10-Year Plan-Santa Ana (2019-2028) Final PDF

10-YEAR ECOLOGICAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1.1 PURPOSE
Being blessed with numerous scenic spots and beautiful beaches and home
to the Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA), Sta. Ana is one of the most visited
municipality in the country by both local and foreign tourists.
Fast paced urbanization, growing population and influx of tourist have greatly
contributed to the increasing generation of solid wastes. The growing tourism
industry and importation of pollutants and other hazardous substances had been a
critical issue faced by the municipality. Moreover, the lack of solid waste
management systems particularly in the households and barangays has long been
an issue that needs to be addressed.
Given the LGU’s primary role to enforce and implement the provisions of RA
9003 otherwise known as the “Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000”, the
municipality envisions for a more responsive functional system of waste reduction,
reuse, recycling, and disposal. Moreover, strong political will and support of the
people by making proper solid waste management as an integral part of their lives
are one best formula in the attainment of the municipality’s goal.
One important step to address these issues is the Formulation of the

Municipality’s 10- year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan. The 10-Year
Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan is envisioned to promote ESWM by
developing and strengthening the capabilities and awareness of the society in
managing waste and disposal; institutionalizing peoples’ participation in the
implementation of ESWM program for a progressive self-reliant, peaceful and
ecologically balanced community. The plan shall serve as the LGUs blueprint to
properly and effectively implement the Municipality’s vision towards proper solid
waste management. Guided by the programs, studies and strategies embedded in
the Plan, it is an avenue to fully comply with the provisions of RA 9003 by making
SWM a way of life for every resident in the locality.
10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 1

Municipality of Santa Ana, Cagayan
Republic Act 9003 points out and focuses proper management and disposal
of wastes. It also advocates the principle that the best ESWM program is the
reduction and minimization of solid wastes. The law also emphasizes recycling of
solid wastes in support to livelihood programs of the LGU, thus, providing additional
income to the community.
The officialdom of Santa Ana, Cagayan, Cagayan headed by Mayor Nelson P.

Robinion has taken the initiative to promptly manage the solid wastes generated by
the locality ensure its compliance to Republic Act 9003.The LGU’s ESWM program
will involve the participation of various stakeholders in the community and shall
institutionalize strong partnership between the Municipal and Barangay
governments.
1.2 APPROACH
Initially, the municipal government through an Executive Order has created

its Solid Waste Management Board whose task is to formulate the 10 year ESWM
Plan. The board is being assisted by a Technical Working Group (TWG) composed of
MPDC, Municipal Engineer, and MLGOO. The TWG is chaired by the MENRO. The
functions of the TWG in general is to serve as secretariat of the board and draft the
ESWM plan.
In the plan formulation process, the following activities were undertaken:
 Familiarization with RA 9003 and other related environmental laws;

 Undertaken training/seminar-workshop with regard to formulation
of Solid Waste Management Plan;
 Conducted Eco-Profiling and Waste Analysis and Characterization
Study (WACS);
 Conducted Situational Analysis Workshop;
 Reformulation of the LGU’s Vision, Mission and Goals;
 Conducted of Options Analysis Workshop to identify Development
Strategies;
 Conducted of Financial Planning Workshop
 Conducted series of write shops to formulate the plan.

 Consultative dialogue and meetings were also conducted to thresh
out problems that may arise during the drafting and finalization of
the plan.
The draft plan was presented to the MSWMB in a technical conference to

solicit inputs and recommendations which are essential in the enhancement of the
plan.
Different stakeholders have contributed relevant data in the formulation and

completion of the plan as indicated in the table below:
Table 1.1 Data Sources

Stakeholders Data provided
Solid Waste Management Board - Provided approaches and
strategies in the implementation
of the plan
Municipal Planning and - LGU Profile

Development Coordinator - Inventory of Equipment and
Office/MENRO SWM Staff
Municipal Engineering Office - Details in the construction of

MRF and establishment of SLF
Municipal Budget Office - Cost Estimates / Financial

Aspects
SB Office - Local Laws and Regulations on

SWM

1.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The officialdom of Santa Ana, Cagayan, headed by the Local Chief Executive
Hon. Nelson P. Robinion, recognizes with gratitude the collective efforts of the SWM
Board together with the SWM- TWG who painstakingly inhibit themselves to perform
such documentary works in order to successfully complete the SWM Plan.
The utmost support of the Sangguniang Bayan Members thru the Committee
Chairman on Environment SB Delfin A. Nepomuceno III and other members is also
highly appreciated. Their keen observations and ideal recommendations encouraged
the TWG to exert more effort in coming up with a more realistic strategies and action
plans.
We give our sincerest gratitude to For. George Canapi, Engr. Nica C. Camarao,
Ms. Elisa L. Macarubbo, Engr. Maila Adviento of the Environmental Management
Bureau (EMB) Region 2, who endlessly shared their technical expertise and time in
order to facilitate the completion of the plan. Through the series of guided
workshops, write shops and cross-visits, the team wholeheartedly transferred the
technology of planning to the Technical Working Group (TWG). Special mention of
good work is also accorded to MLGOO Rommel Aquino, for his guidance and support.
We also recognize the involvement of the sixteen (16) Barangays and the LnB,
various sectors and institutions during the preliminary activities that paved way to
the preparation of the SWM Plan.
Finally, we extend our appreciation to the general citizenry who, in one way
or another, has shown their interest imperative to the smooth preparation and
implementation of the plan.

CHAPTER 2
LGU Profile
2.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
The Municipality of Santa Ana, a second-class municipality is situated in the

northeastern part of Cagayan Valley and can be located at point 18º 27' 33" N
latitude and 122º 08' 29" longitude. It is bounded by the Pacific Ocean on the east,
Babuyan Channel on the north, China Sea on the west and the Municipality of
Gonzaga on the south.
The place has a total land area of 44,130 hectares representing about 4.9
percent of the total land area of the Province of Cagayan. It owns a shoreline distance
of 97.709 kilometers, 1,234.49 square kilometers of municipal waters, 4,490.0
square kilometers agricultural area, 28,532 hectares of forest including mangrove
with an area of 512.23 hectares open grassland, and 452 hectares built-up area
where residential, public and private institutions and facilities are erected. Road
networks and utilities measures 131.64 hectares and 2,931.36 hectares of rivers and
creeks.
The Municipality of Santa Ana is dubbed as the “Game Fishing Mecca of the
Philippines” and “Paradise of the Northeast”. It is located 70 kms. East of Aparri via
the first class Aparri-Sta. Ana corridor highway; 150 kms.North of Tuguegarao City;
the capital city of Cagayan Valley; and 632 kilometers north of Manila. The town can
be easily reached by a 45-minute plane flight from Manila via Tuguegarao Airport
and from there, it takes a 3-hour trip by road to Santa Ana via Dugo-San Vicente
National Highway.
It has a single stretch of main coastal highway covering some 17 kilometers

from Brgy. Casambalangan at the southern end to Brgy. San Vicente at the
northern end interspersed with some 14 bridges over brackish coastal waters hosting
well- preserved and vast mangrove forest. It has fairly vast low lying rice lands along
the western seacoast extending to the undulating croplands and foothills of Sierra
Madre Mountains towards the interior.
The municipality has 16 barangays. Brgy. San Vicente has the largest
population with 4,856 residents. The 2015 census of the National Statistic Office
(NSO) states that Sta. Ana has a population of 32,906 people with a growth rate of
1.61%. The household population stands at 7,821.
Port Irene is located in Sta. Ana which is becoming a major point for regional
transshipment operations. Port Irene is only a 45-minute flight from Kaohsiung, the
prime industrial and shipping center of Taiwan. Likewise, Santa Ana is also a 45-
minute air flight distance from the City of Manila. There is no wonder that most
locators of CEZA come from Taiwan and some from the Mainland China.
Figure 2.1a Location Map

Figure 2.1b Location Map
2.2 HISTORY
The place now called the Municipality of Santa Ana was formerly called
Palawig. Its first inhabitants were the Negritoes and “Hacheros” (meaning
woodcutters) under the Don Julian Astigarraga, a concessionaire from Aparri.
In 1917, a group of Ilocanos came to San Vicente to survey agricultural lands.
Seeing that the place is suitable for farming, they filed homestead applications but
were disapproved.
When Gonzaga, the mother town, was created in 1918, Pedro Agarpao and
son Felipe with some other fishermen from Minanga (still a barangay of Gonzaga
today) settled at the river banks of Palawig (from the negrito word “pasawig,” meaning
“mouth of the river”). From thence, Palawig became the popular name of the place.
In 1919, Felipe Agarpao with some settlers organized a “gimong” (meaning

association) called “Inanama.” The purpose of this organization was to acquire and
occupy lands around the place. That some Briccio Camapañero of Lapog, Ilocos Sur
together with some others from Ilocos, came to Palawig to apply for homesteads in

the sitio of Marede. Through the leadership of Federico Navarro, six homesteads were
approved for the settlers of Marede. These settlers organized another “gimong” called
“Dagupan.” The same was so called because the members came from different places.
In 1935, the groups “Inanama” and “Dagupan” fused into one called “Da
Inanama.” The members thought it wise to work for the separation of Palawig from
its surrounding barrios and become a municipality independent from Gonzaga.
Application and other necessary papers were submitted to the municipal Council of
Gonzaga, which in turn endorsed them to the department of Interior. The committee
receive an answer stating that the application for a new municipality was held in
abeyance because the population of 3,000 did not met the needed of 5,000 as
required by law. During that time, settlers hiked to Sta. Ana or they came by boats
because the national road was not yet passable. It was one of causes of the slow
increase of population.
A national road from Dugo, Camalaniugan to San Vicente (DSVR) was

constructed and later it was opened two years before the war in 1941. However, the
move to make Palawig as a municipality was not carried out because of World War
II.
In 1946, when Navarro was appointed Mayor of Gonzaga, he resumed his

project to work for the separation of Palawig from Gonzaga. As member of the
provincial board in 1947, he continued to work on the same, aided by the members
of the provincial board.
The fruit of the labor came only in 1949. The municipality was created by
virtue of Executive Order No. 289 signed by the President Elpidio Quirino on October
21, 1949. Palawig and other barrios were separated from the municipality of Gonzaga
effective January 1, 1950 and at the same time it was then called Santa Ana.
Ana was not named after a saint who triumphed over a sin. It emerged from
the figment of the minds of three great men whose family names begin with letters
which spell the word ANA of former Governor Arranz and Board Members Navarro
and Avena, who were the incumbent provincial officials during the birth of Santa
Ana.
Due to the conflict of boundary between Gonzaga and new Santa Ana, it was
only March 6, 1950 when the new municipality was inaugurated. The first
appointment Mayor was Venerando Udarbe, Sr. and Elpidio A. Tobias, Sr., Vice
Mayor. The first appointed councilors were Sulpicio Leaño, Jose Manzano, Rosendo
Medrano, and Toribio Peneyra.
The first town hall was located in the heart of Palawig, at the house of former
councilor Pantaleon Recolizado. It was only in early 1956 when the construction of
the present town hall at the new site was started through the initiative of the
appointed Municipal Officials. On June 1, 1957 the municipal government was
transferred to its present home, serving as the administrative seat of its sixteen (16)
barangays.
2.3 POPULATION
Santa Ana has a total population of 32,906 (as of 2015) with a population
density of 69 persons/km². Among the 16 Barangays that comprise the Municipality,
Barangay Casambalangan has the biggest population while Barangay Patunungan
has the largest land area. Population growth rate is 1.61% percent, where at present,
the total number of families reached 9,428 and the total number of households
summed up to 8105.
Table 2.1 Current Population
Barangay 2015 Population
URBAN
Centro 4,561
Casambalangan 5,674
San Vicente 4,856
SUB-TOTAL
15,091
RURAL
Casagan 605

DioraZinungan 1,321
Dungeg 746
Kapanikian 658
Marede 1,390
Palawig 2,677
ParadaBatu 907
Patunungan 1,444
Rapuli 2,884
Santa Clara 916
Sta. Cruz 837
Visitacion 1,359
Tangatan 2,071
SUB-TOTAL
17,815
TOTAL
32,906
Source: PSA 2015
As shown in the table found in the next page, the population in the LGU will
post an annual increase in the next ten years with population in the rural areas
posting greater increase than the urban areas. This implies generation of more solid
wastes in the rural areas than in the urban barangays. Table 2.2 shows the
population projection.
Table 2.2 Population Projection
Barangay
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
URBAN
Centro 4,862 4,940 5,020 5,101 5,183 5,266 5,351 5,437 5,525 5,614
Casambala-
6,048 6,146 6,245 6,345 6,447 6,551 6,657 6,764 6,873 6,983
ngan
San Vicente 5,176 5,260 5,344 5,430 5,518 5,607 5,697 5,789 5,882 5,977
SUB-
16,087 16,346 16,609 16,876 17,148 17,424 17,704 17,989 18,279 18,573
TOTAL
RURAL
Casagan 645 655 666 677 687 699 710 721 733 745
Diora
Zinungan 1,408 1,431 1,454 1,477 1,501 1,525 1,550 1,575 1,600 1,626
Dungeg 795 808 821 834 848 861 875 889 904 918
Kapanikian 701 713 724 736 748 760 772 784 797 810
Marede
1,482 1,506 1,530 1,554 1,579 1,605 1,631 1,657 1,684 1,711

Palawig 2,854 2,900 2,946 2,994 3,042 3,091 3,141 3,191 3,243 3,295
ParadaBatu 967 982 998 1,014 1,031 1,047 1,064 1,081 1,099 1,116
Patununga
n 1,539 1,564 1,589 1,615 1,641 1,667 1,694 1,721 1,749 1,777
Rapuli
3,074 3,124 3,174 3,225 3,277 3,330 3,383 3,438 3,493 3,550
Santa Clara
976 992 1,008 1,024 1,041 1,058 1,075 1,092 1,110 1,127
Sta. Cruz
892 907 921 936 951 966 982 998 1,014 1,030
Visitacion 1,449 1,472 1,496 1,520 1,544 1,569 1,594 1,620 1,646 1,673
Tangatan 2,208 2,243 2,279 2,316 2,353 2,391 2,430 2,469 2,509 2,549
SUB-
18,990 19,296 19,607 19,922 20,243 20,569 20,900 21,237 21,579 21,926
TOTAL
TOTAL 35,077 35,642 36,215 36,799 37,391 37,993 38,605 39,226 39,858 43,107
Urbanization or the growth in the proportion of people living in urban areas

is said to take place when there is development. When there are economic
opportunities in the area, in-migration occurs, thus, resulting in the increasing
density of population.
The level of urbanization of Santa Ana, Cagayan is relatively low. About 34%
of its total population in year 2004 was found in the urban areas composed of three
barangays. The rest of the municipality’s population resides in the rural barangays.
In most municipalities all over the country, the urban barangays, which
comprise the Poblacion, are usually the major settlement areas. In the case of the
municipality of Santa Ana, Cagayan, aside from barangay Centro, there are also
other major settlement areas located outside the Poblacion namely: Casambalangan
and San Vicente.
For commercial and business establishments, the retail business posts the
greatest number as the operation of sari-sari stores have been increasing annually
particularly in rural areas. While wholesale business and other service providers are
mostly found in the urban barangays. At present, there are eight existing junkshops
operating in the area.

