Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Erie County's Reply To Scarnati's Answer and Protest To Empower Erie's Application To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
Erie County's Reply To Scarnati's Answer and Protest To Empower Erie's Application To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
Erie County's Reply To Scarnati's Answer and Protest To Empower Erie's Application To Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion To Strike Proposed Supplement
IN RE:
Erie County, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this Reply to
Intervenor Joseph Scamati, Ill’s (hereinafter “Scarnati”) Answer and Protest to Intervenor
Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion to Strike Proposed
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Erie County timely submitted its expert
reports as required by this Board in it’s the January 27, 2020 Order issued by the Ad Hoc
Committee. It is denied that Intervenors NPRC and Scamati timely submitted an expert report.
10. Admitted.
11. Admitted.
Supplement Hearing Exhibits on or about the date stated. That filing speaks for itself as to its
contents.
14. Denied as stated. It is admitted, upon information and belief, that the Report was
the result of a study commissioned by the ERCGP pursuant to its own mission, and under James
Grunke’s direction, independent of this hearing and/or the Erie County Community College
application, which study was concluded with the issuance of the Report on or about May 4,
2020. It is further admitted, upon information and belief, that two representatives of NPRC
(Aldo Jackson, and Mary Bula) were members of a steering committee formed for purposes of
the study, and had some level of participation in the study, including the review of the draft
report. It is finally admitted, upon information and belief, that NPRC was aware of the study,
and the Report, as a result of the participation of its two representatives on the steering
committee.
15. Denied. This Board should not preclude Empower Erie or the County from
introducing the Report during the hearing in this matter. The Report was not prepared for
purposes of this hearing, and consequently is not in the nature of an expert report. Moreover, the
Report was only issued in final form on or about May 4, 2020, and consequently, was not
2
available at the time of the submission of the Pre-Trial Statements in February, or the submission
of exhibits in March. Finally, neither Erie County nor Empower Erie were even aware of the
existence of the Report until after the time period for the submission of Pre-Trial Statements and
hearing exhibits.
16. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Erie County concurred in the filing of
Empower Erie’s Application. It is denied that the applicable rules of procedure required
Empower Erie to seek the concurrence of any party prior to its filing.
17. Admitted. In further answer, the Report was not referenced in Empower Erie’s
February 19, 2020 Application to Amend its Pre-Hearing Statement because the Report did not
18. Denied. The Report is not an expert report prepared by a party for purposes of a
hearing, and consequently the cited regulations do not apply. To the contrary, the Report is the
proceeding, the results of which bear directly upon the issues before this Board - whether there
is an unmet higher educational need in Erie County, offered from the perspective of the business,
19. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the Report’s author is not listed as a witness,
for the very same reason that the Report was not identified as an exhibit - the report was not yet
prepared, and Empower Erie and the County were not even aware of the commissioning of the
study at the time the Pre-Hearing Statement was filed. Empower Erie has already indicated that
the Report’s author will be made available during the hearing, should this Board believe it
necessary and appropriate. James Grunke, as the CEO of the entity that commissioned the
Report, can certainly speak to the study that was commissioned, and what the results of that
3
study were, in his capacity as a fact witness. This Board should not ignore relevant data bearing
on the issues before this Board merely because it only recently became available.
20. Denied. The Report is not an expert report, for the reasons already stated herein,
21. Denied as stated. Erie County incorporates by reference its answer to paragraph
21 in further response.
22. Denied. There is no irony at play here. Intervenor Scamati failed to timely
submit his expert report (which was or should have been available to him) as directed by the
Order of the Ad Hoc Committee, and then attempted to circumvent that deadline by filing his
expert’s report as written testimony. In contrast, Empower Erie timely submitted its application
to identify after discovered evidence, once that evidence came into existence, and became known
to it.
23. This paragraph does not contain any averment of fact, and therefore no response
is required. In further answer, Empower Erie has sought to identify as an exhibit for purposes of
the hearing newly discovered evidence that only become available after the deadlines imposed
by this Board, and a potential authentication witness to the extent deemed necessary by this
24. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the identification of the Report is beyond the
deadline set forth in the Ad Hoc Committee’s January 27, 2020 order. It is denied that the Order
addressed after discovered evidence. There is nothing under the applicable rules of procedure,
or set forth in any Order issued by this Board, that blanketly prohibits a party from offering
newly discovered evidence at the time of hearing, or this Board from accepting such evidence.
