CLIENT- MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

REPORT ON
SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FIVE (05) STORIED
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT C.S -3 , S.A- 5, R.S -85, KALIGONJ,
GAZIPUR.

JANUARY - 2019

COMPILED BY:

141/4 LAKE CIRCUS, KALABAGAN, DHAKA.

Mobile- 01711163872, 01711946905
 CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………..………………………………………………………..01

OBJECTIVE …………………………………………….…..…………………………………………...……………………01

CLIENT AND PROJECT…………………………………..………………………………………....……………………01

FIELD WORKS ………………..…………………………..……….………………………………………………….……01

LABORATORY WORKS………..………………………………….…………………………………………….……….02

ESTIMATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY…………..............................................................3-4

CORRECTION OF SPT VALUES ………………………………………………………………………..…………….05

BEARING CAPACITY FOR DEEP TYPE OF

FOUNDATION………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………..6-9

SOIL CONDITION & RECOMMENDATION….…………….……..………………………………...…………….10

Appendix
BORING LOCATION AND GRAPHS……………………………………………………………..…………………..A1

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS………………………………………………………………………….……………A2

 ABBREVIATION

USCS Unified Soil Classification System

SPT Standard Penetration Test

BH Bore Hole

WL Water Level

C Cohesion of soil

Cc Compression Index

Cv Coefficient of Consolidation

e Void Ratio

e0 in situ Void Ratio

EGL Existing Ground Level

NMC Natural Moisture Content

N SPT blow count

N' Corrected SPT for Overburden Pressure

qu Unconfined Compression Strength

SF Safety Factor

Sp.Gr. Specific Gravity

PI Plasticity index= wL-wP

Ø angle of internal friction

Ү unit weight
 -1-

1.0 Introduction
Sub-soil investigation is a predominant feature in designing foundation of important structure
in an intelligent, economic and satisfactory way. Both results of field and laboratory
investigations are essential to obtain necessary information in this regard. “PRIME SUB SOIL”
performed the sub-soil investigations at the proposed site for the “MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.”
The investigation comprises soil boring, field-testing, soil sampling, and laboratory testing.
The fieldwork was completed in January - 2019. This report contains relevant data, bore-logs,
drawing and graphs as well as soil stratification and very tentative recommendation about the
type of foundations.
2.0 Objective:
The purpose of soil exploration is to find out strength characteristics of the Sub-Soil over
which the Structure will have to be built. The soil exploration should provide the necessary
data to evaluate the following: -
-The safe Bearing Capacity of Soil.
-The location of Ground Water Table.
-The choice and Depth of Foundation.
- To determine the probable maximum & differential settlement
3.0 Client and project
KALIGONJ, GAZIPUR.

4.0 Field Works

The land is approximately plan each boring includes the following field works:
-Standard penetration test (SPT)
-Collection of disturbed samples
-Collection of undisturbed samples
-Field classification of soils
-Recording of ground water table (GWT)
-Sealing of undisturbed samples by tube
 -2-
4.1 Exploratory borings
Field works actually consists of three (03) numbers of Exploratory Bore Holes (location shown
in the enclosed layout plan) up to 21.30m depth below existing ground surface.

4.2 Collection of Disturbed soil Samples

The Standard Penetration Tests were performed at every 1.50m intervals up to the final depth
of all bore holes. 42 nos. of Disturbed Soil Samples were extracted at every Standard
Penetration Test point.

4.3 Collection of Undisturbed Soil Samples

Undisturbed soil samples were collected by means of thin walled sharp-ended 3 inch diameter
Shelby tubes from different bore holes. The depth corresponding to the undisturbed soil
samples are shown on the bore-logs. 0 nos. of Undisturbed Soil Samples were extracted at
Cohesive Zone from the four bore holes.
4.4 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
The test involved driving of split spoon sampler of 1.375 inches (35 mm) inner and 2 inches
(50 mm) outer diameter and 2 ft. long by a standard 140 1bs (63.6 Kg) hammer using 30
inches (762 mm) free fall. The number of blows necessary for the penetration of final 12 inch
of the split spoon sampler has been recorded as N count. The N-values are shown in the bore-
log with corresponding depths.
4.5 Ground Water Table (GWT)
The Ground Water Table at Bore Holes were measured after 24 hours from completion of
Boring Works. The Depth of Water have been found at Project Area were shown in different
bore logs.
5.0 Laboratory Works
In addition to visual examination in the field, important laboratory tests on collected soil
samples from different soil strata have been carried out in the laboratory to evaluate
important soil parameters.
Laboratory works consist of the following important tests:
-Natural Moisture Content (w) Test
-Liquid Limit (wL) and Plastic Limit (wp) Test
-Specific Gravity (Gs Test
-Grain Size Analysis
-Unconfined Compressive Strength (qu) Test
-Consolidation (Cc, e0) Test
 -3-

6.0 ESTIMATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY

6.1 Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundation

The N value gives useful information with regards to consistency of cohesive soil and relative
density of cohesion less soil. These relationships are given in the Tables 7.1.1 and
7.1.2(a),(b),(c) for cohesive and cohesion less soil, respectively.

