Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ratio Analysis of ORION PHARMA LTD: An Assignment On
Ratio Analysis of ORION PHARMA LTD: An Assignment On
Ratio Analysis of ORION PHARMA LTD: An Assignment On
on
Ratio analysis of ORION PHARMA LTD
1
Managerial finance
Submitted By:-
Group
UDDIPON
Intake:-45
Section:-05
Program:-BBA
Submitted To:-
Md. Parvez Uddin
Assistant Professor
Chairman
Department of finance
Bangladesh University of Business and Technology
2
Group
UDDIPON
Intake:-45
Section:-05
Program:-BBA
3
Table of content
02. Analysis
Current ratio 12
Quick Ratio 13
Inventory turnover 14
Debt ratio 17
Return on equity 24
4
Executive summary
The liquidity position of the firm is moderate similar as most of the industry. The firm is more
efficient in using its asset than most of the firm in the industry. The firm is taking more financial
risk. Roe of the firm is moderate like as industry average. This moderate Roe of the firm may be
caused by liquidity position, better utilization and high financial risk. The firm should be concern
about high financial risk.
5
Company overview
6
ORION GROUP is one of the leading industrial conglomerates in Bangladesh over the years.
With the support of a highly skilled management structure and 18000 dedicated professionals,
ORION has achieved a degree of success that is unparalleled in the country’s business history.
ORION has assumed the leadership role with its operations in the Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics &
Toiletries, Infrastructure Development, Real Estate & Construction, Power, High-tech Agro
Products, Hospitality, Textiles & Garments, Aviation Management sectors. Some of the units are
successfully listed in the Stock Exchange.
7
Corporate Information
Listing Status: Listed with Dhaka Stock Exchange and Chittagong Stock
Exchange
8
Bankers: Agrani Bank Limited
AB Bank Limited
Analysis
1) CURRENT RATIO:-
Current Ratio
3.53.41
3 2.82
2.5
2.23
2
Ratio
1.5
0.5
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: The current ratio of the company decrease from 3.41 in 2016 to 2.23 in 2017,this
indicate that the capacity of the company to meet up short term obligation decrease over the year.
then increase from 2.23 in 2017 to 2.82 in 2018,the indicates that the capacity of the firm to meet
up short term obligation increase over the year.
2) QUICK RATIO:-
10
Particulars Year Year Year
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Current assets 5,800,753,696 6,054,170,090 6,795,570,490
Inventory 299,,950,084 274,461,441 271,925,189
Current liabilities 1,700,032,273 2,727,997,327 2,976,759,470
Ratio 3.24 0.12 2.19
Quick Ratio
3.5
3.24
2.5
2.19
2
Ratio
1.5
0.5
0.12
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: The quick ratio of the company decrease from 2.24 in 2016 to 2.19 in 2018.This
indicates that the capacity of the company to meet up short term obligation decrease over the
year.
3) INVENTORY TURNOVER:-
11
Cost of goods sold 1,088,516,230 885,154,503 873,436,617
Inventory 299,,950,084 274,461,441 271,925,189
Ratio 3.63 3.23 3.21
Inventory Turnover
3.7
3.63
3.6
3.5
3.4
Ratio
3.3
3.23
3.21
3.2
3.1
3
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: The inventor turnover of the company decrease over the years from 3.63 in 2016 to
3.21 in 2018.This indicates that the company has less investment over the year.
12
Days of the year 366 365 365
Collection period 713 days 938 days 1,020 days
ACP
1200
1020
1000 938
800
713
600
Days
400
200
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: The ACP of the company increase over the year from 713 days in 2016 to 1020 days
in 2018. This indicates that the firm less efficient in collecting account receivable.
13
Total asset turnover
0.18
0.16
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.12
0.1 0.09
Ratio
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: The total asset turnover of the company decrease over the year from 0.16 in 2016 to
0.09 in 2018.This indicates that the company less efficiency is using asset to generate sales.
6) DEBT RATIO: -
14
Debt Ratio
0.35
0.3 0.29
0.25 0.23
0.2
Ratio
0.16
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment The debt ratio of the company increased over the years from 0.16 in 2016 to 0.29 in
2018. These indicate that the company is taking more financial risk over the year.
15
TIER
2.5
2.2
2 1.89
1.5 1.39
Ratio
0.5
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Times interest earned ratio of the company decreased over the years from 2.2 in 2016
to 1.39 in 2018. These indicate that the company to meet up contractual interest expenses are low
over the year.
16
GPM
0.6
0.56 0.56 0.56
0.5
0.4
0.3
Ratio
0.2
0.1
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Gross profit ratio of the company near close over the years 2016 to 2018 which is
0.56. These indicate that gross profit against sales earned close ratio over the years.
17
OPM
0.25
0.2 0.2
0.2
0.16
0.15
Ratio
0.1
0.05
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Operation profit margin ratio of the company decreased over the years from 0.198 in
2016 to 0.16 in 2018. These indicate that EBIT against sales decreased over the years.
18
NPM
0.180.17
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1 0.09
Ratio
0.08
0.06
0.04 0.04
0.02
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Net profit margin ratio of the company decreased over the years from 0.17 in 2016 to
0.037 in 2017 than increased from 0.037 in 2017 to 0.09 in 2018 These indicate that EACS
against sales moderate over the years.
19
EPS
2
1.81.75
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
Ratio
0.8 0.72
0.6
0.4 0.32
0.2
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Earning per ratio of the company decreased over the years from 1.75 in 2016 to 0.32
in 2017 than increased from 0.32 in 2017 to 0..72 in 2018 These indicate that EACS against No
of share near moderate over the years.
20
RTA
10 9.43
9
5
Ratio
4.58
1
0.03
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Return on total assets ratio of the company increased over the years from 0.026 in
2016 to 9.43 in 2018. These indicate that EACS against total assets increased over the years
21
Current Ratio
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
Ratio
0.02 0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Year
Comment: Earning per ratio of the company decreased over the years from 0.031 in 2016 to
0.0056 in 2017 then increased from 0.0056 in 2017 to 0.013 in 2018 These indicate that EACS
against total common stock near moderate over the years.
22
Findings and recommendation
23
Liquidity-The liquidity position of the firm is moderate similar as most of the industry.
Using asset -The firm is more efficient in using its asset than most of the firm in the
industry.
Financial position-The firm is taking more financial risk. Roe of the firm is moderate like
as industry average. This moderate Roe of the firm may be caused by liquidity position,
better utilization and high financial risk. The firm should be concern about high financial
risk.
24