Process Engineering HAZOP Procedure: Petroleum Development Oman L.L.C

`
RESTRICTED Document ID: PR-1696

Dec 2008 Filing Key: Business
Control
Petroleum Development Oman L.L.C.
Process Engineering
HAZOP Procedure
User Note:
The requirements of this document are mandatory. Non-compliance shall only be authorised by
the Document Owner or his Delegate through STEP-OUT approval.
A controlled copy of the current version of this document is on PDO's EDMS. Before making
reference to this document, it is the user's responsibility to ensure that any hard copy, or
electronic copy, is current. For assistance, contact the Document Custodian or the Document
Controller.
Users are encouraged to participate in the ongoing improvement of this document by providing
constructive FEDback.
Please familiarise yourself with the

Document Security Classification Definitions
They also apply to this Document!
Revision:2.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec08
This page was intentionally left blank

i Document Authorization
Page 2 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision:2.0
i Revision History
The following is a brief summary of the 4 most recent revisions to this document. Details of all
revisions prior to these are held on file by the issuing department.
Version No. Date Author Scope / Remarks

1.0 15 July 2006 Ross Weiter First Issue
Randa Nabulsi
2.0 Dec 2008 Randa Nabulsi Second Issue
ii Related Business Processes

Code Business Process (EPBM 4.0)
EP.64 Design, Construct, Modify and De-Commission Facilities
iii Related Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF)

Documents
The related CMF Documents can be retrieved from the Corporate Business Control
Documentation Register CMF
Code Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF) Document

CP-117 Project Engineering Code of Practice

Revision:2.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i Revision History...................................................................................................................... 3
ii Related Business Processes .................................................................................................. 3
iii Related Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF) Documents ........................................ 3
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.1 Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 5
1.4 Scope................................................................................................................................ 6
1.5 Objective ........................................................................................................................... 6
1.6 Fundamentals of this Procedure....................................................................................... 6
1.7 Distribution/Target Audience ............................................................................................ 6
1.8 Review and Improvement ................................................................................................. 6
1.9 Deviations from this Procedure ........................................................................................ 6
2 Roles and Responsibilities ..................................................................................................... 7
2.1 PDO Process Engineering Discipline ............................................................................... 7
2.2 PDO Project Engineer ...................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Contractor Project Engineer ............................................................................................. 8
2.4 HAZOP Leader ................................................................................................................. 8
2.5 General ............................................................................................................................. 9
2.6 Drawings and Templates ................................................................................................ 10
2.7 Design Review and Main HAZOP................................................................................... 12
Appendix 1 HAZOP Worksheet .................................................................................................. 13
Appendix 2 HAZOP Action Response Form ............................................................................... 15
Appendix 3 HAZOP Team Member FEDback Form .................................................................. 16
Appendix 4 HAZOP Introduction Presentation ........................................................................... 17

Revision:2.0
1 Introduction
1.1 Abbreviations
BFD Basis For Design
C&A Control and Automation
CFDH Corporate Function Discipline Head
EP Exploration & Production
ERD Engineering Reference Document
FED Front End Design (“Define” phase)
F&G Fire and Gas
HAZOP Hazard and Operability (Study)
HFP Hazard and Operability Studies Focal Point
HL Hazard and Operability Study Leader(s)
OPMG Opportunity and Project Management Guide
PE Project Engineer(s)
PEFS Process Engineering Flow Scheme (Shell terminology, same as P&ID)
PFS Process Flow Scheme
PSFS Process Safeguarding Flow Scheme
PR PDO Procedure
TA Technical Authority
UEF Process Engineering Discipline functional indicator in PDO, as of 2006
1.2 Background
Safety is a primary focus for all plant design and operation.
Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOPs) are a key component in ensuring safety. Hence
satisfactory HAZOP execution and follow-up are critical to business performance.
This procedure is one part of a continued effort to improve the execution of HAZOPs in PDO.
1.3 Purpose
This document serves the following purposes:
1. It gives roles and responsibilities documenting how the Shell HSE Manual EP95-0313
HAZOP is implemented in PDO.
2. It gives clarifications, additions and amendments to EP95-0313, based on best industry
practice, local contracting arrangements, past history and past experience.
3. Templates are given for relevant PDO documents, for consistency.
It is not the intention to duplicate the contents of EP95-0313. It is assumed that the reader of this
procedure already knows EP95-0313.

