Ductility Test (After Tfot) : (As Per IS: 1208)

DUCTILITY TEST(After TFOT)
(As per IS: 1208)
Name of work : RE-SURFACING OF RUNWAY AND ALLIED WORK SERVICES AT AF STATION JAMNAGAR GUJARAT
Contract Agreement No. : CE(AF)G/JAM/39 OF 2018-2019
Name of the Contractor : KCC Buildcon Pvt Ltd
Client : Military Engineer Services
Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Location/Source:…………….. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
Make/Brand ……………. Date of Testing: ………..……
_____________________________________________________________________________
Room Temperature : .……ºC
Period of Cooling at Room Temperature : …..…min (30min- 40min)
Period of Cooling in Water Bath (before Trimming) : ……..min (Minimum 30 min)
Period of Cooling in Water Bath (After Trimming) : ……..min (85 min - 95 min)
Actual Test Temperature : 27ºC
Rate of Pull : ……..mm/min
OBSERVATION TABLE
SL. Description Test Mould No. Average Permissible Limit

NO. Value (cm)
Obtained
1 2 3 (cm)
1 Ductility
(in cm)
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
SOFTENING POINT TEST

(As per IS: 1205)
Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: PMB-40…………….… Test No…01.……

Location/Source: SITE LAB…………….. Date of Sampling: ..09.04.2018
Make/Brand …MARUTI BITUMEN.…………. Date of Testing: 09.04.2018
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sample Description Temperature at which the Average Value of Permissible Limit

No. ball touches the bottom Softening Point of Softening
plate (ºC) (ºC)
(ºC)
MIN-75
1 Ball No.-1 83.2 83.6
2 Ball No.- 2 84.1
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Rep of Maruti Bitumen J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
SOFTENING POINT TEST

(TFOT Test on Residue As per IS: 15462-2004)
Contract Agreement No. : CE(AF)/NGP/CHK/34 OF 2015-2016
Name of the Contractor : PNC Infratech Limited
Type of Sample: …………….… Test No….……

Location/Source: …………….. Date of Sampling: ...………......
Make/Brand ……………. Date of Testing: ………..………
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sample Description Temperature at which the Average Value of Permissible Limit

No. ball touches the bottom Softening Point of Softening
plate (ºC) (ºC)
(ºC)
1 Ball No.-1
2 Ball No.- 2
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
FLASH & FIRE POINT TEST

(As per IS: 1209)
Name of work : RE-SURFACING OF RUNWAY AND ALLIED WORKS SERVICES AT AF STATION JAMNAGAR
Name of the Contractor : M/S. KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD

OBSERVATION TABLE
Description Trial -1 Trial-2 Average Value Permissible Limit

(º C) (º C)
FLASH POINT
(º C)
FIRE POINT
(º C)
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

PENETRATION TEST FOR BITUMEN/PMB
(As per IS: 1203)

Type of Sample: PMB-40……………… Test No…01.……

Location/Source: SITE LAB…………….. Date of Sampling:09.04.2018 .
Make/Brand -MARUTI BITUMEN……………. Date of Testing: 09.04.2018
OBSERVATION TABLE
Penetration (1/10mm) Permissible

Trial No. Limits
Specimen I Specimen II
46 30-50
1.
2. 43
44
3.
44.3
Average Penetration
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Rep. of Maruti Bitumen J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
GE(P)AF CHAKERI
PENETRATION TEST FOR BITUMEN/PMB

(TFOT Test on Residue As per IS: 15462-2004)


Location/Source: …………….. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
OBSERVATION TABLE
Penetration (1/10mm) Permissible

Trial No. Limits
Specimen I Specimen II
1.
2.
3.
Reduction
Average Penetration र
35% MAX.
AT 25 oC
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
DETERMINATION OF SOFTENING POINT FOR BITUMEN/PMB

(As per IS: 1205)


Location/Source…………….. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
OBSERVATION SHEET
Description Temperature at which Ball-I Temperature at which Ball- Min. Permissible

touches the bottom plate II touches the bottom plate Limit
(oC) (oC) (oC)
Softening point, oC
Average
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
DETERMINATION OF SOFTENING POINT FOR BITUMEN/PMB

(As per IS: 1205)


OBSERVATION TABLE
Description Temperature at which Ball-I Temperature at which Ball- Min. Permissible
touches the bottom plate II touches the bottom plate Limit
(oC) (oC) (oC)
Softening point, oC
Average
Elapsed Ball I Ball II

time, Temperature, Temperature,
o o
minutes C C
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMEN/PMB

(As per IS: 1202)


OBSERVATION TABLE
S.
No.
Description Specimen-I Specimen-II
1. Mass of Specific gravity Bottle (a),gm
2. Mass of specific gravity with Water (b),gm
3. Mass of Specific gravity bottle about half

filled with Bitumen (c),gm
4. Mass of specific gravity bottle about half

filled with the material and rest with water
(d),gm
5. Specific gravity of Bitumen= (c-a)/(b-a)-(d-c)
6. Average Specific Gravity
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………
DETERMINATION OF GLASS FIBER IN GLASS GRID


OBSERVATION TABLE
S.
No.
Description Specimen-I Specimen-II
1. Mass of glass grid of 1 sqf piece (a),g

2. Mass of glass grid of quarter of 1 sqf piece
(b),g
Test : Piece of glass grid is put to flame till all organic content burnt.
Result : White shiney colour glass fiber observed.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………
Re-surfacing / Strengthening of Runway at AF Station Chakeri, Kanpur

Re-surfacing / Strengthening of Runway at AF Station Chakeri, Kanpur
ELASTIC RECOVERY TEST FOR PMB
(As per IS : 15462-2004)
Type of Sample: PMB-40 Test No: 1

Location/Source: SITE LAB Date of Sampling: 09.04.2018
Make/Brand: MARUTI BITUMEN Date of Testing: 09.04.2018
OBSERVATION TABLE
Specimen Length of Thread (cm) Difference % Average Min.

No. Recovery % Recovery Permissible
Limit
(%)
Before Cut After Cut

10 1.0 9.0 90
I
10 0.1 9.1 91 85% Min.

90.66 at 15 oC
II
10 0.1 9.1 91
III
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
Rep. of Maruti J.E.(Civ) Engr-in-charge
ELASTIC RECOVERY TEST FOR PMB

(TFOT Test on Residue As per IS : 15462-2004)


OBSERVATION TABLE
Specimen Length of Thread (cm) Difference Recovery Average Min.

No. (cm) % Recovery Permissible
Limit
% (%)
Before Cut After Cut
II 50% MIN.
AT 25 oC
III
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………….
SEPARATION TEST FOR PMB

(As per IS:15462)


OBSERVATION TABLE
Description Temp. in oC, Ball-I Temp. in oC, Ball-II Max. Permissible

(Top of the tube) (Bottom of the tube) Limit
(oC)
Softening point, oC
Difference/ Separation, oC
3 ºC MAX
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………….
SEPARATION TEST FOR PMB

(As per IRC: SP: 23)


Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION SHEET
Description Temp. in oC, Ball-I Temp. in oC, Ball-II Max.

(Top of the tube) (Bottom of the tube) Permissible
Limit
(oC)
Softening point, oC
Difference/ Separation, oC
Elapsed time, Ball I Ball II
(minutes) Temperature, Temperature,
o o
C C
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………….
BINDER CONTENT & GRADATION AFTER EXTRACTION OF BITUMINOUS MIX
Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI , KANPUR


Binder Content:
1. Weight of bowl M1 (g) 7. Wt. of Fine material ,Recovered

from the extract (W3) (g)
2. Initial weight of filter paper (m1) 8. Wt. of Filter Paper after
(g) extraction m2 (g)
3 Weight of bowl + Mix sample 9. Increase in Wt. of filter paper

M2 (g) After extract. W4 = m2-m1 (g)
4. Weight of Mix sample W1 10. Bitumen Content (%) =

= M2-M1 (g) W1-(W2+W3+W4)/W1*100
5. Weight of bowl + Aggregate 11. Permissible limit (%)

After extraction M3 (g)
6. Weight of Agg. After extraction
W2 = M3-M1 (g)
Sieve Analysis: Wt. of sample: ………….
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Percentage Percentage Permissible Limits
(mm) (gm) Retained (gm) Retaining (%) Passing (%)
BITUMEN EXTRACTION TEST


OBSERVATION
SL
No. Description Unit Observation
1 Weight of Empty Mould ( M1 ) g
2 Weight of Mould + Sample (M2) g
3 Weight of Sample (W1) = M2-M1 g
4 Initial Weight of Filter Paper ( m1) g
5 Weight of Mould + Dry Sample ( M3) g
6 Weight of Sample After Extraction (W2) = M3-M1 g
7 Final Weight of Filter Paper after Extraction ( m2) g
8 Increase in Weight of Filter Paper ( W3)=m2-m1 g
9 Bitumen % = W1-(W2+W3)/W1x100 %
11 Average of Bitumen %
12 Permissible limit %
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………

DETERMINATION OF LOSS IN MASS FOR BITUMEN/PMB
(As per IS: 1212)
Name of work : RE-SURFACING OF RUNWAY AND ALLIED WORK SERVICES AT AF STATION JAMNAGAR
GUJARAT

Location/Source:……………….. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
Maintain Temp/Specified Temp.……..… /(163±5 oC) Date of Testing: ………..……
S. No. Description Unit Trial 1 Trial 2 LIMIT
%
1 Mass of Empty Container (W1) g
2 Mass of Sample + Container (W2) g
3 Wt. of Sample W= W2-W1 g
4 Wt. of Sample + Container after 5 hours (W3) g
5 Percentage Loss on Heating %

(W2 – W3)/W *100
6 Average Percentage Loss in Mass %
1.0% MAX.
OBSERVATION TABLE
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Curing Compound Spraying Test

Source /Location:…………….. Layer No………………..
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.No. DESCRIPTION UNIT TRIAL-1 TRIAL-2
1 Initial weight of Plate W1 Kg
2 Area of Plate A m2
3 Weight of Plate after spread of Kg

curing compound W2
4 Weight of Spreaded curing Kg
compound W3 =W2-W1
5 Rate of Spray W3/A Kg/m2
6 Average of Spray Kg/m2
7 Permissible Limit Kg/m2 0.200 Kg/m²
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
Prime / Tack Coat Test

Type of Sample: …PMB-40…………… Test No…01.
Source /Location: TRAILBAY AT ATC TOWER Date of Sampling: 09.05.18
Date of Testing: …09.05.18
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.No. DESCRIPTION UNIT TRIAL-1 TRIAL-2
1 Initial weight of Plate W1 Kg 2.390 2.819
2 Area of Plate A m2 0.305 0.305
3 Weight of Plate after Prime / Tack Kg 2.819 3.251

coat W2
4 Weight of Prime / Tack coat Kg 0.429 0.432
W3=W2-W1
5 Prime / Tack coat W3/A Kg/m2 1.407 1.416
6 Average of Prime / Tack coat Kg/m2 1.4115
7 Permissible Limit Kg/m2 1.40
Remarks: …SAMPLE PASSED
Rep.OF MARUTI BITUMEN J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF MIX

(As per CA NO.CE(AF)SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14)

Type of Sample: . Test No….

