Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09 Cerro Colorado March 2014 A4 4 Slides Per Page PDF
09 Cerro Colorado March 2014 A4 4 Slides Per Page PDF
• 25rockchip(surface)samplesreceived
Greenrockblindtest
• Allsamplesslabbedfortexturalanalysis BHPBilliton
• AllsamplesstainedforKͲfeldsparatCODES
• Wholerockdata:25wholerockanalysesfromALS
Chemex
• Epidotechemistry:154LAͲICPMSanalyses
(plus10discarded)from17samples
• Chloritechemistry:48LAͲICPMSanalyses
(plus46discarded)from10samples
• SWIRdata:50Terraspec analyseson25samples
MikeBaker,NathanFox,ElenaLournejeva and
LejunZhang
AMIRAP1060SponsorsMeeting– March2014
151562– epidoteͲchloritealtered AMIRAP1060– March2014 ConfidentialtosponsorsuntilDecember2015
plagioclaseͲphyricandesite ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 3
• MarioValdez
2km
• 25surfacesamplesprovided
• 6x9kmareasampled;including9kmͲlongWͲEsampletraverse
AMIRAP1060– March2014 197804– epidoteͲchloritealteredandesite AMIRAP1060– March2014
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 4 withsmallchloriteͲquartzveins ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 2
SamplelocationsͲ rocktype Sampledistribution– crosssection
W E
100m
2km
2km
Elevationvariesfrom150mto520ma.s.l.along9kmͲlongsampletraverse
AMIRAP1060SponsorsMeeting– March2014
AMIRAP1060– March2014 ConfidentialtosponsorsuntilDecember2015
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 8 6
ep dol ank chl, py
KͲFeldspardistribution Rockclassification
Moderatetostrong ThesamplesarelowͲKtomediumͲK
None rocks;highͲKcontentsarecaused
il
151562– Dacite
Weak ab
bypotassicalteration
K-fs
HighKandshoshonite
Largeetal.(2001)
Weak
MediumK
2 km
dacite
LowK
151560– QuartzͲadulariaveininfill
AMIRAP1060– March2014 AMIRAP1060– March2014
FromCrawfordetal.(2007)
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 11 ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 9
2km
2km 2km
AMIRAP1060– March2014
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 15 13
ICcomparison:
Grasberg: 0.34Ͳ6.70
2km
Atlantida:0.45Ͳ1.21
Gosowong: 0.19Ͳ0.83
• Highervaluesequatetohighertemperatures 151558– KͲfeldsparinalteration
envelopearoundquartzvein
• Thesevaluesarelow comparedtoGrasberg,butsimilartoAtlantida (K2O=2.93wt%)
• TerraSpecidentifiedmainlyphengite,somemixedilliteͲmuscoviteandilliteͲphengite 151560– QuartzͲadulariaveinin
porphyriticandesite 151560– SWUVlight 151558– SWUVlight
AMIRAP1060– March2014 (enhanced)
(K2O=2.66wt%)
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 16 14
Chloritecomposition– 2250peakposition Epidoteoccurrence
2km 2km
• TerraSpecdetectedchloritein20samples
• 10LAͲICPMSmountscontainedchlorite
AMIRAP1060– March2014 AMIRAP1060– March2014
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 19 ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 17
Hematiteoccurrence Chloriteoccurrence
2km 2km
Magneticsusceptibility
Wholerock
Samplewith
magnetitevein
geochemistry
2km
HighestCu:0.2% 2km
HighestAg:16ppm
Sulfur<LOD,
Magnetitevein: hematiteandCuͲsilicate:
HighͲ Cu,S,As
porphyry? transportedoxidezone?