Revision:2.0
1.4 Scope
This procedure covers the full lifecycle of any HAZOP study, from preparation to closeout. Its
use is mandatory for all persons involved in HAZOP studies and by all projects. Terminology is
as follows:
• Shall indicates mandatory requirement
• Should indicates preference
1.5 Objective
The objective of this document is to achieve more effective project planning and shorter project
execution and delivery. It gives a clear procedure on how PDO does HAZOPs, thus preventing
misunderstandings among the involved parties.
This objective will be achieved by the process discipline taking closer ownership of the entire
HAZOP process and quality.
1.6 Fundamentals of this Procedure

This document is based on:
• PDO current practice,
• the principles contained in the Shell document HSE Manual HAZOP 95-0313,
• information from PDO’s HAZOP training consultant, and
• local conditions and specific requirements.
The aim is thus to change the PDO current practice, while following the EP guideline. However
since the EP guideline is (a) 11 years old and (b) generic, this document incorporates the latest
industry practices and PDO-specific considerations.
1.7 Distribution/Target Audience

The key users of this procedure are Hazop Leaders (HL) who are generally Process Engineers,
Project Engineers (PE) and the process engineering discipline leadership in both PDO and
Contractor companies.
The target audience is all persons involved in HAZOP preparation, execution and follow-up, as
defined in EP95-0313.
1.8 Review and Improvement

This HAZOP procedure shall be reviewed and, if necessary, updated annually in order to ensure
that it reflects the current position with regard to Company Policies, Management Systems,
Procedures, Specifications, Guidelines and Organisation structure.
1.9 Deviations from this Procedure

Any deviations from this procedure requires Process CFDH approval, as detailed in the Project
Change Control & Standards Variance Procedure PR-1247.

Revision:2.0
2 Roles and Responsibilities
2.1 PDO Process Engineering Discipline

The PDO Process Engineering CFDH is responsible for Approval of Variances to this procedure,
see Section 1.9.
The PDO Process Engineering CFDH or delegate or designated PDO HAZOPs Focal Point
(HFP) shall be responsible for:
• Content and upkeep of the HAZOP procedure.
• Training, assessment and approval of HL, see Section 3.1. Upkeep of current list of
Approved HL on the UEP website:
http://sww.pdo.shell.om/sites/UEOD/CFDH/UEF/HAZOP/Forms/Ross.aspx
• Approving the HL proposed by the PDO PE or sourcing an alternative. The HFP role is to:
o estimate the duration of the HAZOP,
o the proposed HL is suitable for the complexity of that particular HAZOP, and
o ensure that all HL get regular practice.
• Reviewing, compiling and implementing FEDback from HAZOP members.
• Auditing of HAZOPs to monitor quality.
• Removal of HL from approved list.
• Resolution of any disputes.
2.2 PDO Project Engineer

The PDO PE shall be responsible for the following items.
• Planning of the HAZOP start date.
• Sourcing a HL from the HAZOP Leader List web link in Section 2.1, confirming availability,
and proposing the candidate to the Process Engineering Discipline HFP for approval to lead
that particular HAZOP (Section 2.1). The HFP should be contacted at least 6 weeks in
advance of the originally scheduled HAZOP start date.
Also given to the HFP at the same time shall be the proposed start date of the HAZOP and a
Process Flow Scheme or equivalent sketch which clearly shows the scope of the HAZOP.
This shall be sufficient to allow estimation of how long the HAZOP will take and how
experienced the HL needs to be.
• Nominating all HAZOP Team members for review by HL. Normally the HL should approve
nominees, unless numbers or expertise does not appear appropriate, see Sect. 3.1 and 3.3.
• Ensure that an Operators Representative is present at the HAZOP, and aware that a
contribution from him is expected at the introduction, see Section 3.1.
• Distribution and collection of HAZOP Team Member FEDback forms (Appendix 3) from all
participants, and forwarding them to the HFP on the following day.
• Review of draft and acceptance (sign) of the final HAZOP Report, see Section 3.2.
• Actioning of each individual PDO HAZOP Action Response Form.
• Approval of (sign) each closed individual HAZOP Action Response Form.
• Generation of a HAZOP Action Close Out Status Report at the end of FED, see Section 3.2.
This may be done with Contractor assistance, if required.

