreign
employment during the year is where the principal office of his employer is situated when
the employment commenced.
182
There are incomes that once the individual derived income from such sources, then
personal income tax is payable, they include:
1. employment
2. trade and business
3. profession or vocation
4. investment
5. pensions and annuities
6. royalties and rents
7. foreign incomes brought into Nigeria
8. agricultural profit
Remunerations from duties wholly or mainly exercised in Nigeria are taxable even if the
money is paid abroad.
183
8. remunerations from employment which;
(a) duties are performed on behalf of a non-resident employer
(b) the employee is not in Nigeria for 183 days or more in a year of
assessment
(c) the remuneration is liable to tax in any country
(d) the duties are performed outside Nigeria and the employer is in
Nigeria.
9. compensation for loss of employment
10. Rent allowance or housing allowance of not exceeding 28% of annual basic salary
subject to maximum of N100, 000 p.a. with effect from 1st January 2001 N15, 000
p.a.
11. Car allowance or transport allowance of N15, 000 p.a. or under. With effect from
1/1/2001 N20,000 pa. or under.
12. wages paid to gardeners and watchmen
13. cost of repairs and maintenance of premises and contents
14. Leave traveling allowance (of 10% annual basic salary w.e.f. 1/1/99).
15. entertainment allowance (of N6,000 p.a. or under w.e.f. 1/1/99)
16. touring allowance
17. uniforms overalls or protective clothing
18. Reasonable removal expenses, including a temporary subsistence allowance
where a change in place of employment necessitates a change in place of
residence.
19. gratuities payable to a public officer, and private sector N10,000 w.e.f. 1996
gratuity is not taxable
20. pension granted to any under the windows and orphans pension ordinance
21. wound and disability pensions granted to members of the armed forces
22. sums received by way of death gratuities or as considered compensation for death
or injuries
23. any sum withdrawn or received by an employee from a pension provident or other
retirement benefit fund, society or scheme approved by the joint tax board.
184
(b) Annual rental of any hired asset in the flat or building
(c) The cost of rapiers and maintenance to premises and contents is not
considered to be a benefit
(d) Wages of garners and watchmen are not considered benefits as their prime
function is to service and protect the company’s property
(e) Wages of stewards paid by the employer is taxable benefit. However, it might
be possible for a good case to be made that one steward is emplyed at the
company’s expense because of the amount of entertainment done and or
visitors accommodation
(f) Electricity paid by the employer or electricity allowance if given. A
reasonable average figure is to be used.
(g) Contents in the building or flat that is, furniture and fittings is taxable at 5% of
the cost or of the estimated market value at the date of occupation.
2. Car allowance or transport allowance in excess of N20, 000 p.a. in taxable.
3. If the employee has free use of a company’s vehicle and does not pay for
private mileages, benefits can be computed as follows: 5 percent of the cost of
vehicle, plus 5 percent of estimated annual running cost including drivers’
wages if the driver is specifically allocated to and works sorely for the
employee.
4. Excess rent allowance over 28 percent of annual basic not exceeding N100,
000 p.a. with effect from 1st January 2001. Excess rent over N150, 000 p.a.
5. Meal subsidy or meal allowance en excess of N5, 000 p.a. effective date 1st
January, 1999.
6. Utility allowance in excess of N10, 000 p.a.
7. Entertainment allowance in excess of N6, 000 p.a.
8. leave grant in excess of 10% of annual basic salary
Incomes may be classified under two groups earned incomes are incomes derived from a
trade, business, profession, vocation or employment carried on or exercised by the
individual and a pension derived from previous employment.
Unearned incomes are derived from other sources not included in the earned sources.
They are mainly incomes from investment e.g. dividends, interests and rents. Incomes
from royalties are also unearned incomes. The profit of a sleeping partner is unearned
income because he does not take active part in producing the profit.
Incomes, generally taxable in Nigeria are those derived from, accrued in or brought into
Nigeria.
185
Interest is deemed to be derived from Nigeria where.
1. there is a liability to payment in Nigeria of the interest, regardless of what
form the payment takes and whatever the payment is;
2. the interest accrues in Nigeria to foreign company or person regardless of
whichever way the interest may have accrued.
Basis period
The basis periods for personal tax rate as follows:
Source of income basis period
Employment actual income received in the year of
Assessment.
186
10.5 Total income
The computation of total incomes of an individual is similar to that of a company.
There is one provision relating to losses not found in the company tax law and it is that
where land and building are let by an individual for the purpose or producing income and
there is a loss. That is, the allowable expense exceed the income from the property, the
loss may be treated as a loss from trade or business and therefore relieved against that
source of income.
187
The allowance is not granted for a female child who is married
A widow who remarries is entitled to the allowance for children born for her late husband
If the husband claims the allowance the wife cannot; usually the allowance is not granted
to a married woman unless there is evidence that she is the one maintaining the child or
where she is a widow
The allowance ceases on the child attaining the age of 16 or on graduation from an
educational or apprenticeship establishment
Child’s income below N2, 500 is used to reduce the allowance.
Personal reliefs are given for the tax year and not on per annum basis. In other words the
relief cannot be apportioned on a time basis. Further the reliefs are given based on
circumstances existing as at 31st December last. The reliefs are given as a deduction from
total income to arrive at chargeable or taxable income.
The chargeable income of an individual was taxable at the following rates, from 1 st
January, 2001.
188
Income tax rate
N1 - 30,000 5%
30,001 - 60,000 10%
60,001 - 110,000 15%
110,001 - 160,000 20%
Over N160, 000 25%
With effect from 1st January 1998, anyone who earns N30, 000 p.a. or below is exempted
from income tax.
Example
Magama commenced trading in Abuja as a wholesaler, supplier of cosmetics. His
accounts are made up to 31st march each year and the adjusted profits for the first two
accounting periods were:
His profit and loss account for the year to 31st march, 2001 showed;
Salaries 7,320 gross profit 20,753
Rent 1,780 bank interest 30
Electricity 476
Bad debts 623
Trade expenses 1,549
Depreciation 225
Loan interest 700
189
Net profit 8,110
20,783 20,783
Magama is married with 2 children, the first aged 17 and the last aged 13, the first child’s
has his school fees paid as N500. for the year. He also has life assurance policy with a
capital sum assured of N20,000 on which he pays an annual premium of N1, 500. he
maintains his widowed mother with N300 per month.
