Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

1
www.northeasterncollege.edu.ph
Santiago City, Philippines
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter embodies the generated data in response to the problems
passed for investigation.
Table 2
Respondents as to Age
Particulars f %
20-30 years old 11 27.50
31-40 years old 19 47.50
41-50 years old 8 20.00
51 years old and above 2 5.00
Total 40 100.00
Table 3
Respondents as to Gender
Particulars f %
Male 14 35.00
Female 26 65.00
Total 40 100.00
2
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Table 4
Respondents as to Civil Status
Particulars f %
Single 16 40.00
Married 23 57.50
Widowed 1 2.50
Total 40 100.00
Table 5
Respondents as to Highest Educational Attainment
Particulars f %
Bachelor’s Degree 32 80.00
MAEd Graduate 6 15.00
With MAEd Units 1 2.50
EdD/PhD 1 2.50
Total 40 100.00
3
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Table 6
Respondents as to Present Position
Particulars f %
Teacher 1 14 35.00
Teacher 2 2 5.00
Teacher 3 20 50.00
Master Teacher 1 4 10.00
Total 40 100.00
Table 7
Respondents as to Latest Performance Rating
Particulars f %
Outstanding 19 47.50
Very Satisfactory 21 52.50
Satisfactory 0 0
Total 40 100.00
4
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Table 8
Respondents as to Length of Teaching Experience
Particulars f %
1 – 10 years 31 77.50
11 – 20 years 9 22.50
Total 40 100.00
Table 9
Respondents as to Level of In-Service Training Attended
Particulars f
National 1
Regional 2
Division 32
District 40
School 40
Frequency of Mention
Table 10
Extent of Realization of the Objectives of Using Technology in Araling
Panlipunan Instruction
Particulars W.M. Q.D. Rank

5
GRADUATE SCHOOL
1. Learning to work collaboratively 4.88 FR 1
2. Presenting information to an audience 4.83 FR 2
3. Learning to work independently 4.75 FR 3
4. Analyzing information 4.73 FR 4.5
5. Improving computer skills 4.73 FR 4.5
6. Expressing students’ ideas in writing 4.43 FR 6
7. Mastering skills just taught 4.25 FR 7
8. Remediation of skills not learned 4.20 R 8
9. Finding out about ideas and 3.80 R 9

information
10. Communicating electronically with 3.03 MR 10

other people
Average Weighted Mean 4.36 Fully Realized
It can be gleaned from the table that teacher-respondents that the following
methods are “very often” used in English 1 instruction: “Phonics Method” with the
highest weighted mean of 4.87, followed by “The Language Experience Method”
with a weighted mean of 4.53, as well as “The Look and Say Method” and “The
Contextual Support Method” with weighted means of 4.50 and 4.33, respectively.
The average weighted mean of 4.56 implies that the different methods are “very
often” utilized by Grade 1 teachers in English instruction.

6
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Table 11
Extent of Adherence to the Guidelines in the Effective Use of Technology in
Araling Panlipunan Instruction
1. Create a true learning environment 4.95 FA 1
2. Contribute to the research and 4.88 FA 2

evaluation of social studies and
technology
3. Foster the development of the skills, 4.80 FA 3

knowledge, and participation as good
citizens in a democratic society
4. Introduce technology in context 4.73 FA 4
5. Use technology to improve student 4.70 FA 5.5

learning, not just to use it
6. Include opportunities for students to 4.70 FA 5.5

study relationships among science,
technology, and society
7. Be willing to learn about different 4.68 FA 7

technologies from your students and
they will be more open to learning
from you
8. Foster the development of the skills, 4.58 FA 8

knowledge, and participation as good
citizens in a democratic society
7
GRADUATE SCHOOL
9. Extend learning beyond what could be 4.03 A 9

done without technology
10. Be willing to make mistakes 3.93 A 20
11. Research or test different tools in a 3.83 A 11