Table 6.1.1 Relation of N-value with the Consistency and the Unconfined Compressive
Strength of Cohesive Soils (after Bowles 1997).

Unconfined
N-values Consistency Compression Strength (qu)

tsf KPa
0-2 Very soft 0 to 0.25 0 to 25
3-5 Soft 0.25 to 0.50 25 to 50
6-9 Medium 0.50 to 1 50 to 100
10-16 Stiff 1 to 2 100 to 200
17-30 Very stiff 2 To 4 200 to 400
>30 Hard >4 >400
Table 6.1.2 (a) N and ф Relation to Relative Density for Fine Sand (after Bowles 1997)

N values Compactness Relative Density, Dr % ф (degree) Unit Weight (pcf)

1-2 Very Loose 0-15 26-28 70-100

3-6 Loose 15-35 28-30 90-115
7-15 Medium 35-65 30-34 110-130
16-30 Dense 65-85 33-38 110-140
Very Dense >85 >50 130-150

Table 6.1.2 (b) N and ф Relation to Relative Density for Medium Sand (after Bowles 1997)

N values Compactness Relative Density, Dr % ф (degree) Unit Weight (pcf)

2-3 Very Loose 0-15 27-28 70-100

4-7 Loose 15-35 30-32 90-115

8-20 Medium 35-65 32-36 110-130

21-40 Dense 65-85 36-42 110-140

>40 Very Dense >85 >50 130-150

 -4-
Table 6.1.2 (c) N and ф Relation to Relative Density for Coarse Sand (after Bowles 1997)

N values Compactness Relative Density, Dr % ф (degree) Unit Weight (pcf)

3-6 Very Loose 0-15 28-30 70-100

5-9 Loose 15-35 30-34 90-115

10-25 Medium 35-65 33-40 110-130

26-45 Dense 65-85 30-50 110-140

>45 Very Dense >85 >50 130-150

6.2 BEARING CAPACITY FOR DEEP FOUNDATION

Foundations, preferably piles are considered to transmit heavy load from superstructure to
deep and hard strata. As the formation of soil strata consists of cohesive and non-cohesive
type, the evaluation criteria for the determination of skin friction and the end bearing
capacities of piles also vary. Details of the evaluation are provided in the following sub-
headings.
Cohesive soil :

For soil under cohesive group i. e., for clay and plastic silt, the skin friction and the end bearing
capacities of square or circular pile may be evaluated by the following general formulae.
fsu =α Cu (7.2.1)
qpu =N Cu (7.2.2)
Where, fsu= Ultimate skin friction.
α = Adhesion factor (can be obtained from the table given below).
Cu = Untrained Shear Strength.
qpu = Ultimate end bearing of pile.
Nc = Bearing capacity factor for deep foundation =9
Non-cohesive soil:

For non-cohesive soil of silt, fine to medium sand the skin friction and the end bearing
capacities of pile may be evaluated by the following formulae, suggested by Meyer of.

fsu = 4N/200 tsf (7.2.3)

qpu = 4N tsf (7.2.4)

Where, fsu = Skin friction

qpu = End bearing of pile
N = SPT value
 -5-

7.0 CORRECTION OF SPT VALUES:

In granular soils, the overburden pressure affects the penetration resistance. As the
confining pressure in cohesion less soils increases with depth, the penetration number for
soils at shallow depth is underestimated and that at greater depths is overestimated. When
the N value at a depth corresponding to an effective overburden pressure of 0.5 tsf is
considered to be standard, the N value is required to be corrected.( Ref Peck, Hanson &
Thornburn) For uniformity, the N-values obtained from the field tests under different
effective overburden pressures have been corrected to a standard effective overburden
pressure according to the following equations suggested by different authors.