2.4 ECONOMIC PROFILE/LAND USE
Socio – economic Profile
The major sources of livelihood in Sta. Ana are farming and fishing. Almost
five thousand hectares (4,490 hectares) are utilized for agriculture. Rice is the main
crop in the area which is being planted on 2,574 hectares of land. Other major crops
are corn, pineapple, watermelon, root crops, coconut, banana, vegetables and
legumes.
There are also existing pre- and post-harvest facilities such as communal
irrigation systems, small water impounding projects, shallow tube wells and open
source pumps, multi-purpose drying pavement and several agricultural equipment.
In the area of livestock, poultry is the largest with 14,732 followed by pigs with 3,001
heads. Carabaos and cows also abound in the area as they are being raised for
human consumption and for farming. Santa Ana has also bountiful marine
resources. Its municipal water with an area of 1,234.49 km2 is full of fishes and other
harvests.
There are 653 municipal and commercial fishing boats. It must be noted that
the municipality houses one municipal fish port and one provincial fishery station.
The volume of commerce and trading activities is also increasing. The number
of stores and groceries which sell various goods stands at around 175 and there are
more than 100 commercial and trade shops. There is one bank that serves the
municipality. The town’s road network is extensive as it boasts of around 2,450
kilometers of national road and around 16 kilometers of municipal road.
The existing general land use shows that forests and open grasslands cover
28,525 hectares and 7,593 hectares respectively. Agriculture on the other hand
utilizes 4,490 hectares. Furthermore, the town is fairly connected with the rest of
the country. It has postal, telegram, telephone, mobile phone, cable TV and internet
services. Power and water system are also in place. There are around 50 educational
and 10 health institutions that serve the students and residents of Sta. Ana.

Moreover, tourism is becoming a major source of income of the residents of

the town. There are twenty-eight (28) beach resorts and lodgings which cater to local
and foreign tourists. Sta. Ana has several islands and beaches which are expected
to drive the local tourism industry.
Furthermore, the expected rapid development of Sta. Ana is based on the fact
that it is the home of the Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA) which
administers the Cagayan Special Economic Zone and Freeport. The special economic
zone covers the whole Sta. Ana and the island of Fuga, Barit, and Mabbag which lie
within the territory of Aparri, Cagayan. The distance between Aparri and Sta. Ana is
around 70 kilometers. There are already 87 locators inside the economic zone, of
which 49 were already operational with actual investments of P 3.826 billion as of
end -August 2008, CEZA reported.
LAND USE
The total land area of the Municipality is 44,130 ha. subdivided into different
land uses: built-up area covering 452 hectares; agricultural area covering 4,490ha;
open grassland covering 7,593 ha. forest area covering 28,532 ha. having the highest
coverage; rivers and creeks covering 2,931 ha. and utilities/ road network covering
131.64 ha (Table 2.4)
Table 2.3 Distribution of Geological Characteristics
Geological Characteristics Area(ha) % cover
Shale/Sandstone 3,475 8
Coraline Limestone 825 2
Recent Alluvium 8,750 20
Volcanic Rock 28,641 65
Basalt-Andesite Series (Palaui Island only) 2,439 5
TOTAL 44,130 100
Source: Comprehensive and Use Plan, 2008

Table 2.4. Existing General Land Use Classification
LAND USE AREA (HAS.) % OF TOTAL
Built-up area 452.00 1.02

Agricultural 4,490.00 10.17
Open Grassland 7,593.00 17.21
Forest Area 28,532.00 64.65
Rivers and Creeks 2,931.36 6.64
Utilities/Road Network 131.64 0.31
TOTAL 44,130.00 100 %

Source: CLUP 2008
At the urban area where the main seat of commerce for the municipality is
located, land use is further classified as presented in the table below:
Table 2.5 Urban Land Use Classification
URBAN LAND USES AREA (HA.) PERCENTAGE (%)

Residential 21.39 10.20
Commercial 1.68 0.80
Industrial 0.23 0.11
Institutional 14.71 7.00
Park & Open Space 102.78 49.00
Facilities 4.69 2.20
Agricultural 11.37 5.40
Roads/Streets 53.15 25.30
TOTAL 210 100%
Source: CLUP 2008

Figure 2.1 Existing Urban Land Use Map
Functional Classification of Road Network
For purposes of prioritizing maintenance and development of road network,

the municipality’s circulatory system is categorized into two functional hierarchies:
arterial and service roads. The major arterial road of the municipality is the National
Highway. Aside from linking the barangays, it also serves as the main thoroughfare
connecting Santa Ana, Cagayan to Tuguegarao City, Santiago City and Manila.
Connector and service roads are those, which branch out from the arterial roads in
the area. Aside from serving as the main access of population, these roads are being
utilized as farm-to-market roads by the farmers.

Major Transportation Routes and Facilities
The transportation routes and nodes attend to the need of commuters plying
the major routes such as regular mini-buses plying Santa Ana to Tuguegarao; and
Santa Ana to Vigan and vice-versa almost every hour frequency. There are also bigger
aircon buses, which ply the Santa Ana-Tugugegarao-Manila route. These include
GMW, Florida Liner. Vans and passenger jeeps are also available in a regular basis.
2.5 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
A. Land Area
Sta. Ana has a total land area of 44,130 hectares covering 40% of the total
9,002.7 sq.km of the provincial area. The total coastline of the municipality is
97.70907 kilometers stretching from Matara Point of Brgy. Casambalangan to
Maloncon Island of Brgy. Patunungan and it covers 1,234.49 km2 of municipal water.
The eastern portion is generally characterized by having rugged land and seascapes.
(Table 2.6)
TABLE NO. 2.6
LAND AREA OF THE BARANGAYS OF SANTA ANA
BARANGAY LAND AREA
Casagan 2,300
Casambalangan 5,100
Centro 210
Diora-Zinungan 4,300
Dungeg 2,400
Palawig 280
Patunungan 10,600
Rapuli 2,350
Sta.Cruz 650
San Vicente 1,261
Palaui Island 2,439
Tangatan 1,700
SUB TOTAL 33,590
NON- COASTAL:

Kapanikian 1,500
Marede 1,750
Parada-Batu 850
Sta. Clara 5,500
Visitacion 940
SUB TOTAL 10,540
GRAND TOTAL 44,130 HAS
Source: CLUP 2008* Coastal waters facing the Philippine Sea
Among the coastal barangays mentioned, Patunungan has the largest land
area covering 10,600 hectares while San Vicente has the longest and has two
coastlines, the coastline surrounding Palaui Island of San Vicente within the
mainland Luzon.
B. Topography and Elevation
The general topographic characteristic of the municipality of Sta. Ana ranges

from level to nearly level and rolling to steeply sloping due to the presence of the
Sierra Madre mountain range found along the eastern portion of the municipality.
The highest elevation of the profile area ranges from 5 to 1,000 meters above sea
level. A considerable portion is flat as exhibited by the shores areas and the flood
plains. It is in these areas that agricultural production is greatest.
1. Slope
Seventy-five percent of the total land area of the municipality has greater than
18% slope and the rest of the area ranges from 0% - 18%. This implies that about
one-fourth (11,032 has.) of the total land area of the municipality can be utilized for
intensive agricultural and urban development. ( See table 2.7)

Table 2.7 Slope Classification
Slope (%) Land Area (Ha.) Percentage (%) Description

0-3 7,536 17.08 Level to nearly level
3-8 469 1.06 Gently sloping to
undulating
8-18 3,172 7.19 Undulating to rolling
18-30 6,190 14.03 Rolling to moderately
steep
>50 11,511 26.08 Strongly hilly
mountainous
44,130 100
Source : BSWM
Figure 2.2 Slope Map

Figure 2.3 Elevation Map
Table 2.8
ELEVATION CATEGORIES
Municipality of Sta. Ana (In hectares)
Elevation Sta. Ana Palaui Total Percentage
< 100 22,441 1,664 24,105 55%
100-300 12,075 775 12,850 29%
301-500 5,925 0 5,925 13%
501-1000 1,250 0 1,250 3%
TOTAL 41,691 2,439 44,130 100%
Source: Bureau of Soils and Water Management

Department of Agriculture

2. Flood-prone areas
The flood-prone area of Sta. Ana is barangay Parada - Batu which is located
on the lower stream of Palawig River. About 50 hectares of these flood- prone areas
are being utilized as production site for rice, corn, watermelon and vegetable. For
this reason, the establishment of settlements in this area is not recommended or
should be restrained. (Figure 2.2)
Erosion- prone areas of Sta. Ana are those within denuded areas. These are
mostly located along the upper streams of Palawig and Casambalangan Rivers.
Slopes that are greater than 50% are also susceptible to erosion. (See figure 2.4)
Figure 2.4 Erosion Map

TABLE 2.9
AREA DISTRIBUTION BY LEVEL OF EROSION
Municipality of Sta. Ana
Level of Erosion Area (In hectares)
EO 10,143
E1 16,500
E2 17,037
E3 450
TOTAL 44,130

C. Hydrology
1. Surface and Ground Water

The drainage map shows that several rivers, brooks and creeks traverse the
area, providing abundant supply of water for domestic use and irrigation purposes.
There are five major river in systems that pass through the town of Sta. Ana, namely:
1) Casambalangan River, 2) Palawig River, 3) Tangatan River, 4) Diora- Zinungan River
and 5) Apulagan River. Apulagan River lies on the southern part of barangay
Patunungan draining down to the Philippine Sea. (Figure 2.5)
The ground water resource of Sta. Ana is being tapped for human
consumption. While the abundant surface is being utilized through diversion dams
and small water impounding for agricultural purposes

Figure 2.5 Drainage Map
2.
Marine and Coastal Water

The Sta. Ana area lies along two (2) major bodies of water namely: The
Philippine sea and the Babuyan Channel where Kuroshio current (Black current)
traverses towards north up to Taiwan and Japan. Said current supplies or modify
the environment bringing nutrient rich from the equatorial zone. The water
surrounding the area serves as one of the most valuable fishing grounds in the
region. In addition, local and foreign anglers of the Philippine Game Fishing
Federation (PGFF) conduct annual fishing tournaments in the area. Its shoreline has
a length of 97.709 km. starting from Matara Point of Barangay Casambalangan along
the Babuyan Channel up to Maloncon Island of Barangay Patunungan in the
Philippine Sea side. On the northeastern part of the municipality covers a large tract
of coral reefs (930 Ha.) with long stretch of white beaches (203Ha.) on its shoreline.
Seagrass beds supporting the aquatic environment have an approximate area of
(359.50Ha.) Beach Mangrove (512.25 Ha.) and Seaweeds (2.40Ha.
Having good to excellent coral reefs, it is an ideal breeding ground for various
species of marine life like snappers, groupers, sea basses among others. The reef in
Palaui Island is also an ideal for snorkeling, a highly potential area of eco-tourism
destination that would generate income for the municipality.
Furthermore, the marine area of the municipality is a migratory route of
skipjack tunas and other tuna species (NSAP 2004). Due to its water richness, the
municipality of Sta. Ana is a favorite for the Annual Philippine Game Fishing
Tournament attended by local and international anglers from April to June.
D. Soil Type and Characteristics

Based on the survey of Sta. Ana revealed by the Bureau of Soil and Water
Management (BSWM), there are eight soil textures that can be found in the area.
These are Hydrosol, San Manuelsilt loam, Alaminous loam, Beach sand, Alaminous
clay loam, Buguey loamy sand, Quingua silt loam and undifferentiated mountain soil.
The Characteristic of the Different Soil Textures are as follows:

• Hydrosol- is alluvial deposit along seacoast especially along mouth of rivers.
Only certain types of vegetation grow in the area. Generally, it is covered by
mangrove trees.
• San Manuel Silt Loam- is recent alluvial deposits of mixed mineralogy. They
are found on weakly acetified alluvium on flood plain areas of medium
terraces subject to seasonal river flooding. The soil is moderately deep, level
to nearly level and well drained fine loamy soils. Cultivated areas are mainly
utilized for diversified crops while uncultivated portions are vegetated with
talahib used for grazing animals.
• Beach Sand- is strictly not considered soil as the sand is constantly being
stirred and distributed by the sea tides or current and therefore, profile
development can take place. This miscellaneous land type consists of very
loose particles and only certain types of plants grow on it.
• Alaminous Loam- soils of the alaminous loam are the residual soils derived
from the weathering of basalts and andesites. The relief is rolling hilly with
some primary and secondary forests while the rolling and level areas under
the parang type of vegetation.
• Alaminous Clay Loam- the surface soil is light brown to reddish brown clay
loam, loose and friable, slightly sticky when wet, crumble easily upon drying,
granular in structure high organic matter content, as coarse skeleton.
Lowland rice is planted on small level areas. The rice variety commonly
planted is white flint. Coffee, cacao and coconut are grown on the cultivated
rolling areas.
• Mountain Soils (undifferentiated)- this miscellaneous land type consist of

steep stones and in general, the mountains have high elevations. These
mountains are mainly of volcanic origin and consist of basaltic diuretic rocks
with gabbros and peridotites and other coarse grained basic rocks.
• Quingua Silt Loam- usually found on river banks and suited for upland
farming.
• Buguey Loamy Sand- This belongs to soil group, Buguey Series which is
formed from recent coastal deposits. The relief is nearly level to slightly
undulating, moderately deep and moderately well-drained fine loamy soils.
These are adapted to cultivation of corn, cassava of corn, cassava and camote.
Table 2.8. Area covered by each soil type found in Sta. Ana, Cagayan
Soil Classification Hectares Percent (%)

1. Hydrosol 525 1.19
2. Alaminous Loam 2,439 5.53
3. Beach Sand 1,300 2.95
4.San Miguel Silt Loam 370 0.84
5.Buguey Loamy Sand 3,405 7.72
6.Quingua Silt Loam 730 1.65
7.Alaminous Clay Loam 2,350 5.32
8.Mountainous Soil,
Undifferentiated 33,011 74.80
Total 44,130 100

Figure 2.6 Soil Map
E. Geological Characteristics
The municipality of Sta. Ana is predominantly composed of volcanic rocks at

65% of its total land area. Basalt-andesite series can be found only in Palaui Island.
Other geological characteristics that can be found in the municipality are
shale/sandstone. coralline limestone and recent alluvium. Table 2.7 presents the
area covered by each geological characteristic.

Figure 2.7 Geological Map
Table 2.9
AREA DISTRIBUTION OF GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
by Area, Municipality of Sta. Ana
Geological Percentage
Characteristics Sta. Ana Palaui Total (%)
Shale/Sand 3,475 0 3,475 8

stone
825 0 825 2
Coral limestone
8,750 0 8,750 20
Recent
Alluvium 28,641 0 28,641 65
Volcanic Rock 0 2,439 2,439 5
Basalt-Andesite 41,691 2,439 44,130 100

Series
TOTAL

Figure 2.8 Existing General Land Use Map
F. Climatologically Profile
1. Climate
The climate of Santa Ana falls under the fourth type of climate. Such type is
characterized by having even distribution of rainfall throughout the year. The dry
season begins in the month of March and ends late July. The hottest periods are
the months of April, May and June. Generally, the months of June, July and August
are moderate with occasional rains. The rest of the year is characterized by heavy
downpours. This is characterized as not having very pronounced seasons, relatively
dry from November to April and wet during the rest of the year.

2. Rainfall, Temperature, Humidity and Typhoon Occurrences
Rainfall varies from 16.00 mm to 44.00 mm in the mountainous areas, with

an annual average of 26.00 mm. Temperature ranges from a low of 17 degrees
Celsius during the period of November to February, to a high of 35 degrees Celsius
during the months of April, May and June, with May being the warmest month and
January as the coldest.
A high relative humidity prevails in the area ranging from 70% to 90% with
an annual mean of 76%. Furthermore, tropical storms frequently visit the area
averaging about 12 typhoons per year. Occurrence of such is usually between the
months of May and November. The occurrence of flood is also within these typhoon
months. Drought is usually experienced during the dry months of April, May and
June.
G. Present Land Use
For Santa Ana has approximately 17% or 7,502 hectares of its land area is being
utilized as cultivation and alienable and disposable (A&D) area. The data presented
above shows that the areas covered are predominantly classified as forestlands and
a significant portion (27.37%) is considered as protected areas. This includes Palaui
Island with 2,439 hectares, Santa Ana with 10,971 hectares of old growth forest
including 598 hectares of mossy forest and 220 hectares of mangrove forest. The
total protected area that Santa Ana covers is estimated at 14,632.31 hectares
including the 568 hectares of the Integrated Social Forestry Program of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
H. Physical Constraints
The major physical constraints for the full development includes the following:
(1) 12,130 hectares of old growth forest; (2) 512.25 hectares of mangroves; (3) 598
hectares of mossy forests; and (4) the entire island of Palaui which has been declared
as a marine reserve.

