Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jurnal Internasional
Jurnal Internasional
Jurnal Internasional
Wrather, A., Shannon, G., Balardin, R., Carregal, L., Escobar, R., Gupta, G. K., Ma, Z.,
Morel, W., Ploper, D., and Tenuta, A. 2010. Effect of diseases on soybean yield in the top
eight producing countries in 2006. Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2010-
0125-01-RS.
Abstract
The objective of this project was to compile estimates of yield loss in soybean
[Glycine max (L.) Merr] to diseases in the top eight soybean-producing countries
in 2006. The purpose was to provide information needed by local and world
agencies to allocate funds for research and to help scientists focus and coordinate
research efforts. Methods used by plant pathologists to estimate yield loss to
diseases in these countries included systematic field surveys, cultivar trials,
diagnostic clinic records, personal observations, and questionnaires sent to crop
consultants and extension staff. The 2006 harvest of soybeans in the top eight
soybean-producing countries was reduced an estimated 59.9 million metric tonnes
(t) by diseases according to results of the current study. Soybean rust, caused by
Phakopsora pachyrhizi, reduced yield in all these countries except Canada in 2006,
and the total was more than any other. Next in decreasing order of total yield loss
were soybean cyst nematode, brown spot, seedling diseases, anthracnose, and
charcoal rot.
Introduction
The total soybean production for the world during 2006 was 220.4 million t
(5). The top eight soybean-producing countries were the U.S. (83.4 million t),
Brazil (57.0 million t), Argentina (40.5 million t), China (16.4 million t), India
(7.0 million t), Paraguay (3.6 million t), Canada (3.16 million t), and Bolivia (2.0
million t). These countries produced about 97% of the world supply for 2006.
High yields are critical to soybean producer profit margins, even during
periods when soybean prices are high. Unfortunately, yields in major soybean
producing countries have been suppressed by diseases in the past (6), and
income derived from this crop has been less than optimal. This financial loss is
important to rural economies and to economies of allied industries.
Research must focus on management of diseases that cause extensive losses,
especially when funds are limited. The objective of this project was to compile
estimates of soybean yield losses to diseases in the top eight soybean-producing
countries for the 2006 harvested crop. The goal was to show the extent of yield
loss to help local and world agencies allocate funds for research and to help
scientists focus and coordinate research efforts.
Brown spot 1176.5 Tr 340.0 0.8 2186.3 19.6 0.1 536.6 4,259.9
Charcoal rot 905.0 500.0 360.0 1.6 0 39.2 1.6 697.6 2,505.0
Pod and stem blight 181.0 0 0 11.4 95.1 19.6 0.1 208.3 515.5
Powdery mildew 0 Tr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Purple seed stain & 1086.0 Tr 720.0 0.3 0 19.6 0.7 85.2 1,911.8
Cercospora leaf blight
Rhizoctonia aerial blight 0 0 300.0 0 1188.2 39.2 0 12.5 1,539.9
Root-knot and other 22.6 Tr 260.0 7.1 2186.3 0 0.4 215.5 2,691.9
nematodesx
Soybean rust 45.3 2000.0 4720.0 0 6368.9 78.4 1.9 24.5 13,239.0
Total 59,936.5
w
Tr = trace.
x
Other nematodes were lance, lesion and reniform in Brazil; primarily lesion as well as lance, sting, and
stubby root in Canada; and lance, lesion, reniform, sting and stubby root in the United States.
y
Virus diseases were soybean mosaic, alfalfa mosaic, peanut mottle, tobacco streak, cucumber mosaic
and bean common mosaic in Argentina; cucumber mosaic in Bolivia; mungbean yellow mosaic,
soybean mosaic and peanut bud necrosis in India; and soybean mosaic, bean pod mottle, tobacco
ringspot and peanut mottle in the United States.
z
Other diseases were target spot in Argentina and Bolivia, Rhizoctonia root rot in Canada, grey spot in
China, and Myrothecium leaf spot and target spot in India.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station,
the United States Soybean Farmer Checkoff through the United Soybean Board
and the Ontario Soybean Growers. The authors thank Joyce Elrod for her efforts
in this project and thank God for guidance.
Literature Cited
1. Hartman, G. L., Sinclair, J. B., and Rupe, J. C., eds. 1999. Compendium of Soybean
Diseases, 4th Edn. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
2. Koenning, S. R. 2007. Southern United States soybean disease loss estimates for
2006. P. So. Soybean Dis. Workers 34:1-6.
3. Ploper, L. D. 2004. Economic importance of and control strategies for the major
soybean diseases in Argentina. Pages 606-614 in: P. VII World Soybean Res.
Conf., IV Intl. Soybean Processing and Utilization Conf., III Congresso Brasileiro
de Soja. F. Moscardi. et al., eds. Embrapa Soja. Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.
4. Sikora, E. J., Delaney, D. P., Delaney, M. A., Lawrence, K. S., and Pegues, M. 2009.
Evaluation of sequential fungicide spray programs for control of soybean rust.
Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2009-0402-01-RS.
5. USDA. 2006. World agriculture production: Crop production tables. Online.
Production, Supply and Distribution. USDA-Foreign Agricultural Service,
Washington, DC.
6. Wrather, J. A., Anderson, T.R., Arsyad, D.M., Tan, Y., Ploper, L.D., Porta-Puglia, A.,
Ram, H.H., and Yorinori, J.T. 2001. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10
soybean producing countries in 1998. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 23:115-121.
7. Wrather, J.A., and Koenning, S.R. 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean
yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. J. Nematol. 38:173-180.
8. Wrather, J. A., and Koenning, S. R. 2009. Effects of diseases on soybean yields in
the United States 1996 to 2007. Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-
2009-0401-01-RS.
9. Wrather, J. A., Koenning, S. R., and Anderson, T. R. 2003. Effect of diseases on
soybean yields in the United States and Ontario (1999-2002). Online. Plant
Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2003-0325-01-RV.
10. Wrather, J.A., Stienstra, W.C., and Koenning, S.R. 2001. Soybean disease loss
estimates for the United States from 1996 to 1998. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 23:122-
131.