Bazaraa (1967), and Peck and Bazaraa (1969):

4Nf
N′ = if Po < 71.8 KN/m2 (1.50 ksf)
1+c1 P0

4Nf
N′ = if Po > 71.8 KN/m2 (1.50 ksf)
3.25 + C2 Po

Where N′ = Corrected SPT values

Nf = SPT recorded in the field

Po = Effective overburden pressure

C1 = 0.04 for SI units; = 2.0 for Fps units

C2 = 0.01 for SI units; = 0.5 for Fps units.

Moreover, silty fine sands and fine sands below the water table develop pore pressure which is
not easily dissipated. The pore pressure affects the resistance of the soil and hence the
penetration number. Terzaghi and Peck (1967) recommended the following correction in the
case of silty-fine sand when the observed values of N′ exceeds 15.
N = 15 + 0.5 (N′ - 15)
Where, N = Final corrected SPT value.
 6
8.0 BEARING CAPACITY OF PROPOSED FOUNDATION
TABLE FOR SQUARE & STRIP (CONTINUOUS) FOOTING/RAFT FOUNDATION

Allowable bearing capacity in

TSF with F.S=3
Cohesion Qult=C Nc Sc + γ Df Nq+ 0.5 γ B
Bore Depth in Field SPT Corrected in Nγ Sγ Let width of RAFT
holes no Meter values SPT TSF footing=(1.5m to 2.0m) (TSF)
Strip
Square or
(continuous)
Circular footing
footing
1.5 13 13 0.81 2.04 1.58 1.81
1 3 23 19 1.19 3.01 2.33 2.67
4.5 20 18 1.09 2.81 2.19 2.50

1.5 12 12 0.75 1.89 1.46 1.68

2 3 21 18 1.13 2.85 2.21 2.53
4.5 17 16 1.00 2.58 2.01 2.30

1.5 18 17 1.03 2.58 2.00 2.29

3 3 26 21 1.28 3.24 2.51 2.87
4.5 22 19 1.16 2.97 2.31 2.64

According to Tarzaghi Bearing capacities Theory for shallow foundation, The Bearing Capacity Factors have been taken
from Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Factor Table
 7
Bearing capacities of piles from the SPT and soil Parameters
Q=πD* L* fs+ π/4* D^2* fb
Q=Pile capacity
fs= value of the skin friction B.H NO. = 1.0
fb=value of pile end bearing capacity
D=diameter of pile F.S = 3.00
L=length of pile
α=adhesion factor
Cu=shearing strength
N=standard penetration number
Depth SPT C. SPT Soil α Cu fs fb Qa (ton)
m No's No's c tsf tsf tsf 18 inch 20 inch 24 inch 26 inch

s 0.450 m 0.500 m 0.600 m 0.650 m

1.5 13 13 c 0.538 1.625 0.87 21.1 19 22 30 35
3.0 23 19 c 0.378 2.375 0.90 45.1 39 47 64 73
4.5 20 18 c 0.397 2.250 0.89 40.5 43 51 68 78
6.0 8 8 c 0.845 1.000 0.85 8 30 34 42 47
7.5 10 10 c 0.687 1.250 0.86 12.5 40 45 56 62
9.0 11 11 c 0.628 1.375 0.86 15.1 48 54 68 75
10.5 18 17 c 0.419 2.125 0.89 36.1 68 78 100 112
12.0 8 8 c 0.845 1.000 0.85 8 56 63 77 84
13.5 12 12 c 0.58 1.500 0.87 18 70 79 98 107
15.0 16 16 c 0.444 2.000 0.89 32 86 97 122 136
16.5 37 26 s 0.282 3.250 0.52 104 103 122 163 187
18.0 46 31 s 0.24 3.875 0.62 124 127 150 201 229
19.5 56 36 s 0.209 4.500 0.72 144 153 180 241 274
21.0 65 40 s 0.189 5.000 0.80 160 176 207 276 314
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0

N.B.: According to Meyerhof Bearing capacities Theory Based on Standard Penetration Test Values with soil parameters
for deep foundation.
 8
Bearing capacities of piles from the SPT and soil Parameters
Q=πD* L* fs+ π/4* D^2* fb
Q=Pile capacity
fs= value of the skin friction B.H NO. = 2.0
fb=value of pile end bearing capacity
D=diameter of pile F.S = 3.00
L=length of pile
α=adhesion factor
Cu=shearing strength
N=standard penetration number
Depth SPT C. SPT Soil α Cu fs fb Qa (ton)
m No's No's c tsf tsf tsf 18 inch 20 inch 24 inch 26 inch

