Understanding SJ PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

MATERIAL MATTERS

Understanding steel joists


The Steel Joist Institute’s new CJ-Series
Composite Steel Joist catalog By David Samuelson, P.E.

T
he Steel Joist Institute (SJI)
is introducing the CJ-Series
Composite Steel Joists in
response to a growing need
to have a standard composite steel joist
specification for all SJI member compa-
nies. The recently published CJ-Series
catalog contains standard specifications
covering the Load and Resistance Fac-
tor Design (LRFD), manufacture, and
use of simply supported open-web
composite steel joists. Other sections
within the new CJ-Series catalog
include accessories and details, respon-
sibilities of the design professional,
code of standard practice, weight
tables and bridging tables for normal
weight (145 pcf ) and lightweight (110
Composite steel joists with a depth of 44 inches, spacing of 9 feet, and span of 60 feet provide a very
pcf ) concrete, composite joist design
efficient floor system at Owens and Minor Inc., in Atlee Station, Va. A concrete slab having a total
examples, and a composite joist floor depth of 6 inches is supported by the 3-inch composite steel deck.
design parameters checklist.

Definition of composite steel joists 50 ksi (345 MPa). Web sections are be required to follow the same design
The term “composite steel joists” based on a yield strength of at least 36 specifications.
refers to open-web, parallel chord, ksi (250 MPa), but not greater than 50
load-carrying members suitable for ksi (345 MPa). Applicable concrete Advantages of CJ-Series composite
direct support of one-way floor or roof strengths are either 4 ksi (27.6 MPa) steel joists
systems. Members may consist of hot- or 5 ksi (34.5 MPa). CJ-Series joists provide a number of
rolled or cold-formed steel, including advantages, including the following:
cold-formed steel whose yield strength History of composite steel joists • Reductions in overall floor-to-floor
has been attained by cold working. Hundreds of projects similar to the height of the structure.
CJ-Series joists are lightweight, shop- one shown above utilizing composite • Mechanical ducts and piping (see
manufactured steel trusses. Shear con- steel joists have been constructed Figure 2) can be run through the open
nection between the joist top chord across the United States and Canada webs of the CJ-Series joists instead
and overlying concrete slab allows the during the last 40 years. With SJI’s of running beneath the joist bottom
steel joist and slab to act together as recent standardization of a design chords. Specially designed panel
an integral unit after the concrete has method for composite steel joists (i.e., configurations and web openings can
adequately cured. Shear connection the CJ-Series), the structural engineer be provided when necessary.
typically consists of 3/8-, 1/2-, 5/8-, of record now has the assurance that • Maximum span-to-depth ratios of
or 3/4-inch- (9.5-, 12.7-, 15.9-, or multiple SJI member companies will L/30 permit the use of shallower
19-millimeter) diameter shear studs be able to provide composite steel joists joists for any given span.
welded through the steel deck to the for their specific projects. At the same • Larger spans result in larger column
top chord members of the underlying time, there will be greater consistency spacing, increasing useable floor space.
steel joist, as shown in Figure 1. between composite steel joist designs, • CJ-Series steel joists are very effi-
The design of CJ-Series joist chord as all SJI member companies approved cient, allowing a reduction in the
sections is based on a yield strength of to manufacture CJ-Series joists will joist weight for any given joist depth.