LowͲ Mn,Zn,(Li) Pb (ppm)
S(%)
2km
Cu(ppm) Ti(ppm)
Chrysocolla present
Chloritemineral
2km
chemistry
Zn(ppm) Mn (ppm)
Sr (ppm) Li(ppm)
Giant
only
2km
Ti/Sr Ti/Li
AMIRAP1060– March2014
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 30
Summary– chloritemineralchemistry ChloriteTi/Sr ElTenienteproximitor
• Chlorite
– Chloritegrainsaregenerallysmall,inclusionͲrichor
partiallyͲreplacedanddifficulttoanalyse,leadingto
ahighrejectionrate
– Giantsystem(ZnͲMn fertilitydiagram)
– Chloriteproximitor equation(Ti/Sr,ElTeniente)
pointstoanareaeither~2kmNEofnorthern
samples,ortoaSEareabetweenWͲEsectionandSE
samplesat~2000mbelowsurface
2km
– HighTi/Sr valueatwesternendofWͲEsection,along
withsomeoverlappingTi/Sr proximitor values
suggestsasecondarytargetinSWorNW,~1750m Distance=
belowsurface ln[Ti/470Sr]
Ͳ0.0013
ChloriteTi/Sr ElTenienteproximitor
CrossͲsection
W E
Epidotemineral
chemistry
Ͳ1750m Ͳ2000m
1km
2km
Distance=
ln[Ti/470Sr]
Ͳ0.0013
n(max) =61
n(max) =58
2km
Totalresource:Unknown
AMIRAP1060– March2014
Hostrocks– andesites,dacites,volcaniclastics
39 ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 37
2km
Sb (mean) Bi(mean)
Cu(mean) Mo(mean)
• Sparsesampledistribution
– Wedonotseeauniquesolutionwhenintegratingdifferenttechniques
• Geology
– Strongestpotassicalterationisfoundatwestern(deepest)endofWͲEsection
– QuartzͲadulariaveininsampleatwesternendofWͲEsection:epithermal
mineralisation?
– MagnetiteveinandstrongKͲalteration:strongporphyryindicator 2km
– Hematite,sulfide,CuͲsilicateisfoundateastern(highest)endofWͲEsection
• Wholerockgeochemistry
– HighCuoccursinsamplesfromwesternandeasternendsofWͲEsection;
highestconcentration(2360ppm)isinsamplewithvisibleCuͲsilicate Sn (mean) Mn (mean)
• Mineralchemistry
– Chloriteandepidotemineralchemistryindicatethatthisdistrictislikelyto
hostagiantporphyryCuͲModeposit atasizesimilartoQuebrada Blanca
– Indicatorelementsinbothepidoteandchloritesuggesttargetareasatdepth
atboththewesternandeasternendsofthesectionline
– Vectoringtoolsareheavilybiasedbysampledistribution;inͲfillsampling
wouldberequiredtobetterconstrainconclusions
Conclusions
• Sampledistributionmakesitdifficulttolocatetargetslessthan~2kminsize; Summary– epidotemineralchemistry
resultswillmostlikelybeapplicabletoagiantͲscaledeposit
• Oneprimary(E)andonesecondary(W)targetareaidentified,bothlyingatup
to2kmbeneathsurface • Epidote
Primarytargetarea
IC;Chl 2250;Sulfides;CuͲsilicate;WR:Cu;
Epi:vein,As,Sb,Pb,Mn,V,Cu,Bi,Zr,Mg; – Giantsystem
Chl:Cu,Ti,Mn,Ti/Sr
– Traceelementconcentrationsonfertilitydiagrams
comparefavourablywithQuebrada Blanca,aswell
asothergiantAndeanporphyryCuͲModeposits
– Proximalindicators:highestCuvaluesinsamplesat
centreandSEofdistrict;highestSn valuesin
samplesatcentreofdistrict
– Distalindicators:highAs,Pb,Sbconcentrationsare
moreevenlydistributed
Secondarytargetarea
Potassicalt.;Mag vein;Adulariavein; • Morethanonedepositcentre?
HighK;IC;Mag Sus.;WR:S,As,(Li);
Epi:As,Pb,Sb,Bi,Sn;Chl:Ti/Sr 2km • Overlappingalterationhalos?
AMIRAP1060– March2014
ConfidentialtoP1060sponsorsuntilDecember2015 54