s 0.450 m 0.500 m 0.600 m 0.650 m

1.5 12 12 c 0.58 1.500 0.87 18 17 20 27 31
3.0 21 18 c 0.397 2.250 0.89 40.5 37 44 59 68
4.5 17 16 c 0.444 2.000 0.89 32 38 45 59 67
6.0 7 7 c 0.957 0.875 0.84 6.13 29 33 40 44
7.5 8 8 c 0.845 1.000 0.85 8 37 41 51 56
9.0 9 9 c 0.757 1.125 0.85 10.1 45 50 62 68
10.5 8 8 c 0.845 1.000 0.85 8 50 56 68 75
12.0 7 7 c 0.957 0.875 0.84 6.13 54 61 74 81
13.5 7 7 c 0.957 0.875 0.84 6.13 61 68 83 90
15.0 20 18 c 0.397 2.250 0.89 40.5 91 104 132 146
16.5 31 23 s 0.316 2.875 0.46 92 91 108 145 165
18.0 43 29 s 0.255 3.625 0.58 116 119 140 188 215
19.5 56 36 s 0.209 4.500 0.72 144 153 180 241 274
21.0 66 41 s 0.185 5.125 0.82 164 181 212 283 321
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0

N.B.: According to Meyerhof Bearing capacities Theory Based on Standard Penetration Test Values with soil parameters
for deep foundation.
 9
Bearing capacities of piles from the SPT and soil Parameters
Q=πD* L* fs+ π/4* D^2* fb
Q=Pile capacity
fs= value of the skin friction B.H NO. = 3.0
fb=value of pile end bearing capacity
D=diameter of pile F.S = 3.00
L=length of pile
α=adhesion factor
Cu=shearing strength
N=standard penetration number
Depth SPT C. SPT Soil α Cu fs fb Qa (ton)
m No's No's c tsf tsf tsf 18 inch 20 inch 24 inch 26 inch

s 0.450 m 0.500 m 0.600 m 0.650 m

1.5 18 17 c 0.419 2.125 0.89 36.1 27 33 46 53
3.0 26 21 c 0.344 2.625 0.90 55.1 45 54 74 85
4.5 22 19 c 0.378 2.375 0.90 45.1 46 55 73 83
6.0 7 7 c 0.957 0.875 0.84 6.13 29 33 40 44
7.5 8 8 c 0.845 1.000 0.85 8 37 41 51 56
9.0 10 10 c 0.687 1.250 0.86 12.5 46 52 65 71
10.5 17 16 c 0.444 2.000 0.89 32 65 75 95 106
12.0 23 19 c 0.378 2.375 0.90 45.1 80 92 119 133
13.5 9 9 c 0.757 1.125 0.85 10.1 64 72 88 96
15.0 14 14 c 0.502 1.750 0.88 24.5 81 92 114 126
16.5 34 25 s 0.293 3.125 0.50 100 99 117 157 179
18.0 47 31 s 0.24 3.875 0.62 124 127 150 201 229
19.5 56 36 s 0.209 4.500 0.72 144 153 180 241 274
21.0 60 38 s 0.198 4.750 0.76 152 168 197 262 298
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0

N.B.: According to Meyerhof Bearing capacities Theory Based on Standard Penetration Test Values with soil parameters
for deep foundation.
 -10-
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION:

Experienced structural engineer and geo-technical engineer are required to work side by side
to select the appropriate foundation type needed for the site of MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

Recommendation for a foundation type does not depend only on soil parameters rather some
other factors like architectural layout, loading condition, importance factor, financial
constraints, availability of building materials in particular region and construction technique
etc. also play important role. Since it is beyond the scope of our assigned job, we refrain from
recommending specific foundation type but can only provide our impression.

Our findings on the basis of field boring exploration & laboratory investigation are recorded as
below:

The top soil layer consists of Reddish stiff to very stiff silty CLAY maximum depth of 4.50m
from EGL, followed by Brownish stiff clayey SILT in nature.

The soil compactness of each respective layer is more or less regular.

The sub soil formation is almost homogeneous.

Under the prevailing sub-soil condition as evident from above analysis we may recommend
following type of foundation.

R.C.C Individual column footing

To be considered 2.17tsf (F.S=3.00) at a depth of 5ft 0inch measured from EGL
particularly at and around boring arena.