The other constraints that could affect the development of the area is the
presence of 11,511 hectares of the land having slopes greater than 50%. The
development of these areas will require special considerations and high investments.
The areas with severe erosion, although insignificant should also be taken into
account in the development.
The flatlands (areas with slope from 0% -3%) with an area estimated at 7,356
hectares are easily flooded during heavy downpours that occur in the Sta. Ana site.
Natural hazards are also present in area, which could affect the Sta. Ana. Two
dormant volcanoes (Mt. Didicas – a submarine volcano is located near the area,
which is approximately 55 kms. WNW of Sta. Ana.

CHAPTER 3
Current Solid Waste Management Condition
3.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
The implementation of different solid waste management services in the

municipality of Santa Ana, Cagayan are managed by the local government through
the office of the designated Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Officer
(MENRO) under the direct supervision of the Local Chief Executive (LCE). The
MENRO is being assisted by the Technical Working Group composed of different LGU
departments whose task is to coordinate, collaborate and implement the different
aspects of Solid Waste Management.
The concerned offices assigned to assist the MENRO in the implementation of
Solid Waste Management are the following:
Table 3.1 Roles and Responsibilities

Office Roles & Responsibilities
1.Municipal Mayor Over all overseer on the full
implementation of Solid Waste
Management of the Municipality in
relation to RA 9003
2.Municipal Planning and The coordinating body for the conduct of SWM
Development Office projects, programs and any relative
development activity.
Assist in the formulation of the plans and

programs on ESWM.
Gather data, convene and plan updates on

ESWM activities and programs.
3.Municipal Health Office Enforce sanitation rules and regulations in
relation to ESWM programs and projects
4.Municipal Budget Allocate funds for the conduct of programs and
Office projects intended for ESWM
5.Municipal Treasurer’s Disburse funds necessary for the
Office implementation of ESWM programs and
projects

6.Municipal Engineering Preparation of plans and designs of Sanitary
Office Land Fill and other ESWM facilities & utilities.
Deploy heavy equipment and other utility

vehicles to facilitate the implementation of the
ESWM Plan.
7.Municipal Agriculture
Office
8.MLGOO Provide technical assistance in the preparation
and implementation of the over-all ESWM
programs and projects.
9. Members of Enacts ordinances/resolutions for the
Sanggunian Bayan approval of the Ecological Management
Plan.
Enacts necessary legislative measures to

ensure successful implementation of ESWM
programs.
Institutionalize the organization of the

ESWM Board.
10.Department of Lead in the establishment of Ecology Learning
Education Centers, demonstration centers or show
windows for the concept of ESWM
Integration of ESWM in the school curriculum
Assists in the IEC programs of ESWM
3.2 INVENTORY OF EQUIPMENTS AND STAFF
The LGU has adequate equipment used in Solid Waste Management. The table
below presents the existing LGU equipment that are utilized in the SWM program:
Table 3.2 Existing Equipment of the Municipality
Equipment No. of Unit Model Capacity Condition
Six-wheeler dump truck 2 Isuzu 6 cubic Good
Forward meter
Six wheeler dump truck 1 Mercedez 6 cubic Good
Benz meter
Loader 1 Good
Wheeled tractor 1 Holland 90 hp Good
Mini-dump truck 1 Good
Multi-cab 1 Good

Bulldozer 1 Good
Backhoe 1 Good
Garbage truck with 2 6 cubic & Good
compactor 4 cubic
meter
Aside from the MENRO, there are adequate personnel that cater to SWM
concerns. The table below provides a list of the LGU officials and employees who are
directly in-charge in the implementation of ESWM programs:
Table 3.3 LGU Functionaries/Employees directly involve in ESWM programs

Position/Office Item Number
Market Supervisor Permanent 1
Municipal Engineer Permanent 1
Sanitary Inspector (MHO) Permanent 1
Grader Operator (MEO) Job order 1
Dump Truck Driver (MEO) Job Order 2
Collector Job Order 6
MPDC/MENRO_Des Permanent 1
SWM in Charge Permanent 1
Garbage Truck Driver Job Order 2
Payloader Operator Permanent 1
TOTAL 17
Capability building interventions in the form of Trainings or actual immersion

through study tours are important skills-enhancer and morale-booster for employees
directly involved in program implementation. Below is a list of trainings attended by
the MSWMB and MENRO staff that helped in developing their capacities in delivering
a sound ESWM program.
Table 3.3 List of Trainings attended
Title of Training Date and Venue
Orientation/ Workshop Cum Finalization of 10- January,2019
Year Solid Waste Management Plan Tuguegarao City

Orientation/ Workshop Cum Finalization of 10- April 15-17,2019
Year Solid Waste Management Plan Tuguegarao City
Training Workshop on Waste Analysis and Jan 30, 2015
Characterization Study (WACS) Tuguegarao City
Orientation and Action Planning on the Sept. 9, 2014
Formulation of 10 Year ESWM Plan Tuguegarao City
Ecological Solid Waste Management Convention May 7-9, 2014
on the Updating of 10 year ESWM Plan Cebu City
Study tours to research on best practices of other LGUs that are applicable and
replicable in the municipality were likewise undertaken by the MSWMB and its TWG.
They are enumerated in the table below:
Table 3.4 List of models LGUs Visited for Educational Research

Model LGUs Visited Best Practices for Replication
Gonzaga, Cagayan  Eco-Center (Processing of Biodegradable
wastes)
- Adequate facilities
- Technically competent manpower
- Good organizational structure
 Sanitary Landfill
- The design is very affordable and feasible
- Residual waste contained/packed in
plastic/sack
- Zero scavengers
- There were personnel who are
concentrated/implementer of ESWM
program
- Facilities and equipment are available at all
times
- Site is accessible
 Public Market/Elementary Public School

- Accommodation of group tour on LGU-
Gonzaga Environmental Management
Program
- Regular collection of segregated solid waste
from business establishments and
residential houses.
 Institution
- Well-trained ESWM implementers
- Team work with PTCA and barangay
officials and the pupils as well
- ESWM is integrated in all learning areas
- Very effective IEC strategy
Figure 3.1 EXISTING ESWM ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
MUNICIPAL MAYOR
MENRO
COLLECTION UNIT REPAIR AND MRF PERMITS & LICENSING

MAINTENANCE MANAGER DIVISION
The figure above shows the current organizational structure of the LGU
personnel directly involved in implementing ESWM programs of the LGU. The
designated MENRO works along with the above-cited units to ensure a systematic
and effective implementation of SWM.
3.3 SOURCE REDUCTION AND SEGREGATION AT SOURCE
Segregation at source was not yet fully practiced in the municipality. However,
biodegradable materials collected from waste generators were being processed and
converted into fertilizers which are distributed to farmers. There are some residential
households who undertake composting of bio-degradable waste through compost

pits located in their backyards. The municipality also ban the use of plastic bags
in public markets. Vendors are required to use paper bags in packing their products
as well as “bayongs” for buyers.
Recyclable materials are collected and sold to itinerant buyers and junkshops.
3.4 COLLECTION
At present, the collection of solid waste in the municipality is solely done by
the MLGU focused only on 8 highway barangays, public market and other public
places maintained by the LGU. National government offices and private institutions
practice their own method and schemes in collecting and disposing their generated
waste. Likewise, residential households do the same manner relative to collection
and disposal of their wastes.
The table below presents waste collection scheme in the municipality:
Table 3-5. Waste Collection Scheme
Collection Area Schedule of Waste Equipment Personnel

Collection Classification Used Involved
Public Market Biodegradable Garbage MENRO Staff
(All Section) Daily Compactor
Non- Garbage MENRO Staff
Biodegradable Compactor
Brgy. Tangatan, Monday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Sta. Cruz and Compactor
Nangaramoan
Beach
San Vicente Tuesday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Compactor
Centro Wednesday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Compactor
Palawig Thursday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Compactor
Casambalangan, Friday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Rapuli, DiorA Compactor
Zinungan

Beach Resorts Saturday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Compactor
Samuk samuk, Sunday Mixed Waste Garbage MENRO Staff
Centro Compactor
Table 3-6. Barangays Not Included in the Waste Collection

Barangay Population 2015
Casagan 605
Dungeg 746
Kapanikian 658
Marede 1,390
Parada Batu 907
Patunungan 1,444
Santa Clara 916
Visitacion 1,359
TOTAL 8,025
Eight (8) barangays of Santa Ana, Cagayan are not yet covered by the
Municipal Collection Team due to budgetary constraints and distance to national
highways. However, residential households practice traditional composting of
biodegradable wastes and segregate recyclable to be sold to itinerant buyers and
junkshops. Residuals wastes are buried within their backyard.
3.5 TRANSFER
Since the LGU practices the “collect and dump” method of disposing waste,
there are no transfer stations established.
3.6 PROCESSING FACILITIES
The processing of biodegradable waste into compost materials are

conventionally done in every household. The technology of composting is transferred
to farmers specially on the processing of agricultural waste into useful organic
fertilizers for the production of crops in their farmlands and residential gardens.

There are material recovery facilities to accommodate compostable materials at

present. Figure 3.1 shows the Material Recovery Facility(MRF).
Figure 3.1 Material Recover Facility(MRF)
3.7 FINAL DISPOSAL
As previously stated, the present service area of the disposal facility is focused
in the public market, eight (8) highway barangays and local government institutions.
However, it is also intended to cover all barangays of the municipality in the near
future. The municipality uses Residual Containment Area (RCA) as the Final
Disposal pending the completion of the proposed Sanitary Landfill. There are no
existing scavengers around the area because they are strictly prohibited from
entering the site.
3.8 SPECIAL WASTE
Special wastes are being disposed and stored in properly covered plastic
container. Special wastes on agricultural products are being managed by the
concerned user and strictly follow the instructional label for both usage and disposal.
3.8.1 Health Care Waste
There are three (3) main generators of health care waste in the municipality.
These are the infirmary hospital, private hospital and the main rural health unit.
However, the three (3) medical establishments of the municipal government have
their respective disposal and treatment facility for toxic and hazardous waste. This
is done through proper placement under separate containers which are stored safely
with dissolving agents to establish or normalize its hazardous effect before finally
transporting it to the disposal area.
Based on the survey and waste study of the municipality, 228.33 kilos per
day of toxic and hazardous wastes are being generated in the locality. These special
wastes consist both health care and domestic waste generated at source like

syringes, vials, surgical items from the hospital and RHU, and batteries, bulbs,
medical and agricultural supply containers, and cosmetics spray from households.
3.9 MARKETS FOR RECYCLABLES
There are stationed junk shops in the municipality and there are number of
transient scrap vendors from nearby municipalities radiating in the locality to buy
valuable recyclable wastes like plastic, paper, tin, glasses, steel, aluminum and
empty bottles. The table below presents types and quantities of materials accepted
by these mobile junkshops.
Table 3-7. List of Recyclable Materials Bought by Junkshops
Recyclable Materials Quantity Buying Selling

Price Price
Dry Papers/Newspapers 1 Kg 2.00 5.00
Dry Cardboards/Cartons 1 Kg 2.00 5.00
Plastic Container 1 Kg 15.00 20.00
Plastic Materials 1 Kg 15.00 20.00
Plastic Water Bottles 1 Kg 15.00 20.00
Plastic Bottle Cap 1 Kg 15.00 20.00
Tin Cans and Covers 1 Kg 12.00 15.00
Aluminum Cans 1 Kg 20.00 25.00
GSM 4x4 Bottles 1 Pc 1.25 2.00
Long Neck Emperador Bottles 1 Pc 1.00 1.75
GSM (Bilog) Bottles 1 Pc .70 1.00
TansoDilaw 1 Kg 80.00 100.00
Tanso Pula 1 Kg 175.00 180.00
1 SM Battery 1 Piece 180.00 200.00
2 D Battery 1 Piece 600.00 650.00
4 D Battery 1 Piece 650.00 700.00

For the re-manufacturing of recycled materials, there are no existing

industries in the locality that use or could make use of recycled materials. Processing
of these type of materials is done in most academic institutions as student projects
which is integrated in school curriculum. Members of the Rural Improvement Club
(RIC) also have activities and programs which promote and maximize the use of
recyclable materials.
3.10 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN
Periodic Information and Education Campaign through the conduct of public

forum, symposium on the different barangays, public and private schools, groups of
association and non-government organizations were undertaken to involve them as
active partners in the implementation of the different programs and activities of
SWM.
3.11 COST AND REVENUES
In pursuance with the provisions of the Local Government Code of 1991 (RA
No.7160), the LGU has regularly allocated in its Annual Budget for the last three (3)
years an amount necessary for the implementation of the different programs
concerning environmental concerns particularly on solid waste management.
The implementation of Solid waste management programs has been a priority

concern of the LGU. As provided in the table below, the LGU has consistently
allocated funds for SWM programs particularly on the establishment of SLF,
purchase of SWM equipment and environmental protection concerns.
The municipality has incurred revenues for the past years. Garbage collection
fees and related dues were collected by the LGU. SWM fees is being imposed starting
2015 as provided in the SWM Ordinance and upon implementation of the plan.
Funds allocated for SWM were used in the conduct of IEC particularly in the
reproduction of materials and advocacy campaigns to public places and barangays.
Funds were also used in the purchase of SWM equipment and facilities.
A comparison of annual budget and actual expenses for 3 years is shown below

Table 3.7 Comparison of Annual Budget and Actual Expenses for 3 Years
Year Annual Budget Allocation Actual

Over / Under
for SWM Expenditures
2016 118,521,963.00 2,490,000.00 2,931,294.12 -441,294.12
2017 134,597,770.00 2,044,450.00 1,640,993.51 403,456.49
2018 156,290,666.00 2,115,000.00 1,827,851.60 287,148.4
TOTAL 6,649,450.00 6,400,139.23 249,310.77
3.12 KEY ISSUES
As a result of the workshop conducted during the planning exercises, the

following issues and concerns were noted for consideration and action of the present
administration:
1. Lack of manpower and technical capability in implementing ESWM

Programs;
2. Mixed-up collection of generated waste and unsorted wastes due to
lack of source segregation practices;
3. Non-practice or lack of programs intended for recyclable wastes;
4. Improper disposal of waste (littering);
5. Lack of awareness of the general populace on proper segregation;
6. Poor enforcement of environmental laws and issuances;
7. Absence of linkages and networking with external groups or entities;
and
8. Residents set out garbage not on the specified time or
schedule.
9. No budget allocation for ESWM programs in the Barangay level.
10. Non- existence or revenue generating measures on ESWM.