Location/Source: . Date of Sampling: .
Tested by……… Date of Testing: .
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.NO. Description Unit Trial
1 Weight of empty flask with cover w1 g

2 Weight of cover plate and flask filled g
with water D
3 Weight of flask with dry sample w2 g
4 Weight of dry sample in air g
A =w2-w1
5 Weight of flask ,cover plate, g
sample and water E
6 Maximum theoretical specific gravity of -
mix Gmm =A/[A+D-E]
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
GE(P)AF CHAKERI CWE AF CHAKERI JP SINGH JAHEER ABBAS

Wg. Cdr. LT. COL.
J D. RRMT Dir(SO1)
E in C’s Br
MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF MIX



Source /Location:…………….. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
OBSERVATION TABLE
2 Weight of cover plate and flask filled with water D g

A =w2-w1
5 Weight of flask ,cover plate, sample and water E g
6 Maximum theoretical specific gravity of mix Gmm -

=A/[A+D-E]
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
AGGREGATE STRIPPING VALUE TEST

(As per IS: 6241)

Location/Source: …………….. Date of Sampling: ...………....
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.
No. Test No. 1 2 Permissible
Limit
1 Weight of Aggregate Passing 20 mm IS Sieve and

Retained on 12.5 mm IS Sieve (gm)
2 Weight of Bitumen (5%) of weight of Aggregate

(gm)
3 Stripping Value ( After Immersing the mix in water

and keeping in water bath at 40 ºC for 24 hour) (%)
4 Retained CoatingValue (%)
5 Average of Retained Coating Value (%) 95% MIN.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………
Test of Clay Lumps

(As per IS: 2386 Part-II)


Size of Particles making Weight of Sample Size of sieve for sieving

Up the Samples(mm) Min. Residue of Clay Lumps
F.Agg. retaind on 1.18 mm 100 g Min. 850 micron

Over 4.75 mm to 10mm 1000g 2.36mm
,, 10mm to 20mm 2000g 4.75mm
,, 20mm to 40mm 3000g 4.75mm
,, 40mm 5000g 4.75mm
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.No. DESCRIPTION UNIT DETAIL
1 Weight of sample Material W1 g
2 Weight of Retained Material W2 g
3 Clay Lumps L= (W1-W2/W1)*100 %
Permissible Limit : 1%Max. (For

& RCC As per IS:383)
. 4%Max.(For DLC As per CA)
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
Deleterious Content Test



OBSERVATION TABLE
1 Weight of sample Material W1 Kg
Weight of dried sample Material after wash

with 75 micron IS Sieve W2
2 Weight of deleterious Material W3 = W2 –W1 Kg
3 Deleterious MaterialValue (W3/W1)*100 %
4 Permissible Limit % 5% Max. for C. Agg.

& F. Agg.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
Deleterious Value Test



OBSERVATION TABLE
1 Weight of sample Material W1 g
2 Weight of dried sample Material after wash g

with 75 micron IS Sieve W2
3 Weight of deleterious Material W3 = W1 –W2 g
4 Deleterious Material Value = (W3/W1)*100 %
5 Permissible Limit %
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
BULK DENSITY OF AGGREGATE

(As per IS: 2386 Part-III)


S. No. Details Unit Trial 1 Trial 2 Average
Bulk Density
(Kg/l)
1 Wt. of Empty density measure(W1) Kg
2 Wt. of material + density measure (W2) Kg
3 Wt. of material W= W2-W1 Kg
4 Volume of density measure (V) lit
5 Bulk density W/ V Kg / lit

OBSERVATION TABLE
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
MOISTURE CONTENT


S.
No. Description Unit Trial 1 Trial 2 Average
1 Mass of Empty container with lid (W1)
g
2 Mass of container with lid + Sample material (W2)
g
3 Mass of container with lid + Dry Sample material
(W3) g
4 Weight of water (W2-W3)
g
5 Weight of Sample material (W3-W1)
g
6 Natural Moisture Content =
(W2-W3)/ (W3-W1)*100 %
OBSERVATION TABLE
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………
FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATION INDEX

(As per IS: 2386 Part-I)

Type of Sample……………… Test No……………….

Location/Source: …………….. Date of Sampling:…………….
OBSERVATION TABLE
SIZE OF SIEVE WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF
SL. FRACTION AGG. IN AGG. IN EACH AGG.IN
NO. PASSING RETAINED CONSISTING EACH FRACTION EACH
THROUGH ON SIEVE OF ATLEAST FRACTION RETAINED ON FRACTION
SIEVE (mm) (mm) 200 RETAINED PASSING THICKNESS RETAINED
PIECES THICKNESS GAUGE ON LENGTH
(gm) GAUGE (gm) GAUGE
(gm) (gm)
A B C D E F
1 63 50
2 50 40
3 40 31.5
4 31.5 25
5 25 20
6 20 16
7 16 12.5
8 12.5 10
9 10 6.3
TOTAL
(A) FLAKINESS INDEX (F.I ) = Total wt.of flaky material x 100 = ……………...….%
Total wt. Sample
(B) ELONGATION INDEX (E.I) = Total wt.of Elongation material x 100 = …..………...…. %
Total wt.ofnon flaky material
(C) COMBINED F.I & E.I = (A) + (B) =………………...…%
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT = ……….. %…( Flakiness)&………..% (Combined)
SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR 40MM AGGREGATE

(As per IS: 383)


Location/Source: …………….. Date of sampling……………
Wt. of sample……………….. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.No. Sieve Wt.retained Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

Size(mm) (gm) wt.retained Cumulative wt. passing Limits
(gm) wt.retained (%) (%)
(%)
1 63 100
2 40 85-100
3 20 0-20
4 10 0-5
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

(As per IS: 383)


Location/Source: …………….. Date of sampling……………
Wt. of sample……………….. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
S.No. Sieve Wt.retained Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

Size(mm) (gm) wt.retained Cumulative wt. passing Limits
(%)
1 40 100
2 20 85-100
3 10 0-20
4 4.75 0-5
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR 12.5MM AGGREGATE

(AS per IS 383 Table No. IV)


Location/Source: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
Weight of Sample…………….. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % of % Passing Permissible

(mm) (gm) Retained (gm) Cumulative Limits
Wt. Retained
16 100
12.5 85-100
10 0-45
4.75 0-10
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

(As per IS: 383)
GUJARAT
Name of the Contractor : KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD

Wt. of sample……………. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sr.N Sieve Wt.retained Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

o. Size(mm) (gm) wt.retained Cumulative wt. passing Limits
(%)
1 12.5 100
2 10 85-100
3 4.75 0-20
4 2.36 0-5
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR 26.5 MM AGGREGATE
(As per IS: 383)

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No………..

OBSERVATION TABLE
Sr. Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

No. retained (gm) wt. retained Cumulative wt. passing Limits
(gm) wt. retained (%) (%)
(%)
1 31.5 100
2 26.5 85-100
3 20 0-30
4 10 0-5
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SAND
(As per IS: 383)


Location/Source: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...………......
Weight of Sample……………… Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative % Cum. Wt. % Wt. Permissible
No. (mm) (gm) Wt. Retained Retained Passing Limits
(gm) (Zone –II)
(%)
1. 10 100
2. 4.75 90-100
3. 2.36 75-100
4. 1.18 55-90
5. 0.600 35-59
6. 0.300 8-30
7. 0.150 0-10
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF STONE DUST

(As per IS: 383)


OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible Limits (%)

size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
Zone –II Zone –III Zone –IV
10 100 100 100
4.75 90-100 90-100 95-100
2.36 75-100 85-100 95-100
1.18 55-90 75-100 90-100
0.600 35-59 60-79 80-79
0.300 8-30 12-40 15-50
0.150 0-20 0-20 0-20
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
SILT CONTENT OF FINE SAND (GANGA SAND)


vehicle no ………..…… Date of testing………..
Qty. :-………………………..
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sr. Initial reading Volume of settled sample % age of Silt - Max. limit
No. After 3hrs (L2/L1) X 100 (%)
Total volume of Volume of silt Volume of sand

sand & silt in ml in ml(L2) in ml(L1)
1 100
2 100
3 Average of Silt Content % MAX.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab. Tech. Lab Incharge Contractor’s Rep.
SAND EQUIVALENT VALUE

(As per IS: 2720 Part XXXVII)


OBSERVATION TABLE
Description Trial 1 Trial 2
Sand reading, A
Clay reading, B
Sand Equivalent Value (A/B) x 100
Average Sand Equivalent Value
Permissible Limit
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
GRADATION WITHOUT PULVERISATION

(As per MORTH Table 400-4)


Weight of Sample……………. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Size Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

(mm) Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing Limits
(gm) (gm) (%) (%)
53.0 100
37.5 95-100
19.0 45-100
9.50 35-100
4.75 25-100
0.600 8-65
0.300 5-40
0.075 0-10
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………..
COMBINED GRADATION OF AGG. FOR WET MIX MACADAM



Weight of Sample…………….. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Size Wt. Retained (g) Cumulative Wt. Percentage Percentage Permissible
(mm) Retained (g) Retained Passing Limits as per
(%) (%) CA
53 100
45 95-100
22.4 60-80
11.2 40-60
4.75 25-40
2.36 15-30
0.6 8-22
.
0.075 0-8
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MOORUM

(As per SSR-2009 Part I Cl.20.A.15B.4A )


Location/Source: …………….. Date of sampling……………….
Wt. of Sample………………. Date of Testing……………….
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Percentage Percentage Permissible
(mm) (gm) Retained (gm) Retained Passing Limits
(%) (%)
53.0 100
37.5 95-100
19.0 45-100
9.5 35-100
4.75 25-100
0.600 08-65
0.300 05-40
0.075 0-10
GRAVEL=………………% SAND=………………..% SILT=…………………%
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………..
WATER ABSORPTION OF COARSE & FINE AGGREGATE

Type of Sample: …………… Test No….……

Location/Source: …………… Date of Sampling:………..
Date of Testing: ………….
…… MM AGGREGATE
Sl. No. SSD wt of Sample (A) Oven Dry wt of Sample Water Absorption Average Permissible
(B) (A-B)/B x100 Limits
1 Max. %
2
……MM AGGREGATE
1 Max. %
2
……MM AGGREGATE
1 Max. %
2
STONE DUST
1 Max. %
2
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
MOISTURE CONTENT OF COARSE& FINE AGGREGATE

Type of Sample: …DLC Test No….……

Location/Source: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...………...
20.00 MM AGGREGATE
Sl. No. Wt. of SSD Sample Wt. of Oven Dry Water Absorption Average Permissible
(A) Sample (B) (A-B)/B x100 Limits
1 Max. %
2
10.00MM AGGREGATE
1 Max. %
2
6.00MM AGGREGATE
1 Max. %
2
SAND
1 Max. %
2
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
COMBINED GRADATION OF AGG. FOR DBM (Grade 1st)

(As per IRC : 111-2009)

Weight of Sample………………g Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

(gm) (%) (%) (%)
1 45 100
2 37.5 95-100
3 26.5 63-93
4 13.2 55-75
5 4.75 38-54
6 2.36 28-42
7 0.300 7-21
8 0.075 2-8
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED GRADATION OF AGG. FOR DBM (Grade 2nd)

(As per IRC : 111-2009)

OBSERVATION TABLE

(gm) (%) (%) (%)
1 37.5 100
2 26.5 90-100
3 19.0 71-95
4 13.2 56-80
5 4.75 38-54
6 2.36 28-42
7 0.300 7-21
8 0.075 2-8
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DAC(Grade 1st )

(As per IRC : 111-2009)
Type of Sample: …. Test No…
Location/Source: … Date of Sampling:
Weight of Sample…………….g Date of Testing :
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible Limits

Size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing (%)
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
26.5
100
19.0
90 - 100
13.2
59 - 79
9.5
52 - 72
4.75
35 - 55
2.36
28 - 44
1.18
20 - 34
0.600
15 - 27
0.300
10 - 20
0.150
5 - 13
0.075
2-8
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DAC(Grade IInd)

(As per IRC : 111-2009)
Type of Sample:………. Test No:

Location/Source: ……… Date of Sampling: …………..
Weight of Sample……………g Date of Testing : …………..
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible Limits

Size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing (%)
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
19 100
13.2 90 - 100
9.5 70 - 88
4.75 53 - 71
2.36 42 - 58
1.18 34 - 48
0.600 26 - 38
0.300 18 - 28
0.150 12 - 20
0.075 4 -10
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
Maruti Bitumen J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR BM (Grade 2nd)

(As per MORT&H Table 500-7)


