The document discusses 10 factors for the success or failure of peacekeeping missions. For factor 1 on consent and sincerity, it summarizes that the Arusha Agreement in Rwanda did not have the consent of Hutu extremists and did not sufficiently protect human rights. For factor 2 on impartiality, it notes UNAMIR stood by as 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu were killed. For factor 3 on outside cooperation, it again states UNAMIR watched the killings. In short, the document analyzes factors in the Rwandan peacekeeping mission and finds several factors like consent, impartiality and cooperation contributed to its failure.
The document discusses 10 factors for the success or failure of peacekeeping missions. For factor 1 on consent and sincerity, it summarizes that the Arusha Agreement in Rwanda did not have the consent of Hutu extremists and did not sufficiently protect human rights. For factor 2 on impartiality, it notes UNAMIR stood by as 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu were killed. For factor 3 on outside cooperation, it again states UNAMIR watched the killings. In short, the document analyzes factors in the Rwandan peacekeeping mission and finds several factors like consent, impartiality and cooperation contributed to its failure.
The document discusses 10 factors for the success or failure of peacekeeping missions. For factor 1 on consent and sincerity, it summarizes that the Arusha Agreement in Rwanda did not have the consent of Hutu extremists and did not sufficiently protect human rights. For factor 2 on impartiality, it notes UNAMIR stood by as 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu were killed. For factor 3 on outside cooperation, it again states UNAMIR watched the killings. In short, the document analyzes factors in the Rwandan peacekeeping mission and finds several factors like consent, impartiality and cooperation contributed to its failure.
1 Consent and Sincerity In the case of Rwanda the implementation of the Arusha Agreement was not in the interest of the Hutu extremists. Among other reasons, to defend these positions the Hutus extremist subsequently started the genocide in which they killed the Tutsi and moderate Hutus for their social position and jobs. The agreement did not provide sufficient details to human rights for all tribes concern. Hence, the concern and sincerity for all parties were not clearly indicated and enforced. 2 Impartiality and the non- UNAMIR did not use force use of force where they stood by and watched from the sideline when about 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were slaughtered. 3 Co-Operation from UNAMIR and the rest of the Important Outside Actors international community stood by and watched from the sideline when about 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were slaughtered. 4 Sense of Security of the UNAMIR was unable to Parties provide a sense of security as the warring parties rearmed knowing that UNAMIR would not have the option to act. 5 Clear, Approriate and This understanding didn't Achievable Mandate furnish the Assembled Countries with a job on numerous fundamental issues that made the contention start, for example, human rights and elections including the genocide. 6 Timely Deployment and UNAMIR was deployed at the Right Time relatively rapidly, as a result a number of deadlines were not reached and doubt between the parties became even stronger. 7 Competent Leadership Secretary-General Booh Booh and Personnel, and Clear failed to meet the required for Command Structures the parties involved. Secretary- General Booh Booh leadership was not respected and not taken serious by the parties. 8 Sufficiently Long The UNAMIR take three Duration years to complete the mission. This is because there were many issue and conflict happen between them. The UN action to extend their mission is a right to achieve a goal. 9 Internal and External Co- - - Ordination 10 Ownership - -