4
25. Denied as stated. Erie County is without information sufficient to determine the
truth of the averments of this paragraph, and therefor denies same. In further answer, Intervenors
Scarnati and NPRC have acted in concert throughout these proceedings, and consequently, Erie
County presumes that NPRC is sharing information it has with Intervenor Scarnati. Erie County
notes that in his response, Intervenor Scarnati does not affirmatively state whether he knew of
the existence of the study or the Report prior to the filing of Empower Erie’s Application.
26. Denied as stated. Empower Erie’s assertions are set forth in its Application,
which is a document that speaks for itself. Any characterization of those assertions by
Intervenor Scarnati are specifically denied. After reasonable investigation, Erie County is
without information sufficient to determine whether and to what extent NPRC objected to the
contents of the Report and the basis for same. NPRC is free to testify as to any objections it had,
and the basis for same, during the hearing. Erie County has no objection to NPRC amending its
witness list to include one or more fact witnesses to address its involvement on the steering
committee, and any input it may have had vis-a-vis the Report.
27. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the Report states the following as its first of
workforce to support Erie County’s economic growth. In further answer, the Report further
states that “[a] new public community college in Erie would be transformational and stake a
ground for a community that is working hard on several fronts to propel itself toward a new level
of economic prosperity;” and that “Erie cannot achieve this economic success without creating
upward mobility opportunities for its workforce and increasing their skill sets that align with the
needs of the County’s diverse business sectors.” It is denied that “there was virtually no data to
5
support such recommendation” as alleged. It is denied that there is anything suspect about the
28. Denied as stated. It is admitted, upon information and belief, that the final Report
as submitted differed significantly than the original draft report, based upon the feedback
received from the steering committee members, and further review by Garner Economics.
Upon information and belief, the recommendation in the Report for the establishment of a bricks
and mortar community college in Erie County did not change, and appeared in both the draft
29. Denied. Erie County is without information sufficient to determine what the
NPRC participants’ positions were vis-a-vis the Report at the time they reviewed the draft of
30. Denied as stated. The Report speaks for itself- and what it states is that a bricks
and mortar community college is needed in Erie County. If the conclusions of the study were
that NPRC was adequately serving that need, the Report would have stated so. It did not.
31. Denied as stated. Erie County is without information sufficient to determine the
factual averments of this paragraph, and therefore must deny same. In further answer, Empower
Erie had no obligation to raise the existence of the Report until it was finalized, Empower Erie
obtained a copy of the Report, and had a reasonable opportunity to review and determine
whether it was relevant to these proceedings. Empower Erie acted timely in filing its
Application to this Board following the Report’s issuance on or about May 4, 2020.
32. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that Empower Erie filed an
Application to Amend its Pre-Hearing Statement on or about February 19, 2020 to include James
Grunke as a fact witness. It is denied that creates any presumption that Empower Erie knew that
6
a report had been, or was in the process of being prepared, and would be finalized in May of
2020.
33. Denied as stated. It is admitted that Empower Erie did not mention the Report in
its February Application to this Board, as the Report did not exist at that time. It is likewise
denied that Empower Erie was required to reserve the right to submit after discovered evidence
in any pre-hearing submission. This Board has the discretion to consider newly discovered
WHEREFORE, Erie County requests that this Board deny Intervenor Joseph Scamati’s
Protest to Intervenor Empower Erie’s Application to Supplement Hearing Exhibits and Motion to
Dated: ZO
James JvKutz, Esquire
Pa. Supreme Court I.D. No.
Michael W. Winfield, Esquir
Pa. Supreme Court I.D. No. 72680
POST & SCHELL, P.C.
17 North Second Street, 12th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101
JKutz@postschell.com
MWinfield@postschell.com
Telephone: (717) 731-1970
Facsimile: (717)731-1985
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this date caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing