Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Definition and Applications: Estimation of Physiological Requirements
2 Definition and Applications: Estimation of Physiological Requirements
2 Definition and Applications: Estimation of Physiological Requirements
Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) are the levels of intake of essential nutrients that, on the basis of scientific knowledge,
are judged by the Food and Nutrition Board to be adequate to meet the known nutrient needs of practically all healthy persons.
The first edition of the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) was published in 1943 during World War II with the objective
of “providing standards to serve as a goal for good nutrition.” It defined, in “accordance with newer information, the recommended
daily allowances for the various dietary essentials for people of different ages” (NRC, 1943). The origin of the RDAs a has been
described in detail by the chairman of the first Committee on Recommended Dietary Allowances (Roberts, 1958). The initial
publication has been revised at regular intervals; this is the tenth edition.
From their original application as a guide for advising “on nutrition problems in connection with national defense,” RDAs have
come to serve other purposes: for planning and procuring food supplies for population subgroups; for interpreting food
consumption records of individuals and populations; for establishing standards for food assistance programs; for evaluating the
adequacy of food supplies in meeting national nutritional needs; for designing nutrition education programs; for developing new
products in industry; and for establishing guidelines for nutrition labeling of foods. In most cases, there are only limited data on
which estimates of nutrient requirements can be based.
There is not always agreement among experts on the criteria for determining the physiological requirement for a nutrient. The
requirement for infants and children may be equated with the amount that will maintain a satisfactory rate of growth and
development; for an adult, it may be equated with an amount that will maintain body weight and prevent depletion of the nutrient
from the body, as judged by balance studies and maintenance of acceptable blood and tissue concentrations. For certain nutrients,
the requirement may be the amount that will prevent failure of a specific function or the development of specific deficiency signs
—an amount that may differ greatly from that required to maintain body stores. Thus, designation of the requirement for a given
nutrient varies with the criteria chosen.
Ideally, the first step in developing a nutrient allowance would be to determine the average physiological requirement of a healthy
and representative segment of each age and sex group according to stipulated criteria. Knowledge of the variability among the
individuals within each group would make it possible to calculate the amount by which the average requirement must be increased
to meet the need of virtually all healthy people. Unfortunately, experiments in humans are costly and time-consuming, and even
under the best of conditions, only small groups can be studied in a single experiment. Moreover, certain types of experiments are
not possible for ethical reasons. Thus, estimates of requirements and their variability must often be derived from limited
information.
If population requirements follow a normal, or Gaussian, distribution pattern (Figure 2-1), adding 2 standard deviations (SDs) to
the observed mean requirement would cover the needs of most (i.e., 98%) individuals. With the possible exception of the protein
FIGURE 2-1
Distributions of requirements for energy and nutrients. SOURCE: Beaton, 1985, with permission.
Allowances for energy are established in a different manner than the allowances for specific nutrients. The RDA for energy reflects
the mean population requirement for each age group. Energy needs vary from person to person; however, an additional allowance
to cover this variation would be inappropriate because it could lead to obesity in the person with average requirements. Over the
long term, a surplus of energy intake from any source is stored as fat, which may be detrimental to health.
Traditionally, RDAs have been established for essential nutrients only when data are sufficient to make reliable recommendations.
The subcommittee that prepared the ninth edition of the RDAs created the category “Safe and Adequate Intakes” for nutrients with
data bases insufficient for developing an RDA, but for which potentially toxic upper levels were known. In this category were three
vitamins (vitamin K, biotin, and pantothenic acid), six trace elements (copper, chromium, fluoride, manganese, molybdenum, and
selenium), and three electrolytes (sodium, potassium, and chloride). In this, the tenth edition, only minimal requirements are given
for the electrolytes, and vitamin K and selenium have been advanced to RDA status.
Diets of various types can be devised to meet recognized nutritional needs. However, RDAs should be provided from a selection of
foods that are acceptable and palatable to ensure consumption. In addition to being a source of nutrients, food has psychological
RDAs relate to physiological requirements, where these are known. On the whole, the RDA committees tend to err on the side of
generosity, since there is little evidence that small surpluses of nutrients are detrimental, whereas consistent uncompensated
deficits, even small ones, over a long period can lead to deficiencies. Deficiency states in humans and animals have been reported
for nutrients accorded RDA status. Such deficiencies are preventable or curable by the amounts of nutrients supplied by a well-
selected diet. In the few cases where deficiency is commonly observed (e.g., iron deficiency in women), food fortification and
individual supplementation are appropriate.
Doses greatly exceeding the amount of a nutrient present in foods are usually needed to obtain a therapeutic response.
The specificity of the pharmacological action is often different from the physiological function.
Chemical analogues of the nutrient that are often most effective pharmacologically may have little or no nutritional
activity.