category before committing to one
Average Weighted Mean 4.53 Very Often
In terms of use of the different strategies in English 1 instruction, teacher-
respondents claimed that the following strategies are “very often” utilized: “Write to
Read” with a weighted mean of 4.80, “Word Walls” with a weighted mean of 4.73,
“Make It Personal” and “Integrate Technology” sharing a weighted mean of 4.67,
“Make It A Game” at 4.60, “Focus on Fluency and Phonics Simultaneously” at
4.53, “Graphic Organizers” at 4.50, “Use Metacognition”, “More Than Just Books”,
and “Voice and Choice” sharing a weighted mean of 4.40, “Employ the 3-2-1
Strategy” at 4.37, as well as “Explicitly Teach and Display Strategies” and “Offer
Proper Praise” with a common weighted mean of 4.33; while “Decoding: Focus on
Problem Sounds” and “Avoid Over-Correcting” are “often” used with weighted
means of 4.13 and 4.07, respectively. The average weighted mean of 4.56 implies
that the different strategies are “very often” utilized by teachers in English 1
instruction.
8
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Table 12
Extent of Availability of Technology Resources in Araling Panlipunan 10
Instruction
1. Slides/slide shows 4.98 HA 1
2. PowerPoint presentations 4.88 HA 2
3. Transparencies 4.70 HA 3
4. Television 4.60 HA 4
5. Overhead projector 4.30 HA 5
6. Spreadsheets 4.15 A 6
7. Internet access 4.00 A 7
8. Different computer software 3.68 A 8
9. Computer laboratory 3.35 MA 9
10. Printer and scanner 3.20 MA 10
11. Computer 3.15 MA 11

9
GRADUATE SCHOOL
12. Video 2.98 MA 12
13. Computer operation manual 2.80 MA 13.5
14. Distance learning equipment and 2.80 MA 13.5

infrastructure
15. Computer-generated exercises, drills, 2.18 SA 15

and activities
16. Electronic mail 1.25 LA 16
Average Weighted Mean 3.35 Moderately

Available
It is apparent from the table that the following approaches are “very often”
utilized in English 1 instruction as claimed by the respondents: “Phonics or Bottom
up Approach” with the highest mean of 4.43, “Whole Word or Top Down
Approach” with a weighted mean of4.40, “Interactive Model” at 4.37, “Basal
Reader Approach or Whole Language Approach” at 4.33, as well as “Literature-
Based Approach” and “Language Experience Approach” with a common weighted
mean of 4.27; while “Balanced Approach” is “often” employed with a weighted
mean of 4.20. The average weighted mean of 4.32 indicates that in general, the
different approaches are “very often” used in English 1 instruction.
Table 13
Extent of Use of Technology Resources in Araling Panlipunan 10 Instruction

10
GRADUATE SCHOOL
1. PowerPoint presentations 4.48 VO 1
2. Slides/slide shows 4.30 VO 2
3. Television 3.80 O 3
4. Video 3.78 O 4
5. Internet access 2.75 So 5.5
6. Printer and scanner 2.75 So 5.5
7. Overhead projector. 2.50 Se 7.5
8. Computer operation manual 2.50 Se 7.5
9. Spreadsheets 2.08 Se 9
10. Computer 2.35 Se 10
11. Transparencies 2.03 Se 11
12. Distance learning equipment and 1.98 Se 12

infrastructure
13. Electronic mail 1.83 Se 13
14. Computer laboratory 1.70 NA 14
15. Computer-generated exercises, drills, 1.28 NA 15

and activities
16. Different computer software 1.10 NA 16
Average Weighted Mean 2.57 Sometimes
The table transpires that the following methods are “very effective” in
English 1 instruction: “Phonics Method” with a weighted mean of 4.80, as well as
“The Look and Say Method”, “The Language Experience Method”, and “The
Contextual Support Method” with weighted means of 4.57, 4.50, and 4.43,
11
GRADUATE SCHOOL
respectively. The average weighted mean of 4.58 is an indication that the different
methods used in English 1 instruction are “very effective” as claimed by teacher-
respondents.
Table 14
Extent of Effect of Technology Resources in Araling Panlipunan 10
Instruction
1. Video 4.70 VE 1
2. Computer 4.13 VE 2
3. Internet access 4.00 VE 3
4. Overhead projector 3.98 VE 4.5
5. PowerPoint presentations 3.98 VE 4.5
6. Slides/slide shows 3.90 VE 6
7. Transparencies 3.80 VE 8.5
8. Television 3.53 VE 8.5
9. Computer laboratory 3.43 VE 8.5