CHAPTER 4
Waste Characteristics
The Municipal Ecological Solid Waste Management (ESWM) Profile was

prepared using data and information from the 4-day Waste Analysis and
Characterization Study (WACS) and a structured survey to respondents that were
identified using Slovin’s Formula. The 4-day WACS is a process of gathering ESWM
data for 4 consecutive days from the following waste sources: (1) Residential or
households; (2) Food establishment; (3) General stores; (4) Industries; (5) Recreation
centers; (6) Institution; (7) Public market; (8) Service centers; (9) Special waste
generators and; (10) Slaughter house. The WACS was conducted by the municipality
on November 9-12, 2018.
Statistical treatment and analysis of the data gathered during WACS was
undertaken to come up with the needed data and information for the plan.
4.1 DISPOSED WASTE
Disposed waste represents the quantity of waste which is thrown or disposed

by waste generators to the Municipal Collection Team. Most of the disposed waste of
the municipality are biodegradable waste which comprises 59.91% followed by
recyclable waste at 19.25%, residual waste at 13.02%, residual with potential at 5.58%,
special waste at 2.24%, the table below shows the quantity of waste disposed in
kilograms per day:
Table 4.1 Quantity of Waste Disposed in Kilograms per Day
Composition of waste Disposed kg/day

% of
Source/sector Kg/day
Residual Residual Total
Biodegra Recycla Specia
with for
dable ble l
potential Disposal
Household 2402.1 1415.8 508.6 1186.8 105.6 5619.0 55.17%
Food
37.0 16.5 1.3 3.0 9.0 66.8 0.66%
Establishment

General Stores 194.0 86.5 14.2 33.1 22.4 350.2 3.44%
Industrial 9.9 4.4 0.1 0.3 3.1 17.8 0.17%
Recreation 9.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 10.8 0.11%
Institution 64.6 28.8 3.8 8.8 10.7 116.7 1.15%
Public Market 3327.2 382.7 37.6 87.7 64.7 3899.9 38.29%
Service Center 47.3 21.1 2.1 4.9 10.0 85.4 0.84%
Special Waste
7.9 3.5 0.3 0.6 2.0 14.3 0.14%
Generators
Slaughter
2.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 4.0 0.04%
House
Total 6101.8 1960.9 568.1 1325.6 228.3 10184.7 100.00%
% of Total 59.91% 19.25% 5.58% 13.02% 2.24% 100% 55.17%
Public market and residential are the major generators of biodegradable

wastes. Clearly indicate that the LGU should focus on the strategies how to reduce
waste generation and increase its waste diversion.
4.2 DIVERTED WASTE
Diverted waste is the quantity of waste currently re-used, recycled, sold to

junkshops and composted or processed based on existing information. To gather
data on the estimated quantity or volume of waste currently diverted, survey
questionnaires were floated to various respondents from all waste sources. The table
below presents the result of the survey:

Table 4.2 Quantity of Waste Diverted in Kilograms per Day
Diverted Waste kg/day

Total
Source Residual Percentage
kg/day
Biodegradable Recyclable with
Potential
Household 1,086.75 349.24 101.22 1537.2 55.17%
Food
13.00 4.18 1.21 18.3 0.66%
Establishment
General Stores 67.76 21.78 6.31 95.8 3.44%
Industrial 3.35 1.08 0.31 4.9 0.17%
Recreation 2.17 0.70 0.20 3.0 0.11%
Institution 22.65 7.28 2.11 31.9 1.14%
Public Market 754.24 242.39 70.25 1066.9 38.29%
Service Center 16.55 5.32 1.54 23.4 0.84%
Special Waste
2.76 0.89 0.26 3.9 0.14%
Generators
Slaughter
0.79 0.25 0.07 1.1 0.04%
House
TOTAL 1,969.81 633.03 183.46 2,786.31 100.00%
Percentage 1,086.75 22.72% 6.58% 100.00% 100.00%
Result of the survey shows that the most common waste diversion strategy is
backyard composting. Quantity of wastes being composted, however, was not
accurately estimated by the respondents. Hence, they were no longer included in
the results. Recyclable materials pegged at 633.03 kilograms included bottles,
plastic containers, tin cans and other materials sold to junkshops and itinerant
buyers.
4.3 GENERATED WASTE
Generated waste is defined as the total quantity or volume of waste disposed

+ (diverted) based on the WACS results and tabulated survey questionnaire results.
The table below gives a detailed presentation on the waste generated in the
municipality:

Table 4.3 Waste Generation in Kilograms per Day

Composition of waste generated kg/day
Residu Special % of
Source/sector Residual Kg/day
Biodegra Recycla al for Total
with
dable ble Dispos
potential
al
Household 3488.9 1765.0 609.8 1186.8 105.6 7156.2 55.17%
Food
50.0 20.7 2.5 3.0 9.0 85.1 0.66%
Establishment
General
261.8 108.2 20.5 33.1 22.4 446.1 3.44%
Stores
Industrial 13.2 5.5 0.4 0.3 3.1 22.5 0.17%
Recreation 11.6 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 13.9 0.11%
Institution 87.3 36.1 5.9 8.8 10.7 148.7 1.15%
Public Market 4081.5 625.1 107.8 87.7 64.7 4966.8 38.29%
Service Center 63.8 26.4 3.6 4.9 10.0 108.8 0.84%
Special Waste
10.7 4.4 0.6 0.6 2.0 18.2 0.14%
Generators
Slaughter
3.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.8 5.1 0.04%
House
Total 8071.78 2594.01 568.10 1325.6 228.33 12971.41 100.00%
The above shows that the total waste generation in the municipality is
approximately 12,971.04 kilograms per day comprising of 8071.78 kilograms
biodegradable, 2594.01 kilograms recyclable, 568.10 kilograms residual with
potential, 1325.160 kilograms residual for disposal and 228.33 kilograms special.
The Per Capita Waste Generation (PCG) of the municipality is 0.30 kg/ person/ day.
Figure 4.1 Percentage composition of waste by Source

0.84% 0.14%
0.04% Household
Food Establishment
General Stores
38.29% Industrial
Recreation
55.17% Institution
Public Market
Service Center
1.15%
Special Waste Generators
0.11%
0.17% 3.44% Slaughter House
0.66%

The above figure shows that bulk of the waste generated come from
households at approximately 55.17% followed by public market at 38.29%. The data
implies that solid waste management programs to be implemented should focus on
the advocacy for waste reduction from these two (2) major sources.
Figure 4.2 Percentage composition of waste by Classification

2.24%
13.02%
Biodegradable
5.58%
Recyclable
Residual with potential
Residual for disposal

19.25% 59.91%
Special
From the figure above, we can conclude that majority of waste generated are
biodegradable 59.91%. This implies that solid waste management strategy should
focus on the processing of biodegradable wastes. The 19.25% recyclable waste
generated shall be the basis in coming up with the design for the volume capacity of
the Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs) to be constructed while the quantity of
residual wastes (18.59%) shall be the basis in coming up with the appropriate
facilities to be established in the LGU.
4.4 PROJECTED WASTE GENERATION
The projected waste generation in the entire municipality is computed by

multiplying the generated waste to the projected population. The table below
presents the projected waste generation from 2019 to 2028 in tons per year.

Table 4.4 Projection of Quantity of waste generated base on population

projection
YEAR POPUL Composition of waste generated Total

A- Kg/day
TION
Biodegra- Recycla- Residual Residu Special
dable ble with al for
Potential Disposa
l
2019 35,077 6,200.0 1,992.5 1,924.2 232.0 232.01 10,348.8
2020 35,642 6,299.9 2,024.6 1,955.2 235.7 235.75 10,515.5
2021 36,215 6,401.2 2,057.1 1,986.6 239.5 239.54 10,684.5
2022 36,799 6,504.4 2,090.3 2,018.7 243.4 243.40 10,856.8
2023 37,391 6,609.1 2,123.9 2,051.2 247.3 247.32 11,031.5
2024 37,993 6,715.5 2,158.1 2,084.2 251.3 251.30 11,209.1
2025 38,605 6,823.6 2,192.9 2,117.7 255.3 255.35 11,389.6
2026 39,226 6,933.4 2,228.2 2,151.8 259.5 259.45 11,572.8
2027 39,858 7,045.1 2,264.1 2,186.5 263.6 263.63 11,759.3
2028 43,107 7,619.4 2,448.6 2,364.7 285.1 285.12 12,717.9

CUMULA
TI-VE 67,151.7 21,580.4 20,840.8 2,512.9 2512.87 112,085.7
TOTAL
The above table shows the cumulative volume of wastes generated for ten (10)
years. This is the basis of coming up with appropriate strategies to be implemented
by the municipal government in its solid waste management program. The volume
of biodegradable wastes (67,151.7 kg/year) shows the potential source of organic
fertilizer which likewise creates employment opportunities for the residents. The
volume of residual wastes (20,840.8 kg/d) on the other hand, shall be the basis in
computing the volume capacity of the SLF cells and the lifespan on the disposal
facility. The volume of special wastes (2,512.9) will be the basis in coming up with
the dimensions of the septic vault for toxic and hazardous wastes (THWs). These will
all be the basis for decision makers on the alternative technologies to be procured
that will lead to ZERO WASTE MANAGEMENT.

CHAPTER 5
Legal / Institutional Framework
Republic Act 9003 otherwise known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management
Act of 2000 was enacted in response to the waste problem of the country. It mandates
all public officials to implement the provisions of the law and to be conscious of the
adverse impact of improper waste management and to address the problem.
5.1 LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
In compliance to the mandates of RA 9003, the Sangguniang Bayan has

enacted related laws and enforced regulations on solid waste management.
Table 5.1 List of Ordinances Related to SWM
Local Laws and Regulations Title

Ordinance No. 28 – 2014 Environment Code of Sta. Ana,
Cagayan
Executive Order No. 19 – 2014 Organizing the Municipal Solid Waste
Management Board Technical
Working Group (MSWMB TWG)
Executive Order No. 17 – 2014 Reorganization of the Municipal Solid
Waste Management Board (MSWMB)
Ordinance No. 16 – 2011 An ordinance mandating the gradual
decrease in the use of plastic bags in
all commercial establishments within
the municipality of Sta. Ana, Cagayan
and for other purposes.
Ordinance No. 10 – 2009 An ordinance requiring all public
utility vehicles of plying in the
municipality of Sta. Ana, Cagayan to
have garbage receptacles.

5. ROLES
To ensure smooth program implementation, various offices and departments
within the municipal government, component barangays of the municipality,
national government agencies (NGAs), non-government organizations (NGOs) and
other interest groups are actively taking part to address ESWM concerns.
Listed below are the various groups and their responsibilities on ESWM:
 Municipal Solid Waste Management Board

 Develop a Municipal Ecological solid Waste Management Plan and
oversee its implementation
 Recommend measures and safeguards against pollution and for
preservation of the natural ecosystem
 Coordinate with the barangay and identify areas within the
municipality that have a common solid waste management problem as
a basis for planning ecological solid waste management plan
 Review after two years or as the need arises the Municipal Solid Waste
Management Program, and
 Convene joint meetings of the Municipal Ecological Solid waste
Management Board and the Barangay Ecological Solid Waste
Management Committee for purposes of integrating, synchronizing,
monitoring and evaluating the development and implementation of the
Municipal Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan.
5.3 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD

By virtue of Executive Order No. 18-2019, the Municipal Solid Waste
Management Board was created. Below is the composition of the Board:
Chairman: Hon. Darwin A. Tobias Municipal Mayor

Members: Hon. Carlo Costales SB, Committee on Environment
Hon. Bienvenido Recolizado SB, Committee on Health
Hon. Jezarin Ibus LNB President
Engr. Remedios A. Nepomuceno MPDC
Dr. Corazon R. Bilbao MHO
Engr. Von Andre P. Quilente Municipal Engineer
Mr. Richard Alibania OIC Municipal Agriculturist

Ms. Florence D. Obiano MENRO Designate
Ms. Soledad Sampayan Coordinating Principal
Sr. Minerva Caampued SASEC Chairman
Mrs. Imelda Tobias SAMVA President
Mr. Dennis Carino MLGOO
Mr. Relito Bautista Market Administrator
Ms. Joselyn Taylor SAHARRA Chairman
For. Aida S. Adap CENRO/DENR Rep.
Secretariat: Danilo R. Rugrug Jr. AA1

Adoracion Quero AA
Presently, the MSWMB is on track in the implementation of SWM programs

and activities. To sustain this, hereunder were the planned activities of the MSWMB
to date:
 Conduct of IEC to barangays during Synchronized Barangay Assembly
Day;
 Monitoring compliance to existing ordinances relative to SWM.
 Conduct of regular meetings and consultations with members and
stakeholders
5.4 BARANGAY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES
The Barangay Solid Waste Management Committee (BSWMC) shall take the
lead in the implementation of the SWM in the barangay. Currently, all barangays in
the LGU have their functional BSWMC.
The following were the roles and responsibilities of the BESWMC:

 Formulate a community solid waste management program consistent
with that of the municipality. Policies and plans to implement the
program shall include but not limited to the following strategies:
 Be responsible for segregation and collection of solid waste especially
for biodegradable, compostable and reusable wastes; Provided, that the

 collection of the non-recyclable materials and residual wastes shall be

responsibility of the municipality;
 Establish within the barangay or cluster of barangays a MRF, a
redemption or eco-centers in a barangay-owned or leased land or any
suitable open space to be determined by the Sangguniang Barangay;
 Allocate barangay funds for the barangay ecological solid waste
management program, approved by the Sangguniang Bayan;
 The committee shall organize a Core of Area/Street Coordinators thru
the conduct of trainings for barangay residents on segregation,
composting, recycling and livelihood opportunities from use of
recyclable wastes and to monitor their implementation;
 Integrate the Ecological Solid Waste Management program in the
Barangay Development Plan and/or Annual Investment Program;
 Find alternative sources of funds other than the regular barangay
budget;
 Submit a monthly report to the Municipal ESWMB on the progress of
the program copy furnished the local DILG office;
 The Barangay Ecological Solid Waste Management Committee shall
from time to time call on any other concerned sectors within its
territorial jurisdiction, as it may deem necessary.
Table 5.3 List of BESWMC

Barangay Barangay Captain E.o No
Casagan George M. Peneyra Sr. E. O. No. 2018-6
Casambalangan Gavino Benjamin C. Ruiz E. O. No. 07-2018
Centro Jezarene Victor C. Ibus E. O. No. 06-2018
Diora Zinungan Manuel N. Palarca E. O. No. 05-2018
Dungeg Larry M. Talaro E. O. No. 05-2018
Kapanikian Rizalyn M. Viernes E. O. No. 03-2018
Marede Esperidion L. Acacio E. O. No. 10-2018
Palawig Nelia A. Dela Cruz E. O. No. 06-2018
Parada Batu Oscar A. Bumanglag E. O. No. 06-2018
Patunungan Avelino R. Soriano E. O. No. 06-2018
Rapuli Jimmy B. Gamurot E. O. No. 06 S-2018

San Vicente Eduardo A. Palor E. O. No. 01-2018
Sta. Clara Leoden L. Dalipe E. O. No. 06-2018
Sta. Cruz Edgar E. Ursolum E. O. No. 06-2018
Tangatan Isabelo C. Cariño E. O. No. 07-2018
Visitacion Arnulfo Y. Rituria E. O. No. 06-2018
5.5 STAKEHOLDERS PARTICIPATION
Solid Waste Management is a major responsibility of everyone. It is a complex

task which requires appropriate organization capacity and cooperation between
numerous stakeholders in the private and public sectors. Their active participation
through their consolidated efforts would greatly contribute to the attainment of the
LGU’s vision for a safe and healthy environment.
 Municipality
 Enforce bylaws and regulations and mobilize resources required on
SWM.
 Take measures to enhance public awareness on SWM through IEC and
advocacies.
 Encourage active participation of stakeholders.
 Barangays
 Implement the clean and green program.
 Shall establish, operate and manage a Materials Recovery Facility as a
processing facility for biodegradable waste and recovery of recyclable
materials.
 Conducts advocacy campaign on SWM especially on proper waste
segregation
 Households
 Shall practice segregation at source and ensure proper waste
management
 Support the barangay in its advocacy on SWM

 Private Entities and Institutions

 Supports the municipality in its IEC on proper waste segregation;
 Take a pro-active role in the orientation on proper waste management
practices in the community; and
 Helps the municipality in the implementation of municipal ordinances,
laws and regulations relating to solid waste management.
 Academe
 Help the LGU in its advocacies on SWM
 Include SWM in its curriculum as well as the roles and responsibilities
of each sector in the community.
 Conduct research related to environment concerns
 Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA)

 Advocate the practice waste reduction and segregation to its covered
entities and establishments;
 Assist LGU in their advocacies on SWM;
 Support LGU in their operations and programs on SWM.
 Sta. Ana Hotel, Restaurant and Resorts Association (SAHARRA)

 Practice waste segregation in every establishments
 Support LGU in their advocacies on SWM
 Sta. Ana Social and Environmental Concern (SASEC)

 Assist LGU in the IEC Campaign
 Support LGU in their operations and programs on SWM
 Non-government organizations and the business sector