Solution
MAGAMA
COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED PROFIT
190
1999 first 12 months 1/10/98 - 30/9/99
N4,200 + 6/12 X N13,600 = N11,000
2000 preceding year (31/3/99)
6 month but we repeat the 2nd year tax = N11, 000
191
MAGAMA INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT
Earned income
Profit trade 3/6 X 4,600 2,100
Less capital allowance 304 1,796
Less reliefs
Personal (5,000 + 20% of 1,796) 5,359
Children allowance N2,500 x 2 5,000
Life assurance 1,500
Dependent relative 300 12,159
Excess of relief over income 9, 067
Less relief
Personal (5,000 + 20% of 10,711) 7,142
Children allowance N2,500 x 2 5,000
Life assurance 1,500
Dependent relative 300 13,942
Chargeable (3, 231)
Less relief
Personal (5,000 + 20% of 13,439) 7,688
Children allowance N2,500 x 2 5,000
Life assurance 1,500
Dependent relative 300 14,988
Chargeable (1, 589)
192
Therefore income tax liability will be the minimum tax payable
1% of N13, 349 134.39
Less relief
Personal (5,000 + 20% of 13,439) 7,688
Children allowance N2, 500 x 2 5,000
Life assurance 1,500
Dependent relative 300 14,488
Chargeable (1, 049)
193
Exercise
1. Madugu commenced trading in Abuja as a wholesaler, supplier of cosmetics. His
accounts are made up to 31st march each year and the adjusted profits for the first two
accounting periods were:
His profit and loss account for the year to 31st march, 2001 showed;
Salaries 5,420 gross profit 25,753
Rent 2,560 bank interest 300
Electricity 1,000
Bad debts 600
Trade expenses 1,500
Depreciation 250
Loan interest 500
Net profit 8,110
20,783 20,783
Magama is married with 2 children, the first aged 17 and the last aged 13, the first child’s
has his school fees paid as N500 for the year. He also has life assurance policy with a
194
capital sum assured of N20, 000 on which he pays an annual premium of N1, 500. he
maintains his widowed mother with N300 per month.
195
CHAPTER ELEVEN
THE TAXATION OF NON RESIDENTS IN NIGERIA
11.0 Introduction
The concept of residency chiefly determines the extent to which the income of a taxpayer
would be subjected to tax. It also determines the scope of deductions that may be allowed
for the purpose of computing tax liability. In Nigeria, the premises on which a resident
company or individual is exposed to tax differ from that of a non-resident. Whereas a
resident is assessable to tax on the global income irrespective of whether or not he has
branches outside Nigeria, a non-residents principally charged to tax on the income
derived or received in Nigeria. The resident tax payer is liable to tax on the income or
profits “accruing in, derived from, brought into or received in Nigeria.
In respect of a resident individual who is employed liability to tax is based on the place of
residence while income or profits from any trade, business, profession or vacations
chargeable to tax irrespective of the period such was carried out in Nigeria.
A non- resident becomes liable to tax from the day he commences to carry on trade or
business in Nigeria. He only becomes liable to tax on employment income when he
becomes resident.
In respect of an individual tax liability will arise in the state where he is normally
resident. Where he can be deemed to be resident in more than one state, then he is
subjected to tax in the state where he has his principal place of residence. For individual
the principal place of residence means
(a) his usual residence, where pension is only source of earned income
(b) the place nearest to his place of work, where the source of earned income is
other than pension
(c) His usual residence, where he has sources of unearned income.
196
Where there is a dispute between tax authorities as to the determination of the principal
place of residence, the joint tax board determines the tax jurisdiction. The usual
determining factor where there is a dual residency problem in practice is the source of
earned income.
Under the provisions of the companies income tax act, a branch of a non resident
company is treated as a full taxpayer in Nigeria and the income or profit derived by him
in Nigeria will be charged to tax.
The exceptions of this rule or the conditions under which a branch will not be subjected
to tax are:
(a) if the branch is used sorely for storage or display of goods or merchandise
(b) if the branch is used sorely for the collection of information
197
treated as allowable if they can be proved to have been wholly, reasonably, exclusively
and necessarily incurred for the business in Nigeria.
Fixed base of the business
The fixed base of a non-resident company is the place from where it carries on its
business or trade in Nigeria. The fixed base must be easily identifiable and must posses
some degree of performance. A fixed base will include:
1. facilities such as a factory, an office, a branch, a mine or an oil well;
2. activities such as building construction, assembly or installation, and
3. furnishing of services in connection with the activities above
Then an agency arrangement is deemed to have arisen. The profit deemed to have been
derived from Nigeria is the profit attributable to the business or trade or activities carried
on through the agent.
198
may not necessarily be subjected to tax in Nigeria. Where however the sale of
goods on behalf of the principal is on a regular basis, then the agent is deemed
to trade habitually in the goods and the profit derived there from is chargeable
to tax in Nigeria.
This is a trade or business or activity which involves a single contract for the surveys,
deliveries, installation or construction. For Nigerian income tax purpose, the profit from
such s turnkey project is considered as derived from Nigeria. Consequently, it is fully
chargeable to tax in Nigeria because no allowance would be given for the profit to be
divided into Nigerian and offshore.
A sales outlet would be taken to be a fixed base. Where a facility is exempted as a fixed
base but it is to be used for some other purposes other than those originally intended the
facility will qualify as a sales outlet and treated as a fixed base for the non-resident
company. Income derived or profit arising from a sales outlet is taxable.
Where the both the contracts awarded are to the same company, the profit on a contract
of supply will not be subject to Nigerian tax provided the prices reflect open market
situation. If the company is resident abroad, the liability to tax on the construction,
assembly or installation project will depend on the existence of a permanent
establishment in Nigeria.
i. for construction or assembly, the existence of a site for more than two months
constitutes a permanent establishment
ii. For installation a permanent establishment is constituted if the charge for the
installation exceeds 10 % of the sales price.
Any transaction that is not at arm’s length is a related party transaction. The provision of
the Nigerian tax law is that the relevant tax authority may make appropriate adjustments
to the profit of the taxpayer.
The following circumstances may constitute a transaction that is not at arm’s length.
199
(a) where there is a controlling interest in the Nigerian company
(b) The presence of a control of a Nigerian company may be exercised directly or
indirectly by parent company or any other company associated to it.
(c) The implication of conditions in the financial and commercial relationship by
the controlling interest
(d) The condition imposed by the controlling interest must be different from what
will be obtained between independent parties or in any open market situation.
(e) The relationship must have led to the transfer of goods and services at prices
not at arm’s length with the result that the profit declared for Nigerian income
tax purposes is understated.
The modalities for determining fair and reasonable percentage of the turnover of a non-
resident company, the policy for determining a fair and reasonable percentage is:
1. Where the activity carried on through the fixed base involves construction,
assembly or installation, or in the case of turnkey projects, the percentage of
the turnover to be adopted to determine the assessable profit is 10%. The
capital allowances are deemed to have been granted and at the current rate of
30% this gives an effective tax rate of 3% of turnover
2. Where the activity carried on through the dependent agent involves
consultancy, management, technical or agency services, the 10% withholding
tax is final tax.
If any Nigerian company which has paid or is liable to pay common wealth income tax in
a year of assessment is again due to pay or has paid or is liable to pay tax
under the companies income tax act or an individual under the personal
income tax decree for that of its profits, a relief from the tax payable shall be
due.
Double taxation relief is mostly available for tax payers who operate in a country with
whom Nigeria has a double taxation agreement. The relief is however also available
where there is no agreement.
200
Where There is an Agreement
Where there is a double taxation agreement between Nigeria and the home country of the
non-resident tax payer, the amount of relief available shall be determined by the
provisions of the agreement. Specifically, the following key information should be taken
under such arrangements:
201
Where There is no Agreement
Where there is no agreement, the arte of relief shall be computed as follows:
If the common wealth rate of tax does not exceed one-half of the Nigerian rate of tax,
the rate of relief shall be the common wealth rate of tax.
If the common wealth rate of tax exceeds one-half of the Nigerian rate of tax, the rate
of relief shall be the Nigerian rate.
If the common wealth rate of tax does not exceed the Nigerian rate of tax, the rate of
relief shall be the common wealth rate of tax.
If the common wealth rate of tax exceeds the Nigerian rate of tax, the rate of relief
shall be the amount by which the Nigerian rate exceeds one-half of the
common wealth rate.
Notes:
In computing the Nigerian Rate of tax and the common rate of tax the
following relationship is used:
Nigerian Rate of Tax = tax paid/tax payable
Total profit/ taxable profit X 100
General procedures for the computation of the tax payable of a tax payer with
foreign income would be achieved as follows:
1. Determine the global income of the tax payer by including the
income derived from abroad
2. Determine the taxable profit of such taxpayers. If it is a business,
add and deduct and allow capital allowance. If an individual, allow
personal relief to be claimed
3. Determine tax payable by applying the applicable rates of tax to
the taxable profit determine in (b) above. This represents the
202
Nigerian tax.
4. Calculate the Nigerian rate of tax by dividing the tax computed by
the taxable income i.e. dividing (c) by (b)
5. Calculate the common wealth rate of tax by dividing the tax paid
on the foreign income by the gross amount of the foreign income.
6. Compare the common wealth rate of tax with either one-half of the
Nigerian rate of tax or with the Nigerian rate of tax depending on
the tax position of the taxpayer. Using the rate earlier on discussed,
determine the rate of relief.
7. Compute the amount of double taxation relief by multiplying the
rate of relief obtained in (f) above by the amount of gross foreign
income
8. The amount of relief obtained above is deducted from the tax
liability computed in (c) above to determine the final tax payable.
Example
The Income of Salami Nigeria plc, for the accounting year ended 30th September, 1990
are as given below:
You are required to calculate the tax due in Nigeria and the net tax liability of the
company.
Solution N Tax
Profit from Nigeria 33, 200.00
Dividend gross (5,250 X 100/75) 7, 000.00 1, 750.00
Profit from all sources 40, 200.00
Example
The Income of Salami Nigeria plc, for the accounting year ended 30th September, 1990
are as given below:
203
Profit from trade in Nigeria 33, 200.00
Dividend (net) from Ghana 5, 950.00
You are required to calculate the tax due in Nigeria and the net tax liability of the
company.
Solution N Tax
Profit from Nigeria 33, 200.00
Dividend gross (5,250 X 100/96) 6, 198.00 248.00
Profit from all sources 27, 002.00
Illustration
Okpara Nigeria limited has investment in a foreign country with double taxation
agreement with Nigeria. For the year ended 31 September 1990. The following figures
are provided.
You are required to compute the company’s foreign tax credit and the income tax
payable.
Solution
Profit liable to tax
Profit derived from Nigeria 180,000
Less:
Capital allowances 10,000
Loss brought forward 120,000 130,000
Total Profit 50,000
204
Profit liable to withholding tax
Foreign dividend 31,000
Tax liability
Income tax N50, 000 x 30%= 15, 000
205
CHAPTER TWELVE
Sales proceeds X
Less allowable expenses X
Net sales proceed X
Deduct cost of acquisition X
Capital gains X
Capital gains tax 10% x X = X
Step1: Identify the sales proceed on the disposal of the chargeable asset
Step2: Deduct allowable expenses from the sales proceed to obtain the net sales
proceed
Step3: The cost of acquisition and other capital costs are then deducted from the
net sales proceed to obtain the capital gains
Step 4: Compute the capital gains tax liability by applying the capital gains tax
rate of 10% on the capital gains obtained in step 3.
Further, where a capital sum is received or derived from the action and listed below, such
events are taken as "disposition":-
(a) Compensation for loss of office or employment
206
(b) Settlement of a policy of insurance on the risk of any kind or damage or injury to, or
the loss or depreciation of assets.
(c) Forfeiture or surrender of rights, or for refraining from exercising rights.
(d) Consideration for use and/or exploitation of any asset.
(e) Amounts received in connection with or arising by Virtue of any trade, business,
profession or vocation, as opposed to loss of office or employment as in (a) above.
(f) Part disposal of asset, interest or right therein.
The market value of the asset disposed off may be used in place of actual sale proceeds in
the following circumstances
(a) Where the bargain is not made at arm's length.
(b) Where the consideration cannot be wholly or partly valued.
(c) Where the asset is acquired with loss of office or diminution of emoluments.
(d) Where the asset is acquired as trustee for creditors of the person making the disposal.
(e) Where acquisition or disposal is by way of gift (except for gift at death).
(f) Where the transaction is between connected persons.
(g) Where the asset is acquired by a creditor in satisfaction of a debt.
Capital gains tax is chargeable on disposal of assets on which capital allowance has been
claimed.
12.2.1 Options
The capital gains on the disposal of an option is the actual amount paid for the option
because no cognizance is given to its cost of acquisition
Note that where the subject on which the option was exercised is subsequently disposed
the cost for determining the capital gains should be actual cost of the asset and the cost of
the option.
Illustration
CA. sold an option on a piece of land at adaja village for the sum of N250,000 to Agai
who subsequently exercised the right by purchasing the land for the sum of N1,245,000.
You are required to compute the capital gains tax liability of CA. and the capital gains tax
liability of Agai in the event he sells the property later for N3.5.
Solution
207
Computation of capital gains tax
Sales proceed 250,000
Capital gains tax 10% 25,000
AGAI
Computation of capital gains tax
Sales proceed N3, 500,000
Deduct:
Cost of land N1, 245,000
Cost of option N250,000 N1,495,000
Capital gains N2, 005, 000
12.2.2 Debts
Capital gains will arise where an asset acquired in exchange for a debt is disposed. No
capital gains tax transaction will arise if the asset acquired in exchange for the debt is not
disposed. The capital gains chargeable shall be the difference between the amount of debt
and the value obtained on the disposal of the asset acquired in exchange for the debt.