REFERENCE INDIVIDUALS
RDAs shown in the Summary Table at the end of this volume are expressed in terms of Reference Individuals in different age and
sex classes. The heights and weights of the Reference Individuals could have been set at some arbitrary ideal (e.g., 70 kg for adult
men and 55 kg for adult women, as in the ninth edition). However, since weight is used as the basis for setting RDAs for many
nutrients, the figures presented for adults in the Summary Table are the actual medians for the U.S. population of the designated
age, as reported in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). Table 2-1 shows the actual
weights for heights of adults in the United States. The use of these figures does not imply that the height-to-weight ratios for this
population are ideal. The medians for those under 19 years of age were taken from Hamill et al. (1979) (Table 2-2). For groups or
individuals with body mass substantially different from that of the Reference Individual, allowances can be adjusted using the
median weight appropriate to the observed height.
TABLE 2-1
Weights for Height of Adults in the United States.
TABLE 2-2
Weight and Height of Males and Females Up to 18 Years in the United States.
The Summary Table in this report is similar to those in previous editions but features several changes. RDAs are now provided for
Since the previous edition, new data on breast milk production have emerged (e.g., Butte et al., 1984; Chandra, 1982; Hofvander et
al., 1982; Neville et al., 1988). Average milk consumption for infants born at term is now accepted to be 750 ml for the first 6
months (with a coefficient of variation of approximately 12.5%), and 600 ml during the next 6 months when complementary foods
are given. Maternal production is slightly higher than infant consumption, but it is subsumed within the variation. Therefore, the
subcommittee accepts 750 ml and 600 ml as figures for both average milk production and consumption.
Recommendations for infants are subdivided into the first and second 6 months of life. Further subdivision of these age groups can
be justified on physiological grounds, but the information base is not yet sufficient to establish nutrient allowances with such
precision. RDAs for infants up to 6 months old are based primarily on the amounts of nutrients provided by 750 ml of human milk,
plus an additional 25% (2 SDs) to allow for variance. RDAs during the second 6 months of life are consistent with infant feeding
practices in the United States, i.e., increasing amounts of mixed solid foods are given to supplement milk or formula during that
period.
In applying the RDAs, one should remember that a given person may be physiologically younger or older than his or her
chronological age would suggest and that it becomes increasingly difficult to define the term healthy with advancing age. There is
some evidence that the elderly have altered requirements for some nutrients. For example, intestinal absorption, particularly of
minerals, may be impaired. However, there is no evidence that an increased intake of nutrients above the RDAs is necessary, or
that higher intakes will prevent the changes associated with aging.
Climate
Prolonged exposure to high temperatures may reduce activity, energy expenditure, and therefore food intake. Except under extreme
conditions, however, it is unlikely that this reduced food intake would greatly affect the nutriture of the individual. Sweat losses
may need to be considered, as noted below.
In hot environments, activity increases water and salt losses through sweating and, if prolonged, can also lead to measurable losses
of other essential nutrients. Special attention should be given to the immediate need for water under such conditions.
Clinical Considerations
RDAs apply to healthy persons. They do not cover special nutritional needs arising from metabolic disorders, chronic diseases,
injuries, premature birth, other medical conditions, and drug therapies.
Data on the role of diet as a causal or contributing factor in chronic and degenerative disease lead to recommendations derived
through approaches different from those used in developing RDAs for specific nutrients. Reference is made to relationships
between dietary patterns and health in certain chapters; a detailed evaluation of relationships between dietary patterns and health
can be found in the Food and Nutrition Board's publication Diet and Health (NRC, 1989) and The Surgeon General's Report on
Nutrition and Health (DHHS, 1988).
In the Summary RDA Table at the end of this volume, nutrient intakes are expressed as quantities of a nutrient for a Reference
Individual per day. However, the terms per day and daily should be interpreted as average intake over time. The length of time over
which averaging should be achieved depends on the nutrient, the size of the body pool, and the rate of turnover of that nutrient.
Some nutrients, such as vitamins A and B12, can be stored in relatively large quantities and are degraded slowly. Others, such as
thiamin, are turned over rapidly, and total deprivation in a person can lead to relatively rapid development of symptoms (i.e., in
days or weeks, rather than in months). If the requirement for a nutrient is not met on a particular day, body stores or a surplus
consumed shortly thereafter will compensate for the inadequacy. For most nutrients, RDAs are intended to be average intakes over
at least 3 days; for others, e.g., vitamins A and B12), they may be averaged over several months.
