Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guía Didáctica de La Unidad
Guía Didáctica de La Unidad
Guía Didáctica de La Unidad
Número de la Unidad: 3
INTRODUCCIÓN:
Welcome to Unit 3, How do people learn? This has been an outstanding inquire for
most English Teacher, SLA students, and Language. Learning is a systematic process
without shortcuts, as well as time consuming. The theories involved in this complex
Behaviorists’ theories
subject or skill by study, experience, or instruction” (p.100). The first theories that can be
presented about this human feature are the Behaviorists. They belong to a time
understanding science was through the “scientific method”. This means that they only
studied the “publicly observable behavior”; In order words, scientific outcomes were
validated if they could be measured. In this field, the first working was Pavlov who
developed what was called the “Classical Conditioning” theory. The Learning process
consisted of “the formation of association between stimuli and reflexive responses”
(Brown, 2008). In other words, this man dedicated for a while to train his dog, so
whenever he gave it food, a bell rang. The dog got used to listening to the bell before
receiving the food and salivated. Thus, he conditioned the dog obtaining a response.
Another theory in this framework was posited by Thorndike who proved that “stimuli that
occurred after a behavior had influence in future behavior”. Finally, these theories
motivated Skinner who tried to explain human learning. He developed the operant
will be constantly used depending on the teacher reinforcement. This reinforcement can
be either positive or negative. Positive reinforcement will make input to go to the long-
term memory and negative will prevent the student from repeat it again.
Punishment was part of this theory, believe it or not, but he said “"works to the
This is another framework, in chapter 1 you realized that some people uncovered
that there were many flaws or unanswered questions, such as the abstract nature of
language. This means that language learning is not memorization. Students use a word
learned in a sentence, in the classroom, when they go outside, they use it in a novel
form. This motivated them to study other realm, such as competence instead of
behavior.
Ausubel tried to explain human learning in the following way. He said that
students should learn words, phrases, etc. in a systematic and organized form. He called
to this meaningful learning, which he contrasted with rote learning- isolated words that
are easily forgotten. For example, when someone asks a phone number and after a
couple of minutes this person forgets the number because this learning did not follow a
process.
In another words, both rote and meaningful learning represent retention. However, The
importance of this theory lies in the effectiveness of the learned material, as the
meaningful represents that this material goes to the long term-memory. Retention lasts
longer!
Systematic Forgetting
Our mind can be compared to a closet. Sometimes, we have article of clothing that
we do not use or fit well. For that reason, we give them away. What we do not use is
deleted because Ausuble express that learned materials are associated and last longer.
However, rote learned materials are forgotten as well as the knowledge that we do not
“Pruning is the elimination of unnecessary clutter and a clearing of the way for more
material to enter the cognitive field, in the same way that pruning a tree ultimately allows
Language attrition researchers with all these data expressed that forgetting or pruning is
systematic. This law is not only for second language but also for first language
acquisition
“Subsumption theory provides a strong theoretical basis for the rejection of conditioning
second language learning, mindless repetition, imitation, and other rote practices in the
Now we know that while learning a language, we must practice meaningfully. Learning a
second language is hard work!
Constructivist Theories
physically and cognitively, yet primarily emotionally. For him “the goal of education is
the facilitation of change and learning”. Learning how to learn is more important than
being taught”. Thus, he understood that English teachers must become “facilitators of
learning”. He believed that the classroom setting had to foster without levels, no
superiority. Teacher must deliver real classes. “Teachers need to communicate openly
The flaws of this educational environment is that they can become so soft that students
would not feel that they have to work. The facilitative tension can be lost, and programs
should have the right to negotiate their learning findings, cooperating in the classroom
to be involved in critical thinking. That learning material must be related with real life
activity.
Gagne wrote about eight learning, such as signal learning, stimulus-response learning,
learning. These learning are from lower level to higher levels of effectively internalizing
concepts.