OBSERVATION TABLE

(gm) (%) (%) (%)
1 26.5 100
2 19.0 90-100
3 13.2 56-88
4 4.75 16-36
5 2.36 4-19
6 0.300 2-10
7 0.075 0-8
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR SDAC (Grade 2nd)

(As per IRC : 111-2009)
Type of Sample:………. Test No:

Location/Source: ……… Date of Sampling: …………..
Weight of Sample……………g Date of Testing : …………..
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Wt. Retained Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible Limits

Size (gm) Wt. Retained Retained Passing (%)
(mm) (gm) (%) (%)
13.2 100
9.5 90 - 100
4.75 35 - 51
2.36 24 - 39
1.18 15 - 30
0.300 9 - 19
0.075 3-8
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE TEST

(As per IS: 2386 Part-IV)


OBSERVATION TABLE
S.
No. Test No. 1 2 Permissible
Limit
(%)
1 Mass of Aggregate(Oven Dry) Passing 12.5 mm IS Sieve
and Retained on 10 mm IS Sieve (Wa) (gm)
2 Mass of Fraction Retained on 2.36 mm IS Sieve(Wb)

(gm)
3 Mass of Fraction Passing 2.36 mm IS Sieve (Wc) (gm)
4 Aggregate Impact Value = Wc/Wa x 100 %
5 Average Aggregate Impact Value (%)

. …...% MAX
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
GE(P) AF Chakeri CWE Chakeri CE Nagpur E-IN-C
LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST

(As per IS: 2386 Part IV)
Type /Grade of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Location/Source: …………….. Weight of charges…………….
No .of charges……………. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
No. of Revolutions -……… 500 /1000 Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION TABLE
Weight of Sample, W1 gm
Wt. of fraction retained 1.70mm IS Sieve (W2) gm
Weight of fraction passing 1.70 mm I.S. Sieve,

W3= W1-W2
Los Angeles Abrasion Value, W3/W1 x 100 %
Average Los Angeles Abrasion Value %
LIMITS:
Specified WMM DLC M-25 PQC DBM DAC

Limit
% 35 35 35 35 30
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………
DETERMINATION OF TEN PERCENT FINES VALUE

(As per BS 812 Part III)


Estimated Force required to produce 10% fines =
OBSERVATION TABLE
Sample No. Force Applied in KN Total wt. of dry Material passing % Fines
(X) Sample 2.36 mm sieve
Average % fines (Y)
Force equivalent to produce 10% fines = 14x =

Y+4
10 % fines value = …………KN
Permissible Limit = ………..KN
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


OBSERVATION TABLE
S. No. Particulars Sample No.1 Sample No. 2
1 12.50mm Passing 10.00mm Retained dry wt. of sample

(W1) gm
2 Wt. Of Aggregate retained 2.36 mm IS Sieve

(W2) gm
3 Wt. of Aggregate Passing 2.36 mm IS Sieve after test

(W3) = (W1-W2) gm
4 Crushing Value = (W3/W1)x100 ( %)
5 Average Crushing Value (%)
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT -………….% Maximum
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………………
SPECIFIC GRAVITY&WATER ABSORPTION OF FINE AGGREGATES

(As per IS 2386 Part-III)


OBSERVATION TABLE
1 Wt. of saturated surface dry fine gm

Aggregate in air (A)
2 Wt. of Pycnometer filled with water + gm

material (B)
3 Wt. of Pycnometer filled with water gm

only (C)
4 Wt. of oven dried Fine Aggregate in gm

air (D)
5 Specific Gravity = D/[A-(B-C)]
6 Apparent Specific Gravity =

D/[D-(B-C)]
6 Water Absorption = (A-D/D)x100 %
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………..
SPECIFIC GRAVITY&WATER ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATES

GUJARAT
Name of the Contractor : KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD
Type of Sample: …………….… Test No………..
OBSERVATION TABLE
1 Sample in water(W1) gm
2 Wt. of saturated surface dry sample(W2) gm
3 Wt. of oven dried sample(W3) gm
4 Specific Gravity on SSD Bias

W2 / W2- W1
5 Specific Gravity on Oven Dry Bias
W3 / W2- W1
6 Apparent specific gravity
W3 / W3- W1
7 Water Absorption %
(W2- W3 / W3 )*100
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
COMPACTION FACTOR TEST OF PQC

(As per IS: 1199)

Type of Sample: ……………. Test No….……

Location/Source …………….. Date of Sampling: ...………......
OBSERVATION TABLE
S. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2 Trial -3 Trial-4 Trial -5
No.
1 Wt. of Empty mould g
2 Wt. of mould + concrete before g

compaction
3 Wt. of partially compacted g

concrete W1 = (2) - (1)
4 Weight of mould + concrete after g

compaction
5 Weight of fully compacted g

concrete W2 = (4)-(1)
6 Compaction Factor = W1/W2
7 Average
8 Permissible limit
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
GE (P) Chakeri
SLUMP TEST OF CONCRETE

(As per IS: 1199)

Type of Sample…………… Test No….……

Location/Source…………. Date of Sampling……………
Date of Testing……………
OBSERVATION TABLE
S. No. Date of Location Type of sample Slump Permissible Limit

Testing (mm) (mm)
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
GE (P) Chakeri
CORE CUTTING DENSITY DETERMINATION FOR DAC - I


Location/Layer No.: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
Lab Density :……………g/cc Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Chainag Height Wt. of Wt. of Wt. of Volume Density Compaction
No. e of core sample Sample in S.S.D (cc) (g/cc) %
(mm) in Air Water Sample(gm)
(gm) (gm)
1
2
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DETERMINATION OF DENSITY (CONCRETE CORE )


Location/Layer .: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. No. Chainage Height Dia of Volume Wt. of Core Density
of core core(cm) (cc) Sample(gm) (g/cc)
(cm)
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
ATTERBERG LIMITS
(As per IS: 2720 Part-V)


Date of Testing: ………..…….
OBSERVATION TABLE
LIQUID LIMIT
Particulars Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4
Number of Blows/Penetration
Container No.
Wt. of Container= W1, g
Wt. of Wet soil +container =W2,g
Wt. of oven dry soil +container = W3,gm
Wt. of Water Ww= W2-W3, g
Wt. of dry soil Ws=W3-W1, g
Water Content(%) = Ww/Ws X 100
Average Liquid Limit(%)
PLASTIC LIMIT
Container No.

Water Content % = Ww/Ws X 100
Average Plastic Limit(%)
RESULT: Liquid Limit =…..…….%, Plastic Limit =…….……%, Plasticity Index =…….………%
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………………
MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY TEST

(As per IS: 2720 Part-VIII)
Type of Sample: ……………... Test No….……

3
Volume of mould (V): …….....…cm Date of Testing: ...……..…….
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6
Water Added (%)
Wt. of Mould = M1
Wt. of Mould + Compacted Material(M2gm)
Wt. of Compacted sample (M= M2- M1gm)
Volume of sample = V
Bulk Density of material γ= M/V gm/cc
Container No.
Wt. of Container= W1gm
Wt. of Wet material + container = W2 gm
Wt. of Oven Dry material + cont. = W3 gm
Wt. of water W4= W2-W3 gm
Wt. of Dry material W5= W3-W1gm
Water Content, wc % = W4/W5 *100

Dry density γd = γ X 100/(wc+100)gm/ cc
Dia of Weight of Height of Fall No. of blows No.of layers OMC(%) MDD(g/cc)
Mould(cm.) Rammer (kg.) (cm.)
15 / 10 4.89 45 55 / 25 5
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOIL



OBSERVATION TABLE
Sieve Size Weight Retained Cumulative Weight Cumulative Weight Passing
Retained Retained
mm (g) (%)
(g) (%)
75
19
4.75
2.00
0.425
0.075
Gravel = ……………..%, Sand = …………….%, Silt & Clay = …………….%
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

C.B.R TEST
(As per IS: 2720 Part XVI)

Location/Source: …………….. Volume of Mould (V): ……………
Correction factor……… Soaking Period: ..………… Date of Casting: ...……….....
M.D.D: ……………. O.M.C: …………. Date of Testing: ………..……
Mould No. Mould No. Mould No.

Description Before After Before After Before After
soaking soaking soaking soaking soaking soaking
Wt. of Mould + Wet Soil = W1 gm
Wt. of Mould = W2 gm
Wet of Wet Soil, W3 = W1 – W2
Bulk Density of Soil(γ) = W3/V gm/cc
Container No.
Weight of Container = w1 gm
Wt. of wet soil + Container = w2 gm
Wt. of Oven dry soil + Container = w3 gm
Wt. of Water w1 = w2 –w3 gm
Wt. of Dry soil w = w3 –w1 gm
Water Content % = w1/w x 100

Dry Density = γX 100 / (mc +100)gm/cc
Load Test: CBR = Pt / Ps X 100(Ps=1370kg at 2.5mm , Ps = 2055 kg at 5mm)
Mould No. Mould No.
(mm)Penetration
Mould No.
sReading
kgLoad
CBR%
sReading
kgLoad
sReading
kgLoad
CBR%
CBR%
CBR%
Avg.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
Remark…......................................................................................CBR Value (%) = …………..
FREE SWELL INDEX OF SOIL

(As per IS: 2720 Part XXXX)


OBSERVATION SHEET
Sample No.
S. No. Description
1 2
1 Volume of Specimen in Kerosene Oil in Graduated

Cylinder after 24 hours = Vk
2 Volume of Specimen in Distilled Water in

Graduated Cylinder after 24 hours Vw
3 Difference in volume (Vw-Vk)

4 Free Swell Index = (Vw –Vk)/VkX100(%)
5 Average Free Swell Index %
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
CEMENT
(As per IS: 4031 Part I)


Brand /Make of Cement: …………… Date of Testing: ………..……
Week No. of Cement :……………
OBSERVATION TABLE
Description Trial 1 Trial 2 Average Permissible

Limit
Weight of cement, W1 (g)
Weight of cement retained on 90

micron IS sieve, W2 (g)
Fineness = W2/W1 x 100 %

Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

CEMENT TEST
Name of work : RESURFACING OF RUNWAY AND ALLIED WORKS SERVICES AT AF STATION , JAMNAGAR
Contract Agreement No : CE(AF)G/JAM/39 OF 2018-2019
Name of the Contractor : KCC BUILDCON Pvt Limited

Location/Source: ……………. Date of Sampling: ...……….....
Brand/Type of Cement: …………… Date of Testing: ………..……
Week No. of cement :………….
OBSERVATION TABLE
S. Parameter Unit Results Permissible limits

No.
1 Fineness of cement % 10% Maximun

Consistency of cement 27%-35%
2 %
3 Initial setting of cement min 30 minutes minimum

4 Final setting of cement min 600 minutes maximum
5 Compressive Strength
3 days Strength N/mm2 23 N/mm2
Date (MPa)

Date (MPa)

Date (MPa)
6 Soundness of cement mm 10mm maximum
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………….

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CEMENT
(As per IS: 4031 Part I)

Brand of Cement: …………… Date of Casting………………
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. No. Date of Age of Load (KN) Compressive Average Min. Permissible

Testing Testing Strength Compressive Limit
(N/mm2) Strength (N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CEMENT
(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …….…… Test No: ….……

Location/Source: …………….. Date of Casting…………..
Age of Testing…………… Date of Testing…………..
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume Density Area of Load
No. Specimen of (g/cc) specimen (KN) Compressive Avg. Permissi
(g) specimen (mm2) strength strength ble
(cc) Limit
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE

(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …….…… Test No: ….……

Location/Source: …………….. Date of Casting…………..
Age of Testing…………… Date of Testing…………..
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume Density Area of Load
No. Specimen of (g/cc) specimen (KN) Compressive Avg. Permissi
(g) specimen (mm2) strength strength ble
(cc) Limit
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
(N/mm2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
INDIVIDUAL AGGREGATE GRADING FOR PQC


(gm) (%)
1 37 100
90-100
2 31
3 26.5 85-95
4 19.0 68-88
5 9.5 45-65
6 4.75 30-55
7 600 micron 8-30
8 150 micron 0-10
9 75micron 0-2
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………………..