 Establish linkages to explore avenues to market the recycled products;
 Support the enhancement of organic fertilizer production;
 Support the municipality in its livelihood program through access to
credit financing, and
 Help the municipality in the institution of incentives and
awards program with respect to the practice of proper waste
management and segregation
CHAPTER 6
Plan Strategy
6.1 VISION AND MISSION
Vision
By year 2028, LGU SANTA ANA envision that Solid Waste Management
Program is fully implemented, operational and the constituents are participatory to
all programs and activities to provide environmentally sound and healthy
environment.
Mission
“The Municipality of Santa Ana commits to implement strictly the ordinances

and other existing laws on Solid Waste Management and allocate necessary
resources for efficient delivery of services.”
Goals and Objectives
To promote health and sanitation and ensure a balanced ecology

To mitigate air and water pollution
To implement responsive and sustainable ESWM programs and ensure full
implementation of laws and policies
To establish the Municipal Environment and Natural Resources (MENR) Office
To provide adequate SWM facilities
To institutionalize waste reduction and segregation at source through massive
and intensive IEC
To strengthen coordinative mechanisms and linkages that will foster active
involvement and participation of all stakeholders in the municipality
To identify and explore livelihood opportunities related to ESWM to generate
local employment

To enact appropriate legislative measures on SWM and ensure its

implementation
To promote and advocate environment-friendly practices and lifestyle
6.2 TARGETS
RA 9003 provides for the mandatory diversion of wastes generated by the

municipality. The municipality of Santa Ana committed to reduced 54% of disposed
waste by the end of 2019. To reach the target, the LGU must intensify its campaign
for composting, recycling and adopt alternative technologies for residual waste.
The projected waste disposal shall be the basis in coming up with the
frequency of collection, number of collection equipment to be utilized and the volume
capacity of the disposal facility.
To comply with this provision, waste diversion targets were set as follows:
Table 6.1 Diversion and Disposal Target

WASTE
WASTE DISPOSED
TOTAL
YEAR DIVERTED tonnes/year
tonnes/year
tonnes/year
2019 3,777.30 2,039.74 1,737.56

2020 3,838.14 2,226.12 1,612.02
2021 3,899.85 2,339.91 1,559.94
2022 3,962.74 2,536.15 1,426.58
2023 4,026.49 2,738.01 1,288.48
2024 4,091.31 2,823.01 1,268.31
2025 4,157.22 2,910.05 1,247.16
2026 4,224.09 2,999.10 1,224.99
2027 4,292.15 3,090.35 1,201.80
2028 4,642.02 3,674.83 967.19
CUMULATIVE TOTAL 40,911.29 27,377.27 13,534.03

6.3 STRATEGIES
Waste Reduction
6.3.1Waste Segregation and reduction at source
Doable and practical programs to advocate waste avoidance and waste

reduction at source like use of organic materials for packaging shall be implemented
by the LGUs at all levels.
Waste Segregation into four (4) classifications: biodegradable, recyclable,
residual and special shall be implemented in all barangays by phase starting in
urban and coastal barangays and in areas where tourism and economic activities
are situated.
6.3.2 Storage, Collection and Transport

Rural barangays shall manage re-usable, recyclable, and compostable
materials generated in their areas of jurisdiction. To implement this strategy, the
barangay government shall have the option to mandate all waste generators to
manage their own biodegradable and recyclable wastes or to establish a mechanism
to collect these wastes for centralized composting of biodegradable and sale of factory
returnable. The municipal government on the other hand, shall collect residual and
special wastes from designated pick-up points and transport them to the Central
MRF or disposal facility.
In urban barangays and in locations where tourism and economic activities
are situated, the Municipal Government shall take charge in the management of all
types of wastes. Corresponding garbage fees shall, however, be collected to subsidize
costs.
6.3.3 Recovery and Processing
Each Barangay shall maintain and operate a Materials Recovery Facility for
processing activities and temporary storage of residual and special waste. A record
on the volume of wastes brought at the MRF shall be maintained for monitoring and
as basis for policy formulation.

The LGU, on the other hand, shall also maintain and operate a Central MRF
which will have the following features: (1) Area for final sorting; (2) Area that will
house the Processing Facilities; (4 Area for Composting Facility and (4) Area for the
temporary storage of THWs.
6.3.4 Final Disposal
The Municipal government shall establish a Category 1 Sanitary Landfill (SLF)

as the final disposal facility for solid wastes. Facilities, amenities and structures to
be constructed shall be in accordance with the Guidelines set by the NSWMC and
other concerned agencies. The initial cell has an area of 50m x 25x 5m
Other Key Elements Of Strategy
Massive and intensive IEC shall be conducted in all sectors to inform them of
their responsibilities in the entire ESWM program of the municipality.
Close coordination with the barangay and mechanisms to strengthen vertical

and horizontal linkages shall be established to ensure the sustainability and social
acceptability of the program.
Corollary to these efforts shall be the enactment of policies and other

legislative measures that will push and propel the successful implementation of the
municipality’s ESWM program.
Regular monitoring and evaluation on program implementation shall be

conducted to come up with the needed interventions that will improve the delivery
of SWM services to the constituents.
And finally, to make solid waste management a source of revenue for the LGU,
wastes from CEZA locators can be accommodated in the Municipal SLF for a
corresponding Tipping Fee.

CHAPTER 7
SWM System
Using the Solid Waste Management Profile, other relevant data and the
results of the Situational Analysis, the municipality through the Municipal Solid
Waste Management Board(MSWMB) adopts and implement Solid Waste
Management System that aims to address the concern on SWM from source
generation until its final disposal. It adheres to the four (4) stages of solid waste
management and the compliance to existing environmental laws.
7.1 SOURCE REDUCTION
Reduction of waste at source using the 3Rs (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) is

considered as the most basic strategy in addressing the solid waste problem in the
municipality.
Waste minimization or waste reduction strategies to be advocated starting

2019 are the following:
Table 7.1. Waste Reduction Strategies
Practices to be Advocated Waste to be Target Sector/s

Reduced
Purchase of products with
reusable or recyclable Residual waste All sectors and
containers constituents
Recycling/re-use of Recyclable materials Institutions/schools
materials Households
Poultry and Livestock Biodegradable Households

raising
Backyard composting/ Biodegradable Households
Organic Farming Farmers
Institutions/Schools
Sale of Recyclable Recyclable Households
Materials Commercial
Establishments
Institutions

Use of Bayong, paper and Residual Waste generators
other biodegradable Commercial
packaging Establishments
Full Operation of Basura Recyclable, Residual, All sectors and constituents

Ko Kabuhayan Ko Program Biodegradable
Sustainability of BIGAS SA Recyclable and All sectors
BASURA Project Residual with
Potential
To institutionalize these strategies, existing ordinances and policies shall be

strictly enforced in all levels of government. In support to this, an awards and
incentives program shall also be implemented by the local government unit (LGU).
These waste reduction strategies shall contribute in attaining the projected

waste diversion averaging to 2,737.73 tons per annum.
7.2 COLLECTION
7.2.1 Overview
Rural barangays shall manage re-usable, recyclable, and compostable

materials generated in their areas of jurisdiction. To implement this strategy, the
barangay government shall have the option to mandate all waste generators to
manage their own biodegradable and recyclable wastes or to establish a mechanism
to collect these wastes for centralized composting of biodegradable and sale of factory
returnable. The municipal government on the other hand, shall collect residual and
special wastes from designated pick-up points and transport them to the Central
MRF or disposal facility.
In urban barangays and in areas where tourism and economic activities are
situated, the Municipal Government shall take charge in the management of all types
of wastes. Pick-up points and schedule for storage and set-out shall be established
to ensure the smooth and systematic collection of solid waste. Only segregated waste
shall be collected and shall only be on the date and time designated for collection.
Unauthorized establishment of dumping areas shall be prohibited and considered as
illegal to be dealt with in accordance with law. Corresponding garbage fees shall,
however, be collected to subsidize costs for collection.

7.2.2 COLLECTION EQUIPMENT AND ROUTES
The Municipality has the following waste collection vehicles as shown

below.
Figure 7.1 Collection Vehicle of the Municipal Government
Collection Frequency and Routes

Using the average waste generation per day of urban and rural barangays and the types of
wastes being collected by the Municipality as basis, the frequency of collection is as follows:
Table 7.2 Collection Frequency
Barangay Collection Vehicle Capacity (m3) Frequency
Urban Garbage Compactor 6 Daily
Mini Dump truck 4
Market Garbage Compactor 4 Daily
Rural Garbage Compactor 6 Daily
Mini Dump truck 4
Multi cab 1 By schedule
The existing dump truck will continue to collect wastes. Regular repairs and
maintenance shall be conducted to avoid unnecessary distraction and inconveniences during
collection.
The collecting dump trucks will have 2 drivers and 6 garbage haulers. To protect
them from handling hazard wastes, they will be provided with protective apparatus like boots,
gloves, mask and even raincoat to use during rainy days.
For cost-efficiency and program sustainability, the initial frequency and route
of collection shall be determined using the WACS results. In the succeeding years,
however, the frequency and route of collection shall be determined based on the
actual volume of collection.
Weekly collection of wastes shall be undertaken using the hereunder schedule:

Table 7.3. Weekly Route of Collection

Year Barangays Covered Schedule of Collection
2019 Casambalangan
Centro
Diora Zinungan
Palawig Daily 7:00 AM
Rapuli
San Vicente
Sta. Cruz
Tangatan
Market
2020 Barangays covered in2019
Casagan
Marede
Parada Batu Daily 7:00 AM
Visitacion
Dungeg
Kapanikian
2021 Barangays covered in 2018 & 2019

Patunungan Daily 7:00 AM
Residual and special wastes from Palaui Island, the famous ecotourism
destination in the municipality, shall be transported to the fish port situated in
Barangay San Vicente early morning of Tuesday in time for the scheduled collection
every 7:00 o’clock in the morning.
To improve collection efficiency and maximize the resources of the municipal

government, a record on the volume of wastes collected from the various routes shall
be maintained as basis in re-routing or reprogramming.
A policy mandating all waste generators to properly package their residual

wastes in sacks or any safe, clean and dry packaging materials shall also be
implemented. This is to make sure that their wastes being stock-piled for one (1)
week are free from odor and unpleasant smell.
To ensure that collection of wastes is systematically undertaken, the existing

two (2) garbage compactor for non-biodegradable wastes and one (1) mini-dump
truck shall be augmented with one (1) garbage compactor and one (1) dump truck
on 2020 and 2021 respectively.

Figure 5.
Proposed
Collection
Equipment
7.2.3 Private Collection service
Collection of residual and special shall be undertaken by the municipal

government hence, services of a private collection company shall not be availed.
Although junkshops and itinerant buyers are open to buy recyclable materials
directly from the households and other waste generators, the barangay or interested
groups in the barangay may engage in the buy and sell of recyclable materials.
7.2.4 Storage and setout
Barangay Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) shall serve as temporary storage

areas or designated pick-up points for residual and special wastes. A policy which
requires all barangays to ensure the functional operation of its MRF and further
institutionalize waste segregation at source shall be enforced. To ensure that the
Purok/Barangay MRF will not be proliferated by insects and astray animals, residual
and special wastes shall only be brought by the residents to the MRF a day before
the scheduled municipal collection.

Figure 7.2 Barangay Material Recovery Facility
In residential areas, plastic containers/ drums are required for waste

storage. Garbage bins should be placed in alleys or at curb sides designated as pick-
up points. Accumulated waste at street sides collected through push carts to be
hauled to garbage trucks. Schools hospitals are required to provide their respective
establishment the prescribed labelled trash bins.
Figure 7.3 Trash Bins

7.2.5 Segregated recyclables
The MRF will serve as the temporary storage area for the recyclable materials.
All barangays are required to have their own MRF. For barangays that will venture
into buying and selling of recyclable materials and factory returnable, technical and
financial assistance in setting-up their economic enterprise shall be provided by
higher LGUs.
Existing junkshops and itinerant buyers in the municipality shall also be
organized and strengthened so that they could accommodate all kinds and types of
recyclable materials regardless of volume. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with
the junkshops shall be forged to formalize agreements on the buying of recyclable
materials.
7.2.6 Segregated Compostable
Compostable shall not be collected by the barangay or municipal government

in rural areas. These shall be managed through backyard or other methods of
composting.
Only biodegradable materials from the public market, urban barangays,

public places maintained by the municipal government and tourism destinations
shall be collected and transported to the processing facility for vermi-composting or
other acceptable methods.
Proposed site for the processing facility is the Central MRF situated at
barangay Centro.
7.2.7 Mixed solid waste/residuals
The municipality will strictly implement the “NO SEGREGATION, NO

COLLECTION” policy. Hence, collection of mixed wastes shall not be allowed.
Only properly packed and sealed residual and special wastes shall be
accommodated for collection. Safety and sanitary measures shall also be instituted
to avoid foul smell and or thriving of worms or bacteria.
Table 7.5 Types of Collection Vehicle, Capacity and Collection Frequency for 5 years
from 2019-2023
Vehicle Capacity Period of Implementation
(m3) Collection 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Frequency
Garbage Compactor (new) 6 Daily x x x x x
Garbage Compactor (old) 4 Daily x x x x x
Garbage Combage(to be 6 Daily x x x x
procured
Mini Dump Truck 4 Daily x x x x x
Plans for Collecting Residuals
The Municipal Government scheduled separate collection of residual

waste from the urban barangays and rural barangays. Residual waste collected
from the different barangays shall be placed and disposed in a landfill cell.
Plan to Increase Coverage of Collection Service
The Material Recovery Facility and designated pick-up points at the

clustered barangays are collected by the Municipal Government on a scheduled
basis.
7.3 SEGREGATION, RECYCLING, AND COMPOSTING
As mandated in RA 9003, segregation, recycling and composting of

segregated materials are the responsibility of the barangay. The LGU and the
barangay should work hand in hand to achieve the goals of this plan.

7.3.1 Segregation
Waste Segregation into four (4) classifications: biodegradable, recyclable,

residual and special shall be implemented in all barangays by phase starting in
urban and coastal barangays and in areas where tourism and economic activities
are situated.
To institutionalize this, the local legislative body shall enact appropriate

measures that would address the problem on waste segregation at source and
support the proper and successful implementation of the program.
The Barangay Officials shall serve as implementing arm in the barangay level
and shall also be in-charge in program monitoring and evaluation. Capacity building
activities and massive IEC shall be conducted in all barangays. House to house
distribution of flyers on waste The Barangay Officials shall serve as implementing
arm in the barangay level and shall also be in-charge in program monitoring and
evaluation. Reduction and segregation shall be undertaken. All households shall be
provided with segregation guides (printed color-coded reading materials) to ensure
that they are properly informed of the policy.
Incentives for the Search for Model Barangay conducted yearly shall be
increased to make it more appealing to the barangays. Households with best
practices shall also be rewarded.
Figure 7.4 Proposed waste receptacles in public places
Receptacles in public places Receptacles in public places

7.3.2 Recycling
Recycling activities in the MRF shall be institutionalized to include a

component for market identification and product launching in commercial
establishments. Training for MRF managers and ESWM Enforcers in the barangay
shall be conducted by the Municipal LGU to ensure the smooth implementation of
the program. Recycling activities conducted by schools and other groups shall be
sustained and encouraged by opening avenues for market development. To do this,
close coordination shall be undertaken with the Department of Trade & Industry
(DTI) and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) that offer livelihood training for
women and youth relative to recycling of solid wastes.
An Annual inter-school competition for Best Recycled Product shall be
conducted to encourage recycling activities among school age children and the
youth.
Figure 7.5 Design of MRF
Municipal MRF Barangay MRF
Figure 7.6. Recycled Products

7.3.3. Composting/Management of Biodegradable Waste
Backyard composting practiced in rural barangays and the agricultural waste

processing undertaken by the Farmer’s Organization (SAGIBU) and the Basura Ko
Kabuhayan Ko Program (BK3), shall be complemented by vermi-composting at the
municipal MRF that will serve as central processing for biodegradable waste coming
from the municipal/government institutions. Composting technology to be
introduced will be a combination of mechanical composting, static composting, and
other methods (using composting bio-reactor). Record on the quantities of
biodegradable wastes composted will be maintained to keep track of the waste
diversion targets of the LGU. The municipality will establish mechanisms to ensure
proper handling and managing of compostable wastes.
Table 7.6 Quantity of Waste by Barangay to be Composted (kg/day)
Barangay Biodegradable(kg/day)
Casagan 39.95
Casambalangan 36.00
Centro 62.35
Diora Zinungan 13.9
Dungeg 12.26
Kapanikian 37.14
Marede 15.73
Palawig 28.54
Parada Batu 16.00
Patunungan 23.18
Rapuli 35.11
San Vicente 94.42
Sta. Clara 14.03
Sta. Cruz 9.97
Tangatan 54.37
Visitacion 19.698
Total 512.64

Overall, the municipality will support the barangays in their composting

activities. The municipal composter which will be established in 2020 will serve as
model facility for the barangays to replicate. It will also be a laboratory for
capacitation. The municipal government will provide technical assistance to the
barangays by conducting hands-on training and other capability-building activities
through its technical staff from the Municipal Agriculturist Officer (MAO).
Figure 7.7. Composting Methods and Technologies
Methods of determining categories of biodegradable waste for diversion
For Composting:
Waste diversion through composting of biodegradable waste will be undertaken with the
following:

 Pilot Projects in the different barangays (Vermi composting).

