Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

UJI BIVARIAT

➢ Normalitas

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Umur .154 55 .002 .933 55 .004
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Descriptives
Statistic Std. Error
Umur Mean 33.42 1.146
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 31.12
for Mean Upper Bound 35.72
5% Trimmed Mean 33.51
Median 35.00
Variance 72.211
Std. Deviation 8.498
Minimum 18
Maximum 47
Range 29
Interquartile Range 16
Skewness -.044 .322
Kurtosis -1.310 .634

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Pengetahuan .241 55 .000 .906 55 .000
PHBS .124 55 .034 .950 55 .023
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Descriptives
Statistic Std. Error
Pengetahuan Mean 12.45 .204
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 12.05
for Mean Upper Bound 12.86
5% Trimmed Mean 12.51
Median 13.00
Variance 2.290
Std. Deviation 1.513
Minimum 8
Maximum 15
Range 7
Interquartile Range 1
Skewness -.659 .322
Kurtosis .676 .634
PHBS Mean 30.91 .805
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 29.30
for Mean Upper Bound 32.52
5% Trimmed Mean 31.10
Median 30.00
Variance 35.603
Std. Deviation 5.967
Minimum 12
Maximum 40
Range 28
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -.480 .322
Kurtosis .282 .634
➢ Umur Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
Umur Responden Dibawah 30 Count 11 16 27
% within Umur
40.7% 59.3% 100.0%
Responden
Diatas 30 Count 10 18 28
% within Umur
35.7% 64.3% 100.0%
Responden
Total Count 21 34 55
% within Umur
38.2% 61.8% 100.0%
Responden

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .147a 1 .701
Continuity Correctionb .011 1 .916
Likelihood Ratio .147 1 .701
Fisher's Exact Test .785 .458
Linear-by-Linear
.144 1 .704
Association
N of Valid Casesb 55
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Umur
Responden (Dibawah 30 / 1.238 .416 3.679
Diatas 30)
For cohort PHBS
Responden = PHBS 1.141 .582 2.238
Kurang Baik
For cohort PHBS
.922 .607 1.399
Responden = PHBS Baik
N of Valid Cases 55

Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara umur responden dengan keadaan PHBS


Ha : ada hubungan antara umur responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara umur responden dengan PHBS.
➢ Jenis Kelamin Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
J_K :Laki-Laki Count 11 19 30
% within J_K 36.7% 63.3% 100.0%
Perempuan Count 10 15 25
% within J_K 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
Count 21 34 55
% within J_K 38.2% 61.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .064a 1 .800
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .064 1 .800
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .509
Linear-by-Linear
.063 1 .802
Association
N of Valid Casesb 55
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,55.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for J_K
.868 .292 2.587
(:Laki-Laki / Perempuan)
For cohort PHBS
Responden = PHBS .917 .468 1.795
Kurang Baik
For cohort PHBS
1.056 .693 1.607
Responden = PHBS Baik
N of Valid Cases 55

Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara Jenis Kelamin responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Ha : ada hubungan antara Jenis Kelamin responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara Jenis Kelamin responden dengan PHBS
➢ Pendidikan Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
Pendidikan Tamat SD Count 5 9 14
% within Pendidikan 35.7% 64.3% 100.0%
TamatSMP Count 0 4 4
% within Pendidikan .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Tamat SMA Count 12 19 31
% within Pendidikan 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%
Tamat PT Count 4 2 6
% within Pendidikan 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Total Count 21 34 55
% within Pendidikan 38.2% 61.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.573a 3 .206
Likelihood Ratio 5.876 3 .118
Linear-by-Linear
1.195 1 .274
Association
N of Valid Cases 55
a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1,53.
Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara Pendidikan responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Ha : ada hubungan antara Pendidikan responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara Pendidikan responden dengan PHBS
➢ Pekerjaan Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
Pekerjaan Tidak Bekerja Count 6 7 13
% within Pekerjaan 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
PNS Count 2 3 5
% within Pekerjaan 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
Pegawai Swasta Count 11 11 22
% within Pekerjaan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Buruh Count 2 13 15
% within Pekerjaan 13.3% 86.7% 100.0%
Total Count 21 34 55
% within Pekerjaan 38.2% 61.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.583a 3 .134
Likelihood Ratio 6.191 3 .103
Linear-by-Linear
2.143 1 .143
Association
N of Valid Cases 55
a. 3 cells (37,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1,91.

Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara Pekerjaan responden dengan keadaan PHBS


Ha : ada hubungan antara Pekerjaan responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara Pekerjaan responden dengan PHBS
➢ Pendapatan Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
Pendapatan Responden Dibawah UMR Count 18 28 46
% within Pendapatan
39.1% 60.9% 100.0%
Responden
Diatas UMR Count 3 6 9
% within Pendapatan
33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Responden
Total Count 21 34 55
% within Pendapatan
38.2% 61.8% 100.0%
Responden

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .107a 1 .743
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .109 1 .742
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .527
Linear-by-Linear
.105 1 .746
Association
N of Valid Casesb 55
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,44.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
Pendapatan Responden
1.286 .285 5.803
(Dibawah UMR / Diatas
UMR)
For cohort PHBS
Responden = PHBS 1.174 .435 3.165
Kurang Baik
For cohort PHBS
.913 .545 1.531
Responden = PHBS Baik
N of Valid Cases 55

Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara Pendapatan responden dengan keadaan PHBS


Ha : ada hubungan antara Pendapatan responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara Pendapatan responden dengan PHBS
➢ Pengetahuan Responden – PHBS

Crosstab
PHBS Responden
PHBS Kurang
Baik PHBS Baik Total
Pengetahuan responden Kurang Baik Count 8 14 22
% within Pengetahuan
36.4% 63.6% 100.0%
responden
Baik Count 13 20 33
% within Pengetahuan
39.4% 60.6% 100.0%
responden
Total Count 21 34 55
% within Pengetahuan
38.2% 61.8% 100.0%
responden

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .051a 1 .821
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .051 1 .821
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .524
Linear-by-Linear
.050 1 .822
Association
N of Valid Casesb 55
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
Pengetahuan responden .879 .288 2.680
(Kurang Baik / Baik)
For cohort PHBS
Responden = PHBS .923 .460 1.852
Kurang Baik
For cohort PHBS
1.050 .691 1.596
Responden = PHBS Baik
N of Valid Cases 55

Ho : tidak ada hubungan antara Pengetahuan responden dengan keadaan PHBS


Ha : ada hubungan antara Pengetahuan responden dengan keadaan PHBS
Berdasarkan person Chi-Square nilai Asymp, Sig. (2-sided) > 0,05, maka Ho diterima dan Ha ditolak.
Tidak ada hubungan antara Pengetahuan responden dengan PHBS

You might also like