Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Westerosi Women: Feminist Narrative in George R.R. Martin's "A Game of Thrones"
Westerosi Women: Feminist Narrative in George R.R. Martin's "A Game of Thrones"
the hit fantasy series as “only tits and dragons” (qtd. in Majka). This sentiment – that Game of
Thrones is nothing but a sexist, superficial assault on our culture – is one shared by many.
Notably, however, the most vocal proponents of this belief often have very little experience with
the cultural phenomenon themselves. And, perhaps even more tellingly, those who do are almost
guaranteed to have watched the television series rather than have read the novels. Because of the
many character and plot differences between the show and the books, this distinction is
The purpose of this analysis is to examine how author George R.R. Martin creates his
own version of feminism in the Game of Thrones book series through construction of female
characters and a writing style which disrupts the traditional masculine narrative. Since Game of
Thrones covers easily over 5,000 pages, I will focus on one specific family and its female
members – the Stark women – in an effort to provide a more comprehensive analysis. While the
series does contain noticeable elements of the male gaze, Martin’s unique development of a set
of female characters breaks ground for a new era of feminist storytelling through construction of
The rationales for this study are threefold. First, there is a distinct lack of scholarly
research into this subject. Game of Thrones is a recent phenomenon, and as such, it has not yet
received the same degree of attention as some of its fictional counterparts. Indeed, the few
existing in-depth analyses of Game of Thrones occur within popular, rather than scholarly,
outlets and focus almost exclusively on dialogue and scenes unique to the television series (e.g.,
Garber 3). Making this distinction between the books and the television series is vital to
recognizing differences between media, as well as fully understanding Martin’s original work.
More extensive analysis of the series, and specifically its feminist implications, will contribute
Moreover, this analysis has the potential to give us insight into how Game of Thrones
encourages audiences to behave. In his article “Literature as Equipment for Living,” scholar
Kenneth Burke argues that we use rhetoric to guide our daily lives. While he begins by
demonstrating this concept through examples of proverbs, Burke extends his application to other
literature as well, arguing that even “the most complex and sophisticated works of art [can]
legitimately be considered somewhat as ‘proverbs writ large’” (Burke 296). While applying this
theory to fantasy novels may initially appear ill-conceived given that we are not troubled by
monsters, evil wizards, or other explicit issues in these books, the relevance of his argument
exists at a formal level. Essentially, even rhetoric dealing with fictional problems contains
themes and messages directly applicable to reality – for example, themes of cyclicity or death
(Brummett 110). Despite the books’ obvious fantasy vehicle, Game of Thrones has practical
applications of this nature. Martin is “arguing for the real-world relevance of a series whose plots
revolve around ice-zombies and dragons. And…creating a series that exists not just for
entertainment value, but also to be discussed, and slogan-ed, and memed” (Garber). A deeper
understanding of how the Game of Thrones book series constructs and portrays its female
characters allows us to make connections to our own world and to assess how the series might
Finally, this study counteracts the all-too popular belief that Game of Thrones is nothing
but incest pornography. The issue of female representation in the series has become increasingly
controversial; Game of Thrones “seems to invoke particularly polarized claims that it either is a
feminist text, or that it is extremely antifeminist and oppressive to women” (Ferreday 4). The
majority of responses on this subject fall in the latter camp (Ferreday; Garber; Zimmerman). This
study will hopefully provide enough of a comprehensive analysis to demonstrate that this issue is
I will begin this analysis by providing some cultural context for Game of Thrones itself,
discussing both the reception of the series and a brief outline of the story’s content. I will then
discuss feminist ideological criticism before moving to an extensive analysis of the Stark women
Everyone has their own understanding of what feminism is. For this study, it is defined
simply as the effort to change existing power relations between men and women (Foss 142).
Because feminism deals with a hegemonic or ubiquitous ideology, feminist criticism is a form of
ideological criticism. Feminist critique challenges the ways in which the “status quo of unequal
(Hart and Daughton 284). In other words, it assumes that traditional acts, literature, and criticism
masculinity. For example, the 2010 film Black Swan “romanticizes the patriarchal construction
her passivity and deference to male authority (Fisher and Jacobs 3). The protagonist, Nina, is
entirely at the whim of her ballet director until the end of the film – at which point, she is driven
to stab herself in the stomach. Furthermore, she is constantly criticized for being too prudish,
innocent, and frigid (Fisher and Jacobs 4). Feminist narratives, meanwhile, disrupt this
traditionally androcentric rhetoric. In these stories, we often see strong female characters who do
not fulfill female gender stereotypes and thus overthrow conventional femininity. In best-selling
Indian author Nayantara Sahgal’s novel The Day in Shadow, for instance, she creates a
principled female protagonist fighting to escape an abusive marriage in a patriarchal society. The
character, Simrit, wants to land on her own feet, and her longing for freedom and individuality
drives the storyline (Selvi 170). How female characters are developed, and the roles they are
given within a story, are enormous indicators of a message’s ability to perpetuate or disrupt
conventional androcentricity.
undermined through writing style and novel structure itself. The concept of the ‘male gaze,’
outlined neatly by Sonja and Karen Foss in their treatment of Garrison Keillor’s radio
monologues, essentially proposes that the construction of a male protagonist plays to a masculine
spectator who identifies with them (2). This indicates an implied androcentricity, or defaulted
masculine perspective, which often goes unaddressed. In contrast to their male counterparts,
female characters are usually positioned as the object of the gaze, displayed for the enjoyment of
men. This forces female audiences either to position themselves as a “passive recipient of male
desire or as a viewer of another woman who is a passive recipient of male desire” (Foss and Foss
410). The rotating, third-person writing style that George R.R. Martin uses in Game of Thrones
George R.R. Martin published A Game of Thrones on August 1, 1996. Although Martin
intended the book to be the first of a trilogy, he had no idea the kind of commotion A Song of Ice
and Fire would receive. A Game of Thrones—or Game of Thrones—received little to no public
attention prior to its release, despite Martin’s frequent trips to publicize it at bookstores and
libraries across the country. Now, he has sold over 70 million copies of the series worldwide
(Flood). Not only is a hit HBO show based on his work, but it has become so popular that said
show is advancing through the plot faster than his actual books (Garber). Martin is now fighting
against his own hype, desperately trying to keep up with expectations – and he is performing
spectacularly.
Game of Thrones is set in a fictional medieval land called Westeros. Surrounded by the
arctic, sea, and neighboring lands, the kingdom is fractured, divided by power struggles among
noble families. While an incredible number of bloodlines populate Westeros, the family that this
study focuses on – the Starks – is of particular importance. The Starks are a Northern family;
they are the heroes, fighting not only to defend their family and land, but for honor as well
While Martin wrote his novels in third person, each chapter takes the point of view of a
different character through third person. Several characters recur throughout the novel as well,
including Arya, Catelyn, and Sansa Stark. Martin’s rotating perspectives provide unique insight
into the complexities of each character and thereby allow for exponentially expanded character
development.
The classic criticism of Game of Thrones television show is that it sexualizes and
objectifies women, with some even claiming that the program glorifies sexual violence. Amy
Zimmerman, entertainment correspondent for The Daily Beast, writes, “It does seem that the
show's women are more oppressed, weak, and petty than their male counterparts - nor does it
escape critics' notice that the strongest females on the show appear to be those who have
suppressed their femininity and gender identities altogether” (1). And such elements do
undeniably exist, not only in HBO’s series but in Martin’s novel, as well. In both venues,
Daenerys Targaryen’s brother sells her gets literally sold to a tribal leader, nameless and
countless women are raped, and prostitution and brothels permeate the scene. Such criticism,
however, neglects the complexities afforded to the majority of Game of Thrones’ female
characters, particularly in the books. Additionally, the suppression of femininity that critics like
Zimmerman reference is based on an established expectation of what femininity should look like
– when in actuality, the fantasy series’ representations of women work to overthrow that
hegemony.
While acts of sexual violence toward women do occur throughout the book series, an
equal number of acts of empowerment also occur. Late in the series, the northern families
appoint bastard son of Ned Stark and unofficial member of the Stark family, Jon Snow, as King
of the North. In what is essentially a medieval press conference, Snow shares his strategy to fight
wars on multiple fronts. “Everyone age 10 to 16 will drill daily with spears, pikes, bow, and
arrow,” he tells his assembled fighters, to which one of his generals – Lord Glover – replies that
it is about time they teach their boys to fight. The reason this exchange matters is because while
it sounds like stereotypical dialogue, in this case, it becomes more. “Not just the boys,” Snow
replies. “We can’t defend the North if only half the population is fighting” (Martin, A Dance
572). How the heroic? male characters of Game of Thrones treat their female counterparts is a
large part of what makes the series’ feminist spin so compelling, and is an element often
Women are not spared from backstabbing or conflict, and this is in itself an embrace of feminist
philosophy. George R.R. Martin himself is fully aware of this aspect of his story, telling his
audience that to him, “Being a feminist is about treating men and women the same. I regard men
and women as all human – yes, there are differences, but many of those differences are created
by the culture that we live in” (qtd. in Majka). Martin chooses to include elements of traditional
underscore the differences and complexities in his female characters. This humanizes them in a
Few literary works have as many influential female characters as Game of Thrones.
Women’s roles in fantasy novels are traditionally limited to a few, vaguely defined characters; in
Game of Thrones, on the other hand, females dominate the plot. Starks aside, there are at least
three major female characters worth noting: evil queen Cersei Lannister; freedom fighter and
heir to the throne, Daenerys Targaryen; and cunningly manipulative matriarch, Olenna Tyrell.
This sheer proliferation of feminine personas in Game of Thrones suggests a predisposition for a
in the series.
The Stark women are perhaps the best set of female characters to analyze simply because
of the sharp contrasts in their personalities and appearances. The youngest daughter, Arya, is a
strong-willed and tomboyish figure who defiantly bucks all traditional notions of femininity.
Catelyn Stark is the matriarch of the family, a strong and competent force to be reckoned with
despite her conformity to traditional gender traits. Sansa, the eldest daughter, is essentially a
living embodiment of feminine stereotypes and expectations such as domesticity and passivity.
She serves as a perfect foil to her sister. Through observing these three distinct types of female
characters, we are able to gain a better understanding of the ways in which George R.R. Martin
Arya. Arya is the youngest Stark daughter. She does not get along with her sister Sansa in
the slightest, and is the butt of constant criticism by those around her for her strong resistance to
traditionally feminine expectations and tasks. This becomes evident as early as the first book in
the series, when Arya is comparing her own needlework to her sister’s. In a segment written
from Arya’s perspective, she laments, “It wasn’t fair…Sansa could sew and dance and sing. She
wrote poetry. She knew how to dress. She played the high harp and the bells” (Martin, A Game
70). Throughout these introductory chapters, Martin begins his commentary on androcentric
culture by establishing a sharp contrast between the two girls through emphasis on their distinct
Importantly, Martin does not use Arya’s lack of traditional femininity to write her
character off; instead, she discovers her own innate abilities later in the series – and they are
nothing like her sister’s, for Arya inverts gender norms. When Arya’s father catches her playing
with a short sword – gifted to her by her older brother – he chooses to encourage the behavior
rather than forbid it, setting her up with a professional swordsman for lessons. While her
instructor insists on calling her “boy,” which might be seen as reinforcing gendered occupations
and skill sets, he also compares sword fighting with dancing. “This is the bravo’s dance, the
water dance, swift and sudden,” Arya’s instructor tells her (Martin, A Game 225). This naming is
a subtle inversion of gender norms, as dancing is more commonly associated with femininity
than masculinity. Arya also calls her sword “Needle,” which is another ironic use of naming
(Martin, A Game 98). Associating an exclusively masculine object with a feminine activity again
inverts traditional gender expectations, almost equalizing the playing field by illuminating an
often overlooked androcentricity – that only men are able to carry or use weapons of war and,
Arya’s character arc is a unique one in that it is defined by her own control and decisions,
rather than the whims and actions of the men around her. Lost in the commotion caused by the
king’s death, she seeks refuge in a neighboring country. Taken in by an organization of assassins,
Arya learns how to fight, to disguise herself, and – most importantly – to kill (Martin, A Feast
722). This completes her performance of masculinity, as it gives her a position by and large
reserved for men. In this way, Martin develops her character in distinct opposition to traditional
feminine characters and upsets androcentric notions of femininity often reinforced in literature
Catelyn. Catelyn Stark is the family matriarch and a decidedly more multi-faceted
character than Arya. Her influence in the kingdom begins much later than her male counterparts,
and at the beginning of the novel she greatly conforms to the patriarchal society around her.
Catelyn’s initial involvement with the Starks began in her childhood, when she fell in love with
their eldest son. When he died, Catelyn’s father married her to the next in line – Eddard Stark –
in order to bring the two powerful families even closer together (Martin, A Game 24). Despite
this arranged marriage, however, Catelyn “had [still] come to love her husband with all her
heart” (Martin, A Game 66). Catelyn’s distinct lack of control over her fate, and her passive
dominance.
Shortly after this is revealed, however, Catelyn demonstrates quite different traits when
she kidnaps Tyrion Lannister whom she blames for crippling her son. She risks her life to travel
miles on horseback, alone, and in doing so shows an independence and confidence not normally
associated with traditionally feminine characters. Moreover, once Catelyn has Tyrion “bound
and helpless,” she takes him to her sister for judgment (Martin, A Game 360). The act of
traditional femininity. Catelyn also assumes a decidedly feminist stance in her decision to bring
Tyrion to another female character, rather than her husband; not only does Catelyn act
independently of her spouse, but also she demonstrates her belief that women can be wise
George R.R. Martin’s reputation rests on his willingness to kill off any character,
regardless of previous involvement or action. As members of the Stark family fall and disappear,
the title of “Lord” falls on Catelyn’s eldest son, Robb. Rather than rule for him, or pressure him
into certain actions, Catelyn defers to him. Recognizing that her interference would be a threat to
his perceived authority, Catelyn takes on a decidedly more advisory role (Martin, A Game 598).
While this act of capitulation plays to cultural male dominance, the motivation behind it – her
intelligent rather than merely obedient. In this way, Martin again bucks the traditional
Catelyn’s character is also unique in its sharp and sudden changes throughout the series.
When she and Robb are murdered and their entire army massacred at the now infamous Red
Wedding, everything becomes incredibly uncertain. Since there are no more sections in the rest
of the novel written from her perspective, Catelyn is understood to be dead – until, in book four,
she is reintroduced as Lady Stoneheart (Martin, A Feast 914). Mystically brought back to life,
she is seemingly devoid of compassion; her only goal is to wreak havoc and to murder anyone
and everyone involved in her family’s destruction. “She wants her son alive, or the men who
killed him dead,” Lady Stoneheart’s translator tells us (Martin, A Feast 914). This further
complicates Catelyn’s character, providing her with a depth not often afforded to females in
fantasy novels. Whereas once complicit in perpetrating toxic femininity, albeit with a few minor
saving graces, she is now causing havoc and murdering with the same ferocity as her male peers.
complicated. She performs behaviors unconventional for traditionally feminine characters, but all
in service to her sons and husband. She simultaneously breaks free from gender roles while also
Sansa. Sansa Stark is Catelyn’s eldest daughter and the character who conforms most
society’s ideal of perfect femininity. She can dance, sew, is physically attractive, and is
But more importantly, Sansa exerts absolutely no control over her fate. She is first told
she is to be married to Prince Joffrey, a prospect that initially excites her incredibly. As Martin
writes in an early chapter from Sansa’s perspective, “Sansa already looked her best…It was a
great honor to ride with the queen, and besides, Prince Joffrey might be there. Her betrothed. Just
thinking it made her feel a strange fluttering inside” (Martin, A Game 140). When Eddard Stark
dies, however, the queen deems her unfit to marry Joffrey. Instead, the throne keeps her hostage
for a time before arranging her marriage to Tyrion Lannister. While the two do, in fact, get
married, the union is short lived due to accusations of Tyrion’s involvement in Joffrey’s murder.
Sansa escapes the capital with Petyr Baelish, also known as “Littlefinger,” who convinces her to
leave with him, but she then must live another woman’s life, afraid of being discovered and
captured (Martin, A Dance 472). The most distinct feature of these proceedings is Sansa’s
passivity. Everything happens to her, nothing is ever caused by her or defined by her actions.
Sansa’s character is necessary to highlight the issues with female representation in the
fantasy genre. Despite initial pity, her deference to anyone claiming authority makes her an
almost despicable figure and provides the perfect contrast to Arya and Catelyn. Martin uses
Sansa to identify the problems with classic depictions of women, which is critical to his broader
feminist theme.1
George R.R. Martin’s intense concern for his female characters’ development is
facilitated by his writing style. Through rotating third-person character perspectives, Martin
allows his readers to grasp the inner motivations and thought processes of all his characters –
including women. Take, for example, our previous discussion of Catelyn Stark’s deference to her
son Robb. Told from the perspective of a male protagonist, this scene would epitomize the
stereotypical feminine passivity and spectatorship of which Foss and Foss warn. Instead, we
understand Catelyn’s silence as the result of her political knowledge. Martin takes care to make
this explicit, writing, “Catelyn wanted to run to him, to kiss his sweet brow…But here in front of
his lords, she dared not. He was playing a man’s part now, and she would not take that away
from him” (Martin, A Game 598). This perspective turns what would traditionally be a
reinforcement of androcentricity into a challenge to the male gaze and so allows us to appreciate
1
It is worth noting that in the television series, Sansa eventually develops into a competent and politically-ingenious figure. This
evolution, however, primarily happens long after the show diverges from the books, and so is irrelevant to my analysis.
