Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GA Chair Report
GA Chair Report
General Assembly
CHAIR REPORT
CHAIRS
Head Chair: Harsha Madhu
Deputy Chair: Dhruv Leekha
Introduction
First seen in 1948, the UN peacekeeping forces have been conducted 72 missions
throughout history, and have undoubtedly made significant and notable contributions. The UN
peacekeeping forces consist of over 78,000 soldiers and 25,000 civilians, amassed from 14
countries overall — second only to the US in military force. As a result, all these efforts have
served to be an icon of belief to the general public. Despite this, due to its continued lack of
transparency, corruption in conduct and structure, and handicaps in technology advancements,
the United Nations peacekeeping forces have also succumbed to allow an opening for criminal
acts. As sustaining international peace is at the crux of the vision of the United Nations, it is
essential that this issue is resolved immediately.
Criminal Liability
Peacekeeping Forces
Background Information
UN peacekeeping was first established in 1948, during which time concerns regarding the
Cold War frequently plagued the Security Council. Therefore, peacekeeping was a solution, as
the name states, to stabilise and maintain peace, and provide support in areas of conflict.
Key Issues
Nations are often unwilling to offer their own troops towards UN Peacekeeping, seeing as
there is no incentive for nations to donate troops towards conflicts in which they have no
involvement in. Due to this, UN Peacekeeping simply does not have the numbers that one would
expect from such a large organisation, leading to there being one Peacekeeper per 400 square
miles in Western Sahara, for example. Moreover, due to the UN’s tight budget for peacekeeping,
most Peacekeepers are poorly trained and poorly equipped; something that can lead to several
issues since Peacekeepers operate in some of the most volatile regions on Earth. Additionally,
the troop leaders or ‘commandos’ (as they are informally known) report to both the UN and their
own nation’s military chain of command, thus causing conflicts of interest in decision making.
This is the most macro scale issue regarding UN Peacekeeping, and most likely will be the most
difficult to solve. Peacekeeping has largely focused on, obviously, maintaining the peace in
countries. However, this is in itself a short-term fix, as they are not addressing the root causes of
conflicts in these regions. Due to this, once the Peacekeeping mission terminates, the conflicts in
many of these regions remain. Even in supposed Peacekeeping success stories such as in Cyprus,
the issues that are the root case remain, thus Cyprus still remains divided and disputed between
Turkey and Greece.
India
India is one of the largest personnel contributors to the UN, and has had their soldiers
suffer the most casualties in missions. Many speculate that this is for India to validate their
efforts to gain a permanent seat in the UNSC, nevertheless, Indian forces and commandos have
always been an integral part of UN Peacekeeping. India’s primary issue with current
Peacekeeping efforts is that India is contributing far too many forces of their own, that too, for
conflicts which they don’t even have a voice in deciding. Even as India is currently starved for
troops back home, they have triple the number of officers abroad than in similar domestic units,
showing how large India’s commitment is to Peacekeeping. India’s desire for a permanent seat
on the UNSC relates to Peacekeeping since they could have a substantive role in deciding the
mandate of peacekeeping operations. Moreover, India and other nations are still not being paid
by the UN for their contributions.
America is the largest financial contributor to the UN. Despite this, the Trump
administration has moved to decrease the peacekeeping budget, successfully lowering the budget
by half a billion dollars last year. Moreover, despite only supplying 35 uniformed personnel to
UNPKO, they are still trying to altogether involvement in African missions, with former
National Security Advisor John Bolton publicly announcing his frustrations that despite these
missions being incredibly ineffective, the countries that send troops are still being paid (on
America’s dime). However, America is still not paying its UN decided “fair share” to
Peacekeeping missions. Congress refuses to approve the full financing that America is obligated
to pay, and there are further problems as well. America’s goal will most likely be to reform
Peacekeeping operations on a very macro level, to make them more effective, and possibly
harder to approve.
China
China is currently trying to fill the space that the US is vacating in UNPKO. China is
pushing hard to supply permanent troops to Peacekeeping operations, financing large portions of
missions, and playing up their involvement in international peacemaking efforts. This ties into
China’s efforts to become the global hegemon of the 21st century. Besides this, China actually
has expressed little to no issues with the current ways in which UNPKO. More than this, China,
in committee, may be looking to minimise the amount of power states that contribute troops get
in deciding the mandates of missions, seeing as they want to ensure that they are able to
maximise their power in UN Peacekeeping, by preventing non-UNSC states from having a say.