Illustration
Musa collected a piece of land in exchange for the debt of N248, 000 owed. The value of
the land obtained in exchange was N200, 000. The piece of land was subsequently
disposed for N350, 000. You are required to compute the capital gains tax liability.
Solution
Computation of capital gains tax liability
Sales proceed 350,000
Less value of land 248,000
Capital gains 102,000
Note that no capital gains tax liability arises in the event the asset acquired in exchange is
not disposed. In a similar manner, the capital gains is not the difference between the sales
proceed and the value of the asset but the difference between the sales proceed and the
value of the debt.
The capital gain on the disposal of an incorporeal is the actual sales proceed on its
disposal. No cognizance is given to the cost of acquisition. The only allowable expense is
the legal cost of protecting such properties.
208
12.3 Allowable Expenses:
Expenses allowable in computing capital gains tax are those wholly, exclusively and
necessarily incurred on the asset or property in question, either for the purposes of
acquisition or disposal. Examples of such expenses are:
(1) Cost of acquisition in money or money's worth given by the new owner or on his
behalf.
(2) Incidental cost of acquisition.
(3) Expenditure incurred for the purpose of enhancing the value, state or nature of
the asset before disposal. The expenses must not have wasted away e.g. extension
is allowed while painting is disallowed.
(4) Expenditure incurred in establishing, preserving or defending the title or right
over the asset.
(5) Incidental disposal cost e.g.
- Cost of advertisement to find a buyer,
- Valuation costs
- Ascertainment of market value for the purpose of capital-gains tax computation.
(6) Fees, commission or remuneration paid for the professional services of any
Surveyor, Valuer or Auctioneer or Accountant or agent or legal adviser and cost
of transfer or conveyance (stamp duty inclusive).
A limited liability company will remit its tax liability to the federal Inland Revenue
service while an individual will remit its tax liability to the state internal revenue service.
It should also be noted that a chargeable gain will arise where upon the disposal of a
chargeable asset, the sales proceed on disposal exceeds the cost of acquiring the
chargeable asset disposed and all other incidental expenses to the disposal.
The principle in the concept of asset disposal involves the consideration that assets are
said to be disposed where any capital sum is derived from a sale, lease, transfer, an
assignment, a compulsory acquisition or any other disposition of asset. The disposal is
209
deemed to have taken place even where no asset was acquired by the person paying such
a capital sum.
Individuals
(1) The taxpayer and his/her husband or wife, the husband/wife of a relative
(brother,
sister, ancestor or linear descendant of the taxpayer or his wife)
(2) A trustee of a settlement and a settlor and any person who is connected
with the settlor.
(3) A partner and other partners and with the husband and wife or a relative
(brother, sister, ancestor or linear descendant) of any of them
Company:
(1) A company is connected with another company
(a) if the same person has control of both companies, or a person has control of
one and persons connected with him, or her and persons connected with him have
control of the other;
(b) If a group of two or more persons have control of each company, and the
group either consists of the same persons or could be regarded as consisting of
the same persons by treating (in one or more cases) a member of either group
as replaced by a person with whom he is connected.
(2) A company is connected with another person
(a) if that person has control of it, or
(b) if that person and persons connected with him together have control of
the company;
(3) Any two or more persons (or those acting on direction of any of them)
acting together to secure or exercise control of the company
210
Illustration
Amadi bought a house from her father in law for the sum of N560, 000. The original cost
of the house when it was constructed by chike was N148, 000. The current market value
of the building is N700, 000. What is the chargeable gain arising from the transaction?
Solution
Computation of chargeable gain
Market value 700,000
Less cost of acquisition 148,000
Chargeable gain 552,000
A x C
A+B
The general rule is that the cost of the part disposed is determined using the relationship
above. The implication of this relationship is tat the proposition that the sales proceed
bears to the market value of the whole asset is appropriated on the total cost of acquiring
the whole asset.
It is critical to make a distinction as between real partial disposal and disposing a part of a
group of asset. Where a two wing duplex is acquired but one of the wings is disposed at
some point such a disposal is deemed to be a partial disposal. On the other hand, where
an estate made up of four buildings is acquired but one of the buildings is subsequently
sold, this is not a partial disposal. The key issue in the two examples sited is that whereas
it is possible to easily identify the cost of the building within the estate because it is an
entity on its own it may not be easy to determine the cost of one of the wings of duplex
constructed together.
Illustration
Madam kwasau acquired a box of trinkets in Bonn during a trip in 1990 for N590, 000.
during 1999, she disposed off the necklace for N350,000. The remaining items in the box
were valued at N950,000. The cost of valuation was 5% while brokerage was paid at 2%
of sale. You are required to compute the capital gains arising form the disposal.
Solution
Computation of capital gains
211
Sale proceed N350,000
Less valuer’s fee N47,500
Brokerage fee 7,000
54,500
Net sale proceed 295,500
Deduct
Cost of acquisition
350,000 X 590,000
350,000 + 950,000 158,846
Capital gains 136,654
CGT = 10% of N136,654 = N13,665.
Illustration
Amaka is the owner of a block of flats which he built at a cost of N= 300,000 many years
ago. On April, 9th 2001 he sold a flat for N= 200,000; the market value of the unsold flat
is given as N= 1 million. The expenses of selling the flat amounted to N= 10,000.
Solution:
AMAKA
2001 Capital Gains Tax Computation
N
Sales proceeds 200,000
Less of cost of flat
212
chargeable gain accruing shall be reduced so as not to exceed the chargeable gain which
would have accrued if he had acquired the property for a consideration equal to the
amount of the debt.
Illustration
Kantudu gave his property with a market value of N= 12,000 for a loan of N= 14,000
from the bank, Kantudu defaulted and the bank disposed of the security for N=25,000.
What is the capital gains tax payable by the bank?
Solution
Sale proceeds 25,000
Less consideration for property 14,000
Chargeable gain 11,000
Capital gains tax 10% 1,100
If the cost of property were taken to be the market value of N= 12,000, the chargeable
gain would have been 13,000, but according to the principle above, the gain is restricted
to N=11,000.
In the initial assessment, no account will be taken of any discount for postponement of
the right to receive any part of the consideration and without regard for the risk that any
part of the consideration might be irrecoverable. If, however any part of the consideration
brought into account is proved to be irrecoverable, relief will be given either by way of
discharge or repayment of tax already paid.
213
Step 4: Compute the chargeable gain for each installment using the relationship
above.
Step 5: Compute the capital gains tax payable on each installment made for the
relevant tax years by applying the relevant rate of tax.