Some concept that English teacher must know are transfer, interference and
overgeneralization.
from the exercises. Whereas, Deductive reasoning is when the teacher explains the rules
1. “Linguistic”
2. “Logical-mathematical”
3. “Musical”
4. “Spatial”
5. “Bodily-kinesthetic”
6. “Naturalist”
7. “Interpersonal”
8. “Intrapersonal intelligence”
OBJETIVO GENERAL:
1. Understand the main characteristics of the teaching and learning process in the
behavioral, cognitive and constructive approaches.
2. Know the differences between the Audiolingual Method and the Community
Language Learning.
OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS:
1. Identify the differences between classical conditioning and operant conditioning theory,
2. Identify the differences between rote and meaningful learning.
3. Identify the differences between transfer, interference and overgeneralization
4. Identify students’ multiple intelligences ability to improve EFL teaching.
5. Identify the differences between rote learning and meaningful learning to foster students’
leaning process ameliorating language systematic forgetting or pruning.
ORIENTACIONES GENERALES:
Los estudiantes al participar en el cursado deben tener en cuenta:
1. La asignatura tiene una duración de 16 semanas. Por tanto, deben desarrollar esta
primera unidad en el tiempo estipulado en el calendario. Lo normal es que cada
unidad tenga una duración de 14 días (dos semanas).
2. Cada unidad tendrá su guía didáctica, en la cual se establece los lineamientos
para su desarrollo, contenido, estrategias y actividades.
3. Es de suma importancia que se estudie cada uno de los aspectos que conforman
esta unidad para que puedan cumplir con los objetivos de esta.
4. Los plazos para el desarrollo de las asignaciones están establecidos, es
importante que los pueda cumplir colocándolas a tiempo en la plataforma, esto
favorece su propia organización y el desarrollo de todas las unidades de la
asignatura.
CONTENIDO A TRATAR:
1. Learning and Training
2. Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning
3. Skinner’s Operant Conditioning
4. Ausubel’s Subsumtion Theory
5. Rogers’s Humanistic Psychology
6. Types of Learning
7. Transfer, Interference, and Overgeneralization
8. Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
9. Language Aptitude
10. Intelligence and language Learning
11. Learning Theories in Action: The Audiolingual Method and Community Language
Learning
BIBLIOGRAFÍA CONSULTADA:
Universidad del Valle de México. (s.f.). Rubrica para evaluar resumen. Recuperada
de http://www.aulaz.org/CAST/WQ-CT-WT/WTMeme-S2-S3-
S4/Rubrica_Resumen.pdf
BIBLIOGRAFÍA RECOMENDADA:
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). United States:
Pearson Education
Brown, H. D. (2008). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). United States:
Pearson Education
Como escribir una reflexión. (s.f.) Recuperado de https://es.wikihow.com/escribir-un-
documento-de-reflexi%C3%B3n
WEBGRAFÍA
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). United States:
Pearson Education. Recuperado de https://epdf.tips/principles-of-language-learning-and-
teaching-5th-edition.html
EVALUACIÓN:
ACTIVIDADES DE APRENDIZAJE:
El foro de debate sobre la unidad. Esta actividad permitirá la interacción estudiante-
estudiantes a la vez que cuando el profesor de respuesta habrá una interacción profesor
estudiante. El profesor dará un seguimiento continuo al desarrollo de este grupo. Al final
como cierre del mismo, el docente elaborara una síntesis de todos los aspectos
debatidos en el foro proveyendo una evaluación cualitativa del desarrollo de esta
técnica. Esta asignatura está totalmente centrada en el estudiante, promoviendo la
autonomía y responsabilidad de los estudiantes, para ayudarlos a aprender a aprender.
De manera positiva se podrá observar como los estudiantes entre sí de manera
asincrónica trabajan la zona de desarrollo próximo de Vygotsky.
Control de la unidad. Esta forma de evaluación conductivista se utilizó para que los
estudiantes tengan una idea de manera cuantitativa de cómo fueron internalizados los
aprendizajes.
Rubrica parta la evaluación de la actividad individual Resumen de la Unidad
TOTAL 10 puntos
Rubrica adaptada de la UVM