Revision:2.0
2.3 Contractor Project Engineer

The Contractor PE shall be responsible for the following items.
• Organisation of the HAZOP venue, logistics and equipment (e.g. computer, projector,
notepads, highlighters, tape to fix drawings to walls). See Section 3.1.
• Providing the HL and Team Members with an Information Pack at least 7 days prior to the
HAZOP study. The Design Review close-out status shall also be made available to the HL at
this time. This should be in the format of the Design Review Closeout Report, if available,
even in draft format. The HL shall be given enough information to allow him to make a
judgement on ability to go ahead with HAZOP. Failure to meet these responsibilities may
result in HAZOP being delayed. Also see Section 3.3.
• Supplying A1 or A0 drawings of all PEFS, PFS (preferably PSFS if available) and Plot
Plan(s) to the HAZOP room. Somewhere inc requirement for reviewing C&E during HAZOP
at the end.
• Supplying the HAZOP Secretary, also see Section 3.1.
• Ensure that all relevant Contractor persons know they will be expected to give an
introduction at the HAZOP (normally the Contractor Process Engineer and Contractor C&A
Engineer). Also see Section 3.1.
• Approval of the HAZOP Report, see Section 3.2.
• Actioning and close-out approval (sign) of each individual HAZOP Action Response Form,
for Contractor actions only.
2.4 HAZOP Leader

The HL shall be responsible for the following items:
• Deciding to either run the study with start date as scheduled by the PDO PE or delay it, see
Section 3.3.
• Finalising the duration of the HAZOP study upon receipt of the HAZOP Information Pack
and informing the PDO PE within 24 hours.
• Ensuring that the positions nominated by PDO PE are experts appropriate to the project and
systems under review.
• Provision of HAZOP worksheets for all individual nodes, with headers filled up same as
shown in the Appendix 1 example. The headers are checked as each node is introduced.
• Ensuring a proper introduction at the beginning of the HAZOP study and at the beginning of
each node, ref. Section 3.1.
• Controlling the number of persons present at the HAZOP study, ref. Section 3.1.
• Ensuring that any HAZOP of more than 2 days duration does not run for more than 8
working hours a day, with appropriate breaks.
• Marking up PEFS displayed on walls. Also see Section 3.2. This can be delegated to the
Design Contractor for execution.
• Marking up the HAZOP Master Set PEFS in A3 format. Also see Section 3.2. This can be
delegated to the Design Contractor for execution.
• Ensuring that responsible parties are assigned to all actions before the HAZOP meeting is
closed.
• Approval of the HAZOP Report and HAZOP Master Set PEFS, see Section 3.2.EP95-0313
Clarifications, Additions and Changes

Revision:2.0
2.5 General
• The responsibility of the HL is to carry out an objective HAZOP study, regardless of project
pressures. Therefore the HL shall be independent from the design team and shall not accept
an assignment where there is an actual or implied conflict of interest etc. (see Section 2.1
and 2.2). Hence when the project involves a design contractor, the HL should be selected
from outside the contractor’s team, wherever this is possible.
• The maximum number of members present in a HAZOP study at any one time shall be 12,
except for the introduction on the first day. If more than 12 persons are required, the non-
core members should be called in as and when required. If more than 12 persons are still in
the room after the introduction the HL shall decide who is not required and shall not start
until the number is 12 or less.
In special cases, if >12 persons absolutely cannot be avoided, such as for complex projects
with multiple contractors, an approved variance to this procedure will be required prior to
starting the HAZOP, see Section 1.9.
• HAZOP duration shall be estimated using L=1.5 for inexperienced leaders, from EP95-0313,
Table 3.3.
• The Process Engineering Discipline will approve HL by 2 pathways:
o PDO-approved HAZOP course + training in this procedure + completion of at least
one satisfactory HAZOP which will be monitored by an already-approved HL
assigned as mentor.
o Personal interview with Process CFDH demonstrating ability, knowledge of EP95-
0313 and of this procedure.
• Team members should normally not be duplicated between PDO and Contractor, for
disciplines other than Process Engineering and C&A Engineering.
• The HAZOP Secretary shall meet the following minimum standards:
o Attendance at 3 previous HAZOPs as team member
o Adequate ability to understand and type in English
o Working in oil & gas industry for a minimum of 2 years in a technical role
The HAZOP Secretary should be capable of filling in the HAZOP worksheet without needing
to be dictated to by the Leader or others, as this greatly reduces the quality of the study by
diverting attention. To do so, he must understand the discussion, hence the minimum
standards above. If the HAZOP Secretary is shown to be inadequate to the task, the HL
shall give his duties to another HAZOP team member and excuse him from the study.
• The HAZOP shall not start, or continue, without these following persons (as well as the
Leader and the Secretary) being present in the room, all of whom must be thoroughly
familiar with the project and not last-minute substitutes:
o PDO Process Engineer
o Contractor Process Engineer
o C&A Engineer (PDO or Contractor)
o Operators Representative
This is a minimum benchmark, normally more people will be required.
• A HAZOP introduction shall be provided at the start of any HAZOP study (typically lasting
approx 2 hours for a 5 day HAZOP), unless all the HAZOP team members have been to the
Design Review and this design review covered all the bullet points listed below. In the
HAZOP introduction, presentations shall be given by the following persons

Revision:2.0
o HAZOP Leader:
 Before other disciplines: welcome, introduction to HAZOP, identify persons
new to PDO HAZOP, check all are available for duration.
 After other disciplines: explain guidewords, briefly describe all nodes and
agree them with HAZOP team, refer to (Appendix-4) for an Introduction
Presentation.
o Process Engineer: describe scope of study, overall process flow, mass balance,
pressures, temperatures and other major safety risks (e.g. H2S, steam); point out
locations of main design condition and materials spec changes.
o Project Engineer: explain project objectives, purpose of HAZOP within project,
outline previous reviews (e.g. Design Review and Coarse HAZOP) and highlight
still-open actions, commercial, technical, schedule constraints and issues, plot plan
layout.
o C&A Engineer: describe overall process control, discuss different control modes if
applicable, process and emergency shutdown causes and effects, F&G system.
o Operators Representative: give past experience with similar plant, manning, what is
expected operators involvement in plant operation, started-up and shutdown, also
list any concerns about the design.
• An introduction shall be provided for each node, at the start of the review of that node. This
normally takes the format of the HL or the Process Engineer going through the node’s
features, including a review of the HAZOP worksheet header (Appendix 1).
• As per EP95-0313, Section 2.12.2 “representation from eventual operators of the plant is
essential” at a HAZOP. It should be clear that eventual operators of the plant are not the
support engineers based in the Muscat office, but rather field-based personnel, or
alternatively ex-field based personnel familiar with that location and practices.
• When a HAZOP is not required: refer to Figure 3.2 of EP95-0313.
• The HAZOP venue is important and shall be selected according to these criteria:
o Size - the room shall be of size appropriate to the number of attendees. Rooms that
are too large are inappropriate: it is difficult to see even the A0-size drawings stuck
on walls, difficult to hear people (also due to noisy air conditioning), team does not
interact efficiently and side-discussions proliferate.
o Wall space: there shall be sufficient blank walls for attaching the A0 drawings. Many
rooms, particularly in hotels, are unsuitable due to drapes, pillars and other
adornments.
o Seating: this should be so that all HAZOP members can see each other.
o Either a whiteboard (not used for projecting) or a paper flip chart should be available
to assist in discussions.
2.6 Drawings and Templates

• Only PDO templates shall be used for worksheets and Action Response Forms.
• HAZOP worksheets shall have the following features (Appendix 1):
o Closed action should be used whenever possible. Closed actions (instructions)
should be made when the team agrees that the solution is within their level of
competency.
o The word ‘consider’ or synonyms shall never be used in HAZOP worksheets.