Illustration
Baba sold an antique material to mama. The sale proceed was N300, 000 to be paid over
6 equal half yearly installments starting from 1st march 198. The original cost of the
antique was N60, 000. Determine the capital gains and the relevant years of assessment.
Solution
Installment Date Tax year Capital gains Reference:
1 1/3/98 1998 40,000 (50X240)/300
2 1/9/98 1998 40,000 (50X240)/300
3 1/3/99 1999 40,000 (50X240)/300
4 1/9/99 1999 40,000 (50X240)/300
5 1/3/00 2000 40,000 (50X240)/300
6 1/9/00 2000 40,000 (50X240)/300
Illustration
On l5th June, 2001, Aman sold her property for N= 200,000 to Amma, the consideration
payable instalmentally as follows-
The initial cost of the property was N= 80,000 and all the instalmentals were received by
Aman.
Solution:
Sale proceeds N 200,000
Less Initial Cost 80,000
Chargeable Gains 120,000
214
50,000 x N=120,000 x 10% = N3,000
200,000
If for instance, the last instalmental went bad, the realized capital gains would be
N=150,000 N80,000 == N= 70,000 and the capital gains tax payable N= 7,000. It would
be expected that the relevant tax authority would refund N= 2,000 out of the tax paid in
2002.
Rollover relief is granted where the sales proceeds on the disposal of certain chargeable
assets is utilized in the acquisition of a new asset of the same class. The key benefit
where a roll over relief is granted is that the capital gain tax payable may not be paid
immediately. It may be fully deferred or only a portion of it may be deferred into the
future. This gives some cash flow advantage to the tax payer.
The significant of this limitation is that even if the sale proceed on the disposal of any
other chargeable asset is reinvested in the acquisition of another asset in the same class
no roll over relief is available.
215
Step 7: Compare the capital gain tax payable in step 6 above to the capital gain tax
that would have became payable if the rate of tax were applied on step 1.
Full roll over relief where no tax is payable after the relief is computed
Partial roll over relief where only a portion of the tax computed per step 1 is
immediately due
No roll over relief where the full amount computed per step 1 is immediately
due.
Where there is a full roll over relief, no capital gain tax liability is immediately due. The
full amount of tax computed is deferred into some future dates when the newly acquired
asset is eventually disposed.
Illustration
Abc limited disposed off its plant for N600,000 in 1997. The plant was actually acquired
for N250,000 in 1992. a new was plant was acquired to replace the disposed one within
eight mounts for N750,000. What is the amount of relief obtained by STG.
Solution
Computation of roll over relief for 1997 tax year
Sales proceed 600,000
Less cost of acquisition 250,000
Capital gains 350,000
Deduct the lower of
216
Amount roll over
Net capital gains nil
The above illustration shows that no capital gains tax is due. Meanwhile since the capital
gain on the disposal of the asset was N350, 000, capital gain tax liability at 10% should
have been N350, 000. But then, the grant of a roll over relief results in no tax payable.
The full N350, 000 has been deferred to the future since the capital gain of N350, 000 has
been fully rolled over.
This means that for a relief to be granted the taxpayer must invest nothing less than the
cost of the old asset disposed.
The implication of a partial roll over relief is that only a portion of the capital gain tax
payable is immediately due. The balance may be deferred to the future when the newly
acquired asset is subsequently disposed.
Illustration
Abc limited disposed off its plant for N600, 000 in 1997. The plant was actually acquired
for N250, 000 in 1992. A new was plant was acquired to replace the disposed one within
eight mounts for N540, 000. What is the amount of relief obtained by STG.
Solution
Computation of roll over relief for 1997 tax year
Sales proceed 600,000
Less cost of acquisition 250,000
Capital gains 350,000
Deduct the lower of
Capital gain tax upon disposal is N350, 000 being 10% of the capital gain of N350, 000.
upon the acquisition of another asset of the same class in replacement however, the net
217
capital gain has been reduced to N60,000. This means that the capital gain tax liability is
just N6, 000. This is because only N290, 000 of the N350, 000 has been rolled over.
Illustration
Abc limited disposed off its plant for N600, 000 in 1997. The plant was actually acquired
for N250,000 in 1992. a new was plant was acquired to replace the disposed one within
eight mounts for N200,000. What is the amount of relief obtained by STG.
Solution
Computation of roll over relief for 1997 tax year
Sales proceed 600,000
Less cost of acquisition 250,000
Capital gains 350,000
The implication of the above is that no portion of the capital gain has been rolled over.
The capital gain before and after is N350, 000. No relief is therefore available.
Carrying cost
Where an asset on which roll over relief has been taken advantage of is subsequently
disposed, the capital gain arising on the disposal is not the difference between the sales
proceed and the carrying cost.
The carrying cost of an asset is the difference between the cost of acquisition and the
amount rolled over.
The significance of the carrying cost of an asset is that the capital gain deferred upon
being grated roll over relief will eventually precipitate upon the disposal of asset.
Illustration
218
Abc limited disposed off its piece of land costing N350,000 for N780,000 in 1992. the
company immediately bought another piece of land for N800,000 in 1993 which was
subsequently disposed for N1,600,000 in 1998.
You are required to determine the amount rolled over and the capital gains payable in
1998.
Solution
Computation of roll over relief for 1997 tax year
Sales proceed 780,000
Less cost of acquisition 350,000
Capital gains 430,000
Deduct the lower of
219
Capital gains tax on assets situated outside Nigeria is chargeable on only the amount, if
any, received or brought into Nigeria by the owner. The charge is on all persons resident
in Nigeria, all Nigerian companies and all others that fall into any of the below:
(I) Individuals in Nigeria for temporary purpose only and not with any view or intent
to establish residence in Nigeria, and if the sums of periods for which he is present in
Nigeria in that year of assessment exceeds 182 days;
(II) Personal representative in Nigeria of a company whose activities are managed or
controlled outside Nigeria.
It should also be noted that where the asset is situated outside Nigeria; the time of
disposal is taken to be when the capital sum is received in Nigeria; and the assessment is
made when all amounts paid for use and enjoyment of the asset is repatriated to Nigeria.
Where separate consideration arc agreed for any two or more transactions contained in
one bargain, those consideration will be treated as altogether constituting an entire
consideration for the transaction and shall be apportionable between them accordingly
However, where such apportinment results in a lesser consideration than that agreed in
the bargain attributable to the disposal of the assets the separate consideration agreed in
respect of those assets will be deemed to be the consideration for disposal.
12.14 Asset Lost Or Destroyed - Full Application Of Capital Sum To Replace The
Asset:
Where capital sum is received by way of compensation for loss or destruction of the
asset, under an insurance policy or otherwise, and the amount is applied within 3 years, in
the acquisition of another asset in replacement of that lost or destroyed, the owner may
claim as follows:
(i) That the old asset is deemed to be disposed of at the cost of the asset, so that there
is neither a gain or loss;
(ii) and that the cost of the new asset be reduced by the gain in disposal of the old
asset.
Example
Air Nigeria Ltd. received N= 45m from an insurance company on 1st June in respect of
its aircrafts which crashed and which was purchased for N= 40m. A new aircraft of the
type destroyed was purchased on 28th December, 2001 for N= 50m.. Show the effect of
a capital gains tax on the transactions.
Solution:
Without the claim:
Disposal proceeds N45m
Cost N40m
Chargeable gain N5m
220
Capital gains tax at 10% N500, 000
With the claim made:
Disposal proceeds deemed N40m
Cost of acquisition N40m
Chargeable gain 0
New Aircraft cost N50m
Less Gain on old aircraft N5m
Net cost N45m
Whenever the new aircraft is sold, the deemed cost would be N45m^capitsd gains tax
purposes.
12.15 Partnership
When a partner transfers personal assets to a partnership, there is a disposal to the extent
that such asset becomes the property of the other partners, where, however, a new
partnership is formed from an existing one, no disposal has taken place.
Exemption and Relief;
The following gains are exempted from capital gains tax:
(a) Conveyance or transfer of an asset as a security for a debt and retransfer of the
asset on redemption of the debt.
(b) Gifts arising from death.
(c) Disposal of assets held as a nominee or trustee.
(d) Gains from disposal of government securities.
(e) Gains accruing from disposal of a decoration awarded for valour orgallant
conduct.
(f) Gains accruing from any superannuation, pension or provident fund (such funds
or Compensation or damages for any wrong or injury suffered by an individual in
his person or in his profession or Vocation.
(h) Compensation for loss of office is exempted up to N= 10,000, the excess is
chargeable.
(i) Gains accruing to Local and Native Authorities.
(j) Gains arising from disposal of interest in an insurance policy or a contract for
deferred
annuity where the person making the disposal is the original beneficial owner.
(k) Gains accruing from the disposal of an individual's only main residence or
dwelling house.
(m) Assets acquired by way of gift.
(n) Gains accruing to a diplomatic body which includes a diplomatic representative, a
foreign envoy a foreign consular officer and an employee of any foreign state.
(o) Disposal of land to an authority with compulsory power as to so acquire the land.
(p) Capital gains accruing to the following bodies: -
(1) An ecclesiastical, charitable or educational institution of a public
character.
(2) A statutory or registered friendly society
(3) Any trade union registered under the Trade Union Act.
221
(q) Gains from sale of shares and stocks.
The conditions for which the bodies mentioned under (p) are exempted are
(1) The gain is not derived from disposal of any assets acquired in connection
with any trade or business carried on by the institution or society
(2) The gain is applied purely for the purpose of the institution or society
where the organization disposes of its own property
(3) Where the property held in trust ceases to be so held, the trustee shall be
treated as if they have been disposed of and immediately re-acquired the
property for a consideration equal to its market value.
(4) if and so far as any of that property represents, directly or indirectly the
having accrued consideration for disposal of assets by the trustees, any
gain accruing on that disposal will be treated as not.
(q) Statutory Corporations or any company established by or under any law in
Nigeria for procuring goods for export or economic development of any part of Nigeria
are exempted from paying capital gains tax. The gain must not accrue from disposal of
investments and assets or other interest owned or possessed by the corporation in
connection with any trade or business carried on by it or on its behalf by some other
person or authority
(r) Disposal of currency.
(s) Disposal of tangible moveable property (chattle) whose value does not exceed
N1000 (sales value) in any year of assessment is exempted from capital gains tax.
No capital gains tax will accrue where the interest in right under any life policy or
contract for deferred annuity is disposed of other than realization as stated in the previous
is the original beneficial owner. Where the disposal is made by a person other than the
original beneficial owner, tax liability would accrue.
222
The claim for deferment of assessment must be made by the tax payer within six years of
disposal of the chargeable asset.
Example
Mr. OLA sold tangible moveable assets as follows:
A B C
N N N
Cost of acquisition 800 850 900
Expenses of sale 25 10 100
Disposal proceeds 990 1,060 1,500
Year of disposal 2000 2001 2,002
Solution:
MR. OLA
CAPITAL GAINS TAX ASSESSMENT 2000
N
Disposal proceeds 990
Less cost 800
Expenses 25 825
Gains 165
Gains exempted from tax since the sale proceeds are not more than N1000.
2001 ASSESSMENT
N N
Disposal proceeds 1060
Less cost 850
Expenses 10 860
Gains 200
Capital gains tax lower of
223
2002 ASSESSMENT:
Where a tangible moveable property of a small value is partly disposed of, the limitation
of tax to half the difference between the disposal proceeds and N= 1000 is multiplied by
the ratio.
A
A+B
In order to determine the portion relating to the asset sold. In the formula:
The same ratio is also used to ascertain the cost relating to the asset sold.
Example
Maikafu disposed of three quarters interest in his chattel for N= 700. The market value of
the one quarter retained was ascertained to be N= 500, The overall cost of the asset
sold was 600.
Solution:
Maikafu
N=
Disposal proceeds 700
Less cost 700 x 600 = 350
700 + 500
224
Capital gains tax liability N58.33
For the relief to apply, the old asset must be used only for the purpose of the trade
throughout the period of ownership, and the new asset must be brought into use in the
trade.
Example
Daikin Enterprises sold a molding machine for N2,800, and acquired a new one for
N=3,600. The old machine cost was N=2,000
N
Disposal proceeds: 2,800
Less cost 2,000
Where the disposal proceeds of the old asset is partly used in the replacement of the new
asset, then the roll-over relief would be proportionate to the proceeds used. For example,
if the cost of the new molding machine were N= 2,000, the position would be:
N
225
Chargeable gain 229
New molding machine 2,000
Less Roll-over relief 571
Deemed cost of new machine 1,429
Where the asset is used partly for business and partly for private use, the asset would be
apportioned between the two uses on time basis and the belief will apply to the part of the
asset used for the trade.
Roll-over relief does not apply to speculative buying and selling of assets.
Exclusion of Losses:
In the computation of chargeable gains, amount of any loss which accrues to a person or
company on the disposal of any asset is not deducted from other gains accruing to such
person or company on disposal of the balance of such asset.
Payment
Payment of capital gains tax must be made on or before 60 days from the date of
assessment.
Exercise
1. On l5th June, 2001, Amana sold its property for N= 300,000 to Amman, the
consideration payable instalmentally as follows-
The initial cost of the property was N= 120,000 and all the instalmentals were received
by Amana.