Russia
Russia is very satisfied with the current status-quo of UN Peacekeeping. As they have the
power to veto any mission, and since the Uniting For Peace Resolution is not often used, the
threat of their veto have ended the idea of several peacekeeping missions such as one to Ukraine,
further intervention in Kosovo, or even in the Sinai Peninsula. The current system is very
favourable to Russia, therefore it is likely that during committee they will be vehement advocates
of at least maintaining the veto system for UNPKO missions, and most likely would not want to
expand on the Uniting For Peace Resolution.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia does not supply any personnel whatsoever to UN Peacekeeping. However, they
still owe nearly 200 thousand USD to the UN from past debts and the current budget. Moreover,
seeing as Saudi Arabia is unwilling to supply any troops as of now, it is likely that in committee
they would be in opposition to efforts that may force countries to supply personnel or penalise
them for not doing so. However, at the same time, it is possible that they will favour allowing
more power for the General Assembly to form the mandate of peacekeeping missions, so that
perhaps Saudi Arabia could manipulate these missions to adapt to their stances on key Middle
Eastern conflicts, such as missions in Yemen.
UNTSO Established
May 1948 First form of UN peacekeeping sent to Israel/Palestine, this was a strictly
observational mission.
Up until this point, Peacekeeping operations were being run under the
Feb. 1992
Department of Special Political Affairs. This department being established
demonstrates the newfound significance of UN Peacekeeping.
UNPROFOR Established
UNOSOM I Established
April 1992 The first Somalian UN Peacekeeping mission was established. Many consider
the Somalian mission, alongside its successor UNOSOM II, to be significant
UNMIH Established
UNAMIR Established
UNMIK Established
Possible Solutions
While the current UN peacekeeping systems may be considered flawed, this does not
necessarily mean that it is unable to be corrected. Delegates should collaborate and negotiate to
create ways in which to resolve the complications, as there is an urgent need to reconstruct the
structure of the current peacekeeping systems. Delegates could potentially look at current donors
of peacekeeping troops, and restrict those with a significant criminal history from contributing to
the UN peacekeeping forces. By doing this, the UN peacekeeping forces will be able to uphold
their legitimacy. Furthermore, transparency should also be maintained, possibly through
inspections and reports becoming available to a broader audience.
● https://www.stimson.org/content/reducing-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-un-peacekeepin
g
● https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/action-for-peacekeeping-a4p
● https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-12-11/crisis-peacekeeping
● https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/what-we-do
● https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/17/un-united-nations-peacekeepers-rwanda
-bosnia
● https://theglobalobservatory.org/2018/10/in-us-failure-pay-peacekeeping-bills-larger-fina
ncing-questions-raised/
Bibliography
● Séverine Autesserre (29 Jan. 2019.). The Crisis of Peacekeeping. Foreign Affairs.
Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-12-11/crisis-peacekeeping
● Wikipedia Contributors (26 Sept. 2019.). History of United Nations peacekeeping.
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_Nations_peacekeeping
● thestar.com (12 Apr. 2017.). More than 100 UN peacekeepers ran a child sex ring in
Haiti. None were ever jailed | The Star. thestar.com. Retrieved from
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/04/12/un-peacekeepers-child-sex-ring-left-vict
ims-but-no-arrests.html
● Freedman, Rosa (9 Nov. 2018.). UNaccountable: A New Approach to Peacekeepers and
Sexual Abuse. OUP Academic. Retrieved from
https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/29/3/961/5165638
● Troop And Police Contributors (n.d.). Historical Timeline of UN Peacekeeping. United
Nations Peacekeeping. Retrieved from
https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/historical-timeline-of-un-peacekeeping
● https://www.apnews.com/96f9ff66b7b34d9f971edf0e92e2082c
● https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/action-for-peacekeeping-a4p
● https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/17/un-united-nations-peacekeepers-rwanda
-bosnia
● https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/india-contribution-to-un-peacekeeping/arti
cle25968721.ece
● https://www.pminewyork.gov.in/pdf/menu/submenu__1179138981.pdf
● https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/india-and-un-peacekeeping-declining-interest-with-
grave-implications
● http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/bring-the-troops-back/333594/
● https://www.voanews.com/usa/us-rethinking-peacekeeping-role-africa
● https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/data-troop-and-police-contributions
● https://thewire.in/diplomacy/pay-the-countries-sending-peacekeepers-india-tells-un
● https://theglobalobservatory.org/2018/10/in-us-failure-pay-peacekeeping-bills-larger-fina
ncing-questions-raised/
● https://thediplomat.com/2018/04/china-takes-the-lead-in-un-peacekeeping/
● https://www.passblue.com/2019/07/16/the-future-of-un-peacekeeping-will-resemble-wha
t-it-is-now/
● Regeringskansliet (29 Apr. 2016.). How UN peacekeeping operations can become more
effective. Regeringskansliet. Retrieved from
https://www.government.se/opinion-pieces/2015/01/how-un-peacekeeping-operations-ca
n-become-more-effective/