Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Three Point Bending Test 1
Three Point Bending Test 1
Related terms:
In total, three CFST columns were tested including one square CFST column and two
circular CFST columns. Table 5.2 summarizes the experimental results of three-point
bending tests and their corresponding theoretical values calculated from theoretical
equations as given in the following [32]:
Column no. Cross-section Applied axial load Lateral load (kN) Error (%)
(kN)
Test Theoretical
TS1 Square (200- 514 168 181 7.7
mm×200 mm)
TC1 Circular (194- 414 95 96 0
mm diameter)
TC2 Circular (194- 0 88 109 19.2
mm diameter)
If , then
(5.1a)
Otherwise,
(5.1b)
where N is the applied axial load and is the designed axial load capacity:
(5.2)
in which
(5.3)
(5.4)
is the cross-sectional area of the CFST column; and are the cross-sectional areas
of the steel tube and the concrete, respectively.
and are the yield strength of the steel tube and the characteristic strength of the
concrete, respectively.
For both axially loaded specimen TS1 and TC1, the theoretical formulae can well
predict the experimental results, whereas for axial-load–free specimen TC2, the
theoretical prediction was 19.2% larger than the experimental results and this might
be due to variation of concrete strength.
Fig. 5.2 depicts the force–displacement histories of the three-point bending tests. It
is evident that the tested square specimen TS1 exhibited a larger lateral load capacity
than the circular specimen TC1 due to a larger plastic moment capacity. Also, the
axially loaded specimen TC1 showed slightly larger lateral load capacity but less
ductile behavior than its axial-load–free counterpart TC2.
The experimental data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s
multiple comparison method to determine the significance of observed differences
between sample means at the 95% confidence level ( = 0.05).
Figure 4.12. Results of the three-point bending tests performed: (A) Control speci-
men, (B) RM, (C) FM, (D) RFs, and (E) FFs.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Three point bending tests on 45 reinforced concrete beams had been planned at the
Department of Structural Engineering of the Politecnico di Torino. Ten beams were
cracked prior to loading due to the movement, so that only 35 beams have been really
tested. Three values of slenderness L/h= 6, 12, 18 (span to depth ratio) were taken
into account. The beams were subdivided into three series, according to the different
cross-sections: (A) 100×100 mm, (B) 100×200 mm and (C) 200×400 mm, while the
effective depth to total depth ratio d/h was equal to 0.9 (Fig.4). The beams were
reinforced only in tension with five different percentages: 0.12%, 0.25%, 0.50%,
1.00% and 2.00%. All the beams were cast from the same batch and no shear
reinforcement in the central part of the beams was provided.
Figure 4. Arrangement of reinforcement.
A closed-loop servo-controlled testing machine was used. The tests were performed
in displacement control for the beams with percentage of reinforcement larger than
0.50%, while for the others the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) control
was used, in order to avoid sudden failure in the event of snap-back phenomena
occurring. Top and bottom edge deformation were measured by means of poten-
tiometric transducers with gauges of length equal to the depth of the beam, placed
at 1/10 of the depth of the cross-section from both the beam extrados and intrados.
The transducers had a 20 mm measuring range, while vertical displacements were
measured by means of two transducers placed at midspan (Fig.5). Two additional
transducers were used to measure the settlements at the supports, so that the real
value of the midspan deflection was obtained by subtracting the average readings at
the supports from the average readings at midspan. The end supports consisted in
a fixed hinge and a roller enabling the beam to move horizontally, as shown in Fig.5.
The load was transferred onto the beams by means of a platen having a length equal
to half the beam depth and the same width in order to reduce stress concentration
effects.
The compressive strength of concrete was obtained from eight cubic specimens
measuring 100 mm in side and the average value fcm was 48.2 N/mm2. The
elastic modulus of concrete was determined from four specimens measuring
100×100×300 mm, which provided an average value equal to 35,000 N/mm2. The
fracture energy of concrete, determined according to RILEM recommendation [14]
on six specimens, presented an average value F equal to 0.115 N/mm. The critical
value of the stress-intensity factor can then be evaluated as:
(36)
The steel bars had nominal diameters of 5, 8, 16 and 20 mm, respectively. Originally,
the smallest bars should have a diameter of 4 mm; however from the post-mortem
analysis on the beams the effective diameter came out to be equal to 5 mm. For
this reason the percentages of reinforcement, reported in Table 1, are different from
the prefixed ones. The 5 mm bars did not exhibit a well-defined yield point and the
conventional yield limit, obtained from the stress-strain curve at 0.2% of permanent
deformation, was equal to 604 N/mm2. On the other hand, the yield strength for
the bars of 8, 16 and 20 mm, equalled 643 N/mm2, 518 N/mm2 and 567 N/mm2,
respectively. The geometrical characteristics and steel reinforcement percentages of
beams are reported in Table 1. The experimental setups and typical failure modes of
some characteristic beams, are reported in Figs. 6-13.
Three-point bending tests for CSR, creep, and fatigue for T400/3601 were conducted
where the span, width, and the thickness used in the tests are L = 50 mm, b = 15 mm,
and h = 2.7 mm, respectively.
The CSR tests were carried out at four deflection rates and 10 uniform temperatures
on an Instron type testing machine. A creep testing machine with a constant temper-
ature chamber was used to perform the creep tests at three uniform temperatures.
The fatigue tests were performed by using an electroservo-controlled hydrotesting
machine with a constant temperature chamber at various frequencies, temperatures,
and stress ratios.
Figure 8.8. Experimental setup. The three-point bending test has been performed
on a 200 kN hydraulic jack bending testing machine.
Figure 8.9. Loading procedure in two phases. (a) Phase 1: the beam is loaded up to
the crack initiation (15 kN). (b) The beam is loaded up to the failure (±50 kN).
Figure 10.17. Cross-sectional view of fractured three-point specimens. (a) (0/0/0) and
(b) (90/0/90).
With (90/0/90) lamination sequence, fracture mechanism was driven by 90° plies.
The presence of 90° plies at the outer surface ensured the interlaminar stresses at
90/0 interface due to the stiffness mismatch. In addition, the inherent weak links
of 90° plies to tensile loads triggered a matrix crack-induced failure on the bottom
ply during bending loading (Figure 10.17). Figure 10.16 shows the representative
flexural force–displacement curves of the specimens with and without nanofibrous
interlayers/interleafs. The initial load drop corresponds to the first ply failure due to
the critical matrix cracking on the bottom 90° ply subjected to tension. Note that the
local matrix failure did not cause the ultimate failure. Instead, a stable crack growth
characterized by the load drops was observed, and the final fracture occurred when
90 (degraded)/0 interface progressed to delamination. Hence, the overall flexural
performance was governed by two major failure mechanisms.
The increased resistance against initial matrix cracking may be noted by comparing
the first ply failure loads, whereas the delamination resistance of laminates may be
compared by the ultimate load values. It is clearly visible from Figure 10.16 that the
interlayer addition worked well for both mechanisms, as it was suggested for (0/0/0)
laminates.