Deep Foundation:

a. Alternatively, the Deep foundations, preferably of the piles may also be considered. The
required values of the skin friction as well as the end bearing capacities of the pile
(Driven type) are provided in the page no 7-9

b. The Carrying capacities of the pile to be calculated from the table values (Ref page no 7-
9 ) Must be confirmed from carrying out the Load test (Bored R.C.C pile) or from the
field driven records (Driven pile) covering the entire building area.

However, the choice of foundation type depends upon the designer who may select any type of
foundation at any depth of considering framing pattern of structure, overall economy and site
condition, he can also calculate bearing capacity considering the theory suitable to him and
also on his engineering judgment.
 PRIME SUB SOIL
CLIENT MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

LOCATION KALIGONJ, GAZIPUR.

Date of Boring 17/1/19
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
BH-1 Ground Level (+) 0.3m from top of road
ASTM D- 2487 & D-2488
Ground water Level (-) 3.0m from EGL
Thickness(m)
Sample type

Depth (m)
Sample ID

Symbols

15 cm
15 cm
15 cm
30 cm
Description of Materials Graphical Representation of
SPT N- Value
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

.
D-1 1.5 13 1.5 13
0.0-4.50

Reddish stiff to very stiff 3.0

D-2 3.0 23 23
silty CLAY
D-3 4.5 20 4.5 20

10.16cm DIA WASH BORING METHOD

D-4 6.0 8 6.0 8
6.00-9.00

Brownish stiff clayey 7.5

D-5 7.5 10 10
SILT
D-6 9.0 11 9.0 11

D-7 10.5 18 10.5 18

10.50-15.00

D-8 12.0 8 12.0 8

Whitish stiff to very stiff
CLAY, trace fine sand. 13.5 12
D-9 13.5 12

D-10 15.0 16 15.0 16

D-11 16.5 37 16.5 37

16.50-21.00

D-12 18.0 46 18.0 46

Brownish dense to very
dense silty FINE SAND 19.5 56
D-13 19.5 56

D-14 21.0 65 21.0 65

D-15 22.5

D-16 24.0

D-17 25.5

D-18 27.0

D-19 28.5

D-20 30.0

CLAY SAND SILT SPLIT SPOON SHELBY TUBE

 PRIME SUB SOIL
CLIENT MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

LOCATION KALIGONJ, GAZIPUR.

Date of Boring 17/1/19
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
BH-2 Ground Level (-) 0.3m from top of road
ASTM D- 2487 & D-2488
Ground water Level (-) 3.0m from EGL
Thickness(m)
Sample type

Depth (m)
Sample ID

Symbols

15 cm
15 cm
15 cm
30 cm
Description of Materials Graphical Representation of
SPT N- Value
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

.
D-1 1.5 12 1.5 12
0.0-4.50

Reddish stiff to very stiff 3.0

D-2 3.0 21 21
silty CLAY
D-3 4.5 17 4.5 17

10.16cm DIA WASH BORING METHOD

D-4 6.0 7 6.0 7
6.00-9.00

Brownish stiff clayey 7.5

D-5 7.5 8 8
SILT
D-6 9.0 9 9.0 9

D-7 10.5 8 10.5 8

10.50-15.00

D-8 12.0 7 12.0 7

Whitish stiff to very stiff
CLAY, trace fine sand. 13.5 7
D-9 13.5 7

D-10 15.0 20 15.0 20

D-11 16.5 31 16.5 31

16.50-21.00

D-12 18.0 43 18.0 43

Brownish dense to very
dense silty FINE SAND 19.5 56
D-13 19.5 56

D-14 21.0 66 21.0 66

D-15 22.5

D-16 24.0

D-17 25.5

D-18 27.0

D-19 28.5

D-20 30.0

CLAY SAND SILT SPLIT SPOON SHELBY TUBE

 PRIME SUB SOIL
CLIENT MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

LOCATION KALIGONJ, GAZIPUR.

Date of Boring 17/1/19
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
BH-3 Ground Level (-) 0.6m from top of road
ASTM D- 2487 & D-2488
Ground water Level (-) 2.7m from EGL
Thickness(m)
Sample type

Depth (m)
Sample ID

Symbols

15 cm
15 cm
15 cm
30 cm
Description of Materials Graphical Representation of
SPT N- Value
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