Revision:2.0
o The only changes allowed to the worksheets after finishing the HAZOP study and
with the Leader not present shall be cosmetic, i.e. restricted to formatting, drafting,
spelling etc. No changes shall be made that could change the meaning of the
content.
o HAZOP worksheets do not get signed.
o “Priority” as on the worksheet shall be for both schedule priority and risk priority, see
EP95-0313, Section 4.1.1. The more severe criterion applies.
• HAZOP drawings shall have the following features:
o The HL shall use an A1 or A0 set of PEFS attached to walls of the meeting room to
mark up nodes, lead discussion, and to mark up all the changes to PEFS resulting
from HAZOP actions up to present time. All the drawings should be displayed, if
possible in a sequence from left to right. This set gets discarded after the end of
HAZOP, after checking that all information is transferred to the A3s.
o The Master Set of HAZOP PEFS shall be of A3 size. Any change agreed to at the
HAZOP which affects the PEFS shall be marked up on the Master Set. This can be
done at the end of each day or at the end of the study, or afterwards by transferring
markups from the A0 drawings. It does not matter, as the Master Set is not used
during the HAZOP.
The Master Set is not the definitive record of the HAZOP – worksheets are the
definitive record. The purpose of the Master Set is to allow for a quick and
convenient overview of the impact of the HAZOP study on the project, without
having to read the worksheets. It shall be stamped and signed off by HL as the
HAZOP study Master Set of PEFS. It shall be attached to the HAZOP Report.
• HAZOP Report preparation shall have the following features:
o Structure and contents exactly as per Section 4.3 of EP95-0313.
o Routing:
1. Contractor PE or delegate shall prepare a draft HAZOP Report within 1 week of
the study. Contractor PE shall check it and sends it to both HL and PDO PE for
comment.
2. HL and PDO PE shall comment on the draft (no need to approve the draft). The
HL and PDO PE shall be given 1 week for comments, if no comments are
received in this time then the contractor shall assume that there are no
comments and proceed.
3. Contractor PE shall prepare the final HAZOP Report, sign it and send it to HL.
4. HL approves the HAZOP Report (or go back to 3) and sends it to PDO PE. This
shall be done within 3 weeks of completion of the HAZOP.
5. PDO PE signs it to indicate acceptance (or go back to 4).
• HAZOP Action Response Forms shall have the following features (Appendix 2):
o One action per form.
o After implementing the close out action, the Discipline Engineer signs the Action
Response Form. Any evidence of action being closed out (such as marked up
PEFS, cover of relevant calculation, or page from updated operating philosophy)
shall be attached.
o Signature by the Contractor Discipline Engineer and Contractor PE is required for all
closed Contractor Action Response Forms.
o Signature by PDO Process Engineer (with TA-2) and PDO PE is required for all
closed Action Response Forms.

Revision:2.0
o Only the PDO HAZOP worksheet template shall be used (Appendix 2). The sheet
has a header identical to the HAZOP Worksheet, as simplified cutting/pasting will
minimize content errors.
• HAZOP Action Close Out Status Report:
o This shall be a simple list of all HAZOP actions, by number, indicating their status as
Closed or Not Closed.
o The purpose of this list is to give an overview of the close out status at the end of
FED.
2.7 Design Review and Main HAZOP