28 Structural Engineer DECEMBER 2007 www.gostructural.com


Lighter weight joists translate into composite joist bearing seats provide a = Mn /(0.85 f ′c be de ) ≤ tc , in. (mm)
potentially lighter weight columns negligible rotational restraint. There- (Equation 1)
and reduced foundation costs. fore, CJ-Series joists are modeled as
• Live-load deflections are significantly pin-ended members when manufac- de = dj – ybc + hdeck + tc – a/2, in. (mm)
reduced due to composite action. tured with the typical underslung bear- (Equation 2)
• Efficient erection of the CJ-Series ing seats. CJ-Series joists are cambered
joist system reduces construction for 100 percent of the non-composite where,
time. Wider joist spacing reduces dead load. This is in contrast to com- • a = depth of concrete compressive
the number of joists to be erected posite wide-flange beams where con- stress block, in. (mm)
and, when required, the number to nections at the ends of the beams may • be = effective width of concrete slab
be fireproofed. only permit approximately 85 percent over the joist, in. (mm)
of the camber to be removed under the • dj = steel joist depth, in. (mm)
Designations for CJ-Series full non-composite dead load. • f ′c = specified minimum 28-day con-
composite steel joists crete compressive strength, ksi (MPa)
The composite steel joist designa- Composite moment capacity theory • hdeck = height of steel deck, in. (mm)
tion is determined by its nominal The moment capacity of a compos- • Mn = nominal moment capacity of
depth, the letters “CJ” followed by ite steel joist can be calculated using the composite joist, kip-in. (N-mm)
the total factored uniform composite the simple model shown in Figure 3. • tc = thickness of concrete slab above
load, factored uniform composite live The distance between the centroid the steel deck, in. (mm)
load, and finally the factored uniform of the tension bottom chord and the • ybc = vertical distance to centroidal
composite dead load. For example, a centroid of the concrete compressive axis of bottom chord measured from
24CJ 1400/800/240 composite joist stress block, de , is computed using a the bottom of the bottom chord, in.
has a steel joist depth of 24 inches (610 concrete stress of 0.85f ′c and an effec- (mm)
mm), a total factored composite load- tive concrete width, be , taken as the
carrying capacity of 1,400 plf (20.4 sum of the effective widths for each The contribution of the steel joist
kN/m), a factored composite live-load side of the joist centerline, each of top chord to the moment capacity of
capacity of 800 plf (11.7 kN/m), and a which shall be the lowest value of the the composite system is ignored. The
factored composite dead-load capacity following: first top chord end panel member is
of 240 plf (3.5 kN/m). • one-eighth of the joist span, center- designed for the full-factored load
to-center of supports; requirements as a non-composite
Camber • one-half the distance to the center- member.
All CJ-Series composite steel joists line of the adjacent joist; and
are manufactured with camber. Typical • the distance to the edge of the slab. Mu ≤ φMn (Equation 3)

Figure 1 (left): Shear studs are welded through the steel deck to the top chord of the CJ-Series joist. Note that the shear studs are alternately installed on
both joist top chord angles. Figure 2 (right): The CJ-Series composite steel joists permit passage of HVAC, plumbing, and electrical conduit through the open
webs of the joist system. This makes it possible to reduce floor-to-floor heights.

www.gostructural.com DECEMBER 2007 Structural Engineer 29


MATERIAL MATTERS

Figure 4: The newly released First Edition Catalog


contains standard specifications for composite
steel joists, weight tables, bridging tables, and
code of standard practice.