You are required to show the Capital gains tax for each year of assessment.
226
3. Abamu limited disposed off its piece of land costing N550, 000 for N980, 000 in
1992. The company immediately bought another piece of land for N950, 000 in 1993
which was subsequently disposed for N1, 800,000 in 1998.
227
CHAPTER THIRTEEN
VALUE ADDED TAX
13.0 Introductions
Germany was the first country to introduce this form of tax in 1919, and now term
the value added tax. It was implemented as “addition type” which means the tax base was
computed as the sum of wages and capital income. In 1937, France introduced
“production tax” with features similar to exercise duty tax. In 1948, the government
emended the tax to what it termed produce income base tax; this form of tax used the
credit mechanism thereby becoming closer to the present value added tax.
In Nigeria, the tax was introduced by Decree No. 102 of 1993; the decree also established
a VAT technical committee comprising the following members;
1. chairman of FIRS
2. all directors of the FIRS
3. a controller from the Nigerian customs service
4. three representatives of the state governments, who are
members of the joint tax board
The functions of the committees are;
1. to consider all the tax matters that require professional and
technical expertise and make recommendations to the
board
2. to advise the board on VAT matters
3. to attend to such other matters as the board may
The law also established the value added tax tribunal; this tribunal tries cases
that affect VAT matters. It has the status of federal high court and its judgment is
enforced as if it were the judgment of a federal high court.
The minister of finance is empowered to make rules regulating the practice and
procedures of the VAT tribunal and until such rules are made, the practice and procedure
of the federal high court apply. The judgment of the tribunal regarding the amount of vat
payable is required to be served on the vat-able person, and not withstanding that he has
appealed against it, the amount of vat is required to be paid within one month of
notification of the amount payable in accordance with the judgment.
Any party aggrieved by the decisions of the tribunal may appeal to the court of
appeal on giving written notice to the secretary of the vat tribunal. The notice and hence
the appeal, must be made within 30 days of the judgment of the tribunal and must set out
the grounds on which the decision is being challenged. Furthermore, on receipt of the
notice of appeal the tribunal’s secretary is required to compile the record of proceedings
and judgment of the tribunal and transmit them to the chief registrar of the court of
appeal.
The revenue generated from the tax is distributed to the governments in the
following manner;
1. State governments including the FCT, Abuja 80%
2. Federal government 20%
228
13.1 Taxable Goods
The following goods are taxable under the decree no 102 of value added tax in Nigeria.
They include;
1. all goods manufactured or assembled in Nigeria
2. all goods imported into Nigeria
3. all of second had goods
4. household furniture and equipment
5. petrol and all petroleum products
6. all mineral and other bottled water and other liquors
7. cigarettes and tobacco
8. textile clothing, carpets and rugs
9. all air crafts, aircrafts bodies and their spare parts
10. perfumes and cosmetics
11. soaps and detergents
12. minerals and mining
13. office furniture and equipments
14. electric materials of any description
15. such other goods that may be determined by the board
13.2 Taxable Services
The following services are taxable under the decree no 102 of value added tax in Nigeria.
They include;
1. All services rendered by financial institutions to their
customers
2. Accountancy services
3. The provision of report, advice or similar technical services
in such areas as
4. Legal services
5. Computer services
6. Services supplied by architect
7. Services supplied by land and building surveyors, quantity
surveyors e.t.c.
8. Services supplied by consulting engineers
9. Services supplied by auctioneers, estate agents and valuers
10. Services supplied by agents, including insurance agents
11. Services supplied by brokers
12. Services supplied by security companies and enterprises
13. Courier services
14. Services supplied by secretarial agencies
15. Repairs, alteration, processing or any other services provided
in connection with designated goods by designated
dealers.
16. Air travels and company car hire
17. All goods and services for repairs and maintenance of all
types of equipments.
229
18. Restaurant services supplied by a restaurant owners or
operators
19. Accommodation and all other services provided by a hotel
owner or operator including all services offered therein.
20. Entertainment services including plays and performances,
cinema shows and music concerts.
21. Letting of video tapes or any other audio visual records or
hiring, copying and rewriting of videos and similar
services
22. Telecommunications services including installation and
maintenance services
23. Services supplied in the course of altering, processing,
bottling, packaging of manufactured goods owned by
another person.
24. Any other services as may be prescribed by the board from
time to time as taxable services.
230
Generally, this is a comprehensive tax that is very difficult for tax payers to
avoid, and as it is presently it is one of the tax sources that generate a lot of revenue
for the government.
In determining the value of the goods and services the following should be
noted;
1. That for supply paid for in money, the value of VAT shall be
the amount so paid
2. For supply for a consideration not consisting money, the
VAT shall be the market value of the supply
3. For imports into Nigeria, the VAT value shall be the cost
insurance fright value plus any customs duty, excise duty,
other imports charges or levy, and commissions, packing,
transport and insurance costs.
Vat is intended to fall on the domestic consumer and is levied by means of an ad-valorem
rate on the turnover of all or a wide range of business after deduction of the cost of goods
and services purchased externally. Thus vats essential feature is to tax the input value
contributed by every firm at every state until a product is sold for final consumer. The tax
is levied on all stages of production and distribution including the retail trade. It is
charged on the price at which goods and services are paid for by one business to another
throughout the chain of production and distribution, but at every stage except that of the
retail consumer, the purchaser is allowed to offset the tax he has paid against the tax he is
due to account for, on his own sales. The end result is that, the final domestic consumer
pays a retail sales tax at a simple, proportional rate, unaffected by the number or variety
of the transactions at the earlier stages.
Illustration
Consider a manufacturer in Nigeria that produces and sells goods. Assuming he paid the
sum of N5 as vat on the goods he uses for his production. And assume that the cost of
what he is import is N100. He added value to the cost of production to the sum of N200
therefore, selling to the whole seller at N300.00. The invoice he sends to the whole seller
will be N315, the N300 plus the 5% VAT of N15.
Next, the wholesaler invoices to the retailer at N400 plus 5% VAT, which totals
N420. Finally, the retailer to the consumer at N500 plus 5% vat which is N525.
The VAT payable by the manufacturer will be the output VAT of N15 less the input
VAT of N5 to give the N10 VAT payable. For the wholesaler, the output VAT of N20
less the input VAT of N15 to arrive at N5. Then the retailer output VAT of N25 less the
input VAT of N20 to have N5.
You realized that the evasion of the value added tax is so difficult that from the
manufacturer to the consumer the value added tax is paid. It becomes self enforcing as
the invoice to send to the next stage of the production incorporates the 5% value added.
Therefore, if government will consolidate on the collection of this tax, a lot of revenue
will be generated for the country. What it takes for the government is closer supervision
and a review of the penalty attached to those that default. At the wholesale and retail
stages, you realize some deduction not remitted or complete no charging of the VAT.
This is because the penalties do not pass the payment of a fine of N5, 000 in some cases.
This amount has to be reviewed.
231
Value Price Vat Vat On
Added After Vat Import
Producer imports
Raw materials 100 5
Producer sells
Finished Goods 200 300 10
Wholesaler sells
To retailer 100 400 5
Retailer sells
To customer 100 500 5
400 20
Illustration
For the month of April 1990 the total purchases was N44, 000 and total sales at N72, 000.
Assuming the value added tax to be taken as 5%. You are required to give the input and
output procedure.
Solution
232
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. (1972): Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,
Journal of Public Economics 1 (1972), S. 323 - 338.
Alm, G.H. M. and Schulze, W. D. (1992): Why Do People Pay Taxes?, Journal of Public
Economics 48 (1992), S. 21 – 38.
Alm, G.H. M. and Schulze, W D. (1999): Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance
by Voting, Kyklos 52 (1999), S. 141 – 171.
Alm, B.R. Jackson und M. MCkee (1992): Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer
Compliance with Experimental Data, National Tax Journal 45 (1992), S. 107 – 114.
Buchanan J. (1975): The Limits of Liberty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1975;
deutsche Übersetzung: Die Grenzen der Freiheit, Mohr (Siebeck), Tübingen 1984.
Eide E (1994): Economics of Crime: Deterrence and the Rational Offender, North-
Holland, Amsterdam 1994.
Elffers, R.H. W. and Hessing D. J. (1987): The Consequences of Different Strategies for
Measuring Tax Evasion Behavior, Journal of Economic Psychology 8 (1987), S. 311 –
337.
Etzioni A. (1995): On Restoring the Moral Voice, in: A. Etzioni (ed.), Rights and the
Common Good: The Communitarian Perspective, St. Martin’s Press, New York 1995, S.
271 – 276.
Feld L. P. and Frey B. S. (2001): Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers are Treated,
erscheint in: Economics of Governance 2 (2001).
Feld L. P. and Tyran J. (2001): Voting and Tax Evasion: An Experimental Analysis,
mimeo, Universität St. Gallen, Januar 2001.
Frey B. S. (1986): Economists Favour the Price System — Who Else Does?, Kyklos 39
(1986), S. 537– 563.
233
Frey B. S. and Pommerehne W. W. (1993): On the Fairness of Pricing: An Empirical
Survey Among the General Population, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
20 (1993), S. 295 – 307.
Jöreskog K. G. and Van Thillo M. (1973): A General Computer Program for Estimating
a Linear Structural Equation System Involving Multiple Indicators of Unobserved
Variables, University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics, Research Report 73-5.
Kennedy J. F. (1962): To Turn the Tide: The Major Addresses and Statements of
President John F.
Kennedy, H. and Brothers, New York (1962): deutsche Übersetzung: Dämme gegen die
Flut, Econ, Düsseldorf/Wien 1962.
Parijs V. (1992): Basic Income Capitalism, Ethics 102 (1992), S. 465 – 484.
Parijs V. (1995): Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism,
Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995.
Pommerehne, A. H. and Frey B. S. (1994): Tax Morale, Tax Evasion and the Choice of
Instruments in Different Political Systems, Public Finance 49 (1994, Supplement), S. 52
– 69.
Akhitirov, A. (2003): Does Anyone Pay Taxes These Days? Pravda.Ru. November 19.
http://english.pravda.ru/printed.html?news_id=11303.
Anon. (2003a): Russia’s Richest Man Arrested on Fraud, Tax Evasion Charges. Yahoo!
News Asia. October 26. http://asia.news.yahoo.com/031025/afp/031025201623eco.html.
Anon. (2001a): Finance and Economics: Tax Beast. The Economist 358(8211): 71
(March 3).
234
Anon. (1998a): Russia’s Tax Revulsion. The Christian Science Monitor, March.
Baker, S. (1998): Russia: Tax Chief Targets Rich and Famous. Radio Free Europe, Radio
Liberty, June 5. www.rferl.org/nca/features/1998/06/F.RU.98060152350.html.
Bird, R. M. (1992): Tax Policy & Economic Development. Baltimore and London: The
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. and Marilyn R. F. (1975): The Public Finances, 4th edition. Homewood,
IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Cullis, J and Philip J. (1998): Public Finance and Public Choice. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Forbes, S. (2003): Where Communists Beat Capitalists. Forbes 172(2): 16, July 21.
Hall, Robert E. and Alvin Rabushka. 1985. The Flat Tax. Stanford: Hoover Institution
Press. KPMG. 2003. Doing Business in Russia (July).
McCaffery, E. J. (2002): Fair Not Flat: How to Make the Tax System Better and Simpler.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
235
McGee, R. W. (2004): The Philosophy of Taxation and Public Finance. Dordrecht,
London and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McGee, R. W. (1999): Why People Evade Taxes in Armenia: A Look at an Ethical Issue
Based on a Summary of Interviews. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy 2(2):
408-416.
McGee, R. W. (1993): Principles of Taxation for Emerging Economies: Lessons from the
U.S. Experience. Dickinson Journal of International Law 12: 29-93.
Musgrave, R. A. and Peggy B. M. (1976): Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 2nd
edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Myre, G. (1996): In Russia, Tax Police Take New Approach to Cash Crisis. Associated
Press, December 6. www.lubbockonline.com/news/120696/inrussia.htm.
Rabushka, A. (2002a): Tax Reform Remains High on Russia’s Policy Agenda. Hoover
Institution Public Policy Inquiry. May 22.
www.russianeconomy.org/comments/052202.html.
Rabushka, A. (2002b): Improving Russia’s 13% Flat Tax. Hoover Institution Public
Policy Inquiry. March 11. www.russianeconomy.org/comments/031102.html.
Rabushka, A. (2002c): The Flat Tax at Work in Russia. Hoover Institution Public Policy
Inquiry. February 21. www.russianeconomy.org/comments/022102.html.
Rabushka, A. and Pauline R. (1982): The Tax Revolt. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
Shleifer, A. and Daniel T. (2000): Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic
Reform in Russia. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
236
12. The Nigerian institute for oil palm research
13. The Nigerian institute for trypanosomiasis research
14. The Nigerian museum
15. The Nigerian red cross
16. The national youth council of Nigeria
17. National sports commission and its state associations
18. The Nigerian society for the deaf and dumb
19. The society for the blind
20. The Nigerian national advisory council for the blind
21. The associations or societies for the blind in Nigeria
22. Rotary international polio plus
23. National science and technology fund
24. Educational cooperation society
25. Paterson zochonis Nigeria technical education trust fund
237