 Testing of results on the nutrient contents of the products.
 Feasibility study on the economic and financial viability of the program.
7.3.4 Marketing and Market Development
Farmers will be encouraged to utilize soil ameliorants for farming and

backyard gardening. This will reduce dependence to commercial fertilizer which is
costly and non-environment friendly. To fully implement this strategy, assistance to
farmers will be given in the form of organic fertilizers. Incentives shall be given to
farmers that practice organic or natural farming. The municipal LGU will also tap
the assistance of DTI for the expansion of its market base and DOST for the
implementation of appropriate product verification protocols.
A memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the LGU and junkshop owners

shall be forged to sustain market development and management. A monitoring
scheme will be established to determine the volume of waste brought to junkshops
and maintain a database needed for plan review and decision making.
Effective marketing of recyclable materials is part of revenue generation strategy.
Competitive prices shall be observed. Prices of some waste materials changes normally, storing
the recovered recyclable in the facility for several weeks can result to better selling price in the
market for greater profit. The Municipal MRF will collect factory returnable like glass/bottles,
paper/cartons, plastic, metals and other materials that may have market value. Table below
shows the estimated buying prices for recyclable materials.
Table 7.8 Estimate Prices for Recyclable Materials

Recyclable Materials Quantities Buying Price Selling Price
Papers 1 kilogram 3.00
Cartons 1 kilogram 2.00 1 kilogram 2.00
Plastic 1 kilogram 18.00
Tin Cans 1 kilogram 2.00
Aluminum 1 kilogram 180.00
Bottles 1 piece 1

Scrap Metals 1 kilogram 13.00
Iron 1 kilogram 1.00
Tanso 1 kilogram 250.00
7.4 TRANSFER
The Material Recovery Facility (MRF) will serve as transfer facility for residual
and special waste a day before municipal collection. The municipal government will
provide technical capability trainings for the operation and management of MRF,
records keeping and financial management to all concerned stakeholders. The
capacity of the barangay MRF will be designed to accommodate the future demand
of residual and special waste that are temporarily stored in a monthly basis.
The municipal MRF will also function as center for learning where barangays
could get experiential learning in the operation and management of the facility.
7.5 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR RESIDUAL WASTE
Adoption of an alternative technology for residual wastes shall be

implemented starting 2019 to prolong the life of the Sanitary Landfill Facility.
To be able to implement an alternative technology that shall be able to

produce marketable products like decorative pavement blocks and other non-load
bearing concrete products or pots and other products made out of plastics, the
Municipality had already procured equipment’s such as Plastic Shredder, Plastic
Densifier, Glass Crasher and Hollow Block Maker which will fully operational this
year 2019. We shall coordinate with the DOST for technical assistance on the
procedure of such. Intensive research on the feasibility of the project and the
environmental implications of these activities shall be undertaken by the SWB and
TWG. Individuals, organizations and institutions who are interested to engage in
residual waste processing shall be supported and assisted by the municipal
government.

Figure 7.8 Alternative Technologies for Residual Waste
Glass Crasher
Plastic Shredder
PLASTIC DENSIFIER HOLLOW BLOCK MAKER
7.6 DISPOSAL
A Category 1 Sanitary Landfill (SLF) shall be established as the final disposal

facility for solid wastes. Facilities, amenities and structures to be constructed shall
be in accordance with the Guidelines set by the NSWMC and other concerned
agencies.

After establishing the SLF, the Residual Containment Area (RCA) shall no
longer be utilized and shall be rehabilitated in accordance with existing standards
and policies issued by the Environmental Management Bureau.
7.6.1 Solid Waste Disposal Capacity
The table below presents the breakdown of residual and special wastes to be
disposed in tons per annum:
Year Residual Special Total

2019 702.34 84.68 787.02
2020 713.65 86.05 799.70
2021 725.12 87.43 812.55
2022 736.82 88.84 825.66
2023 748.67 90.27 838.94
2024 760.72 91.72 852.45
2025 772.98 93.20 866.18
2026 785.41 94.70 880.11
2027 798.07 96.23 894.29
2028 863.12 104.07 967.19
Cumulative Total 7,606.90 917.20 8524.10
Average 760.69 91.72 852.41
Given the standard that 623 kilograms is equal 1 cubic meter of wastes, as
provided in the “Guidelines in the Establishment of Categorized Disposal Facilities”
published by the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC), the
cumulative volume of residual wastes in ten years time is 15,980 cubic meters.
Using the data from the above table, the target life span of the SLF was
computed using the formula:
DLC = {ADLV + CMV} x TLS
Where:
DLC = Designed Landfill Capacity

ADLV = Annual Designed Landfill Volume ( in cubic meters)
CMV = Cover Material Volume, in cubic meters
The target life span of one (1) cell with a dimension of (50m x 25m x 5m) or a
volume capacity of 6,250 cubic meters is equal to 11years. To be able to

accommodate the total cumulative volume of approximately 16,000 cubic meters

residual waste, the LGU shall construct the second cell on 2029.
The implementation of Alternative technology of Basura Ko Kabuhayan Ko will

divert approximately 6,000 cubic meters residual wastes in the entire planning
period or an average of 500 cubic meters per annum. This will not only prolong the
lifespan of the SLF but will also introduce new sources of livelihood to the residents
in the municipality.
7.6.2 Existing Facilities
While construction of the SLF cell is ongoing, a portion of MRF is utilized as

a residual containment area (RCA). To ensure proper waste management, only
residual wastes are temporarily stored in the area and final sorting is being
undertaken prior to disposal. Copy of approved SCRP is provided in Annex .
All residual wastes temporarily stored at RCA shall be transferred in the SLF
cell, after construction and its full operation.
Figure 10. Picture of the Residual Containment Area (RCA)

7.6.3 New Facilities
The new facility is a category 1 Sanitary Landfill (SLF) designed and constructed
using acceptable engineering standards. Potential environmental impacts shall be
significantly considered in its design, construction, operation and maintenance.
Since the site is far from residential areas, no social resistance in the establishment
of the SLF is expected. In order to ensure the health and sanitation of the residents,
standards shall be set in the collection and transport of segregated wastes from the
waste source to the disposal facility.
The area will be designed and established based on hydro-geological

considerations which include complete facilities and amenities like construction of
residual waste cell, vault for special wastes, leachate pond, rainwater collector or
lagoon, drainage canal, monitoring well, washing and sanitation area, rainwater
collector, administration building with guard house, access road, buffer zones and
vegetation, and Municipal MRF for final sorting and waste recovery.
Figure 11. Site Development Plan

7.6.4 Categorized Disposal Facilities (Sanitary Landfill) Design
The Cell
With the average residual waste generation of 1,600 cubic meters per
annum, the new landfill cell with a dimension of 50m x 25m x 5m will be sufficient
for the next 10 years. Though adequate in capacity, ecologically acceptable
alternative technologies for the recovery of residual wastes shall also be undertaken
to prolong the lifespan of the SLF.
Figure 12. SLF Design – the cell
Leachate Pond
Considering the contour of the site, the leachate pond will be constructed at
the lower portion of the cell chamber. PVC pipes shall be used for the leachate
collection lines.
The 14% moisture content of mixed waste gathered during WACS and the average
volume of rainfall in the municipality were the major considerations in coming up
with the design of the leachate pond. It shall be an open facility with two (2) filtering
ponds for the initial and final filtering.
Figure 13. Design of leachate pond
cell
Rain Water Collector
A drainage canal situated at the upper part of the cell’s chamber will serve as
collector for rainwater and uncontaminated surface run-off. This will be constructed
using concrete culvert. Because of its strategic positioning, rain water and
uncontaminated run-off will fall by gravity into the lagoon.

Figure 14. Design of rainwater collector run-off or lagoon
7.7 SPECIAL WASTE
Special wastes shall be handled properly and put to the toxic waste vault
at MRF, later the LGU Santa Ana will put up a vault at the Sanitary Landfill.
Inappropriate disposal of these wastes may cause contamination, toxicity and
detriment to environment. Since special wastes have mixed to other waste, a
vault shall be constructed incorporated to sanitary land fill. Special waste
generators will pay users fee for maintenance. This will be also additional
source of income of LGU. The designed storage vault shall be intended to
accommodate the projected volume of special wastes to be disposed.
Figure 7.10 Estimated Quantities of Special Waste to be Generated in the Future
Special Waste Average Quantity (kg. /Day)

Busted bulbs, tubes & Lamps 0.4
Containers of paints & thinners & other
solvents 0.48
Containers of rugby 0.02

Containers of roof cement 0.48
Grease and oil 0.18
Containers of disinfectants, sanitizers,
insecticides, etc 0.80
Worn out appliances 0.80
Spent dry and wet cell batteries 0.05
Expired drugs and chemicals 0.48
Asbestos materials 0.41
Cosmetic waste 0.34
Health Care Waste 1.02
Total 5.51 kg. /day
7.7.1 Health Care Waste
Health care wastes (HCWs)of the Municipal Rural Health Units (RHUs) shall
be disposed in a septic vault within the SLF compound while private clinics, hospitals
and other health care waste generators shall be mandated to construct their own
septic vaults for toxic and hazardous wastes. Proper care and handling of these
wastes shall be established to avoid contamination. Only residual, bulky and non-
recoverable wastes shall be collected by the LGU for disposal at the SLF.
The septic vault shall be designed in order to accommodate the projected

volume of special wastes discussed in Chapter IV of this plan.

Figure 15. Design of septic vault
7.7.2 Toxic and Hazardous waste
A Municipal Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) for the temporary storage of

THWs shall be established in a location accessible to Service Providers and
companies.
In order to maximize the use of the MRF, the Municipal Composting Facility
shall also be housed within the area. Proper coordination with the concerned
agencies and Service Providers shall be regularly undertaken in order to efficiently
manage these Toxic and Hazardous Wastes (THWs) generated within the
municipality.
7.8 INFORMATION, EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION (IEC)
When the plan has been duly adopted by the Sangguniang Bayan, massive
and intensive IEC shall be conducted to inform the public on the entire SWM system
of the municipality and the corresponding roles and responsibilities of the various
stakeholders. It is a strategy to solicit and strengthen the support and cooperation
of the constituents on the municipality’s solid waste management program.

7.8.1 Introduction
The advantages of waste reduction, waste segregation and backyard

composting shall be given emphasis in the IEC. The ill-effects of mixed waste
disposal shall likewise be discussed.
Target audience for the IEC shall be the following:
1. LGU Officials and employees;

2. Barangay Officials;
3. School Heads and Teachers;
4. Youth/Students;
5. Commercial establishments, market vendors, transport groups; and
6. Households
7.8.2 Core Messages
Information Education and Communication campaign shall be conducted in all

barangays during the general assembly meeting. Target audience contributed their core
messages during the IEC. Core messages will be developed after several workshops of the
stake holders. Core messages for the different target audience were presented in table 7.10
Appropriate messages shall be formulated to suit the age, preference, culture
and beliefs of the target audience.
Table 7.11 Core Messages
Target Audience Core Messages

LGU Officials and Employees, Kapaligira’y maganda
Barangay Officials, School Kung di halohalo ang basura.
Heads & Teachers
Be a model,
Segregate your wastes NOW!
A good preacher,
Is also a good follower!
Youth/Students Nang dahil sa basura,

Nabuo ang barkada
Ang bagong CP at PSP ko,

Galing sa recyclable wastes nyo!
Ang kabataan ay siyang pagasa ng bayan,

Kaya mga basura ilagay sa tamang lagayan!
Commercial Establishments, Reusing and recycling garbage,

Market Vendors, Transport Combats economic shortage.
Groups
Mag segregate ng basura
Upang magka Tax Incentive ka!
Mga supot ay tanggihan,

Ng discount, ikaw ay mabigyan!
Kahit sa aking sasakyan,

Mga basura ay maayos tingnan.
Households Hiwalay kung hiwalay,
Ang nabubulok, sa di nabubulok!
Tapat Ko Linis Ko
Mga recyclable materials ngayon,

Mga bagong gamit pagdating ng panahon!
7.8.3 Approach
An ESWM Speakers Bureau or IEC Team compose of representatives from

various stakeholders shall be organized. This group shall take lead in the conduct
of sustained and regular IEC in all sectors of the community and shall be responsible
in advocating sound ESWM practices to the constituents. Appropriate capability
building interventions shall be conducted to capacitate the team in carrying out their
tasks and to hone their Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSAs) in public speaking
and values formation and transformation.
The table below maps out the activities to be undertaken by the ESWM
Speakers Bureau of the Municipality:
Table 7.12 Planned IEC Activities
ACTIVITIES TIMELINE

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Organization
of the ESWM 
Speakers
Bureau
Conduct of /    / / / / / /
IEC
Orientation          
for
Applicants of
Business
Permits,
Marriage &
other
clearances
Feed backing          
session of
ESWM
Speakers
Bureau
Reproduction          
of IEC
Materials
CHAPTER 8
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
8.1 FRAME WORK
Solid wastes shall be classified into four (4) categories: Biodegradable,

Recyclable, Special and Residual wastes. Waste reduction should be the primary
concern of waste generators through segregation at source and proper waste
disposal. For biodegradable waste generated by households, these shall be
managed through backyard composting, reuse and recycling. Recyclable wastes
shall be sold to junkshops and itinerant buyers. The Materials Recovery Facility
maintained in every barangay shall serve as a sorting and recovery facility for
wastes. The Municipal Government shall collect residual and special wastes from
households and barangay MRF for processing in the Municipal MRF and final
disposal in the Sanitary landfill.

For solid waste generated in the public market and other public places
maintained by the municipal LGU, segregated waste shall be collected by the
MLGU for final sorting and processing at the Municipal MRF. After which the
residual and special waste are transported to the SLF for final disposal.
Figure 1. Waste Flow Diagram
Waste Sources (Households, Segregation at Source

Institutions and
Establishments)
Biodegradable Recyclable Special /

Waste Waste Residual Waste Hazardous Waste
Compost Pit (Backyard Sell to Junkshop /

Composting) Itinerant buyers
Barangay Materials Recovery

Facility (MRF)
Barangay
Sanitary Landfill
(SLF)
Municipality
8.2 Diversion Projections
Waste diversion is the prevention and reduction of generated waste through source
reduction, recycling, reuse, or composting. RA 9003 mandates LGUs to divert at least
25% of all solid waste from waste disposal facilities through re-use, recycling and
composting activities and other resource recovery activities and shall be increased
every three (3) years thereafter.
The table below enumerates details of the waste diversion projections on

biodegradable and recyclable wastes. The data shall be useful in determining the
capacity of the Sanitary Landfill and to prolong its life span.
Table 8.1. Projected Volume of Biodegradable and Recyclable to be Diverted in

kilograms per annum
Diversion
Target
Year Biodegradable Recyclable Total (Percentage)
2019 5,588.33
4229.21 1359.13 54.00%
2020 6,098.97
4615.65 1483.32 58.00%
2021 6,410.71
4851.57 1559.14 60.00%
2022 6,948.36
5258.46 1689.90 64.00%
2023 7,501.40
5677.00 1824.40 68.00%
2024 7,734.26
5853.22 1881.04 69.00%
2025 7,972.74
6033.71 1939.04 70.00%
2026 8,216.72
6218.35 1998.37 71.00%
2027 8,466.70
6407.53 2059.17 72.00%
2028 10,068.02
7619.39 2448.63 79.16%
Average 5676.41
1824.21 75,006.21 100%
8.3 MONITORING PROGRAM
Monitoring and evaluation shall be a component in the implementation of the

plan. Regular monitoring shall be conducted by the MSWMB TWG to be able to
identify the progress of PPAs and ensure the smooth implementation of the plan.
Monitoring will allow results and data gathered to steer decision making for better
delivery of SWM programs and services.
The MSWMB shall devise a monitoring and evaluation tool taking into
consideration the existing policies on waste reduction, waste segregation at source
and waste diversion. Analysis and evaluation of results shall be conducted to further
improve and enhance strategies in the implementation of the plan.