GE (P) Chakeri
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR WMM

(As per MES Schedule P-I Cl. 20.B.2.5.4)


(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 100
2. 45.00 95-100
3. 22.4 60-80
4. 11.2 40-60
5. 4.75 25-40
6. 2.36 15-30
7. 600 6-18
micron
8. 75 4-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DLC

(As per MORT & H Table 600-1)


(gm) (%)
1 26.5
100
2 19.0 75-95
3 9.5 50-70
4 4.75 30-55
5 2.36 17-42
6 600 micron 8-22
7 300 micron 7-17
8 150 micron 2-12
9 0-10
75 micron
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………

GE (P) A/F Chakeri CWE (Chakeri) CE (Nagpur) E-IN-C
SOUNDNESS TEST FOR 20mm

(IS 2386 P-V)
Type of Sample: …………….… Test No….…………..

OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl no. SODIUM MAGNESIUM

TEST NO. SULPHATE SULPHATE
1
Total Sample weight (W1) g
2
Weight of sample Passing Seive 20.00 mm & Retained
on 12.5 mm 67% of Sample weight (g)
3 Weight of Sample Passing Sieve 12.5 mm & Retained

on 10.00mm 33% of Sample weight (g)
4 After 5 Cycle test finished the Sample Passing sieve on

8.00mm (W2) g
5 Soundness Value = W2/W1x100 %
6 Permissible Limit % 12%MAX. 18%MAX.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………
GE(P)AF CHAKERI CWE AF CHAKERI Lt Col Zaheer Abbas

SO1 (Runway)
E in C's Br
(IS 2386 P-V)

OBSERVATION SHEET
SODIUM MAGNESIUM
Sl no.
1
Total Sample weight (W1) (g)
2
Weight of sample Passing Seive 40.00 mm & Retained
on 25 mm 67% of Sample weight (g)
3 Weight of Sample Passing Sieve 25 mm & Retained on

20.00mm 33% of Sample weight (g)
4 After 5 Cycle test finished the Sample Passing sieve on

16.00mm (W2) g
Permissible Limit %
6 12% MAX. 18% MAX.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………

SO1 (Runway)
E in C's Br
SOUNDNESS TEST FOR 26.5mm
(IS 2386 P-V)


OBSERVATION SHEET
1
2
Weight of sample Passing Seive 40.00 mm &
Retained on 25 mm 67% of Sample weight (g)
3 Weight of Sample Passing Sieve 25 mm & Retained

on 20.00mm 33% of Sample weight (g)
4 After 5 Cycle test finished the Sample Passing sieve

on 16.00mm (W2) g
Permissible Limit %
6 12% MAX. 18% MAX.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………

SO1 (Runway)
E in C's Br
(IS 2386 P-V)


OBSERVATION SHEET

1
2
Weight of sample Passing Seive 10 mm & Retained
on 4.75 mm 100% of Total Sample weight (g)
4 After 5 Cycle test finished the Sample Passing sieve

on 4.00mm (W2) gm
5 Soundness Value W2/W1x100 %
6 Permissible Limit % 12% MAX. 18% MAX.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………

SO1 (Runway)
E in C's Br
SOUNDNESS TEST FOR SAND

(IS 2386 P-V)

Tested By: …………………. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl SODIAM MAGNICIAM After 5 Cycle test finished the
no TEST NO. SULPHATE SULPHATE sample sieved as per I.S.
. sieves
Na2SO4 MgSO4
1 Weight of sample Passing Seive 10.00
mm & Retained on 4.75 mm (100gm )
2 Weight of Sample Passing Sieve 4.75

mm & Retained on 2.36mm (100g)
mm & Retained on 1.18mm (100g)
mm & Retained on 600 mic. (100g)
5 Weight of Sample Passing Sieve
600mic, & Retained on 300mic. (100g)
Total Weight (g)
6
8
Soundness of Aggregate in Sodium
Sulphate
12% Max
9
Soundness of Aggregate in Magnesium 18 % Max
Sulphate
Remark ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

SO1 (Runway)
BULK DENSITY OF SAND

Name of work : RE-SURFACING OF RUNWAY AND ALLIED WORK SERVICES AT AF STATION JAMNAGAR
Name of the Contractor : M/S. KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD

Location/Source:……………….. Date of Sampling: ...………......
OBSERVATION
Height of calibrating Cylinder = cm.
Diameter of calibrating Cylinder = cm.
Volume of calibrating Cylinder V =π D 2 H / 4
DETERMINATION BULK DENSITY OF SAND
S.No. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2 Trial-3
1 Wt. of Cylinder and Sand Before g

Pouring (W1)
2 Wt. of Cylinder and Sand After Pouring g
(W2)
3 Wt. of Sand in cone (w3) g
4 Wt. of Sand Filling Calibrating Cylinder g

W4=(W1-W2-W3)
5 Volume of Calibrating Cylinder (V) Cm3
6 Bulk Density of Sand =W4/V g/cc
7 Average Bulk density of Sand g/cc
Remark ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI , KANPUR
Name of the Contractor: PNC Infratech Limited
Type of Sample: …………….… Test No….…… Location/Source:
…………….. Date of Sampling: ...………......
OBSERVATION
Height of calibrating Cylinder = cm.
Diameter of calibrating Cylinder = cm.
Volume of calibrating Cylinder V =π D ² H /4
Determination of Sand Weight in Cone

S. No. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2
1 Wt. of pouring Sand with Cylinder (w1) g
2 Wt. of Sand & Cylinder after Pouring of g

Sand on plane surface (w2)
3 Wt. of Sand in Cone W= (w1-w2) g
4 Average Wt. of Sand in Cone (w3) g

S. No. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2
1 Wt. of pouring Sand with cylinder (w1) g
2 Wt. of Cylinder and Sand after Filling g

calibrating Cylinder(w4)
3 Wt. of Sand Filling Calibrating Cylinder and g
cone w5=(w1-w4)
4 Wt. of Sand in cone (w3) g
5 Wt. of Sand Filling Calibrating Cylinder g

W6=(w5-w3)
6 Volume of Calibrating Cylinder(V) Cm3
7 Bulk Density of Sand = W6/V g/cc
8 Average Bulk density of Sand g/cc
Remark ………………………………………………………………………………………………….
\
SOUNDNESS TEST for 6 mm

Location/Source: ……………..Date of Sampling: ...………...... Tested
By: …………………. Date of Testing: ………..……
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl no. SODIAM MAGNICIAM

TEST NO. SULPHATE SULPHATE REMARKS
1

2
Weight of sample Passing Seive 10.00 mm
& Retained on 4.75 mm 100% of Sample
weight (g)
4 After 5 Cycle test finished the Sample

Passing sieve on 4.00mm (W2) gm
6.
Soundness of Aggregate in Sodium 12% Max
Sulphate
7
Soundness of Aggregate in Magnesium 18 % Max
Sulphate
Remark ………………………………………………………………………………………………….
GRADATION FOR SOLING

Ref.: GSB - I (MORTH Table 400-1)

Type of Sample: ….Demolition PQC below material Test No…

Location/Source: … Date of Sampling: ...02-10-2016
Weight of Sample…38720 g. Date of Testing: …02-10-2016
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

Size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing Limits
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%) Grade-I Grade-II
75.0 00 00 00 100 100 - -
53.0 225 225 0.58 99.42 80-100 100 -
26.5 17780 18005 46.5 53.5 55-90 70-100
9.50 7205 25210 65.11 34.89 35-65 50-80
4.75 3145 28355 73.23 26.77 25-55 40-65
2.36 1785 30140 77.84 22.16 20-40 30-50
0.425 2705 32845 84.83 15.17 10-15 10-15
0.075 4615 37460 96.75 3.25 0-5 0-5
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) Engineer-In-Charge
GRADATION FOR SOLING

Type of Sample: …. Demolition PQC crushed material Test No…

Location/Source: … Date of Sampling: ...19-09-2016
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sieve Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Percentage Percentage

Size (gm) Retained (gm) Retained Passing
(mm) (%) (%)
75.0 00 00 00 100
63 1950 1950 5.61 94.39
53 5550 7500 21.58 78.42
50 2850 10350 29.78 70.22
45 5900 16250 46.76 53.24
40 8650 24900 71.65 28.35
37.5 700 25600 73.66 26.34
31.5 7700 33300 95.82 4.18
26.5 950 34250 98.56 1.43
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
GRADATION FOR GSB

(As per IS: 2386 Part I/MORTH Table 400-1)

Type of Sample: …. Test No…

Location/Source: … Date of Sampling: ...
Weight of Sample… g. Date of Testing: …
OBSERVATION SHEET

(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%) Grade-I Grade-II Grade-III
75.0 100 - -
53.0 80-100 100 100

26.5 55-90 70-100 55-75
9.50 35-65 50-80 -
4.75 25-55 40-65 10-30
2.36 20-40 30-50 -
0.425 10-15 10-15 -
0.075 <5 <5 <5
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
DESIGN MIX OF
WET MIX MACADAM
Name of work: Resurfacing of Runway and Allied Works at
AFS Panagarh
Contract Agreement No.: CE(AF)SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14

INDIVIDUAL AGGREGATE GRADING FOR WMM
(As per CA NO.CE(AF)SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14
Name of work: Resurfacing of Runway and Allied Works at AFS Panagarh
Type of Sample: ……40mm Agg.Test No….……01

Location/Source: …PAKURDate of Sampling: ..10-04-2014 Weight of Sample… 12000 gDate of Testing: ….10-
04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 9096 9096 75.8 24.2 60-80
4. 11.2 2890 11986 99.88 .12 40-60
5. 4.75 25-40
6. 2.36 15-30
7. 600 8-22
micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: …………………………………………………………..
Lab EngineerContractor’sRep.J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

Type of Sample: ……40mm Agg. Test No….……02Location/Source:

…PAKUR Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014 Weight of Sample… 13148 g
Date of Testing: ….10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 9664 9664 73.48 26.51 60-80
4. 11.2 3464 13128 99.85 .15 40-60
5. 4.75 25-40
6. 2.36 15-30
7. 600 8-22
micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab EngineerContractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil)A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

Type of Sample: ……20mm Agg. Test No……..01 Location/Source: …PAKUR

Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014 Weight of Sample…11514 g Date
of Testing: …10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 48 48 .42 99.58 60-80
4. 11.2 10814 10862 94.34 5.66 40-60
5. 4.75 626 11488 99.77 .23 25-40
6. 2.36 15-30
7. 600 8-22
micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab EngineerContractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

Type of Sample: ……20mm Agg.Test No….…… 02Location/Source: …PAKUR

of Testing: …10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 48 48 .50 99.50 60-80
4. 11.2 8910 8958 92.79 7.21 40-60
5. 4.75 642 9600 99.44 .56 25-40
6. 2.36 15-30
7. 600 8-22
micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: ….10mm Agg.Test No….…… 01 Location/Source: …PAKUR

of Testing: …10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100

3. 22.4 00 00 00 100 60-80
4. 11.2 34 34 .68 99.32 40-60
5. 4.75 4716 4750 9462 5.38 25-40
6. 2.36 214 4964 98.88 1.12 15-30
7. 600 12 4976 99.12 .88 8-22

micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: ….10mm Agg.Test No….…… 02 Location/Source: …PAKUR

of Testing: …..10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 00 00 00 100 60-80
4. 11.2 40 40 .80 99.20 40-60

5. 4.75 4670 4710 94.39 5.61 25-40
6. 2.36 180 4890 98.00 2.00 15-30
7. 600 14 4904 98.28 1.72 8-22

micron
8. 75 0-8
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: ….STONE DUSTTest No….……01Location/Source: …PAKUR

Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014 Weight of Sample…3326g Date
of Testing: … 10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 00 00 00 100 60-80
4. 11.2 00 00 00 100 40-60
5. 4.75 328 328 9.86 90.13 25-40
6. 2.36 914 1242 37.34 62.66 15-30
7. 600 1144 2386 71.74 28.26 8-22

micron
8. 75 708 3094 93.02 6.98 0-8

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: ….STONE DUSTTest No….…… 02 Location/Source: …PAKUR

of Testing: … 10-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2. 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 22.4 00 00 00 100 60-80
4. 11.2 00 00 00 100 40-60
5. 4.75 270 270 8.44 91.56 25-40
6. 2.36 874 1144 35.75 64.25 15-30
7. 600 1150 2294 71.69 28.31 8-22

micron
8. 75 652 2946 92.06 7.94 0-8

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
AVG. OF PASSING PERCENTAGE

Contract Agreement No. : CE(AF)SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14
Type of Sample: ….WMMTest No….…… 01Location/Source: …PAKUR Date of

Sampling: ..10-04-2014
. Date of Testing: … .. 10-04-2014
Sl. Sieve size % passing % passing % passing % passing

No. (mm) ( 40 mm) ( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust )
1 53.00 100 100 100 100
2 45.00 100 100 100 100
3 22.4 25.36 99.54 100 100
4 11.2 0.14 6.44 99.26 100
5 4.75 0.4 5.5 90.84
6 2.36 1.56 63.46
7 600 1.3 28.29

micron
8 75 7.46
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
(Lab Engineer)(Contractor’s Rep.)(J.E.(Civil) (A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge)
JOB MIX FORMULA FOR WMM

Type of Sample: …....WMM TRIAL NO.…… 01 Location/Source: …PAKUR

Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014
Date of Testing: … 10-04-2014
Sieve
size ( 40 mm) ( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust ) ALL LIMIT AS
(mm) IN % PER CA
PASSI
NG
Passing 25% Passing 25% Passing 20% Passing 30%
% % % %
53.00 100 25 100 25 100 20 100 30 100 100
45.00 100 25 100 25 100 20 100 30 100 95-100
22.4 25.36 6.34 99.54 24.89 100 20 100 30 81.23 60-80
11.2 0.14 0.04 6.44 1.61 99.26 19.85 100 30 51.5 40-60
4.75 0.4 0.1 5.5 1.1 90.84 27.25 28.45 25-40
2.36 1.56 0.31 63.46 19.04 19.35 15-30
600 1.3 0.26 28.29 8.49 8.75 8-22

micron
75 7.46 2.24 2.24 0-8

micron
Remarks: …Fail in grading

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep.J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge
JOB MIX FORMULA FOR WMM

(As per CA NO.CE (AF) SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14
Type of Sample: ….WMMTRIAL. NO- 02 Location/Source: …PAKUR

Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014
( 40 mm) ( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust ) ALL IN % LIMIT

Sieve PASSING PER CA
size AS
Passing 30% Passing 20% Passing 20% Passing 30%
( mm) % % % %
53.00 100 30 100 20 100 20 100 30 100 100
45.00 100 30 100 20 100 20 100 30 100 95-100
22.4 25.36 7.61 99.54 19.85 100 20 100 30 77.52 60-80
11.2 0.14 0.04 6.44 1.29 99.26 19.85 100 30 51.18 40-60
2
4.75 0.4 0.08 5.5 1.1 90.84 27.25 28.43 25-40
2.36 1.56 0.31 63.46 19.04 19.35 15-30
600 1.3 0.26 28.29 8.49 8.75 8-22

micron
75 7.46 2.24 2.24 0-8

micron
Remarks: ……Pass in grading
Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

COMBINED GRADING FOR WMM
Type of Sample: ….WMM. TRIAL ….…… 01 Location/Source: …PAKUR

Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014.
40 mm 25% 2500 g.
20 mm 25%2500 g.
10 mm 20% 2000 g.
Stone dust 30% 3000 g.
Total sample wt. .10000g.
Sl. Sieve size % passing % passing % passing % passing Limit as per

No. (mm) ( 40 mm) ( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust ) CA
1 53.00 00 00 00 100 100
2 45.00 00 00 00 100 95-100
3 22.4 1680 1680 16.8 83.2 60-80
4 11.2 3476 5156 51.56 48.44 40-60
5 4.75 1986 7142 71.42 28.58 25-40
6 2.36 868 8010 80.1 19.9 15-30
7 600 1035 9045 90.45 9.55 8-22

micron
8 75 654 9699 96.99 3.01 0-8

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
COMBINED GRADING FOR WMM

Name of work : Resurfacing of Runway and Allied Works at AFS Panagarh
Type of Sample: ….WMM. TRIAL….…… 02
Location/Source: …PAKUR Date of Sampling: ..10-04-2014
. Date of Testing: … 10-04-2014
40 mm 30% 3000g.
20 mm 20% 2000 g.
10 mm 20% 2000 g.
Stone dust 30% 3000 g.
Total sample wt. .10000g.
Sl. Sieve size % passing % passing % passing % passing Limit as per

No. (mm) ( 40 mm) ( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust ) CA
1 53.00 0 0 00 100 100
2 45.00 0 0 00 100 95-100
3 22.4 2805 2805 28.05 71.95 60-80
4 11.2 2202 5007 50.07 49.93 40-60
5 4.75 2132 7139 71.39 28.61 25-40
6 2.36 899 8038 80.38 19.62 15-30
7 600 1044 9082 90.82 9.18 8-22

micron
8 75 633 9715 97.15 2.85 0-8

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E. (Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATIONINDEX
(As per IS: 2386 Part-I)
Type of Sample….WMM MIXED MATERIAL Test No……………….

Location/Source: …LAB SITE Date of Sampling:…03-05-2014
Tested by…..Jointly Date of Testing: …..03-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
SIZE OF SIEVE WIEGHT OF WIEGHT OF WIEGHT OF WIEGHT OF
SL. FRACTION AGG. IN AGG. IN EACH AGG.IN
NO. PASSING RETAINED CONSISTING EACH FRACTION EACH
THROUGH ON SIEVE OF ATLEAST FRACTION RETAINED ON FRACTION
SIEVE (MM) (MM) 200 retained PASSING THICKNESS RETAINED
Pieces THICKNESS GAUGE ON LENGTH
(gm) GAUGE (gm) GAUGE
(gm) (gm)
A B C D E F
1 63 50 - - - -
2 50 40 - - - -
3 40 31.5 2062 480 1582 00
4 31.5 25 3986 292 3694 -
5 25 20 4242 360 3882 616
6 20 16 2750 266 2484 404
7 16 12.5 1444 182 1262 178

8 12.5 10 1074 190 884 208
9 10 6.3 726 136 590 142
TOTAL 16284 1906 14378 1548
(A) FLAKINESS INDEX (F.I)=Totalwt.of flaky material x 100=…11.7…….%

Total wt. Sample
(B) ELONGATION INDEX (E.I) = Total wt.of Elongation material x 100 = ….10.76..…….. %
Total wt.ofnon flaky material
(C) COMBINED FLAKINESS & ELONGATION INDEX = (A) + (B)= …22.46………%
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT = ………15%…(Flakiness)…& 30% (Combined)
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………

LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST
Type /Grade of Sample: …WMM MIXED MATERIAL/ GTest No…01

Location/Source: ..LAB SITE Weight of charges…
No.of charges…..12 Date of Sampling: ...03-05-2014
No.of Revolutions -………….500 / 1000 Date of Testing: …03-05-2014
Weight of Sample, W1 gm 10000 10000
Wt. of fraction retained 1.70mm IS Sieve (W2) gm 8580 8494
Weight of fraction passing 1.70 mm I.S. Sieve, W3= W1-W2 1470 1506
Los Angeles Abrasion Value = W3/W1 x 100 % 14.70 15.06
14.88
Average of Los Angeles Abrasion Value %
LIMITS -
Specified WMM DLC M-25 PQC DBM DAC
limits
(%) 35 35 35 35 30
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………

Type of Sample: ……..WMMTest No….……01
Location/Source: …….LAB Date of Sampling: ..15-04-2014
Volume of mould (V): .2250cc.Date of Testing: .....15-04-2014
Water Added (%) =Wc 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
Wt. of Empty Mould =M1(gm) 6106 6106 6106 6106 6106 6106
Wt. of Mould + Compacted Material=M2(gm) 11478 11664 11844 12098 12002 11982
Wt. of Compacted sample M= M2- M1 (gm) 5372 5558 5738 5902 5896 5876
Volume of sample = V (cc) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
Bulk Density of material γ = M/V ( gm/cc) 2.388 2.470 2.550 2.623 2.620 2.612
Container No. 19 03 20 06 21 04
Wt. of Container= W1(gm) 150.7 160.7 158.1 137.4 159.1 128.7
Wt. of Wet material + container = W2( gm) 408.7 391.7 394.4 365.6 415.6 331.6
Wt. of Oven Dry material + cont. = W3 ( gm) 398.4 381.0 381.5 351.8 399.9 317.1
Wt. of Dry material W4= W3-W1 (gm) 247.7 220.3 223.4 214.4 240.8 188.4
Wt. of water W5= W2-W3 (gm) 10.3 10.7 12.9 13.8 15.7 14.5
Water Content, W % = W5/W4 *100 4.16 4.86 5.57 6.44 6.52 7.70
Dry density yd = γ X 100/(wc+100)gm/ cc 2.293 2.356 2.415 2.464 2.460 2.425
15 4.89 450 55 5 6.5 2.455
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……
AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE TEST


Type of Sample: …WMM MIXED MATERIALTest No…01

Location/Source: … LABDate of Sampling: ...03-05-2014
Tested by ……Jointly Date of Testing: ….03-05-2014
S. No. Particulars Sample No.1 Sample No. 2
2996 2996
1 12.50mm Passing 10.00mm Retained dry wt. of sample
(W1) gm
2504 2520
2 Wt. Of Aggregate retained 2.36 mm IS Sieve (W2) gm
492 476
3 Wt. of Aggregate Passing 2.36MM IS Sieve after test
(W3) gm = (W1-W2)
16.42 15.89
4 Crushing Value % =(W3/W1)x100
16.16
5 Average Crushing Value (%)
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT - 35% Maximum
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE


Type of Sample: …WMM MIXED MATERIAL Test No….01

Location/Source: …LABDate of Sampling: ...03-05-2014 Tested by …Jointly Date of Testing: …03-
05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. No.
Test No. 1 2 Permissible
Limit
(%)
1 Mass of Aggregate(Oven Dry) Passing 12.5 mm IS 356 356
Sieve and Retained on 10 mm IS Sieve (Wa) (gm)
2 Mass of Fraction Retained on 2.36 mm IS Sieve 325 323

(Wb) (gm)
3 Mass of Fraction Passing 2.36 mm IS Sieve (Wc)(gm) 31 33
4 Aggregate Impact Value = Wc/Wa x 100 8.71 9.27
5 Average Aggregate Impact Value (%) 8.99

18%
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
Lab Engineer (Contractor’s Rep.)J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

WATER ABSORPTION OF COARSE& FINE AGGREGATE
Type of Sample: …WMMTest No….01

Location/Source: …PAKUR Date of Sampling: ...04-05-2014
Tested by…JointlyDate of Testing: …04-05-2014
40.00 MM AGGREGATE
2406 2383 0.97 0.9

1 4 Max. 2%
2 2542 2519 0.91
20.00MM AGGREGATE
2102 2083 0.91 0.9

1 1 Max. 2%
2 2210 2190 0.91
10.00MM AGGREGATE
1820 1803 0.94 0.9

1 6 Max. 2%
2 1654 1638 0.98
STONE DUST
609 600 1.50 1.5

1 2 Max. 2%
2 598 589 1.53
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Lab Engineer (Contractor’s Rep.) J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge
ATTERBERG LIMITS


Tested by…………. Date of Testing: ………..…….
OBSERVATION SHEET
LIQUID LIMIT
Number of Blows
Container No.
PLASTIC LIMIT
Container No.