.
D-1 1.5 18 1.5 18
0.0-4.50

Reddish stiff to very stiff 3.0

D-2 3.0 26 26
silty CLAY
D-3 4.5 22 4.5 22

10.16cm DIA WASH BORING METHOD

D-4 6.0 7 6.0 7
6.00-9.00

Brownish stiff clayey 7.5

D-5 7.5 8 8
SILT
D-6 9.0 10 9.0 10

D-7 10.5 17 10.5 17

10.50-15.00

D-8 12.0 23 12.0 23

Whitish stiff to very stiff
CLAY, trace fine sand. 13.5 9
D-9 13.5 9

D-10 15.0 14 15.0 14

D-11 16.5 34 16.5 34

16.50-21.00

D-12 18.0 47 18.0 47

Brownish dense to very
dense silty FINE SAND 19.5 56
D-13 19.5 56

D-14 21.0 60 21.0 60

D-15 22.5

D-16 24.0

D-17 25.5

D-18 27.0

D-19 28.5

D-20 30.0

CLAY SAND SILT SPLIT SPOON SHELBY TUBE

 100

90

80
Percentage passing
70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle size (mm)

BH NO. Sample No. Depth (m) Legend USCS Sand Silt Clay

1 D-3 4.50 7 52 41

1 D-9 13.50 8 70 22

2 D-4 6.00 5 66 29

100
90
80
Percentage passing

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Particle size (mm)

BH NO. Sample No. Depth (m) Legend USCS Sand Silt Clay

1 D-11 16.5 80 20 0

1 D-13 19.5 94 6 0

2 D-12 18.0 86 14 0

Particle Size Distribution

 100

90

80
Percentage passing
70
60

50
40

30

20

10
0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle size (mm)

BH NO. Sample No. Depth (m) Legend USCS Sand Silt Clay

2 D-9 13.50 3 80 17

3 D-2 3.00 2 55 43

3 D-6 9.00 8 71 21

100
90
80
Percentage passing

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Particle size (mm)

BH NO. Sample No. Depth (m) Legend USCS Sand Silt Clay

2 D-14 21.0 89 11 0

3 D-13 19.5 96 4 0

3 D-14 21.0 79 21 0

Particle Size Distribution

 2 2

1.5 1.5
SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²) NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²)

BH NO. Sample Depth (m) Legend φο c

1 D-11 16.5 31 0.0

1 D-13 19.5 36 0.0

2 2

1.5 1.5
SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²) NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²)

BH NO. Sample Depth (m) Legend φ

ο
c
2 D-12 18 36 0.0

2 D-14 21.0 36 0.0

Direct Shear Test

 2 2

1.5 1.5
SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²) NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²)

BH NO. Sample Depth (m) Legend φο c

3 D-13 19.5 36 0.0

3 D-14 21.0 36 0.0

2 2

1.5 1.5
SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

SHEAR STRESS , (kg/cm²)

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²) NORMAL STRESS (kg/cm²)

BH NO. Sample Depth (m) Legend φ

ο
c
4 0.0

4 0.0

Direct Shear Test

A2 SUMMARY SHEET MD. TOFAZZAL HOSEN.

LL= Liquid limit γWT= Wet (gm/cc) cu= Undrained shear strength (kg/scm) e0= Void ratio
PI = Plasticity index γd= Dry (gm/cc) C= Cohesion (kg/scm) Cc= Compression index
Gs= Specific gravity φο= Angle of internal friction (deg)
NATURAL SPECIFIC UNCONFINED CONSOLIDATIO DIRECT SHEAR
BORE HOLE

ATTERBERG UNIT WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE

DEPTH MOISTURE GRAVITY COMPRESSIVE N TEST TEST
LIMIT (gm/cc) (%)
NO

SAMPLE CONTENT STRENGTH

LL PI γ γδ SAND SILT CLAY % (wt) Gs cu % Strain e0 Cc C φο

D-3 4.5m 40 26 - - 7 52 41 27.14 2.640 - - - -
D-9 13.5m 47 32 - - 8 70 22 27.50 2.650 - -
1
D-11 16.5m NP NP - - 80 20 - - - - - - - 31
D-13 19.5m NP NP - - 94 6 - - - - - - - 36

D-4 6.0m 48 34 - - 5 66 29 30.97 2.680 - - - -

D-9 13.5m 45 30 - - 3 80 17 28.09 2.680 - -
2
D-12 18.0m NP NP - - 86 14 - - - - - - - 36
D-14 21.0m NP NP - - 89 11 - - - - - - - 36

D-2 3.0m 38 24 - - 2 55 43 25.51 2.630 - - - -

D-6 9.0m 48 33 - - 8 71 21 28.94 2.670 - -
3
D-13 19.5m NP NP - - 96 4 - - - - - - - 36
D-14 21.0m NP NP - - 79 21 - - - - - - - 36