8.4 INCENTIVES PROGRAM
Incentives and awards programs are necessary to further motivate and boost
stakeholders to participate in plan implementation and ensure their compliance to
environmental laws and regulations.
Hereunder were the incentives and awards programs to be provided by the

LGU spearheaded by the MSWMB TWG:
Table 8.2: Awards and Incentive Programs on SWM
Awards and Incentives Programs Description

Basura Ko Kabuhayan Ko (BK3) The program shall be spearheaded by
the LGU and Sta. Ana Alliance for
Social and Environmental Concerns
(SASEC) which aims to promote waste
reduction through recycling. The
program shall serve as an avenue to
provide livelihood opportunities to
identified beneficiaries through
recycled materials.
Tax incentives to establishments Free / minimal garbage collection fees
shall be granted to establishments
which practice waste reduction and
segregation. Establishments with
reduced waste comparable to that of
the households shall be eligible for the

incentive.
Annual Search for Cleanest and Awards shall be given to the cleanest
Greenest Barangays and Schools and greenest barangays and schools.
Annual evaluation shall be conducted

by the MSWMB TWG in partnership
with NGOs.
Incentives/Assistance to Barangays Financial assistance shall be given to
with Best Practice on SWM barangays with best practices on SWM.
The LGU shall also assist the barangay
in the availment of grants from funding
institutions.
Incentive to Best in Segregation. 1 kilo of Residual with potential is
equivalent to 1 kilo of rice.
CHAPTER 9
Institutional Aspects
9.1 ROLES
The full and active participation of stakeholders is vital to ensure the smooth
implementation of the plan. To further institutionalize the implementation of SWM
programs in the municipality, collaborative efforts of the LGU, barangays, private
entities, academe and other sectors are necessary. Hereunder are the future roles
and responsibilities of each stakeholder in plan implementation:
Municipal Solid Waste Management Board (MSWMB)
The MSWMB, chaired by the municipal mayor, shall serve as the policy-
making body. They shall take charge in the oversight over the program and will be
accountable to the SB for plan implementation. They shall adopt strategies and
measures to further sustain implementation of SWM plans and programs. The
MSWMB will be supported by its TWG and MENRO.

The LGU through the Municipal and Environment and Natural Resources
Office (MENRO).
The MENRO will serve as the secretariat and implementing arm of the Board.
Hereunder are the roles of the MENRO in plan implementation:
a. It will prepare annual SWM work and financial plans and periodic reports
for submission to the Board;
b. Keep record of all meetings and decisions of the Board, and ensure that
Board decisions are carried out;
c. Collaborate with multi sectoral bodies (i.e., IEC Team, Barangay Speaker’s
Bureau, Volunteer Enforcers and M and E Team);
d. Coordinate with national agencies (i.e., DENR, DTI, DA, DOST), concerned
LGU units and civil society organizations involved in the program.
e. It shall provide assistance to barangays in the formation and training of

barangay SWM committees, in preparing barangay SWM plans and setting
up the Citizen’s Monitoring and Feedback Mechanism.
The MENRO shall have an SWM division that will have three sections: a)
Collection and Transport Section, which shall directly supervise the collection and
transport of the municipal solid wastes; b) MRF Operations, which shall directly
supervise the operation of the municipal composting facility and assist the
barangays and junkshops in the operation of MRFs; c) Disposal Management
Section, which shall directly supervise the disposal of residual and special wastes
and rehabilitation of the disposal facilities.
Barangays
The barangays shall manage and establish a Materials Recovery Facility

(MRF) which as a processing facility for biodegradable waste and recovery of
recyclable wastes. The barangay shall also establish collection/ pick up points for
residual and special wastes.

Barangay Ecological Solid Waste Management Committee (BESWMC)
The barangay Ecological Solid Waste Management Committee shall formulate

the Barangay Ecological Solid Waste Management Strategic Plan to align the ESWM
efforts of the barangays with the Municipal SWM Plan and formulates policies and
strategies on ESWM at the barangay level. They shall also ensure and monitor the
functionality of Barangay MRF.
Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA)
They shall provide support to the LGU in its advocacies on SWM. They shall
enforce proper segregation and waste reduction to CEZA locators and ensure
compliance to existing local laws and regulations on SWM.
Sta. Ana Alliance on Social and Environmental Concerns (SASEC)
The SASEC is an active NGO which supports the LGU in its advocacies on
SWM. They shall be involved in the implementation of SWM programs through
provision of seminars and creation of incentives and awards programs for SWM
implementers.
Sta. Ana Hotels, Restaurants and Resorts Association (SAHARRA)
SAHARRA shall practice proper segregation and waste reduction in its covered
establishments. They shall ensure that tourist comply with the existing regulations
of the LGU on waste management. They shall also support the LGU in its advocacies
through provision of streamers / signage’s in hotels, restaurants and resorts.
Business Establishments
Market, stall owners, vendors shall ensure the proper segregation and
collection of their wastes within their stalls and support the SWM program by
complying the ordinances implemented by the Local Government Unit.

Van, Tricycle and Banca Operators and Drivers
They shall be responsible in maintaining cleanliness through the conduct of

regular clean up in their respective areas / routes. They shall be required to install
waste receptacles on their vehicles where passengers to dispose their waste while
travelling.
Academe (Public and Private schools)
Academe shall strengthen the integration of the SWM program in their

academic curricula to promote environmental protection and awareness among the
students. They shall be involved in the celebration of environmental events such as
conduct of clean up drives, anti-dengue activities, and other similar events.
9.2 LEGAL
9.2.1 Recommended Changes to Municipal Structure
Currently, the Municipal Environment and Natural Resource Office (MENRO)

is detailed in the Municipal Planning and Development Office (MPDO). To ensure
successful and sustained implementation of the municipal solid waste management
program, MENR Office shall be established with permanent MENR Officer and staff.
Hereunder is the proposed organizational structure of the MENRO:

Figure 1. Proposed Organizational Structure of MENRO
Office of the Mayor
MENRO
Natural Resources Solid Waste Management l

Management Unit Unit
Coastal Resources Forest Resources Drivers & MRF SLF

Management Management Collection Crew
Staff Staff staff caretaker
The MENRO as the lead implementer of SWM programs shall directly under
the Office of the LCE. It shall compose of two (2) sections namely; Natural and
Coastal Management Section headed by the Environmental Management Specialist
and Solid Waste and Management and Pollution Control Section headed by the SWM
Officer. Each unit shall be assigned with staff to focus on their respective areas of
concern. For SWM concerns, two (2) drivers and eight (8) utility workers shall be
assigned to ensure sustained and timely collection and other activities.
9.2.2 Zoning and Building Code Changes
There are no major changes on the zoning and building policies of the LGU
shall be undertaken since the propose SLF site is already identified and programmed
in the Municipal Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for such purpose.
However, to ensure compliance to ESWM Programs, an amendment on the

requirements to the issuance of Zoning Clearances and Building Permits shall be
proposed to include the provision of receptacles for the four (4) classifications of

wastes by the concerned applicants and their mandatory attendance to an
orientation on the Basic Provisions of RA 9003.
9.2.3 Plans to Impose Penal Provisions
Imposition of penalties to violators is an effective means of ensuring

compliance to laws and regulations on SWM.
Deputized enforcers shall undertake assigned in various areas of the LGU

shall undertake enforcement activities. To determine the extent of compliance with
ordinances and regulations, regular monitoring shall be conducted by the enforcers.
The monitoring reports shall serve as a basis in assessing whether or not the
community and other stakeholders are well informed / aware with the existing
regulations.
Deputized Enforcers shall be oriented on existing ordinances which provides

for penalties and fees for violators. Warnings to apprehended violators shall be made
and consequently, citation ticket indicating fines and penalties shall be issued to
succeeding violations. Apprehended violators shall also undergo orientation seminar
on SWM to ensure their full compliance and heighten their awareness on SWM
policies and regulations.
Deputized enforcers shall be organized and created through an Executive

Order issued by the Mayor. Among their functions as enforcers are the following:
 Coordinate actions and activities;

 Apprehend violators of ESWM ordinances/Penal provisions of RA
9003 and issue citation tickets;
 Prepare and submit weekly reports to the Mayor through the MENRO;
and
 Perform other related functions as may be required by the Mayor.
9.2.4 Other Legal Requirements

To augment allocation for ESWM Programs, garbage collection fees shall be
imposed to waste generators supported through an ordinance. Awards and
incentives programs for SWM shall be institutionalized with corresponding
budgetary allocations.
To fully arm the deputized enforcers who will serve as “watchdog” in ensuring
the strict imposition of penal provisions stipulated in both national and local laws,
an ordinance shall be enacted. Duties and responsibilities of these enforcers shall
likewise be defined therein.
CHAPTER 10
Social and Environmental Aspects
10.1 SOCIAL ASPECTS
Public awareness and acceptance are one important factor for effective
implementation of solid waste management programs. It is vital to harness public’s
involvement and cooperation since they are the ones who play a major role in the
successful implementation of the plan and SWM programs.
Waste reduction and segregation at source required to households,

establishments and institutions may not be fully achieved / adopted during the
initial implementation. Those who are accustomed to traditional waste disposal
practices like open burning, mixed disposal in backyards and/or non – segregated
disposal to Municipal Garbage collection trucks may have the difficulty of adopting
the required practice. However, the strict enforcement of the LGUs “No Segregation,
No Collection Policy” and massive IEC will eventually mobilize the public in ensuring
their involvement and cooperation in the implementation of SWM programs.
Barangays that will play a crucial role in the management of biodegradable

and recyclable wastes may likewise be hesitant to take lead in the implementation
of the program. Counter-parting of funds to complement budgetary allocation for all
the programs, projects and activities to be implemented shall be institutionalized
between and among the MLGU, BLGU and other stakeholders is another major issue
to be resolved.
Trainings and seminars shall be provided to SWM Implementers in the LGU

to ensure that they effectively implement the ESWM programs. Operational
mechanisms shall be institutionalized to ensure non-proliferation of scavengers and
systematic operations of the SLF.
10.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

The implementation of the municipality’s 10 Year ESWM plan will cause a
significant impact most especially in securing health of the people and protecting the
environment.
The establishment of the SLF as a disposal facility will adequately cater to the
waste generation of the municipality. This will enable a systemized and
environmentally friendly waste management.
In it’s totally, the propose SWM system of the LGU and its disposal facility
poses no threat to the health and sanitation of the residents and ensures sustainable
development.

CHAPTER 11
Cost Estimates /Financial Aspects
11.0 INVESTMENT COST
Investment Cost per Sector
Cost sharing shall be implemented between and among the municipal and
barangay local government units, waste generators and other stakeholders to ensure
the smooth implementation of the municipality’s solid waste management programs.
Investment costs include all facilities, structures and equipment used for the proper
management of solid wastes.
The table below presents the estimated investment cost for ten (10) years and
the corresponding counterpart of each stakeholder in the community:
Table 11.1 Investment Cost per Year by Sector

Year Counterpart Fund per Sector Total
Municipal Barangay Waste
LGU LGU Generators
2019 4,550 320 4,870
2020 3,800 460 700 4,960
2021 3,215 160 3,375
2022 750 248 998
2023 1,682 396 770 2,848
2024 2,255 290 2,545
2025 4,185 213 4,398
2026 4,100 561 847 5,508
2027 2,900 258 3,158
2028 2,508 621 3,128

TOTAL 29,944 3,526 2,317 35,787
Facility costs
The table below presents costs for the facilities and structures on SWM for
the entire planning period:
Table 11.2. Facility Costs per Sector
Facility Cost Stakeholders Total

LGU LGU Generators
Color-coded waste
bins/receptacles 916 488 2,317 3,721
Establishment of Demo Farms 166 166
Construction of MRF 480 480

Establishment of Barangay
Nursery 160 160
Alternative Technology 2,100 1,518 3,618

Establishment of SLF facilities
& amenities 10,200 10,200
Other facilities
1,000 1,000
Total 14,381 2,646 2,317 19,345
Equipment costs
The table below shows a detailed cost on equipment to be procured which

include, among others, stationary equipment like shredder and rolling equipment
like collection vehicles.

Table 11.3. Equipment Costs per Sector

Equipment Cost Stakeholders
Total
LGU LGU Generators
Garbage Compactor 2,317 2,317
Dumptruck 1,655 1,655
Pedicab/Padyak 880 880
Shredder 1,324 1,324
Composter/Bioreactor 3,476 3,476
Grader 2,100 2,100
Mini dumptruck 1,260 1,260
Bulldozer 2,100 2,100
Service Vehicle 1,000 1,000
Generator Set 331 331
Total 15,563 880 - 16,443
Estimated cost to be amortized
Investment costs for solid waste management shall be charged from the
Municipal development fund and other locally-sourced revenues. To augment the
budget from the municipal coffers, barangays and other stakeholders shall likewise
give appropriate counterpart fund for the effective implementation of this plan.
Because of this scheme, availing of loans shall be the last remedy for the LGU.
Hence, no amortizations shall be paid during the entire planning period.
Annual Costs
Total Annual Costs by Year per Sector

Table 11.4. Annual Costs per Year in Thousand Pesos

Year Counterpart Fund per Sector Total
Waste
Municipal LGU Barangay LGU Generators
2019 191 - 191
2020 303 48 351
2021 897 133 1,030
2022 1,420 146 1,566
2023 1,439 161 1,599
2024 1,561 177 1,738
2025 1,587 194 1,781
2026 1,609 214 1,822
2027 1,742 235 1,978
2028 1,772 259 2,030
TOTAL 12,520 1,567 - 14,087
Labor, Administrative and Operating & Maintenance Costs
Classifications of Annual Cost

Operating
Year Administrative and TOTAL
Labor Cost
Cost Maintenance
Cost
2019 80 25 86 191
2020 80 125 146 351
2021 577 145 308 1,030
2022 577 630 359 1,566
2023 577 630 392 1,599
2024 625 635 478 1,738
2025 625 640 516 1,781

2026 625 640 557 1,822
2027 681 645 652 1,978
2028 681 650 699 2,030

TOTAL
5,128 4,765 4,194 14,087
Funding Options
Options to finance the capital investments
Fund to finance capital investments shall largely depend on the 20%

Development Fund of the municipality. For the first two (2) years of program
implementation, approximately PhP10 Million shall be allocated to finance capital
investments. (See Table 11.1)
To ensure the sustainability of the project, other sources of funds to finance

investment costs like grants, aids and donations from national government agencies
or other funding institutions shall be explored by the municipal government.
Financing scheme under the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) shall also be an
additional option for the LGU.
Although loan availment from banks and other development partners is a last option,
the municipal government does not, however, close its doors to avail of assistance
from financing institutions when the need is urgent and necessary.
Options to finance recurring cost
Recurring or annual costs for solid waste management shall be charged from
the Personal Services (PS) component of the IRA and from the budget for
Maintenance & Other Operating Expenses (MOOE). Revenues generated from the
collection of garbage or environmental fees, imposition of fines and penalties and
other locally-sourced revenues may also be used to finance recurring costs.