RESULT: Liquid Limit=……….%, Plastic Limit=…………%, Plasticity Index=……………%
(Lab Incharge) (Contractor’s Rep.) J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

DESIGN MIX OF
DRYLEAN CEMENT
CONCRETE
Name of work : Resurfacing of Runway and Allied

Works at AFS Panagarh
Name of the Contractor : PNC InfratechLimited
INDIVIDUAL AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DLC

Type of Sample: ……20mm Agg. Test No….……01

Location/Source: ……PAKUR Date of Sampling: …11-04-2014
Weight of Sample……10000 gm. Date of Testing: …...11-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 1392 1392 13.92 86.08 80-100
3. 9.5 8342 9734 97.34 2.66 55-75
4. 4.75 256 9990 99.90 0.10 35-60
5. 600 10-35
micron
6. 75 0-5
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
(Lab Engineer) (Contractor’s Rep.) J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge


(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 1872 1872 18.71 81.29 80-100
3. 9.5 7922 9794 97.92 2.08 55-75
4. 4.75 194 9988 99.86 0.14 35-60
5. 600 10-35
micron
6. 75 0-5
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 00 00 00 100 80-100
3. 9.5 250 250 3.57 96.43 55-75

4. 4.75 6470 6720 96.00 4.00 35-60
5. 600 244 6964 99.49 0.51 10-35

micron
6. 75 0-5
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 00 00 00 100 80-100
3. 9.5 200 200 2.5 97.5 55-75
4. 4.75 7404 7604 95.05 4.95 35-60
5. 600 330 7934 99.18 0.82 10-35

micron
6. 75 0-5
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: …….SANDTest No….……01

Location/Source: ……AJAY RIVER Date of Sampling: …11-04-2014
Weight of Sample……1000gm.Date of Testing: …...11-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 00 00 00 100 80-100
3. 9.5 00 00 00 100 55-75
4. 4.75 18 18 1.8 98.2 35-60
5. 600 462 480 48.0 52.0 10-35

micron
6. 75 510 990 99.0 1.00 0-5

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: …….SAND Test No….……02

Location/Source: ……AJAY RIVER Date of Sampling: …11-04-2014
(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 00 00 00 100 80-100
3. 9.5 00 00 00 100 55-75
4. 4.75 14 14 1.4 98.6 35-60
5. 600 460 474 47.4 52.6 10-35

micron
6. 75 514 988 98.8 1.2 0-5

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
AVERAGE OF PERCENTAGE PASSING

Type of Sample: ……DLCTest No….……01

Location/Source: …..PAKUR Date of Sampling: ...11-04-2014
Date of Testing: …..11-04-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size (mm) Passing % Passing % Passing %

No. 20mm 10mm Sand
1. 26.5 100 100 100
2. 19 83.28 100 100
3. 9.5 2.37 96.97 100
4. 4.75 0.12 4.48 98.4
5. 600 0.67 52.3

micron
6. 75 1.1
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

JOB MIX FORMULA FOR DLC
Type of Sample: ……..DLC Test No….……01

Date of Testing: …...11-04-2014
( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( Sand) ALL IN % LIMIT

size
Passing 33% Passing %27% Passing 40% PASSING PER CA
% %
( mm) AS
26.50 100 33 100 27 100 40 100 100
19.00 83.28 27.48 100 27 100 40 94.48 80-100
9.50 2.37 0.78 96.97 26.18 100 40 66.96 55-75
4.75 0.12 0.04 4.48 1.21 98.40 36.36 37.61 35-60
600 0.67 0.18 52.30 20.92 21.10 10-35

Mic.
75 1.10 0.44 0.44 00-10

Mic.
…
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………….
(Lab Engineer) Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge

JOB MIX FORMULA FOR DLC

( 20 mm) ( 10 mm) ( Sand) ALL IN % LIMIT

size
Passing 30% Passing %30% Passing 40% PASSING PER CA
% %
( mm) AS
26.50 100 33 100 30 100 40 100 100
19.00 83.28 24.98 100 30 100 40 94.48 80-100
9.50 2.37 0.71 96.97 29.09 100 40 66.96 55-75
4.75 0.12 0.036 4.48 1.34 98.40 36.36 37.61 35-60
600 0.67 0.20 52.30 20.92 21.10 10-35

Mic.
75 1.10 0.44 0.44 00-10

Mic.
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………..

Contract Agreement No: CE(AF)SZ/PAN/18 OF 2013-14

20mm Agg. 33% 3300g.

10mm Agg. 27% 2700g.
Sand 40% 4000g.
Total weight 100% 10000g.
(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 500 500 5.00 95.00 80-100
3. 9.5 1790 2290 22.90 77.10 55-75
4. 4.75 3646 5936 59.36 40.64 35-60
5. 600 1938 7874 78.74 21.26 10-35

micron
6. 75 2104 9978 99.78 0.22 0-5

micron
Remarks: ………Grading is fail.
(Lab Engineer) (Contractor’s Rep.)J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge


20mm Agg. 30% 3000g.

10mm Agg. 30% 3000g.
Sand 40% 4000g.
Total weight 100% 10000g.
(gm) (%)
1. 26.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 19 662 662 6.62 93.38 80-100
3. 9.5 2552 3214 32.14 67.86 55-75
4. 4.75 2748 5962 59.62 40.38 35-60
5. 600 1676 7638 76.38 23.62 10-35

micron
6. 75 2310 9948 99.48 0.52 0-5

micron
Remarks: …………Grading is pass………………………………………………………………………
PNC Infratech Limited

Name of work : Resurfacing of Runway and Allied Works at AFS Panagarh
USE OF MATERIAL:
Coarse Source Specific Gravity Water

Agg.&Fine Absorption
Agg.
40mm Pakur 2.884 0.94
20mm Pakur 2.88 0.91
10mm Pakur 2.86 0.93
Sand Ajay River 2.575 1.30
Cement ACC (PPC)
Water Plant Site
QUANTITY OF MATERIAL:
COARSE AGG.:
V =[W + C/SG +(1/1-P)*Ca/SG]*1/1000
0.98=[150 + 250/3.15 + 1/0.6 * Ca/2.87]*1/1000
= 1292.593 Kg = 1292.6 Kg
AGGREGATE RATIO: = 20mm : 10mm = 50 : 50
20mm Agg.= 646.3 Kg
10mm Agg.= 646.3 Kg
FINE AGG.:
V = [W + C/SG +(1/1-P)*Ca/SG]*1/1000
0.98= [150 + 250/3.15 + 1/0.4 * Fa/2.575]*1/1000
= 773.154 Kg
(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …DLCWITH ACC PPCCEMENTTest No: …01

Location/Source: ..LAB.Date of Casting…07-04-2014
Age of Testing…07 DaysDate of Testing....14-04-2014.
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume of Density Area of Load

No. Specimen specimen (gm/cc) specimen (mm2) (KN) Compressive Avg.
(gm) (cc) strength strength
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
1. 8565 3375 2.538 22500 367 16.31

2. 8331 3375 2.468 22500 353 15.69 16.89
3. 8455 3375 2.505 22500 420 18.67
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …DLC WITH BIRLA PPC CEMENTTest No: …01

Location/Source: ..LAB.Date of Casting…08-04-2014
Age of Testing…07 DaysDate of Testing....15-04-2014.
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume of Density Area of Load

No. Specimen specimen (gm/cc) specimen (mm2) (KN) Compressive Avg.
(gm) (cc) strength strength
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
1. 8406 3375 2.491 22500 315 14.00

2. 8386 3375 2.485 22500 316 14.04 13.75
3. 8430 3375 2.498 22500 297 13.20
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

DESIGN MIX OF
PAVEMENT QUALITY
CONCRETE


COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR PQC

(gm) (%)
1. 31.5 100
2. 26.5 85-95
3. 19 68-88
4. 9.5 45-65
5. 4.75 30-55
6. 600 micron 8-30
7. 150 micron 5-15
8. 75 0-5
micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …PQCWITH JP CEMENT OPC-43GRADETest No: …01
Location/Source: ..LAB TEST FOR DESIGN MIXDate of Casting..11-05-2014
Age of Testing…..07 DAYS Date of Testing..18-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume of Density Area of Load (KN)
No. Specimen specimen (gm/cc) specimen Compressive Avg.
(gm) (cc) (mm2) strength strength
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
1. 8806 3375 2.609 22500 972 43.20

2. 8725 3375 2.585 22500 967 42.98 44.25
3. 8761 3375 2.596 22500 1048 46.58
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

(As per IS: 516)
Grade/Type of Concrete: …PQC WITH ULTRATECH CEMENT OPC-43GRADE Test No: …01
Location/Source: ..LAB TEST FOR DESIGN MIX Date of Casting..11-05-2014
Age of Testing…..07 DAYS Date of Testing..18-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
S. Wt. of Volume of Density Area of Load (KN)

No. Specimen specimen (gm/cc) specimen Compressive Avg.
(gm) (cc) (mm2) strength strength
(N/mm2) (N/mm2)
1. 8856 3375 2.624 22500 564 25.07

2. 8575 3375 2.541 22500 895 39.78 37.89
3. 8534 3375 2.529 22500 810 36.00
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

DESIGN MIX OF
GRANULAR SUB-BASE

PNC INFRATECH LIMITED

QUALITY & SOURCE

Description Source Specific Gravity Water
Absorption
40mmAgg. Pakur 2.884 0.94
10mmAgg. Pakur 2.86 0.93
StoneDust Pakur 2.86 1.65
Water Plant Site
Modified Proctor OMC 6.0%
Modified Proctor MDD 2.412 g/cc
CBR VALUE @ 2.5 mm 50.79 %
CBR VALUE @ 5.0 mm 101.06 %
Plasticity Index NON-PLASTIC
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………
INDIVIDUALGRADATION FOR GSB

Type of Sample: ….40mm Test No…01

Location/Source: …LAB. SITE Date of Sampling: ...08-05-2014
Weight of Sample…10004g. Date of Testing: …08-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. %Wt.
No. (mm) (gm) Retained Retained Passing
(gm)
1. 75 00 00 100
00
2. 53 00 00 00 100
3. 26.5 5404 5404 54.02 45.98
4. 9.5 4600 10004 100 00
5. 4.75 - - - -
6. 2.36
7. 0.425
8. 0.075
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………
INDIVIDUAL GRADATION FOR GSB

Name of work: Resurfacing/ Strengthening of Runway at A/F Station Chakeri, Kanpur

Contract Agreement No.: CE(AF)/NGP/CHK/34 OF 2015-2016
Type of Sample: ………………. Test No………………

Location/Source: ……………… Date of Sampling: ....................
Weight of Sample……………… Date of Testing: ……………
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. %Wt.

No. size (gm) Retained Retained Passing
(mm) (gm)
1. 75
2. 53
3. 26.5
4. 9.5
5. 4.75
6. 2.36
7. 0.425
8. 0.075
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………


Type of Sample: ….10mm Test No…01

Weight of Sample…5950g. Date of Testing: ..…08-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. %Wt.
(gm)
1. 75 00 00 100
00
2. 53 00 00 00 100
3. 26.5 00 00 00 100
4. 9.5 1574 1574 26.45 73.55
5. 4.75 4324 5898 99.13 0.87
6. 2.36 8 5906 99.26 0.74
7. 0.425 3 5909 99.31 0.69
8. 0.075 - - - -
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………


Type of Sample: ….10mm Test No……02

OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. %Wt.

