Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Erie County's Answer To NPRC's Objection To Application To Supplement Hearing Exhibits of Empower Erie
Erie County's Answer To NPRC's Objection To Application To Supplement Hearing Exhibits of Empower Erie
IN RE:
Erie County, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this Answer to
Supplement Hearing Exhibits of Intervenor Empower Erie, LLC (“Objection”) and in support
1. Admitted.
2. This paragraph does not contain any factual averments that require a response. In
further answer, Erie County submits that there is no valid basis for NPRC’s objection.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Denied as stated. The relevant considerations for this Board are stated in Article
report speaks towards the unmet need for post-secondary education and workforce training in
Erie County, which is not adequately served by established institutions of higher learning, and
which can be most appropriately met by the establishment of a bricks and mortar public
community college.
9. Denied. The inquiry before this Board is whether Erie County’s Plan meets the
requirements of Article XIX-A of the Public School Code, one of which is whether there is an
unmet need in Erie County that is not adequately served by established institutions of higher
learning. The training and education of the population to enter into the workforce is at the core
of higher education.
10. Denied. The report speaks for itself as to the process undertaken, and the research
involved, in reaching the conclusions set forth therein, which include a need for a bricks and
mortar community college in Erie County. In further answer, the report was identified promptly
after it was issued. Empower Erie could not identify as an exhibit a report before it existed.
11. Denied as stated. Empower Erie simply pointed out in its Application that NPRC
has two representatives serving on the steering committee that assisted in the study resulting in
the report, and therefore had knowledge of its existence, eliminating any argument that NPRC
12. This paragraph does not contain any factual averments that require a response.
13. Denied as stated. The report was not finalized until May 4, 2020. NPRC is well
aware of that fact, as it had two representatives sitting on the steering committee that participated
in the study, including reviewing the initial draft of the report and providing comments on same
2
14. Denied. Erie County is without information sufficient to determine the truth of
15. Denied. Erie County is without information sufficient to determine the truth of
the averments of this paragraph, and therefore denies same. In further answer, the report is not a
survey, but a study. The report speaks for itself as to its conclusions, and the basis for same.
This Board can determine for itself the weight to afford to those conclusions, but should have the
further response.
17. Denied. The final report concludes that there is a need for a bricks and mortar
community college that NPRC is not meeting. NPRC’s educational offerings were considered
18. Denied as stated. Empower Erie’s Application speaks for itself, and NPRC’s
characterization of same is specifically denied. In further answer, Ms. Bula was a member of the
steering committee for the study that produced the report, which NPRC admits.
19. Denied as stated. It is denied that Empower Erie’s Application was misleading in
any regard. In further answer Ms. Bula was a member of the steering committee and had some
involvement with regard to the report. Erie County does not know what specific role that Ms.
Bula played with regard to the report, aside from what the report itself states. Erie County
20. Denied. Erie County is without knowledge sufficient to determine the truth of the
averments this paragraph, and therefore must deny same. In further answer, whether or not Ms.
3
Bula or Mr. Jackson had a copy of the final report prior to the filing of Empower Erie’s
application should have no bearing on whether the report should be considered by this Board.
21. Denied. The report contains conclusions and recommendations, one of which is
that Erie County needs a bricks and mortar community college. There is nothing inaccurate or
22. This paragraph contains only conclusions of law that require no response. In
further answer, and to the extent that NPRC is stating or implying that the report is not relevant
to the matters before this Board, the averment is denied. To the contrary, the report speaks
directly to the whether the local sponsor (Erie County) is not adequately served by established
institutions of higher education; one of the very elements that NPRC states in its Objection is a
24. Erie County incorporates by reference its answer to paragraph 22. In further
answer, Erie County agrees that this Board has broad discretion to admit evidence in this
administrative proceeding.
25. Denied. The report speaks directly to the whether the local sponsor (Erie County)
is not adequately served by established institutions of higher education, from the perspective of
the business, manufacturing and industrial sectors. This is one of the very elements that NPRC
26. Denied. It is denied that Empower Erie’s Application was misleading in any way
or purported to use the report for any improper purpose. Empower Erie’s Application (which
itself is not evidence), merely indicated its request to add the report to its list of exhibits for the
4
hearing, and to explain the timing and basis for that request. Erie County incorporates by
27. Denied. This paragraph contains conclusions of law that require no response. In
further answer, the case cited by NPRC addresses the evidentiary rules applicable to court
proceedings — not administrative hearings. Finally, to the extent that NPRC is suggesting that it
has suffered from unfair surprise, that suggestion is denied. The report was only finalized at the
beginning of May, 2020. Additionally, NPRC cannot be surprised by a report that they knew
28. Admitted.
29. Denied as stated. The role of the hearing examiner is set forth in 1 Pa. Code
30. Denied as stated. It is admitted that this Board has the discretion to determine the
admissibility of evidence for this proceeding. It is denied that the proposed exhibit has been
untimely proffered as (1) the hearing has not commenced; (2) the exhibit is newly discovered
evidence from a third party that was not in the possession of Empower Erie or Erie County prior
to May 4, 2020; (3) the exhibit bears directly upon the matters before this Board; (4) the exhibit
report (and the study that preceded it) was commissioned by an independent third party in the
furtherance of its own mission, and not for the purposes of this hearing; and (5) NPRC had some
31. Denied. The report is not an expert report of any party to this proceeding. To the
contrary, the report is the result of a third party commissioned study and provides relevant data
that this Board should consider when evaluating Erie County’s Plan. For the reasons stated
above, the report has been timely identified, given that it was only recently issued and made
5
available. This Board should not be denied the opportunity to hear from the Erie County
WHEREFORE, Erie County respectfully requests that this Board deny Intervenor
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing