Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Process Control

CME 321

Chapter 12

Transient Response of Simple Control


Systems

Dr. Hadil Abu Khalifeh


Control System for Stirred tank Heater

8-2
Block Diagram

Controller:
software component implements math
hardware component provides calibrated signal for actuator
Actuator:
physical (with dynamics) process triggered by controller
directly affects process
Sensor:
monitors some property of system and transmits signal back to controller
8-3
Block Diagram: Process

8-4
The Stirred tank Heater
 Consider the control system for the
heated, stirred tank that we previously
discussed.
 The block diagram is shown below.
 To reduce the number of symbols,
1/wC has been replaced by A

 Assume that the valve does not have any dynamic; G1 = Kv = 1.


 If Kv 1, we may simply replace Gc by Gc Kv
 Also assume unity-feedback system: m = 0 and Km = 1
Proportional Control: Load Change
 This time the set point remains fixed; TR = 0
 We are interested in the response of the
system to a change in the inlet stream
temperature, i.e., to a load change
 Remember that the goal of the control system in this case is to reject the effect
of disturbances and maintain the controlled variable, the tank temperature at the
set point.
 Since the set point has not changed from its steady-state value for this case
(T’ R = 0), we want T’ () = 0.
Overall closed – loop transfer function:
1
T ' (s)
 s  1 
1
'
Ti ( s ) 1  cK A s  1  K c A
s  1
 First order  Write in standard form for first order system
1
T ' (s) 1  Kc A A2 A2 
1

  where 1  Kc A
and
 1s  1
'
Ti ( s ) s 1
1  Kc A 
1 
1  Kc A
 The overall time constant 1 is the same as for set point changes.
 For a step change in inlet temperature: T’1 (s) = 1/s:

T ' (s) 
1 1 /(1  K c A)
s [ /(1  K c A)]s  1

T ' (t )  A2 1  e  t / 1 
and the ultimate (steady-state) value of T’ is:
1
T ' ()  lim sT ' ( s )   A2
s 0 1  Kc A
1
Offset  T ' R ()  T ' ()  0 
1  Kc A
1
Offset   ↑ Kc  ↓Offset
1  Kc A
Proportional – Integral Control: Load Change
In this case: Gc ( s)  K c (1  1 /  I s)
Overall closed – loop transfer function:
1
T ' (s)
 s  1
Ti ' ( s ) 1  K c (1  1 /  I s ) A
s  1
T ' ( s) Is
Rearranging: 
Ti ' ( s ) s  1  K c (1  1 /  I s ) A
Is
 PI changes the order
 I s  ( K c A I   I ) s  K c A
2
of the process.
In standard form of second order:
T ' ( s) ( I / K c A) s 
A1s
  12 s 2  2s  1
Ti ( s ) ( I / K c A) s 2   I (1  1 / K c A) s  1
'
I  I
where: A1  1  &  
1  I 1  Kc A
2  Kc A
Kc A Kc A

 For a step change in inlet temperature: T’1 (s) = 1/s:

A Impulse with  < 1:


T ' ( s)  2 2 1
 1 s  2s  1 1
T ' (t )  A1 
1
e t / 1 sin 1  2 t 
 1 1  2  1 

One of the most important advantages of


Offset  T ' R ()  T ' ()  0  0  0
PI control is the elimination of offset.
Proportional Control: Effect of Measurement Lag
Consider the same control system, the stirred-
tank heater, with a first-order measuring
element having a transfer function 1/(ms + 1).
Closed – loop transfer function for set-point
changes:
T ' (s) A1 ( m s  1)

TR' ( s )  22 s 2  2 2 2 s  1

Kc A  m   m 1
where: A1  2  
1  Kc A 1  Kc A & 2  m 1  K c A

In general, the response


becomes more oscillatory,
or less stable, as Kc or m
increases.
Proportional Control: Set-Point Change
The goal of the control system for this case is to force the system
to “track” the desired set point changes.
For proportional control: Gc = Kc
Overall closed – loop transfer function:
Kc A
 s  1 
T ' (s) Kc A
TR ( s ) 1  K c A s  1  K c A
s  1
 First order  Write in standard form for first order system
Kc A
T ' (s) 1  Kc A A1

 
T 'R ( s) s 1  1s  1
1  Kc A

where A1 
Kc A
and 1 
1  Kc A 1  Kc A

Fundamental characteristics of P-action:


1. Proportional action does not change the order of the process.
2. Proportional action respond faster than the open-loop process
 Speeding the process is the primary benefit of P-control
3. For a unit-step change in the set-point (T’R=1), the steady-
state gain is not equal to unity

 Offset is available
Kc A
Offset  T ' R ()  T ' ()  1 
1  Kc A
1
Offset 
1  Kc A
↑ Kc  ↓Offset Theoretically as Kc    Offset  zero
 STABILITY ????
Example: Proportional control for stirred-tank heater for set-
point tracking
Consider the stirred-tank heater shown in the
drawing. Determine the response of a closed-loop
proportional control system for Kc = 5, 10,
20, and 100 for a set point change of 5oC.
Determine the offset for each value of Kc .
 Impulse + step responses with  < 1:

1 1 2 t
  1  2 t 1 1  
2 
T ' (t )   e t / 
1
sin 1    1 
 e t / 
1
sin  1    tan 
1 1  
2
1   1  
2
 1  

Offset  T ' R ()  T ' ()  1  1  0

You might also like