Projected sources of revenues
Although implementation of the municipality’s Solid Waste Management

Program (SWMP) is basically a social service, other sources revenues must also be
explored to augment funding from the IRA. This strategy will ensure the
sustainability of the SWM services provided by the municipality.
Listed below are the possible sources of revenue:
 Share from the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA)

If the municipality will solely depend from the twenty percent (20%)
development fund of the IRA to finance its solid waste management program,
it is estimated that an average of at least Four Million Pesos
(PhP4,000,000.00) of the Municipal Development Fund should be apportioned
for SWM purposes. Exploring other financing options would lessen the
dependency of the LGU’s solid waste management from the IRA and would
ensure sustainability of the program.
 Garbage or Environmental Fees
Collection monthly garbage or environmental fees from locators of the
Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA) could provide additional revenues
for the municipal government. With the assumption that 50% of CEZA
locators will avail of the SWM services of the LGU, at least PhP2 Million per
year can be generated by the LGU. This will contribute to a more efficient and
effective solid waste management service by the municipality.
 Collection and Use of Fines and Penalties

Fines and penalties from apprehended violators of ESWM ordinances could
be a possible source of revenues to augment budget for SWM programs to be
implemented by the municipality.
 Grants, aids and donations

Grants, aids and donations given by foreign and local donors could also be
requested by the local government unit to finance SWM programs. This
strategy will require the organization of a Technical Working Group (TWG)
which shall be in charged in preparing project proposals and other
requirement of funding agencies.
Breakdown of revenues by year

The table below presents the projected revenues for ten (10) years from the
IRA allocation, income from garbage the collection of garbage or environmental fees,
imposing fines and penalties and economic activities in the MRF/Eco park:
Table 11.6.Projected Revenues in Thousand Pesos

Year Projected Projected Projected Projected TOTAL
Allocation Income from Income Revenues
from the Garbage/ from from
IRA Environmental Fines MRF/Eco
Fees and park
Penalties
2019 4,312 500 24 100 4,936
2020 4,743 2,000 22 130 6,894
2021 2,609 2,200 19 169 4,997
2022 2,869 2,420 17 220 5,527
2023 3,156 2,662 16 286 6,120
2024 3,472 2,928 14 371 6,786
2025 3,819 3,221 13 483 7,536
2026 4,201 3,543 11 627 8,383
2027 4,621 3,897 10 816 9,345
2028 5,083 4,287 9 1,060 10,440
TOTAL 38,886 27,659 156 4,262 70,963
Average 3,889 2,766 16 426 7,096
Cost Evaluation and Comparison
Cost for waste management per capita
To compute for the cost for waste management per capita, the formula below
was used:
Per Capita Cost = total cost/average population
Using the formula above, per capita cost for solid waste management in the
municipality is PhP1.20. This means that for the municipal solid waste
management program to be self-liquidating, an environmental or garbage fee

amounting to at least PhP1.20 per person should be collected from households by

the municipality.
Collection of environmental or garbage fees and imposition of fines and

penalties to apprehended violators should, however, be supported by an ordinance.
Cost for waste management by unit weight
To compute for the cost for waste management by unit weight, the formula
below was used:
Cost by unit weight = total cost/waste generation in kilograms
Using the formula above, cost for solid waste management by unit weight in
the municipality is PhP9.00.This means that if the Municipality opts to accept the
solid wastes of other municipalities for processing in their MRF/Ecopark, a Tipping
Fee of at least PhP9.00 per kilogram of waste should be collected to ensure cost
recovery.
Comparison of costs
The figure below presents a comparison of cost per stage. From the same figure,
we can deduce that stage 4 (establishment of the SLF) will incur the highest cost

Figure 11.2. Comparison of Cost per stage
10%
17%
44%
stage 1
stage 2
stage 3
stage 4
29%
Figure 11.3. Comparison of Cost by Program Component
7% 11%
9%
Environmental Organization
Engineering
Education
73% Enforcement

Ways to optimize costs
In order to optimize the utilization of the LGU’s meagre resources for solid
waste management, the following strategies shall be advocated and implemented by
the municipality:
 Intensive advocacy on waste reduction and segregation at source to reduce

the frequency of waste collection and the volume of wastes;
 Implement a scheme to collect and dispose “only” clean and dry residual
wastes
 Continuously adopt a systematic route of collection to optimize use of vehicles
or collection equipment
 Encourage multi-tasking among SWM personnel for cost-efficiency
Summary
A comparison of the cost and revenues presented in the table below shows
that an average annual revenue of PhP4.9 Million will ensure the smooth and
sustainable implementation of the SWM program of the municipality. Additional
revenues should, however, be realized in the Year 2020 so that no budget deficit will
be incurred. Continuous appropriation of excess budget for the succeeding years
can also ensure sustainable program implementation.
Year Total
Revenues Total Cost Excess/(Deficit)
2019 4,936 5,061 (125)
2020 6,894 5,311 1,584
2021 4,997 4,405 592
2022 5,527 2,564 2,963
2023 6,120 4,447 1,673
2024 6,786 4,283 2,502
2025 7,536 6,179 1,357

2026 8,383 7,330 1,053
2027 9,345 5,136 4,209
2028 10,440 5,158 5,282
TOTAL 70,963 49,874 21,089
Figure 11.2. Comparison of Cost and Revenues in Thousand Pesos
12,000
10,000
8,000
Revenues
6,000
Cost
4,000
2,000
-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

CHAPTER 12
Plan Implementation
12.1 PHASES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Phases of Plan Formulation and Program Implementation
The table below shows the different phases undergone during the formulation
of the plan until its implementation with the corresponding timelines and the
Office/Persons Responsible (OPR).
Table 12.1: Phases and Responsibilities

PHASES TIMELINE PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE
Plan Formulation
Organization and 2018 LCE
strengthening of the
MSWMB/TWG
Profiling/Conduct of 2018 MSWMB/TWG
Waste Analysis and
Characterization Study
(WACS)
Conduct of Workshops 2018 MSWMB/TWG
Crafting of the 10 Year 2018-2019 MSWMB/TWG
ESWM Plan
Public Consultation 2019 Sangguniang Bayan
Plan Legitimization 2019 Sangguniang Bayan
Approval by the NSWMC 2019 NSWMC
Plan Implementation
Conduct of Advocacy 2018-2028 MSWMB /TWG
Campaigns on Solid Waste
Management

Implementation of the 2019 – 2028 MENRO
Municipal SWM Program
Conduct of Monitoring Starting 2020 MSWMB/TWG
and Evaluation
Implementation of a Starting 2019 MSWMB/TWG
Incentives and Awards
program
12.2 MILESTONE
Institutional and Legal Aspects
Implementation of the municipal SWM plan jump-started after putting-in

place the following legal and institutional framework:
Table 12.2.1: Institutional and Legal Aspects

ACTIVITY DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION HIGHLIGTHS
1. Conduct of 2019 A public hearing was Issues and concerns
Public Hearing conducted to solicit raised by the
stakeholders’ comments, stakeholders were
inputs and approval. This adequately clarified
is to encourage active by the
participation and MSWMB/TWG.
commitment of the Likewise, the
community in the stakeholders’ inputs,
operationalization and comments and
implementation of the suggestions were
plan. also considered and
integrated in the
plan.
2. Final approval December A Resolution adopting the After three (3)
of the Plan 2019 10year ESWM Plan was readings, the
passed by the Sangguniang Bayan,
Sanggunian. finally adopted and
approved 10 year

Solid Waste Management System
The table below shows the various solid waste management activities as part
of the entire implementation process of the plan:
Table 12.2.2: Solid Waste Management System

ACTIVITY DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION HIGHLIGTHS
1. IEC Activities 2019- A massive information Orientation on the 10
onward drive was conducted to year Plan was done in
inform the constituents Barangay Assemblies
with SWM Programs and and other gatherings
activities of the in the municipality.
municipality Posters, flyers and
signages were set in
strategic and
conspicuous places
for easy access of
information by the
public.
2. Source 2019- Each household and Every household
Reduction 2028 business establishment practiced segregation
Activities was required four trash at source that
bins/ waste receptacles lessened the volume
used as temporary of waste disposed in
storage of wastes. the sanitary landfill.
3. Segregated 2019- To complement the The “No segregation
collection in 2028 efforts of the no collection policy”
each constituents to segregate was strictly
Barangay waste at source, the implemented wherein
Municipal collection only segregated
team collected residual and special
segregated wastes wastes shall be
accommodated in the
collection.

4. Establishment 2019 All barangays Functional MRFs
of MRFs and established a MRF as were established in
composting center for recycling and all Barangay of the
facilities composting. municipality. The
MRFs also served as
The Municipal MRF pick up points for the
served as center for Municipal collection
learning for barangays to of residual and
acquire experiential special wastes.
learning in the operation
and management of the
facility.
5. Establishment 2020 RA 9003 mandates that Category 1 sanitary
of Sanitary all Cities and landfill was
Landfill municipalities shall established. Facilities,
establish sanitary amenities and
landfill as the final structure constructed
disposal facility for Solid were in accordance
waste. with the guidelines
set by the NSWMC
and other concerned
agencies.

12. 3 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
To ensure the successful implementation of the Plan, various strategies and

activities using the major components of solid waste management shall be
implemented in the schedule below:
Table 12.3.1: Schedule of Implementation
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
P/P/As
Environmental Organization/Institutional
1. Establishments
of MENRO
Office
2. Forging of MOA
with the
junkshops
3. Close
coordination
with NGAs and
NGOs that
offers livelihood
training
programs
4. Organization of
ESWM Speakers
Bureau
Engineering
Component
1.Installation of
color-coded bins in
strategic areas

2. Establishment of
Municipal
Composter
3. Purchase of transport vehicle for municipal collection
Garbage
Compactor
Dump truck
Pedi cab/padyak
4.Repair and
Maintenance of
Municipal vehicles
and equipment
waste collection
5.Purchase of transport vehicle for recovery and processing
Shredder
Composter/Bio-
reactor
Generator set
6. Establishment of
Demo Farm
7. Adoption of
Alternative
Technology
8. Organic
Fertilizer
Production
9. Construction of
MRF

10. Repair and
Maintenance of
Municipal vehicles
and equipment
waste recovery and
processing
11. Purchase of
Service Vehicle
11.Purchase of
equipment on
disposal facility
like bulldozer,
backhoe, grader,
dump truck
12. Construction of
Category 1
Sanitary landfill &
other
facilities/utilities
13. Closure and

Rehabilitation of
Residual
Containment Area
(RCA)
Education
Component
1. Conduct of
Advocacy
Campaigns on
Solid Waste
Management

2. Orientation of
different
stakeholders
2.1. Capacity
building for
MSWMB/TWG
and BESWMC.
2.2. Training for

MRF Managers
and ESWM
Enforcers in the
barangay.
2.3. Orientation
of LGU officials
and employees
and Barangay
Officials.
2.4.Orientation
for applicants of
business
permits,
marriage &
other
clearances
3. Provision of
technical
assistance to
barangays on Solid
Waste
Management.
Enforcement
Component

1.Enactment of
appropriate
legislative
measures
2. Incentive and
award system
3. Implementation
of “No
Segregation No
Collection”
Policy
4. Monitoring and
Evaluation
5. Conduct of
monitoring and
evaluation on
program
implementation
6. Plan updating
Diversion goals and quantities

Based from the yearly projection of waste generated, the table shows a 54%
target waste diversion in the 1st year (2019), which is equivalent to 5,588.83kgs/day
of wastes diverted. On the 5th year (2022), target diversion will increase to 69%, and
about 83% waste diversion will be attained on the 10th year (2027) implementation
of the plan
Effective implementation of the municipality’s solid waste management will
lead to diversion of waste as enumerated hereunder:

Table 12.3.2: Summary of Diversion Goals and Quantities(kg/day)

Diversion Quantities of
Target Waste
Year Biodegradable Recyclable Total (Percentage) Diversion
2019 6200.05 1992.49 5,588.33

8,193 54.00%
2020 6299.92 2024.59 6098.97
8,325 58.00%
2021 6401.20 2057.14 6410.71
8,458 60.00%
2022 6504.42 2090.31 6948.36
8,595 64.00%
2023 6609.06 2123.94 7501.40
8,733 68.00%
2024 6715.47 2158.13 7734.26
8,874 69.00%
2025 6823.64 2192.90 7972.74
9,017 70.00%
2026 6933.41 2228.17 8216.72
9,162 71.00%
2027 7045.12 2264.07 8466.70
9,309 72.00%
2028 7619.39 2448.63 10068.02
10,068 79.16%
6715.17 2158.04 8,873.20 100% 7,500.62

Average
The result of the summary of diversion goals shall be obtained from table
4.5 Projected Waste Generation(kg/day), quantities for the volume of
biodegradable waste and recyclable waste per year in kg/day targeted through
percentage per year of diversion which starts from 2019 up to the tenth year of
the planning period to meet the mandate of waste diversion.

CONCLUSION
The Local Government of Santa Ana, Cagayan with the active participation
of all its constituents, commit to undertake all the methodologies and strategies
adopted in this 10-Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan. It will strictly
implement the policies regarding re-use, reduce and recycle of wastes generated
and impose the mandatory waste s segregation at source. It will pursue its
direction towards “ZERO WASTE MANAGEMENT” by adopting appropriate
alternative technologies.


10-Year Plan-Santa Ana (2019-2028) Final PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

10-Year Plan-Santa Ana (2019-2028) Final PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

10-YEAR ECOLOGICAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

One important step to address these issues is the Formulation of the

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 1

The officialdom of Santa Ana, Cagayan, Cagayan headed by Mayor Nelson P.

Initially, the municipal government through an Executive Order has created

In the plan formulation process, the following activities were undertaken:

 Familiarization with RA 9003 and other related environmental laws;

 Conducted series of write shops to formulate the plan.

The draft plan was presented to the MSWMB in a technical conference to

Different stakeholders have contributed relevant data in the formulation and

Table 1.1 Data Sources

Municipal Planning and - LGU Profile

Municipal Engineering Office - Details in the construction of

Municipal Budget Office - Cost Estimates / Financial

SB Office - Local Laws and Regulations on

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 3

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 4

2.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION

The Municipality of Santa Ana, a second-class municipality is situated in the

It has a single stretch of main coastal highway covering some 17 kilometers

Figure 2.1a Location Map

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 6

Figure 2.1b Location Map

In 1919, Felipe Agarpao with some settlers organized a “gimong” (meaning

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 7

A national road from Dugo, Camalaniugan to San Vicente (DSVR) was

In 1946, when Navarro was appointed Mayor of Gonzaga, he resumed his

Table 2.1 Current Population

Barangay 2015 Population

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 9

Table 2.2 Population Projection

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 10

Urbanization or the growth in the proportion of people living in urban areas

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 11

2.4 ECONOMIC PROFILE/LAND USE

Socio – economic Profile

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 12

Moreover, tourism is becoming a major source of income of the residents of

Table 2.3 Distribution of Geological Characteristics

Geological Characteristics Area(ha) % cover

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 13

Table 2.4. Existing General Land Use Classification

LAND USE AREA (HAS.) % OF TOTAL

Built-up area 452.00 1.02

TOTAL 44,130.00 100 %

Table 2.5 Urban Land Use Classification

URBAN LAND USES AREA (HA.) PERCENTAGE (%)

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 14

Figure 2.1 Existing Urban Land Use Map

Functional Classification of Road Network

For purposes of prioritizing maintenance and development of road network,

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 15

Major Transportation Routes and Facilities

2.5 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 16

B. Topography and Elevation

The general topographic characteristic of the municipality of Sta. Ana ranges

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 17

Table 2.7 Slope Classification

Slope (%) Land Area (Ha.) Percentage (%) Description

Figure 2.2 Slope Map

10- Year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan (2019-2028) 18