No. size (gm) Retained (gm) Retained Passing
(mm)
1. 75 00 00 100
00
2. 53 00 00 00 100
3. 26.5 00 00 00 100
4. 9.5 1750 1750 26.56 73.44
5. 4.75 4748 6498 98.63 1.37
6. 2.36 6 6504 98.72 1.28
7. 0.425 6 6510 98.82 1.18
8. 0.075 - - - -
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………


Type of Sample: ….Stone Dust Test No……01

OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. % Wt.
(gm)
1. 75 00 00 100
00
2. 53 00 00 00 100
3. 26.5 00 00 00 100
4. 9.5 00 00 00 100
5. 4.75 22 22 1.47 98.53
6. 2.36 356 378 25.2 74.8
7. 0.425 820 1198 79.87 20.13
8. 0.075 186 1384 92.27 7.73
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………


Type of Sample: ….Stone Dust Test No……02

OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. % Cum. Wt. % Wt.
(gm)
1. 75 00 00 100
00
2. 53 00 00 00 100
3. 26.5 00 00 00 100
4. 9.5 00 00 00 100
5. 4.75 20 20 1.33 98.67
6. 2.36 262 282 18.8 81.2
7. 0.425 844 1126 75.07 24.93
8. 0.075 240 1366 91.07 8.93
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………
AVERAGE OF PERCENTAGE PASSING

Type of Sample: ….GSBTest No……02

Location/Source: …LAB. SITE Date of Sampling: .08-05-2014
Date of Testing: …08-05-2014
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sl. Sieve size

No. (mm) % Passing 40mm
% Passing 10mm % Passing Stone Dust
1. 75 100 100
100
2. 53 100 100 100
3. 26.5 42.18 100 100
4. 9.5 0.02 73.50 100

5. 4.75 - 1.12 98.6
6. 2.36 1.01 78.00
7. 0.425 0.94 22.53
8. 0.075 - 8.33
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
JOB MIX FORMULA FOR GSB

Type of Sample: ….GSBTrial No…..01

Location/Source: …LAB. SITE Date of Sampling: .08-05-2014
Date of Testing: …08-05-2014
Sieve size
(mm) ( 40 mm) ( 10 mm) ( stone dust ) ALL IN % LIMIT AS
Passing % 20% Passing % 30% Passing % 50% PASSING PER CA
75.00 100 20 100 30 100 50 100 100
53.00 100 20 100 30 100 50 100 100
26.5 42.18 8.44 100 30 100 50 88.44 70 - 100
9.5 0.02 0.004 73.50 22.05 100 50 72.05 50 - 80
4.75 - - 1.12 0.34 98.6 49.3 49.64 40 – 65
2.36 1.01 0.30 78.00 39.00 39.30 30 – 50
0.425 0.94 0.28 22.53 11.27 11.55 15 – 25
0.075 - - 8.33 4.17 4.17 3 - 10
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
GRADATION FOR GSB


Type of Sample: ….GSB Test No…01

Location/Source: …PLANT SITE Date of Sampling: ...08-05-2014
BLENDINING PROPORTION
40mm20% 2000gm
10mm 30% 3000gm
Dust 50% 5000gm
Total Weight 10000gm

OBSERVATION SHEET

75.0 00 00 00 100 100 - -
53.0 00 00 00 100 80-100 100 -
26.5 1232 1232 12.32 87.68 55-90 70-100 100
9.50 1456 2688 26.88 73.12 35-65 50-80 65-95
4.75 2451 5139 51.39 48.61 25-55 40-65 50-80
2.36 965 6104 61.04 38.96 20-40 30-50 40-65
0.425 2844 8948 89.48 10.52 10-25 15-25 20-35
0.075 685 9633 96.33 3.67 3-10 3-10 3-10
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
GRADATION FOR GSB


Type of Sample: ….GSB Test No…02

Location/Source: …PLANT SITE Date of Sampling: ...02-06-2014
BLENDINING PROPORTION
40mm 20% 2000gm
10mm 30% 3000gm
Dust 50% 5000gm
Total Weight 10000gm
OBSERVATION SHEET

75.0 00 00 00 100 100 - -
53.0 00 00 00 100 80-100 100 -
26.5 1120 1120 11.20 88.80 55-90 70-100 100
9.50 1204 2324 23.24 76.76 35-65 50-80 65-95
4.75 2804 5128 51.28 48.72 25-55 40-65 50-80
2.36 772 5900 59.00 41.00 20-40 30-50 40-65
0.425 3025 8925 89.25 10.75 10-25 15-25 20-35
0.075 690 9615 96.15 3.85 3-10 3-10 3-10
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………

Type of Sample: ……..GSB Test No….……01

Location/Source: …….LAB Date of Sampling: ..20-05-2014
Volume of mould (V): .2250cc. Date of Testing: …...20-05-2014
Water Added (%) 2 4 6 8 10 12
Wt. of Empty Mould =M1(gm) 6106 6106 6106 6106 6106 6106
Wt. of Mould + Compacted Material=M2(gm) 11384 11660 11830 11906 11934 11892
Wt. of Compacted sample M = M2- M1 (gm) 5276 5554 5724 5800 5828 5786
Volume of sample = V (cc) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
Bulk Density of material γ = M/V ( gm/cc) 2.345 2.468 2.544 2.577 2.590 2.571
Container No. 04 05 22 24 16 23
Wt. of Container= W1(gm) 128.7 122.2 126.5 121.0 124.6 127.5
Wt. of Wet material + container = W2( gm) 355.8 321.1 351.7 387.3 392.3 401.3
Wt. of Oven Dry material + cont. = W3 ( gm) 350.9 313.5 340.1 367.5 366.6 370.1
Wt. of water W5= W2-W3 (gm 4.9 7.6 11.6 19.8 25.7 31.2
Wt. of Dry material W4= W3-W1 (gm) 222.2 191.3 213.6 246.5 242.0 242.6
Water Content, W % = W5/W4 *100 2.21 3.97 5.43 8.03 10.62 12.86
Dry density yd = γ X 100/(wc+100)gm/ cc 2.294 2.374 2.413 2.385 2.341 2.278
15 4.89 450 55 5 6.0 2.412
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………
C.B.R TEST
(As per IS: 2720 Part XVI)
Type of Sample: …GSBTest No….01

Location/Source: ..LAB SITEVolume of Mould (V): …2250cc.
Correction factor…7.064KgSoaking Period: ..96hrsDate of Casting: ...21-05-2014
M.D.D: …2.412 g/cc O.M.C: …6.0 %Date of Testing: ..25-05-2014
Before After Before After Before After

soaking soaking soaking soaking soaking soaking
Wt. of Mould + Wet Soil = W1 gm 12452 12464 12582 12590
Wt. of Mould = W2 gm 6706 6706 6802 6802
Wet of Wet Soil, W3 = W1 – W2 5746 5758 5780 5788
Bulk Density of Soil(Уd) = W3/V gm/cc 2.554 2.559 2.569 2.572
Container No. 06 05 17 04
Weight of Container = w1 gm 137.4 122.1 144.3 128.7
Wt. of wet soil + Container = w2 gm 415.8 362.4 380.5 402.0
Wt. of Oven dry soil + Container = w3 gm 395.8 347.2 365.7 384.3
Wt. of Water w1 = w2 –w3 gm 20.0 15.2 14.8 17.7
Wt. of Dry soil w = w3 –w1 gm 258.4 225.1 221.4 255.6
Water Content % = w1/w x 100 7.74 6.75 6.68 6.92

Dry Density 2.370 2.397 2.408 2.406
УdX 100 / (mc +100)gm/cc
Load Test: CBR = Pt / Ps X 100(Ps=1370kg at 2.5mm , Ps = 2055 kg at 5mm)
Mould No.
(mm)Penetration
Readings
kgLoad
Avg. CBR
Readings
Readings
kgLoad
kgLoad
CBR%
CBR%
CBR%
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.5 04 28.256 08 56.512
1.0 14 98.896 22 155.408
1.5 31 218.984 48 339.072
2.0 55 388.52 80 565.12
2.5 80 565.12 41.25 117 826.488 60.33 50.79
3.0 110 777.04 160 1130.24
4.0 180 1271.52 249 1758.94
5.0 255 1801.32 87.66 333 2352.31 114.47 101.06
7.5 460 3249.44 565 3991.16
10.0 670 4732.88 786 5552.30
12.5
Remark…................................................................................ CBR Value (%) = ..101.06 %
ATTERBERG LIMITS


Tested by…………. Date of Testing: ………..…….
OBSERVATION SHEET
LIQUID LIMIT
Number of Blows
Container No.
PLASTIC LIMIT
Container No.

RESULT: Liquid Limit=……….%, Plastic Limit=…………%, Plasticity Index=……………%
GRADATION FOR DAC(Grade 1st )

(As per IS 2386 Pt-1)
Type of Sample: ….DAC Test No…01

Location/Source: …PLANT SITE Date of Sampling:
Weight of Sample….9475grm Date of Testing: 27-05-14
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage PERMISSIBLE

Size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing LIMIT
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
26.5 0 0 0 100 100
19 332 332 3.50 96.50 79-100
13.2 1856 2188 23.09 76.91 59-79
9.5 1136 3324 35.08 64.92 52-72
4.75 1616 4940 52.14 47.86 35-55
2.36 986 5926 62.54 37.46 28-44
1.18 1180 7106 74.99 25.00 20-34
0.600 596 7702 81.28 18.71 15-27
0.300 556 8258 87.15 12.84 10-20
0.150 394 8652 91.31 8.68 5-13
0.75 246 8898 93.91 6.09 2-8
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………
GRADATION FOR DAC(Grade IInd)

(As per IS 2386 Pt-1)
Type of Sample: DAC Test No: 1

Location/Source: …PLANT SITE Date of Sampling: ...
Weight of Sample…. 9460grm Date of Testing: 30-05-14
OBSERVATION SHEET
Sieve Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage PERMISSIBLE

Size Retained Wt. Retained Retained Passing LIMIT
(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
19 0 0 0 100 100
13.2 1240 1240 13.11 86.89 79-100
9.5 650 1890 19.98 80.02 70-88
4.75 2278 4168 44.06 55.94 53-71
2.36 776 4944 52.26 47.74 42-58
1.18 1360 6304 66.64 33.36 34-48
0.600 708 7012 74.12 25.88 26-38
0.300 764 7776 82.20 17.80 18-28
0.150 518 8294 87.67 12.33 12-20
0.75 438 8732 92.30 7.70 4-7
Remarks: …………………………………………………………………………………

COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM
(As per MORTH TABLE 500-10)

Type of Sample: ..DBM20mm-38%Dust-32.5%Test No….01

Location/Source: …LAB. 10mm -10%Lime-2% Date of Sampling: ...23-05-14
Weight of Sample…9550 g06mm - 13% VG-30- 4.5% Date of Testing: …23-05-14
(gm) (%)
1. 37.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 26.5 00 00 00 100 90-100
3. 19 692 692 7.25 92.75 71-95
4. 13.2 2418 3110 32.57 67.43 56-80
5. 4.75 2794 5904 61.82 38.18 38-54
6. 2.36 996 6900 72.25 27.75 28-42
7. 0.300 1710 8610 90.16 9.84 7-21
8. 0.075 662 9272 97.09 2.91 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………
(Lab Engineer)( Contractor’s Rep.) J.E.(Civil) A.G.E/Engineer-In-Charge
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR PQC

Type of Sample: .PQC Test No….01

Location/Source: .PLANT SITE Date of Sampling: .07-06-14
Weight of Sample…10000 gDateof Testing: .07-06-14
(gm) (%)
1. 31.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 26.5 356 356 3.56 96.44 85-95
3. 19 2280 2636 26.36 73.64 68-88
4. 9.5 1856 4492 44.92 55.08 45-65
5. 4.75 2354 6846 68.46 31.54 30-55
6. 600 micron 852 7698 76.98 23.02 8-30
7. 150 micron 2206 9904 99.04 0.96 5-15
8. 75 42 9946 99.46 0.54 0-5

micron
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

MAXIMUM THEORETICALSPECIFIC GRAVITY OF MIX

OBSERVATION

with water D
A =w2-w1
sample and water E
mix Gtm =A/[A+D-E]
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
(LAB ENGINEER) (CONTRACTOR’S REP.) J.E.(CIVIL) A.G.E (LAB)
MAXIMUM THEORETICALSPECIFIC GRAVITY OF MIX


