Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Empower Erie's Reply To Sen. Scarnati's Answer and Protest To App To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
Empower Erie's Reply To Sen. Scarnati's Answer and Protest To App To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
Empower Erie's Reply To Sen. Scarnati's Answer and Protest To App To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
:
IN RE: :
:
APPLICATION OF ERIE COUNTY : Docket No. 2019-001
SEEKING TO ESTABLISH A :
COMMUNITY COLLEGE :
:
Intervenor Empower Erie, LLC (hereinafter “Empower Erie”), by and through its
undersigned counsel, hereby files this Reply to Intervenor Senator Joseph Scarnati, III’s
Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion to Strike Proposed Supplement. As outlined infra, the
permit the State Board of Education (hereinafter the “Board”) to accept the evidence proffered
by Empower Erie via its Application to Supplement Hearing Exhibits. Said evidence speaks
directly to the merits of these proceedings and the acceptance of the same into the record will not
In further response to Scarnati’s Answer, Protest, and Motion to Strike, Empower Erie
avers as follows:
1. Denied. Answering further, on January 27, 2020, the State Board of Education’s
Ad Hoc Committee on the Erie County Community College Plan Hearing (hereinafter the “Ad
Hoc Committee”) issued an Order, directing the parties to this matter that “[a]ll documentary
{L0883374.2}
evidence intended to be presented at the hearing on March 18, 2020, shall be pre-marked and
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. This paragraph refers to regulations that speak for themselves. It is also denied
that the regulations cited are applicable to Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Hearing
Exhibits or the Erie Regional Chamber and Growth Partnership’s (hereinafter the “ERCGP”)
Report, entitled Erie County’s 21st Century Plan to Effectively Grow the Talent Pipeline
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Erie County submitted its expert reports as
required by the Ad Hoc Committee’s January 27, 2020 Order. It is denied that Intervenors the
Norther Pennsylvania Regional College (hereinafter the “NPRC”) and Scarnati timely submitted
expert reports.
10. Admitted.
11. Admitted.
12. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Empower Erie filed its Application to
Supplement Hearing Exhibits on May 18, 2020. That document, however, speaks for itself.
13. Admitted.
{L0883374.2} 2
14. Denied as stated. It is admitted, upon information and belief, that the ERCGP
Report was the result of an independent study commissioned entirely outside of this process by
the ERCGP pursuant to its own organizational objectives under the direction of its President and
CEO, James Grunke (hereinafter “Grunke”). It is further admitted that two representatives of the
NPRC (Aldo Jackson and Mary Bula) were members of a steering committee formed relative to
the study and had some level of participation therein, including reviewing a draft iteration of the
ERCGP Report. It is also admitted, upon information and belief, that the NPRC was aware of
the ERCGP study and the report’s commissioning, as both an executive-level employee and
member of its Board of Trustees participated in the creation of the ERCGP Report.
15. This paragraph contains both a prayer for relief and a conclusion of law to which
no responses are required. To the extent that the averments of this paragraph are determined to
16. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Erie County concurred with and joined in the
that Empower Erie was required to seek the concurrence of either the NPRC or Scarnati prior to
17. Admitted. Answering further, the ERCGP Report was not referenced in
Empower Erie’s Application to Amend its Pre-Hearing Statement because it did not yet exist at
18. Denied. Answering further, the ERCGP Report is not an expert report prepared
by Empower Erie for purposes of this matter. Rather, the ERCGP Report was produced pursuant
to a wholly independent and unrelated study commissioned by the ERCGP, the results of which
are instructive in this proceeding and speak directly to the statutory determinations the State
{L0883374.2} 3
Board of Education must make in its final adjudication of Erie County’s Application for a
Community College. More specifically, the ERCGP Report is vital to demonstrate Erie
County’s existing and prospective need for a community college – a principal question before
this Board for resolution. 24 P.S. § 19-1902-A(d). The ERCGP Report is a compilation of the
most current and comprehensive data that speaks to Erie County’s urgent need for additional
19. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the Report’s author was not listed as a
witness for the same reason that the ERCGP Report was not previously identified as an exhibit –
the Report was not yet finished, and Empower Erie and Erie County were not even aware of the
commissioning of the study at the time Pre-Hearing Statements were due to be filed in this
matter. Additionally, Empower Erie has already indicated that the Report’s author, Debra
Lyons, will be made available to testify during the hearing should this Board deem her testimony
necessary. Grunke, as the President and CEO of the ERCGP, can and will testify as to details of
the study the ERCGP commissioned, and the results of that study, in his capacity as a fact
witness.
20. Denied. For the reasons already stated herein, the ERCGP Report is not an expert
further response.