• Differences
As per section 4.5.4.5 of the EP2006-5500: OPMG, HAZOP is a type of design review.
However, some confusion is often created here because there are usually 2 distinct events
that take place in front end design of a project, one design review called “Design Review”,
and another design review called “HAZOP”. Often there are arguments made that HAZOP is
not a Design Review, which is indeed true, and it seems the difference is not clear. The
practical distinction is this:
o Design Review
Here, inter-disciplinary and PDO checks are carried out to confirm progress, verify
completed work and identify problem areas. It looks at the big picture. It examines
how the BFD has been engineered and that parameters & information presented in
the BFD (or subsequent changes) have been properly applied. Any items that would
prevent a HAZOP from taking place need to be identified here and addressed
before the HAZOP. After the Design Review the deliverables shall almost be of
Approved For Design quality (except for implementing HAZOP and IPF review
actions) and signed off by the Contractor PE as suitable for HAZOP purposes.
o Main HAZOP
This event is much more formalized, and hence slower, and focused toward the
areas of hazards and operability. It looks at the fine detail and is a check that
nothing important was missed. It should be thus apparent that doing a Main HAZOP
on PEFS which are not ready is an unacceptable practice that shall not be allowed.
There shall always be a Design Review preceding a Main HAZOP. Based on the above, the
practice of having a Design Review, immediately followed by a HAZOP shall be avoided,
except for single-node HAZOPs.
• Personnel
o Every effort should be made to ensure continuity between Design Review and
HAZOP by using the same persons for both. This holds particularly true for Process
Engineers, C&A Engineers and Operators Representatives.

Revision: 2.0
Appendix 1 HAZOP Worksheet

Blue text is example
PROJECT: PROCESS DATA: PEFS: Line No.:

Musallim MSV’s and Water Injection Product Oil, water and gas MLM-1-1017-002 P39206
Manifold (Phase-1b) & Musallim Full Operating P MLM-1-1051-001 P39273
Facilities Development 2500/-/4000 kPag MLM-1-1285-001 P39040
(min/nor/max)
Operating T vessel S-3901 (oil compartm.)
Contractor Job No. : 10/70/85 C
(min/nor/max)
IECC 224570QA09
Design T & P 9500kPag, 5/90C
WBS No. : Node Description: Oil line from ILS oil collector to the GRE pipeline. Contains HAZOP Date: Node: 1 of 6
C.OM.MUS.DF.06.001 unseparated water; gas is mixed in after metering. 07 March 2006 No. of Node actions =
Total HAZOP actions =
Deviation
Causes Consequences Protection Recommendations Action
How? Can barriers fail? What protection is in Maximise closed
Parameter Guideword Is it credible? Does it matter? pre-HAZOP design? recommendations By Priority No.
who? 1,2,3 seq.
Pressure More
Less
Flow More
Less
No
Reverse
Level More
Less
No
Temperature More
Less
Phase More
Less
No
Composition More component
Less component
Impurities

Revision: 2.0
Parameter Guideword Description Recommendations Action
By Priority No.
who? 1,2,3 seq.
Operability Operator access
Maintenance access
Relief & blowdown
Emergency shutdown
Process shutdown
Draining
Venting
Isolation
Purging
Commissioning
Start-up
Materials of construc.
Sample points
Instruments
Degree of automation
Normal operation or
maintenance
Failed operation or
maintenance
Different operating
modes
Other

Revision: 2.0
Appendix 2 HAZOP Action Response Form

Blue text is example
PROJECT: PROCESS DATA: PEFS: Line No.:

Musallim MSV’s and Water Injection Product Oil, water and gas MLM-1-1017-002 P39206
Manifold (Phase-1b) & Musallim Full Operating P MLM-1-1051-001 P39273
Facilities Development 2500/-/4000 kPag MLM-1-1285-001 P39040
(min/nor/max)
Operating T vessel S-3901 (oil compartm.)
Contractor Job No. : 10/70/85 C
(min/nor/max)
IECC 224570QA09
Design T & P 9500kPag, 5/90C
WBS No. : Node Description: Oil line from ILS oil collector to the GRE pipeline. Contains HAZOP Date: Node: 1 of 6
C.OM.MUS.DF.06.001 unseparated water; gas is mixed in after metering. 07 March 2006 No. of Node actions =
Total HAZOP actions =
Deviation
Causes Consequences Protection Recommendations Action
How? Can barriers fail? What protection is in Maximise closed
Parameter Guideword Is it credible? Does it matter? pre-HAZOP design? recommendations By Priority No.
who? 1,2,3 seq.
Flow More xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WPAI 1 24
ACTION RESOLUTION
Low flow alarm is added to FIC-569. Refer the attached mark up PEFS number ZAU-1-1303-001
CONTRACTOR DISCIPLINE ENGINEER*: NAME (PRINT): SIGNATURE: DATE:

CONTRACTOR PROJECT ENGINEER*: NAME (PRINT): SIGNATURE: DATE:
PDO DISCIPLINE ENGINEER (TA-2) : NAME (PRINT): SIGNATURE: DATE:
PDO PROJECT ENGINEER : NAME (PRINT): SIGNATURE: DATE:
* REQUIRED FOR CONTRACTOR ACTION ITEMS ONLY

Revision: 2.0
Appendix 3 HAZOP Team Member FEDback Form
PROJECT:____________________________________________________________________________________
HAZOP Date:__________________________________________________________________________________
HAZOP Leader Name:___________________________________________________________________________

Please Tick Box
Very
Good Average Bad Very Bad
Good
Was number of days sufficient?
Was the HAZOP Information Pack adequate?
Did you get sufficient rest breaks?
How did you find the style HL?
Was the venue satisfactory?
Was the number of participants satisfactory?
Was the Secretary able to work without dictating and lot of

help?
What was the maximum number of persons in the room at any one time (other than for
……………persons
Introduction)?
Comments:
If you ticked Bad or Very Bad boxes, please provide more information so we can follow this up.
Thank you
Process Engineering CFDH

Revision: 2.0
Appendix 4 HAZOP Introduction Presentation

The HAZOP leader presentation can be retrieved from Introduction presentation. A Hard copy or
Soft copy can be provided by contacting UEF/2


Process Engineering HAZOP Procedure: Petroleum Development Oman L.L.C

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Process Engineering HAZOP Procedure: Petroleum Development Oman L.L.C

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

`

RESTRICTED Document ID: PR-1696

Petroleum Development Oman L.L.C.

Please familiarise yourself with the

This page was intentionally left blank

Page 2 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Version No. Date Author Scope / Remarks

ii Related Business Processes

iii Related Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF)

Code Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF) Document

Page 3 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Page 4 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Page 5 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

1.6 Fundamentals of this Procedure

1.7 Distribution/Target Audience

1.8 Review and Improvement

1.9 Deviations from this Procedure

Page 6 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

2 Roles and Responsibilities

2.1 PDO Process Engineering Discipline

2.2 PDO Project Engineer

Page 7 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

2.3 Contractor Project Engineer

2.4 HAZOP Leader

Page 8 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Page 9 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

2.6 Drawings and Templates

Page 10 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Page 11 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

2.7 Design Review and Main HAZOP

Page 12 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Appendix 1 HAZOP Worksheet

PROJECT: PROCESS DATA: PEFS: Line No.:

Page 13 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Parameter Guideword Description Recommendations Action

Page 14 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Appendix 2 HAZOP Action Response Form

PROJECT: PROCESS DATA: PEFS: Line No.:

CONTRACTOR DISCIPLINE ENGINEER*: NAME (PRINT): SIGNATURE: DATE:

Page 15 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Appendix 3 HAZOP Team Member FEDback Form

HAZOP Leader Name:___________________________________________________________________________

Was number of days sufficient?

Was the HAZOP Information Pack adequate?

Did you get sufficient rest breaks?

How did you find the style HL?

Was the venue satisfactory?

Was the number of participants satisfactory?

Was the Secretary able to work without dictating and lot of

Process Engineering CFDH

Page 16 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

Appendix 4 HAZOP Introduction Presentation

Page 17 HAZOP Procedure Printed 28/11/10

You might also like