Nutrient intake varies from day to day among individuals and for different nutrients. For example, the day-to-day variability in
intake of some nutrients, such as protein and thiamin, is low, whereas vitamin A intake is highly variable. For this reason, dietary
surveys that depend on single 24-hour recalls provide valid data only for the population average intake. A person who on one day
may have consumed little of a given nutrient may on a subsequent day ingest considerably more. Only a time-averaged intake need
If a group average intake approximates that of the calculated group RDA, some persons within the group are consuming less than
the RDA and others more. Except for energy, in which the average requirement of the population group is recommended, the
RDAs are intended to be sufficiently generous to encompass the presumed (albeit unmeasured) variability in requirement among
people. Thus, if a population's habitual intake approximates or exceeds the RDA, the probability of deficiency is quite low. Such
comparisons between intake and RDA cannot, however, be used to conclude confidently that the requirements for a given person
have or have not been met, because there is no assurance that the high (and low) consumers are the high (and low) requirers of the
nutrient in question. Without knowing the distribution of intakes and requirements, there is no way to verify probable deficiency
within a group. If individual intakes can be averaged over a sufficiently long period and compared with the RDA, the probable risk
of deficiency for that individual can be estimated.
NUTRITIONAL ALLOWANCES AS GUIDELINES FOR FOOD SUPPLIES AND FOR HEALTH AND
WELFARE PROGRAMS
The RDAs have been used by federal, state, and local health and welfare agencies as a starting point for determining the desirable
nutrient content of foods and meals for school feeding programs, special food services, and various child-feeding programs, and as
a basis for licensing and certification standards for such group facilities as day-care centers, nursing homes, and residential homes.
The attainment of RDAs should not be the only objective of food procurement or meal design for these programs. Since RDAs
have not been set for all nutrients, meeting the RDAs from a wide variety of food classes is the best assurance that needs for non-
RDA nutrients will be met. The foods selected must also be palatable and acceptable in other ways so they will be consumed over
long periods in the required quantities. Although the subcommittee is aware that changes in the RDAs from the previous edition
might have an impact on food assistance programs, it believes that modifications to these programs should be based on the
recommendations in the Food and Nutrition Board's report Diet and Health (NRC, 1989) as well. Together, the RDAs and the Diet
and Health recommendations should be considered the appropriate basis for diet planning.
In planning meals or food supplies, it is technically difficult and biologically unnecessary to design a single day's diet that contains
all the RDAs for all the nutrients. Nor is there biological reason for expecting that each meal should contain a fixed percentage of
an RDA for a nutrient. As stated previously, the RDAs are goals to be achieved over time—at least 3 days for nutrients that turn
over rapidly, whereas one or several months might be adequate for more slowly metabolized nutrients. In practice, menus for
congregate feeding should be designed so that the RDAs are met in a 5- to 10-day rotation.
REFERENCES
Beaton, G.H. 1985. Uses and limits of the use of the Recommended Dietary Allowances for evaluating dietary intake
data. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 41: 155–164. [PubMed: 3966417]
Butte, N.F., C. Garza , E.O. Smith, and B.L. Nichols. 1984. Human milk intake and growth in exclusively breast-fed
infants. J. Pediatr. 104: 187–195. [PubMed: 6694010]
Chandra, R.K. 1982. Physical growth of exclusively breast-fed infants. Nutr. Res. 2: 275–276.
DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 1988. The Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 727 pp.
Hamill, P.V.V., T.A. Drizd, C.L. Johnson, R.B. Reed, A.F. Roche, and W.M. Moore. 1979. Physical growth: National
Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32: 607–629. [PubMed: 420153]
Neville, M.C., R. Keller, J. Seacar, V. Lutes, M. Neifert, C. Casey, J. Allen, and P. Archer. 1988. Studies in human
lactation: milk volumes in lactating women during the onset of lactation and full lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 48: 1375–
1386. [PubMed: 3202087]
NRC (National Research Council). 1943. Recommended Dietary Allowances. Report of the Food and Nutrition Board,
Reprint and Circular Series No. 115. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 6 pp.
NRC (National Research Council). 1982. Diet, Nutrition, and Cancer. Report of the Committee on Diet, Nutrition, and
Cancer, Assembly of Life Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 478 pp.
NRC (National Research Council). 1986. Nutrient Adequacy: Assessment Using Food Consumption Surveys. Report of
the Subcommittee on Criteria for Dietary Evaluation, Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life Sciences. National
Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 146 pp.
NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. Report of the
Committee on Diet and Health, Food and Nutrition Board, Commission on Life Sciences. National Academy Press,
Washington, D.C. 750 pp.
Roberts, L.J. 1958. Beginnings of the Recommended Dietary Allowances. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 34: 903–908. [PubMed:
13575091]
Footnotes
a Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) should not be confused with U.S. Recommended Daily Allowances (USRDAs)—a
set of values derived from the 1968 RDAs by the Food and Drug Administration as standards for nutritional labeling.
Publication Details
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the National Academy of Sciences.
Publisher
NLM Citation
National Research Council (US) Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the Recommended Dietary Allowances. Recommended Dietary Allowances: 10th
Edition. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1989. 2, Definition and Applications.