Martin remains mindful of this element of his work throughout the series. When Sandor
Clegane essentially kidnaps Arya in the third book, she is taken to briefly live anonymously in a
rural village. While this is a loose parallel of her sister Sansa’s storyline, the difference here is
evident through Arya’s narrative. Martin writes, “Some of the women tried to put her in a dress
and make her do needlework…But she was having none of it” (Martin, A Storm 891). Arya can
not only make her own choices, but is able to directly show her inner dialogue and reactions
Even Sansa benefits from this structure. Early in her childhood, a wandering singer took
refuge in Winterfell. When he left, Sansa’s father promised her many more performances by
wandering singers. Told from Eddard Stark’s perspective, or really any other character’s, this
would be the end of the story. Because this section is narrated by Sansa herself, albeit in third
person, we learn that she “Prayed, asking them to send a…singer, young and handsome” (Martin,
A Feast 206). Albeit not as dynamic or profound as her sister’s or mother’s agency, Sansa’s
actions here do give her character a sense of depth that would not be present otherwise.
development, which is critical to Martin’s elimination of the male gaze throughout A Game of
Thrones. Martin himself has made constant, explicit efforts to discuss this process and establish
his female characters as functional, emotive, competent individuals. As he makes sure to point
Some women hate the female characters. But importantly they hate them as people,
because of things that they’ve done, not because the character is underdeveloped. Male or
female, I believe in painting in shades of grey. All of the characters should be flawed,
they should all have good and bad, because that’s what I see. Yes, it’s fantasy, but the
The key way in which Martin develops the female characters is through his use of rotating
perspectives. In other words, Martin interrupts the male gaze by sharing the female characters’
viewpoints. Treating women only as passive or submissive objects for male characters to interact
with becomes entirely more difficult when the audience is privy to their emotional state, thought
processes, and motivations. Martin’s distinctive novel structure does this successfully, essentially
eliminating the threat of androcentricity by ensuring his female characters have just as much of a
Game of Thrones is a worldwide phenomenon. The series has been turned into a hit
television show, multiple video games, and has even been caricatured through comedy songs. As
always, however, attention comes with consequences. In this case, those consequences include
condemnation of the television series for its portrayal of women and traditional gender norms.
separate the television and book series. That Game of Thrones is defined by the objectification
and sexualization of women could not be farther from the truth. Rather, the fantasy book series
disrupts traditional androcentricity and eliminates the male gaze through careful character
development and rotating perspectives. To those who continuously posit that Game of Thrones is
and gratuitous feasting, and gratuitous description of clothes, and gratuitous heraldry,
because very little of this is necessary to advance the plot. But my philosophy is that plot
advancement is not what the experience of reading fiction is about. If all we care about it
advancing the plot, why read novels? We can just read Cliffs Notes. (qtd. in Majka).
Popular culture literature and rhetoric have significant influence over their audience. The
themes and messages present in many of these works have real-world applications, and –
whether consciously or not – present us with potential frames and action plans for our own lives.
Literature like Game of Thrones exists for more than entertainment value, it makes a valuable
Burke, Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Isha Books,
2013.
Ferreday, Debra. “Game of Thrones, Rape Culture, and Feminist Fandom.” Australian Feminist
Studies, vol. 30, no. 83, Mar. 2015, pp. 21-36. Academic Search Complete,
doi:10.1080/08164649.2014.998453.
Fisher, Mark, and Amber Jacobs. “Debating Black Swan: Gender and Horror.” Film Quarterly,
Flood, Alison. “Game of Thrones: An Epic Publishing Story.” The Guardian. 5 Aug. 2016,
www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/05/game-of-thrones-an-epic-publishing-story-
Foss, Sonja K. Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice. 5th ed. Waveland, 2018.
Foss, Sonja K., and Karen A. Foss. “The Construction of Feminine Spectatorship in Garrison
Garber, Megan. “Lyanna Mormont and the Slogan Feminism of Game of Thrones.” The Atlantic,
Hart, Roderick P., and Suzanne M. Daughton. Modern Rhetorical Criticism. 3rd ed. Pearson,
2005.
Majka, Katie. “Fight Like a Lady: The Promotion of Feminism in Game of Thrones.” Winter is
Selvi, R. Muthu. “Feminist Perspective in Nayantara Sanghal’s Novels The Day in Shadow and
A Time to Be Happy.” Language in India, vol. 16, no. 1, Jan 2016, pp. 168-184.
com.dewey2.library.denison.edu/docview/1648959725?accountid=15131.