OBSERVATION
S.NO. Description Unit Trial-I Trial-II

with water D
A =w2-w1
sample and water E
mix Gtm =A/[A+D-E]
7 AVERAGE -
Remarks: ………………………………………………………………………………………
(LAB ENGINEER) (CONTRACTOR’S REP.) J.E.(CIVIL) A.G.E (LAB)

COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM (GRADE-I OF TRIAL -I)

Type of Sample: ..DBM 40mm -18% Dust- 35.5% Test No….01

Location/Source: …LAB. 20mm - 25% Lime-2% Date of Sampling: ...23-09-14
Weight of Sample…9550 g10mm - 15% VG-30- 4.5% Date of Testing: ……23-09-14
(gm) (%)
1. 45 00 00 00 100 100
2. 37.5 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 26.5 1172 1172 12.27 87.73 63-95
4. .13.2 2996 4168 43.64 56.36 55-75
5. 4.75 1690 5858 61.34 38.66 38-54
6. 2.36 624 6482 67.87 32.12 28-42
7. .300 2090 8572 89.76 10.24 7-21
8. .075 474 9046 94.72 5.27 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………

COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM (GRADE-I OF TRIAL -II)


Location/Source: …LAB. 20mm - 20% Lime-2% Date of Sampling: ...23-09-14
Weight of Sample…9550 g10mm - 7.5% VG-30- 4.5% Date of Testing: ……23-09-14
06mm - 7.5
(gm) (%)
1. 45 00 00 00 100 100
2. 37.5 00 00 00 100 95-100
3. 26.5 1526 1526 15.98 84.02 63-95
4. .13.2 2262 3788 39.66 60.34 55-75
5. 4.75 1800 5588 58.91 41.49 38-54
6. 2.36 806 6394 66.95 33.05 28-42
7. .300 2080 8474 88.73 11.27 7-21
8. .075 532 9006 94.30 5.70 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………

COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM (GRADE-II OF TRIAL -I)


Location/Source: …LAB.20mm - 33% Lime-2% Date of Sampling: ...23-09-14
(gm) (%)
1. 37.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 26.5 550 550 5.76 94.24 90-100
3. 19.0 1356 1906 19.96 80.04 71-95
4. 13.2 1536 3442 36.04 63.96 56-80
5. 4.75 2478 5920 61.99 38.01 38-54
6. 2.36 664 6584 68.94 31.06 28-42
7. 0.300 2020 8604 90.09 9.91 7-21
8. 0.075 682 9286 97.23 2.77 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM (GRADE-II OF TRIAL -II)


Location/Source: …LAB.20mm - 33% Lime-2% Date of Sampling: ...23-09-14
06mm – 8%
(gm) (%)
1. 37.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 26.5 650 650 6.80 93.19 90-100
3. 19.0 1434 2084 21.82 78.17 71-95
4. 13.2 1630 3714 38.82 61.10 56-80
5. 4.75 2174 5888 61.65 38.34 38-54
6. 2.36 814 6702 70.17 29.82 28-42
7. 0.300 2010 8712 91.22 8.77 7-21
8. 0.075 486 9198 96.31 3.68 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………
COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADING FOR DBM


Type of Sample: ..DBM 20mm -21.97% Dust- 28.65% Test No….01
Location/Source: …LAB.10mm -22.92% Lime-1.91%Date of Sampling: ...24-10-14
Weight of Sample…9550 g06mm - 20.05% VG-30- 4.5%Date of Testing: …24-10-14
(gm) (%)
1. 37.5 00 00 00 100 100
2. 26.5 00 00 00 100 90-100
3. 19.0 730 730 7.64 92.36 71-95
4. 13.2 1713 2443 25.58 74.42 56-80
5. 4.75 2834 5277 55.26 44.74 38-54
6. 2.36 1202 6479 67.84 32.16 28-42
7. 0.300 1763 8242 86.30 13.70 7-21
8. 0.075 1010 9252 96.88 3.12 2-8
Remark-………………………………………………………………………………………………
Lab EngineerContractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) A.G.E LAB


Type of Sample: …10mmTest No….……

Location/Source:……KABRAI .Date of Sampling: ...23.04.16
Bulk Density
(Kg/l)
1 Wt. of Empty density measure(W1) Kg 9.03 9.03
2 Wt. of material + density measure (W2) Kg 31.245 31.450
3 Wt. of material W= W2-W1 Kg 22.215 22.420
4 Volume of density measure (V) lit 15.00 15.00
5 Bulk density W/ V Kg / lit 1.481 1.495 1.488
Date of Testing: … 23.04.16
OBSERVATION SHEET
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Type of Sample: …20mmTest No….……

Location/Source:……KABRAI.Date of Sampling: ...23.04.16
Bulk Density
(Kg/l)
OBSERVATION SHEET
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Type of Sample: …26.5mmTest No….……

Location/Source:……KABRAI.Date of Sampling: ...23.04.16
Bulk Density
(Kg/l)
OBSERVATION SHEET
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Type of Sample: …26.5MMTest No……….. Location/Source: …KABRAI

Date of Sampling: ...21.04.16
OBSERVATION SHEET
1 Wt. of sample in water(W1) gm 1735.5
2 Wt. of empty basket in water (W2) gm 00
3 Wt. of saturated surface dry gm 2788.5

sample(W3)
4 Wt. of oven dried sample(W4) gm 2788
5 Specific Gravity = 2.647 2.647

W4 / W3 – (W1-W2)
6 Water Absorption = % 0.05 0.05
W3- W4 / W4 X100
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Type of Sample: …20MMTest No……….. Location/Source: …KABRAI

OBSERVATION SHEET
1 Wt. of sample in water(W1) gm 1401.5
3 Wt. of saturated surface dry gm 2249.5

sample(W3)
4 Wt. of oven dried sample(W4) gm 2248

W4 / W3 – (W1-W2)
W3- W4 / W4 X100
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Type of Sample: …10MMTest No……….. Location/Source: …KABRAI

OBSERVATION SHEET
1 Wt. of sample in water(W1) gm 667
3 Wt. of saturated surface dry gm 1046.

sample(W3)
4 Wt. of oven dried sample(W4) gm 1044.5

W4 / W3 – (W1-W2)
W3- W4 / W4 X100
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Type of Sample: …Natural sand Test No….…… Location/Source:

…………….. Date of Sampling: ...01.05.16
OBSERVATION
Height of calibrating Cylinder = 15 cm.
Diameter of calibrating Cylinder = 10 cm.
Volume of calibrating Cylinder V =π D 2 H / 4
= (3.14x10x10x15)/4
= 1177.5 cm3
Determination of Sand Weight in Cone
S.No. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2
1 Wt. of pouring Sand g 6500 6500
with Cylinder (w1)
2 Wt. of Sand & Cylinder after Pouring of g 6144 6148
Sand on plane surface (w2)
3 Wt. of Sand in Cone W= (w1-w2) g 356 352
4 Average Wt. of Sand in Cone (w3) g 354

S.No. Description Unit Trial-1 Trial-2
1 Wt. of pouringSand with cylinder(w1) g 6500 6500
2 Wt. of Cylinder and Sand after Filling g 4556 4560

caibratingCylinder(w4)
3 Wt. of Sand Filling Calibrating Cylinder g 1944 1940
and cone w5=(w1-w4-w3)
4 Wt. of Sand in cone (w3) g 354 354
5 Wt. of Sand Filling Calibrating g 1590 1586

Cylinderw6=(w5-w3)
6 Volume of Calibrating Cylinder(V) Cm3 1177.5 1177.5
7 Bulk Density of Sand =w6/V g/cc 1.35 1.347
8 Average Bulk density of Sand g/cc 1.349
Remark ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GRADATION FOR SOIL STABILISATION WITH CEMENT


OBSERVATION SHEET

(mm) (gm) (gm) (%) (%)
75.0
53.0
26.5
9.50
4.75
2.36
0.425
0.075
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DEGREE OF PULVERISATION
Name of work : Re-surfacing / Strengthening of Runway at AF Station Chakeri, Kanpur
Type of Sample: ……. Test No….……
Location/Source: …………….. Date of Testing: ………

A On IS Sieve 26.5 mm Unit Detail
i Sample of pulverized soil ( W1) g 1000
ii Wt. of Sample Retained on 26.5mm sieve (W2) g
iii Wt. of sample Retained after pulverization 26.5mm sieve (W3) g
iv Degree of pulverisation - (w1-w2)/ (w1-w3) *100 %
v Permissible Limit *minimum) by Wt. % 100
B On IS Sieve 5.6mm Unit
i Sample of pulverized soil ( W1) g 1000
ii Wt. of Sample Retained on 5.6mm sieve (W2) g
iii Wt. of sample Retained after pulverisation 5.6mm sieve (W3) g
iv Degree of pulverisation - (w1-w2)/ (w1-w3) *100 %
v Permissible Limit *minimum) by Wt. % 80
Remark : ………………………………………………………………………………..


SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR 31.5 MM AGGREGATE
(As per IS: 383)
Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, K ANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No………..

OBSERVATION TABLE
Sr. Wt. Cumulative Percentage Percentage Permissible

No. retained (gm) wt. retained Cumulative wt. passing Limits
(gm) wt. retained (%) (%)
(%)
1 31.5 100
2 26.5 85-100
3 20 0-30
4 10 0-5
Remarks: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Ductility Test (After Tfot) : (As Per IS: 1208)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ductility Test (After Tfot) : (As Per IS: 1208)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DUCTILITY TEST(After TFOT)

(As per IS: 1208)

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Period of Cooling at Room Temperature : …..…min (30min- 40min)

Period of Cooling in Water Bath (before Trimming) : ……..min (Minimum 30 min)

Actual Test Temperature : 27ºC

Rate of Pull : ……..mm/min

SL. Description Test Mould No. Average Permissible Limit

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

SOFTENING POINT TEST

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: PMB-40…………….… Test No…01.……

Sample Description Temperature at which the Average Value of Permissible Limit

2 Ball No.- 2 84.1

Rep of Maruti Bitumen J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

SOFTENING POINT TEST

Type of Sample: …………….… Test No….……

Sample Description Temperature at which the Average Value of Permissible Limit

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civil) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

FLASH & FIRE POINT TEST

Type of Sample: …………….… Test No….……

Description Trial -1 Trial-2 Average Value Permissible Limit

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: PMB-40……………… Test No…01.……

Penetration (1/10mm) Permissible

Rep. of Maruti Bitumen J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

PENETRATION TEST FOR BITUMEN/PMB

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Penetration (1/10mm) Permissible

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

DETERMINATION OF SOFTENING POINT FOR BITUMEN/PMB

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Description Temperature at which Ball-I Temperature at which Ball- Min. Permissible

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

DETERMINATION OF SOFTENING POINT FOR BITUMEN/PMB

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

Elapsed Ball I Ball II

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMEN/PMB

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

2. Mass of specific gravity with Water (b),gm

3. Mass of Specific gravity bottle about half

4. Mass of specific gravity bottle about half

5. Specific gravity of Bitumen= (c-a)/(b-a)-(d-c)

6. Average Specific Gravity

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

DETERMINATION OF GLASS FIBER IN GLASS GRID

Name of work : RE-SURFACING / STRENGTHENING OF RUNWAY AT AF STATION CHAKERI, KANPUR

Type of Sample: ……………… Test No….……

1. Mass of glass grid of 1 sqf piece (a),g

Result : White shiney colour glass fiber observed.

Lab Engineer Contractor’s Rep. J.E.(Civ) ENGR-IN-CHARGE

Re-surfacing / Strengthening of Runway at AF Station Chakeri, Kanpur

Type of Sample: PMB-40 Test No: 1

Specimen Length of Thread (cm) Difference % Average Min.

Before Cut After Cut

10 0.1 9.1 91 85% Min.