12
GRADUATE SCHOOL
10. Different computer software 3.33 VE 8.5
11. Spreadsheets 2.88 VE 11.5
12. Electronic mail 2.80 VE 11.5
13. Distance learning equipment and 2.78 VE 13

infrastructure
14. Printer and scanner 2.48 E 14
15. Computer operation manual 2.43
16. Computer-generated exercises, drills, 2.38 E 15

and activities
Average Weighted Mean 3.42 Effective
It can be deduced from the table that the following strategies are “very
effective” in English 1 instruction: “Graphic Organizers” with the highest weighted
mean of 4.63, “Word Walls” with a weighted mean of 4.60, “Integrate Technology”
at 4.57, “Make It Personal” and “Write to Read” sharing a mean of 4.53, “Make It A
Game” at 4.47, “Focus on Fluency and Phonics Simultaneously”, “Use
Metacognition”, “More Than Just Books”, and “Voice and Choice” with a common
mean of 4.43, “Employ the 3-2-1 Strategy” and “Offer Proper Praise” sharing a
mean of 4.30, as well as “Explicitly Teach and Display Strategies” with a weighted
mean of 4.27; while “Avoid Over-Correcting” and “Decoding: Focus on Problem
Sounds” are “effective” with weighted means of 4.20 and 4.07, respectively. The
13
GRADUATE SCHOOL
average weighted mean of 4.41 implies that the different strategies are "very
effective” in English 1 instruction as claimed by teacher-respondents.
Table 15
Extent of Effect Technology Integration on the Academic Performance of
Students in Araling Panlipunan 10 Instruction
1. Higher grade 4.70 VE 1
2. Better performance during classroom 4.23 VE 2

activities, e.g. experiments, group
activities, etc.
14
GRADUATE SCHOOL
3. Increased classroom 4.10 E 3

participation/recitation
4. Higher scores in quizzes and 3.83 E 4

summative test
5. Increased interest in studies 3.78 E 5
6. Improved critical thinking skills 3.45 E 6
7. Personal learning responsibility 2.88 ME 7
8. Independence in learning 2.85 ME 8
9. Enhanced problem solving ability 1.90 SE 9
With regards to the extent of effect of the different approaches used in
teaching English, respondents claimed that the following approaches are “very
effective”: “Phonics or Bottom up Approach” with the highest weighted mean of
4.67, “Whole Word or Top Down Approach” with a weighted mean of 4.57, “Basal
Reader Approach or Whole Language Approach” at 4.53, “Interactive Model”,
“Literature-Based Approach”, and “Language Experience Approach” sharing a
weighted mean of 4.50, as well as “Balanced Approach” having the lowest mean
of 4.33. The average weighted mean of 4.51 signifies that teacher-respondents
highly acknowledge the effectiveness of the different approaches in English 1
instruction.
Table 16
15
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Extent of the Challenges Encountered in the Integration of Technology in

Araling Panlipunan 10 Instruction
1. Negative attitude the use of 3.52 S 1

Information and Communication
Technology
2. Lack of knowledge and experience on 3.28 MS 2

ICT instruction
3. Malfunctioning equipment which result 3.25 MS 3.5

in lost time
4. Learners may lost time in navigation 3.25 MS 3.5
5. Lack or absence of on and off shelf 3.18 MS 5

soft wares
6. Absence or poor internet connection 2.90 MS 6
7. Lack of support from the school 2.78 MS 7

administration
8. Absence of computer and other 2.70 MS 8

resources in the classroom
9. Lack of knowledge and experience of 2.65 MS 9

teacher in technology use.
10. Overwhelming multimedia “gimmicks” 2.52 SS 10
11. Learners when left on their own too 2.10 SS 11

much and may feel overwhelmed by
the information and resources
available
Average Weighted Mean 2.92 Moderately

Serious
16
GRADUATE SCHOOL
As reflected on the table, pupils “very often” manifest difficulties in “Study
Strategies” and “Grammar Awareness and Structure” with means of 4.33 and
4.23, respectively; while they “often” exhibit difficulties on the following: “Book and
Print Knowledge” and “Reading Comprehension” with a common weighted mean
of 4.20, “Alphabet Knowledge” with a weighted mean of 4.17, “Oral Language”,
“Phonological Awareness”, “Spelling”, “Writing and Composition”, “Listening
Comprehension”, and “Attitudes towards language, literacy, and literature”
sharing a weighted mean of 4.10, as well as “Phonics and Word Recognition”,
“Fluency”, and “Vocabulary Development” with a common weighted mean of 4.07.
The average weighted mean of 4.14 suggests that pupils “often” manifest
difficulties in English as perceived by teacher-respondents.
Table 17
Extent of Effect of the Interventions for Successful Technology Integration
in Araling Panlipunan 10 Instruction
1. Game-Based Learning and 4.13 E 1

Assessment
2. Using Social Media to Engage 3.98 E 2

Students
3. Project-Based Activities Incorporating 3.80 E 3

17
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Technology
4. Instructional Tools like Interactive 3.78 E 4.5