22. Denied. Answering further, the averments of this paragraph constitute an “apples
to oranges” comparison. Scarnati failed to timely submit his expert report in compliance with
the Ad Hoc Committee’s January 27, 2020 Order in this matter. It is further denied that said
{L0883374.2} 4
23. This paragraph contains neither factual averments nor conclusions of law.
Consequently, no response is required. Answering further, Empower Erie has merely identified
new evidence as an exhibit for purposes of this hearing that only become available after the
deadlines imposed by this Board as well as a potential authentication witness to the extent her
24. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the identification of the Report is beyond the
deadline set forth in the Ad Hoc Committee’s January 27, 2020 Order. It is denied that the
January 27, 2020 Order addressed evidence that did not exist at the time of the Order’s deadline.
There is nothing under GRAPP, or set forth in any Order issued by this Board, that prohibits a
party from offering new evidence at the time of hearing, or this Board from accepting the same.
the truth of the averments of this paragraph. Consequently, there are denied. Answering further,
Intervenors Scarnati and the NPRC are aligned in mission in this matter and have acted in
assume the NPRC is sharing information with Scarnati. Empower Erie also notes that, in his
response, Scarnati does not affirmatively state whether he knew of the existence of the study or
the ERCGP Report prior to the filing of Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Exhibits.
26. Denied as stated. Empower Erie’s assertions are set forth in its Application to
Supplement Exhibits – a document that speaks for itself. Any characterization of those
without information sufficient to determine whether and to what extent the NPRC objected to the
contents of the Report and its basis for the same. The NPRC is free to testify as to any
objections it had, and the basis for those objections, during the hearing.
{L0883374.2} 5
27. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the Report states the following as its first of
workforce to support Erie County’s economic growth.” Answering further, the Report also
states, “[a] new public community college in Erie would be transformational and a stake in the
ground for a community that is working hard on several fronts to propel itself toward a new level
of economic prosperity.” The ERCGP Report further concluded, “Erie cannot achieve this
economic success without creating upward mobility opportunities for its workforce and
increasing their skill sets that align with the needs of the County’s diverse business sectors.” It is
specifically denied that “there was virtually no data to support such recommendation” as Scarnati
alleges. It is also denied that there is anything suspicious about the ERCGP Report or its
findings.
28. Denied as stated. It is admitted, upon information and belief, that the final
ERCGP Report as submitted differed significantly than the draft report based, in large part, upon
the feedback received from the steering committee members, including the NPRC
representatives, and upon further review by Garner Economics. Upon information and belief,
the recommendation in the Report for the establishment of a brick and mortar community college
in Erie County did not change and appeared in both the draft version, and the final version, of the
ERCGP Report.
29. Denied. Empower Erie is without information adequate to determine what the
NPRC participants’ positions were vis-à-vis the ERCGP Report at the time they reviewed the
draft of the same. Consequently, the averments of this paragraph are denied.
30. Denied as stated. The ERCGP Report is a written document that speaks for itself.
What it does conclude is that a brick and mortar community college is needed in Erie County. If
{L0883374.2} 6
the conclusions of the study were that the NPRC was adequately serving the higher education
needs of Erie County, the ECGP Report would have said so.
31. Denied. Answering further, Empower Erie was under no obligation to make any
advanced notation of evidence that did not previously exist. Rather, Empower Erie obtained a
copy of the Report, and, after having had reasonable opportunity to review and determine
whether it was relevant to these proceedings, Empower Erie acted in a timely manner in filing its
Application with this Board following the Report’s issuance on or about May 4, 2020.
32. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that Empower Erie filed an
Application to Amend its Pre-Hearing Statement on or about February 19, 2020 to include James
Grunke as a fact witness. It is denied that creates any presumption that Empower Erie knew that
a report had been, or was in the process of being prepared, and would be finalized in May of
2020.
33. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Empower Erie did not mention the Report in
its February Application to this Board because the Report did not exist at that time of that
document’s filing. It is also denied that Empower Erie was required to reserve the right to
submit new evidence in any pre-hearing submission. Rather, this Board has the discretion to
consider new evidence at the time of hearing under GRAPP. See, e.g. 1 Pa. Code § 31.2.
{L0883374.2} 7
WHEREFORE, Empower Erie respectfully requests that this Board 1) deny Senator
Joseph Scarnati, III’s Protest to Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Hearing Exhibits;
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
David C. Hittinger, Jr., Esquire
Attorney ID No. 202495
Mark S. Stewart, Esquire
Attorney ID No. 75958
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC
213 Market St., 8th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101
nhittinger@eckertseamans.com
mstewart@eckertseamans.com
Telephone: (717) 237-6000
Facsimile: (717) 237.6019
{L0883374.2} 8
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
:
IN RE: :
:
APPLICATION OF ERIE COUNTY : Docket No. 2019-001
SEEKING TO ESTABLISH A :
COMMUNITY COLLEGE :
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this ___ day of _______________, 2020, upon consideration of Intervenor
Empower Erie, LLC’s Reply to Intervenor Senator Joseph Scarnati, III’s Answer and Protest to
Intervenor Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion to Strike
Proposed Supplement, it is hereby ORDERED that the Protest and Motion to Strike are
DENIED.
By the Board:
____________________________
{L0883374.2}
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a copy of the foregoing Reply upon the persons
and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements Pa.R.A.P. 121.
{L0883374.2}