Figure 3: Composite steel joist flexural model they have sufficient strength to trans-
fer the vertical shear from the applied
loads to the ends of the composite
where, • Ab = cross-sectional area of steel joist joist. The CJ-Series webs are designed
• φMn = minimum design flexural bottom chord, in.2 (mm2) for a minimum vertical shear equal to
strength of composite section as • An = net cross-sectional area of the 25 percent of the factored end reaction.
determined from Equations 4, 5, 6, steel joist bottom chord, in.2 (mm2) Conversely, all tension webs are also
and 7, kip-in. (N-mm) • be = effective width of concrete slab checked for stress reversals resulting
• Mu = required flexural strength over the joist, in. (mm) from a half-span live load applied to
determined from applied factored • de = vertical distance from the cen- the joist. Interior vertical web mem-
loads, kip-in. (N-mm) troid of steel joist bottom chord bers used in modified Warren-type
to the centroid of resistance of the joist configurations are designed to
The design flexural strength of concrete in compression, in. (mm) resist the gravity loads supported by
the composite section, φMn, shall be • Fu = tensile strength of the steel joist the member plus 2.0 percent of the
computed as the lowest value of the bottom chord, ksi (MPa) composite bottom chord axial force.
following limit states: Bottom Chord • Fy = specified minimum yield stress
Tensile Yielding, Bottom Chord Ten- of steel joist bottom chord, ksi Shear studs
sile Rupture, Concrete Crushing, and (MPa) Shear transfer between the concrete
Shear Connector Strength. • N = number of shear studs between slab and CJ-Series joist is typically
• Bottom Chord Tensile Yielding: the point of maximum moment and accomplished by installation of shear
φt = 0.90 zero moment studs welded through the steel deck
φMn = φt Ab Fy de (Equation 4) • Qn = Nominal shear capacity of one to the underlying steel joist top chord.
• Bottom Chord Tensile Rupture: shear stud, kips (N) The typical steel joist top chord con-
φtr = 0.75 • tc = minimum thickness of the con- sists of double angles with a horizontal
φMn = φtr An Fu de (Equation 5) crete slab above the top of the steel gap of 1 inch (25 millimeter) between
• Concrete Crushing: deck, in. (mm) chord angles, as shown in Figure 1.
φcc = 0.85 Shear studs are ideally installed so that
φMn = φcc 0.85f ′c be tc de (Equation 6) Web design requirements they are installed on alternating top
• Shear Connector Strength: Testing has verified that the web chord angles versus installing all shear
φstud = 0.90 members of a composite steel joist studs on the same top chord angle.
φMn = φstud NQn de ≥ 0.50φt Ab Fy de behave in the identical manner as web This will result in a more uniform
(Equation 7) members found within a non-compos- transfer of shear load into both joist
where, ite joist. Webs must be designed so that top chord angles.

30 Structural Engineer DECEMBER 2007 www.gostructural.com


The CJ-Series Standard Specifica- studs do not develop their full shear ity to meet serviceability and strength
tions provide a shear stud capacity capacity. To maximize chord efficiency, requirements.
table that conservatively assumes that the CJ-Series Standard Specifications To assist designers with design and
all shear studs are placed on the “weak” limits the shear stud diameter/flange selection of composite steel joists, the
side of the steel deck center stiffening thickness to a maximum of 3.0, but Steel Joist Institute recently published
rib, i.e., on the side of the deck stiffen- requires a reduction in the shear stud the First Edition Catalog for the CJ-
ing rib closest to the point of maximum capacity when the ratio falls between Series that contains standard specifica-
bending moment for the joist span. This 2.7 and 3.0. tions for composite steel joists, weight
being the case, one does not need to be tables, bridging tables, and code of
concerned as to which side of the deck Conclusion standard practice, as shown in Fig-
center stiffening rib the shear studs are Composite steel joists facilitate ure 4. A copy of this catalog can be
being welded. The definition of “weak” the routing of HVAC ducts, plumb- obtained from the SJI’s website at
and “strong” shear stud position can be ing, and electrical conduits through www.steeljoist.org or by contacting the
found in the 2005 AISC Commentary the open webs of the joists, thereby SJI office.
on the Specification for Structural allowing reductions in the overall
Steel Buildings, Fig. C-I3.4. floor-to-floor height. Building tenants
Prior testing of shear studs on thin value the increased flexibility available
David Samuelson, P.E., is chairman
flanges (G.G. Goble, “Shear Strength for laying out floor plans unhindered
of the Steel Joist Institute’s Composite Steel
of Thin Flange Composite Speci- by closely spaced columns. Composite Joist Committee and manager of Nucor’s
mens,” AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. steel joists have been extensively stud- Research and Development for Downstream
5, No. 2, April 1968) indicated that ied during the last 40 years. Current Products Department. He can be contacted
when the ratio of the diameter of the design practices allow the accurate at dsamuelson@nucor-rd.com.
stud/flange thickness exceeds 2.7, shear prediction of the load-carrying capac-

www.gostructural.com DECEMBER 2007 Structural Engineer 31

You might also like