Whiteboards and Student Response
Systems
5. Web-Based Projects, Explorations, 3.78 E 4.5

and Research
6. Student-Created Media like Podcasts, 3.75 E 6

Videos, or Slideshows
7. Online Learning and Blended 3.70 E 7

Classrooms
8. Learning with Mobile and Handheld 3.60 E 8

Devices
9. Collaborative Online Tools like Wikis 2.60 SE 9

or Google Docs
Assessment of the extent of seriousness of the difficulties encountered by
teachers in English 1 instruction reveals that the following difficulties are” serious”:
“Child cannot communicate in English” with the highest weighted mean of 4.17, as
well as “Lack of motivation” and “Mother tongue interference” with weighted
means of 3.77 and 3.57, respectively. On the other hand, the following difficulties
are “moderately serious”: “Laziness” and “Lack of support by parents” with a
common weighted mean of 3.30, “Effects of poverty” at 3.27, “Past continuous
failure in school” and “Overloading of curriculum” sharing a weighted mean of
3.03, as well as “Lack of textbooks and reading materials” and “Parents’ illiteracy
18
GRADUATE SCHOOL
level” with weighted means of 2.90 and 2.77, respectively; while the following are
“slightly serious”; “Poor learning environment” with a weighted mean of 2.20, as
well as “Chronic disease”, “Genetic problems”, and “Poor teaching” sharing the
lowest weighted mean of 2.17. The average weighted mean of 2.99 implies that
there is moderate seriousness of the difficulties encountered by teachers in
English 1 instruction.

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter embodies the generated data in response to the problems

passed for investigation.

20-30 years old 11 27.50

31-40 years old 19 47.50

41-50 years old 8 20.00

51 years old and above 2 5.00

Bachelor’s Degree 32 80.00

MAEd Graduate 6 15.00

With MAEd Units 1 2.50

Master Teacher 1 4 10.00

Very Satisfactory 21 52.50

Particulars W.M. Q.D. Rank

1. Learning to work collaboratively 4.88 FR 1

2. Presenting information to an audience 4.83 FR 2

3. Learning to work independently 4.75 FR 3

4. Analyzing information 4.73 FR 4.5

5. Improving computer skills 4.73 FR 4.5

6. Expressing students’ ideas in writing 4.43 FR 6

7. Mastering skills just taught 4.25 FR 7

8. Remediation of skills not learned 4.20 R 8

9. Finding out about ideas and 3.80 R 9

10. Communicating electronically with 3.03 MR 10

Average Weighted Mean 4.36 Fully Realized

highest weighted mean of 4.87, followed by “The Language Experience Method”

often” utilized by Grade 1 teachers in English instruction.

Particulars W.M. Q.D. Rank

1. Create a true learning environment 4.95 FA 1

2. Contribute to the research and 4.88 FA 2

3. Foster the development of the skills, 4.80 FA 3

4. Introduce technology in context 4.73 FA 4

5. Use technology to improve student 4.70 FA 5.5

6. Include opportunities for students to 4.70 FA 5.5

7. Be willing to learn about different 4.68 FA 7

8. Foster the development of the skills, 4.58 FA 8

9. Extend learning beyond what could be 4.03 A 9

10. Be willing to make mistakes 3.93 A 20

11. Research or test different tools in a 3.83 A 11

Average Weighted Mean 4.53 Very Often

In terms of use of the different strategies in English 1 instruction, teacher-

“Make It Personal” and “Integrate Technology” sharing a weighted mean of 4.67,

“Make It A Game” at 4.60, “Focus on Fluency and Phonics Simultaneously” at

Particulars W.M. Q.D. Rank

1. Slides/slide shows 4.98 HA 1

2. PowerPoint presentations 4.88 HA 2

5. Overhead projector 4.30 HA 5

7. Internet access 4.00 A 7

8. Different computer software 3.68 A 8

9. Computer laboratory 3.35 MA 9

10. Printer and scanner 3.20 MA 10

11. Computer 3.15 MA 11

12. Video 2.98 MA 12

13. Computer operation manual 2.80 MA 13.5

14. Distance learning equipment and 2.80 MA 13.5

15. Computer-generated exercises, drills, 2.18 SA 15

16. Electronic mail 1.25 LA 16

Average Weighted Mean 3.35 Moderately

utilized in English 1 instruction as claimed by the respondents: “Phonics or Bottom

Approach” with a weighted mean of4.40, “Interactive Model” at 4.37, “Basal

Reader Approach or Whole Language Approach” at 4.33, as well as “Literature-

Based Approach” and “Language Experience Approach” with a common weighted